Federal Organization: U.S Department of Health and Human Services Assistance Listing Numbers: 93.224 & 93.527 Health Center Program Cluster Award Numbers: H80CS26583, H8FCS41666 Criteria : Compliance Finding Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, Subpart F, Compliance Supplement, Part 4, Compliance Requirement N, Special Tests and Provisions states, “Health Centers must prepare and apply a sliding fee discount schedule so that the amounts owed for health center services by eligible patients are adjusted (discounted) based on the patients ability to pay.” Condition: During our testing of sliding fee discounts for health center patients qualifying for reduced charge visits, we identified one incident where the slide fee was applied to a patient account without a completed application on file and three incidents in which the incorrect sliding fee was applied. Context: This finding appears to be a systemic incident. A sample size of 25 patients included one without an application on file and three which did not have the correct sliding fee applied. Cause:The Organization did not follow its policies and procedures set in place to ensure the sliding fee schedule discount is correctly determined and applied to patient accounts. Effect: Patients may have been granted the incorrect sliding fee discount Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified Recommendation: We recommend continued effort in training personnel to be properly trained on applying the appropriate sliding fee discount based on the Organization’s approved policy and in compliance with the OMB Compliance Supplement requirements. An appropriate level of review should be conducted on patient accounts to ensure proper document retention, application of sliding fee discounts, and third-party insurance billing. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: CrescentCare agrees with the finding and has put staff and procedures in place to prevent these incidents from occurring.
The Clinical Practice Director has put procedures in place to verify the accuracy of documentation and application of the correct slide. The procedures consist of a monthly review of the paperwork and sliding fee for completeness and accuracy and continued training of personnel.
2022-002
2022-001 Reporting Program Information Federal Organization U.S Department of Health and Human Services Assistance Listing Numbers 93.224 & 93.527 Health Center Program Cluster Award Numbers H80CS26583, H8FCS41666 Criteria [X] Compliance Finding [ ] Significant Deficiency [ ] Material Weakness Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, Subpart F, Compliance Supplement, Part 4, Compliance Requirement L, Reporting, requires the reporting of cash draws, among other things, to be included in the Uniform Data Systems (UDS) reports filed with awarding agencies. Our testing of the December 31, 2021, UDS report noted a difference in the amount of actual cash draws and the amount reported for the covered period. Condition Amounts reported as draw downs in the calendar year end UDS report were significantly different from actual cash received and drawn down. Context This finding appears to be isolated. Cause The Organization?s internal controls over compliance were not adequate to prevent or detect errors in amounts reported in the UDS report. Effect The amounts reported on the Organization?s UDS report did not properly report cash receipts through PMS draws. Questioned Costs None identified Recommendation We recommend the Organization implement procedures to ensure reports filed with awarding agencies accurately reflect the appropriate activity for the period covered by the report. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective action CrescentCare agrees with the finding and will add an additional layer of review of reports prior to submission. Management has made every effort to fully staff the finance department to provide a proper level of review to ensure reports accurately reflect the appropriate activity covered by the report filed with awarding agencies.
2022-001 Reporting Corrective action planned: Management hired a CFO who will provide an additional review to ensure and confirm that grant reports reconcile to the general ledger prior to the grant report being submitted. Anticipated completion date: November 30, 2022 Contact person responsible for corrective action: Annette LeBlanc, CFO
2022-002 Application of Sliding Fee Discount Program Information Federal Organization U.S Department of Health and Human Services Assistance Listing Numbers 93.224 & 93.527 Health Center Program Cluster Award Numbers H80CS26583, H8FCS41666 Criteria [X] Compliance Finding [ ] Significant Deficiency [ ] Material Weakness Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, Subpart F, Compliance Supplement, Part 4, Compliance Requirement N, Special Tests and Provisions states, ?Health Centers must prepare and apply a sliding fee discount schedule so that the amounts owed for health center services by eligible patients are adjusted (discounted) based on the patients ability to pay.? Condition During our testing of sliding fee discounts for health center patients qualifying for reduced charge visits, we identified two incidents in which the incorrect sliding fee was applied. Context This finding appears to be an isolated incident. A sample size of 25 patients included two which did not have the correct sliding fee applied. Cause The Organization did not follow its policies and procedures set in place to ensure the sliding fee schedule discount is correctly determined and applied to patient accounts. Effect Patients may have been granted the incorrect sliding fee discount. Questioned Costs None identified Recommendation We recommend continued effort in training personnel to be properly trained on applying the appropriate sliding fee discount based on the Organization?s approved policy and in compliance with the OMB Compliance Supplement requirements. An appropriate level of review should be conducted on patient accounts to ensure proper document retention, application of sliding fee discounts, and third-party insurance billing. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective action CrescentCare agrees with the finding and will train and retrain staff on correct implementation of the sliding fee scale. Management supports continued training of staff on applying the appropriate sliding fee discount.
