EIN: 721396621
UEI: E77FJPLFWEL2
Data as of August 26, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on May 13, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by November 13, 2026 (78 days from today).
What is a management decision? →The FFATA report was not filed during the year as subawards were granted. Cause: The Council was unaware of the requirement to file the FFATA. Effect: Potential for unintended errors to occur without being immediately identified and corrected. The Council was not in compliance with the Uniform Guidance and the Habitat Conservation Program. Questioned Costs: None. The finding is for reporting which does not relate to questioned costs. Perspective: None of the FFATA reports were filed during 2025 for all 10 subrecipients. Recommendation: The Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) reporting requirement is a general term and condition from the Department of Commerce and should be completed as required and reviewed by someone other than the preparer before submission. Management Response: The FFATA reporting requirement was not a specific award condition on the grant award to the IRL Council from NOAA Fisheries. However, it is a standard general term and condition from the Department of Commerce which is referenced on the grant award. The subawards for the NOAA grant have now been input into SAM.gov. The IRL Council will review the specific FFATA requirements required by the Department of Commerce (different than the EPA requirements) and will make sure that the IRL Council continues to be in compliance.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴SD 2025-001 REPORTING Department of Commerce ALN 11.463 – Habitat Conservation Federal Award ID Number: FX463C0051 2025 Funding Criteria: Per 2 CFR 200.303, non-Federal entities must establish and maintain effective internal controls over Federal awards that provide reasonable assurance the entity is managing the award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. In addition, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 170, recipients of Federal awards are required to report first-tier subawards and executive compensation data in accordance with the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA). Specifically, subaward information must be reported in the Federal Subaward Reporting System (FSRS) by the end of the month following the month in which the subaward was obligated, as required by the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition: The FFATA report was not filed during the year as subawards were granted. Cause: The Council was unaware of the requirement to file the FFATA. Effect: Potential for unintended errors to occur without being immediately identified and corrected. The Council was not in compliance with the Uniform Guidance and the Habitat Conservation Program. Questioned Costs: None. The finding is for reporting which does not relate to questioned costs. Perspective: None of the FFATA reports were filed during 2025 for all 10 subrecipients. Recommendation: The Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) reporting requirement is a general term and condition from the Department of Commerce and should be completed as required and reviewed by someone other than the preparer before submission. Management Response: The FFATA reporting requirement was not a specific award condition on the grant award to the IRL Council from NOAA Fisheries. However, it is a standard general term and condition from the Department of Commerce which is referenced on the grant award. The subawards for the NOAA grant have now been input into SAM.gov. The IRL Council will review the specific FFATA requirements required by the Department of Commerce (different than the EPA requirements) and will make sure that the IRL Council continues to be in compliance.
Recommendation: The Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) reporting requirement is a general term and condition from the Department of Commerce and should be completed as required and reviewed by someone other than the preparer before submission. Management’s Response: The FFATA reporting requirement was not a specific award condition on the grant award to the IRL Council from NOAA Fisheries. However, it is a standard general term and condition from the Department of Commerce which is referenced on the grant award. The subawards for the NOAA grant have now been input into SAM.gov. The IRL Council will review the specific FFATA requirements required by the Department of Commerce (different than the EPA requirements) and will make sure that the IRL Council continues to be in compliance. Responsible Party: Daniel Kolodny, Chief Operating Officer Anticipated Completion Date: May 1, 2026
FAC accepted this audit on January 30, 2024 — management decision was due July 30, 2024.
