EIN: 566001527
UEI: KGCCCHJJZZ43
Data as of August 27, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on March 30, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by September 30, 2026 (34 days from today).
What is a management decision? →Questioned Costs: Context: Effect: Identification of a repeat finding: Cause: These control deficiencies and noncompliance increase the risk of improper Medicaid payments, potentially resulting in overpayments to ineligible beneficiaries or underpayments to those who qualify. This is a repeat finding from the immediate previous audit, 2024-001 and 2024- 002. Note in FY 2025 Medicaid findings were combined into a single finding. The deficiencies and noncompliance reported above are caused from ineffective record keeping and case review processes due to insufficient training of staff, lack of oversight from management, and/or inadequate communication between departments resulting in inconsistencies in data sharing and delayed information exchanges. There were a total of 10 errors found during our testing procedures: - There were 1 errors where income or household size was incorrectly calculated or inaccurate information was entered into the case file. - There was 1 error where resources were incorrectly calculated or were not properly documented in the case file. - There were 3 errors where applicants/beneficiaries not reviewed timely and determined to be eligible for Medicaid when their SSI benefits were terminated. - There were 5 errors where a redetermination of eligibility was not performed in accordance with program requirements. Due to the nature of the populations provided from which the samples were chosen, we are unable to calculate questioned costs for the above mentioned potential eligibility and noncompliance errors. We examined 60 cases from of a total of 698,591 Medicaid claims from the Medicaid beneficiary report provided by NC Department of Health and Human Services to re-determine eligibility. These findings are being reported with the financial statement audit as it relates to Medicaid administrative cost compliance audit. Section III. Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (continued) 187ROCKINGHAM COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2025 Recommendation: Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Program Name: Medical Assistance Program (Medicaid) AL #: 93.778 SIGNIFICANT DEFICENCY/NONCOMPLIANCE: Finding 2025-001 also apply to State requirements and State Awards. Section IV. State Award Findings and Questioned Costs Section III. Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (continued) We recommend that management enhance internal controls by: (1) Providing comprehensive training to staff on the program's eligibility requirements and procedures outlined in the State's Medicaid manuals; (2) Ensuring that there is a formal internal review process and that it is adequately completed to identify and correct errors and monitor compliance; and (3) Communicating all program or policy changes clearly and timely across all departments who oversee eligibility determinations for federal funded programs. The County agrees with the finding and is implementing actions to correct these issues, which are further discussed in the corrective action plan. 188
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴ROCKINGHAM COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2025 Any audit findings disclosed that are required to be reported in accordance with the State Single Audit Implementation Act X yes no Identification of major State programs: Program Name Foster Care and Adoption Cluster Medical Assistance Program State Aid to Airports Program Dollar threshold used to determine a State major program $ 500,000 Auditee qualified as low-risk auditee? yes X no None Reported. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Passed through the NC Department of Health and Human Services Program Name: Medical Assistance Program (Medicaid) AL #: 93.778 Finding: 2025-001 SIGNIFICANT DEFICENCY; NONCOMPLIANCE Eligibility Criteria: Section III. Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs Section II. Financial Statement Findings Section I. Summary of Auditors' Results Federal regulations under 42 CFR § 435.956 require states to verify eligibility factors using electronic data sources where available, and to obtain documentation for unverifiable information. Additionally, the state's Medicaid manual (Aged, Blind and Disabled manual, Family and Children Medicaid manual and the Integrated Policy manual) mandates that all eligibility determinations include crossverification of applicant-provided data against reliable external sources to ensure accuracy and prevent improper payments. 186ROCKINGHAM COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2025 Condition: Questioned Costs: Context: Effect: Identification of a repeat finding: Cause: These control deficiencies and noncompliance increase the risk of improper Medicaid payments, potentially resulting in overpayments to ineligible beneficiaries or underpayments to those who qualify. This is a repeat finding from the immediate previous audit, 2024-001 and 2024- 002. Note in FY 2025 Medicaid findings were combined into a single finding. The deficiencies and noncompliance reported above are caused from ineffective record keeping and case review processes due to insufficient training of staff, lack of oversight from management, and/or inadequate communication between departments resulting in inconsistencies in data sharing and delayed information exchanges. There were a total of 10 errors found during our testing procedures: - There were 1 errors where income or household size was incorrectly calculated or inaccurate information was entered into the case file. - There was 1 error where resources were incorrectly calculated or were not properly documented in the case file. - There were 3 errors where applicants/beneficiaries not reviewed timely and determined to be eligible for Medicaid when their SSI benefits were terminated. - There were 5 errors where a redetermination of eligibility was not performed in accordance with program requirements. Due to the nature of the populations provided from which the samples were chosen, we are unable to calculate questioned costs for the above mentioned potential eligibility and noncompliance errors. We examined 60 cases from of a total of 698,591 Medicaid claims from the Medicaid beneficiary report provided by NC Department of Health and Human Services to re-determine eligibility. These findings are being reported with the financial statement audit as it relates to Medicaid administrative cost compliance audit. Section III. Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (continued) 187ROCKINGHAM COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2025 Recommendation: Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Program Name: Medical Assistance Program (Medicaid) AL #: 93.778 SIGNIFICANT DEFICENCY/NONCOMPLIANCE: Finding 2025-001 also apply to State requirements and State Awards. Section IV. State Award Findings and Questioned Costs Section III. Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (continued) We recommend that management enhance internal controls by: (1) Providing comprehensive training to staff on the program's eligibility requirements and procedures outlined in the State's Medicaid manuals; (2) Ensuring that there is a formal internal review process and that it is adequately completed to identify and correct errors and monitor compliance; and (3) Communicating all program or policy changes clearly and timely across all departments who oversee eligibility determinations for federal funded programs. The County agrees with the finding and is implementing actions to correct these issues, which are further discussed in the corrective action plan. 188
CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2025 Finding: 2025-001 Name of contact person: Corrective Action: Proposed Completion Date: Section III – Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs All identified cases are being reviewed and corrected to ensure compliance. Supervisors will conduct targeted refresher training on income and resource calculation, SSI termination procedures, and redetermination timeliness and procedures. Regular quality assurance reviews and staff support will continue to ensure sustained compliance and improved accuracy in case processing. Training will be completed by December 15, 2025. Corrective actions for finding 2025-001 also apply to the State Awards findings. Section IV – State Award Findings and Questioned Costs Lisa Chaney, Nicole Victory and Debbie McGuire - Medicaid Supervisors; Mandy Edwards - Medicaid Manager 189
2024-001
FAC accepted this audit on February 7, 2025 — management decision was due August 7, 2025.
