Pryor School District No. 2 & 3

EIN: 816000030

UEI: FK8YSKZUJT85

Data as of August 23, 2026

Pryor School District No. 2 & 310 audit years15 findings11 repeat
10
Audit Years
15
Total Findings
11
Repeat Findings

FY 2023-06-30

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on April 23, 2024. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by October 23, 2024 (669 days ago).

What is a management decision? →
2023-003
Other
REPEAT

The School District did not complete and submit their audit to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse by the due date of March 31, 2024. Questioned Costs: None. Criteria: 2 CFR §200.512 of the Uniform Guidance requires an entity expending more than $750,000 of federal funds within the calendar year to submit a data collection form and reporting package by a due date that is the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditor’s report(s) or nine months after the end of the audit period. Cause: During FY 2020-21, 2021-22, and 2022-23 the School District employed multiple Business Managers. This affected providing documentation in a timely manner. Effect: Late filing of the data collection form results in noncompliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance which could lead to sanctions by funding agencies. Recommendation: We recommend the School District become familiar with reporting requirements for each award and implement procedures to begin audit preparation work earlier in the fiscal year to ensure reports are filed within the nine-month reporting deadline set forth by Uniform Guidance. Views of Responsible Officials: Please refer to the Corrective Action Plan for management’s views and planned corrective action.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding 2023-003 – Reporting - Compliance (Repeat Finding: 2022-008, 2021-006) Significant Deficiency Condition: The School District did not complete and submit their audit to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse by the due date of March 31, 2024. Questioned Costs: None. Criteria: 2 CFR §200.512 of the Uniform Guidance requires an entity expending more than $750,000 of federal funds within the calendar year to submit a data collection form and reporting package by a due date that is the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditor’s report(s) or nine months after the end of the audit period. Cause: During FY 2020-21, 2021-22, and 2022-23 the School District employed multiple Business Managers. This affected providing documentation in a timely manner. Effect: Late filing of the data collection form results in noncompliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance which could lead to sanctions by funding agencies. Recommendation: We recommend the School District become familiar with reporting requirements for each award and implement procedures to begin audit preparation work earlier in the fiscal year to ensure reports are filed within the nine-month reporting deadline set forth by Uniform Guidance. Views of Responsible Officials: Please refer to the Corrective Action Plan for management’s views and planned corrective action.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding 2023-003 - Reporting w Compliance (Repeat Finding: 2022-008, 2021-006) Significant Deficiency Condition: The School District did not complete and submit their audit to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse by the due date of March 31, 2024, Questioned Costs: None. Criteria: 2 CFR §200.512 of the Uniform Guidance requires an entity expending more than $750,000 of federal funds within the calendar year to submit a data collection form and reporting package by a due date that is the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditor's report(s) or nine months after the end of the audit period. Cause: During FY 2020-21, 2021-22, and 2022-23 the School District employed multiple Business Managers. This affected providing documentation In a timely manner. Effect: Late filing of the data _collection forn1 results in noncompliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance which could lead to sanctions by funding agencies. Recommendation: We recommend the School District become familiar with reporting requirements for each award and Implement procedures to begin audit preparation work earlier in the fiscal year to ensure reports are filed within the nine-month reporting deadline set faith by Uniform Guidance, Views of Responsible Officials: The Superintendent and the Business manager concur with this finding. We are unable to find an auditor in the state of Montana and will continue to work with the current audit company to ensure that the audit is completed in a timely manner and by the deadlines required by the state.

Prior Finding References

2022-008

About Other →

FY 2022-06-30

FAC accepted this audit on November 15, 2023 — management decision was due May 15, 2024.

