United Way of West Florida, Inc

EIN: 590651076

UEI: ZEHAMBW7JDL6

Data as of August 24, 2026

United Way of West Florida, Inc2 audit years3 findings
2
Audit Years
3
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings

FY 2024-06-30

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on April 1, 2025. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by October 1, 2025 (328 days ago).

What is a management decision? →
2024-003
Reporting

During the audit, it was identified that the organization did not adequately track unspent and unearned grant funds. As a result, certain amounts of unspent funds were not identified or reported in a timely manner, and the organization did not return these funds to the grant provider as required by the grant agreement until requested. This failure to properly track and report unspent funds led to the identification of amounts due back to the grant provider, which were not properly accounted for in the financial statements Cause: The cause of this deficiency appears to be the lack of a formalized tracking system for unspent and unearned grant funds. There were no clear processes in place to ensure that unspent or unearned funds were identified, monitored, and reported regularly. Additionally, there was insufficient oversight to ensure that grant conditions regarding the return of unspent funds were being met. The absence of a centralized system for tracking grant fund usage and compliance led to this oversight, and there was no clear process for notifying the responsible parties about amounts that needed to be returned. Effect: As a result of this deficiency, the organization failed to return unspent and unearned funds to the grant provider in accordance with the terms of the grant agreements. This could lead to potential non-compliance issues. The failure to track these funds also resulted in misstatements in the financial statements, as the amounts due back to the grant provider were not properly reflected. Context: This finding is part of the broader financial statement close process, with specific implications for the management of grant funds. It is essential to ensure that all unspent or unearned grant funds are properly tracked and returned when necessary. The failure to do so exposes the organization to financial, legal, and reputational risks that could affect its ability to secure future grants or maintain compliance with current grant conditions. Recommendation: It is recommended that the organization implement a formalized process for tracking unspent and unearned grant funds. This process should include regularly reviewing grant agreements to ensure compliance with return provisions, setting up a system to track fund usage by grant, and identifying any unspent or unearned funds that need to be returned. The organization should assign responsibility for monitoring grant balances and ensure that regular reconciliations between general ledgers and grant tracking systems are performed. Management should also implement stronger oversight and internal controls to ensure that grant funds are tracked accurately, with designated staff ensuring compliance with all grant terms, including timely reporting and returning of unspent funds. Additionally, staff responsible for managing grants should receive training on proper tracking procedures, and a clear process should be developed for returning any unspent or unearned funds to the grant provider. Views of Responsible Officials: The responsible officials acknowledge the audit finding and agree that the failure to track unspent and unearned grant funds properly resulted in funds that should have been returned to the grant provider not being reported or remitted as required. They recognize the importance of adhering to grant terms and ensuring that unspent or unearned funds are properly monitored. The organization is committed to addressing this deficiency by establishing a formalized and centralized system for tracking all grant funds, including unspent or unearned amounts. The officials plan to implement a clear process for regularly reviewing grant status and ensuring compliance with all return provisions. They also recognize the need for improved internal controls and oversight to prevent similar issues in the future. Management is committed to enhancing its processes and will provide the necessary training to staff to ensure that these procedures are followed correctly moving forward.