2022-002 Application of Sliding Fee Discount Corrective action planned: Management conducts quarterly internal audits of sliding fee discounts for health center patients. Based on the audit finding and the results of the internal audit, additional training and retraining will be provided to the personnel to support the correct application of the sliding fee discount program. Anticipated completion date: Ongoing Contact person responsible for corrective action: Roxanne Hadnott-Songy, Director of Compliance
Federal agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Federal program title: Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS (HOPWA) CFDA Number: 14.241 Pass-Through Agency: City of New Orleans Division of Housing and Neighborhood Development and UNITY of Greater New Orleans Type of Finding: ? Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance ? Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Except for persons in short-term supportive housing, each person receiving rental assistance under the HOPWA program must pay as rent the higher of: (1) 30 percent of the family?s monthly adjusted gross income; (2) 10 percent of the family?s monthly gross income; or (3) the portion of the payments that is designated if the family is receiving payments for welfare assistance from a public agency and a part of the payments, adjusted in accordance with the family?s actual housing costs, is specifically designated by the agency to meet the family?s housing costs (24 CFR section 574.310). Condition: During our testing, we noted instances where the amount of rent paid under the HOPWA program was not calculated properly. Context: Four out of sixty benefit payments tested were improperly calculated. The total monthly amount paid for these 4 individuals rent payments was $3,115 but should have been $3,253. Cause: The spreadsheet used to calculate amounts to be paid was modified improperly. Effect: In three cases, CrescentCare paid more than was calculated, and in one case paid less than what was calculated, resulting in program participants paying either less than required or more than required. Recommendation: We recommend CrescentCare implement controls around the spreadsheet used to calculate amounts to be paid with locked cells and a review process. Views of responsible officials: We have already locked the spreadsheet so that the calculation cells cannot be modified. Additionally, we have implemented additional reviews and internal audits of the program to ensure that the rents are calculated correctly.
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development 2020-002 Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS (HOPWA) ? CFDA No. 14.241 Recommendation: We recommend CrescentCare implement controls around the spreadsheet used to calculate amounts to be paid with locked cells and a review process. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: We have already locked the spreadsheet so that the calculation cells cannot be modified. Additionally, we have implemented additional reviews and internal audits of the program to ensure that the rents are calculated correctly. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Andre Duhe Planned completion date for corrective action plan: December 31, 2020.
Federal agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Federal program title: Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS (HOPWA) CFDA Number: 14.241 Pass-Through Agency: City of New Orleans Division of Housing and Neighborhood Development Type of Finding: ? Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance ? Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: A person eligible for assistance under this program means a person with HIV or AIDS who is a low-income individual and the person?s family, including persons important to their care or well-being, as defined in 24 CFR section 574.3. The eligibility of those tenants who were admitted to the program should be determined by (1) obtaining applications that contain all the information needed to determine eligibility, including diagnosis, documentation of housing need, income, rent, and order of selection; and (2) obtaining third-party verifications or documentation of expected income, assets, unusual medical expenses, and any other pertinent information. Condition: One program participant was miscoded to HOPWA instead of the program they were noted to be eligible for, which was CFDA 14.267, Continuum of Care. Context: One out of 60 tenants tested was improperly coded to HOPWA instead of Continuum of Care, with a monthly rent payment of $623. It was noted that no other months were coded to HOPWA for this participant in our testing. Questioned Costs: $623 Cause: There was a coding error for the tenant. Effect: Tenant was coded to program for which eligibility requirements were not met. Recommendation: We recommend CrescentCare implement controls around participants entering program to ensure proper program utilized. Views of responsible officials: We have implemented additional workflows and internal reviews to ensure that individuals are coded and billed to the correct program. The check in question did not actually clear the bank prior to submitting the final invoice, therefore we did not actually receive reimbursement from the HOPWA funds for this questioned cost.