Of the 40 students selected for enrollment reporting testing, three students within the sample were reported to NSLDS outside the maximum 60‐day window. This was not a statistically valid sample. Cause: The University did not have effective controls in place to ensure timely reporting of all status changes. Effect: Without timely notification of withdrawals or graduation, the NSLDS is unable to accurately determine when a student enters repayment status. Recommendation: We recommend that the University review and update internal controls to ensure student enrollment status in the NSLDS is updated in a timely manner to ensure compliance with Federal requirements. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding. See accompanying Corrective Action Plan.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Finding 2023‐001: Special Tests and Provisions: Enrollment Reporting Program Name: Student Financial Assistance Cluster: Federal Direct Student Loans. Assistance Listing No. 84.268 Federal Pell Grant Program, Assistance Listing No. 84.063 Awarding Agency: U.S. Department of Education Finding Type: Significant Deficiency on Internal Controls over Compliance Questioned Costs: None Criteria: Per Title 2 US Code of Federal Regulations Part 200.303a, non‐federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non‐Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). In addition, the Department of Education relies on institution’s enrollments reports to determine a student’s enrollment status based on reductions or increases in attendance levels, withdrawals, graduations or approved leaves of‐absence. According to 34 CFR 690.83(b)(2) and 685.309, the University is required to submit changes in student attendance to the National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS) at a minimum of every 60 days. Context/Condition: Of the 40 students selected for enrollment reporting testing, three students within the sample were reported to NSLDS outside the maximum 60‐day window. This was not a statistically valid sample. Cause: The University did not have effective controls in place to ensure timely reporting of all status changes. Effect: Without timely notification of withdrawals or graduation, the NSLDS is unable to accurately determine when a student enters repayment status. Recommendation: We recommend that the University review and update internal controls to ensure student enrollment status in the NSLDS is updated in a timely manner to ensure compliance with Federal requirements. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding. See accompanying Corrective Action Plan.
Finding 2023-001: Special Tests and Provisions: Enrollment Reporting Context/Condition: Of the 40 students selected for enrollment reporting testing, 3 students within the sample were reported to NSLDS outside the maximum 60-day window. Recommendation: The auditor recommended that the College review and update internal controls to ensure student enrollment status in the National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS) is updated in a timely manner to ensure compliance with Federal requirements. Persons Responsible for Corrective Action: Dr. Deokhyo Kim, Registrar Planned Corrective Action: We communicated with our software vendor, Aptron, to determine what caused the enrollment reporting issues. We identified two issues and worked with Aptron to put measures in place so that these issues do not happen in the future. 1. Missing withdrawn students who were not pulled up by system when they withdrew before or on the 1st enrollment report date. APTRON fixed the programming and the system now pulls those who are withdrawn before or on the 1st enrollment report date for each semester. 2. Missing graduates with their 2nd degree. APTRON fixed the programming, so that our Degree Verify file will now report a student who has earned a second degree with us. A Degree Verify File of graduates was submitted to the NSCH for any student who had earned a second degree not previously reported. Anticipated Completion Date: Fixes with our software vendor have been completed.
During reconciliation of the general ledger to the SEFA, it was noted multiple pay periods were duplicated which were included in request for reimbursement. Criteria: Per 2 CFR 200.303(a), the non‐federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non‐Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Per 2 CFR section 200.430(f) – Factors affecting allowability of costs ‐ Not be included as a cost or used to meet cost sharing or matching requirements of any other federally‐financed program in either the current or a prior period. Cause: The City does not have sufficient controls in place to ensure the accuracy of the amounts listed on the general ledger as charged to the grant. Questioned Cost: Known and likely questioned costs of $86,333 Effect: The City requested reimbursement for duplicate transactions resulting in disallowed costs.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴2023‐004 – Activities Allowed, Allowable Costs over Payroll (Material Noncompliance, Material Weakness over Internal Controls over Compliance) Federal Program Information Federal Award Title and ALN: Airport Improvement Program, 20.106 Federal Awarding Agency: Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration Federal Award ID Number: SAF‐SWG‐3‐35‐0037‐057‐2021 Federal Award Year: 2023 Condition: During reconciliation of the general ledger to the SEFA, it was noted multiple pay periods were duplicated which were included in request for reimbursement. Criteria: Per 2 CFR 200.303(a), the non‐federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non‐Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Per 2 CFR section 200.430(f) – Factors affecting allowability of costs ‐ Not be included as a cost or used to meet cost sharing or matching requirements of any other federally‐financed program in either the current or a prior period. Cause: The City does not have sufficient controls in place to ensure the accuracy of the amounts listed on the general ledger as charged to the grant. Questioned Cost: Known and likely questioned costs of $86,333 Effect: The City requested reimbursement for duplicate transactions resulting in disallowed costs.
