EIN: 756001094
UEI: K4WYN62N92R1
Data as of August 22, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on January 6, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by July 6, 2026 (47 days ago).
What is a management decision? →The County did not have a formally adopted written policy, or documented procedures governing its procurement processes. Criteria: Federal and state laws, regulations, and sound business practices require entities to maintain internal controls over procurement. Specifically, Government Accountability Office (GAO) guidance and the Green Book, Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government, emphasize the need for documenting internal controls, including those related to acquisition processes, to ensure that transactions are executed in accordance with management's directives and applicable laws. Cause: Management did not prioritize the formal development and adoption of a procurement policy. This way primarily due to a lack of awareness regarding the internal control risks associated with undocumented procurement procedures and the assumption that existing informal practices were sufficient. Effect: Without a written procurement policy, the entity is exposed to significant risks of fraud, waste, and abuse. This condition could lead to (1) Noncompliance with regulations: Inconsistent or undocumented procurement actions may not meet the requirements of federal or state grants, potentially leading to questioned costs or the return of funds.; (2) Inefficient use of resources: The absence of a competitive process, such as soliciting multiple bids, can result in higher costs for goods and services; (3) Increased risk of fraud: Weak internal controls over purchasing increase the risk of fraudulent activities, such as collusion, kickbacks, or purchasing from unapproved vendors; (4) Reduced accountability: The lack of documentation prevents a clear audit trail, making it difficult to hold staff accountable for procurement decisions. Recommendation: We recommend that management immediately develop and formally adopt a comprehensive procurement policy and procedures manual. The manual, at a minimum, should include: (1) clear guidelines for soliciting bids and proposals, including requirements for full and open competition; (2) Documentation standards for all procurement actions, including vendor selection rationale and price comparisons; (3) Approval authority levels for different procurement thresholds, and (4) A process for monitoring compliance with the new policy. Management's Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management will draft a policy related to its procurement and will take it to the county commissioners for approval.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Condition: The County did not have a formally adopted written policy, or documented procedures governing its procurement processes. Criteria: Federal and state laws, regulations, and sound business practices require entities to maintain internal controls over procurement. Specifically, Government Accountability Office (GAO) guidance and the Green Book, Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government, emphasize the need for documenting internal controls, including those related to acquisition processes, to ensure that transactions are executed in accordance with management's directives and applicable laws. Cause: Management did not prioritize the formal development and adoption of a procurement policy. This way primarily due to a lack of awareness regarding the internal control risks associated with undocumented procurement procedures and the assumption that existing informal practices were sufficient. Effect: Without a written procurement policy, the entity is exposed to significant risks of fraud, waste, and abuse. This condition could lead to (1) Noncompliance with regulations: Inconsistent or undocumented procurement actions may not meet the requirements of federal or state grants, potentially leading to questioned costs or the return of funds.; (2) Inefficient use of resources: The absence of a competitive process, such as soliciting multiple bids, can result in higher costs for goods and services; (3) Increased risk of fraud: Weak internal controls over purchasing increase the risk of fraudulent activities, such as collusion, kickbacks, or purchasing from unapproved vendors; (4) Reduced accountability: The lack of documentation prevents a clear audit trail, making it difficult to hold staff accountable for procurement decisions. Recommendation: We recommend that management immediately develop and formally adopt a comprehensive procurement policy and procedures manual. The manual, at a minimum, should include: (1) clear guidelines for soliciting bids and proposals, including requirements for full and open competition; (2) Documentation standards for all procurement actions, including vendor selection rationale and price comparisons; (3) Approval authority levels for different procurement thresholds, and (4) A process for monitoring compliance with the new policy. Management's Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management will draft a policy related to its procurement and will take it to the county commissioners for approval.
Management will draft a policy related to its procurement and will take it to the County Commissioners for approval
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Monitor subrecipient audit findings and compliance status.
Start monitoring →© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.