Questioned Costs: There were 2 errors discovered during our procedures that inaccurate information was entered when determining eligibility. There was no known affect to eligibility and there were no known questioned costs. In accordance with 42 CFR 435, documentation must be obtained as needed to determine if a recipient meets specific standards, and documentation must be maintained to support eligibility determinations. In accordance with 2 CFR 200, management should have an adequate system of internal controls procedures in place to ensure an applicant is properly determined or redetermined for benefits.Context: Effect: Identification of a repeat finding: Cause: Recommendation: Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: US Department of Health and Human Services Passed through the NC Department of Health and Human Services Program Name: Medical Assistance Program (Medicaid; Title XIX) AL #: 93.778 Finding: 2024-002 Untimely Review of SSI Terminations SIGNIFICANT DEFICENCY Eligibility Criteria: In accordance with the Medicaid Manual MA-3120, the State sends notification to the County when a participant is no longer eligible under a SSI determination. The County has a certain time period to initiate an ex-parte review to determine whether the recipient qualifies for Medicaid under any other coverage group, such as Family and Children's Medicaid, North Carolina Health Choice for Children, Work First Family Assistance, or Medicaid for the Aged, Blind and Disabled. This is a repeat finding from the immediate previous audit, 2023-001. Section III. Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (continued) We examined 60 cases from of a total of 1,127,837 Medicaid claims from the Medicaid beneficiary report provided by NC Department of Health and Human Services to re-determine eligibility. These findings are being reported with the financial statement audit as it relates to Medicaid administrative cost compliance audit. For those certifications/re-certifications there was a chance that information was not properly documented and reconciled to NC FAST and a participant could have been approved for benefits for which they were not eligible. Ineffective record keeping and ineffective case review process, incomplete documentation, and incorrect application of rules for purposes of determining eligibility. Files should be reviewed internally to ensure proper documentation is in place for eligibility. Workers should be retrained on what files should contain and the importance of complete and accurate record keeping. We recommend that all files include online verifications, documented resources of income and those amounts agree to information in NC FAST. The results found or documentation made in case notes should clearly indicate what actions were performed and the results of those actions. The County agrees with the finding. Please refer to the corrective action plan for details.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴US Department of Health and Human Services Passed through the NC Department of Health and Human Services Program Name: Medical Assistance Program (Medicaid; Title XIX) AL #: 93.778 Finding: 2024-001 Inaccurate Information Entry SIGNIFICANT DEFICENCY Eligibility Criteria: Condition: Questioned Costs: There were 2 errors discovered during our procedures that inaccurate information was entered when determining eligibility. There was no known affect to eligibility and there were no known questioned costs. In accordance with 42 CFR 435, documentation must be obtained as needed to determine if a recipient meets specific standards, and documentation must be maintained to support eligibility determinations. In accordance with 2 CFR 200, management should have an adequate system of internal controls procedures in place to ensure an applicant is properly determined or redetermined for benefits.Context: Effect: Identification of a repeat finding: Cause: Recommendation: Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: US Department of Health and Human Services Passed through the NC Department of Health and Human Services Program Name: Medical Assistance Program (Medicaid; Title XIX) AL #: 93.778 Finding: 2024-002 Untimely Review of SSI Terminations SIGNIFICANT DEFICENCY Eligibility Criteria: In accordance with the Medicaid Manual MA-3120, the State sends notification to the County when a participant is no longer eligible under a SSI determination. The County has a certain time period to initiate an ex-parte review to determine whether the recipient qualifies for Medicaid under any other coverage group, such as Family and Children's Medicaid, North Carolina Health Choice for Children, Work First Family Assistance, or Medicaid for the Aged, Blind and Disabled. This is a repeat finding from the immediate previous audit, 2023-001. Section III. Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (continued) We examined 60 cases from of a total of 1,127,837 Medicaid claims from the Medicaid beneficiary report provided by NC Department of Health and Human Services to re-determine eligibility. These findings are being reported with the financial statement audit as it relates to Medicaid administrative cost compliance audit. For those certifications/re-certifications there was a chance that information was not properly documented and reconciled to NC FAST and a participant could have been approved for benefits for which they were not eligible. Ineffective record keeping and ineffective case review process, incomplete documentation, and incorrect application of rules for purposes of determining eligibility. Files should be reviewed internally to ensure proper documentation is in place for eligibility. Workers should be retrained on what files should contain and the importance of complete and accurate record keeping. We recommend that all files include online verifications, documented resources of income and those amounts agree to information in NC FAST. The results found or documentation made in case notes should clearly indicate what actions were performed and the results of those actions. The County agrees with the finding. Please refer to the corrective action plan for details.