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development 2020-003 Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS (HOPWA) ? CFDA No. 14.241 Recommendation: We recommend CrescentCare implement controls around participants entering program to ensure proper program utilized. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: We have implemented additional workflows and internal reviews to ensure that individuals are coded and billed to the correct program. We have hired one additional staff member and are in the process of expanding the role of another staff member to assist with the oversite of this program. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Andre Duhe Planned completion date for corrective action plan: January 31, 2021.
Federal agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal program titles: Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS (HOPWA) and Ryan White Part D CFDA Numbers: 14.241 and 93.153 Pass-Through Agencies: City of New Orleans Division of Housing and Neighborhood Development for HOPWA Type of Finding: ? Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance ? Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, ?200.430 specifies that charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. Condition: CrescentCare employees prepare time and effort certifications twice a year which indicate their time spent on federal programs. For two employees tested for HOPWA, and two employees tested for Ryan White Part D, the time and effort certification indicated less time was spent on the federal grant than was billed. Context: Two out of thirteen employees tested for HOPWA had less time certified than was charged, and less than 5% differences were noted. Two out of eight employees tested for Ryan White Part D had less time certified than was charged, less than 10% differences were noted. Cause: There were delays on time and effort reconciliations. Effect: Program could be over or under billed if time and effort is not calculated correctly from employee certifications. Repeat Finding: Yes, for HOPWA Recommendation: We recommend CrescentCare implement a reconciliation process to ensure that differences in employee reporting and costs reported to grantor are accurate and timely. Views of responsible officials: We have implemented additional workflows and internal reviews over billing to ensure that the correct percentages of staff salaries are coded and billed to the correct grant program. In addition, we are in the process of hiring additional staff to ensure we have additional review and oversight over invoicing and the time and effort process.
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 2020-004 Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS (HOPWA) ? CFDA No. 14.241 and Ryan White Part D ? CFDA No. 93.153 Recommendation: We recommend CrescentCare implement a reconciliation process to ensure that differences in employee reporting and costs reported to grantor are accurate and timely. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: We have implemented additional workflows and internal reviews over billing to ensure that the correct percentages of staff salaries are coded and billed to the correct grant program. In addition, we are in the process of hiring additional staff to ensure we have additional review and oversight over invoicing and the time and effort process. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Andre Duhe Planned completion date for corrective action plan: February 28, 2021.
2019-003
Federal agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal program titles: HIV Prevention Activities CFDA Numbers: 93.940 Pass-Through Agency: Louisiana Department of Health (State Prevention Grant) Type of Finding: ? Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance ? Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: A non-Federal entity may charge to the Federal award only allowable costs incurred during the period of performance and any costs incurred before the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity made the Federal award that were authorized by the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity (2 CFR section 200.309). Condition: The period of performance for the State Prevention grant began on July 1, 2019. There were $1,270 of services for June 2019 that were billed on the July 2019 invoice. Context: The entire invoice was reviewed for period of performance, over $11,000 of costs were billed, with $1,270 relating to June 2019. Cause: The state generates the report used for invoicing and had not removed the services outside of the period of performance. This was not caught in the review of the reimbursement request by CrescentCare management. Effect: Costs were charged outside the grant period and will need to be repaid to the grantor. Recommendation: We recommend CrescentCare implement review of services provided for proper cutoff, even when the grantor is generating the report used for the invoice. Views of responsible officials: We have submitted the reimbursement to the funder for the amount billed and paid out of the previous grant year. In addition, we have been in contact with our funder and have trained our staff to review the reports and ensure we avoid this issue at the end of next grant year.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 2020-005 HIV Prevention Activities ? CFDA No. 93.940 Recommendation: We recommend CrescentCare implement review of services provided for proper cutoff, even when the grantor is generating the report used for the invoice. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: We have submitted the reimbursement to the funder for the amount billed and paid out of the previous grant year. In addition, we have been in contact with our funder and have trained our staff to review the reports and ensure we avoid this issue at the end of the next grant year. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Andre Duhe Planned completion date for corrective action plan: December 31, 2020.