2022-006
Cost Allowability
MATERIAL WEAKNESSREPEAT

During our testing of internal controls over nonpayroll disbursements we reviewed 10 transactions, noting there was no supporting documentation for 2 transactions. No additional documentation was present to show that approval was obtained through other means, such as by email, verbally or follow-up signature approval from the program director. The sampling was not a statistically valid sample. Questioned Costs: None. Criteria: Internal controls should be in place that provide reasonable assurance that all financial transactions are reviewed and approved before payments are made and reports generated. No one individual should handle a transaction from its inception to its completion. Cause: Inattention to the procedures already in place to ensure that all transactions are properly authorized by appropriate personnel signing approvals before payment is issued may have led to this finding. Effect: Inadequate internal controls over disbursements could adversely affect the School District’s ability to detect misstatements in amounts that would be material in relation to the financial statements in a timely period by employees in the normal course of performing their assigned functions. Recommendation: We recommend that the School District strengthen its internal control policies and procedures over expenditures and employees indicate their review and approval for all transactions to ensure they are properly authorized.Views of Responsible Officials: Please refer to the Corrective Action Plan for management’s views and planned corrective action.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding 2022-006 – Internal Control Over Disbursements for Allowable Costs/Activities (Repeat Finding: 2021-007, 2020-007) Material Weakness AL Number: 84.425 Education Stabilization Fund Condition: During our testing of internal controls over nonpayroll disbursements we reviewed 10 transactions, noting there was no supporting documentation for 2 transactions. No additional documentation was present to show that approval was obtained through other means, such as by email, verbally or follow-up signature approval from the program director. The sampling was not a statistically valid sample. Questioned Costs: None. Criteria: Internal controls should be in place that provide reasonable assurance that all financial transactions are reviewed and approved before payments are made and reports generated. No one individual should handle a transaction from its inception to its completion. Cause: Inattention to the procedures already in place to ensure that all transactions are properly authorized by appropriate personnel signing approvals before payment is issued may have led to this finding. Effect: Inadequate internal controls over disbursements could adversely affect the School District’s ability to detect misstatements in amounts that would be material in relation to the financial statements in a timely period by employees in the normal course of performing their assigned functions. Recommendation: We recommend that the School District strengthen its internal control policies and procedures over expenditures and employees indicate their review and approval for all transactions to ensure they are properly authorized.Views of Responsible Officials: Please refer to the Corrective Action Plan for management’s views and planned corrective action.

Corrective Action Plan

The Board Chairmen concurs with the finding, a new business manager was put in place August 2022, and is familiar with filing and organizing documents. REQs have been put into place for all purchases.

Prior Finding References

2021-007

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →
2022-007
Cost Allowability
MATERIAL WEAKNESSREPEAT

During our testing of internal controls over credit card expenditures we reviewed 27 transactions, noting there was no supporting documentation for 8 transactions. No additional documentation was present to show that approval was obtained through other means, such as by email, verbally or follow-up signature approval from the program director. The sampling was not a statistically valid sample. Questioned Costs: None. Criteria: Internal controls should be in place that provide reasonable assurance that all credit card transactions are reviewed and approved before payments are made and reports generated. Credit card usage should be limited to authorized staff for authorized purposes. No one individual should handle a transaction from its inception to its completion. Cause: Inattention to the procedures already in place to ensure that all transactions are properly authorized by appropriate personnel signing approvals before payment is issued may have led to this finding. Effect: Inadequate internal controls over credit card usage could adversely affect the School District’s ability to detect misstatements in amounts that would be material in relation to the financial statements in a timely period by employees in the normal course of performing their assigned functions. Recommendation: We recommend that the School District strengthens internal control policies and procedures over credit card usage and employees indicate their review and approval for all transactions to ensure they are properly authorized. Views of Responsible Officials: Please refer to the Corrective Action Plan for management’s views and planned corrective action.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding 2022-007 – Internal Control Over Credit Card Expenditures for Allowable Costs/Activities (Repeat Finding: 2021-008, 2020-008) Material Weakness AL Number: 84.041 Impact Aid Condition: During our testing of internal controls over credit card expenditures we reviewed 27 transactions, noting there was no supporting documentation for 8 transactions. No additional documentation was present to show that approval was obtained through other means, such as by email, verbally or follow-up signature approval from the program director. The sampling was not a statistically valid sample. Questioned Costs: None. Criteria: Internal controls should be in place that provide reasonable assurance that all credit card transactions are reviewed and approved before payments are made and reports generated. Credit card usage should be limited to authorized staff for authorized purposes. No one individual should handle a transaction from its inception to its completion. Cause: Inattention to the procedures already in place to ensure that all transactions are properly authorized by appropriate personnel signing approvals before payment is issued may have led to this finding. Effect: Inadequate internal controls over credit card usage could adversely affect the School District’s ability to detect misstatements in amounts that would be material in relation to the financial statements in a timely period by employees in the normal course of performing their assigned functions. Recommendation: We recommend that the School District strengthens internal control policies and procedures over credit card usage and employees indicate their review and approval for all transactions to ensure they are properly authorized. Views of Responsible Officials: Please refer to the Corrective Action Plan for management’s views and planned corrective action.

Corrective Action Plan

The Board Chairmen concurs with the finding and the Board has made changes during fiscal year 2021-22 and more specifically as of July 1, 2022 to address this on-going finding. The Board hired a new Business Manager that is well versed on records retention and record management. During the audit period accounts payable invoices and claims processing was reviewed by the District's Financial Consultant however the previous Business Manager did not file records in a proper manner for audit purposes. In addition claim forms with approval lines are now in place in teh absence of requisitions and purchase orders.

