EIN: 726000903
UEI: D6AXPR2LET33
Data as of August 26, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on December 11, 2025. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by June 11, 2026 (77 days ago).
What is a management decision? →Reference # and Title: 2025-004 Reporting Federal Grantor/Program Name Award Year Assistance Listing No. Congressionally Mandated Projects 2024 66.202 Criteria or specific requirement: Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Costs Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) Subpart D Section 306(b)(5) states "For all Federal Awards, the Federal agency or pass-through entity must accept any cost sharing funds (including cash and third-party in-kind contributions, and also including funds committed by the recipient, subrecipient, or third parties) as part of the recipient's or subrecipient's contributions to a program when the funds are not paid by the Federal Government under another Federal award, except where the program's Federal authorizing statute specifically provides that Federal funds made available for the program can be applied to cost sharing requirements of other Federal Programs." Condition found: The City had adequate local matching funds to meet the matching grant requirements for both grants. However, the claims for reimbursement report included funds as matching that were used as matching or cost reimbursement under another Federal grant. Context: The rnatching funds on the claims for reimbursement report was tested by comparing amounts reimbursed under another Federal grant. Possible asserted effect (cause and effect): Cause: Records that support federal grant reimbursements were not reviewed thoroughly to provide other local matching funds on the claims for reimbursement report. Effect: The claims for reimbursement report did not report matching funds correctly. Recommendation to prevent future occurrences: Underlying records that support Federal grant reimbursements and matching funds used should be reviewed carefully to mitigate the reporting of the same rnatching or reimbursement funds on more than one Federal grant. Origination date and prior year reference (if applicable): This finding originated in the fiscal year ended April 30, 2025. View of responsible official: See auditee prepared corrective action plan included later in this report as "Corrective Action Plan for Current Year Findings and Questioned Costs."
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Reference # and Title: 2025-004 Reporting Federal Grantor/Program Name Award Year Assistance Listing No. Congressionally Mandated Projects 2024 66.202 Criteria or specific requirement: Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Costs Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) Subpart D Section 306(b)(5) states "For all Federal Awards, the Federal agency or pass-through entity must accept any cost sharing funds (including cash and third-party in-kind contributions, and also including funds committed by the recipient, subrecipient, or third parties) as part of the recipient's or subrecipient's contributions to a program when the funds are not paid by the Federal Government under another Federal award, except where the program's Federal authorizing statute specifically provides that Federal funds made available for the program can be applied to cost sharing requirements of other Federal Programs." Condition found: The City had adequate local matching funds to meet the matching grant requirements for both grants. However, the claims for reimbursement report included funds as matching that were used as matching or cost reimbursement under another Federal grant. Context: The rnatching funds on the claims for reimbursement report was tested by comparing amounts reimbursed under another Federal grant. Possible asserted effect (cause and effect): Cause: Records that support federal grant reimbursements were not reviewed thoroughly to provide other local matching funds on the claims for reimbursement report. Effect: The claims for reimbursement report did not report matching funds correctly. Recommendation to prevent future occurrences: Underlying records that support Federal grant reimbursements and matching funds used should be reviewed carefully to mitigate the reporting of the same rnatching or reimbursement funds on more than one Federal grant. Origination date and prior year reference (if applicable): This finding originated in the fiscal year ended April 30, 2025. View of responsible official: See auditee prepared corrective action plan included later in this report as "Corrective Action Plan for Current Year Findings and Questioned Costs."
Corrective action plan: The City plans to implement the following procedures: Remedial Steps Financial Reconciliation and Adjustment * Quantify Questioned Costs: Immediately calculate the exact dollar amount of Federal funds improperly claimed as matching for the current grant and the previous grant(s). This step should take place within 30 days of report issue date * Correct Claims/Reports: Submit necessary adjusted financial reports/claims for reimbursement to the Federal Grantor and/or pass-Through Entity for the affected grants, replacing the unallowable Federal match with an eligible, documented non-Federal match source (or repaying the Federal portion if no eligible local match is available). This step should take place within 60 days of report issue date Future Prevention Training and Certification * Mandatory Training: Conduct mandatory training for all Grant Managers on 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart D within 90 days of report issue date. Policy and Procedure Establishment *Grants Management Policy: Develop and implement a written policy requiring all grant personnel to: a) Track and document the funding source (Federal or Non-Federal) of all matching contributions, and b) Obtain senior finance sign-off on all matching documentation before submission of any reimbursement claim, confirming compliance with 2 CFR 20.306 within 12 days of report issue date. * Tracking: Improve existing tracking system to ensure expenditure is distinctly separated from all Federal costs and not cross-claimed between awards. Within 60 days of report issue date Person reponsible for corrective action: C. Morgan McCallister, PE, City Engineer Amber L. Sellers, Grant Manager Anticipated completion date: Overall within 120 of report issue date. See Correction Action Plan for milestone timeframes.
