FORT WORTH TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY

EIN: 752793063

UEI: GG83JKUFM1G1

Data as of August 26, 2026

FORT WORTH TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY10 audit years3 findings
10
Audit Years
3
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings

FY 2024-09-30

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on March 19, 2025. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by September 19, 2025 (342 days ago).

What is a management decision? →
2024-002
Cost Allowability / Cash Management / Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking
QUESTIONED COSTS

(X) Compliance Finding (X) Significant Deficiency ( ) Material Weakness Context/Cause: Grant agreements were not reviewed in enough detail to assess appropriateness of rate being charged to the major program prior to submission of request for reimbursement. Request for reimbursement was up to 51% of total expenses incurred but instead a reimbursement rate of 80% was used for grant 2017-001. Effect and Questioned Costs: The absence of detailed review related to cost reimbursement rates significantly increases the risk that misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected timely. Known questioned costs are $613,075. Likely questioned costs are indeterminable. Recommendation: Management should reinforce the internal controls in place to ensure all reimbursement rates are reviewed on a monthly basis as part of the month end close process prior to grant billing. Responsible Official’s Response: See Corrective Action Plan

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding 2024-002: Matching Major Federal Program – Federal Transit Cluster Compliance Requirements: Allowable Costs and Cost Principles, Cash Management, Matching Criteria: In accordance with the grant agreement and Uniform Guidance, effective internal controls must be in place to prevent and detect noncompliance. This requirement extends to costs requested for reimbursement under federal grants. Condition: (X) Compliance Finding (X) Significant Deficiency ( ) Material Weakness Context/Cause: Grant agreements were not reviewed in enough detail to assess appropriateness of rate being charged to the major program prior to submission of request for reimbursement. Request for reimbursement was up to 51% of total expenses incurred but instead a reimbursement rate of 80% was used for grant 2017-001. Effect and Questioned Costs: The absence of detailed review related to cost reimbursement rates significantly increases the risk that misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected timely. Known questioned costs are $613,075. Likely questioned costs are indeterminable. Recommendation: Management should reinforce the internal controls in place to ensure all reimbursement rates are reviewed on a monthly basis as part of the month end close process prior to grant billing. Responsible Official’s Response: See Corrective Action Plan

Corrective Action Plan

Finding 2024-002: Matching Major Federal Program: Federal Transit Cluster Compliance Requirements: Allowable Costs and Cost Principles, Cash Management, Matching Response: Concur: An inaccurate reimbursement rate was applied causing overpayment of $613,075. Due to the inaccuracy of the percentage rate applied in this drawdown, Trinity Metro will actively reinforce its internal control processes to ensure detailed reviews related to cost reimbursement rates are accurately identified monthly by those who are authorized to process drawdowns. Implementation will take place immediately. Steps that will be taken include: 􀁸 Dual-Approval Process for Reimbursement Requests: Both the Grants Department and Accounting will confirm the accuracy of the reimbursement rate before submission. 􀁸 Grant Agreement Review Process: Both the Grants Department and Accounting will jointly review grant agreements before submitting reimbursement requests to ensure that the correct rate if applied. Date of Completion: This action plan will go into effect immediately. Person Responsible to Ensure Completion: Contact Person: Greg Jordan, Chief Financial Officer Contact Person: Eva Williams, Director of Budget and Grants, Finance

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles, Cash Management, Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking →

FY 2018-09-30

FAC accepted this audit on November 19, 2019 — management decision was due May 19, 2020.

2018-003
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability
MATERIAL WEAKNESS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2016-09-30

FAC accepted this audit on November 6, 2017 — management decision was due May 6, 2018.

2016-005
Reporting
MATERIAL WEAKNESS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Reporting →

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and compliance status.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.