Coastal Alabama Community College

EIN: 630501805

UEI: JK46KBHMQGE5

Data as of August 24, 2026

Coastal Alabama Community College10 audit years6 findings1 repeat
10
Audit Years
6
Total Findings
1
Repeat Findings

FY 2025-09-30

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on January 19, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by July 19, 2026 (36 days ago).

What is a management decision? →
2025-002
Special Tests & Provisions
MATERIAL WEAKNESS

We tested a sample of 25 withdrawn students who received financial aid. Eight instances of noncompliance were identified: the enrollment status change for 2 students was not reported to the U.S. Department of Education, and for 6 students the change in status was not reported to the U.S. Department of Education within the required 60‑day timeframe. Cause: The Enrollment Reporting Roster file is not being submitted timely or accurately to report changes in student enrollment status.Effect: The College did not correctly report student status as required under special tests and provisions compliance related to enrollment reporting. Questioned costs: None Recommendation: We recommend the College strengthen its policies and procedures related to enrollment reporting to ensure compliance with federal requirements. Views of Responsible Officials: See Management’s View and Corrective Action Plan included at the end of the report.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding 2025-002 – Special Tests and Provisions – Enrollment Reporting (Material Weakness and Noncompliance) Information on the federal program: U.S. Department of Education Student Financial Assistance Cluster Criteria: Under the Pell grant and loan programs, institutions must update the Enrollment Reporting Roster for changes in student status. Each update must include the effective date of the status change, the revised anticipated program completion date, and must be submitted electronically through either the batch reporting method or the National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS) Professional Access website. Institutions are responsible for ensuring timely and accurate reporting, whether performed directly or through a third-party servicer. Reportable changes include reductions or increases in attendance level, withdrawals, graduations, and approved leaves of absence. Condition: We tested a sample of 25 withdrawn students who received financial aid. Eight instances of noncompliance were identified: the enrollment status change for 2 students was not reported to the U.S. Department of Education, and for 6 students the change in status was not reported to the U.S. Department of Education within the required 60‑day timeframe. Cause: The Enrollment Reporting Roster file is not being submitted timely or accurately to report changes in student enrollment status.Effect: The College did not correctly report student status as required under special tests and provisions compliance related to enrollment reporting. Questioned costs: None Recommendation: We recommend the College strengthen its policies and procedures related to enrollment reporting to ensure compliance with federal requirements. Views of Responsible Officials: See Management’s View and Corrective Action Plan included at the end of the report.

Corrective Action Plan

Management’s View and Corrective Action Plan: The College is in the process of correcting this finding for future withdrawals. The College Registrar’s Office reports enrollment, which includes withdrawal’s, every 30 days. However, this finding has to do with the Failure to Pass report and incorrect LDA’s that are reported by the Instructional side of the College and indicating these dates in Banner. There are several places that LDA’s have to be updated and if one is missed it could affect the date that pulls on the Financial Aid Office’s Failure to Pass report. The Financial Aid Director and the College Registrar have already been working to ensure the accuracy of those dates for the Fall 2025 report. In addition, the Instruction Dean has been notified and informed the faculty of this error and the processes for reporting LDAs have been reiterated. The College will continue to improve the accuracy of this process.

About Special Tests and Provisions →
2025-003
Special Tests & Provisions
MATERIAL WEAKNESS

