Homeless and Hunger Coalition of Northwest Florida, Inc.

EIN: 592853138

UEI: P3QHBQHRD5F5

Data as of August 23, 2026

Homeless and Hunger Coalition of Northwest Florida, Inc.3 audit years4 findings2 repeat
3
Audit Years
4
Total Findings
2
Repeat Findings

FY 2023-06-30

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on March 29, 2024. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by September 29, 2024 (693 days ago).

What is a management decision? →
2023-002
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability / Equipment & Real Property / Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking / Procurement & Suspension/Debarment / Special Tests & Provisions
MATERIAL WEAKNESSREPEAT

Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Program: Emergency Solutions Grant & Emergency Solutions Grant – CV (CFDA No. 14.231) Finding Type: Material Weakness Questioned Costs: None Material Weakness: As discussed at Finding 2023-001, the Coalition's internal control procedure, which requires both the executive director and an additional authorized signer to approve invoices, has not been implemented. This step is essential for ensuring that expenses align with grant requirements, thereby offering a safeguard through the implementation of the Coalition's internal controls. The existing procedures mandate supervisory approval of documentation before the authorization of expenses for payment, but documentation was apparently not filed or notated correctly. This situation provides the opportunity for expenditures that do not comply with grant stipulations to occur without being detected promptly. It is recommended that the Coalition implement and follow controls adopted, including requiring the Executive Director along with one additional authorized signer to review all supporting documentation related to each expense and upon review, notate their approval with signature as audit evidence. The Coalition will implement the correction action plan discussed at Finding 2023-001 over all federal and state programs.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Program: Emergency Solutions Grant & Emergency Solutions Grant – CV (CFDA No. 14.231) Finding Type: Material Weakness Questioned Costs: None Material Weakness: As discussed at Finding 2023-001, the Coalition's internal control procedure, which requires both the executive director and an additional authorized signer to approve invoices, has not been implemented. This step is essential for ensuring that expenses align with grant requirements, thereby offering a safeguard through the implementation of the Coalition's internal controls. The existing procedures mandate supervisory approval of documentation before the authorization of expenses for payment, but documentation was apparently not filed or notated correctly. This situation provides the opportunity for expenditures that do not comply with grant stipulations to occur without being detected promptly. It is recommended that the Coalition implement and follow controls adopted, including requiring the Executive Director along with one additional authorized signer to review all supporting documentation related to each expense and upon review, notate their approval with signature as audit evidence. The Coalition will implement the correction action plan discussed at Finding 2023-001 over all federal and state programs.

Corrective Action Plan

The Executive Director and one other authorized signer will be required to review all supporting documentation for State or Federal Award program expense paid with any with any type of grant funding using the updated two signature paymont request form which specifies which grant fund is being used. Routine indirect general office expenses will require approval by the Executive Director and a second authorized signer. However, the invoice may be reviewed and initialed, omitting the payment request form. However, any funding that is used as a grant administrative cost, will require the two-signature payment request form.

Prior Finding References

2022-002

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles, Equipment and Real Property Management, Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking, Procurement and Suspension and Debarment, Special Tests and Provisions →
2023-003
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability / Equipment & Real Property / Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking / Procurement & Suspension/Debarment / Special Tests & Provisions

The Coalition does not have controls in place to ensure that level of effort and earmarking grant requirements are met. Criteria: The Coalition should have controls in place in order to provide reasonable assurance that level of effort, and earmarking grant requirements are met. Cause: Lack of proper controls over grant compliance requirements. Effect: The situation provides an opportunity for specific benchmarks within grant agreements to not be met and detected promptly. Recommendation: The Coalition should implement controls to ensure that all level of effort, earmarking, and other benchmarks as indicated in the grant agreements are met. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The Coalition shall maintain ongoing and updated guidance compliance requirements regarding the deliverables and administrative fees on each individual funding source as stated in grant documents and amendments from private, state, and federal sources. It will be the responsibility of executive staff to review on a monthly basis to make sure current guidance is followed.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Program: Emergency Solutions Grant & Emergency Solutions Grant – CV (CFDA No. 14.231) Finding Type: Significant Deficiency Questioned Costs: None Condition: The Coalition does not have controls in place to ensure that level of effort and earmarking grant requirements are met. Criteria: The Coalition should have controls in place in order to provide reasonable assurance that level of effort, and earmarking grant requirements are met. Cause: Lack of proper controls over grant compliance requirements. Effect: The situation provides an opportunity for specific benchmarks within grant agreements to not be met and detected promptly. Recommendation: The Coalition should implement controls to ensure that all level of effort, earmarking, and other benchmarks as indicated in the grant agreements are met. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The Coalition shall maintain ongoing and updated guidance compliance requirements regarding the deliverables and administrative fees on each individual funding source as stated in grant documents and amendments from private, state, and federal sources. It will be the responsibility of executive staff to review on a monthly basis to make sure current guidance is followed.

Corrective Action Plan

The Coalition shall maintain ongoing and updated guidance compliance requirements regarding the deliverables and administrative fees on each individual funding source as stated in grant documents and amendments from private, state, and federal sources. It will be the responsibility of executive staff to review on a monthly basis to make sure current guidance is followed.

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles, Equipment and Real Property Management, Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking, Procurement and Suspension and Debarment, Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2022-06-30

FAC accepted this audit on October 26, 2023 — management decision was due April 26, 2024.

