CITY OF MILAN

EIN: 626000365

UEI: SLKAFK2QRJK5

Data as of August 26, 2026

CITY OF MILAN5 audit years1 findings1 repeat
5
Audit Years
1
Total Findings
1
Repeat Findings

FY 2024-06-30

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on July 23, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by January 23, 2027 (149 days from today).

What is a management decision? →
2024-001
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability / Period of Performance / Special Tests & Provisions
MATERIAL WEAKNESSREPEAT

During our audit, the City did not identify and report federal expenditures related to Community Facilities Loans and Grants (Assistance Listing 10.766) on the originally issued SEFA for the year ended June 30, 2024. As a result, the SEFA did not include the expenditures associated with Assistance Listing 10.766, which affected the completeness of the SEFA and the related major program determination. The underlying loan and loan activity were properly recorded and disclosed in the basic financial statements. The deficiency was limited to the identification and reporting of the federal award on the SEFA, which in turn affected major program determination for single-audit purposes. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR §200.510(b) and 2 CFR §200.518, the City is responsible for preparing a complete and accurate SEFA that includes all federal awards expended during the fiscal year, including loan programs, and for identifying federal programs and determining which programs are major for purposes of the Uniform Guidance single audit. Cause: Management’s SEFA preparation and review procedures were not sufficiently designed and/or operating effectively to: 1) identify all federal programs and Assistance Listings applicable to the City’s activities, including loan programs; and 2) ensure amounts recorded in the general ledger and related financial statement balances were appropriately evaluated for federal award classification and SEFA inclusion (including evaluating whether activity recorded as loans payable/receivable or related loan activity represented federal awards expended for SEFA reporting). Effect: The omission of Assistance Listing 10.766 from the originally issued SEFA caused: 1) total federal expenditures reported on the SEFA to be understated; and 2) an error in the identification and reporting of the City’s federal award activity, which could affect the auditor’s understanding of the City’s federal award universe and the overall major program risk assessment and determination under Uniform Guidance. Questioned Cost: None Repeat Finding: Yes Recommendation: We recommend that the City strengthen internal control over compliance related to SEFA preparation and Uniform Guidance single-audit reporting by implementing procedures to ensure all federal programs are identified and properly reported on the SEFA, including loan programs. Such procedures should include at a minimum: 1) maintaining a complete listing of all federal programs (by Assistance Listing, awarding agency/pass-through entity, and award/loan identifiers) applicable to the fiscal year; 2) performing a formal annual SEFA planning process that includes inquiry of finance and program personnel and review of grant/loan agreements and communications from federal/pass-through entities to identify all federal awards; 3) incorporating targeted procedures to identify federal loan programs and related expenditures/loan balances that must be included on the SEFA, including reconciliation of loan activity and balances to SEFA amounts and required SEFA disclosures; and 4) performing an independent review of the draft SEFA and the major program determination to confirm completeness and accuracy prior to issuance. Response: The City will strengthen internal controls over SEFA identification and preparation to ensure compliance with Uniform Guidance single-audit requirements. The City will also implement enhanced review and communication procedures with external auditors, as the condition was significantly impacted by deficiencies in the auditors’ evaluation and classification of major programs during the audit process.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Inaccurate Grant Reporting (Material Weakness) Assistance Listing: 10.766 Federal Program: Community Facilities Loans and Grants Condition: During our audit, the City did not identify and report federal expenditures related to Community Facilities Loans and Grants (Assistance Listing 10.766) on the originally issued SEFA for the year ended June 30, 2024. As a result, the SEFA did not include the expenditures associated with Assistance Listing 10.766, which affected the completeness of the SEFA and the related major program determination. The underlying loan and loan activity were properly recorded and disclosed in the basic financial statements. The deficiency was limited to the identification and reporting of the federal award on the SEFA, which in turn affected major program determination for single-audit purposes. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR §200.510(b) and 2 CFR §200.518, the City is responsible for preparing a complete and accurate SEFA that includes all federal awards expended during the fiscal year, including loan programs, and for identifying federal programs and determining which programs are major for purposes of the Uniform Guidance single audit. Cause: Management’s SEFA preparation and review procedures were not sufficiently designed and/or operating effectively to: 1) identify all federal programs and Assistance Listings applicable to the City’s activities, including loan programs; and 2) ensure amounts recorded in the general ledger and related financial statement balances were appropriately evaluated for federal award classification and SEFA inclusion (including evaluating whether activity recorded as loans payable/receivable or related loan activity represented federal awards expended for SEFA reporting). Effect: The omission of Assistance Listing 10.766 from the originally issued SEFA caused: 1) total federal expenditures reported on the SEFA to be understated; and 2) an error in the identification and reporting of the City’s federal award activity, which could affect the auditor’s understanding of the City’s federal award universe and the overall major program risk assessment and determination under Uniform Guidance. Questioned Cost: None Repeat Finding: Yes Recommendation: We recommend that the City strengthen internal control over compliance related to SEFA preparation and Uniform Guidance single-audit reporting by implementing procedures to ensure all federal programs are identified and properly reported on the SEFA, including loan programs. Such procedures should include at a minimum: 1) maintaining a complete listing of all federal programs (by Assistance Listing, awarding agency/pass-through entity, and award/loan identifiers) applicable to the fiscal year; 2) performing a formal annual SEFA planning process that includes inquiry of finance and program personnel and review of grant/loan agreements and communications from federal/pass-through entities to identify all federal awards; 3) incorporating targeted procedures to identify federal loan programs and related expenditures/loan balances that must be included on the SEFA, including reconciliation of loan activity and balances to SEFA amounts and required SEFA disclosures; and 4) performing an independent review of the draft SEFA and the major program determination to confirm completeness and accuracy prior to issuance. Response: The City will strengthen internal controls over SEFA identification and preparation to ensure compliance with Uniform Guidance single-audit requirements. The City will also implement enhanced review and communication procedures with external auditors, as the condition was significantly impacted by deficiencies in the auditors’ evaluation and classification of major programs during the audit process.

Corrective Action Plan

Person Responsible for Implementing the Correction Plan: Autumn Stewart, City Recorder Anticipated Completion Date: June 30, 2026 Repeat Finding: Yes Reason Corrective Action Was Not Taken: Issue was found in the 2025 audit, so was not known at the time. Planned Corrective Action: The City will strengthen internal controls over SEFA identification and preparation to ensure compliance with Uniform Guidance single-audit requirements. The City will also implement enhanced review and communication procedures with external auditors, as the condition was significantly impacted by deficiencies in the auditors’ evaluation and classification of major programs during the audit process.

Prior Finding References

2023-001

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles, Period of Performance, Special Tests and Provisions →

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and compliance status.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.