MERCY NEIGHBORHOOD MINISTRIES, INC.

EIN: 571144097

UEI: M4THKMDFHGZ8

Data as of August 26, 2026

MERCY NEIGHBORHOOD MINISTRIES, INC.4 audit years5 findings2 repeat
4
Audit Years
5
Total Findings
2
Repeat Findings

FY 2023-08-31

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on July 15, 2024. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by January 15, 2025 (588 days ago).

What is a management decision? →
2023-001
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability / Subrecipient Monitoring / Special Tests & Provisions
MATERIAL WEAKNESSREPEAT

During our audit, we noted that the duties of the Director of Finance were such that lend themselves to improper segregation of duties due to the structure of being a small nonprofit organization. Segregation of duties ensures that the same person who has physical assets to assets is not the same person who posts transactions to the financial records and performs reconciliation procedures related to those assets. Criteria: Adequate segregation of duties reduces the likelihood that errors (intentional or unintentional) will remain undetected by providing for separate processing by different individuals at various stages of a transaction and for independent review of the work performed. The basic idea underlying segregation of duties is that no one employee or group of employees should be in a position both to perpetrate and conceal errors or irregularities in the normal course of their duties. In general, the principal incompatible duties to be segregated are: authorization of transactions, custody of assets, and recording or reporting of transactions. Effect: Although we noted during our prior audits that there was oversight over MNM’s financial activities by the Executive Director on a daily basis and the Board of Directors through review of financial information at their bi-monthly meetings, the Director of Finance was able to circumvent these compensating controls and misappropriate assets of MNM as described in the notes to the financial statements. Cause: The extent to which MNM can segregate duties is limited being a small non-profit based on the number of personnel, their skill set and workload, and the overall cost of implementing the proper segregation of duties. Auditor Recommendation: Revaluate the current duties of the staff responsible for financial reporting of MNM related to segregation of duties and compensating controls and implement safeguards to ensure that responsible employees follow through and are held accountable for their financial duties.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Segregation of Duties Material Weakness in Internal Control Condition: During our audit, we noted that the duties of the Director of Finance were such that lend themselves to improper segregation of duties due to the structure of being a small nonprofit organization. Segregation of duties ensures that the same person who has physical assets to assets is not the same person who posts transactions to the financial records and performs reconciliation procedures related to those assets. Criteria: Adequate segregation of duties reduces the likelihood that errors (intentional or unintentional) will remain undetected by providing for separate processing by different individuals at various stages of a transaction and for independent review of the work performed. The basic idea underlying segregation of duties is that no one employee or group of employees should be in a position both to perpetrate and conceal errors or irregularities in the normal course of their duties. In general, the principal incompatible duties to be segregated are: authorization of transactions, custody of assets, and recording or reporting of transactions. Effect: Although we noted during our prior audits that there was oversight over MNM’s financial activities by the Executive Director on a daily basis and the Board of Directors through review of financial information at their bi-monthly meetings, the Director of Finance was able to circumvent these compensating controls and misappropriate assets of MNM as described in the notes to the financial statements. Cause: The extent to which MNM can segregate duties is limited being a small non-profit based on the number of personnel, their skill set and workload, and the overall cost of implementing the proper segregation of duties. Auditor Recommendation: Revaluate the current duties of the staff responsible for financial reporting of MNM related to segregation of duties and compensating controls and implement safeguards to ensure that responsible employees follow through and are held accountable for their financial duties.

Corrective Action Plan

Management’s Response: Management has revised MNM’s segregation of duties and compensating controls surrounding financial reporting and has implemented the appropriate safeguards to ensure they are adhered to. MNM has developed written procedures and incorporated the following controls surrounding cash receipts and disbursements. • Maintenance of a daily log of cash receipts and disbursements • Restrict access to cash and checks to authorized individuals • Maintain adequate supporting documentation for all cash receipts and disbursements • Recount of daily cash receipts by more than one individual for accuracy • Make deposits and post to accounts receivable on a regular basis at a minimum weekly • Safeguard cash and checks for deposits in a secure location (i.e. safe or lockbox) • Cash receipts are verified to daily log and supporting documentation as part of bank reconciliation process • Cash receipt and disbursement detail to be reviewed by Executive Director

Prior Finding References

2022-001

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles, Subrecipient Monitoring, Special Tests and Provisions →
2023-002
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability / Subrecipient Monitoring / Special Tests & Provisions
MATERIAL WEAKNESSREPEAT

