EIN: 582212203
UEI: L9UNSKC1E3Q3
Data as of August 24, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on September 24, 2024. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by March 24, 2025 (518 days ago).
What is a management decision? →The Organization lacked supporting documentation for non‐payroll expenses. Due to lack of supporting documentation and evidence of approval for payment could not be verified. Of the sixty (60) transactions examined, twelve (12) lacked supporting documentation for review, and approval for payment by a Manager. Effect: Management possibly did not expend funds in accordance with the approved detailed lineitem budget and grant agreement and possibly expended funds which did not contribute to the objective set forth for the program. (lack of approved invoices, lack of supporting documentation). Cause: Expenses including approved invoices and/or supporting documentation were not properly maintained in part due to several changes in personnel within the accounting area and overall limited number of personnel for certain functions and lack of board oversight. Questioned Costs: Known questioned costs of $3,931 and likely questioned costs of $17,477 for Healthy Start. Recommendation: We recommend that internal controls be strengthened and processes implemented to ensure all expenses include supporting documentation/invoice indicating nature of expense, amount, authorization and approval for payment.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Federal Program Information: Funding Agency: U.S Department of Health and Human Services FALN: 93.926 Federal Award Identification Number: H49MC00119‐19‐00 Pass Through Entity: State of Georgia Department of Human Services Award Year: 2018‐2020 Criteria: Under 2 CFR Section 200.303(a), non‐federal entities must establish and maintain effective internal controls to provide reasonable assurance that the entity is managing the federal awards in compliance with statues, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Additionally, regulations require that in order for activities and costs to be allowed under Federal awards, 45CFR, part 75 all costs must be adequately documented. Condition: The Organization lacked supporting documentation for non‐payroll expenses. Due to lack of supporting documentation and evidence of approval for payment could not be verified. Of the sixty (60) transactions examined, twelve (12) lacked supporting documentation for review, and approval for payment by a Manager. Effect: Management possibly did not expend funds in accordance with the approved detailed lineitem budget and grant agreement and possibly expended funds which did not contribute to the objective set forth for the program. (lack of approved invoices, lack of supporting documentation). Cause: Expenses including approved invoices and/or supporting documentation were not properly maintained in part due to several changes in personnel within the accounting area and overall limited number of personnel for certain functions and lack of board oversight. Questioned Costs: Known questioned costs of $3,931 and likely questioned costs of $17,477 for Healthy Start. Recommendation: We recommend that internal controls be strengthened and processes implemented to ensure all expenses include supporting documentation/invoice indicating nature of expense, amount, authorization and approval for payment.
We concur with this finding and have implemented measures to mitigate the repetition or additional occurrences. In 2020, we implemented an electronic system to more efficiently collect and store expenditures and supporting documentation, eliminating a paper filing system. We updated our fiscal policies and procedures in 2022 to document a standardized process for documenting expenditures and retaining receipts. For instance, invoices cannot be processed without adequate documentation. Additionally, credit card holders are responsible for submitting electronic credit card receipts to the fiscal office monthly. In 2022, an updated credit card policy was provided to all employees. The adherence to the credit card policy is monitored by the Fiscal Office and CEO. Responsible person(s): Jemea Dorsey, CEO and Jeanetta Johnson, Fiscal Manager Anticipated Completion Date: FY 2022
2019-008
We noted no evidence of review and approval of payroll expenses including time sheets, payroll registers, and payroll reconciliations. Of the forty (40) employees tested, twenty three (23) employees lacked approval by management. Effect: Management possibly did not expend funds in accordance with the approved detailed lineitem budget and grant agreement and possibly expended funds which did not contribute to the objective set forth for the program or correct period of performance (lack of approved time sheets, payroll registers and reconciliations). Cause: Payroll expenses lacked approved timesheets, approved payroll registers and approved reconciliations between budgeted payroll expenses per grant agreement and internal payroll reports. This was due in part due to several changes in personnel within the accounting area and overall limited number of personnel for certain functions and lack of board oversight. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation: We recommend that internal controls be strengthened and processes implemented to ensure all payroll expenses include evidence of review and approval for payment.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Federal Program Information: Funding Agency: U.S Department of Health and Human Services FALN: 93.926 Federal Award Identification Number: H49MC00119‐19‐00 Pass Through Entity: State of Georgia Department of Human Services Award Year: 2018‐2020 Criteria: Under 2 CFR Section 200.303(a), non‐federal entities must establish and maintain effective internal controls to provide reasonable assurance that the entity is managing the federal awards in compliance with statues, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Additionally, regulations require that in order for activities and costs to be allowed under Federal awards, 45CFR, part 75 all costs must be adequately documented. Condition: We noted no evidence of review and approval of payroll expenses including time sheets, payroll registers, and payroll reconciliations. Of the forty (40) employees tested, twenty three (23) employees lacked approval by management. Effect: Management possibly did not expend funds in accordance with the approved detailed lineitem budget and grant agreement and possibly expended funds which did not contribute to the objective set forth for the program or correct period of performance (lack of approved time sheets, payroll registers and reconciliations). Cause: Payroll expenses lacked approved timesheets, approved payroll registers and approved reconciliations between budgeted payroll expenses per grant agreement and internal payroll reports. This was due in part due to several changes in personnel within the accounting area and overall limited number of personnel for certain functions and lack of board oversight. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation: We recommend that internal controls be strengthened and processes implemented to ensure all payroll expenses include evidence of review and approval for payment.
We concur with this finding and have implemented measures to mitigate the repetition or additional occurrences. In 2020, we implemented additional procedures to more efficiently review payroll and supporting documentation. We updated our fiscal policies and procedures in 2022 to document a standardized process for review of payroll. Payroll cannot be processed without adequate review and documentation. Payroll is monitored by the Fiscal Office and CEO. Responsible person(s): Jemea Dorsey, CEO and Jeanetta Johnson, Fiscal Manager Anticipated Completion Date: FY 2022
2019-009
The Organization lacked supporting documentation for non‐payroll expenses. Due to lack of supporting documentation, period of performance could not be verified. Of the sixty (60) nonpayroll transactions examined, ten (10) lacked supporting documentation for review, and 1 expense was for services performed in a prior period. Effect: Management possibly did not expend funds in accordance with the approved detailed lineitem budget and grant agreement and possibly expended funds in the incorrect period of performance. Cause: Expenses including approved invoices and/or supporting documentation were not properly maintained in part due to several changes in personnel within the accounting area and overall limited number of personnel for certain functions and lack of board oversight. Questioned costs: Known questioned costs of $7,674 and likely questioned costs of $34,117 for Healthy Start. Recommendation: We recommend that internal controls be strengthened and processes implemented to ensure all expenses include supporting documentation/invoice indicating period of performance.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Federal Program Information: Funding Agency: U.S Department of Health and Human Services FALN: 93.926 Federal Award Identification Number: H49MC00119‐19‐00 Pass Through Entity: State of Georgia Department of Human Services Award Year: 2018‐2020 Criteria: Under 2 CFR Section 200.303(a), non‐federal entities must establish and maintain effective internal controls to provide reasonable assurance that the entity is managing the federal awards in compliance with statues, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Additionally, under 2 CFR sections 200.308 200.309 and 200.403(h)), the Organization may charge only allowable costs incurred during the approved budget period of a federal award’s period of performance and any costs incurred before the federal awarding agency or pass‐through entity made the federal award that were authorized by the federal awarding agency or pass‐through entity. Condition: The Organization lacked supporting documentation for non‐payroll expenses. Due to lack of supporting documentation, period of performance could not be verified. Of the sixty (60) nonpayroll transactions examined, ten (10) lacked supporting documentation for review, and 1 expense was for services performed in a prior period. Effect: Management possibly did not expend funds in accordance with the approved detailed lineitem budget and grant agreement and possibly expended funds in the incorrect period of performance. Cause: Expenses including approved invoices and/or supporting documentation were not properly maintained in part due to several changes in personnel within the accounting area and overall limited number of personnel for certain functions and lack of board oversight. Questioned costs: Known questioned costs of $7,674 and likely questioned costs of $34,117 for Healthy Start. Recommendation: We recommend that internal controls be strengthened and processes implemented to ensure all expenses include supporting documentation/invoice indicating period of performance.
We concur with this finding and have implemented measures to mitigate the repetition or additional occurrences. In 2020, we implemented an electronic system to more efficiently collect and store expenditures and supporting documentation, eliminating a paper filing system. We updated our fiscal policies and procedures in 2022 to document a standardized process for documenting expenditures and retaining receipts. For instance, invoices cannot be processed without adequate documentation. Additionally, credit card holders are responsible for submitting electronic credit card receipts to the fiscal office monthly. In 2022, an updated credit card policy was provided to all employees. The adherence to the credit card policy is monitored by the Fiscal Office and CEO. Responsible person(s): Jemea Dorsey, CEO and Jeanetta Johnson, Fiscal Manager Anticipated Completion Date: FY 2022
2019-010
The Organization has a policy which in includes thee Fiscal/Grant Manager and/or the CEO review all drawdown requests to ensure costs are paid before reimbursement is requested. However of the seventeen (17) drawdown requests that we tested, there was no evidence of review and approval for payment. Effect: Management possibly did not expend funds in accordance with the federal award due to lack of evidence of oversight/review of drawdowns and after reimbursable expenses have been incurred. Cause: Management did not document evidence of review and approval of drawdown requests. This was due in part to lack of oversight. Also there were several changes in personnel within the accounting area and overall limited number of personnel for certain functions and lack of board oversight. Questioned costs: None Recommendation: We recommend that internal controls be strengthened and processes implemented to ensure all draw down requests are reviewed and approved to ensure costs were accurately reported and paid before requesting reimbursement.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Federal Program Information: Funding Agency: U.S Department of Health and Human Services FALN: 93.926 Federal Award Identification Number: H49MC00119‐19‐00 Pass Through Entity: State of Georgia Department of Human Services Award Year: 2018‐2020 Criteria: Under 2 CFR Section 200.303(a), non‐federal entities must establish and maintain effective internal controls to provide reasonable assurance that the entity is managing the federal awards in compliance with statues, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Additionally regulations require the reimbursement payment method may be used on a Federal award for activities as specified in 2 CFR section 200.305(b)(3), program costs must be paid by non‐ Federal entity funds before submitting a payment request (2 CFR section 200.305(b)(3)), i.e., the non‐ Federal entity must disburse funds for program purposes before requesting payment from the Federal awarding agency or pass‐through entity. Condition: The Organization has a policy which in includes thee Fiscal/Grant Manager and/or the CEO review all drawdown requests to ensure costs are paid before reimbursement is requested. However of the seventeen (17) drawdown requests that we tested, there was no evidence of review and approval for payment. Effect: Management possibly did not expend funds in accordance with the federal award due to lack of evidence of oversight/review of drawdowns and after reimbursable expenses have been incurred. Cause: Management did not document evidence of review and approval of drawdown requests. This was due in part to lack of oversight. Also there were several changes in personnel within the accounting area and overall limited number of personnel for certain functions and lack of board oversight. Questioned costs: None Recommendation: We recommend that internal controls be strengthened and processes implemented to ensure all draw down requests are reviewed and approved to ensure costs were accurately reported and paid before requesting reimbursement.