Prior Finding References

2021-008

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →
2022-008
Reporting

The School District did not complete and submit their audit to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse by the due date of March 31, 2023. Questioned Costs: None. Criteria: 2 CFR §200.512 of the Uniform Guidance requires an entity expending more than $750,000 of federal funds within the calendar year to submit a data collection form and reporting package by a due date that is the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditor’s report(s) or nine months after the end of the audit period. Cause: During FY 2020-21 and 2021-22 the School District employed multiple Business Managers. This affected providing documentation in a timely manner. Effect: Late filing of the data collection form results in noncompliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance which could lead to sanctions by funding agencies. Recommendation: We recommend the School District become familiar with reporting requirements for each award and implement procedures to begin audit preparation work earlier in the fiscal year to ensure reports are filed within the nine-month reporting deadline set forth by Uniform Guidance. Views of Responsible Officials: Please refer to the Corrective Action Plan for management’s views and planned corrective action.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding 2022-008 – Reporting (Compliance; Internal Control Over Compliance) Significant Deficiency AL Number: 84.041 Impact Aid AL Number: 84.425 Education Stabilization Fund Condition: The School District did not complete and submit their audit to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse by the due date of March 31, 2023. Questioned Costs: None. Criteria: 2 CFR §200.512 of the Uniform Guidance requires an entity expending more than $750,000 of federal funds within the calendar year to submit a data collection form and reporting package by a due date that is the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditor’s report(s) or nine months after the end of the audit period. Cause: During FY 2020-21 and 2021-22 the School District employed multiple Business Managers. This affected providing documentation in a timely manner. Effect: Late filing of the data collection form results in noncompliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance which could lead to sanctions by funding agencies. Recommendation: We recommend the School District become familiar with reporting requirements for each award and implement procedures to begin audit preparation work earlier in the fiscal year to ensure reports are filed within the nine-month reporting deadline set forth by Uniform Guidance. Views of Responsible Officials: Please refer to the Corrective Action Plan for management’s views and planned corrective action.

Corrective Action Plan

The Board Chairman concurs with the findings. The School District was dealing with a shortage of auditors in Montana and the audit started late. Documentation issue was due to the key employee turnover prior to August 2022.

About Reporting →

FY 2021-06-30

FAC accepted this audit on November 7, 2022 — management decision was due May 7, 2023.

2021-007
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability
MATERIAL WEAKNESSREPEAT

Purchase Requisitions are not being properly filled and/or approved by the Superintended for each expenditure. In addition, proper documentation is not being retained regarding expenditure transactions. Context: We noted the following deficiencies with major program expenditures: a) Purchase Requisitions should be used to request approval for expenditures and signed by the Superintendent. Out of the forty-two Major Program Expenditure Samples tested, five were missing the requisition form or the superintendent's signature approving the requisition totaling $1,987. It was determined the items were allowable under the grant. b) Invoices were unable to be provided to support the transaction for one of the fortytwo transactions selected for testing totaling $3,600. It was determined the items were allowable under the grant. We tested a sample of forty-two transactions totaling $19,807 from a total population of seven hundred thirty three transactions totaling $546,522 for the period under audit for the grant. This testing was performed using a non-statistical sample because sampling risk was not quantified. Questioned Costs: None Effect: The lack of effective control over expenditure requisition approval could lead to misappropriation of federal funds. Cause: Proper internal controls are circumvented to expedite the claims payment process. Repeat: Yes - Years as Repeat Finding: Three 2020-007, 2019-004 and 2018-005. Auditor's Recommendation: The District should create an approved vendor list for reoccurring expenditures and all other expenditures should include an approved requisition form and purchase orders where applicable. Views of Responsible Officials: The District concurs with the finding.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Internal Controls over Expenditures for Allowable Cost/Activities Allowed Federal program information: Funding agency: U.S. Department of Education Title: Impact Aid AL number: 84.041 Award year and number: 2021, S041B-2020-2904 Criteria or Specific Requirement: Effective Internal Controls over expenditures should be properly designed to provide assurance of meeting compliance requirements and should operate effectively. The District's purchasing policies and procedures state, "That all purchases require a purchase requisition approved by the Superintendent". Condition: Purchase Requisitions are not being properly filled and/or approved by the Superintended for each expenditure. In addition, proper documentation is not being retained regarding expenditure transactions. Context: We noted the following deficiencies with major program expenditures: a) Purchase Requisitions should be used to request approval for expenditures and signed by the Superintendent. Out of the forty-two Major Program Expenditure Samples tested, five were missing the requisition form or the superintendent's signature approving the requisition totaling $1,987. It was determined the items were allowable under the grant. b) Invoices were unable to be provided to support the transaction for one of the fortytwo transactions selected for testing totaling $3,600. It was determined the items were allowable under the grant. We tested a sample of forty-two transactions totaling $19,807 from a total population of seven hundred thirty three transactions totaling $546,522 for the period under audit for the grant. This testing was performed using a non-statistical sample because sampling risk was not quantified. Questioned Costs: None Effect: The lack of effective control over expenditure requisition approval could lead to misappropriation of federal funds. Cause: Proper internal controls are circumvented to expedite the claims payment process. Repeat: Yes - Years as Repeat Finding: Three 2020-007, 2019-004 and 2018-005. Auditor's Recommendation: The District should create an approved vendor list for reoccurring expenditures and all other expenditures should include an approved requisition form and purchase orders where applicable. Views of Responsible Officials: The District concurs with the finding.