Federal agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal program titles: Ryan White Part C CFDA Numbers: 93.918 Type of Finding: ? Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance ? Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Ryan White Part C requires that an annual SF-425 be filed detailing out costs charged to the grant in specific categories. 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, ?200.303 specifies that a non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition: Indirect expenses reported on the annual SF-425 report were calculated at the provisional rate, which is not used on this grant. There is a different rate used in the grant award. Indirect expenses reported on the SF-425 were overstated. Additionally, there was not a documented review process over the report. Context: The indirect cost section was the only section that was not reported properly. Other sections of the SF-425 were reported properly. Cause: There was confusion on how to report indirect costs on the SF-425. Effect: Improper reporting to the federal agency on expenses under the grant. Recommendation: We recommend CrescentCare update the report and change the process going forward, along with implementing a documented review process over the report. Views of responsible officials: Funder approved SF-425 with indirect costs reported this way and it?s not what was actually billed to the grant. We have retrained staff on how to properly complete this report moving forward. To be clear, we drew down the proper amount for the grant, it was only on the reporting that there was an error.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 2020-006 Ryan White Part C ? CFDA No. 93.918 Recommendation: We recommend CrescentCare update the report and change the process going forward, along with implementing a documented review process over the report. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: We have retrained staff on how to properly complete this report moving forward. We have implemented additional reviews process for reports prior to submission. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Andre Duhe Planned completion date for corrective action plan: December 31, 2020
Federal agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal program titles: Ryan White Part D, Health Center Program, Ryan White Part C CFDA Numbers: 93.153, 93.224, 93.918 Type of Finding: ? Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, ?200.303 specifies that a non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition: Documentation of internal controls to support amounts requested from the federal government during the first part of the year was not maintained. Context: Four out of five cash requests for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2020 did not contain evidence of internal controls in place for each grant. Cause: Controls were implemented late in the year as a result of a previous audit finding, however the first part of the year did not have such documentation. Effect: Amounts requested during the year did not have proper support to document internal controls in place. Repeat Finding: Yes, for Ryan White Part D Recommendation: CrescentCare has implemented a new process for fiscal year 2021 which addresses the finding. We viewed documentation of this in the last cash request for fiscal year 2020 in July 2020. We recommend management continue with the process it has developed to document controls for each draw. Views of responsible officials: We agree. As stated above, we implemented a new process that fully addresses this issue after the conclusion of prior year audit and this process has remained in place for each subsequent cash request.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 2020-007 Ryan White Part D ? CFDA No. 93.153; Health Center Program ? CFDA 93.224; Ryan White Part C ? CFDA 93.918 Recommendation: CrescentCare has implemented a new process for fiscal year 2021 which addresses the finding. We viewed documentation of this in the last cash request for fiscal year 2020 in July 2020. We recommend management continue with the process it has developed to document controls for each draw. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: We implemented a new process that fully addresses this issue after the conclusion of prior year audit and this process has remained in place for each subsequent cash request. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Andre Duhe Planned completion date for corrective action plan: June 30, 2020.
2019-004
Federal agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal program title: Health Center Program CFDA Number: 93.224 Type of Finding: ? Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance ? Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Health centers must prepare and apply a sliding fee discount schedule so that the amounts owed for health center services by eligible patients are adjusted (discounted) based on the patient?s ability to pay based on Federal Poverty Guidelines. Condition: During our testing surrounding the sliding fee discount policy, we noted two sliding fee adjustments were calculated incorrectly. In both scenarios, the system included incorrect information compared to the sliding fee application and other support on file. Context: Out of 40 patients tested, we noted errors on these two patients. The system included two dependents for the first patient when the sliding fee application only listed one dependent. The sliding fee application for the second patient included two different financial amounts which would have conflicting sliding fee adjustments. This difference was not investigated prior to being input in the system. Cause: Manual error in data entry. Effect: The patient paid an incorrect amount for their sliding fee. Recommendation: We recommend the organization have a review process over the data entry to ensure accuracy and provide training as needed to mitigate risk of future errors. Views of responsible officials We have recently hired a new Practice Registration Manager and she is in the process of revising the sliding fee schedule SOP and updating the training process for staff. The revised SOP includes another layer of review prior to applying the sliding fee schedule in our electronic health record as well as auditing for the correct application.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 2020-008 Health Center Program ? CFDA 93.224 Recommendation: We recommend the organization have a review process over the data entry to ensure accuracy and provide training as needed to mitigate risk of future errors. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: We have recently hired a new Practice Registration Manager and she is in the process of revising the sliding fee schedule SOP and updating the training process for staff. The revised SOP includes another layer of review prior to applying the sliding fee schedule in our health record as well as auditing for the correct application. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Andre Duhe Planned completion date for corrective action plan: March 30, 2021.