Finding: 2024-001 Name of contact person: Corrective Action: Proposed Completion Date: Finding: 2024-002 Name of contact person: Corrective Action: Proposed Completion Date: Section III Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs Management will review cases internally to ensure proper documentation is in place for eligibility. Staff will be provided with refresher training on what information should be included in case files and the importance of this being complete and accurate. Management will review and revise current procedures in place to ensure that all eligibility determination criteria is completed such as online verifications, documented sources of income/resources and amounts are accurately reflected and retained in the case file within the NC FAST Case Management System. Training will be completed by November 1, 2024 Lisa Chaney, Mandy Edwards, Nicole Victory and Debbie McGuire - Medicaid Supervisors Corrective actions for finding 2024-001 and 2024-002 also apply to the State Awards findings. Management will provide refresher training to all staff on what processes to follow when changes are reported to ensure accurate and timely review of all benefits. Management will review and revise current procedures in place to ensure that all eligibility determination criteria and documentation is completed timely and accurately reflected in the case file within the NC Fast Case Management System. Training will be completed by November 1, 2024
2023-001
Questioned Costs: Context: Effect: Cause: Recommendation: Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Program Name: Medical Assistance Program (Medicaid; Title XIX) AL #: 93.778 The County did not initiate ex-parte review timely, therefore, no eligibility review was completed in the required time period. The lack of follow up and certification lead to applicants receiving Medicaid benefits for which they were not eligible. The County agrees with the finding. Please refer to the corrective action plan for details. Any State communications related to applicants/beneficiaries should be shared with all areas from which the participant receives benefits. State files should be reviewed internally to ensure all actions have been properly closed and the corrective action has been taken. Workers should be retrained on what process needs to be followed when State communications are received. SIGNIFICANT DEFICENCY: Finding 2024-001 and 2024-002 also apply to State requirements and State Awards. Section IV. State Award Findings and Questioned Costs Ineffective communication between departments within the Department of Social Services. One area within DSS received State communications that applicants would no longer be eligible for SSI benefits and the County needed to conduct an ex-parte review. This information was not shared with other departments in DSS from which the recipient was also receiving benefits. There was no known affect to eligibility and there were no known questioned costs. We examined 60 cases from of a total of 1,127,837 Medicaid claims from the Medicaid beneficiary report provided by NC Department of Health and Human Services to re-determine eligibility. These findings are being reported with the financial statement audit as it relates to Medicaid administrative cost compliance audit. There were 2 applicants/beneficiaries not reviewed timely and determined to be eligible for Medicaid when their SSI benefits were terminated. Section III. Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (continued)
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Context: Effect: Identification of a repeat finding: Cause: Recommendation: Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: US Department of Health and Human Services Passed through the NC Department of Health and Human Services Program Name: Medical Assistance Program (Medicaid; Title XIX) AL #: 93.778 Finding: 2024-002 Untimely Review of SSI Terminations SIGNIFICANT DEFICENCY Eligibility Criteria: In accordance with the Medicaid Manual MA-3120, the State sends notification to the County when a participant is no longer eligible under a SSI determination. The County has a certain time period to initiate an ex-parte review to determine whether the recipient qualifies for Medicaid under any other coverage group, such as Family and Children's Medicaid, North Carolina Health Choice for Children, Work First Family Assistance, or Medicaid for the Aged, Blind and Disabled. This is a repeat finding from the immediate previous audit, 2023-001. Section III. Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (continued) We examined 60 cases from of a total of 1,127,837 Medicaid claims from the Medicaid beneficiary report provided by NC Department of Health and Human Services to re-determine eligibility. These findings are being reported with the financial statement audit as it relates to Medicaid administrative cost compliance audit. For those certifications/re-certifications there was a chance that information was not properly documented and reconciled to NC FAST and a participant could have been approved for benefits for which they were not eligible. Ineffective record keeping and ineffective case review process, incomplete documentation, and incorrect application of rules for purposes of determining eligibility. Files should be reviewed internally to ensure proper documentation is in place for eligibility. Workers should be retrained on what files should contain and the importance of complete and accurate record keeping. We recommend that all files include online verifications, documented resources of income and those amounts agree to information in NC FAST. The results found or documentation made in case notes should clearly indicate what actions were performed and the results of those actions. The County agrees with the finding. Please refer to the corrective action plan for details.Condition: Questioned Costs: Context: Effect: Cause: Recommendation: Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Program Name: Medical Assistance Program (Medicaid; Title XIX) AL #: 93.778 The County did not initiate ex-parte review timely, therefore, no eligibility review was completed in the required time period. The lack of follow up and certification lead to applicants receiving Medicaid benefits for which they were not eligible. The County agrees with the finding. Please refer to the corrective action plan for details. Any State communications related to applicants/beneficiaries should be shared with all areas from which the participant receives benefits. State files should be reviewed internally to ensure all actions have been properly closed and the corrective action has been taken. Workers should be retrained on what process needs to be followed when State communications are received. SIGNIFICANT DEFICENCY: Finding 2024-001 and 2024-002 also apply to State requirements and State Awards. Section IV. State Award Findings and Questioned Costs Ineffective communication between departments within the Department of Social Services. One area within DSS received State communications that applicants would no longer be eligible for SSI benefits and the County needed to conduct an ex-parte review. This information was not shared with other departments in DSS from which the recipient was also receiving benefits. There was no known affect to eligibility and there were no known questioned costs. We examined 60 cases from of a total of 1,127,837 Medicaid claims from the Medicaid beneficiary report provided by NC Department of Health and Human Services to re-determine eligibility. These findings are being reported with the financial statement audit as it relates to Medicaid administrative cost compliance audit. There were 2 applicants/beneficiaries not reviewed timely and determined to be eligible for Medicaid when their SSI benefits were terminated. Section III. Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (continued)
Finding: 2024-001 Name of contact person: Corrective Action: Proposed Completion Date: Finding: 2024-002 Name of contact person: Corrective Action: Proposed Completion Date: Section III Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs Management will review cases internally to ensure proper documentation is in place for eligibility. Staff will be provided with refresher training on what information should be included in case files and the importance of this being complete and accurate. Management will review and revise current procedures in place to ensure that all eligibility determination criteria is completed such as online verifications, documented sources of income/resources and amounts are accurately reflected and retained in the case file within the NC FAST Case Management System. Training will be completed by November 1, 2024 Lisa Chaney, Mandy Edwards, Nicole Victory and Debbie McGuire - Medicaid Supervisors Corrective actions for finding 2024-001 and 2024-002 also apply to the State Awards findings. Management will provide refresher training to all staff on what processes to follow when changes are reported to ensure accurate and timely review of all benefits. Management will review and revise current procedures in place to ensure that all eligibility determination criteria and documentation is completed timely and accurately reflected in the case file within the NC Fast Case Management System. Training will be completed by November 1, 2024
FAC accepted this audit on December 4, 2023 — management decision was due June 4, 2024.