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Criteria: Organizations must ensure accurate tracking of unspent and unearned grant funds. Unspent funds and unearned revenues should be properly identified and recorded in financial statements, and the organization must ensure compliance with grant terms, including returning any funds that were not spent or earned as required by the grant agreement. Failure to comply with these requirements can result in financial misstatements and the need to return funds to the grant provider. Condition: During the audit, it was identified that the organization did not adequately track unspent and unearned grant funds. As a result, certain amounts of unspent funds were not identified or reported in a timely manner, and the organization did not return these funds to the grant provider as required by the grant agreement until requested. This failure to properly track and report unspent funds led to the identification of amounts due back to the grant provider, which were not properly accounted for in the financial statements Cause: The cause of this deficiency appears to be the lack of a formalized tracking system for unspent and unearned grant funds. There were no clear processes in place to ensure that unspent or unearned funds were identified, monitored, and reported regularly. Additionally, there was insufficient oversight to ensure that grant conditions regarding the return of unspent funds were being met. The absence of a centralized system for tracking grant fund usage and compliance led to this oversight, and there was no clear process for notifying the responsible parties about amounts that needed to be returned. Effect: As a result of this deficiency, the organization failed to return unspent and unearned funds to the grant provider in accordance with the terms of the grant agreements. This could lead to potential non-compliance issues. The failure to track these funds also resulted in misstatements in the financial statements, as the amounts due back to the grant provider were not properly reflected. Context: This finding is part of the broader financial statement close process, with specific implications for the management of grant funds. It is essential to ensure that all unspent or unearned grant funds are properly tracked and returned when necessary. The failure to do so exposes the organization to financial, legal, and reputational risks that could affect its ability to secure future grants or maintain compliance with current grant conditions. Recommendation: It is recommended that the organization implement a formalized process for tracking unspent and unearned grant funds. This process should include regularly reviewing grant agreements to ensure compliance with return provisions, setting up a system to track fund usage by grant, and identifying any unspent or unearned funds that need to be returned. The organization should assign responsibility for monitoring grant balances and ensure that regular reconciliations between general ledgers and grant tracking systems are performed. Management should also implement stronger oversight and internal controls to ensure that grant funds are tracked accurately, with designated staff ensuring compliance with all grant terms, including timely reporting and returning of unspent funds. Additionally, staff responsible for managing grants should receive training on proper tracking procedures, and a clear process should be developed for returning any unspent or unearned funds to the grant provider. Views of Responsible Officials: The responsible officials acknowledge the audit finding and agree that the failure to track unspent and unearned grant funds properly resulted in funds that should have been returned to the grant provider not being reported or remitted as required. They recognize the importance of adhering to grant terms and ensuring that unspent or unearned funds are properly monitored. The organization is committed to addressing this deficiency by establishing a formalized and centralized system for tracking all grant funds, including unspent or unearned amounts. The officials plan to implement a clear process for regularly reviewing grant status and ensuring compliance with all return provisions. They also recognize the need for improved internal controls and oversight to prevent similar issues in the future. Management is committed to enhancing its processes and will provide the necessary training to staff to ensure that these procedures are followed correctly moving forward.