FAC accepted this audit on January 13, 2021 — management decision was due July 13, 2021.
Reference # and Title: 2020-002 Cash Management on Federal Programs CFDA#, Federal Award Title, Federal Agency, Federal Award # and Year, and the name of Pass-Through Entity: This finding relates to: Federal Transit Cluster - CFDA# 20.507 for the Federal Award Years 2017 and 2018 received from Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Transportation. Airport Improvement Program - CFDA# 20.106 for the Federal Award Years 2017 and 2020 received from Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Transportation. Delta Regional Area Economic Development - CFDA# 90.201 for the Federal Award Year 2016 received from Federal Agency: Delta Regional Authority Criteria or specific requirement: In accordance with requirements of 2 CFR section 200.305, non-Federal entities must establish written procedures over cash management, which includes criteria of how the entity will minimize the time elapsing between the transfer from the federal awarding agency and the disbursement of funds for the program costs. Controls over cash management should include reviews over the claims for reimbursement before submission to the federal awarding agency as well as amounts being requested should be adequately recorded in the proper period. Condition found: In testing seven claims for reimbursement for the Federal Transit Cluster, it was noted that four claims for reimbursement were not approved before submission to the federal awarding agency. In addition, it was noted that two claims for reimbursement were not posted in the correct accounting period. In testing seven claims for reimbursement for the Airport Improvement Program, it was noted that one claim for reimbursement was not recorded in the correct accounting period and one claim for reimbursement did not agree with supporting documentation, which resulted in the City requesting more than the actual expenditures. In testing three claims for reimbursement for the Delta Regional Area Economic Development Program, it was noted that two claims for reimbursement included expenditures not posted in the correct accounting period. Context: Seventeen claims for reimbursement were selected for testing over the federal programs, which resulted in approximately 77% of the expenditures for the three programs reported on the schedule of expenditures of federal awards being tested. Possible asserted effect (cause and effect): Cause: The auditor was unable to determine the cause. Effect: The City is not in compliance with federal compliance requirements related to cash management. Recommendation to prevent future occurrences: The City should establish additional procedures over the federal programs to ensure all claims for reimbursements are adequately reviewed and approved. Furthermore, procedures should be established to ensure claims for reimbursement agree to supporting documentation and are adequately recorded and reported in the correct accounting period. Origination date and prior year reference (if applicable): This finding originated in the fiscal year ended April 30, 2020. View of responsible official: See auditee prepared corrective action plan included later in this report as ?Corrective Action Plan for Current Year Findings and Questioned Costs.?