We concur with this finding and have implemented measures to mitigate the repetition or additional occurrences. In 2023, we implemented additional procedures to more efficiently review drawdowns and supporting documentation. We updated our fiscal policies and procedures in 2023 to document a standardized process for review and approval of drawdowns before request for reimbursement by the Fiscal Office and CEO. Responsible person(s): Jemea Dorsey, CEO and Jeanetta Johnson, Fiscal Manager Anticipated Completion Date: FY 2022
2019-011
The Organization does have approved policies and procedures over procurement that meet the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. However the Organization is not following its prescribed policies and procedures. The Organization lacked supporting documentation verifying procurement policies and procedures were followed. Due to lack of supporting documentation, procurement could not be verified. Of the sixty (60) transactions examined, ten (10) lacked supporting documentation for review of procurement. Effect: Not following procurement policies and procedures may result in funds to be returned back to grantor and/or impact future funding. Cause: Supporting procurement documentation for acquisition of property and services were not properly maintained in part due to several changes in personnel within the accounting area and overall limited number of personnel for certain functions and lack of board oversight. Questioned Costs: Known questioned costs of $3,870 and likely questioned costs of $17,206 for Healthy Start. Recommendation: We recommend the Organization strengthen its policies and procedures to ensure procurement is adequately documented for that goods and services purchased in accordance with Uniform Guidance and other federal guidelines.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Federal Program Information: Funding Agency: U.S Department of Health and Human Services FALN: 93.926 Federal Award Identification Number: H49MC00119‐19‐00 Pass Through Entity: State of Georgia Department of Human Services Award Year: 2018‐:2020 Criteria: Under 2 CFR Section 200.303(a), non‐federal entities must establish and maintain effective internal controls to provide reasonable assurance that the entity is managing the federal awards in compliance with statues, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Additionally, under 2 CFR Section 200.320, the Organization must have and use documented procurement procedures for acquisition of property and services under a federal award or a sub‐award. Condition: The Organization does have approved policies and procedures over procurement that meet the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. However the Organization is not following its prescribed policies and procedures. The Organization lacked supporting documentation verifying procurement policies and procedures were followed. Due to lack of supporting documentation, procurement could not be verified. Of the sixty (60) transactions examined, ten (10) lacked supporting documentation for review of procurement. Effect: Not following procurement policies and procedures may result in funds to be returned back to grantor and/or impact future funding. Cause: Supporting procurement documentation for acquisition of property and services were not properly maintained in part due to several changes in personnel within the accounting area and overall limited number of personnel for certain functions and lack of board oversight. Questioned Costs: Known questioned costs of $3,870 and likely questioned costs of $17,206 for Healthy Start. Recommendation: We recommend the Organization strengthen its policies and procedures to ensure procurement is adequately documented for that goods and services purchased in accordance with Uniform Guidance and other federal guidelines.
We concur with this finding and have implemented measures to mitigate the repetition or additional occurrences. In 2020, we implemented an electronic system to more efficiently collect and store expenditures and supporting documentation, eliminating a paper filing system. We updated our fiscal policies and procedures in 2022 to include procurement and implemented a procedure for ensuring compliance with obtaining required bids, etc. Responsible person(s): Jemea Dorsey, CEO and Jeanetta Johnson, Fiscal Manager Anticipated Completion Date: FY 2022
2019-012
Under 2 CFR part 180, the Organization is required to verify suspension or debarment from the excluded parties list system regarding compliance. Though the Organization did not have a policy for suspension and debarment, the Organization complied with the requirements. Effect: Not having a suspension and debarment policy may result in funds to be returned back to grantor and/or impact future funding. Cause: Supporting suspension and debarment documentation for acquisition of property and services were not properly established in part due to several changes in personnel within the accounting area and overall limited number of personnel for certain functions and lack of board oversight. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation: We recommend the Organization strengthen its policies and procedures to ensure procurement and suspension and debarment is adequately documented for that goods and services purchased in accordance with Uniform Guidance and other federal guidelines. In addition, the Organization should verify that all vendors under covered transactions are not listed on the excluded parties list system by performing a search on sam.gov and maintaining the results of such search in the vendor’s file.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Federal Program Information: Funding Agency: U.S Department of Health and Human Services FALN: 93.926 Federal Award Identification Number: H49MC00119‐19‐00 Pass Through Entity: State of Georgia Department of Human Services Award Year: 2018‐2020 Criteria: Under 2 CFR Section 200.303(a), non‐federal entities must establish and maintain effective internal controls to provide reasonable assurance that the entity is managing the federal awards in compliance with statues, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Under 2 CFR part 180, the Organization is required to verify suspension or debarment from the excluded parties list system regarding compliance. Condition: Under 2 CFR part 180, the Organization is required to verify suspension or debarment from the excluded parties list system regarding compliance. Though the Organization did not have a policy for suspension and debarment, the Organization complied with the requirements. Effect: Not having a suspension and debarment policy may result in funds to be returned back to grantor and/or impact future funding. Cause: Supporting suspension and debarment documentation for acquisition of property and services were not properly established in part due to several changes in personnel within the accounting area and overall limited number of personnel for certain functions and lack of board oversight. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation: We recommend the Organization strengthen its policies and procedures to ensure procurement and suspension and debarment is adequately documented for that goods and services purchased in accordance with Uniform Guidance and other federal guidelines. In addition, the Organization should verify that all vendors under covered transactions are not listed on the excluded parties list system by performing a search on sam.gov and maintaining the results of such search in the vendor’s file.
We concur with this finding and have implemented measures to mitigate the repetition or additional occurrences. In 2020, we implemented an electronic system to more efficiently collect and store expenditures and supporting documentation, eliminating a paper filing system. We updated our fiscal policies and procedures in 2022 to include procurement, suspension and debarment procedures and implemented a procedure for ensuring compliance with obtaining required bids, etc. Responsible person(s): Jemea Dorsey, CEO and Jeanetta Johnson, Fiscal Manager Anticipated Completion Date: FY 2022
2019-012
The Organization has a policy which includes the Fiscal/Grant Manager and/or the CEO review all drawdown requests to ensure costs are paid before reimbursement is requested. However of the twenty-one (21) drawdown requests that we tested, there was no evidence of review and approval for drawdown. Effect: Management possibly did not expend funds in accordance with the federal award due to lack of evidence of oversight/review of drawdowns and after reimbursable expenses have been incurred. Cause: Management did not document evidence of review and approval of drawdown requests. This was due in part to lack of oversight. Also there were several changes in personnel within the accounting area and overall limited number of personnel for certain functions and lack of board oversight. Questioned costs: None Recommendation: We recommend that internal controls be strengthened and processes implemented to ensure all draw down requests are reviewed and approved to ensure costs were accurately reported and paid before requesting reimbursement.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Criteria: Under 2 CFR Section 200.303(a), non-federal entities must establish and maintain effective internal controls to provide reasonable assurance that the entity is managing the federal awards in compliance with statues, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Additionally regulations require the reimbursement payment method may be used on a Federal award for activities as specified in 2 CFR section 200.305(b)(3), program costs must be paid by non-Federal entity funds before submitting a payment request (2 CFR section 200.305(b)(3)), i.e., the non-Federal entity must disburse funds for program purposes before requesting payment from the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity. Condition: The Organization has a policy which includes the Fiscal/Grant Manager and/or the CEO review all drawdown requests to ensure costs are paid before reimbursement is requested. However of the twenty-one (21) drawdown requests that we tested, there was no evidence of review and approval for drawdown. Effect: Management possibly did not expend funds in accordance with the federal award due to lack of evidence of oversight/review of drawdowns and after reimbursable expenses have been incurred. Cause: Management did not document evidence of review and approval of drawdown requests. This was due in part to lack of oversight. Also there were several changes in personnel within the accounting area and overall limited number of personnel for certain functions and lack of board oversight. Questioned costs: None Recommendation: We recommend that internal controls be strengthened and processes implemented to ensure all draw down requests are reviewed and approved to ensure costs were accurately reported and paid before requesting reimbursement.
Recommendation: We recommend that internal controls be strengthened and processes implemented to ensure all draw down requests are reviewed and approved to ensure costs were accurately reported and paid before requesting reimbursement. Grantee Response and Corrective Action Plan 2023-001: We concur with this finding and have implemented measures to mitigate the repetition or additional occurrences. Previously draw down documentation was uploaded to a shared folder, in which the CEO and Fiscal Manager had access. In 2024, we implemented additional procedures to document review of drawdowns and supporting documentation. Additionally, documentation includes attaining the CEO signature on draw down documentation before the draw down is made. Responsible Parties: Jemea Dorsey, CEO Date Corrected: April 30, 2024
2022-007
Under 2 CFR part 180, the Organization is required to verify suspension or debarment from the excluded parties list system regarding compliance. Though the Organization did not have a policy for suspension and debarment, the Organization complied with the requirements. Effect: Not having a suspension and debarment policy may result in funds to be returned back to grantor and/or impact future funding. Cause: Supporting suspension and debarment documentation for the acquisition of property and services were not properly established in part due to several changes in personnel within the accounting area and overall limited number of personnel for certain functions and lack of board oversight. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation: We recommend the Organization strengthen its policies and procedures to ensure suspension and debarment is adequately documented that goods and services purchased in accordance with Uniform Guidance and other federal guidelines. In addition, the Organization should verify that all vendors under covered transactions are not listed on the excluded parties list system by performing a search on sam.gov and maintaining the results of such search in the vendor’s file.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Criteria: Under 2 CFR Section 200.303(a), non‐federal entities must establish and maintain effective internal controls to provide reasonable assurance that the entity is managing the federal awards in compliance with statues, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition: Under 2 CFR part 180, the Organization is required to verify suspension or debarment from the excluded parties list system regarding compliance. Though the Organization did not have a policy for suspension and debarment, the Organization complied with the requirements. Effect: Not having a suspension and debarment policy may result in funds to be returned back to grantor and/or impact future funding. Cause: Supporting suspension and debarment documentation for the acquisition of property and services were not properly established in part due to several changes in personnel within the accounting area and overall limited number of personnel for certain functions and lack of board oversight. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation: We recommend the Organization strengthen its policies and procedures to ensure suspension and debarment is adequately documented that goods and services purchased in accordance with Uniform Guidance and other federal guidelines. In addition, the Organization should verify that all vendors under covered transactions are not listed on the excluded parties list system by performing a search on sam.gov and maintaining the results of such search in the vendor’s file.