Corrective Action Plan

2021-007 Condition: Purchase requisitions are not being properly filled and/or approved by the Superintendent for each expenditure. In addition, proper documentation is not being retained regarding expenditure transactions. Auditors' Recommendations: The District should create an approved vendor list for reoccurring expenditures and all other expenditures should include an approved requisition form and purchase order where applicable. Views of Responsible Officials: The Board Chairman concurs with the finding and the Board has made changes during fiscal year 2021-22 and more specifically as of July 1, 2022 to address this on-going finding. The Board has hired a new Business Manager that is well versed on records retention and record management. During the audit period accounts payable invoices and claims processing was reviewed by the District?s Financial Consultant however the previous Business Managers did not file records in a proper manner for audit purposes. (see preface for details). In addition claim forms with approval lines are now in place in the absence of requisitions and purchase orders

Prior Finding References

2020-007

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →
2021-008
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability
MATERIAL WEAKNESSREPEAT

Of the three months selected for testing across nine credit card accounts, the District was unable to provide support and statements for two of the months selected for testing for all nine credit cards. Furthermore, the District was unable to provide purchase authorization for an additional thirteen transactions totaling $3,855. It was determined the thirteen transactions tested without proper authorization were allowable under the grant. Context: We had a discussion with the superintendent and accounting staff and performed a walkthrough over the expenditure process, including credit card transactions. Questioned Costs: None Effect: Without effective internal controls over credit card expenditures, the potential for misstatement due to error or fraud occurring and not being detected greatly increases. Cause: Management did not assign priority to implementing effective internal controls over the credit card expenditure process. There is a lack of monitoring of funds being spent with credit cards. Repeat: Yes - Years as Repeat Finding: One -2020-008. Auditor's Recommendation: We recommend the District strengthen its internal control structure by following the policies and procedures to ensure compliance over expenditures. The District should provide training to management and staff to further their knowledge on internal controls and compliance requirements. Views of Responsible Officials: The District concurs with the finding.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Internal Controls and Compliance over Credit Card Expenditures for Allowable Cost/Activities Allowed Federal program information: Funding agency: Department of Education Title: Impact Aid AL number: 84.041 Award year and number: 2021, S041B-2020-2904 Criteria or Specific Requirement: Effective Internal Controls over credit card expenditures should be properly designed to provide assurance of meeting compliance requirements and should operate effectively. Condition: Of the three months selected for testing across nine credit card accounts, the District was unable to provide support and statements for two of the months selected for testing for all nine credit cards. Furthermore, the District was unable to provide purchase authorization for an additional thirteen transactions totaling $3,855. It was determined the thirteen transactions tested without proper authorization were allowable under the grant. Context: We had a discussion with the superintendent and accounting staff and performed a walkthrough over the expenditure process, including credit card transactions. Questioned Costs: None Effect: Without effective internal controls over credit card expenditures, the potential for misstatement due to error or fraud occurring and not being detected greatly increases. Cause: Management did not assign priority to implementing effective internal controls over the credit card expenditure process. There is a lack of monitoring of funds being spent with credit cards. Repeat: Yes - Years as Repeat Finding: One -2020-008. Auditor's Recommendation: We recommend the District strengthen its internal control structure by following the policies and procedures to ensure compliance over expenditures. The District should provide training to management and staff to further their knowledge on internal controls and compliance requirements. Views of Responsible Officials: The District concurs with the finding.

Corrective Action Plan

2021-008 Condition: Of the three months selected for testing across nine credit card accounts, the District was unable to provide support and statements for two of the months fo testing for all nine credit cards. Furthermore, the District was unable to provide purchase authorization for an additional thirteen transactions totaling $3,855. It was determined that the thirteen transactions tested without proper authorization were allowable under the grant. Auditors' Recommendations: We recommend the District strengthen its internal control structure by following policies and procedures to ensure compliance over expenditures. The District should provide training to management and staff to further their knowledge on internal controls and compliance requirements. Views of Responsible Officials: The Board Chairman concurs with the finding and the Board has made changes during fiscal year 2021-22 and more specifically as of July 1, 2022 to address this on-going finding. The Board has hired a new Business Manager that is well versed on records retention and record management. During the audit period accounts payable invoices and claims processing was reviewed by the District?s Financial Consultant however the previous Business Managers did not file records in a proper manner for audit purposes. (see preface for details).