Questioned Costs: There were 7 errors discovered during our procedures that inaccurate information was entered when determining eligibility. There was no known affect to eligibility and there were no known questioned costs. In accordance with 42 CFR 435, documentation must be obtained as needed to determine if a recipient meets specific standards, and documentation must be maintained to support eligibility determinations. In accordance with 2 CFR 200, management should have an adequate system of internal controls procedures in place to ensure an applicant is properly determined or redetermined for benefits. Context: Effect: Identification of a repeat finding: Cause: Recommendation: Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: The County agrees with the finding. Please refer to the corrective action plan for details.This is a repeat finding from the immediate previous audit, 2022-002. For those certifications/re-certifications there was a chance that information was not properly documented and reconciled to NC FAST and a participant could have been approved for benefits for which they were not eligible. Ineffective record keeping and ineffective case review process, incomplete documentation, and incorrect application of rules for purposes of determining eligibility. Files should be reviewed internally to ensure proper documentation is in place for eligibility. Workers should be retrained on what files should contain and the importance of complete and accurate record keeping. We recommend that all files include online verifications, documented resources of income and those amounts agree to information in NC FAST. The results found or documentation made in case notes should clearly indicate what actions were performed and the results of those actions. We examined 60 cases from of a total of 1,026,673 Medicaid claims from the Medicaid beneficiary report provided by NC Department of Health and Human Services to re-determine eligibility. These findings are being reported with the financial statement audit as it relates to Medicaid administrative cost compliance audit.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴US Department of Health and Human Services Passed through the NC Department of Health and Human Services Program Name: Medical Assistance Program (Medicaid; Title XIX) AL #: 93.778 Finding: 2023-001 Inaccurate Information Entry SIGNIFICANT DEFICENCY Eligibility Criteria: Condition: Questioned Costs: There were 7 errors discovered during our procedures that inaccurate information was entered when determining eligibility. There was no known affect to eligibility and there were no known questioned costs. In accordance with 42 CFR 435, documentation must be obtained as needed to determine if a recipient meets specific standards, and documentation must be maintained to support eligibility determinations. In accordance with 2 CFR 200, management should have an adequate system of internal controls procedures in place to ensure an applicant is properly determined or redetermined for benefits. Context: Effect: Identification of a repeat finding: Cause: Recommendation: Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: The County agrees with the finding. Please refer to the corrective action plan for details.This is a repeat finding from the immediate previous audit, 2022-002. For those certifications/re-certifications there was a chance that information was not properly documented and reconciled to NC FAST and a participant could have been approved for benefits for which they were not eligible. Ineffective record keeping and ineffective case review process, incomplete documentation, and incorrect application of rules for purposes of determining eligibility. Files should be reviewed internally to ensure proper documentation is in place for eligibility. Workers should be retrained on what files should contain and the importance of complete and accurate record keeping. We recommend that all files include online verifications, documented resources of income and those amounts agree to information in NC FAST. The results found or documentation made in case notes should clearly indicate what actions were performed and the results of those actions. We examined 60 cases from of a total of 1,026,673 Medicaid claims from the Medicaid beneficiary report provided by NC Department of Health and Human Services to re-determine eligibility. These findings are being reported with the financial statement audit as it relates to Medicaid administrative cost compliance audit.
Lisa Chaney, Mandy Edwards, Nicole Victory and Debbie McGuire Management will review cases internally to ensure proper documentation is in place for eligibility. Staff will be provided with refresher training on what information should be included in case files and the importance of this being complete and accurate. Management will review and revise current procedures in place to ensure that all eligibility determination criteria is completed such as online verifications, documented sources of income/resources and amounts are accurately reflected and retained in the case file within the NC FAST Case Management System. Training will be completed by November 17th, 2023
2022-002
Questioned Costs: Context: Effect: Cause: Ineffective record keeping and ineffective case review process, incomplete documentation, and incorrect application of rules for purposes of determining eligibility. For those certifications/re-certifications there was a chance that information was not properly documented and reconciled to NC FAST and a participant could have been approved for benefits for which they were not eligible. There was 2 errors discovered during our procedures that resources in the county documentation and those same resources contained in NC FAST were not the same amounts or files containing resources were not properly documented to be considered countable or non-countable. There was no known affect to eligibility and there were no known questioned costs. In accordance with Medicaid Manual MA-2230, Medicaid for Aged, Blind and Disabled case records should contain documentation that verifications were done in preparation of the application and these items will agree to reports in the NC FAST system. In this process, the countable resources should be calculated correctly and agree back to the amounts in the NC FAST system. Any items discovered in the verification process should be considered countable or noncountable resources and explained within the documentation. Section III. Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (continued) We examined 60 cases from of a total of 1,026,673 Medicaid claims from the Medicaid beneficiary report provided by NC Department of Health and Human Services to re-determine eligibility. These findings are being reported with the financial statement audit as it relates to Medicaid administrative cost compliance audit. Files should be reviewed internally to ensure proper documentation is in place for eligibility. Workers should be retrained on what files should contain and the importance of complete and accurate record keeping. We recommend that all files include online verifications, documented resources of income and those amounts agree to information in NC FAST. The results found or documentation made in case notes should clearly indicate what actions were performed and the results of those actions. The County agrees with the finding. Please refer to the corrective action plan for details.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴US Department of Health and Human Services Passed through the NC Department of Health and Human Services Program Name: Medical Assistance Program (Medicaid; Title XIX) AL #: 93.778 Finding: 2023-002 Inaccurate Resources Entry SIGNIFICANT DEFICENCY Eligibility Criteria: Condition: Questioned Costs: Context: Effect: Cause: Ineffective record keeping and ineffective case review process, incomplete documentation, and incorrect application of rules for purposes of determining eligibility. For those certifications/re-certifications there was a chance that information was not properly documented and reconciled to NC FAST and a participant could have been approved for benefits for which they were not eligible. There was 2 errors discovered during our procedures that resources in the county documentation and those same resources contained in NC FAST were not the same amounts or files containing resources were not properly documented to be considered countable or non-countable. There was no known affect to eligibility and there were no known questioned costs. In accordance with Medicaid Manual MA-2230, Medicaid for Aged, Blind and Disabled case records should contain documentation that verifications were done in preparation of the application and these items will agree to reports in the NC FAST system. In this process, the countable resources should be calculated correctly and agree back to the amounts in the NC FAST system. Any items discovered in the verification process should be considered countable or noncountable resources and explained within the documentation. Section III. Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (continued) We examined 60 cases from of a total of 1,026,673 Medicaid claims from the Medicaid beneficiary report provided by NC Department of Health and Human Services to re-determine eligibility. These findings are being reported with the financial statement audit as it relates to Medicaid administrative cost compliance audit. Files should be reviewed internally to ensure proper documentation is in place for eligibility. Workers should be retrained on what files should contain and the importance of complete and accurate record keeping. We recommend that all files include online verifications, documented resources of income and those amounts agree to information in NC FAST. The results found or documentation made in case notes should clearly indicate what actions were performed and the results of those actions. The County agrees with the finding. Please refer to the corrective action plan for details.