Recommendation: We recommend the Organization strengthen its policies and procedures to ensure procurement and suspension and debarment is adequately documented for that goods and services purchased in accordance with Uniform Guidance and other federal guidelines. In addition, the Organization should verify that all vendors under covered transactions are not listed on the excluded parties list system by performing a search on sam.gov and maintaining the results of such search in the vendor’s file. Grantee Response and Corrective Action Plan 2023-002: In response to the audit finding under 2 CFR part 180 regarding the necessity to verify suspension or debarment status in compliance with the excluded parties list system, it is acknowledged that while the Center for Black Women’s Wellness did not previously have a formal policy specifically addressing suspension and debarment, our practices have nonetheless complied with the requirements. Recognizing the importance of formalizing these practices into policy, we are committed to developing and implementing a comprehensive policy that explicitly addresses these checks. This initiative will be integrated with our existing compliance frameworks to ensure consistent adherence across all procurement activities. In line with our recent enhancements in internal controls, including the engagement of a Contractual CFO in 2024, this policy will reinforce our ongoing efforts to uphold the highest standards of compliance and accountability in all our operations. Responsible Parties: Jemea Dorsey, CEO Date Corrected: April 30, 2024
2022-009
FAC accepted this audit on April 16, 2024 — management decision was due October 16, 2024.
The Organization lacked supporting documentation for certain non-payroll expenses and lacked evidence of review for certain non-payroll expenses. Due to the lack of supporting documentation or evidence of approval for payment, certain expenses could not be verified. Of the sixty (60) transactions examined eight (8) lacked supporting documentation and twenty five (25) lacked evidence of review, and approval for payment. Effect: Management possibly did not expend funds in accordance with the approved detailed line-item budget and grant agreement and possibly expended funds which did not contribute to the objective set forth for the program (lack of approved invoices, lack of supporting documentation). Cause: Expenses including approved invoices and/or supporting documentation were not properly maintained in part due to several changes in personnel within the accounting area and overall limited number of personnel for certain functions and lack of board oversight. Questioned Costs: Known questioned costs of $980 and likely questioned costs of $5,791 for Healthy Start. Recommendation: We recommend that internal controls be strengthened and processes implemented to ensure all expenses include supporting documentation/invoice indicating nature of expense, amount, authorization and approval for payment.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴2022-005 – Non Payroll Expenses- Material Weakness – Originated in 2019 Federal Program Information: Funding Agency: U.S Department of Health and Human Services FALN: 93.926 Federal Award Identification Number: H49MC00119-22-00 Pass Through Entity: State of Georgia Department of Human Services Award Year: 2020-2024 Criteria: Under 2 CFR Section 200.303(a), non-federal entities must establish and maintain effective internal controls to provide reasonable assurance that the entity is managing the federal awards in compliance with statues, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Additionally, regulations require that in order for activities and costs to be allowed under Federal awards, 45 CFR, part 75 all costs must be adequately documented. Condition: The Organization lacked supporting documentation for certain non-payroll expenses and lacked evidence of review for certain non-payroll expenses. Due to the lack of supporting documentation or evidence of approval for payment, certain expenses could not be verified. Of the sixty (60) transactions examined eight (8) lacked supporting documentation and twenty five (25) lacked evidence of review, and approval for payment. Effect: Management possibly did not expend funds in accordance with the approved detailed line-item budget and grant agreement and possibly expended funds which did not contribute to the objective set forth for the program (lack of approved invoices, lack of supporting documentation). Cause: Expenses including approved invoices and/or supporting documentation were not properly maintained in part due to several changes in personnel within the accounting area and overall limited number of personnel for certain functions and lack of board oversight. Questioned Costs: Known questioned costs of $980 and likely questioned costs of $5,791 for Healthy Start. Recommendation: We recommend that internal controls be strengthened and processes implemented to ensure all expenses include supporting documentation/invoice indicating nature of expense, amount, authorization and approval for payment.
U.S Department of Health and Human Services FALN: 93.926 Federal Award Identification Number: 5 H49MC00119-21-00 / 6 H49MC00119-20-01 2022-005 – Non Payroll Expenses- Material Weakness Recommendation: We recommend that internal controls be strengthened and processes implemented to ensure all expenses include supporting documentation/invoice indicating nature of expense, amount, authorization and approval for payment. Grantee Response and Corrective Action Plan 2022-005: The CEO has always reviewed the credit card statement monthly for discrepancies and allowable costs. Additionally, credit card holders are responsible for reviewing their credit card statements monthly for discrepancies and allowable costs. The Center for Black Women's Wellness has proactively updated our credit card policy in 2022, which is now signed by all employees, to reinforce the policy that receipts must be submitted to cardholder within 24 hours. This measure aligns with our broader fiscal management improvements, which also involve the engagement of a Contractual CFO in April 2024 to oversee and refine our financial operations. These initiatives are part of our commitment to maintaining rigorous financial integrity and ensuring that all transactions are transparent and compliant with regulatory requirements. Additionally, we have resolved past documentation issues, such as those arising from the abrupt departure of an employee, by implementing robust procedures to avoid similar incidents in the future. Responsible Parties: Jemea Dorsey, CEO Date Corrected: April 30, 2024
2021-007
The Organization lacked supporting documentation for certain non-payroll expenses and lacked evidence of review for certain non-payroll expenses. Due to lack of supporting documentation and evidence of approval for payment, certain transactions could not be verified. Of the sixty (60) transactions examined, eight (8) lacked supporting documentation and twenty five (25) lacked evidence of review, and approval for payment. Effect: Management possibly did not expend funds in accordance with the approved detailed line-item budget and grant agreement and possibly expended funds in the incorrect period of performance. Cause: Expenses including approved invoices and/or supporting documentation were not properly maintained in part due to several changes in personnel within the accounting area and overall limited number of personnel for certain functions and lack of board oversight. Questioned Costs: Known questioned costs of $980 and likely questioned costs of $5,791 for Healthy Start. Recommendation: We recommend that internal controls be strengthened and processes implemented to ensure all expenses include supporting documentation/invoice indicating period of performance.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴2022-006: Period of Performance – Material Weakness – Originated in 2019 Federal Program Information: Funding Agency: U.S Department of Health and Human Services FALN: 93.926 Federal Award Identification Number: H49MC00119-22-00 Pass Through Entity: State of Georgia Department of Human Services Award Year: 2020-2024 Criteria: Under 2 CFR Section 200.303(a), non‐federal entities must establish and maintain effective internal controls to provide reasonable assurance that the entity is managing the federal awards in compliance with statues, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Additionally, under 2 CFR sections 200.308 200.309 and 200.403(h)), the Organization may charge only allowable costs incurred during the approved budget period of a federal award’s period of performance and any costs incurred before the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity made the federal award that were authorized by the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity. Condition: The Organization lacked supporting documentation for certain non-payroll expenses and lacked evidence of review for certain non-payroll expenses. Due to lack of supporting documentation and evidence of approval for payment, certain transactions could not be verified. Of the sixty (60) transactions examined, eight (8) lacked supporting documentation and twenty five (25) lacked evidence of review, and approval for payment. Effect: Management possibly did not expend funds in accordance with the approved detailed line-item budget and grant agreement and possibly expended funds in the incorrect period of performance. Cause: Expenses including approved invoices and/or supporting documentation were not properly maintained in part due to several changes in personnel within the accounting area and overall limited number of personnel for certain functions and lack of board oversight. Questioned Costs: Known questioned costs of $980 and likely questioned costs of $5,791 for Healthy Start. Recommendation: We recommend that internal controls be strengthened and processes implemented to ensure all expenses include supporting documentation/invoice indicating period of performance.
U.S Department of Health and Human Services FALN: 93.926 Federal Award Identification Number: 5 H49MC00119-21-00 / 6 H49MC00119-20-01 2022-006 – Period of Performance – Significant Deficiency Recommendation: We recommend that internal controls be strengthened and processes implemented to ensure all expenses include supporting documentation/invoice indicating period of performance. Grantee Response and Corrective Action Plan 2022-006: The Center for Black Women's Wellness has proactively updated our credit card policy in 2022. The CEO reviews the credit card statement monthly for discrepancies and allowable costs. Additionally, credit card holders are responsible for reviewing their credit card statements monthly for discrepancies and allowable costs. This measure aligns with our broader fiscal management improvements, which also involve the engagement of a Contractual CFO in April 2024 to oversee and refine our financial operations. These initiatives are part of our commitment to maintaining rigorous financial integrity and ensuring that all transactions are transparent and compliant with regulatory requirements. Additionally, we have resolved past documentation issues, such as those arising from the abrupt departure of an employee, by implementing robust procedures to avoid similar incidents in the future. Responsible Parties: Jemea Dorsey, CEO Date Corrected: April 30, 2024
2021-008
The Organization has a policy which includes the Fiscal/Grant Manager and/or the CEO review all drawdown requests to ensure costs are paid before reimbursement is requested. However of the sixteen (16) drawdown requests that we tested, there was no evidence of review and approval for drawdown. Effect: Management possibly did not expend funds in accordance with the federal award due to lack of evidence of oversight/review of drawdowns and after reimbursable expenses have been incurred. Cause: Management did not document evidence of review and approval of drawdown requests. This was due in part to lack of oversight. Also there were several changes in personnel within the accounting area and overall limited number of personnel for certain functions and lack of board oversight. Questioned costs: None Recommendation: We recommend that internal controls be strengthened and processes implemented to ensure all draw down requests are reviewed and approved to ensure costs were accurately reported and paid before requesting reimbursement.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴2022-007: Cash Management - Material Weakness – Originated in 2019 Federal Program Information: Funding Agency: U.S Department of Health and Human Services FALN: 93.926 Federal Award Identification Number: H49MC00119-22-00 Pass Through Entity: State of Georgia Department of Human Services Award Year: 2020-2024 Criteria: Under 2 CFR Section 200.303(a), non-federal entities must establish and maintain effective internal controls to provide reasonable assurance that the entity is managing the federal awards in compliance with statues, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Additionally regulations require the reimbursement payment method may be used on a Federal award for activities as specified in 2 CFR section 200.305(b)(3), program costs must be paid by non-Federal entity funds before submitting a payment request (2 CFR section 200.305(b)(3)), i.e., the non-Federal entity must disburse funds for program purposes before requesting payment from the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity. Condition: The Organization has a policy which includes the Fiscal/Grant Manager and/or the CEO review all drawdown requests to ensure costs are paid before reimbursement is requested. However of the sixteen (16) drawdown requests that we tested, there was no evidence of review and approval for drawdown. Effect: Management possibly did not expend funds in accordance with the federal award due to lack of evidence of oversight/review of drawdowns and after reimbursable expenses have been incurred. Cause: Management did not document evidence of review and approval of drawdown requests. This was due in part to lack of oversight. Also there were several changes in personnel within the accounting area and overall limited number of personnel for certain functions and lack of board oversight. Questioned costs: None Recommendation: We recommend that internal controls be strengthened and processes implemented to ensure all draw down requests are reviewed and approved to ensure costs were accurately reported and paid before requesting reimbursement.