During our audit procedures we noted that timely and complete monthly and annual financial account reconciliations did not take place. As a result, we proposed and management recorded journal entries to correct the misstatements that had a material effect on MNM’s accounting records. Criteria: Preparing reliable financial information is a key responsibility of management. The ability to effectively manage MNM requires access to timely and accurate financial information that informs decision making. Management’s ability to fulfill its financial reporting responsibilities depends in part on the design and effectiveness of the controls and safeguards over financial reporting. Effect: Errors and/or fraud can occur and not be detected and corrected on a timely basis. Cause: Lack of management oversight. Auditor Recommendation: We recommend that procedures and controls are implemented in order to prepare timely and accurate financial information in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Internal Control Over Financial Reporting Material Weakness in Internal Control Condition: During our audit procedures we noted that timely and complete monthly and annual financial account reconciliations did not take place. As a result, we proposed and management recorded journal entries to correct the misstatements that had a material effect on MNM’s accounting records. Criteria: Preparing reliable financial information is a key responsibility of management. The ability to effectively manage MNM requires access to timely and accurate financial information that informs decision making. Management’s ability to fulfill its financial reporting responsibilities depends in part on the design and effectiveness of the controls and safeguards over financial reporting. Effect: Errors and/or fraud can occur and not be detected and corrected on a timely basis. Cause: Lack of management oversight. Auditor Recommendation: We recommend that procedures and controls are implemented in order to prepare timely and accurate financial information in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

Corrective Action Plan

Management’s Response: Management will implement procedures to ensure that timely and accurate financial information is prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

Prior Finding References

2022-002

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles, Subrecipient Monitoring, Special Tests and Provisions →
2023-003
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability / Subrecipient Monitoring / Special Tests & Provisions

The audit for fiscal year 2022 was not completed and submitted timely to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse by the appropriate due date as required by the Uniform Guidance. Criteria: As required by the Uniform Guidance the audit shall be completed and reporting packages shall be submitted to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse within the earlier of 30 days after receipt of the auditor’s report, or nine months after the end of the audit period, unless a longer period is agreed to in advance by the cognizant or oversight agency for the audit. Effect: In accordance with the Uniform Guidance, MNM did not meet the criteria for a low-risk auditee because the audit was not filed by the due date. Cause: Delays in the independent audit process prevented the timely filing of the audit with the Federal Audit Clearinghouse as required by the Uniform Guidance. Auditor Recommendation: Implement procedures to ensure the timely filing of the audit with the Federal Audit Clearinghouse as required by the Uniform Guidance.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Single Audit Submission to Federal Audit Clearinghouse Federal Agencies: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Pass-through Entity: School District of Philadelphia Head Start – Assistance Listing #93.600 Significant Deficiency Condition: The audit for fiscal year 2022 was not completed and submitted timely to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse by the appropriate due date as required by the Uniform Guidance. Criteria: As required by the Uniform Guidance the audit shall be completed and reporting packages shall be submitted to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse within the earlier of 30 days after receipt of the auditor’s report, or nine months after the end of the audit period, unless a longer period is agreed to in advance by the cognizant or oversight agency for the audit. Effect: In accordance with the Uniform Guidance, MNM did not meet the criteria for a low-risk auditee because the audit was not filed by the due date. Cause: Delays in the independent audit process prevented the timely filing of the audit with the Federal Audit Clearinghouse as required by the Uniform Guidance. Auditor Recommendation: Implement procedures to ensure the timely filing of the audit with the Federal Audit Clearinghouse as required by the Uniform Guidance.

Corrective Action Plan

Management's Response: MNM will implement financial policies and procedures to ensure a timely independent audit process and subsequent timely filing of the audit with the Federal Audit Clearinghouse.

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles, Subrecipient Monitoring, Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2022-08-31

FAC accepted this audit on August 10, 2023 — management decision was due February 10, 2024.

2022-001
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability / Reporting / Special Tests & Provisions
MATERIAL WEAKNESS