Recommendation: The auditor recommends the City strengthen policies and procedures to ensure a review of the general ledger for the federal program to ensure no duplicate costs are charged prior to reimbursement. Additionally, the Finance Department should provide secondary review on all requests for reimbursements. Action Taken: The City agrees with this finding. When this issue was brought to the attention of the Finance Director and Accounting Officer as material noncompliance, the schedule of expenditures of federal awards (SEFA) was revised to remove the duplicated expenditures. Management proposed an adjusting journal entry prior to the completion of the audit to record the amount of the reimbursement for duplicated expenditures as a liability “due to Federal Government”. The City will work with the awarding agencies to return the funds that were reimbursed incorrectly. When this reimbursement request was done the payroll expenditure data that was used to calculate the reimbursement request was compiled manually by combining multiple reports. This was a manual process. The process has changed, so that now the Airport Administrative Manager gets one report directly from the Payroll Division that contains all Airport payroll expenditure data. In November 2022 (about 5 months into FY23) the City hired a new Airport Manager with substantial experience managing municipal airports and overseeing federal funding for airports. In CY24 the Finance Director and the Accounting Officer will work with the Airport staff to strengthen policies and procedures to ensure a review of the general ledger for the federal program to ensure no duplicate costs are charged prior to reimbursement. Secondary review by the Finance Department or a vendor approved by the Finance Director will be required for all Airport requests for reimbursements. The City is in the process of identifying a vendor to contract with Airport to assist with federal compliance and provide training to Airport staff on relevant Uniform Guidance requirements. The vendor’s scope of work will include performing secondary review of requests for reimbursement and helping with developing and documenting policies and standard operang procedures for requests for reimbursement. In CY24 the City will provide Uniform Guidance training to staff which will include internal controls related to activities allowed and allowable costs over payroll. Due Date of Completion: December 31, 2024 Responsible Official: Emily Oster - Finance Director, James Harries - Airport Manager, Matthew Bonifer - Accounting Officer, Grants Manager (in recruitment).
During our review of payroll related transactions, 10 out of 45 timesheets tested did not include appropriate approval by the Manager/Supervisor. Criteria: Per Title 2 US Code of Federal Regulations Part 200.303a, non‐federal entities must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non‐Federal entities is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Per Title 2 US Code of Federal Regulations Part 200.403g, costs must be adequately documented to be allowable under Federal awards. Cause: The City is not following procedures to ensure the appropriate approvals are being conducted on all payroll transactions. Questioned Cost: None. Effect: The City may unintentionally overpay or underpay employees during their fiscal year.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴2023‐005 – Activities Allowed, Allowable Costs over Payroll (Material Weakness over Internal Controls over Compliance) Federal Program Information Federal Award Title and ALN: Airport Improvement Program, 20.106 Federal Awarding Agency: Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration Federal Award ID Number: SAF‐SWG‐3‐35‐0037‐057‐2021 Federal Award Year: 2023 Condition: During our review of payroll related transactions, 10 out of 45 timesheets tested did not include appropriate approval by the Manager/Supervisor. Criteria: Per Title 2 US Code of Federal Regulations Part 200.303a, non‐federal entities must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non‐Federal entities is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Per Title 2 US Code of Federal Regulations Part 200.403g, costs must be adequately documented to be allowable under Federal awards. Cause: The City is not following procedures to ensure the appropriate approvals are being conducted on all payroll transactions. Questioned Cost: None. Effect: The City may unintentionally overpay or underpay employees during their fiscal year.