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Reference # and Title: 2020-002 Cash Management on Federal Programs CFDA#, Federal Award Title, Federal Agency, Federal Award # and Year, and the name of Pass-Through Entity: This finding relates to: Federal Transit Cluster - CFDA# 20.507 for the Federal Award Years 2017 and 2018 received from Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Transportation. Airport Improvement Program - CFDA# 20.106 for the Federal Award Years 2017 and 2020 received from Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Transportation. Delta Regional Area Economic Development - CFDA# 90.201 for the Federal Award Year 2016 received from Federal Agency: Delta Regional Authority Criteria or specific requirement: In accordance with requirements of 2 CFR section 200.305, non-Federal entities must establish written procedures over cash management, which includes criteria of how the entity will minimize the time elapsing between the transfer from the federal awarding agency and the disbursement of funds for the program costs. Controls over cash management should include reviews over the claims for reimbursement before submission to the federal awarding agency as well as amounts being requested should be adequately recorded in the proper period. Condition found: In testing seven claims for reimbursement for the Federal Transit Cluster, it was noted that four claims for reimbursement were not approved before submission to the federal awarding agency. In addition, it was noted that two claims for reimbursement were not posted in the correct accounting period. In testing seven claims for reimbursement for the Airport Improvement Program, it was noted that one claim for reimbursement was not recorded in the correct accounting period and one claim for reimbursement did not agree with supporting documentation, which resulted in the City requesting more than the actual expenditures. In testing three claims for reimbursement for the Delta Regional Area Economic Development Program, it was noted that two claims for reimbursement included expenditures not posted in the correct accounting period. Context: Seventeen claims for reimbursement were selected for testing over the federal programs, which resulted in approximately 77% of the expenditures for the three programs reported on the schedule of expenditures of federal awards being tested. Possible asserted effect (cause and effect): Cause: The auditor was unable to determine the cause. Effect: The City is not in compliance with federal compliance requirements related to cash management. Recommendation to prevent future occurrences: The City should establish additional procedures over the federal programs to ensure all claims for reimbursements are adequately reviewed and approved. Furthermore, procedures should be established to ensure claims for reimbursement agree to supporting documentation and are adequately recorded and reported in the correct accounting period. Origination date and prior year reference (if applicable): This finding originated in the fiscal year ended April 30, 2020. View of responsible official: See auditee prepared corrective action plan included later in this report as ?Corrective Action Plan for Current Year Findings and Questioned Costs.?
2020-002: Cash Management on Federal Programs. The City will establish additional procedures over the federal programs to ensure all claims for reimbursements are adequately reviewed and approved. The City will also review its procedures and make necessary adjustments to ensure claims for reimbursement agree to supporting documentation and are adequately recorded in the correct accounting period. Person responsible for corrective action: Melanie Watson Director of Accounting Telephone:(318) 329-3345 City of Monroe P. O. Box 123 Monroe, Louisiana 71210 Anticipated completion date: April 2021
FAC accepted this audit on November 19, 2019 — management decision was due May 19, 2020.
2019-003 Reference # and Title: 2019-003 Airport Improvement Program ? Cash Management CFDA#, Federal Award Title, Federal Agency, Federal Award # and Year, and the name of Pass-Through Entity: This finding relates to the Airport Improvement Program - CFDA# 20.106 for the Federal Award Years 2017 and 2018 received from Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Transportation. Criteria or specific requirement: In accordance with requirements of 2 CFR section 200.305, non-Federal entities must establish written procedures over cash management, which includes criteria of how the entity will minimize the time elapsing between the transfer from the federal awarding agency and the disbursement of funds for the program costs. Condition found: In testing cash management, it was noted that the City?s written policy nor procedures over cash management address the amount of time between the transfer from the federal awarding agency and the disbursement of funds for the program costs. Although the amount of time isn?t reflected in the policy, the industry normal standards are three days between the time the transfer from the federal awarding agency was received and the payment of program costs, if the payment wasn?t paid before the monies were requested from the federal awarding agency. However, in testing ten disbursements, it was noted that, for three disbursements, the time between the transfer from the federal awarding agency and the payment of program costs was more than three days. Context: Ten expenditures tested, which represented 67% of the grant. Possible asserted effect (cause and effect): Cause: The auditor was unable to determine the cause. Effect: The City is not in compliance with federal compliance requirements related to cash management. Recommendation to prevent future occurrences: The City should establish written policies and procedures over cash management in order to eliminate uncertainty as well as establish quality control procedures to ensure the policies are being adhere to. Specifically, the City should define the number of days that they consider reasonable for payment of invoices/charges after the date of the collection of the Federal Award. Origination date and prior year reference (if applicable): This finding originated fiscal year end April 30, 2019. View of responsible official: See auditee prepared corrective action plan included later in this report as ?Corrective Action Plan for Current Year Findings and Questioned Costs.?