U.S Department of Health and Human Services FALN: 93.926 Federal Award Identification Number: 5 H49MC00119-21-00 / 6 H49MC00119-20-01 2022-007: Cash Management – Material Weakness Recommendation: We recommend that internal controls be strengthened and processes implemented to ensure all draw down requests are reviewed and approved to ensure costs were accurately reported and paid before requesting reimbursement. Grantee Response and Corrective Action Plan 2022-007: We concur with this finding and have implemented measures to mitigate the repetition or additional occurrences. Previously draw down documentation was uploaded to a shared folder, in which the CEO and Fiscal Manager had access. In 2023, we implemented additional procedures to document review of drawdowns and supporting documentation. Additionally, documentation includes attaining the CEO signature on draw down documentation before the draw down is made. Responsible Parties: Jemea Dorsey, CEO Date Corrected: April 30, 2024
2021-009
The Organization does have approved policies and procedures over procurement that meet the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. However, the Organization is not following its prescribed policies and procedures. The Organization lacked supporting documentation verifying procurement policies and procedures were followed. Due to lack of supporting documentation, procurement could not be verified. Of the sixty (60) transactions examined, thirty three (33) lacked supporting documentation for review of procurement. Effect: Not following procurement policies and procedures may result in funds to be returned back to grantor and/or impact future funding. Cause: Supporting procurement documentation for acquisition of property and services were not properly maintained in part due to several changes in personnel within the accounting area and overall limited number of personnel for certain functions and lack of board oversight. Questioned Costs: Known questioned costs of $980 and likely questioned costs of $5,791 for Healthy Start. Recommendation: We recommend the Organization strengthen its policies and procedures to ensure procurement is adequately documented that goods and services are purchased in accordance with Uniform Guidance and other federal guidelines.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴2022-008: Procurement – Material Weakness – Originated in 2019 Federal Program Information: Funding Agency: U.S Department of Health and Human Services FALN: 93.926 Federal Award Identification Number: H49MC00119-22-00 Pass Through Entity: State of Georgia Department of Human Services Award Year: 2020-2024 Criteria: Under 2 CFR Section 200.303(a), non‐federal entities must establish and maintain effective internal controls to provide reasonable assurance that the entity is managing the federal awards in compliance with statues, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Additionally, under 2 CFR Section 200.320, the Organization must have and use documented procurement procedures for acquisition of property and services under a federal award or a sub‐award. Condition: The Organization does have approved policies and procedures over procurement that meet the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. However, the Organization is not following its prescribed policies and procedures. The Organization lacked supporting documentation verifying procurement policies and procedures were followed. Due to lack of supporting documentation, procurement could not be verified. Of the sixty (60) transactions examined, thirty three (33) lacked supporting documentation for review of procurement. Effect: Not following procurement policies and procedures may result in funds to be returned back to grantor and/or impact future funding. Cause: Supporting procurement documentation for acquisition of property and services were not properly maintained in part due to several changes in personnel within the accounting area and overall limited number of personnel for certain functions and lack of board oversight. Questioned Costs: Known questioned costs of $980 and likely questioned costs of $5,791 for Healthy Start. Recommendation: We recommend the Organization strengthen its policies and procedures to ensure procurement is adequately documented that goods and services are purchased in accordance with Uniform Guidance and other federal guidelines.
U.S Department of Health and Human Services FALN: 93.926 Federal Award Identification Number: 5 H49MC00119-21-00 / 6 H49MC00119-20-01 2022-008: Procurement – Material Weakness Recommendation: We recommend the Organization strengthen its policies and procedures to ensure procurement is adequately documented so that goods and services are purchased in accordance with Uniform Guidance and other federal guidelines. Grantee Response and Corrective Action Plan 2022-008: We acknowledge the gap identified between our policy framework and its execution, particularly in the area of maintaining supporting documentation. The Center for Black Women’s Wellness has approved policies that are designed to meet the requirements of the Uniform Guidance; however, we recognize that in practice, implementation has been inconsistent. Notably, of the sixty transactions reviewed, eight were found lacking in supporting documentation. To address this issue, we have already taken corrective measures by reinforcing our procedures and ensuring that appropriate staff are aware of these requirements. In 2024, we strengthened our oversight by engaging a Contractual CFO who will be instrumental in implementing these enhanced controls. This effort is part of our ongoing commitment to ensure full compliance and transparency in our procurement processes, thereby aligning our practices more closely with our established policies. Responsible Parties: Jemea Dorsey, CEO Date Corrected: April 30, 2024
2021-010
Under 2 CFR part 180, the Organization is required to verify suspension or debarment from the excluded parties list system regarding compliance. Though the Organization did not have a policy for suspension and debarment, the Organization complied with the requirements. Effect: Not having a suspension and debarment policy may result in funds to be returned back to grantor and/or impact future funding. Cause: Supporting suspension and debarment documentation for the acquisition of property and services were not properly established in part due to several changes in personnel within the accounting area and overall limited number of personnel for certain functions and lack of board oversight. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation: We recommend the Organization strengthen its policies and procedures to ensure suspension and debarment is adequately documented that goods and services purchased in accordance with Uniform Guidance and other federal guidelines. In addition, the Organization should verify that all vendors under covered transactions are not listed on the excluded parties list system by performing a search on sam.gov and maintaining the results of such search in the vendor’s file.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴2022-009: Suspension and Debarment- Material Weakness – Originated in 2019 Federal Program Information: Funding Agency: U.S Department of Health and Human Services FALN: 93.926 Federal Award Identification Number: H49MC00119-22-00 Pass Through Entity: State of Georgia Department of Human Services Award Year: 2020-2024 Criteria: Under 2 CFR Section 200.303(a), non‐federal entities must establish and maintain effective internal controls to provide reasonable assurance that the entity is managing the federal awards in compliance with statues, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition: Under 2 CFR part 180, the Organization is required to verify suspension or debarment from the excluded parties list system regarding compliance. Though the Organization did not have a policy for suspension and debarment, the Organization complied with the requirements. Effect: Not having a suspension and debarment policy may result in funds to be returned back to grantor and/or impact future funding. Cause: Supporting suspension and debarment documentation for the acquisition of property and services were not properly established in part due to several changes in personnel within the accounting area and overall limited number of personnel for certain functions and lack of board oversight. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation: We recommend the Organization strengthen its policies and procedures to ensure suspension and debarment is adequately documented that goods and services purchased in accordance with Uniform Guidance and other federal guidelines. In addition, the Organization should verify that all vendors under covered transactions are not listed on the excluded parties list system by performing a search on sam.gov and maintaining the results of such search in the vendor’s file.
U.S Department of Health and Human Services FALN: 93.926 Federal Award Identification Number: 5 H49MC00119-21-00 / 6 H49MC00119-20-01 2022-009: Suspension and Debarment- Material Weakness Recommendation: We recommend the Organization strengthen its policies and procedures to ensure suspension and debarment is adequately documented so that goods and services are purchased in accordance with Uniform Guidance and other federal guidelines. In addition, the Organization should verify that all vendors under covered transactions are not listed on the excluded parties list system by performing a search on sam.gov and maintaining the results of such search in the vendor’s file. Grantee Response and Corrective Action Plan 2022-009: In response to the audit finding under 2 CFR part 180 regarding the necessity to verify suspension or debarment status in compliance with the excluded parties list system, it is acknowledged that while the Center for Black Women’s Wellness did not previously have a formal policy specifically addressing suspension and debarment, our practices have nonetheless complied with the requirements. Recognizing the importance of formalizing these practices into policy, we are committed to developing and implementing a comprehensive policy that explicitly addresses these checks. This initiative will be integrated with our existing compliance frameworks to ensure consistent adherence across all procurement activities. In line with our recent enhancements in internal controls, including the engagement of a Contractual CFO in 2024, this policy will reinforce our ongoing efforts to uphold the highest standards of compliance and accountability in all our operations. Responsible Parties: Jemea Dorsey, CEO Date Corrected: April 30, 2024
2021-011
FAC accepted this audit on January 17, 2024 — management decision was due July 17, 2024.
The Organization lacked supporting documentation for non‐payroll expenses. Due to lack of supporting documentation and evidence of approval for payment could not be verified. Of the sixty (60) transactions examined, fourteen (14) lacked supporting documentation for review, and approval for payment by a Manager. Effect: Management possibly did not expend funds in accordance with the approved detailed lineitem budget and grant agreement and possibly expended funds which did not contribute to the objective set forth for the program. (lack of approved invoices, lack of supporting documentation). Cause: Expenses including approved invoices and/or supporting documentation were not properly maintained in part due to several changes in personnel within the accounting area and overall limited number of personnel for certain functions and lack of board oversight. Questioned Costs: Known questioned costs of $2,066 and likely questioned costs of $11,507 for Healthy Start. Recommendation: We recommend that internal controls be strengthened and processes implemented to ensure all expenses include supporting documentation/invoice indicating nature of expense, amount, authorization and approval for payment.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Federal Program Information: Funding Agency: U.S Department of Health and Human Services FALN: 93.926 Federal Award Identification Number: 5 H49MC00119‐21‐00 / 6 H49MC00119‐20‐01 Pass Through Entity: State of Georgia Department of Human Services Award Year: 2020‐2024 Criteria: Under 2 CFR Section 200.303(a), non‐federal entities must establish and maintain effective internal controls to provide reasonable assurance that the entity is managing the federal awards in compliance with statues, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Additionally, regulations require that in order for activities and costs to be allowed under Federal awards, 45CFR, part 75 all costs must be adequately documented. Condition: The Organization lacked supporting documentation for non‐payroll expenses. Due to lack of supporting documentation and evidence of approval for payment could not be verified. Of the sixty (60) transactions examined, fourteen (14) lacked supporting documentation for review, and approval for payment by a Manager. Effect: Management possibly did not expend funds in accordance with the approved detailed lineitem budget and grant agreement and possibly expended funds which did not contribute to the objective set forth for the program. (lack of approved invoices, lack of supporting documentation). Cause: Expenses including approved invoices and/or supporting documentation were not properly maintained in part due to several changes in personnel within the accounting area and overall limited number of personnel for certain functions and lack of board oversight. Questioned Costs: Known questioned costs of $2,066 and likely questioned costs of $11,507 for Healthy Start. Recommendation: We recommend that internal controls be strengthened and processes implemented to ensure all expenses include supporting documentation/invoice indicating nature of expense, amount, authorization and approval for payment.