Recommendation: The auditor recommends the City strengthen the controls in place to provide assurance that proper review occurs on all transactions. The City’s review/oversight should be designed to ensure that items missing approvals do not move forward in the payroll process. Action Taken: The City agrees with this finding. In FY22 the Payroll Division started sending out a bi‐weekly payroll reminder with tips and guidance for managers and supervisors. In FY24 the Finance Director and the Payroll Officer began working with the City Manager’s Office to strengthen enforcement of policies and procedures to ensure that appropriate approvals are conducted on all payroll transactions. City Leadership, Department Directors, and Senior Staff have been directed frequently at weekly Senior Staff meetings to ensure that proper review and approval occurs on all employee timesheets. The Payroll Officer continues to send reminder emails every pay period with instructions about how to review and approve timesheets in the Munis system, and the Payroll Division provides training as requested by Department staff. During CY24 the City plans to implement an upgrade of the UKG Kronos timekeeping system. The new UKG Dimensions system will offer additional functionality and the ability to interface directly with the Munis ERP system. Additionally, the Payroll Division will develop training on timecard approval and add this information to the bi‐weekly correspondence about timesheet approval deadlines. The Finance Director and Payroll Officer will also work with the City Manager and HR to address repeat noncompliance with disciplinary action. Further, we will work with HR and IT to ensure that all timecards have a backup approver in the event of a supervisor’s absence. The Finance Director and the Payroll Officer will work with the City Manager’s Office to develop a process whereby items missing required approvals are resolved prior to payroll running. The City is in the process of identifying a vendor to contract with Airport to assist with federal compliance and provide training to Airport staff on relevant Uniform Guidance requirements. The vendor’s scope of work will include helping with developing and documenting policies and standard operang procedures, including procedures for Airport payroll approvals. In CY24 the City will provide Uniform Guidance training to staff which will include internal controls related to activities allowed and allowable costs over payroll. Due Date of Completion: December 31, 2024 Responsible Official: Emily Oster - Finance Director, James Harries - Airport Manager, Melanie Sharpe - Payroll Officer, Grants Manager (in recruitment), Bernadette Salazar - Human Resources, Eric Candelaria - Information Technology & Telecommunications, and all Airport Supervisors and Managers
The City’s approved annual inventory was not complete and accurate. Certain assets listed as disposed were still in use for Airport operations, other assets that were disposed were included as active assets. Criteria: Per 2 CFR 200.303(a), the non‐federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non‐Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Per 2 CFR 200.313(d)(1) Property records must be maintained that include a description of the property, a serial number or other identification number, the source of funding for the property (including the FAIN), who holds title, the acquisition date, and cost of the property, percentage of Federal participation in the project costs for the Federal award under which the property was acquired, the location, use and condition of the property, and any ultimate disposition data including the date of disposal and sale price of the property. Cause: The City’s approved annual inventory contained errors in information and assets disposed of still listed. Questioned Cost: None. Effect: The City could dispose of or lose federally funded equipment without following federal guidelines.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴2023‐006 – Equipment and Real Property Management (Material Weakness over Internal Controls over Compliance) Federal Program Information Federal Award Title and ALN: Airport Improvement Program, 20.106 Federal Awarding Agency: Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration Federal Award ID Number: SAF‐SWG‐3‐35‐0037‐051‐2020 Federal Award Year: 2023 Condition: The City’s approved annual inventory was not complete and accurate. Certain assets listed as disposed were still in use for Airport operations, other assets that were disposed were included as active assets. Criteria: Per 2 CFR 200.303(a), the non‐federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non‐Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Per 2 CFR 200.313(d)(1) Property records must be maintained that include a description of the property, a serial number or other identification number, the source of funding for the property (including the FAIN), who holds title, the acquisition date, and cost of the property, percentage of Federal participation in the project costs for the Federal award under which the property was acquired, the location, use and condition of the property, and any ultimate disposition data including the date of disposal and sale price of the property. Cause: The City’s approved annual inventory contained errors in information and assets disposed of still listed. Questioned Cost: None. Effect: The City could dispose of or lose federally funded equipment without following federal guidelines.
