Forsyth County Board of Education

EIN: 586000243

UEI: DBPSHJAXNPJ5

Data as of August 25, 2026

Forsyth County Board of Education10 audit years1 findings
10
Audit Years
1
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings

FY 2024-06-30

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on March 6, 2025. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by September 6, 2025 (354 days ago).

What is a management decision? →
2024-002
Cost Allowability
QUESTIONED COSTS

During our audit, we reviewed a sample of timesheets for employees whose salaries were charged to the grant award. We found that in one instance, an employee was paid $2,165 for a period of time in which the employee no longer worked for the School District. We found in another instance that an employee’s timesheet was missing the required supervisor’s signature, indicating that no formal review or approval process was documented. This employee was paid $1,128 for time during which no work was performed for the School District. Cause: Insufficient internal controls to ensure compliance with both timekeeping policies and employee termination policies. Effects: Without proper supervisory review and signature, there is an increased risk that salaries and wages charged to the federal award may not be accurately allocated to the correct activities and that time reported may not reflect actual work performed. Additionally, deficiencies in internal control surrounding the employee termination process can result in payments to individuals who no longer work for the School District. Questioned Costs: Known questioned costs, based on the results of our audit procedures, amounted to $3,293. When projecting these known questioned costs to the total population of payroll costs charged to the grant in the amount of $7,445,417, likely questioned costs amount to $40,520. Recommendation: We recommend the School District ensure that all supervisors are trained on the importance of reviewing and signing timesheets to comply with federal requirements. We also recommend that the School District evaluate the root cause of the erroneous payment to an employee who had resigned to ensure that controls surrounding employee resignations and terminations are adequate. Auditee’s Response: We concur with the finding and recommendations.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Criteria: According to 2 CFR §200.430, charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Specifically, the Uniform Guidance states that: • Records must reflect an after-the-fact review of the actual activity of each employee, • The review must be documented by the employee or responsible supervisor, • The documentation must account for the total activity for which employees are compensated, and • This documentation must be signed by the employee or supervisor. Condition: During our audit, we reviewed a sample of timesheets for employees whose salaries were charged to the grant award. We found that in one instance, an employee was paid $2,165 for a period of time in which the employee no longer worked for the School District. We found in another instance that an employee’s timesheet was missing the required supervisor’s signature, indicating that no formal review or approval process was documented. This employee was paid $1,128 for time during which no work was performed for the School District. Cause: Insufficient internal controls to ensure compliance with both timekeeping policies and employee termination policies. Effects: Without proper supervisory review and signature, there is an increased risk that salaries and wages charged to the federal award may not be accurately allocated to the correct activities and that time reported may not reflect actual work performed. Additionally, deficiencies in internal control surrounding the employee termination process can result in payments to individuals who no longer work for the School District. Questioned Costs: Known questioned costs, based on the results of our audit procedures, amounted to $3,293. When projecting these known questioned costs to the total population of payroll costs charged to the grant in the amount of $7,445,417, likely questioned costs amount to $40,520. Recommendation: We recommend the School District ensure that all supervisors are trained on the importance of reviewing and signing timesheets to comply with federal requirements. We also recommend that the School District evaluate the root cause of the erroneous payment to an employee who had resigned to ensure that controls surrounding employee resignations and terminations are adequate. Auditee’s Response: We concur with the finding and recommendations.

Corrective Action Plan

Name of Contact Person Responsible for the Corrective Action Plan: Larry Hammel, CFO Changes will be made to the standard operating procedure (SOP). To ensure that timesheets are completed correctly, signed, and reviewed prior to submission for payment. In addition, the principal for each school will be responsible for onboarding/resignation/transfer for all employees at the school location and reporting to Human Resources to process. The training for the new SOP will be completed by April 2025.

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and compliance status.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.