We concur with this finding and have implemented measures to mitigate the repetition or additional occurrences. We implemented an electronic system to more efficiently collect and store expenditures and supporting documentation, eliminating a paper filing system. We updated our fiscal policies and procedures in 2022 to document a standardized process for documenting expenditures and retaining receipts. For instance, invoices cannot be processed without adequate documentation. Additionally, credit card holders are responsible for submitting electronic credit card receipts to the fiscal office monthly. In 2022, an updated credit card policy was provided to all employees. The adherence to the credit card policy is monitored by the Fiscal Office and CEO. Responsible person(s): Jemea Dorsey, CEO and Jeanetta Johnson, Fiscal Manager Anticipated Completion Date: FY 2022
2020-007
The Organization lacked supporting documentation for non‐payroll expenses. Due to lack of supporting documentation, period of performance could not be verified. Of the sixty (60) nonpayroll transactions examined, fourteen (14) lacked supporting documentation for review. Effect: Management possibly did not expend funds in accordance with the approved detailed lineitem budget and grant agreement and possibly expended funds in the incorrect period of performance. Cause: Expenses including approved invoices and/or supporting documentation were not properly maintained in part due to several changes in personnel within the accounting area and overall limited number of personnel for certain functions and lack of board oversight. Questioned costs: Known questioned costs of $2,066 and likely questioned costs of $11,507 for Healthy Start. Recommendation: We recommend that internal controls be strengthened and processes implemented to ensure all expenses include supporting documentation/invoice indicating period of performance.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Federal Program Information: Funding Agency: U.S Department of Health and Human Services FALN: 93.926 Federal Award Identification Number: 5 H49MC00119‐21‐00 / 6 H49MC00119‐20‐01 Pass Through Entity: State of Georgia Department of Human Services Award Year: 2020‐2024 Criteria: Under 2 CFR Section 200.303(a), non‐federal entities must establish and maintain effective internal controls to provide reasonable assurance that the entity is managing the federal awards in compliance with statues, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Additionally, under 2 CFR sections 200.308 200.309 and 200.403(h)), the Organization may charge only allowable costs incurred during the approved budget period of a federal award’s period of performance and any costs incurred before the federal awarding agency or pass‐through entity made the federal award that were authorized by the federal awarding agency or pass‐through entity. Condition: The Organization lacked supporting documentation for non‐payroll expenses. Due to lack of supporting documentation, period of performance could not be verified. Of the sixty (60) nonpayroll transactions examined, fourteen (14) lacked supporting documentation for review. Effect: Management possibly did not expend funds in accordance with the approved detailed lineitem budget and grant agreement and possibly expended funds in the incorrect period of performance. Cause: Expenses including approved invoices and/or supporting documentation were not properly maintained in part due to several changes in personnel within the accounting area and overall limited number of personnel for certain functions and lack of board oversight. Questioned costs: Known questioned costs of $2,066 and likely questioned costs of $11,507 for Healthy Start. Recommendation: We recommend that internal controls be strengthened and processes implemented to ensure all expenses include supporting documentation/invoice indicating period of performance.
We concur with this finding and have implemented measures to mitigate the repetition or additional occurrences. We mplemented an electronic system to more efficiently collect and store expenditures and supporting documentation, eliminating a paper filing system. We updated our fiscal policies and procedures in 2022 to document a standardized process for documenting expenditures and retaining receipts. For instance, invoices cannot be processed without adequate documentation. Additionally, credit card holders are responsible for submitting electronic credit card receipts to the fiscal office monthly. In 2022, an updated credit card policy was provided to all employees. The adherence to the credit card policy is monitored by the Fiscal Office and CEO. Responsible person(s): Jemea Dorsey, CEO and Jeanetta Johnson, Fiscal Manager Anticipated Completion Date: FY 2022
2020-009
The Organization has a policy which in includes thee Fiscal/Grant Manager and/or the CEO review all drawdown requests to ensure costs are paid before reimbursement is requested. However of the sixteen (16) drawdown requests that we tested, there was no evidence of review and approval for payment. Effect: Management possibly did not expend funds in accordance with the federal award due to lack of evidence of oversight/review of drawdowns and after reimbursable expenses have been incurred. Cause: Management did not document evidence of review and approval of drawdown requests. This was due in part to lack of oversight. Also there were several changes in personnel within the accounting area and overall limited number of personnel for certain functions and lack of board oversight. Questioned costs: None Recommendation: We recommend that internal controls be strengthened and processes implemented to ensure all draw down requests are reviewed and approved to ensure costs were accurately reported and paid before requesting reimbursement.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Federal Program Information: Funding Agency: U.S Department of Health and Human Services FALN: 93.926 Federal Award Identification Number: 5 H49MC00119‐21‐00 / 6 H49MC00119‐20‐01 Pass Through Entity: State of Georgia Department of Human Services Award Year: 2020‐2024 Criteria: Under 2 CFR Section 200.303(a), non‐federal entities must establish and maintain effective internal controls to provide reasonable assurance that the entity is managing the federal awards in compliance with statues, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Additionally regulations require the reimbursement payment method may be used on a Federal award for activities as specified in 2 CFR section 200.305(b)(3), program costs must be paid by non‐ Federal entity funds before submitting a payment request (2 CFR section 200.305(b)(3)), i.e., the non‐ Federal entity must disburse funds for program purposes before requesting payment from the Federal awarding agency or pass‐through entity. Condition: The Organization has a policy which in includes thee Fiscal/Grant Manager and/or the CEO review all drawdown requests to ensure costs are paid before reimbursement is requested. However of the sixteen (16) drawdown requests that we tested, there was no evidence of review and approval for payment. Effect: Management possibly did not expend funds in accordance with the federal award due to lack of evidence of oversight/review of drawdowns and after reimbursable expenses have been incurred. Cause: Management did not document evidence of review and approval of drawdown requests. This was due in part to lack of oversight. Also there were several changes in personnel within the accounting area and overall limited number of personnel for certain functions and lack of board oversight. Questioned costs: None Recommendation: We recommend that internal controls be strengthened and processes implemented to ensure all draw down requests are reviewed and approved to ensure costs were accurately reported and paid before requesting reimbursement.
concur with this finding and have implemented measures to mitigate the repetition or additional occurrences. In 2023, we implemented additional procedures to more efficiently review drawdowns and supporting documentation. We updated our fiscal policies and procedures in 2023 to document a standardized process for review and approval of drawdowns before request for reimbursement by the Fiscal Office and CEO. Responsible person(s): Jemea Dorsey, CEO and Jeanetta Johnson, Fiscal Manager Anticipated Completion Date: FY 2022
2020-010
The Organization does have approved policies and procedures over procurement that meet the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. However the Organization is not following its prescribed policies and procedures. The Organization lacked supporting documentation verifying procurement policies and procedures were followed. Due to lack of supporting documentation, procurement could not be verified. Of the sixty (60) transactions examined, fourteen (14) lacked supporting documentation for review of procurement. Effect: Not following procurement policies and procedures may result in funds to be returned back to grantor and/or impact future funding. Cause: Supporting procurement documentation for acquisition of property and services were not properly maintained in part due to several changes in personnel within the accounting area and overall limited number of personnel for certain functions and lack of board oversight. Questioned Costs: Known questioned costs of $2,066 and likely questioned costs of $11,507 for Healthy Start. Recommendation: We recommend the Organization strengthen its policies and procedures to ensure procurement is adequately documented for that goods and services purchased in accordance with Uniform Guidance and other federal guidelines.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Federal Program Information: Funding Agency: U.S Department of Health and Human Services FALN: 93.926 Federal Award Identification Number: 5 H49MC00119‐21‐00 / 6 H49MC00119‐20‐01 Pass Through Entity: State of Georgia Department of Human Services Award Year: 2020‐2024 Criteria: Under 2 CFR Section 200.303(a), non‐federal entities must establish and maintain effective internal controls to provide reasonable assurance that the entity is managing the federal awards in compliance with statues, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Additionally, under 2 CFR Section 200.320, the Organization must have and use documented procurement procedures for acquisition of property and services under a federal award or a sub‐award. Condition: The Organization does have approved policies and procedures over procurement that meet the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. However the Organization is not following its prescribed policies and procedures. The Organization lacked supporting documentation verifying procurement policies and procedures were followed. Due to lack of supporting documentation, procurement could not be verified. Of the sixty (60) transactions examined, fourteen (14) lacked supporting documentation for review of procurement. Effect: Not following procurement policies and procedures may result in funds to be returned back to grantor and/or impact future funding. Cause: Supporting procurement documentation for acquisition of property and services were not properly maintained in part due to several changes in personnel within the accounting area and overall limited number of personnel for certain functions and lack of board oversight. Questioned Costs: Known questioned costs of $2,066 and likely questioned costs of $11,507 for Healthy Start. Recommendation: We recommend the Organization strengthen its policies and procedures to ensure procurement is adequately documented for that goods and services purchased in accordance with Uniform Guidance and other federal guidelines.
We concur with this finding and have implemented measures to mitigate the repetition or additional occurrences. In 2020, we implemented an electronic system to more efficiently collect and store expenditures and supporting documentation, eliminating a paper filing system. We updated our fiscal policies and procedures in 2022 to include procurement and implemented a procedure for ensuring compliance with obtaining required bids, etc. Responsible person(s): Jemea Dorsey, CEO and Jeanetta Johnson, Fiscal Manager Anticipated Completion Date: FY 2022
2020-011
Under 2 CFR part 180, the Organization is required to verify suspension or debarment from the excluded parties list system regarding compliance. Though the Organization did not have a policy for suspension and debarment, the Organization complied with the requirements. Effect: Not having a suspension and debarment policy may result in funds to be returned back to grantor and/or impact future funding. Cause: Supporting suspension and debarment documentation for acquisition of property and services were not properly established in part due to several changes in personnel within the accounting area and overall limited number of personnel for certain functions and lack of board oversight. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation: We recommend the Organization strengthen its policies and procedures to ensure procurement and suspension and debarment is adequately documented for that goods and services purchased in accordance with Uniform Guidance and other federal guidelines. In addition, the Organization should verify that all vendors under covered transactions are not listed on the excluded parties list system by performing a search on sam.gov and maintaining the results of such search in the vendor’s file.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Federal Program Information: Funding Agency: U.S Department of Health and Human Services FALN: 93.926 Federal Award Identification Number: 5 H49MC00119‐21‐00 / 6 H49MC00119‐20‐01 Pass Through Entity: State of Georgia Department of Human Services Award Year: 2020‐2024 Criteria: Under 2 CFR Section 200.303(a), non‐federal entities must establish and maintain effective internal controls to provide reasonable assurance that the entity is managing the federal awards in compliance with statues, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Under 2 CFR part 180, the Organization is required to verify suspension or debarment from the excluded parties list system regarding compliance. Condition: Under 2 CFR part 180, the Organization is required to verify suspension or debarment from the excluded parties list system regarding compliance. Though the Organization did not have a policy for suspension and debarment, the Organization complied with the requirements. Effect: Not having a suspension and debarment policy may result in funds to be returned back to grantor and/or impact future funding. Cause: Supporting suspension and debarment documentation for acquisition of property and services were not properly established in part due to several changes in personnel within the accounting area and overall limited number of personnel for certain functions and lack of board oversight. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation: We recommend the Organization strengthen its policies and procedures to ensure procurement and suspension and debarment is adequately documented for that goods and services purchased in accordance with Uniform Guidance and other federal guidelines. In addition, the Organization should verify that all vendors under covered transactions are not listed on the excluded parties list system by performing a search on sam.gov and maintaining the results of such search in the vendor’s file.
We concur with this finding and have implemented measures to mitigate the repetition or additional occurrences. We implemented an electronic system to more efficiently collect and store expenditures and supporting documentation, eliminating a paper filing system. We updated our fiscal policies and procedures in 2022 to include procurement, suspension and debarment procedures and implemented a procedure for ensuring compliance with obtaining required bids, etc. Responsible person(s): Jemea Dorsey, CEO and Jeanetta Johnson, Fiscal Manager Anticipated Completion Date: FY 2022
2020-012
FAC accepted this audit on December 18, 2023 — management decision was due June 18, 2024.