Recommendation: The auditor recommends the City enhance the design of its control activities and create a tool to assist in tracking and maintaining equipment purchased with federal funds. Additionally, the employees responsible for the inventory count should be trained to ensure understanding of the Uniform Guidance requirements relevant to equipment and real property management. Periodic review should also be designed to evaluate compliance with the relevant requirements. Action Taken: The City agrees with this finding. In November 2022 (about 5 months into FY23) the City hired a new Airport Manager with substantial experience managing municipal airports and overseeing federal funding for airports. During FY23 the long‐time Administrative Manager at the Airport separated without notice from the City and other staff were unable to access needed files which included equipment records. In FY24 the Airport Manager hired a heavy equipment mechanic. This position is responsible for tracking, maintaining, and repairing Airport equipment. Logbooks are now being kept for all equipment. In CY24 the Finance Director and the Accounting Officer will work with the Airport staff to improve internal controls over equipment purchased with federal funds. Policies and procedures will be developed to ensure that an accurate physical inventory is conducted timely, and that assets are removed from the asset listing when they are disposed of. Tools will be developed to facilitate tracking and maintaining equipment purchased with federal funds. In CY24 the City will provide Uniform Guidance training to staff which will include capital assets and equipment information. The City is in the process of identifying a vendor to contract with Airport to assist with federal compliance and provide training to Airport staff on relevant Uniform Guidance requirements. The vendor’s scope of work will also include helping with developing and documenting standard operang procedures related to equipment and real property management. Due Date of Completion: December 31, 2024 Responsible Official: Emily Oster - Finance Director, James Harries - Airport Manager, Jerome Sanchez - Airport Heavy Equipment Mechanic, Matthew Bonifer - Accounting Officer, Grants Manager (in recruitment)
During review of reports, the City submitted 10 financial reports that did not include supporting backup documentation to substantiate the information reported. Management’s Progress on Repeat Findings: Some progress made from prior year. Criteria: Per Title 2 US Code of Federal Regulations Part 200.303a, non‐federal entities must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non‐Federal entities is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Per Title 2 US Code of Federal Regulations Part 200.508(d), the Auditee must provide the auditor with access to books, records, supporting documentation, and other information as needed for the auditor to perform the audit required by grant agreements and part 200.306(b), for all federal awards, any matching funds, must be accepted as part of the non‐Federal entities matching when the following criteria is met (1) Are verifiable from the non‐Federal entities records. Cause: The City does not have sufficient controls in place to ensure documentation is retained to support accuracy of the report. Questioned Cost: None Effect: Lack of proper support for accuracy of reports can result in improper reporting which could lead to disallowed costs. However, our audit disclosed no instances of unallowable costs.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴2023‐007 (2021‐009) – Financial Reporting (Material Weakness in Internal Controls over Compliance) (repeated/modified) Federal Program Information Federal Award Title and ALN: Airport Improvement Program, 20.106 Federal Awarding Agency: Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration Federal Award ID Number: SAF‐SWG‐3‐35‐0037‐051‐2020; SAF‐SWG‐3‐35‐0037‐052‐2020; SAF‐SWG‐3‐35‐0037‐054‐2021; SAF‐SWG‐3‐35‐0037‐057‐2021 Federal Award Year: 2023 Condition: During review of reports, the City submitted 10 financial reports that did not include supporting backup documentation to substantiate the information reported. Management’s Progress on Repeat Findings: Some progress made from prior year. Criteria: Per Title 2 US Code of Federal Regulations Part 200.303a, non‐federal entities must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non‐Federal entities is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Per Title 2 US Code of Federal Regulations Part 200.508(d), the Auditee must provide the auditor with access to books, records, supporting documentation, and other information as needed for the auditor to perform the audit required by grant agreements and part 200.306(b), for all federal awards, any matching funds, must be accepted as part of the non‐Federal entities matching when the following criteria is met (1) Are verifiable from the non‐Federal entities records. Cause: The City does not have sufficient controls in place to ensure documentation is retained to support accuracy of the report. Questioned Cost: None Effect: Lack of proper support for accuracy of reports can result in improper reporting which could lead to disallowed costs. However, our audit disclosed no instances of unallowable costs.
Recommendation: The auditor recommends the City strengthen the controls in place to provide assurance backup documentation is retained with reports to support amounts reported. The employees responsible for report preparation should be trained to ensure understanding of the relevant Uniform Guidance requirements. Additionally, review procedures should be designed to address proper document retention to substantiate information reported. Action Taken: The City agrees with this finding. In November 2022 (about 5 months into FY23) the City hired a new Airport Manager with substantial experience managing municipal airports and overseeing federal funding for airports. Prior to the hire, the Airport Operations Manager was the acting airport manager, but that position was vacated during FY23. There was a period during FY23 between when the Airport Operations Manager left the City and when the new Airport Manager came on board. In CY24 the Finance Director and the Accounting Officer will work with the Airport staff to implement controls and to provide assurance that Federal Financial Reports have adequate supporting documentation and are reviewed and approved prior to submission the grantor agency timely. The City is in the process of identifying a vendor to contract with Airport to assist with federal compliance and provide training to Airport staff on relevant Uniform Guidance requirements. The vendor’s scope of work will also include helping with developing and documenting standard operating procedures related to documentation requirements and document retention. Due Date of Completion: December 31, 2024 Responsible Official: Emily Oster - Finance Director, James Harries - Airport Manager, Matthew Bonifer - Accounting Officer, Grants Manager (in recruitment)
2022-009
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Monitor subrecipient audit findings and compliance status.
Start monitoring →© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.