Finding 2022-01 Segregation of Duties Material Weakness in Internal Control Condition During out audit, we noted that the duties of the Director of Finance were such that lend themselves to improper segregation of duties due to the structure of being a small nonprofit organization. Segregation of duties ensures that the same person who has physical assets to assets is not the same person who posts transactions to the financial records and performs reconciliation procedures related to those assets. Criteria Adequate segregation of duties reduces the likelihood that errors (intentional or unintentional) will remain undetected by providing for separate processing by different individuals at various stages of a transaction and for independent review of the work performed. The basic idea underlying segregation of duties is that no one employee or group of employees should be in a position both to perpetrate and conceal errors or irregularities in the normal course of their duties. In general, the principal incompatible duties to be segregated are: authorization of transactions, custody of assets, and recording or reporting of transactions. Cause The extent to which the Organization can segregate duties is limited being a small non-profit based on the number of personnel, their skill set and workload, and the overall cost of implementing the proper segregation of duties. Effect Although we noted during our prior audits that there was oversight over the Organization?s financial activities by the Executive Director on a daily basis and the Board of Directors through review of financial information at their bi-weekly meetings, the Director of Finance was able to circumvent these compensating controls and misappropriate assets of the Organization as described in the notes to the financial statements. Auditor Recommendation Revaluate the current duties of the staff responsible for financial reporting of the Organization related to segregation of duties and compensating controls and implement safeguards to ensure that responsible employees follow through and are held accountable for their financial duties.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding 2022-01 Segregation of Duties Material Weakness in Internal Control Condition During out audit, we noted that the duties of the Director of Finance were such that lend themselves to improper segregation of duties due to the structure of being a small nonprofit organization. Segregation of duties ensures that the same person who has physical assets to assets is not the same person who posts transactions to the financial records and performs reconciliation procedures related to those assets. Criteria Adequate segregation of duties reduces the likelihood that errors (intentional or unintentional) will remain undetected by providing for separate processing by different individuals at various stages of a transaction and for independent review of the work performed. The basic idea underlying segregation of duties is that no one employee or group of employees should be in a position both to perpetrate and conceal errors or irregularities in the normal course of their duties. In general, the principal incompatible duties to be segregated are: authorization of transactions, custody of assets, and recording or reporting of transactions. Cause The extent to which the Organization can segregate duties is limited being a small non-profit based on the number of personnel, their skill set and workload, and the overall cost of implementing the proper segregation of duties. Effect Although we noted during our prior audits that there was oversight over the Organization?s financial activities by the Executive Director on a daily basis and the Board of Directors through review of financial information at their bi-weekly meetings, the Director of Finance was able to circumvent these compensating controls and misappropriate assets of the Organization as described in the notes to the financial statements. Auditor Recommendation Revaluate the current duties of the staff responsible for financial reporting of the Organization related to segregation of duties and compensating controls and implement safeguards to ensure that responsible employees follow through and are held accountable for their financial duties.

Corrective Action Plan

Views of Responsible Officials The Organization has developed written procedures and incorporated the following controls surrounding cash receipts and disbursements. ? Maintenance of a daily log of cash receipts and disbursements. ? Restrict access to cash and checks to authorized individuals ? Maintain adequate supporting documentation for all cash receipts and disbursements ? Recount of daily cash receipts by more than one individual for accuracy ? Make deposits and post to accounts receivable on a regular basis at a minimum weekly ? Safeguard cash and checks for deposits in a secure location (i.e. safe or lockbox) ? Cash receipts are verified to daily log and supporting documentation as part of bank reconciliation process ? Cash receipt and disbursement detail to be reviewed by Executive Director

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles, Reporting, Special Tests and Provisions →
2022-002
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability / Reporting / Special Tests & Provisions
MATERIAL WEAKNESS

Finding 2022-02 Internal Control Over Financial Reporting Material Weakness in Internal Control Condition Our audit procedures identified material misstatements such that we concluded THE ORGANIZATION was unable to present its accounting records in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. As a result, we proposed and management recorded journal entries to correct the misstatements that had a material effect on the Organization?s accounting records. Criteria Statement on auditing Standards No. 115 "Communicating Internal Control Related Matters Identified in an Audit" ("SAS 115") focuses on how the auditor communicates matters related to internal controls to the client. One area SAS 115 emphasizes is internal control over financial reporting. Cause Lack of management oversight. Effect Errors and/or fraud can occur and not be detected and corrected on a timely basis. Auditor Recommendation We recommend that procedures and controls are implemented in order to prepare timely and accurate financial information in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding 2022-02 Internal Control Over Financial Reporting Material Weakness in Internal Control Condition Our audit procedures identified material misstatements such that we concluded THE ORGANIZATION was unable to present its accounting records in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. As a result, we proposed and management recorded journal entries to correct the misstatements that had a material effect on the Organization?s accounting records. Criteria Statement on auditing Standards No. 115 "Communicating Internal Control Related Matters Identified in an Audit" ("SAS 115") focuses on how the auditor communicates matters related to internal controls to the client. One area SAS 115 emphasizes is internal control over financial reporting. Cause Lack of management oversight. Effect Errors and/or fraud can occur and not be detected and corrected on a timely basis. Auditor Recommendation We recommend that procedures and controls are implemented in order to prepare timely and accurate financial information in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

Corrective Action Plan

Views of Responsible Officials Management will implement procedures to ensure that timely and accurate financial information is prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles, Reporting, Special Tests and Provisions →

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and compliance status.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.