The Organization lacked supporting documentation for non‐payroll expenses. Due to lack of supporting documentation and evidence of approval for payment could not be verified. Of the sixty (60) transactions examined, twelve (12) lacked supporting documentation for review, and approval for payment by a Manager. Effect: Management possibly did not expend funds in accordance with the approved detailed lineitem budget and grant agreement and possibly expended funds which did not contribute to the objective set forth for the program. (lack of approved invoices, lack of supporting documentation). Cause: Expenses including approved invoices and/or supporting documentation were not properly maintained in part due to several changes in personnel within the accounting area and overall limited number of personnel for certain functions and lack of board oversight. Questioned Costs: Known questioned costs of $3,931 and likely questioned costs of $17,477 for Healthy Start. Recommendation: We recommend that internal controls be strengthened and processes implemented to ensure all expenses include supporting documentation/invoice indicating nature of expense, amount, authorization and approval for payment.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Federal Program Information: Funding Agency: U.S Department of Health and Human Services FALN: 93.926 Federal Award Identification Number: H49MC00119‐19‐00 Pass Through Entity: State of Georgia Department of Human Services Award Year: 2018‐2020 Criteria: Under 2 CFR Section 200.303(a), non‐federal entities must establish and maintain effective internal controls to provide reasonable assurance that the entity is managing the federal awards in compliance with statues, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Additionally, regulations require that in order for activities and costs to be allowed under Federal awards, 45CFR, part 75 all costs must be adequately documented. Condition: The Organization lacked supporting documentation for non‐payroll expenses. Due to lack of supporting documentation and evidence of approval for payment could not be verified. Of the sixty (60) transactions examined, twelve (12) lacked supporting documentation for review, and approval for payment by a Manager. Effect: Management possibly did not expend funds in accordance with the approved detailed lineitem budget and grant agreement and possibly expended funds which did not contribute to the objective set forth for the program. (lack of approved invoices, lack of supporting documentation). Cause: Expenses including approved invoices and/or supporting documentation were not properly maintained in part due to several changes in personnel within the accounting area and overall limited number of personnel for certain functions and lack of board oversight. Questioned Costs: Known questioned costs of $3,931 and likely questioned costs of $17,477 for Healthy Start. Recommendation: We recommend that internal controls be strengthened and processes implemented to ensure all expenses include supporting documentation/invoice indicating nature of expense, amount, authorization and approval for payment.
We concur with this finding and have implemented measures to mitigate the repetition or additional occurrences. In 2020, we implemented an electronic system to more efficiently collect and store expenditures and supporting documentation, eliminating a paper filing system. We updated our fiscal policies and procedures in 2022 to document a standardized process for documenting expenditures and retaining receipts. For instance, invoices cannot be processed without adequate documentation. Additionally, credit card holders are responsible for submitting electronic credit card receipts to the fiscal office monthly. In 2022, an updated credit card policy was provided to all employees. The adherence to the credit card policy is monitored by the Fiscal Office and CEO. Responsible person(s): Jemea Dorsey, CEO and Jeanetta Johnson, Fiscal Manager Anticipated Completion Date: FY 2022
2019-008
We noted no evidence of review and approval of payroll expenses including time sheets, payroll registers, and payroll reconciliations. Of the forty (40) employees tested, twenty three (23) employees lacked approval by management. Effect: Management possibly did not expend funds in accordance with the approved detailed lineitem budget and grant agreement and possibly expended funds which did not contribute to the objective set forth for the program or correct period of performance (lack of approved time sheets, payroll registers and reconciliations). Cause: Payroll expenses lacked approved timesheets, approved payroll registers and approved reconciliations between budgeted payroll expenses per grant agreement and internal payroll reports. This was due in part due to several changes in personnel within the accounting area and overall limited number of personnel for certain functions and lack of board oversight. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation: We recommend that internal controls be strengthened and processes implemented to ensure all payroll expenses include evidence of review and approval for payment.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Federal Program Information: Funding Agency: U.S Department of Health and Human Services FALN: 93.926 Federal Award Identification Number: H49MC00119‐19‐00 Pass Through Entity: State of Georgia Department of Human Services Award Year: 2018‐2020 Criteria: Under 2 CFR Section 200.303(a), non‐federal entities must establish and maintain effective internal controls to provide reasonable assurance that the entity is managing the federal awards in compliance with statues, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Additionally, regulations require that in order for activities and costs to be allowed under Federal awards, 45CFR, part 75 all costs must be adequately documented. Condition: We noted no evidence of review and approval of payroll expenses including time sheets, payroll registers, and payroll reconciliations. Of the forty (40) employees tested, twenty three (23) employees lacked approval by management. Effect: Management possibly did not expend funds in accordance with the approved detailed lineitem budget and grant agreement and possibly expended funds which did not contribute to the objective set forth for the program or correct period of performance (lack of approved time sheets, payroll registers and reconciliations). Cause: Payroll expenses lacked approved timesheets, approved payroll registers and approved reconciliations between budgeted payroll expenses per grant agreement and internal payroll reports. This was due in part due to several changes in personnel within the accounting area and overall limited number of personnel for certain functions and lack of board oversight. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation: We recommend that internal controls be strengthened and processes implemented to ensure all payroll expenses include evidence of review and approval for payment.
We concur with this finding and have implemented measures to mitigate the repetition or additional occurrences. In 2020, we implemented additional procedures to more efficiently review payroll and supporting documentation. We updated our fiscal policies and procedures in 2022 to document a standardized process for review of payroll. Payroll cannot be processed without adequate review and documentation. Payroll is monitored by the Fiscal Office and CEO. Responsible person(s): Jemea Dorsey, CEO and Jeanetta Johnson, Fiscal Manager Anticipated Completion Date: FY 2022
2019-009
The Organization lacked supporting documentation for non‐payroll expenses. Due to lack of supporting documentation, period of performance could not be verified. Of the sixty (60) nonpayroll transactions examined, ten (10) lacked supporting documentation for review, and 1 expense was for services performed in a prior period. Effect: Management possibly did not expend funds in accordance with the approved detailed lineitem budget and grant agreement and possibly expended funds in the incorrect period of performance. Cause: Expenses including approved invoices and/or supporting documentation were not properly maintained in part due to several changes in personnel within the accounting area and overall limited number of personnel for certain functions and lack of board oversight. Questioned costs: Known questioned costs of $7,674 and likely questioned costs of $34,117 for Healthy Start. Recommendation: We recommend that internal controls be strengthened and processes implemented to ensure all expenses include supporting documentation/invoice indicating period of performance.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Federal Program Information: Funding Agency: U.S Department of Health and Human Services FALN: 93.926 Federal Award Identification Number: H49MC00119‐19‐00 Pass Through Entity: State of Georgia Department of Human Services Award Year: 2018‐2020 Criteria: Under 2 CFR Section 200.303(a), non‐federal entities must establish and maintain effective internal controls to provide reasonable assurance that the entity is managing the federal awards in compliance with statues, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Additionally, under 2 CFR sections 200.308 200.309 and 200.403(h)), the Organization may charge only allowable costs incurred during the approved budget period of a federal award’s period of performance and any costs incurred before the federal awarding agency or pass‐through entity made the federal award that were authorized by the federal awarding agency or pass‐through entity. Condition: The Organization lacked supporting documentation for non‐payroll expenses. Due to lack of supporting documentation, period of performance could not be verified. Of the sixty (60) nonpayroll transactions examined, ten (10) lacked supporting documentation for review, and 1 expense was for services performed in a prior period. Effect: Management possibly did not expend funds in accordance with the approved detailed lineitem budget and grant agreement and possibly expended funds in the incorrect period of performance. Cause: Expenses including approved invoices and/or supporting documentation were not properly maintained in part due to several changes in personnel within the accounting area and overall limited number of personnel for certain functions and lack of board oversight. Questioned costs: Known questioned costs of $7,674 and likely questioned costs of $34,117 for Healthy Start. Recommendation: We recommend that internal controls be strengthened and processes implemented to ensure all expenses include supporting documentation/invoice indicating period of performance.
We concur with this finding and have implemented measures to mitigate the repetition or additional occurrences. In 2020, we implemented an electronic system to more efficiently collect and store expenditures and supporting documentation, eliminating a paper filing system. We updated our fiscal policies and procedures in 2022 to document a standardized process for documenting expenditures and retaining receipts. For instance, invoices cannot be processed without adequate documentation. Additionally, credit card holders are responsible for submitting electronic credit card receipts to the fiscal office monthly. In 2022, an updated credit card policy was provided to all employees. The adherence to the credit card policy is monitored by the Fiscal Office and CEO. Responsible person(s): Jemea Dorsey, CEO and Jeanetta Johnson, Fiscal Manager Anticipated Completion Date: FY 2022
2019-010
The Organization has a policy which in includes thee Fiscal/Grant Manager and/or the CEO review all drawdown requests to ensure costs are paid before reimbursement is requested. However of the seventeen (17) drawdown requests that we tested, there was no evidence of review and approval for payment. Effect: Management possibly did not expend funds in accordance with the federal award due to lack of evidence of oversight/review of drawdowns and after reimbursable expenses have been incurred. Cause: Management did not document evidence of review and approval of drawdown requests. This was due in part to lack of oversight. Also there were several changes in personnel within the accounting area and overall limited number of personnel for certain functions and lack of board oversight. Questioned costs: None Recommendation: We recommend that internal controls be strengthened and processes implemented to ensure all draw down requests are reviewed and approved to ensure costs were accurately reported and paid before requesting reimbursement.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Federal Program Information: Funding Agency: U.S Department of Health and Human Services FALN: 93.926 Federal Award Identification Number: H49MC00119‐19‐00 Pass Through Entity: State of Georgia Department of Human Services Award Year: 2018‐2020 Criteria: Under 2 CFR Section 200.303(a), non‐federal entities must establish and maintain effective internal controls to provide reasonable assurance that the entity is managing the federal awards in compliance with statues, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Additionally regulations require the reimbursement payment method may be used on a Federal award for activities as specified in 2 CFR section 200.305(b)(3), program costs must be paid by non‐ Federal entity funds before submitting a payment request (2 CFR section 200.305(b)(3)), i.e., the non‐ Federal entity must disburse funds for program purposes before requesting payment from the Federal awarding agency or pass‐through entity. Condition: The Organization has a policy which in includes thee Fiscal/Grant Manager and/or the CEO review all drawdown requests to ensure costs are paid before reimbursement is requested. However of the seventeen (17) drawdown requests that we tested, there was no evidence of review and approval for payment. Effect: Management possibly did not expend funds in accordance with the federal award due to lack of evidence of oversight/review of drawdowns and after reimbursable expenses have been incurred. Cause: Management did not document evidence of review and approval of drawdown requests. This was due in part to lack of oversight. Also there were several changes in personnel within the accounting area and overall limited number of personnel for certain functions and lack of board oversight. Questioned costs: None Recommendation: We recommend that internal controls be strengthened and processes implemented to ensure all draw down requests are reviewed and approved to ensure costs were accurately reported and paid before requesting reimbursement.