Prior Finding References

2020-008

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →
2021-009
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability
MATERIAL WEAKNESSREPEAT

Of the forty-two samples tested, fourteen contracts were missing. Context: We had a discussion with the Business Manager and performed a walkthrough on payroll procedures. Payroll testing was performed as a dual test for Compliance and Internal Control Effectiveness as the majority of payroll is paid out of the Impact Aid fund. The samples are not statistically valid samples because sampling risk was not quantified. Questioned Costs: None Effect: Without effective internal controls over payroll, the potential for misstatement due to error or fraud occurring and not being detected greatly increases. Cause: Management did not assign priority to implementing effective internal controls over the payroll process. Employees are working without valid contracts. Repeat: Yes - Years as Repeat Finding: Three 2020-010, 2019-005, 2018-005 Auditor's Recommendation: We recommend the District strengthen its internal control structure by following the policies and procedures manual with regards to payroll. The District should provide training to management and staff to further their knowledge on internal controls and compliance requirements. Views of Responsible Officials: The District concurs with the finding.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Internal Controls and Compliance over Payroll for Allowable Costs/Activities Allowed Federal program information: Funding agency: Department of Education Title: Impact Aid AL number: 84.041 Award year and number: 2021, S041B-2020-2904 Criteria or Specific Requirement: Effective Internal Controls over payroll should be properly designed to provide assurance of meeting compliance requirements and should operate effectively. The District's payroll policies and procedures state that each employee's contract should be signed by the board and the employee. Condition: Of the forty-two samples tested, fourteen contracts were missing. Context: We had a discussion with the Business Manager and performed a walkthrough on payroll procedures. Payroll testing was performed as a dual test for Compliance and Internal Control Effectiveness as the majority of payroll is paid out of the Impact Aid fund. The samples are not statistically valid samples because sampling risk was not quantified. Questioned Costs: None Effect: Without effective internal controls over payroll, the potential for misstatement due to error or fraud occurring and not being detected greatly increases. Cause: Management did not assign priority to implementing effective internal controls over the payroll process. Employees are working without valid contracts. Repeat: Yes - Years as Repeat Finding: Three 2020-010, 2019-005, 2018-005 Auditor's Recommendation: We recommend the District strengthen its internal control structure by following the policies and procedures manual with regards to payroll. The District should provide training to management and staff to further their knowledge on internal controls and compliance requirements. Views of Responsible Officials: The District concurs with the finding.

Corrective Action Plan

2021-009 Condition: Of the forty-two samples tested, fourteen contracts were missing. Auditors' Recommendations: We recommend the District strengthen its internal control structure by following policies and procedures manual with regards to payroll. The District should provide training to management and staff to further their knowledge on internal controls and compliance requirements. Views of Responsible Officials: The Board Chairman, District Clerk, Business Manager and Payroll Clerk concur with the finding. The District Clerk is currently updating personnel files to include all required documents for audit.

Prior Finding References

2020-010

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2020-06-30

FAC accepted this audit on March 30, 2021 — management decision was due September 30, 2021.

2020-007
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability
MATERIAL WEAKNESSREPEAT

