DEERFIELD BEACH HOUSING AUTHORITY

EIN: 620719631

UEI: LKB2GSBL4Q24

Data as of August 20, 2026

12
Audit Years
5
Total Findings
2
Repeat Findings

FY 2025-09-30

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on June 30, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by December 30, 2026 (131 days from today).

What is a management decision? →
2025-001
Eligibility
Condition

Tenant File Documentation Maintenance (Significant Deficiency, Noncompliance) Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher Program – Assistance Listing No. 14.871; Grant Period- Fiscal Year-End September 30, 2025 Criteria The Housing Choice Voucher Program Guidebook, the Code of Federal Regulations and HUD PIH Notices provide requirements and guidance for which the Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher Program is to be administered and operated under with respect to tenant eligibility and reexaminations, and document maintenance. Condition and Perspective During audit fieldwork, forty Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher Program participant tenant files were requested for review for compliance with Program eligibility, reexamination and document maintenance requirements. The review results noted the following omissions: 1) 7 files did not contain HUD Form 52517 Request for Tenancy Approval 2) 3 files did not contain HUD Form 9886 or 9886-A Authorization for Release of Information/Privacy Act Notice 3) 2 files did not contain HUD Form 52641 HAP Contract and HUD Form 52641-A Tenancy Addendum 4) 1 file did not contain HUD Form 50058 Family Report Questioned Costs – None noted Cause Deficiency over tenant file documentation maintenance requirements. Effect Non-compliance with tenant file documentation maintenance requirements. Recommendation We recommend that the Authority catalog and maintain all required tenant file documents in accordance with federal requirements and the Authority’s internal policies.Management’s Response Management's Response- The Authority will catalog and maintain all required tenant file documents in accordance with federal requirements and the Authority’s internal policies. Ms. LaTonya Coley-McKenley, Executive Director, has assumed the responsibility of executing this corrective action by August 1, 2026.

Corrective Action Plan

The Authority will catalog and maintain all required tenant file documents in accordance with federal requirements and the Authority’s internal policies. Ms. LaTonya Coley-McKenley, Executive Director, has assumed the responsibility of executing this corrective action by August 1, 2026.

About Eligibility →
2025-002
Reporting
Condition

SEMAP Reporting (Significant Deficiency, Noncompliance) Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher Program – Assistance Listing No. 14.871; Grant Period- Fiscal Year-End September 30, 2025 Criteria The Authority was required to submit its Section Eight Management Assessment Program (SEMAP) certification to HUD within sixty days of its fiscal year-end, by November 29, 2025. Condition and Perspective The Authority did not submit its SEMAP certification by the November 2025 due date. Questioned Costs – None noted Cause Deficiency over HUD’s SEMAP reporting requirements. Effect Non-compliance with HUD’s SEMAP reporting requirements. Recommendation We recommend that the Authority submit its SEMAP certification to HUD within sixty days of its fiscal year-end. Management’s Response The Authority will submit its SEMAP certification to HUD within sixty days of its fiscal year-end. Ms. LaTonya Coley-McKenley, Executive Director, has assumed the responsibility of executing this corrective action by November 29, 2026.

Corrective Action Plan

The Authority will submit its SEMAP certification to HUD within sixty days of its fiscal year-end. Ms. LaTonya Coley-McKenley, Executive Director, has assumed the responsibility of executing this corrective action by November 29, 2026.

About Reporting →

FY 2024-09-30

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on June 30, 2025. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by December 30, 2025, which was (234 days ago).

What is a management decision? →
2024-001
Reporting
REPEAT
Condition

US Department of Housing and Urban Development Direct Award Program Name: Housing Voucher Center Cluster Internal Control Significant Deficiency L Reporting AL Number: 14.871 2024-001 Unaudited Submission Criteria: Financial Data Schedule (FDS) submission for unaudited financials are due within 2 months after the fiscal year end (24 CFR section 5.801). Condition: Management missed the deadline for its unaudited REAC FDS submission. Context: The Authority 's unaudited FDS submission was due on December 15th, 2024. The Authority did not submit the submission until February 2025. Cause: Management misinterpreted the deadline for the unaudited FDS submission for PHA's. Effect: The Authority is not in compliance with the reporting guidelines outlined in the HCV compliance supplement. Recommendations: The Authority needs to improve its internal controls over financial reporting by submitting its financial data on a timelier basis. Management Views: Management agrees with the finding, see Management's Corrective Action Plan.

Corrective Action Plan

Management’s Corrective Action Plan Program Name: Name of Federal Program or Cluster CFDA Number:14.871 2024-001: Unaudited Submission Criteria: Financial Data Schedule (FDS) submission for unaudited financials are due within 2 months after the fiscal year end (24 CFR section 5.801) Condition: Management missed the deadline for its unaudited REAC FDS submission. Context: The Authority’s unaudited FDS submission was due on December 15th 2024. The Authority did not submit the submission until February 2025. Management Response: A compliance calendar has been implemented and is maintained by both the Finance Director and Executive Director to track HUD and REAC deadlines. The unaudited FDS will be finalized and submitted no later than 5 business days prior to the formal due date, allowing sufficient buffer time. Oversight and reminders are issued monthly by the Chief Financial Officer to ensure proper tracking and timely filing. As well, additional staff is being crossed train so that the agency will not dependent one person for FDS Submission.