We concur with this finding and have implemented measures to mitigate the repetition or additional occurrences. In 2023, we implemented additional procedures to more efficiently review drawdowns and supporting documentation. We updated our fiscal policies and procedures in 2023 to document a standardized process for review and approval of drawdowns before request for reimbursement by the Fiscal Office and CEO. Responsible person(s): Jemea Dorsey, CEO and Jeanetta Johnson, Fiscal Manager Anticipated Completion Date: FY 2022
2019-011
The Organization does have approved policies and procedures over procurement that meet the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. However the Organization is not following its prescribed policies and procedures. The Organization lacked supporting documentation verifying procurement policies and procedures were followed. Due to lack of supporting documentation, procurement could not be verified. Of the sixty (60) transactions examined, ten (10) lacked supporting documentation for review of procurement. Effect: Not following procurement policies and procedures may result in funds to be returned back to grantor and/or impact future funding. Cause: Supporting procurement documentation for acquisition of property and services were not properly maintained in part due to several changes in personnel within the accounting area and overall limited number of personnel for certain functions and lack of board oversight. Questioned Costs: Known questioned costs of $3,870 and likely questioned costs of $17,206 for Healthy Start. Recommendation: We recommend the Organization strengthen its policies and procedures to ensure procurement is adequately documented for that goods and services purchased in accordance with Uniform Guidance and other federal guidelines.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Federal Program Information: Funding Agency: U.S Department of Health and Human Services FALN: 93.926 Federal Award Identification Number: H49MC00119‐19‐00 Pass Through Entity: State of Georgia Department of Human Services Award Year: 2018‐:2020 Criteria: Under 2 CFR Section 200.303(a), non‐federal entities must establish and maintain effective internal controls to provide reasonable assurance that the entity is managing the federal awards in compliance with statues, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Additionally, under 2 CFR Section 200.320, the Organization must have and use documented procurement procedures for acquisition of property and services under a federal award or a sub‐award. Condition: The Organization does have approved policies and procedures over procurement that meet the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. However the Organization is not following its prescribed policies and procedures. The Organization lacked supporting documentation verifying procurement policies and procedures were followed. Due to lack of supporting documentation, procurement could not be verified. Of the sixty (60) transactions examined, ten (10) lacked supporting documentation for review of procurement. Effect: Not following procurement policies and procedures may result in funds to be returned back to grantor and/or impact future funding. Cause: Supporting procurement documentation for acquisition of property and services were not properly maintained in part due to several changes in personnel within the accounting area and overall limited number of personnel for certain functions and lack of board oversight. Questioned Costs: Known questioned costs of $3,870 and likely questioned costs of $17,206 for Healthy Start. Recommendation: We recommend the Organization strengthen its policies and procedures to ensure procurement is adequately documented for that goods and services purchased in accordance with Uniform Guidance and other federal guidelines.
We concur with this finding and have implemented measures to mitigate the repetition or additional occurrences. In 2020, we implemented an electronic system to more efficiently collect and store expenditures and supporting documentation, eliminating a paper filing system. We updated our fiscal policies and procedures in 2022 to include procurement and implemented a procedure for ensuring compliance with obtaining required bids, etc. Responsible person(s): Jemea Dorsey, CEO and Jeanetta Johnson, Fiscal Manager Anticipated Completion Date: FY 2022
2019-012
Under 2 CFR part 180, the Organization is required to verify suspension or debarment from the excluded parties list system regarding compliance. Though the Organization did not have a policy for suspension and debarment, the Organization complied with the requirements. Effect: Not having a suspension and debarment policy may result in funds to be returned back to grantor and/or impact future funding. Cause: Supporting suspension and debarment documentation for acquisition of property and services were not properly established in part due to several changes in personnel within the accounting area and overall limited number of personnel for certain functions and lack of board oversight. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation: We recommend the Organization strengthen its policies and procedures to ensure procurement and suspension and debarment is adequately documented for that goods and services purchased in accordance with Uniform Guidance and other federal guidelines. In addition, the Organization should verify that all vendors under covered transactions are not listed on the excluded parties list system by performing a search on sam.gov and maintaining the results of such search in the vendor’s file.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Federal Program Information: Funding Agency: U.S Department of Health and Human Services FALN: 93.926 Federal Award Identification Number: H49MC00119‐19‐00 Pass Through Entity: State of Georgia Department of Human Services Award Year: 2018‐2020 Criteria: Under 2 CFR Section 200.303(a), non‐federal entities must establish and maintain effective internal controls to provide reasonable assurance that the entity is managing the federal awards in compliance with statues, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Under 2 CFR part 180, the Organization is required to verify suspension or debarment from the excluded parties list system regarding compliance. Condition: Under 2 CFR part 180, the Organization is required to verify suspension or debarment from the excluded parties list system regarding compliance. Though the Organization did not have a policy for suspension and debarment, the Organization complied with the requirements. Effect: Not having a suspension and debarment policy may result in funds to be returned back to grantor and/or impact future funding. Cause: Supporting suspension and debarment documentation for acquisition of property and services were not properly established in part due to several changes in personnel within the accounting area and overall limited number of personnel for certain functions and lack of board oversight. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation: We recommend the Organization strengthen its policies and procedures to ensure procurement and suspension and debarment is adequately documented for that goods and services purchased in accordance with Uniform Guidance and other federal guidelines. In addition, the Organization should verify that all vendors under covered transactions are not listed on the excluded parties list system by performing a search on sam.gov and maintaining the results of such search in the vendor’s file.
We concur with this finding and have implemented measures to mitigate the repetition or additional occurrences. In 2020, we implemented an electronic system to more efficiently collect and store expenditures and supporting documentation, eliminating a paper filing system. We updated our fiscal policies and procedures in 2022 to include procurement, suspension and debarment procedures and implemented a procedure for ensuring compliance with obtaining required bids, etc. Responsible person(s): Jemea Dorsey, CEO and Jeanetta Johnson, Fiscal Manager Anticipated Completion Date: FY 2022
2019-012
FAC accepted this audit on August 29, 2023 — management decision was due February 29, 2024.
The Organization lacked supporting documentation for non-payroll expenses. Due to lack of supporting documentation and evidence of approval for payment could not be verified. Of the sixty (60) transactions examined, seventeen (17) lacked supporting documentation for review, and approval for payment by a Manager. Effect: Management possibly did not expend funds in accordance with the approved detailed line-item budget and grant agreement and possibly expended funds which did not contribute to the objective set forth for the program. (lack of approved invoices, lack of supporting documentation). Cause: Expenses including approved invoices and/or supporting documentation were not properly maintained in part due to several changes in personnel within the accounting area and overall limited number of personnel for certain functions and lack of board oversight. Questioned Costs: Known questioned costs of $17,435 and likely questioned costs of $74,135 for Healthy Start. Recommendation: We recommend that internal controls be strengthened and processes implemented to ensure all expenses include supporting documentation/invoice indicating nature of expense, amount, authorization and approval for payment.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴2019-008 Non Payroll Expenses- Material Weakness and Material Noncompliance Federal Program Information: Funding Agency: U.S Department of Health and Human Services FALN: 93.926 Federal Award Identification Number: H49MC00119-19-00 Pass Through Entity: State of Georgia Department of Human Services Award Year: 2018-:2019 Criteria: Under 2 CFR Section 200.303(a), non-federal entities must establish and maintain effective internal controls to provide reasonable assurance that the entity is managing the federal awards in compliance with statues, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Additionally, regulations require that in order for activities and costs to be allowed under Federal awards, 45CFR, part 75 all costs must be adequately documented. Condition: The Organization lacked supporting documentation for non-payroll expenses. Due to lack of supporting documentation and evidence of approval for payment could not be verified. Of the sixty (60) transactions examined, seventeen (17) lacked supporting documentation for review, and approval for payment by a Manager. Effect: Management possibly did not expend funds in accordance with the approved detailed line-item budget and grant agreement and possibly expended funds which did not contribute to the objective set forth for the program. (lack of approved invoices, lack of supporting documentation). Cause: Expenses including approved invoices and/or supporting documentation were not properly maintained in part due to several changes in personnel within the accounting area and overall limited number of personnel for certain functions and lack of board oversight. Questioned Costs: Known questioned costs of $17,435 and likely questioned costs of $74,135 for Healthy Start. Recommendation: We recommend that internal controls be strengthened and processes implemented to ensure all expenses include supporting documentation/invoice indicating nature of expense, amount, authorization and approval for payment.
Grantee Response and Corrective Action Plan 2019-008: We concur with this finding and have implemented measures to mitigate the repetition or additional occurrences. In 2020, we implemented an electronic system to more efficiently collect and store expenditures and supporting documentation, eliminating a paper filing system. We updated our fiscal policies and procedures in 2022 to document a standardized process for documenting expenditures and retaining receipts. For instance, invoices cannot be processed without adequate documentation. Additionally, credit card holders are responsible for submitting electronic credit card receipts to the fiscal office monthly. In 2022, an updated credit card policy was provided to all employees. The adherence to the credit card policy is monitored by the Fiscal Office and CEO. Responsible Parties: Jemea Dorsey, CEO Date Corrected: 11/01/2022
We noted no evidence of review and approval of payroll expenses including time sheets, payroll registers, and payroll reconciliations. Forty (40) transactions were examined, for fourteen (14) employees tested the reconciliation of payroll expenses to grant budget lacked approval by management. Seven (7) payroll registers tested lacked approval by management. Effect: Management possibly did not expend funds in accordance with the approved detailed line-item budget and grant agreement and possibly expended funds which did not contribute to the objective set forth for the program or correct period of performance (lack of approved time sheets, payroll registers and reconciliations). Cause: Payroll expenses lacked approved timesheets, approved payroll registers and approved reconciliations between budgeted payroll expenses per grant agreement and internal payroll reports. This was due in part due to several changes in personnel within the accounting area and overall limited number of personnel for certain functions and lack of board oversight. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation: We recommend that internal controls be strengthened and processes implemented to ensure all payroll expenses include evidence of review and approval for payment.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴2019-009 Payroll Expenses- Material Weakness Federal Program Information: Funding Agency: U.S Department of Health and Human Services FALN: 93.926 Federal Award Identification Number: H49MC00119-19-00 Pass Through Entity: State of Georgia Department of Human Services Award Year: 2018-:2019 Criteria: Under 2 CFR Section 200.303(a), non-federal entities must establish and maintain effective internal controls to provide reasonable assurance that the entity is managing the federal awards in compliance with statues, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Additionally, regulations require that in order for activities and costs to be allowed under Federal awards, 45CFR, part 75 all costs must be adequately documented. Condition: We noted no evidence of review and approval of payroll expenses including time sheets, payroll registers, and payroll reconciliations. Forty (40) transactions were examined, for fourteen (14) employees tested the reconciliation of payroll expenses to grant budget lacked approval by management. Seven (7) payroll registers tested lacked approval by management. Effect: Management possibly did not expend funds in accordance with the approved detailed line-item budget and grant agreement and possibly expended funds which did not contribute to the objective set forth for the program or correct period of performance (lack of approved time sheets, payroll registers and reconciliations). Cause: Payroll expenses lacked approved timesheets, approved payroll registers and approved reconciliations between budgeted payroll expenses per grant agreement and internal payroll reports. This was due in part due to several changes in personnel within the accounting area and overall limited number of personnel for certain functions and lack of board oversight. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation: We recommend that internal controls be strengthened and processes implemented to ensure all payroll expenses include evidence of review and approval for payment.