Purchase Requisitions are not being properly filled and/or approved by the Superintended for each expenditure. In addition, proper documentation is not being retained regarding expenditure transactions. Context: We noted the following deficiencies with major program expenditures: a) Purchase Requisitions should be used to request approval for expenditures and signed by the Superintendent. Out of the forty-two Major Program Expenditure Samples tested, eight were missing the requisition form or the superintendent's signature approving the requisition totaling $4,881. b) Invoices were unable to be provided to support the transaction for four of the fortytwo transactions selected for testing totaling $4,665. This testing was performed using a non-statistical sample. Questioned Costs: None Effect: The lack of effective control over expenditure requisition approval could lead to misappropriation of federal funds. Cause: Proper internal controls are circumvented to expedite the claims payment process. Repeat: Yes - Years as Repeat Finding: Two 2019-004 and 2018-005. Auditor's Recommendation: The District should create an approved vendor list for reoccurring expenditures and all other expenditures should include an approved requisition form and purchase orders where applicable. Views of Responsible Officials: The District concurs with the finding.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Internal Controls over Expenditures for Allowable Cost/Activities Federal program information: Funding agency: U.S. Department of Education Title: Impact Aid CFDA number: 84.041 Award year and number: 2020, S041B-2020-2904 Criteria or Specific Requirement: Effective Internal Controls over expenditures should be properly designed to provide assurance of meeting compliance requirements and should operate effectively. The District's purchasing policies and procedures state, "That all purchases require a purchase requisition approved by the Superintendent". Condition: Purchase Requisitions are not being properly filled and/or approved by the Superintended for each expenditure. In addition, proper documentation is not being retained regarding expenditure transactions. Context: We noted the following deficiencies with major program expenditures: a) Purchase Requisitions should be used to request approval for expenditures and signed by the Superintendent. Out of the forty-two Major Program Expenditure Samples tested, eight were missing the requisition form or the superintendent's signature approving the requisition totaling $4,881. b) Invoices were unable to be provided to support the transaction for four of the fortytwo transactions selected for testing totaling $4,665. This testing was performed using a non-statistical sample. Questioned Costs: None Effect: The lack of effective control over expenditure requisition approval could lead to misappropriation of federal funds. Cause: Proper internal controls are circumvented to expedite the claims payment process. Repeat: Yes - Years as Repeat Finding: Two 2019-004 and 2018-005. Auditor's Recommendation: The District should create an approved vendor list for reoccurring expenditures and all other expenditures should include an approved requisition form and purchase orders where applicable. Views of Responsible Officials: The District concurs with the finding.

Corrective Action Plan

The District concurs with this finding. The District shall create an approved vendor list for reoccurring expenditures and will be processed by Business Manager/claims clerk. All other expenditures will include an approved requisition form and purchase orders where applicable. All requisitions without supporting documents and proper signatures will not be processed.

Prior Finding References

2019-004

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →
2020-008
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability
MATERIAL WEAKNESSREPEAT

Of the three months selected for testing across five credit card accounts, the District was unable to provide support and statements for two of the months selected for testing. Furthermore, the District was unable to provide purchase authorization for an additional nine transactions totaling $975. Context: We had a discussion with the superintendent and accounting staff and performed a walkthrough over the expenditure process, including credit card transactions. The samples are not statistically valid samples. Questioned Costs: None Effect: Without effective internal controls over credit card expenditures, the potential for misstatement due to error or fraud occurring and not being detected greatly increases. Cause: Management did not assign priority to implementing effective internal controls over the credit card expenditure process. There is a lack of monitoring of funds being spent with credit cards. Repeat: No Auditor's Recommendation: We recommend the District strengthen its internal control structure by following the policies and procedures to ensure compliance over expenditures. The District should provide training to management and staff to further their knowledge on internal controls and compliance requirements. Views of Responsible Officials: The District concurs with the finding.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Internal Controls over Credit Card Expenditures for Allowable Cost/Allowable Activity Federal program information: Funding agency: Department of Education Title: Impact Aid CFDA number: 84.041 Award year and number: 2020, S041B-2020-2904 Criteria or Specific Requirement: Effective Internal Controls over credit card expenditures should be properly designed to provide assurance of meeting compliance requirements and should operate effectively. Condition: Of the three months selected for testing across five credit card accounts, the District was unable to provide support and statements for two of the months selected for testing. Furthermore, the District was unable to provide purchase authorization for an additional nine transactions totaling $975. Context: We had a discussion with the superintendent and accounting staff and performed a walkthrough over the expenditure process, including credit card transactions. The samples are not statistically valid samples. Questioned Costs: None Effect: Without effective internal controls over credit card expenditures, the potential for misstatement due to error or fraud occurring and not being detected greatly increases. Cause: Management did not assign priority to implementing effective internal controls over the credit card expenditure process. There is a lack of monitoring of funds being spent with credit cards. Repeat: No Auditor's Recommendation: We recommend the District strengthen its internal control structure by following the policies and procedures to ensure compliance over expenditures. The District should provide training to management and staff to further their knowledge on internal controls and compliance requirements. Views of Responsible Officials: The District concurs with the finding.

Corrective Action Plan

The District concurs with the finding. The District will enforce its existing internal control structure by following the policies and procedures to ensure compliance over expenditures. The District will provide training to management and staff to further their knowledge on internal controls and compliance requirements.