Prior Finding References

2023-001

About Reporting →
2024-002
Activities Allowed or Unallowed
REPEAT
Condition

Program Name: Housing Voucher Center Cluster Internal Control Significant Deficiency A Allowable Exp AL Number: 14.871 2024-002 INTERPROGRAM DUE TO/DUE FROM ACTIVITIES Criteria: According to HUD Accounting Brief #14, Due To/Due From relationships should not be reported under accrual accounting simply from the result of a PHA using a common checking or working capital account. Because of the basic nature of most Federal and state programs, resources from one program cannot be used to support the costs of another program. HUD views Due To’s and Due From’s reported in a PHA’s Federal programs as possible indicators of non-compliance. Condition: The Authority has interfund receivables and payables that have not been repaid as of fiscal year end. This results in certain programs having a negative cash balance as of fiscal year end. Context: The Authority reported a material ($134,558 in total, $42,682 in HCV program) amount of interfund receivables and payables, which is a significant red flag for HUD reviewers. Cause: The Authority was not effectively monitoring and managing interfund program balances in order to ensure that programs were not spending funds that they do not have. Effect: The use of Due to/ Due From transactions reported in the Authority's financials net to some programs having negative cash balances, which could signify to HUD that one or more programs have used resources to cover the costs of another program. Recommendations: The Authority should expand it's controls over cash reconciliations to include a step to verify if a program, fund or component unit is accurate along with the entire cash pool. Also interfund should be repaid monthly at a minimum. Management Views: Management agrees with the finding, see Management's Corrective Action Plan.

Corrective Action Plan

Management’s Corrective Action Plan Program Name: Name of Federal Program or Cluster CFDA Number:14.871 2023-002: Interprogram Due To/Due From Activities Criteria: According to PHA Accounting Brief #14, Due To/Due From relationships should not be reported under accrual accounting simply from the result of a PHA using a common checking or working capital account. Because of the basic nature of most Federal and state programs, resources from one program cannot be used to support the cost of another program. HUD views Due To’s and Due From’s reported in a PHA ‘s Federal programs as possible indicators of noncompliance. Condition: The Authority has inter-fund receivables and payables that have not been repaid as of fiscal year-end. This results in certain programs having a negative cash balance as of the fiscal year end. Context: The Authority’s reported a ($33,461 in HCV program and $154,268 Mainstream) interfund payable due to Business Skill Center (nonfederal program ) which is a significant red flag for HUD reviewers. Management Response: The $33,461 due from the Housing Choice Voucher (HCV) program to Business Skill Center represents the use of non-federal funds to cover HCV’s monthly payroll and benefit expenses, which typically range from $30,000 to $35,000. These expenses are temporarily paid by Business Skill Center and reimbursed within 30 days upon receipt of HCV Administrative Fee funding from HUD. The $154,268 due from the Mainstream program to Business Skill Center non-federal funds resulted from a funding shortfall that occurred during the transition of Mainstream Vouchers from the Dania Housing Authority to the Deerfield Beach Housing Authority. During this period, the Deerfield Beach Housing Authority had to apply for and await the disbursement of Mainstream Shortfall funds from HUD. As these funds were received over a period of 3 to 4 months, the Business Skill Center covered costs using non-federal funds, which were later reimbursed.

Prior Finding References

2023-002

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed →
2024-003
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability
QUESTIONED COSTS
Condition

Program Name Housing Choice Voucher Internal Control Significant Deficiency A/B Allowable Activities; Allowable costs/Cost principles CFDA Number 14.871 2024-003 FSS Liability and Insufficient Cash Questioned Costs $11,990. Amount restricted cash is short covering FSS liability. Criteria "HUD’s FSS Program Regulations (24 CFR 984.305): Specifically for the FSS program, this regulation governs the management of FSS escrow accounts, which are funded using HAP funds for HCV participants. These escrow funds are restricted to deposits for participants’ savings accounts based on increased rent due to earned income. Using these funds for other purposes, such as covering unrelated HA expenses, is unallowable. " Condition During our audit we noted that the Authority's HCV program did not have sufficient cash to cover the FSS liability Context Per the Authority's FSS escrow liability listing, there should $168,705 in an escrow account. The Authority only has $156,715 in this account, leaving it short by $11,990. The Authority only has $585 in unrestricted HCV causse the program to have insufficient cash to cover the liability Cause Short-term cash shortages, improper use of funds, and lack of controls surrounding the management of restricted cash. Effect As a result, the Program was $11,990 short of the required restricted FSS cash balance to cover the FSS liability. Recommendations The Authority should replenish the HCV program's FSS. cash balance as soon as possible. Management Views Management agrees.

Corrective Action Plan

Management’s Corrective Action Plan Program Name: Name of Federal Program or Cluster CFDA Number:14.871 2024-003: FSS Liability and Insufficient Cash Criteria: FSS Program Regulations (24 CFR 984.305): Specifically for the FSS program, this regulation governs the management of FSS escrow accounts, which are funded using HAP funds for HCV participants. These escrow funds are restricted to deposits for participants’ savings accounts based on increased rent due to earned income. Using these funds for other purposes, such as covering unrelated HA expenses, is unallowable. Condition: During our audit we noted that the Authority’s HCV program did have sufficient cash to cover the FSS liability Context: Per the authority’s FSS escrow liability listing, there should be $168,708 in escrow account. The Authority only has $156,715 in this account, leaving it short by $11,990. The Authority only has $585 in unrestricted HCV cause the program to insufficient cash to cover liability. Management Response: Due to the HCV program being in shortfall and awaiting set-aside funding during this period, it was significantly challenging to consistently fund the Family Self-Sufficiency (FSS) liability on a monthly basis. However, once sufficient funding was received, the issue was fully resolved.

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and compliance status.

Start monitoring →

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

DEERFIELD BEACH HOUSING AUTHORITY - Single Audit | Single Audit Intelligence