Grantee Response and Corrective Action Plan 2019-009: We concur with this finding and have implemented measures to mitigate the repetition or additional occurrences. In 2020, we implemented additional procedures to more efficiently review payroll and supporting documentation. We updated our fiscal policies and procedures in 2022 to document a standardized process for review of payroll. Payroll cannot be processed without adequate review and documentation. Payroll is monitored by the Fiscal Office and CEO.Responsible Parties: Jemea Dorsey, CEO Date Corrected: 1/1/2022
The Organization lacked supporting documentation for non-payroll expenses. Due to lack of supporting documentation, period of performance could not be verified. Of the sixty (60) transactions examined, seventeen (17) lacked supporting documentation for review, and 1 expense was for services performed in a prior period. Effect: Management possibly did not expend funds in accordance with the approved detailed line-item budget and grant agreement and possibly expended funds in the incorrect period of performance. Cause: Expenses including approved invoices and/or supporting documentation were not properly maintained in part due to several changes in personnel within the accounting area and overall limited number of personnel for certain functions and lack of board oversight. Questioned costs: Known questioned costs of $13,468 and likely questioned costs of $103,272 for Healthy Start. Recommendation: We recommend that internal controls be strengthened and processes implemented to ensure all expenses include supporting documentation/invoice indicating period of performance.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴2019-010: Period of Performance ? Material Weakness and Material Noncompliance Federal Program Information: Funding Agency: U.S Department of Health and Human Services FALN: 93.926 Federal Award Identification Number: H49MC00119-19-00 Pass Through Entity: State of Georgia Department of Human Services Award Year: 2018-:2019 Criteria: Under 2 CFR Section 200.303(a), non-federal entities must establish and maintain effective internal controls to provide reasonable assurance that the entity is managing the federal awards in compliance with statues, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Additionally, under 2 CFR sections 200.308 200.309 and 200.403(h)), the Organization may charge only allowable costs incurred during the approved budget period of a federal award?s period of performance and any costs incurred before the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity made the federal award that were authorized by the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity. Condition: The Organization lacked supporting documentation for non-payroll expenses. Due to lack of supporting documentation, period of performance could not be verified. Of the sixty (60) transactions examined, seventeen (17) lacked supporting documentation for review, and 1 expense was for services performed in a prior period. Effect: Management possibly did not expend funds in accordance with the approved detailed line-item budget and grant agreement and possibly expended funds in the incorrect period of performance. Cause: Expenses including approved invoices and/or supporting documentation were not properly maintained in part due to several changes in personnel within the accounting area and overall limited number of personnel for certain functions and lack of board oversight. Questioned costs: Known questioned costs of $13,468 and likely questioned costs of $103,272 for Healthy Start. Recommendation: We recommend that internal controls be strengthened and processes implemented to ensure all expenses include supporting documentation/invoice indicating period of performance.
Grantee Response and Corrective Action Plan 2019-010: We concur with this finding and have implemented measures to mitigate the repetition or additional occurrences. In 2020, we implemented an electronic system to more efficiently collect and store expenditures and supporting documentation, eliminating a paper filing system. We updated our fiscal policies and procedures in 2022 to document a standardized process for documenting expenditures and retaining receipts. For instance, invoices cannot be processed without adequate documentation. Additionally, credit card holders are responsible for submitting electronic credit card receipts to the fiscal office monthly. In 2022, an updated credit card policy was provided to all employees. The adherence to the credit card policy is monitored by the Fiscal Office and CEO. Responsible Parties: Jemea Dorsey, CEO Date Corrected: 01/01/2022
The Organization has a policy which in includes thee Fiscal/Grant Manager and/or the CEO review all drawdown requests to ensure costs are paid before reimbursement is requested. However of the twelve (12) drawdown requests (one per month) that we tested there was no evidence of review and approval for payment. Effect: Management possibly did not expend funds in accordance with the federal award due to lack of evidence of oversight/review of drawdowns and after reimbursable expenses have been incurred. Cause: Management did not document evidence of review and approval of drawdown requests. This was due in part to lack of oversight. Also there were several changes in personnel within the accounting area and overall limited number of personnel for certain functions and lack of board oversight. Questioned costs: None Recommendation: We recommend that internal controls be strengthened and processes implemented to ensure all draw down requests are reviewed and approved to ensure costs were accurately reported and paid before requesting reimbursement.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴2019-011: Cash Management - Material Weakness Federal Program Information: Funding Agency: U.S Department of Health and Human Services FALN: 93.926 Federal Award Identification Number: H49MC00119-19-00 Pass Through Entity: State of Georgia Department of Human Services Award Year: 2018-:2019 Criteria: Under 2 CFR Section 200.303(a), non-federal entities must establish and maintain effective internal controls to provide reasonable assurance that the entity is managing the federal awards in compliance with statues, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Additionally regulations require the reimbursement payment method may be used on a Federal award for activities as specified in 2 CFR section 200.305(b)(3), program costs must be paid by non-Federal entity funds before submitting a payment request (2 CFR section 200.305(b)(3)), i.e., the non-Federal entity must disburse funds for program purposes before requesting payment from the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity. Condition: The Organization has a policy which in includes thee Fiscal/Grant Manager and/or the CEO review all drawdown requests to ensure costs are paid before reimbursement is requested. However of the twelve (12) drawdown requests (one per month) that we tested there was no evidence of review and approval for payment. Effect: Management possibly did not expend funds in accordance with the federal award due to lack of evidence of oversight/review of drawdowns and after reimbursable expenses have been incurred. Cause: Management did not document evidence of review and approval of drawdown requests. This was due in part to lack of oversight. Also there were several changes in personnel within the accounting area and overall limited number of personnel for certain functions and lack of board oversight. Questioned costs: None Recommendation: We recommend that internal controls be strengthened and processes implemented to ensure all draw down requests are reviewed and approved to ensure costs were accurately reported and paid before requesting reimbursement.
Grantee Response and Corrective Action Plan 2019-011: We concur with this finding and have implemented measures to mitigate the repetition or additional occurrences. In 2023, we implemented additional procedures to more efficiently review drawdowns and supporting documentation. We updated our fiscal policies and procedures in 2023 to document a standardized process for review and approval of drawdowns before request for reimbursement by the Fiscal Office and CEO. Responsible Parties: Jemea Dorsey, CEO Date Corrected: 01/01/2022
The Organization does have approved policies and procedures over procurement that meet the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. However the Organization is not following its prescribed policies and procedures. The Organization lacked supporting documentation verifying procurement policies and procedures were followed. Due to lack of supporting documentation, procurement could not be verified. Of the sixty (60) transactions examined, seventeen (17) lacked supporting documentation for review of procurement. Further under 2 CFR part 180, the Organization is required to verify suspension or debarment from the excluded parties list system regarding compliance. Though the Organization?s policies and procedures for suspension and debarment did not meet the requirements of the Uniform Guidance and other federal guidelines, the Organization complied with the requirements. Effect: Not following procurement, suspension and debarment policies and procedures may result in funds to be returned back to grantor and/or impact future funding. Cause: Supporting procurement, suspension and debarment documentation for acquisition of property and services were not properly maintained in part due to several changes in personnel within the accounting area and overall limited number of personnel for certain functions and lack of board oversight. Questioned Costs: Known questioned costs of $9,318 and likely questioned costs of $57,773 for Healthy Start. Recommendation: We recommend the Organization strengthen its policies and procedures to ensure procurement and suspension and debarment is adequately documented for that goods and services purchased in accordance with Uniform Guidance and other federal guidelines. In addition, the Organization should verify that all vendors under covered transactions are not listed on the excluded parties list system by performing a search on sam.gov and maintaining the results of such search in the vendor?s file.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴2019-012: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment- Material Weakness and Material Noncompliance Federal Program Information: Funding Agency: U.S Department of Health and Human Services FALN: 93.926 Federal Award Identification Number: H49MC00119-19-00 Pass Through Entity: State of Georgia Department of Human Services Award Year: 2018-:2019 Criteria: Under 2 CFR Section 200.303(a), non-federal entities must establish and maintain effective internal controls to provide reasonable assurance that the entity is managing the federal awards in compliance with statues, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Additionally, under 2 CFR Section 200.320, the Organization must have and use documented procurement procedures for acquisition of property and services under a federal award or a sub-award. Further under 2 CFR part 180, the Organization is required to verify suspension or debarment from the excluded parties list system regarding compliance. Condition: The Organization does have approved policies and procedures over procurement that meet the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. However the Organization is not following its prescribed policies and procedures. The Organization lacked supporting documentation verifying procurement policies and procedures were followed. Due to lack of supporting documentation, procurement could not be verified. Of the sixty (60) transactions examined, seventeen (17) lacked supporting documentation for review of procurement. Further under 2 CFR part 180, the Organization is required to verify suspension or debarment from the excluded parties list system regarding compliance. Though the Organization?s policies and procedures for suspension and debarment did not meet the requirements of the Uniform Guidance and other federal guidelines, the Organization complied with the requirements. Effect: Not following procurement, suspension and debarment policies and procedures may result in funds to be returned back to grantor and/or impact future funding. Cause: Supporting procurement, suspension and debarment documentation for acquisition of property and services were not properly maintained in part due to several changes in personnel within the accounting area and overall limited number of personnel for certain functions and lack of board oversight. Questioned Costs: Known questioned costs of $9,318 and likely questioned costs of $57,773 for Healthy Start. Recommendation: We recommend the Organization strengthen its policies and procedures to ensure procurement and suspension and debarment is adequately documented for that goods and services purchased in accordance with Uniform Guidance and other federal guidelines. In addition, the Organization should verify that all vendors under covered transactions are not listed on the excluded parties list system by performing a search on sam.gov and maintaining the results of such search in the vendor?s file.
Grantee Response and Corrective Action Plan 2019-012: We concur with this finding and have implemented measures to mitigate the repetition or additional occurrences. In 2020, we implemented an electronic system to more efficiently collect and store expenditures and supporting documentation, eliminating a paper filing system. We updated our fiscal policies and procedures in 2022 to include procurement, suspension and debarment procedures and implemented a procedure for ensuring compliance with obtaining required bids, etc. Responsible Parties: Jemea Dorsey, CEO Date Corrected: 09/08/2022
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Monitor subrecipient audit findings and compliance status.
Start monitoring →© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.