We tested a sample of 25 withdrawn students who received financial aid. Two instances of noncompliance were identified: In one instance in which the College did not properly calculate the return of Title IV funds. The College returned $1,749 but they should have only returned $555. There were nine instances in which the College had no documentation that exit counseling was completed nor did they have documentation that the College notified and sent the exit counseling materials to the student within the 30 days as required. Cause: The College did not accurately calculate the amount of aid earned and therefore returned the incorrect amount. The College could not provide documentation that the required exit counseling interviews were completed or the College attempted to contact the borrower to complete the required counseling. Effect: The College did not calculate the amount of aid earned or complete exit counseling for student borrowers under withdrawal compliance requirements. Questioned costs: None Recommendation: We recommend the College strengthen its policies and procedures related to the withdrawal process to comply with withdrawal requirements. Views of Responsible Officials: See Management’s View and Corrective Action Plan included at the end of the report.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding 2025-003 – Special Tests and Provisions – Withdrawal Testing (Material Weakness and Noncompliance) Information on the federal program: U.S. Department of Education Student Financial Assistance Cluster Criteria: 34 CFR part 668 establishes rules governing the student withdrawal process including the determination of withdrawal date, calculation of earned Title IV assistance, and return of unearned Title IV aid. Also, when a student withdraws the University must ensure exit counseling is provided to the student within 30 days in accordance with 34 CFR 685.304(b). Condition: We tested a sample of 25 withdrawn students who received financial aid. Two instances of noncompliance were identified: In one instance in which the College did not properly calculate the return of Title IV funds. The College returned $1,749 but they should have only returned $555. There were nine instances in which the College had no documentation that exit counseling was completed nor did they have documentation that the College notified and sent the exit counseling materials to the student within the 30 days as required. Cause: The College did not accurately calculate the amount of aid earned and therefore returned the incorrect amount. The College could not provide documentation that the required exit counseling interviews were completed or the College attempted to contact the borrower to complete the required counseling. Effect: The College did not calculate the amount of aid earned or complete exit counseling for student borrowers under withdrawal compliance requirements. Questioned costs: None Recommendation: We recommend the College strengthen its policies and procedures related to the withdrawal process to comply with withdrawal requirements. Views of Responsible Officials: See Management’s View and Corrective Action Plan included at the end of the report.

Corrective Action Plan

Management’s View and Corrective Action Plan: This finding has been corrected. In addition, the College has already taken corrective action to prevent this error from occurring again. First, when processing R2T4 calculations for students who populate on the end of term Failure to Pass report, students with a withdrawal date in the first two weeks of a term, will be cross checked with the Registrar’s Office to ensure that the correct LDA is being used for R2T4 calculations. The report will not automatically be assumed as correct. In addition, the Instructional Dean has been notified and informed the faculty of this error and the processes for reporting LDAs have been reiterated. In addition, to the ARGOS report used during the 2024/2025 academic year, the Financial Aid Director is using a more detailed report that is available through the ACCS. The new report and the old report will be cross-checked for accuracy. We will continue to review and modify policies to ensure that R2T4 calculations are correct.

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2024-09-30

FAC accepted this audit on February 27, 2025 — management decision was due August 27, 2025.

2024-007
Special Tests & Provisions

We tested 40 students for compliance with proper awarding. Out of those 40 tested, 2 students were incorrectly awarded Pell grant funds; 1 student was over awarded and 1 student was under awarded Pell grant funds. Cause: The College did not correctly adjust the amount of Pell grant funds awarded for the semester resulting from an enrollment status change. One student was over awarded $925 and one student was under awarded $925. Effect: The College did not adjust student financial aid packages when these students’ enrollment status changed. Questioned costs: Amounts noted above offset. Recommendation: We recommend the College strengthen its policies and procedures surrounding the packaging and awarding process to ensure compliance with federal requirements. Views of Responsible Officials: See Management’s View and Corrective Action Plan included at the end of the report.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

(Significant Deficiency and Noncompliance) Information on the federal program: U.S. Department of Education Student Financial Aid Cluster Criteria: The College is required to comply with individual program requirements when awarding a student a financial aid package. Federal Pell grants should be calculated in accordance with 34 CFR part 690.63 using the Pell Grant payment schedule and the student’s enrollment status of fulltime, three-quarters time, half-time, or less than half-time. Condition: We tested 40 students for compliance with proper awarding. Out of those 40 tested, 2 students were incorrectly awarded Pell grant funds; 1 student was over awarded and 1 student was under awarded Pell grant funds. Cause: The College did not correctly adjust the amount of Pell grant funds awarded for the semester resulting from an enrollment status change. One student was over awarded $925 and one student was under awarded $925. Effect: The College did not adjust student financial aid packages when these students’ enrollment status changed. Questioned costs: Amounts noted above offset. Recommendation: We recommend the College strengthen its policies and procedures surrounding the packaging and awarding process to ensure compliance with federal requirements. Views of Responsible Officials: See Management’s View and Corrective Action Plan included at the end of the report.