Prior Finding References

2019-004

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →
2020-009
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability
MATERIAL WEAKNESS

During our testing of travel expenditures, we noted that the District was unable to provide any support for four transactions totaling $722, and authorization for six transactions totaling $1,862. Context: We performed a walkthrough of expenditure transactions and selected forty transactions to test for federal compliance totaling $9,866. This testing was performed using a non-statistical sample. Questioned Costs: None. Effect: The lack of effective control over expenditure requisition approval could lead to misappropriation of federal funds. Cause: Proper internal controls are circumvented to expedite the claims payment process. Repeat: Yes - Years as Repeat Finding: Two 2019-004, 2018-005 Auditor's Recommendation: The District should create an approved vendor list for recurring expenditures and all other expenditures should include an approval requisition form and purchase order where applicable. Views of Responsible Officials: The District concurs with the finding.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Internal Controls over Travel Expenditures for Allowable Costs/Activities Federal program information: Funding agency: U.S. Department of Education Title: Impact Aid CFDA number: 84.041 Award year and number: 2020, S041B-2020-2904 Criteria or Specific Requirement: Effective Internal Controls over expenditures should be properly designed to provide assurance of meeting compliance requirements and should operate effectively. The District's purchasing policies and procedures state, "That all purchases require a purchase requisition approved by the Superintendent". Condition: During our testing of travel expenditures, we noted that the District was unable to provide any support for four transactions totaling $722, and authorization for six transactions totaling $1,862. Context: We performed a walkthrough of expenditure transactions and selected forty transactions to test for federal compliance totaling $9,866. This testing was performed using a non-statistical sample. Questioned Costs: None. Effect: The lack of effective control over expenditure requisition approval could lead to misappropriation of federal funds. Cause: Proper internal controls are circumvented to expedite the claims payment process. Repeat: Yes - Years as Repeat Finding: Two 2019-004, 2018-005 Auditor's Recommendation: The District should create an approved vendor list for recurring expenditures and all other expenditures should include an approval requisition form and purchase order where applicable. Views of Responsible Officials: The District concurs with the finding.

Corrective Action Plan

The District concurs with this finding. The District should create an approved vendor list for recurring expenditures and all other expenditures should include an approval requisition form and purchase order where applicable. All requisitions without supporting documents and proper signatures will not be processed.

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →
2020-010
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability
MATERIAL WEAKNESSREPEAT

Of the forty-two samples tested, fourteen contracts were missing, and six were either not signed by the board or the employee totaling $4,652. Context: We had a discussion with the Business Manager and performed a walkthrough on payroll procedures. Payroll testing was performed as a dual test for Compliance and Internal Control Effectiveness as the majority of payroll is paid out of the Impact Aid fund. The samples are not statistically valid samples. Questioned Costs: None Effect: Without effective internal controls over payroll, the potential for misstatement due to error or fraud occuring and not being detected greatly increases. Cause: Management did not assign priority to implementing effective internal controls over the payroll process. Employees are working without valid contracts. Repeat: Yes - Years as Repeat Finding: Two 2019-005, 2018-005 Auditor's Recommendation: We recommend the District strengthen its internal control structure by following the policies and procedures manual with regards to payroll. The District should provide training to management and staff to further their knowledge on internal controls and compliance requirements. Views of Responsible Officials: The District concurs with the finding.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Internal Controls over Payroll for Allowable Costs/Allowable Activities Federal program information: Funding agency: Department of Education Title: Impact Aid CFDA number: 84.041 Award year and number: 2020 S041B-2020-2904 Criteria or Specific Requirement: Effective Internal Controls over payroll should be properly designed to provide assurance of meeting compliance requirements and should operate effectively. The District's payroll policies and procedures state that each employee's contract should be signed by the board and the employee. Condition: Of the forty-two samples tested, fourteen contracts were missing, and six were either not signed by the board or the employee totaling $4,652. Context: We had a discussion with the Business Manager and performed a walkthrough on payroll procedures. Payroll testing was performed as a dual test for Compliance and Internal Control Effectiveness as the majority of payroll is paid out of the Impact Aid fund. The samples are not statistically valid samples. Questioned Costs: None Effect: Without effective internal controls over payroll, the potential for misstatement due to error or fraud occuring and not being detected greatly increases. Cause: Management did not assign priority to implementing effective internal controls over the payroll process. Employees are working without valid contracts. Repeat: Yes - Years as Repeat Finding: Two 2019-005, 2018-005 Auditor's Recommendation: We recommend the District strengthen its internal control structure by following the policies and procedures manual with regards to payroll. The District should provide training to management and staff to further their knowledge on internal controls and compliance requirements. Views of Responsible Officials: The District concurs with the finding.

Corrective Action Plan

The District concurs with this finding. The District will strengthen its internal control structure by following the policies and procedures manual with regards to payroll. The District will provide training to management and staff to further their knowledge on internal controls and compliance requirements. A check list will be provided by HR and Business office will stamped complete before filing.

Prior Finding References

2019-005

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2019-06-30

FAC accepted this audit on March 30, 2020 — management decision was due September 30, 2020.

