NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF STATE DIRECTORS OF SPECIAL EDUCATION

EIN: 710435097

UEI: GSA_MIGRATION

Data as of August 24, 2026

NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF STATE DIRECTORS OF SPECIAL EDUCATION4 audit years3 findings
4
Audit Years
3
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings

FY 2019-09-30

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on June 29, 2020. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by December 29, 2020 (2064 days ago).

What is a management decision? →
2019-001
Cost Allowability

Two exceptions related to controls over direct expenses were identified as part of the audit. Criteria: All expenditures of federal grant awards should be supported by documentation and approved. Cause: oIn one instance, the telephone expenses allocated to the federal award during the year were estimated due to delays in receiving invoices. Additionally, in one month tested the total personnel hours excluded 29 total hours. oIn a second instance, an employee reimbursement for allowable travel costs erroneously included reimbursement for an amount paid by the employer credit card. Context and Effect: oThe telephone cost allocation was recalculated for the entire year and the estimated excess amount charged to the major program for telephone expenses due to the above was approximately $200. oAll employee reimbursements charged to the major program were reviewed and no additional instances were noted which resulted in an overcharge to the federal award. In two instances, reimbursable expenses were noted on the expense reimbursed which were not reimbursed. The estimated excess amount charged to the major program for employee reimbursements due to the above was approximately $400. oAs a mitigating factor, one AMEX bill with expenditures allocable to the major program was not allocated to the major program within the accounting system. As a result, there were sufficient allowable costs for the major program that were not charged to the major program to fully offset the amounts noted above. Recommendations: oWe recommend the process for allocating telephone costs to federal awards be reevaluated to prevent similar reoccurrences in the future, including a review and approval of the allocation calculation. oWe recommend the process and forms for submitting employee reimbursements be re-evaluated to prevent similar recurrences in the future. oWe recommend a process be established to record credit card statements that are not fully coded in an account that will be identified and reconciled as part of the monthly reconciliation process.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Condition: Two exceptions related to controls over direct expenses were identified as part of the audit. Criteria: All expenditures of federal grant awards should be supported by documentation and approved. Cause: oIn one instance, the telephone expenses allocated to the federal award during the year were estimated due to delays in receiving invoices. Additionally, in one month tested the total personnel hours excluded 29 total hours. oIn a second instance, an employee reimbursement for allowable travel costs erroneously included reimbursement for an amount paid by the employer credit card. Context and Effect: oThe telephone cost allocation was recalculated for the entire year and the estimated excess amount charged to the major program for telephone expenses due to the above was approximately $200. oAll employee reimbursements charged to the major program were reviewed and no additional instances were noted which resulted in an overcharge to the federal award. In two instances, reimbursable expenses were noted on the expense reimbursed which were not reimbursed. The estimated excess amount charged to the major program for employee reimbursements due to the above was approximately $400. oAs a mitigating factor, one AMEX bill with expenditures allocable to the major program was not allocated to the major program within the accounting system. As a result, there were sufficient allowable costs for the major program that were not charged to the major program to fully offset the amounts noted above. Recommendations: oWe recommend the process for allocating telephone costs to federal awards be reevaluated to prevent similar reoccurrences in the future, including a review and approval of the allocation calculation. oWe recommend the process and forms for submitting employee reimbursements be re-evaluated to prevent similar recurrences in the future. oWe recommend a process be established to record credit card statements that are not fully coded in an account that will be identified and reconciled as part of the monthly reconciliation process.

Corrective Action Plan

NASDSE agrees that its documentation over direct expenses were not in accordance with best practices. NASDSE has implemented an online expense reporting called Expensify as a system for employee collection of receipts and expense management. NASDSE employees are now responsible for collecting receipts, identifying if reimbursable, adding comments and coding information accordingly. Expenses in Expensify will then be submitted to Bill.com for coding and approval. NASDSE will also improve its documentation over approvals for credit card expenses. Credit card expenses along with receipts will be input and coded in Bill.com at the end of each statement closing date. Credit card receipts will also be tied to each individual credit card statement or employee expense report for payment. A credit card clearing account will be created in QuickBooks for use in the event of any circumstance where expense and receipts are not submitted timely. Bill.com is integrated with QuickBooks and transactions are reconciled each month.

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →
2019-002
Cost Allowability

Due to the transition to a new payroll system, payroll approvals were not consistently documented in a timely manner. Criteria: Payroll costs charged to federal awards should be reviewed and approved by a responsible party. Cause: Due to the transition to a new payroll system, approvals were not consistently captured in the new payroll system at the time of the payroll. Context and Effect: Two payroll periods tested did not include supervisor approvals on all employees timesheets. The two payroll periods were after the transition to a new timekeeping and payroll service provider. The executive director denoted approval at the time of the audit. As additional context, two payrolls tested prior had documentation of approvals, and two payrolls tested later in the fiscal year had documentation of approvals. Recommendations: We recommend the policy for approval of all timesheets be followed consistently.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Condition: Due to the transition to a new payroll system, payroll approvals were not consistently documented in a timely manner. Criteria: Payroll costs charged to federal awards should be reviewed and approved by a responsible party. Cause: Due to the transition to a new payroll system, approvals were not consistently captured in the new payroll system at the time of the payroll. Context and Effect: Two payroll periods tested did not include supervisor approvals on all employees timesheets. The two payroll periods were after the transition to a new timekeeping and payroll service provider. The executive director denoted approval at the time of the audit. As additional context, two payrolls tested prior had documentation of approvals, and two payrolls tested later in the fiscal year had documentation of approvals. Recommendations: We recommend the policy for approval of all timesheets be followed consistently.

Corrective Action Plan

NASDSE agrees that it had not been properly documenting its timekeeping and approval processes over payroll costs. NASDSE has now implemented a PEO payroll provider, Insperity payroll, which requires all relevant documentation before an employee can become active. Additional processes have been put in place for better timekeeping and approval. In addition, NASDSE is in the process of updating written internal policies and procedures to provide effective and checks and balances.

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2018-09-30

FAC accepted this audit on June 27, 2019 — management decision was due December 27, 2019.

2018-002
Cost Allowability

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and compliance status.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.