Lisa Chaney, Mandy Edwards, Nicole Victory and Debbie McGuire Management will review cases internally to ensure proper documentation is in place for eligibility. Staff will be provided with refresher training on what information should be included in case files and the importance of this being complete and accurate. Management will review and revise current procedures in place to ensure that all eligibility determination criteria is completed such as online verifications, documented resources and amounts are accurately reflected and retained in the case file within the NC FAST Case Management System. Training will be completed by November 17th, 2023
2022-003
US Department of Health and Human Services Passed through the NC Department of Health and Human Services Program Name: Medical Assistance Program (Medicaid; Title XIX) AL #: 93.778 Finding: 2023-003 Inadequate Request for Information SIGNIFICANT DEFICENCY Eligibility Criteria: In accordance with 42 CFR 435, documentation must be obtained as needed to determine if a recipient meets specific standards, and documentation must be maintained to support eligibility determinations. Electronic matches are required at applications and redeterminations. There were 1 errors discovered during our procedures that inadequate information was requested at applications and/or redeterminations. There was no known affect to eligibility and there were no known questioned costs. We examined 60 cases from of a total of 1,026,673 Medicaid claims from the Medicaid beneficiary report provided by NC Department of Health and Human Services to re-determine eligibility. These findings are being reported with the financial statement audit as it relates to Medicaid administrative cost compliance audit. For those certifications/re-certifications there was a chance that information was not properly documented and reconciled to NC FAST and applicants could have been approved for benefits for which they were not eligible. Ineffective record keeping and ineffective case review process, incomplete documentation, and incorrect application of rules for purposes of determining eligibility. Files should be reviewed internally to ensure proper documentation is in place for eligibility. Workers should be retrained on what files should contain and the importance of complete and accurate record keeping. We recommend that all files include online verifications, documented resources and income and those amounts agree to information in NC FAST. The results found or documentation made in case notes should clearly indicate what actions were performed and the results of those actions. The County agrees with the finding. Please refer to the corrective action plan for details.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴US Department of Health and Human Services Passed through the NC Department of Health and Human Services Program Name: Medical Assistance Program (Medicaid; Title XIX) AL #: 93.778 Finding: 2023-003 Inadequate Request for Information SIGNIFICANT DEFICENCY Eligibility Criteria: In accordance with 42 CFR 435, documentation must be obtained as needed to determine if a recipient meets specific standards, and documentation must be maintained to support eligibility determinations. Electronic matches are required at applications and redeterminations. There were 1 errors discovered during our procedures that inadequate information was requested at applications and/or redeterminations. There was no known affect to eligibility and there were no known questioned costs. We examined 60 cases from of a total of 1,026,673 Medicaid claims from the Medicaid beneficiary report provided by NC Department of Health and Human Services to re-determine eligibility. These findings are being reported with the financial statement audit as it relates to Medicaid administrative cost compliance audit. For those certifications/re-certifications there was a chance that information was not properly documented and reconciled to NC FAST and applicants could have been approved for benefits for which they were not eligible. Ineffective record keeping and ineffective case review process, incomplete documentation, and incorrect application of rules for purposes of determining eligibility. Files should be reviewed internally to ensure proper documentation is in place for eligibility. Workers should be retrained on what files should contain and the importance of complete and accurate record keeping. We recommend that all files include online verifications, documented resources and income and those amounts agree to information in NC FAST. The results found or documentation made in case notes should clearly indicate what actions were performed and the results of those actions. The County agrees with the finding. Please refer to the corrective action plan for details.
Lisa Chaney, Mandy Edwards, Nicole Victory and Debbie McGuire Management will review cases internally to ensure proper documentation is in place for eligibility. Staff will be provided with refresher training on what information should be included in case files and the importance of this being complete and accurate. Management will review and revise current procedures in place to ensure that all eligibility determination criteria is completed such as online verifications, documented sources of income/resources and amounts are accurately reflected and retained in the case file within the NC FAST Case Management System. Training will be completed by November 17th, 2023
2022-005
US Department of Health and Human Services Passed through the NC Department of Health and Human Services Program Name: Medical Assistance Program (Medicaid; Title XIX) AL #: 93.778 Finding: 2023-004 Non-cooperation with Child Support Procedures SIGNIFICANT DEFICENCY Criteria: In accordance with the Medicaid Manual MA-3365, all Medicaid cases should be evaluated and referred to the Child Support Enforcement Agency (IV-D). The Child Support Enforcement Agency (IV-D) can assist the family in obtaining financial and/or medical support or medical support payments from the child’s noncustodial parent. Cooperation requirement with Social Services and Child Support Agencies must be met or good cause for not cooperating must be established when determining Medicaid eligibility. There were 5 errors discovered during our procedures that referrals between Department of Social Services (DSS) and Child Support Agencies were not properly made. There was no known affect to eligibility and there were no known questioned costs. We examined 60 cases from of a total of 1,026,673 Medicaid claims from the Medicaid beneficiary report provided by NC Department of Health and Human Services to re-determine eligibility. These findings are being reported with the financial statement audit as it relates to Medicaid administrative cost compliance audit. For those certifications/re-certifications there was a chance that information was not properly documented and reconciled to NC FAST and applicants could have been approved for benefits for which they were not eligible. Error in reading the ACTS report and/or ineffective case review process. Files should be reviewed internally to ensure proper information is in place and necessary procedures are taken when determining eligibility. The results found or documentation made in case notes should clearly indicate what actions were performed and the results of those actions. The County agrees with the finding. See Corrective Action Plan in the following section.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴US Department of Health and Human Services Passed through the NC Department of Health and Human Services Program Name: Medical Assistance Program (Medicaid; Title XIX) AL #: 93.778 Finding: 2023-004 Non-cooperation with Child Support Procedures SIGNIFICANT DEFICENCY Criteria: In accordance with the Medicaid Manual MA-3365, all Medicaid cases should be evaluated and referred to the Child Support Enforcement Agency (IV-D). The Child Support Enforcement Agency (IV-D) can assist the family in obtaining financial and/or medical support or medical support payments from the child’s noncustodial parent. Cooperation requirement with Social Services and Child Support Agencies must be met or good cause for not cooperating must be established when determining Medicaid eligibility. There were 5 errors discovered during our procedures that referrals between Department of Social Services (DSS) and Child Support Agencies were not properly made. There was no known affect to eligibility and there were no known questioned costs. We examined 60 cases from of a total of 1,026,673 Medicaid claims from the Medicaid beneficiary report provided by NC Department of Health and Human Services to re-determine eligibility. These findings are being reported with the financial statement audit as it relates to Medicaid administrative cost compliance audit. For those certifications/re-certifications there was a chance that information was not properly documented and reconciled to NC FAST and applicants could have been approved for benefits for which they were not eligible. Error in reading the ACTS report and/or ineffective case review process. Files should be reviewed internally to ensure proper information is in place and necessary procedures are taken when determining eligibility. The results found or documentation made in case notes should clearly indicate what actions were performed and the results of those actions. The County agrees with the finding. See Corrective Action Plan in the following section.