Corrective Action Plan

Management’s View and Corrective Action Plan: Management concurs with the above finding, and it has been corrected. In the case of A01441826, when the student’s enrollment was captured for Title IV eligibility (02/01), the student was enrolled in 10 credit hours. The student’s 3 credit hour CIS 146 class was deleted on 02/21 and Financial Aid was unaware. This caused the overpayment. In the case of A01454524, enrollment was captured for Title IV eligibility (02/01), the student was enrolled in 13 credit hours, but only 10 of those were in the student’s program of study. The student made an adjustment to their schedule and dropped the class that was out of program and picked up a class in program. This adjustment was not caught by Financial Aid. There is a report in ARGOS to assist with catching the multiple schedule changes. Moving forward there will be more than one person reviewing this report on a bi-weekly basis at a minimum. This report will be saved, and notes will be added so that it will be available to auditors moving forward. Corrective action will be implemented by April of 2025.

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2022-09-30

FAC accepted this audit on April 5, 2023 — management decision was due October 5, 2023.

2022-002
Reporting
REPEAT

Reference Number: 2022-002 Compliance Requirement: Reporting Type of Finding: Internal Control and Compliance Internal Control Impact: Significant Deficiency Compliance Impact: Nonmaterial Noncompliance Assistance Listing Number(s) and Title: 84.425 ? Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund (HEERF) Federal Awarding Agency: U.S. Department of Education Finding As specified in 2 CFR section 200.303 the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Adequate controls must be in place to ensure proper expenditures are reported in the applicable reporting periods. Adequate controls were not in place to review and approve grant reports for accuracy and completeness of the report prior to their submission to the grantor. Appropriate supporting documentation was not retained in order to reconcile the amounts reported on the HEERF I, II, & III Annual Performance Report Form to the College?s general ledger. Lack of sufficient controls over the review and approval of grant reports to ensure the accuracy and completeness of the report being submitted to the grantor can result in improper reporting which could lead to disallowed costs. However, our audit disclosed no instances of unallowable costs. Further, the HEERF methodology for distributing funds to students was not disclosed on the College?s website. Recommendation We recommend the strengthening of controls to ensure the quarterly grant reports are reviewed and approved for accuracy and completeness prior to submission to the grantor. Views of Responsible Officials of the Auditee The College agrees with Finding 2022-002.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Reference Number: 2022-002 Compliance Requirement: Reporting Type of Finding: Internal Control and Compliance Internal Control Impact: Significant Deficiency Compliance Impact: Nonmaterial Noncompliance Assistance Listing Number(s) and Title: 84.425 ? Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund (HEERF) Federal Awarding Agency: U.S. Department of Education Finding As specified in 2 CFR section 200.303 the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Adequate controls must be in place to ensure proper expenditures are reported in the applicable reporting periods. Adequate controls were not in place to review and approve grant reports for accuracy and completeness of the report prior to their submission to the grantor. Appropriate supporting documentation was not retained in order to reconcile the amounts reported on the HEERF I, II, & III Annual Performance Report Form to the College?s general ledger. Lack of sufficient controls over the review and approval of grant reports to ensure the accuracy and completeness of the report being submitted to the grantor can result in improper reporting which could lead to disallowed costs. However, our audit disclosed no instances of unallowable costs. Further, the HEERF methodology for distributing funds to students was not disclosed on the College?s website. Recommendation We recommend the strengthening of controls to ensure the quarterly grant reports are reviewed and approved for accuracy and completeness prior to submission to the grantor. Views of Responsible Officials of the Auditee The College agrees with Finding 2022-002.

