EIN: 611007219
UEI: USLJJGAQPEZ5
Data as of August 24, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on April 10, 2025. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by October 10, 2025 (318 days ago).
What is a management decision? →The District has not adopted written policies as required by 200.318(a) and 200.319(c) that are consistent with the methods of procurement outlined in Section 200.320 of the Uniform Guidance. Cause: The District received federal funds for a construction project. The District typically does not receive federal funding and is unfamiliar with the written procurement requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Effect: The District did not have written procurement policies that complied with the procurement standards of Uniform Guidance. However, due to the State’s threshold for bidding and oversight requirements of the program, the District complied, in all material respects, with the procurement methods allowed under the Uniform Guidance. Recommendation: We recommend that the District document written procurement policies that comply with the Uniform Guidance and include in those policies the allowed methods of procurement under Section 200.320. Response: Management agrees with the finding and will prepare or have prepared a written procurement policy which complies with the requirements of Uniform Guidance.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Criteria: In accordance with Uniform Guidance, Section 200.318(a), and 200.319(c) a non-Federal entity must have written procurement procedures that conform to procurement methods identified in the Uniform Guidance at Section 200.320. Condition: The District has not adopted written policies as required by 200.318(a) and 200.319(c) that are consistent with the methods of procurement outlined in Section 200.320 of the Uniform Guidance. Cause: The District received federal funds for a construction project. The District typically does not receive federal funding and is unfamiliar with the written procurement requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Effect: The District did not have written procurement policies that complied with the procurement standards of Uniform Guidance. However, due to the State’s threshold for bidding and oversight requirements of the program, the District complied, in all material respects, with the procurement methods allowed under the Uniform Guidance. Recommendation: We recommend that the District document written procurement policies that comply with the Uniform Guidance and include in those policies the allowed methods of procurement under Section 200.320. Response: Management agrees with the finding and will prepare or have prepared a written procurement policy which complies with the requirements of Uniform Guidance.
The District has for many years adhered to the Uniform Guidance procurement codes as established under Section 200.320. The East Casey County Water District shall follow all State and Federal Guidelines as they relate to procurement.
2023-003
The District did not record federal grant income or expenses for the Water and Waste Disposal Systems for Rural Communities program. Cause: The District failed to have internal controls to properly record all federal grant activity and identify federal funds. Effect: The District did not record federal grant income or expenditures for the Water and Waste Disposal Systems for Rural Communities. The exclusion resulted in a material misstatement of contributed capital and construction in process. In addition, management engaged the auditor to prepare the schedule of expenditure of federal awards. Management reviewed, approved and accepted responsibility for the schedule of expenditure of federal awards prior to its issuance. Recommendation: We recommend that management review their procedures for identifying federal funds and review the costs and benefits involved to retain a consultant with the required expertise to prepare the schedule of expenditure of federal awards. Response: Management agrees with the finding and will review internal control procedures related to the recording of federal grant activity and cost to retain a consultant with the required expertise to prepare the schedule of expenditure of federal awards.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Criteria: The District is required to have internal controls in place that enable it to prepare complete financial statements, including the schedule of expenditure of federal awards in accordance with generally accepted accounting standards and in accordance with the Uniform Guidance at 2 CFR 200.510(b). Condition: The District did not record federal grant income or expenses for the Water and Waste Disposal Systems for Rural Communities program. Cause: The District failed to have internal controls to properly record all federal grant activity and identify federal funds. Effect: The District did not record federal grant income or expenditures for the Water and Waste Disposal Systems for Rural Communities. The exclusion resulted in a material misstatement of contributed capital and construction in process. In addition, management engaged the auditor to prepare the schedule of expenditure of federal awards. Management reviewed, approved and accepted responsibility for the schedule of expenditure of federal awards prior to its issuance. Recommendation: We recommend that management review their procedures for identifying federal funds and review the costs and benefits involved to retain a consultant with the required expertise to prepare the schedule of expenditure of federal awards. Response: Management agrees with the finding and will review internal control procedures related to the recording of federal grant activity and cost to retain a consultant with the required expertise to prepare the schedule of expenditure of federal awards.
The District has determined that it is more cost effective to continue to engage the auditor to prepare the schedule of expenditure of federal awards.
FAC accepted this audit on April 18, 2024 — management decision was due October 18, 2024.
The District has not adopted written policies as required by 200.318(a) and 200.319(c) that are consistent with the methods of procurement outlined in Section 200.320 of the Uniform Guidance. Cause: The District received federal funds as part of loan drawdowns for a construction project. The District typically does not receive federal funding and is unfamiliar with the written procurement requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Effect: The District did not have written procurement policies that complied with the procurement standards of Uniform Guidance. However, due to State threshold’s for bidding and oversight requirements of the loan program, the District complied, in all material respects, with the procurement methods allowed under the Uniform Guidance. Recommendation: We recommend that the District document written procurement policies that comply with the Uniform Guidance and include in those policies the allowed methods of procurement under Section 200.320. Response: Management agrees with the finding and will prepare or have prepared a written procurement policy which complies with the requirements of Uniform Guidance.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Criteria: In accordance with Uniform Guidance, Section 200.318(a), and 200.319(c) a non-Federal entity must have written procurement procedures that conform to procurement methods identified in the Uniform Guidance at Section 200.320. Condition: The District has not adopted written policies as required by 200.318(a) and 200.319(c) that are consistent with the methods of procurement outlined in Section 200.320 of the Uniform Guidance. Cause: The District received federal funds as part of loan drawdowns for a construction project. The District typically does not receive federal funding and is unfamiliar with the written procurement requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Effect: The District did not have written procurement policies that complied with the procurement standards of Uniform Guidance. However, due to State threshold’s for bidding and oversight requirements of the loan program, the District complied, in all material respects, with the procurement methods allowed under the Uniform Guidance. Recommendation: We recommend that the District document written procurement policies that comply with the Uniform Guidance and include in those policies the allowed methods of procurement under Section 200.320. Response: Management agrees with the finding and will prepare or have prepared a written procurement policy which complies with the requirements of Uniform Guidance.
The District has for many years adhered to the Uniform Guidance procurement codes as established under Section 200.320. The East Casey County Water District shall follow all State and Federal Guidelines as they relate to procurement.
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Monitor subrecipient audit findings and compliance status.
Start monitoring →© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.