AHSTW Community School District

EIN: 811134269

UEI: SR91JA37VAS8

Data as of August 23, 2026

AHSTW Community School District3 audit years3 findings1 repeat
3
Audit Years
3
Total Findings
1
Repeat Findings

FY 2023-06-30

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on January 24, 2024. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by July 24, 2024 (761 days ago).

What is a management decision? →
2023-003
Other

Segregation of Duties – The District did not properly segregate, record-keeping and reconciling functions for receipts and disbursements, including those related to federal programs.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Segregation of Duties – The District did not properly segregate, record-keeping and reconciling functions for receipts and disbursements, including those related to federal programs.

Corrective Action Plan

See Report

About Other →

FY 2022-06-30

FAC accepted this audit on February 14, 2023 — management decision was due August 14, 2023.

2022-003
Other
REPEAT

AL Number 10.553: School Breakfast Program

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

AL Number 10.553: School Breakfast Program

Corrective Action Plan

See Corrective Action Plan for chart/table"

Prior Finding References

2021-002

About Other →

FY 2021-06-30

FAC accepted this audit on January 10, 2022 — management decision was due July 10, 2022.

2021-001
Other

Segregation of Duties Criteria ? Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining internal control. A good system of internal control provides for adequate segregation of duties so no one individual handles a transaction from its inception to completion. In order to maintain proper internal control, duties should be segregated so the authorization, custody and recording of transactions are not under the control of the same employee. This segregation of duties helps prevent losses from employee error or dishonesty and maximizes the accuracy of the District?s financial statements. Condition ? Investment transactions, reconciling, journal entry writing, approving and posting, and financial reporting are performed by the same person Cause ? The District has a limited number of employees and procedures have not been designed to adequately segregate duties or provide compensating controls through additional oversight of transactions and processes. Effect ? Inadequate segregation of duties could adversely affect the District?s ability to prevent or detect and correct misstatements, errors or misappropriation on a timely basis by employee in the normal course of performing their assigned functions. Recommendation ? We realize segregation of duties is difficult with a limited number of office employees. However, the District should review its procedures to obtain the maximum internal control possible under the circumstances utilizing currently available staff, including elected officials. Response and Corrective Action Plan ? We will continue to review our procedures and implement additional controls where possible. Conclusion ? Response accepted.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Segregation of Duties Criteria ? Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining internal control. A good system of internal control provides for adequate segregation of duties so no one individual handles a transaction from its inception to completion. In order to maintain proper internal control, duties should be segregated so the authorization, custody and recording of transactions are not under the control of the same employee. This segregation of duties helps prevent losses from employee error or dishonesty and maximizes the accuracy of the District?s financial statements. Condition ? Investment transactions, reconciling, journal entry writing, approving and posting, and financial reporting are performed by the same person Cause ? The District has a limited number of employees and procedures have not been designed to adequately segregate duties or provide compensating controls through additional oversight of transactions and processes. Effect ? Inadequate segregation of duties could adversely affect the District?s ability to prevent or detect and correct misstatements, errors or misappropriation on a timely basis by employee in the normal course of performing their assigned functions. Recommendation ? We realize segregation of duties is difficult with a limited number of office employees. However, the District should review its procedures to obtain the maximum internal control possible under the circumstances utilizing currently available staff, including elected officials. Response and Corrective Action Plan ? We will continue to review our procedures and implement additional controls where possible. Conclusion ? Response accepted.

Corrective Action Plan

We will continue to review our procedures and implement additional controls where possible.

About Other →

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and compliance status.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.