Lisa Chaney, Nicole Victory and Debbie McGuire Management will provide refresher training to staff on what process to follow in regards to making Child Support IV-D referrals. Management will review and revise current procedures in place to ensure that all required referrals are completed, accurate, sent timely and reflected in the case file within the NC Fast Case Management System Training will be completed by November 17th, 2023
FAC accepted this audit on November 14, 2022 — management decision was due May 14, 2023.
There were 7 errors discovered during our procedures that inaccurate information was entered when determining eligibility.Questioned Costs: There was no known affect to eligibility and there were no known questioned costs.Context: We examined 60 of a total 1,085,259 Medicaid claims from the Medicaid Beneficiary report provided by NC Department of Health and Human Services to re-determine eligibility. These findings are being reported with the financial statement audit as it relates to Medicaid administrative cost compliance audit.Effect: For those certifications/re-certifications there was a chance that information was not properly documented and reconciled to NC FAST and a participant could have been approved for benefits for which they were not eligible.Cause: Ineffective record keeping and ineffective case review process, incomplete documentation, and incorrect application of rules for purposes of determining eligibility.Recommendation: Files should be reviewed internally to ensure proper documentation is in place for eligibility. Workers should be retrained on what files should contain and the importance of complete and accurate record keeping. We recommend that all files include online verifications, documented resources of income and those amounts agree to information in NC FAST. The results found or documentation made in case notes should clearly indicate what actions were performed and the results of those actions.Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: The County agrees with the finding. Please refer to the corrective action plan for details.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴US Department of Health and Human ServicesPassed through the NC Department of Health and Human ServicesProgram Name: Medical Assistance Program (Medicaid; Title XIX)AL #: 93.778Finding: 2022-002 Inaccurate Information EntrySIGNIFICANT DEFICENCYEligibilityCriteria: In accordance with 42 CFR 435, documentation must be obtained as needed to determine if a recipient meets specific standards, and documentation must be maintained to support eligibility determinations. In accordance with 2 CFR 200, management should have an adequate system of internal controls procedures in place to ensure an applicant is properly determined or redetermined for benefits.Condition: There were 7 errors discovered during our procedures that inaccurate information was entered when determining eligibility.Questioned Costs: There was no known affect to eligibility and there were no known questioned costs.Context: We examined 60 of a total 1,085,259 Medicaid claims from the Medicaid Beneficiary report provided by NC Department of Health and Human Services to re-determine eligibility. These findings are being reported with the financial statement audit as it relates to Medicaid administrative cost compliance audit.Effect: For those certifications/re-certifications there was a chance that information was not properly documented and reconciled to NC FAST and a participant could have been approved for benefits for which they were not eligible.Cause: Ineffective record keeping and ineffective case review process, incomplete documentation, and incorrect application of rules for purposes of determining eligibility.Recommendation: Files should be reviewed internally to ensure proper documentation is in place for eligibility. Workers should be retrained on what files should contain and the importance of complete and accurate record keeping. We recommend that all files include online verifications, documented resources of income and those amounts agree to information in NC FAST. The results found or documentation made in case notes should clearly indicate what actions were performed and the results of those actions.Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: The County agrees with the finding. Please refer to the corrective action plan for details.
Finding: 2022-002Name of contact person: Lisa Chaney, Mandy Edwards, Nicole Victory and Debbie McGuireCorrective Action: "Management will review cases internally to ensure proper documentation is in place for eligibility. Staff will be provided with refresher training on what information should be included in case files and the importance of this being complete and accurate. Management will review and revise current procedures in place to ensure that all eligibility determination criteria is completed such as online verifications, documented sources of income/resources and amounts are accurately reflected and retained in the case file within the NC FAST Case Management System. "Proposed Completion Date: Training will be completed by October 28th, 2022
There was 3 errors discovered during our procedures that resources in the county documentation and those same resources contained in NC FAST were not the same amounts or files containing resources were not properly documented to be considered countable or non-countable.Questioned Costs: There was no known affect to eligibility and there were no known questioned costs.Context: We examined 60 of a total 1,085,259 Medicaid claims from the Medicaid Beneficiary report provided by NC Department of Health and Human Services to re-determine eligibility. These findings are being reported with the financial statement audit as it relates to Medicaid administrative cost compliance audit.Effect: For those certifications/re-certifications there was a chance that information was not properly documented and reconciled to NC FAST and a participant could have been approved for benefits for which they were not eligible.Cause: Ineffective record keeping and ineffective case review process, incomplete documentation, and incorrect application of rules for purposes of determining eligibility.Recommendation: Files should be reviewed internally to ensure proper documentation is in place for eligibility. Workers should be retrained on what files should contain and the importance of complete and accurate record keeping. We recommend that all files include online verifications, documented resources of income and those amounts agree to information in NC FAST. The results found or documentation made in case notes should clearly indicate what actions were performed and the results of those actions.Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: The County agrees with the finding. Please refer to the corrective action plan for details.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴US Department of Health and Human ServicesPassed through the NC Department of Health and Human ServicesProgram Name: Medical Assistance Program (Medicaid; Title XIX)AL #: 93.778Finding: 2022-003 Inaccurate Resources EntrySIGNIFICANT DEFICENCYEligibilityCriteria: "In accordance with Medicaid Manual MA-2230, Medicaid for Aged, Blind and Disabled case records should contain documentation that verifications were donein preparation of the application and these items will agree to reports in the NC FAST system. In this process, the countable resources should be calculated correctly and agree back to the amounts in the NC FAST system. Any items discovered in the verification process should be considered countable or noncountable resources and explained within the documentation."Condition: There was 3 errors discovered during our procedures that resources in the county documentation and those same resources contained in NC FAST were not the same amounts or files containing resources were not properly documented to be considered countable or non-countable.Questioned Costs: There was no known affect to eligibility and there were no known questioned costs.Context: We examined 60 of a total 1,085,259 Medicaid claims from the Medicaid Beneficiary report provided by NC Department of Health and Human Services to re-determine eligibility. These findings are being reported with the financial statement audit as it relates to Medicaid administrative cost compliance audit.Effect: For those certifications/re-certifications there was a chance that information was not properly documented and reconciled to NC FAST and a participant could have been approved for benefits for which they were not eligible.Cause: Ineffective record keeping and ineffective case review process, incomplete documentation, and incorrect application of rules for purposes of determining eligibility.Recommendation: Files should be reviewed internally to ensure proper documentation is in place for eligibility. Workers should be retrained on what files should contain and the importance of complete and accurate record keeping. We recommend that all files include online verifications, documented resources of income and those amounts agree to information in NC FAST. The results found or documentation made in case notes should clearly indicate what actions were performed and the results of those actions.Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: The County agrees with the finding. Please refer to the corrective action plan for details.