Corrective Action Plan

Reference Number: 2022-002 Compliance Requirement: Reporting Type of Finding: Internal Control and Compliance Internal Control Impact: Significant Deficiency Compliance Impact: Nonmaterial Noncompliance Assistance Listing Number(s) and Title: 84.425 ? Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund(HEERF) Federal Awarding Agency: U.S. Department of EducationCorrective Action Plan Coastal Alabama Community College has reviewed and recognizes needed changes be put into place to ensure accurate record keeping for all reported data. Coastal will have the restricted accountant complete the quarterly and annual HEERF reports moving forward and file all data according to the report in an organized and methodical method only after the Director of Accounting has reviewed and signed off on the accuracy of the data being reported. Once the Director of Accounting and/or CFO review the reports and backup data for approval then the approved reports will be filed on-line with the Department of Education via the HEERF site. Expenditures charged against the HEERF funds are reviewed for accuracy and allowable cost through a multi-step purchasing process to ensure allowable cost only and prevent potential for improper spending. The Director of Accounting will make sure that all website required reporting is done in a timely manner moving forward. Anticipated Completion Date: June 15, 2023 Contact Person(s): Jessica Davis, Chief Financial Officer

Prior Finding References

2021-002

About Reporting →

FY 2021-09-30

FAC accepted this audit on June 23, 2022 — management decision was due December 23, 2022.

2021-001
Activities Allowed or Unallowed

Reference Number: 2021-001 Compliance Requirement: Activities Allowed/Unallowed Type of Finding: Internal Control and Compliance Internal Control Impact: Significant Deficiency Compliance Impact: Nonmaterial Noncompliance Assistance Listing Number(s) and Title(s): TRIO Cluster 84.042 TRIO-Student Support Services 84.044 TRIO ? Talent Search 84.047 TRIO ? Upward Bound Federal Awarding Agency: U. S. Department of Education Federal Award Number: P042A200284; P042A200570; P042A200160; P044A170016; P047A170391; P047A170301; P047A170316 Pass-through Entity: None Pass-through Award Number: None Questioned Costs: None Proper supporting documentation was not provided for purchase of student participant food cards. Finding The Code of Federal Regulations, Section 200.403, lists factors affecting the allowability of costs. Among other factors, the section requires that costs must be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and must be adequately documented. Proper documentation of costs helps minimize the possibility that errors or irregularities, including misappropriations and fraud could occur and not be detected. In addition, the Alabama Community College System Fiscal Procedures Manual describes the process that should be used when making purchases. The procedures described include properly requesting a purchase order and receiving merchandise prior to the payment for the items purchased. During the year, the College received a grant award under the Upward Bound Program, Assistance Listing Number 84.047, with a budget indicating that $43,000 would be allocated to the purchase of food gift cards for participants in the program. On December 10, 2020, the College direct deposited Upward Bound program funds in the amount of $4,250 to an employee?s personal checking account for the purchase of student participant food cards. Documentation revealed that the College requested documentation of the purchase of the food cards from the employee multiple times over the next year. Despite the attempts to obtain proper documentation, receipts were never provided by the employee for the purchase of the food cards. The College did not follow its normal purchase procedures which would have required documentation of the receipt of merchandise and documentation of costs of the items purchased prior to the release of funds. This allowed an employee to receive and hold $4,250 in Upward Bound program funds for almost a year without purchasing the budgeted food cards. Subsequently, the College requested the funds to be repaid by the employee. The employee repaid the funds on November 4, 2021, and separated service from the College on February 28, 2022. Recommendation The College should ensure that