Corrective Action Plan

The Director of Finance created a new tracking spreadsheet to complete each month during the month-end process. This spreadsheet shows the monthly expenses for each grant and the total for the year. This allows us to monitor the grant funds closely. The information is shared with the board of directors in their financial statement reports

About Reporting →

FY 2023-06-30

FAC accepted this audit on July 30, 2024 — management decision was due January 30, 2025.

2023-005
Reporting

During the audit, Form CF-MH 1037 Reconciliation Report for the fiscal year ending on June 30, 2023, was not timely available. It was noted that the form had not yet been sent to the grantor agency by the deadline of December 31, 2023. Cause: Recent turnover in finance personnel within the Organization and an inadequate control system in place prevented the Organization from accurately tracking and reporting grant expenditures in a timely manner. The Organization is also having a single audit for the first time and did not have all control systems in place before the reporting deadline. Effect: The Organization was listed as non-compliant on the grant confirmation as the required reports were not submitted before the deadline. Late filings of reports may jeopardize the organization's eligibility for future funding, potentially impacting its ability to fulfill its mission and objectives. Questioned Costs: None noted. Context: The organization failed to submit required reports within the timeframe outlined in the grant agreement, resulting in non-compliance with the grant. Repeat Finding from Prior Year: No Recommendation: We recommend implementing a comprehensive framework for monitoring grant compliance, including clear procedures and responsibilities for tracking reporting deadlines and ensuring timely submissions. Views of Responsible Officials: Management is in agreement and will implement procedures to meet reporting deadlines.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Criteria: 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles and Audit Requirements for Fede December 31, 2023.ral Awards require compliance with federal and state contracts. The Organization’s standard SAMH service provider contract, Big Bend Community Based Care, Inc. d/b/a NWF Health Network, required the Form CF-MH 1037 to be submitted by December 31, 2023. Condition: During the audit, Form CF-MH 1037 Reconciliation Report for the fiscal year ending on June 30, 2023, was not timely available. It was noted that the form had not yet been sent to the grantor agency by the deadline of December 31, 2023. Cause: Recent turnover in finance personnel within the Organization and an inadequate control system in place prevented the Organization from accurately tracking and reporting grant expenditures in a timely manner. The Organization is also having a single audit for the first time and did not have all control systems in place before the reporting deadline. Effect: The Organization was listed as non-compliant on the grant confirmation as the required reports were not submitted before the deadline. Late filings of reports may jeopardize the organization's eligibility for future funding, potentially impacting its ability to fulfill its mission and objectives. Questioned Costs: None noted. Context: The organization failed to submit required reports within the timeframe outlined in the grant agreement, resulting in non-compliance with the grant. Repeat Finding from Prior Year: No Recommendation: We recommend implementing a comprehensive framework for monitoring grant compliance, including clear procedures and responsibilities for tracking reporting deadlines and ensuring timely submissions. Views of Responsible Officials: Management is in agreement and will implement procedures to meet reporting deadlines.

Corrective Action Plan

Procedures have been established to run program financial statements to monitor spending monthly. Form 1037 is being added to the comprehensive year-end checklist to ensure that the reports are completed in time.

About Reporting →
2023-006
Reporting

The audit and data collection form and reporting packages were not submitted to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse before the deadline. Cause: The Organization did not submit their data collection form and reporting package to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse by March 31, 2024. Effect: The Organization’s audit was not complete until June 2024 due to recent turnover in the Organization’s finance department resulting in accounts not being reconciled timely. Questioned Costs: None noted Context: The Organization’s fiscal year end is June 30, 2023, therefore making their filing deadline to submit their audit to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse the earlier of 30 calendar dates after receipt of the auditor’s report or March 31, 2024. Due to recent turnover with the Organization’s finance department resulting in accounts not being reconciled timely, the Organization’s audit was not completed until June 2024 resulting in a late filing with the Federal Audit Clearinghouse. Repeat Finding from the Prior Year: No Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization review its processes and procedures to ensure timely closing of the annual financial records, allowing for a timely audit and the timely submission of the data collection form and reporting package to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse. Views of Responsible Officials: Management is in agreement and will implement procedures to meet reporting deadlines.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Criteria: 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards require an audit be completed and the data collection form and reporting package must be submitted within the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditor's report(s), or nine months after the end of the audit period. Condition: The audit and data collection form and reporting packages were not submitted to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse before the deadline. Cause: The Organization did not submit their data collection form and reporting package to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse by March 31, 2024. Effect: The Organization’s audit was not complete until June 2024 due to recent turnover in the Organization’s finance department resulting in accounts not being reconciled timely. Questioned Costs: None noted Context: The Organization’s fiscal year end is June 30, 2023, therefore making their filing deadline to submit their audit to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse the earlier of 30 calendar dates after receipt of the auditor’s report or March 31, 2024. Due to recent turnover with the Organization’s finance department resulting in accounts not being reconciled timely, the Organization’s audit was not completed until June 2024 resulting in a late filing with the Federal Audit Clearinghouse. Repeat Finding from the Prior Year: No Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization review its processes and procedures to ensure timely closing of the annual financial records, allowing for a timely audit and the timely submission of the data collection form and reporting package to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse. Views of Responsible Officials: Management is in agreement and will implement procedures to meet reporting deadlines.

Corrective Action Plan

Month-end and Year-end processes are being updated and streamlined to ensure timely closing. We have requested to be added to the auditor’s schedule earlier this year. Many of the reports required for a single audit are now established and can easily be completed for the next audit.

About Reporting →

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and compliance status.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.