Federal agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Federal program title: Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS CFDA Number: 14.241 Pass-Through Agency: City of New Orleans Division of Housing and Neighborhood Development Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance, Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, ?200.430(i) Compensation?personal services requires that charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. Condition: During our testing, we noted CrescentCare charged compensation for personal services to the grant based on budgeted amounts. Budgeted amounts charged to the grant were not updated for actual time spent and time and effort reports were not completed. Questioned costs: $9,875 Context: For this specific grant, employees did not maintain time and effort reporting. For the six employees tested, amounts charged to the grant were derived from the budget cost control statement. Cause: With the turnover at the Organization the internal controls over tracking information for this grant deteriorated. Effect: If amounts are not reconciled to actual time and effort reporting, over or under charging of the grant could occur. Recommendation: We recommend CrescentCare implement time and effort reporting that is consistent throughout the organization on all federal grants and reconciled on a regular basis to actual amounts. Views of responsible officials: Management will develop a more robust process around time and effort reporting to include all employees who perform work on federal grants. Management would note however that the documentation of time and effort may not always result in the ability to bill the funder accordingly. Additionally, management will implement a process to provide timely documentation of time and effort reporting for the HOPWA funding.
Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS ? CFDA No. 14.241 Recommendation: We recommend CrescentCare implement time and effort reporting that is consistent throughout the organization on all federal grants and reconciled on a regular basis to actual amounts. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: Management will develop a more robust process around time and effort reporting to include all employees who perform work on federal grants. Management would note however that the documentation of time and effort may not always result in the ability to bill the funder accordingly. Additionally, management will implement a process to provide timely documentation of time and effort reporting for the HOPWA funding. Name of the contact person responsible for corrective action: Andre Duhe at (504) 821-2601. Planned completion date for corrective action plan: May 31, 2020
Federal agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal program title: Coordinated Services and Access to Research for Women, Infants, Children, and Youth CFDA Number: 93.153 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, ?200.305 Payment specifies that payment methods must minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the United States Treasury or the pass-through entity and the disbursement by the non-Federal entity. 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, ?200.303 specifies that a non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition: Documentation of internal controls to support amounts requested from the federal government during the year was not maintained. Specific requests could not be tied to general ledger detail or a detail of specific expenses. Additionally, there was difficulty reconciling the total amount of grant expenses to a detail listing. Context: There were five payment requests submitted during the year for the grant, which did not have evidence of an internal control. Cause: There was not a specific invoice required to submit for each payment request, so this documentation was not created. Effect: Amounts requested during the year did not have proper support to document internal controls in place over cash management. Recommendation: We recommend CrescentCare implement a system to document clearly which expenses are requested for reimbursement in each payment request, and ensure proper internal controls are in place for cash management. This process will also aid in the year-end reconciliation of expenses incurred. Views of responsible officials: In the 2019-2020 fiscal year, CrescentCare created and implemented an invoice process to detail out expenses for drawdowns for all federal grants to ensure efficient reconciliation of grant expenses. Management notes that the use of an invoice records activities for a moment in time. There may be subsequent changes and adjustments in the following quarter?s drawdown due to the timing of when invoices are received.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Coordinated Services and Access to Research for Women, Infants, Children, and Youth ? CFDA No. 93.153 Recommendation: We recommend CrescentCare implement a system to document clearly which expenses are requested for reimbursement in each payment request, and ensure proper internal controls are in place for cash management. This process will also aid in the year-end reconciliation of expenses incurred. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: In the 2019-2020 fiscal year, CrescentCare created and implemented an invoice process to detail out expenses for drawdowns for all federal grants to ensure efficient reconciliation of grant expenses. Management notes that the use of an invoice records activities for a moment in time. There may be subsequent changes and adjustments in the following quarter?s drawdown due to the timing of when invoices are received. Name of the contact person responsible for corrective action: Andre Duhe at (504) 821-2601. Planned completion date for corrective action plan: March 31, 2020