federal program costs are adequately documented prior to the release of program funds and that the procedures for purchases described in the Alabama Community College System Fiscal Procedures Manual are followed. Views of Responsible Officials of the Auditee Coastal Alabama Community College does not agree to the Finding 2021-001. Auditor?s Response to Views of Responsible Officials We appreciate the College?s response. All correspondence was reviewed during the audit, and we agree that approval was received for the purchase of meal cards. However, this finding is related to transferring funds to an employee?s personal bank account for the purchase of meal cards, which did not occur. In addition, the College did not obtain reimbursement from the employee until almost a year later. We reaffirm our finding.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Reference Number: 2021-001 Compliance Requirement: Activities Allowed/Unallowed Type of Finding: Internal Control and Compliance Internal Control Impact: Significant Deficiency Compliance Impact: Nonmaterial Noncompliance Assistance Listing Number(s) and Title(s): TRIO Cluster 84.042 TRIO-Student Support Services 84.044 TRIO ? Talent Search 84.047 TRIO ? Upward Bound Federal Awarding Agency: U. S. Department of Education Federal Award Number: P042A200284; P042A200570; P042A200160; P044A170016; P047A170391; P047A170301; P047A170316 Pass-through Entity: None Pass-through Award Number: None Questioned Costs: None Proper supporting documentation was not provided for purchase of student participant food cards. Finding The Code of Federal Regulations, Section 200.403, lists factors affecting the allowability of costs. Among other factors, the section requires that costs must be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and must be adequately documented. Proper documentation of costs helps minimize the possibility that errors or irregularities, including misappropriations and fraud could occur and not be detected. In addition, the Alabama Community College System Fiscal Procedures Manual describes the process that should be used when making purchases. The procedures described include properly requesting a purchase order and receiving merchandise prior to the payment for the items purchased. During the year, the College received a grant award under the Upward Bound Program, Assistance Listing Number 84.047, with a budget indicating that $43,000 would be allocated to the purchase of food gift cards for participants in the program. On December 10, 2020, the College direct deposited Upward Bound program funds in the amount of $4,250 to an employee?s personal checking account for the purchase of student participant food cards. Documentation revealed that the College requested documentation of the purchase of the food cards from the employee multiple times over the next year. Despite the attempts to obtain proper documentation, receipts were never provided by the employee for the purchase of the food cards. The College did not follow its normal purchase procedures which would have required documentation of the receipt of merchandise and documentation of costs of the items purchased prior to the release of funds. This allowed an employee to receive and hold $4,250 in Upward Bound program funds for almost a year without purchasing the budgeted food cards. Subsequently, the College requested the funds to be repaid by the employee. The employee repaid the funds on November 4, 2021, and separated service from the College on February 28, 2022. Recommendation The College should ensure that federal program costs are adequately documented prior to the release of program funds and that the procedures for purchases described in the Alabama Community College System Fiscal Procedures Manual are followed. Views of Responsible Officials of the Auditee Coastal Alabama Community College does not agree to the Finding 2021-001. Auditor?s Response to Views of Responsible Officials We appreciate the College?s response. All correspondence was reviewed during the audit, and we agree that approval was received for the purchase of meal cards. However, this finding is related to transferring funds to an employee?s personal bank account for the purchase of meal cards, which did not occur. In addition, the College did not obtain reimbursement from the employee until almost a year later. We reaffirm our finding.