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴2019-003 Reference # and Title: 2019-003 Airport Improvement Program ? Cash Management CFDA#, Federal Award Title, Federal Agency, Federal Award # and Year, and the name of Pass-Through Entity: This finding relates to the Airport Improvement Program - CFDA# 20.106 for the Federal Award Years 2017 and 2018 received from Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Transportation. Criteria or specific requirement: In accordance with requirements of 2 CFR section 200.305, non-Federal entities must establish written procedures over cash management, which includes criteria of how the entity will minimize the time elapsing between the transfer from the federal awarding agency and the disbursement of funds for the program costs. Condition found: In testing cash management, it was noted that the City?s written policy nor procedures over cash management address the amount of time between the transfer from the federal awarding agency and the disbursement of funds for the program costs. Although the amount of time isn?t reflected in the policy, the industry normal standards are three days between the time the transfer from the federal awarding agency was received and the payment of program costs, if the payment wasn?t paid before the monies were requested from the federal awarding agency. However, in testing ten disbursements, it was noted that, for three disbursements, the time between the transfer from the federal awarding agency and the payment of program costs was more than three days. Context: Ten expenditures tested, which represented 67% of the grant. Possible asserted effect (cause and effect): Cause: The auditor was unable to determine the cause. Effect: The City is not in compliance with federal compliance requirements related to cash management. Recommendation to prevent future occurrences: The City should establish written policies and procedures over cash management in order to eliminate uncertainty as well as establish quality control procedures to ensure the policies are being adhere to. Specifically, the City should define the number of days that they consider reasonable for payment of invoices/charges after the date of the collection of the Federal Award. Origination date and prior year reference (if applicable): This finding originated fiscal year end April 30, 2019. View of responsible official: See auditee prepared corrective action plan included later in this report as ?Corrective Action Plan for Current Year Findings and Questioned Costs.?
2019-003: Airport Improvement Program - Cash Management. The City?s policies and procedures over cash management will be updated to specify time constraints between receiving federal money and the disbursement of funds for the program costs. In addition, whenever possible, the City will make every effort to only request funds after the disbursement has been made and communicate with all federal program personnel regarding guidelines, policies and procedures
Reference # and Title: 2019-004 Airport Improvement Program ? Reporting CFDA#, Federal Award Title, Federal Agency, Federal Award # and Year, and the name of Pass-Through Entity: This finding relates to the Airport Improvement Program - CFDA# 20.106 for the Federal Award Years 2017 and 2018 received from Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Transportation. Criteria or specific requirement: Based on the grant award letter, the City is required to submit the SF-425, ?Federal Financial Report,? annually, due 90 days after the end of each federal fiscal year, which is December 31st. Condition found: The City did not submit the required annual reports for the open grants. Context: The City has two open grants under the AIP program. Possible asserted effect (cause and effect): Cause: The auditor was unable to determine the cause. Effect: The City is not in compliance with federal compliance requirements related to reporting. Recommendation to prevent future occurrences: The City should establish quality control procedures to ensure the federal reports are properly completed and submitted timely. Origination date and prior year reference (if applicable): This finding originated fiscal year end April 30, 2019. View of responsible official: See auditee prepared corrective action plan included later in this report as ?Corrective Action Plan for Current Year Findings and Questioned Costs.?
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Reference # and Title: 2019-004 Airport Improvement Program ? Reporting CFDA#, Federal Award Title, Federal Agency, Federal Award # and Year, and the name of Pass-Through Entity: This finding relates to the Airport Improvement Program - CFDA# 20.106 for the Federal Award Years 2017 and 2018 received from Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Transportation. Criteria or specific requirement: Based on the grant award letter, the City is required to submit the SF-425, ?Federal Financial Report,? annually, due 90 days after the end of each federal fiscal year, which is December 31st. Condition found: The City did not submit the required annual reports for the open grants. Context: The City has two open grants under the AIP program. Possible asserted effect (cause and effect): Cause: The auditor was unable to determine the cause. Effect: The City is not in compliance with federal compliance requirements related to reporting. Recommendation to prevent future occurrences: The City should establish quality control procedures to ensure the federal reports are properly completed and submitted timely. Origination date and prior year reference (if applicable): This finding originated fiscal year end April 30, 2019. View of responsible official: See auditee prepared corrective action plan included later in this report as ?Corrective Action Plan for Current Year Findings and Questioned Costs.?
2019-004: Airport Improvement Program - Reporting. The 2018 report has been submitted and the current report will be completed by November 30th. All future reports will be filed timely.
FAC accepted this audit on January 11, 2018 — management decision was due July 11, 2018.
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴FAC accepted this audit on January 25, 2017 — management decision was due July 25, 2017.
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
2015-010
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Monitor subrecipient audit findings and compliance status.
Start monitoring →© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.