2019-004
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability
MATERIAL WEAKNESSREPEAT

Purchase Requisitions are not being properly filled and/or approved by the Superintended for each expenditure. Context: Purchase Requisitions should be used to request approval for expenditures and signed by the Superintendent. Out of the 40 Major Program Expenditure Samples tested, 12 were missing the requisition form or the superintendent's signature approving the requisition. This testing was performed using a non-statistical sample. Questioned Costs: None Effect: The lack of effective control over expenditure requisition approval could lead to misappropriation of federal funds. Cause: Proper internal controls are circumvented to expedite the claims payment process. Repeat: Yes - Years as Repeat Finding: One - 2018-005 Auditor's Recommendation: The District should create an approved vendor list for reoccurring expenditures and all other expenditures should include an approved requisition form and Purchase Order where applicable.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Criteria or Specific Requirement: Effective Internal Controls over expenditures should be properly designed to provide assurance of meeting compliance requirements and should operate effectively. The District's purchasing policies and procedures state, "That all purchases require a purchase requisition approved by the Superintendent". Condition: Purchase Requisitions are not being properly filled and/or approved by the Superintended for each expenditure. Context: Purchase Requisitions should be used to request approval for expenditures and signed by the Superintendent. Out of the 40 Major Program Expenditure Samples tested, 12 were missing the requisition form or the superintendent's signature approving the requisition. This testing was performed using a non-statistical sample. Questioned Costs: None Effect: The lack of effective control over expenditure requisition approval could lead to misappropriation of federal funds. Cause: Proper internal controls are circumvented to expedite the claims payment process. Repeat: Yes - Years as Repeat Finding: One - 2018-005 Auditor's Recommendation: The District should create an approved vendor list for reoccurring expenditures and all other expenditures should include an approved requisition form and Purchase Order where applicable.

Corrective Action Plan

The District concurs with the finding and is now utilizing the purchase requisition and purchase order software provided by Black Mountain Software. Efforts are being made to require requisitions for travel, supplies, equipment, and services prior to the commitment of funds via the purchase order system.

Prior Finding References

2018-005

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →
2019-005
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability
MATERIAL WEAKNESSREPEAT

Of the 30 payroll samples tested, 8 contracts were missing either board or employee signatures. Context: We had a discussion with the superintendent and accounting staff and performed a walkthrough over the payroll process. Payroll Testing was performed as a dual test for Compliance and Intern Control Effectiveness as the majority of payroll is paid out of Impact Aid Funds. The samples are not statistically valid samples. Questioned Costs: None Effect: Without effective internal controls over payroll, the potential for misstatement due to error or fraud occurring and not being detected greatly increases. Cause: Management did not assign priority to implementing effective internal controls over the payroll process. Employees are working without valid contracts. Repeat: Yes - Years as Repeat Finding: One - 2018-005 Auditor's Recommendation: We recommend the District strengthen its internal control structure by following the policies and procedures to ensure compliance over payroll. The District should provide training to management and staff to further their knowledge on internal controls and compliance requirements.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Criteria or Specific Requirement: Effective Internal Controls over payroll should be properly designed to provide assurance of meeting compliance requirements and should operate effectively. The Districts payroll policies and procedures state that each employee's contract should be signed by the board and the employee. Condition: Of the 30 payroll samples tested, 8 contracts were missing either board or employee signatures. Context: We had a discussion with the superintendent and accounting staff and performed a walkthrough over the payroll process. Payroll Testing was performed as a dual test for Compliance and Intern Control Effectiveness as the majority of payroll is paid out of Impact Aid Funds. The samples are not statistically valid samples. Questioned Costs: None Effect: Without effective internal controls over payroll, the potential for misstatement due to error or fraud occurring and not being detected greatly increases. Cause: Management did not assign priority to implementing effective internal controls over the payroll process. Employees are working without valid contracts. Repeat: Yes - Years as Repeat Finding: One - 2018-005 Auditor's Recommendation: We recommend the District strengthen its internal control structure by following the policies and procedures to ensure compliance over payroll. The District should provide training to management and staff to further their knowledge on internal controls and compliance requirements.

Corrective Action Plan

The District concurs with the finding. As of July 1, 2019, the District has re-assigned personnel in the Business Office to perform specific duties. The Business Manager/Clerk will now maintain contract files and employee files. The Payroll Clerk will ensure all contracts have appropriate signatures of employees and board before processing any pay.

Prior Finding References

2018-005

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2018-06-30

FAC accepted this audit on November 17, 2019 — management decision was due May 17, 2020.

2018-005
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability
MATERIAL WEAKNESSQUESTIONED COSTS
Show full finding ▾

FY 2017-06-30

FAC accepted this audit on March 28, 2018 — management decision was due September 28, 2018.

2017-004
Reporting

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Reporting →

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and compliance status.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.