Corrective Action Plan

Corrective Action Plan Coastal Alabama Community College did not agree with the above finding. The school and program were in unprecedented times during the pandemic and the Department of Education authorized the release of meal cards to the Upward Bound Program participants. Per guidance distributed by the DOE on July 1, 2020 allowances were made for the programs to adapt services to be extended during the pandemic period to still assist the program students. Each director had to make specific request for approval. Those approvals were sent via email to Sharon.Easterling@ed.gov and approvals were received for each of the three programs. All correspondence is attached to this response. The Directors could not be asked to personally pay for thousands of dollars of meal cards in advance of purchasing the cards, so funds were issued, and receipts were turned in for all programs, except one within two weeks. The program directors were instructed to turn in rosters where student signed for receipt of the meal cards as backup. These participants are in areas where we had to issue funds to the directors for the purchase of meal cards. This action only occurred due to the unique times we are in, as normal procedure would be to feed participants on-site or take them for food and pay at time of service. Anticipated Completion Date: Completed ? students are now back on-site; normal practice has been resumed. Contact Person(s): Jessica Davis, Chief Financial Officer Dr. Melinda Byrd-Murphy, Dean External Funding

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed →
2021-002
Reporting
MATERIAL WEAKNESS

Reference Number: 2021-002 Compliance Requirement: Reporting Type of Finding: Internal Control Internal Control Impact: Material Weakness Compliance Impact: Nonmaterial Noncompliance Assistance Listing Number(s) and Title(s): 84.425 ? Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund (HEERF) Federal Awarding Agency: U. S. Department of Education Federal Award Number: P425F203710; P425E202401 Pass-through Entity: None Pass-through Award Number: None Questioned Costs: None The College failed to report all expenses and to submit timely the required quarterly reports and annual report due for HEERF reporting. Finding The Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act, Coronavirus Response and Relief Supplemental Appropriations Act (CRRSAA), and the American Rescue Plan (ARP) established and funded the Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund (HEERF). The reporting requirements for HEERF funding include a Quarterly Budget and Expenditure Report (QBER). Expenditures of awards funded by HEERF I, II, III Sections 18004(a)(1) Institutional Portion, 18004(a)(2), and 18004(a)(3) should be reported using the QBER form developed by the grantor. The form is required to be posted on the institution?s primary website. The College was awarded an Institutional Portion grant under 18004(a)(1). Each of the College's quarterly reports during the fiscal year were selected for review. Audit tests revealed that the college failed to report $4,178,745.97 of lost revenues claimed from the (ARP) HEERF III Institutional portion. Quarterly reports were not submitted by the due dates for quarters ended December 31, 2020, March 31, 2021, and June 30, 2021, but instead were submitted with the September 31, 2021, quarterly report which was posted timely. The first annual performance report was which was due on February 28, 2021, was not submitted until March 17, 2021. The College did not have controls in place to ensure that report was accurate and submitted in a timely manner. Recommendation The College should ensure that adequate controls are in place to ensure compliance with the federal reporting requirements for reporting of expenses and timely submission of Quarterly Budget and Expenditure Report and submission of the annual performance report. Views of Responsible Officials of the Auditee Coastal Alabama Community College does agree to Finding 2021-002.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Reference Number: 2021-002 Compliance Requirement: Reporting Type of Finding: Internal Control Internal Control Impact: Material Weakness Compliance Impact: Nonmaterial Noncompliance Assistance Listing Number(s) and Title(s): 84.425 ? Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund (HEERF) Federal Awarding Agency: U. S. Department of Education Federal Award Number: P425F203710; P425E202401 Pass-through Entity: None Pass-through Award Number: None Questioned Costs: None The College failed to report all expenses and to submit timely the required quarterly reports and annual report due for HEERF reporting. Finding The Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act, Coronavirus Response and Relief Supplemental Appropriations Act (CRRSAA), and the American Rescue Plan (ARP) established and funded the Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund (HEERF). The reporting requirements for HEERF funding include a Quarterly Budget and Expenditure Report (QBER). Expenditures of awards funded by HEERF I, II, III Sections 18004(a)(1) Institutional Portion, 18004(a)(2), and 18004(a)(3) should be reported using the QBER form developed by the grantor. The form is required to be posted on the institution?s primary website. The College was awarded an Institutional Portion grant under 18004(a)(1). Each of the College's quarterly reports during the fiscal year were selected for review. Audit tests revealed that the college failed to report $4,178,745.97 of lost revenues claimed from the (ARP) HEERF III Institutional portion. Quarterly reports were not submitted by the due dates for quarters ended December 31, 2020, March 31, 2021, and June 30, 2021, but instead were submitted with the September 31, 2021, quarterly report which was posted timely. The first annual performance report was which was due on February 28, 2021, was not submitted until March 17, 2021. The College did not have controls in place to ensure that report was accurate and submitted in a timely manner. Recommendation The College should ensure that adequate controls are in place to ensure compliance with the federal reporting requirements for reporting of expenses and timely submission of Quarterly Budget and Expenditure Report and submission of the annual performance report. Views of Responsible Officials of the Auditee Coastal Alabama Community College does agree to Finding 2021-002.

Corrective Action Plan

Corrective Action Plan Coastal Alabama Community College agreed to finding 2021-002 and acknowledges that the original quarterly report for the period of 9/30/21 did not include $4,178,745.97 in lost revenue. This report was posted within the 10-day reporting period and the College?s fiscal year end close out was occurring. During the closeout process lost revenue was booked after the quarterly report was posted, causing the quarterly report to be incorrect. The quarterly report has been updated to reflect the correct expense. All other Quarterly and Annual reports posted late were due to miscommunication and change in personnel. It will be closely monitored for the remaining active reporting period. Anticipated Completion Date: Corrected with 9/30/21 quarterly report during audit and reports are now being monitored for timely posting. Contact Person(s): Jessica Davis, Chief Financial Officer

About Reporting →

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and compliance status.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.

Coastal Alabama Community College - Single Audit | Single Audit Intelligence