2022-002
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability / Equipment & Real Property / Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking / Procurement & Suspension/Debarment / Special Tests & Provisions
MATERIAL WEAKNESSREPEAT

Documentation of proper approval on 14 selected major program expense transactions could not be located. Criteria: The Coalition’s internal controls require an authorized signature of approval by the Operations Director for all payment requests. Cause: Procedures are in place for supervisory approval of documentation before expenses are authorized for payment, but documentation was apparently not filed or notated correctly. Effect: The situation provides opportunity for unauthorized transactions to be made and not detected in a timely manner. Recommendation: Management should review all supporting documentation for every disbursement and, if approved, notate their approval with signature as audit evidence. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: All check requests will be reviewed and signed by the Executive Director and initialed by one authorized check signer. Invoices will be reviewed and initialed by the Executive Director and initialed by one authorized check signer. Checks will be signed by two authorized individuals. Checks and invoices will be reviewed for completion prior to copying and distributing.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Program: Emergency Solutions Grant & Emergency Solutions Grant – CV (CFDA No. 14.231) Finding Type: Material Weakness Questioned Costs: None Condition: Documentation of proper approval on 14 selected major program expense transactions could not be located. Criteria: The Coalition’s internal controls require an authorized signature of approval by the Operations Director for all payment requests. Cause: Procedures are in place for supervisory approval of documentation before expenses are authorized for payment, but documentation was apparently not filed or notated correctly. Effect: The situation provides opportunity for unauthorized transactions to be made and not detected in a timely manner. Recommendation: Management should review all supporting documentation for every disbursement and, if approved, notate their approval with signature as audit evidence. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: All check requests will be reviewed and signed by the Executive Director and initialed by one authorized check signer. Invoices will be reviewed and initialed by the Executive Director and initialed by one authorized check signer. Checks will be signed by two authorized individuals. Checks and invoices will be reviewed for completion prior to copying and distributing.

Corrective Action Plan

All check requests will be reviewed and signed by the Executive director and initial by one authorized check signer. Invoices will be reviewed and initialed by the Executive Director and initialed by one authorized check signer. Checks will be signed by two authorized individuals. Checks and invoices will be reviewed for completion prior to copying and distributing. Corrective action plan was implemented August 23,2022.

Prior Finding References

2021-003

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles, Equipment and Real Property Management, Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking, Procurement and Suspension and Debarment, Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2021-06-30

FAC accepted this audit on November 2, 2022 — management decision was due May 2, 2023.

2021-003
Other
MATERIAL WEAKNESS

Documentation of proper approval on 14 selected major program expense transactions could not be located. In addition, two selected expense transactions paid with a check were missing one of two authorized signatures. Criteria: The Coalition?s internal controls require an authorized signature of approval by the Operations Director for all payment requests. Once approved the request for payment is sent to the Executive Director for review and signature on check disbursement. A second signature must also be obtained by a Board Member before the items becomes a fully negotiable legal document (dual signature requirement).Cause: Procedures are in place for supervisory approval of documentation before expenses are authorized for payment, but documentation was apparently not filed or notated correctly. Effect: The situation provides opportunity for unauthorized transactions to be made and not detected in a timely manner. Recommendation: Management should review all supporting documentation for every disbursement and, if approved, notate their approval with signature as audit evidence. Also, when dual signatures are required, per Coalition policy, two authorized signatures on each check should be made before disbursement is issued. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: All check requests will be reviewed and signed by the Operations Director and initialed by one authorized check signer. Invoices will be reviewed and initialed by the Operations Director and initialed by one authorized check signer. Checks will be signed by two authorized individuals. Checks and invoices will be reviewed for completion prior to copying and distributing.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2021-003 Lack of Approval on Major Program Disbursements Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Program: Emergency Solutions Grant & Emergency Solutions Grant ? CV (CFDA No. 14.231) Finding Type: Material Weakness Questioned Costs: None Condition: Documentation of proper approval on 14 selected major program expense transactions could not be located. In addition, two selected expense transactions paid with a check were missing one of two authorized signatures. Criteria: The Coalition?s internal controls require an authorized signature of approval by the Operations Director for all payment requests. Once approved the request for payment is sent to the Executive Director for review and signature on check disbursement. A second signature must also be obtained by a Board Member before the items becomes a fully negotiable legal document (dual signature requirement).Cause: Procedures are in place for supervisory approval of documentation before expenses are authorized for payment, but documentation was apparently not filed or notated correctly. Effect: The situation provides opportunity for unauthorized transactions to be made and not detected in a timely manner. Recommendation: Management should review all supporting documentation for every disbursement and, if approved, notate their approval with signature as audit evidence. Also, when dual signatures are required, per Coalition policy, two authorized signatures on each check should be made before disbursement is issued. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: All check requests will be reviewed and signed by the Operations Director and initialed by one authorized check signer. Invoices will be reviewed and initialed by the Operations Director and initialed by one authorized check signer. Checks will be signed by two authorized individuals. Checks and invoices will be reviewed for completion prior to copying and distributing.

Corrective Action Plan

Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: All check requests will be reviewed and signed by the Operations Director and initialed by one authorized check signer. Invoices will be reviewed and initialed by the Operations Director and initialed by one authorized check signer. Checks will be signed by two authorized individuals. Checks and invoices will be reviewed for completion prior to copying and distributing.

About Other →

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and compliance status.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.