Federal agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Federal program titles: Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS and Continuum of Care CFDA Numbers: 14.241 and 14.267 Pass-Through Agencies: City of New Orleans Division of Housing and Neighborhood Development, Unity of Greater New Orleans Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria or specific requirement: For CFDA 14.267: 24 CFR section 578.49(b)(1) and 578.49(b)(2) and 578.51(g). For CFDA 14.241: 24 CFR section 574.320. These standards require that rents paid must be reasonable in relation to rents being charged in the area for comparable space. CrescentCare prepares a rent reasonableness checklist and certification form which documents the rent reasonableness of the unit. The form is signed and dated by the person who completed the calculation. For some of the checklists reviewed, we noted that there was no evidence of the date the reasonableness testing was completed. It was unclear if the form was completed prior to rent payments beginning as there was no date. We noted in all forms that rent was determined to be reasonable. Context: For CFDA 14.241, 14 of the 40 checklists we tested did not contain evidence of the date the form was completed. For CFDA 14.267, 15 of the 19 checklists we tested did not contain evidence of the date the form was completed. Cause: The person who prepared the form missed the date field when completing. Effect: If the form is not prepared prior to rent payments beginning, excessive rent could be paid. Recommendation: We recommend CrescentCare train its employees on the forms to ensure that the date field is completed, and that forms are in tenant files prior to rent payments beginning. Views of responsible officials: Management will develop a process to ensure that all rent reasonableness forms are dated, signed and retained in the file when completed. Management notes that these forms are completed and filed electronically which the date of completion could be verified by the date the form was uploaded to the system.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS and Continuum of Care ? CFDA Nos. 14.241 and 14.267 Recommendation: We recommend CrescentCare train its employees on the forms to ensure that the date field is completed, and that forms are in tenant files prior to rent payments beginning. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: Management will develop a process to ensure that all rent reasonableness forms are dated, signed and retained in the file when completed. Management notes that these forms are completed and filed electronically which the date of completion could be verified by the date the form was uploaded to the system. Name of the contact person responsible for corrective action: Andre Duhe at (504) 821-2601. Planned completion date for corrective action plan: March 31, 2020
Federal agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal program titles: HIV Emergency Relief Project Grants CFDA Numbers: 93.914 Pass-Through Agencies: City of New Orleans Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria or specific requirement: Grant recipients are required to track and account for all program income in accordance with 45 CFR 75.302(b)(3). Recipients must report program income on their Federal Financial Report (FFR). HRSA Policy Clarification Notice 15-03 provides guidance on program income, and HRSA issued frequently asked questions on program income as well. It indicates that 340B generated revenue is considered program income for this grant. When an entity is 340B eligible and purchases pharmaceuticals via 340B pricing under multiple awards, the recipient must use a reasonable allocation method for the attribution of costs and program income, and be able to document the methodology used. Condition: Amounts reported for program income on the FFR were determined by a CrescentCare employee based on the number of visits under this grant versus overall visits. Documentation of this calculation and support was not maintained. Subsequently, it was determined that program income waslikely lower based on visit data. Program income was properly used. Context: The amount of program income reported was approximately $386,000; the amount of program income calculated subsequently was approximately $181,000. Cause: Documentation of program income amounts reported could not be located. The employee who prepared the amounts reported left the organization. Effect: Program income could be over or under reported. Recommendation: We recommend CrescentCare maintain documentation of all calculations used for reporting to ensure that program income is properly calculated and reported. Views of responsible officials: Management will develop a process to document the program income calculation. Management notes that the program income calculation is reflective of the revenue and expenses at a moment in time prior to any adjustments. These adjustments may result in a change to the recorded program income for a prior period and require a reconciliation between the initial record and what is now being reported.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES HIV Emergency Relief Project Grants ? CFDA No. 93.914 Recommendation: We recommend CrescentCare maintain documentation of all calculations used for reporting to ensure that program income is properly calculated and reported. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: Management will develop a process to document the program income calculation. Management notes that the program income calculation is reflective of the revenue and expenses at a moment in time prior to any adjustments. These adjustments may result in a change to the recorded program income for a prior period and require a reconciliation between the initial record and what is now being reported. Name of the contact person responsible for corrective action: Andre Duhe Planned completion date for corrective action plan: March 31, 2020 If there are questions regarding this plan, please call Andre Duhe at (504) 821-2601.
GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Monitor subrecipient audit findings and compliance status.
Start monitoring →Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.