Finding: 2022-003Name of contact person: Lisa Chaney, Mandy Edwards, Nicole Victory and Debbie McGuireCorrective Action: "Management will review cases internally to ensure proper documentation is in place for eligibility. Staff will be provided with refresher training on what information should be included in case files and the importance of this being complete and accurate. Management will review and revise current procedures in place to ensure that all eligibility determination criteria is completed such as online verifications, documented resources and amounts are accurately reflected and retained in the case file within the NC FAST Case Management System. "Proposed Completion Date: Training will be completed by October 28th, 2022
1 applicant was not reviewed timely and determined to be eligible for Medicaid when their SSI benefits were terminated.Questioned Costs: There was no known affect to eligibility and there were no known questioned costs..Context: We examined 60 of a total 1,085,259 Medicaid claims from the Medicaid Beneficiary report provided by NC Department of Health and Human Services to re-determine eligibility. These findings are being reported with the financial statement audit as it relates to Medicaid administrative cost compliance audit.Effect: The County did not initiate ex parte review timely, therefore, no eligibility review was completed in the required time period. The lack of follow up and certification lead to applicants receiving Medicaid benefits for which they were not eligible.Cause: Ineffective communication between departments within the Department of Social Services. One area within DSS received State communications that applicants would no longer be eligible for SSI benefits and the County needed to conduct an application process. This information was not shared with other departments in DSS from which the recipient was also receiving benefits.Recommendation: Any State communications related to applicants? benefits received by any DSS department should be shared with all areas from which the participant receives benefits. State files should be reviewed internally to ensure all actions have been properly closed and the corrective action has been taken. Workers should be retrained on what process needs to be followed when State communications are received.Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: The County agrees with the finding. Please refer to the corrective action plan for details.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴US Department of Health and Human ServicesPassed through the NC Department of Health and Human ServicesProgram Name: Medical Assistance Program (Medicaid; Title XIX)AL #: 93.778Finding: 2022-004 Untimely Review of SSI TerminationSIGNIFICANT DEFICENCYEligibilityCriteria: In accordance with the Medicaid Manual MA-3120, the State sends notification to the County when a participant is no longer eligible under Supplemental Security Income (SSI) determination, the County is required to initiate the ex parte review within 5 workdays of the date the termination appears on the SSI Termination Report, and complete the redetermination within 4 months of the month the case appears on the SSI Termination Report and notify the recipient about applicant's ongoing eligibility for Medicaid.Condition: 1 applicant was not reviewed timely and determined to be eligible for Medicaid when their SSI benefits were terminated.Questioned Costs: There was no known affect to eligibility and there were no known questioned costs..Context: We examined 60 of a total 1,085,259 Medicaid claims from the Medicaid Beneficiary report provided by NC Department of Health and Human Services to re-determine eligibility. These findings are being reported with the financial statement audit as it relates to Medicaid administrative cost compliance audit.Effect: The County did not initiate ex parte review timely, therefore, no eligibility review was completed in the required time period. The lack of follow up and certification lead to applicants receiving Medicaid benefits for which they were not eligible.Cause: Ineffective communication between departments within the Department of Social Services. One area within DSS received State communications that applicants would no longer be eligible for SSI benefits and the County needed to conduct an application process. This information was not shared with other departments in DSS from which the recipient was also receiving benefits.Recommendation: Any State communications related to applicants? benefits received by any DSS department should be shared with all areas from which the participant receives benefits. State files should be reviewed internally to ensure all actions have been properly closed and the corrective action has been taken. Workers should be retrained on what process needs to be followed when State communications are received.Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: The County agrees with the finding. Please refer to the corrective action plan for details.
Finding: 2022-004Name of contact person: Lisa Chaney, Mandy Edwards, Nicole Victory and Debbie McGuireCorrective Action: "Management will provide refresher training to all staff on what processes to follow when changes are reported to ensure accurate and timely review of all benefits. Management will review and revise current procedures in place to ensure that all eligibility determination criteria and documentation is completed timely and accurately reflected in the case file within the NC Fast Case Management System. "Proposed Completion Date: Training will be completed by October 28th, 2022
There were 1 errors discovered during our procedures that inadequate information was requested at applications and/or redeterminations.Questioned Costs: There was no known affect to eligibility and there were no known questioned costs.Context: We examined 60 of a total 1,085,259 Medicaid claims from the Medicaid Beneficiary report provided by NC Department of Health and Human Services to re-determine eligibility. These findings are being reported with the financial statement audit as it relates to Medicaid administrative cost compliance audit.Effect: For those certifications/re-certifications there was a chance that information was not properly documented and reconciled to NC FAST and applicants could have been approved for benefits for which they were not eligible.Cause: Ineffective record keeping and ineffective case review process, incomplete documentation, and incorrect application of rules for purposes of determining eligibility.Recommendation: Files should be reviewed internally to ensure proper documentation is in place for eligibility. Workers should be retrained on what files should contain and the importance of complete and accurate record keeping. We recommend that all files include online verifications, documented resources and income and those amounts agree to information in NC FAST. The results found or documentation made in case notes should clearly indicate what actions were performed and the results of those actions.Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: The County agrees with the finding. Please refer to the corrective action plan for details.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴US Department of Health and Human ServicesPassed through the NC Department of Health and Human ServicesProgram Name: Medical Assistance Program (Medicaid; Title XIX)AL #: 93.778Finding: 2022-005 Inadequate Request for InformationSIGNIFICANT DEFICENCYEligibilityCriteria: In accordance with 42 CFR 435, documentation must be obtained as needed to determine if a recipient meets specific standards, and documentation must be maintained to support eligibility determinations. Electronic matches are required at applications and redeterminations.Condition: There were 1 errors discovered during our procedures that inadequate information was requested at applications and/or redeterminations.Questioned Costs: There was no known affect to eligibility and there were no known questioned costs.Context: We examined 60 of a total 1,085,259 Medicaid claims from the Medicaid Beneficiary report provided by NC Department of Health and Human Services to re-determine eligibility. These findings are being reported with the financial statement audit as it relates to Medicaid administrative cost compliance audit.Effect: For those certifications/re-certifications there was a chance that information was not properly documented and reconciled to NC FAST and applicants could have been approved for benefits for which they were not eligible.Cause: Ineffective record keeping and ineffective case review process, incomplete documentation, and incorrect application of rules for purposes of determining eligibility.Recommendation: Files should be reviewed internally to ensure proper documentation is in place for eligibility. Workers should be retrained on what files should contain and the importance of complete and accurate record keeping. We recommend that all files include online verifications, documented resources and income and those amounts agree to information in NC FAST. The results found or documentation made in case notes should clearly indicate what actions were performed and the results of those actions.Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: The County agrees with the finding. Please refer to the corrective action plan for details.
