San Benito High School DistrictLocal Government

EIN: 770208520

UEI: MCMDKCJDEDL4

Audited by: Eide Bailly

Oversight agency: 84 [Department of Education]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of August 28, 2026

San Benito High School District10 audit years1 findings
10
Audit Years
1
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings

FY 2024-06-30

$4,345,396 federal awards expended

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on January 15, 2025. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by July 15, 2025 (409 days ago).

What is a management decision? →
2024-002
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability
MATERIAL WEAKNESS

Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Pass-Through Entity: California Department of Education (CDE) Program Name: Education Stabilization Funds Federal Financial Assistance Listing: 84.425 Compliance Requirement: Reporting Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Controls over Compliance Pass-Through Entity Number: 15547, 15559, 10155 Criteria or Specific Requirements Local education agencies must comply with all reporting requirements that the Department of Education may reasonably require. Section 15011 of Division B of the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act requires that a grantee submit annual reports. In addition, the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.303 Internal Controls, requires that the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain documentation of effective internal controls over Federal awards that provide reasonable assurance that awards are being managed in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition During our testing over reporting of the Education Stabilization Fund awards, we noted that the District did complete the required annual reports on time. However, the District reported the accumulation of the previous quarterly reports rather than the final end of year accumulation. This did not agree with the most up to date general ledger reports that supported the prior year ending Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) amounts, which should have been the proper amounts reported on the annual expenditure reports. ESSER II, Resource 3212, reported expenditures of $722,258 while the SEFA reported $669,132. ESSER III, Resource 3213, reported expenditures of $1,431,131 while the SEFA reported $758,961. ESSER III ‐ Learning Loss, Resource 3214, reported expenditures of $290,289 while the SEFA reported $275,644.Cause The condition identified appears to have materialized due to the Business Services personnel not following their internal control policies and procedures of using the most up to date general ledger reports when preparing their annual expenditure reports. Effect The District did not comply with the reporting requirements as specified by the California Department of Education, as well as the internal control requirements for Federal awards. Questioned Costs Since the correct expenditures were reported on the SEFA, and the annual expenditure reports were only off due to incorrect dates being used to run the general ledger reports, the likely questioned cost will be $0. Context/Sampling: The District did not comply with the reporting requirements as specified by the California Department of Education because of the incorrect date used to run reports. Repeat Finding No Recommendation The District should review their policies and procedures related to required reporting requirements of federal awards and ensure that general ledger reports being used are the most accurate and up to date reports.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Pass-Through Entity: California Department of Education (CDE) Program Name: Education Stabilization Funds Federal Financial Assistance Listing: 84.425 Compliance Requirement: Reporting Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Controls over Compliance Pass-Through Entity Number: 15547, 15559, 10155 Criteria or Specific Requirements Local education agencies must comply with all reporting requirements that the Department of Education may reasonably require. Section 15011 of Division B of the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act requires that a grantee submit annual reports. In addition, the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.303 Internal Controls, requires that the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain documentation of effective internal controls over Federal awards that provide reasonable assurance that awards are being managed in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition During our testing over reporting of the Education Stabilization Fund awards, we noted that the District did complete the required annual reports on time. However, the District reported the accumulation of the previous quarterly reports rather than the final end of year accumulation. This did not agree with the most up to date general ledger reports that supported the prior year ending Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) amounts, which should have been the proper amounts reported on the annual expenditure reports. ESSER II, Resource 3212, reported expenditures of $722,258 while the SEFA reported $669,132. ESSER III, Resource 3213, reported expenditures of $1,431,131 while the SEFA reported $758,961. ESSER III ‐ Learning Loss, Resource 3214, reported expenditures of $290,289 while the SEFA reported $275,644.Cause The condition identified appears to have materialized due to the Business Services personnel not following their internal control policies and procedures of using the most up to date general ledger reports when preparing their annual expenditure reports. Effect The District did not comply with the reporting requirements as specified by the California Department of Education, as well as the internal control requirements for Federal awards. Questioned Costs Since the correct expenditures were reported on the SEFA, and the annual expenditure reports were only off due to incorrect dates being used to run the general ledger reports, the likely questioned cost will be $0. Context/Sampling: The District did not comply with the reporting requirements as specified by the California Department of Education because of the incorrect date used to run reports. Repeat Finding No Recommendation The District should review their policies and procedures related to required reporting requirements of federal awards and ensure that general ledger reports being used are the most accurate and up to date reports.

Corrective Action Plan

Corrective Action Plan and Views of Responsible Officials The District will review their policies and procedures related to required reporting requirements of federal awards and ensure that general ledger reports being used are the most accurate and up to date reports at the time the reports are prepared and maintain those copies as support for the report should subsequent adjustments or transfers happen within those programs being reported.

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.