Finding: 2022-005Name of contact person: Lisa Chaney, Mandy Edwards, Nicole Victory and Debbie McGuireCorrective Action: "Management will review cases internally to ensure proper documentation is in place for eligibility. Staff will be provided with refresher training on what information should be included in case files and the importance of this being complete and accurate. Management will review and revise current procedures in place to ensure that all eligibility determination criteria is completed such as online verifications, documented sources of income/resources and amounts are accurately reflected and retained in the case file within the NC FAST Case Management System. "Proposed Completion Date: Training will be completed by October 28th, 2022
There were 10 errors discovered during our procedures that the family assistance unit was determined incorrectly.Questioned Costs: There was no known affect to eligibility and there were no known questioned costs.Context: We examined 12 cases from 113 IV-E Foster Care Assistance applicants to re-determine eligibility. These findings are being reported with the financial statement audit a it relates to IV-E Foster Care administrative costs compliance audit.Effect: For those eligibility determination and re-determination, there was a chance that information was not properly documented and reconciled to North Carolina Families Accessing Services through Technology (NCFAST) and a participant could have been approved for benefits for which they were not eligible.Cause: Rockingham started to use NC FAST for the Child Welfare as a pilot county, the system was initially not designed intuitively or in a way that was easy to use. There were multiple system issues in the area of FC Financials (including issues with printed forms & documentation) until the Fund Eligibility process was resolved in January of 2020, along with a system update completed in November of 2020 to provide the ability for users to now reassess the CW Fund Eligibility. Due to the system functionality issues, the case workers were not able to enter and document the household relationship properly.Recommendation: Workers should be retrained on NCFAST functions to ensure accurate and complete information is entered into system. Files should be reviewed internally to ensure proper documentation is in place for eligibility.Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: The county agrees with the finding. Please refer to the corrective action plan for details.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴U.S. Department of Health and Human ServicesPassed through the NC Department of Health and Human ServicesProgram Name: IV-E Foster Care and Adoption Assistance ClusterAL #: 93.658, 93.659Finding: 2022-006 Incorrect Family Assistance Unit DeterminationSIGNIFICANT DEFICENCYReportingCriteria: In accordance with the Child Welfare Manual, Foster Care Funding Appendix 3.5, The composition of the Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) family assistance unit must be determined first in establishing whether the child is financially needy. The family assistance unit is defined as a group of individuals whose income, resources, and needs are considered as a unit for purposes of determining AFDC eligibility. It consists of the child, natural or adoptive parents and the blood or adoptive siblings living in the same household. If the child lives with a specified relative other than a parent, the family unit will consist of only the child and any siblings that also live with the same specified relative.Condition: There were 10 errors discovered during our procedures that the family assistance unit was determined incorrectly.Questioned Costs: There was no known affect to eligibility and there were no known questioned costs.Context: We examined 12 cases from 113 IV-E Foster Care Assistance applicants to re-determine eligibility. These findings are being reported with the financial statement audit a it relates to IV-E Foster Care administrative costs compliance audit.Effect: For those eligibility determination and re-determination, there was a chance that information was not properly documented and reconciled to North Carolina Families Accessing Services through Technology (NCFAST) and a participant could have been approved for benefits for which they were not eligible.Cause: Rockingham started to use NC FAST for the Child Welfare as a pilot county, the system was initially not designed intuitively or in a way that was easy to use. There were multiple system issues in the area of FC Financials (including issues with printed forms & documentation) until the Fund Eligibility process was resolved in January of 2020, along with a system update completed in November of 2020 to provide the ability for users to now reassess the CW Fund Eligibility. Due to the system functionality issues, the case workers were not able to enter and document the household relationship properly.Recommendation: Workers should be retrained on NCFAST functions to ensure accurate and complete information is entered into system. Files should be reviewed internally to ensure proper documentation is in place for eligibility.Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: The county agrees with the finding. Please refer to the corrective action plan for details.
Finding: 2022-006Name of contact person: Felissa H. Ferrell, Cathy MurrayCorrective Action: "The functionality of the system does not connect the child to the other siblings when the 5120 is keyed in the NC FAST System. When the social worker keys in the relationships of the family members in the household, they establish each parent and child, however, the system does not connect the sibling to the other siblings. If a paper 5120 were to be utilized, this would not be an issue. Apparently, with the recent NC FAST System updates, in order for all the siblings to show up on the 5120, it will now require the worker to establish the children to parent, then they will have to establish a relationship to each sibling and/or other members in the household, connecting them all together. This will require additonal data entries. It appears the system was intuitively doing this when connected with the EB NC FAST system however, the upgrades and separation has now made this not function.The Quality Assurance Social Work Specialist will commence a training with the supervisors and CPS workers, who complete the 5120, to ensure the staff understand the extra steps they are required to complete in the NC FAST system. The Quality Assurance Social Work Specialist will review the 5120s to ensure that the FAU is populating correctly. If the additional steps do not show the 5120 populating correctly, then a NC FAST Help Ticket will be generated, likely a level 3, which will require a patch. "Proposed Completion Date: Training will be completed by October 28th, 2022
FAC accepted this audit on January 3, 2021 — management decision was due July 3, 2021.
Information on the federal program: Medicaid Cluster (Medicaid), CFDA 93.778, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, passed through the N.C Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Medical Assistance. Criteria or specific requirement: Per the North Carolina Medicaid Assistance Program (Medicaid; Title XIX) Compliance Supplement and the DSS manuals (Aged, Blind and Disabled manual, Family and Children Medicaid manual and the Integrated Policy manual), case files for individuals or families receiving assistance are required to retain documentation to evidence appropriate eligibility determination, including: ? accurate record of household members and relationships ? accurate computation of countable income ? verification of earned income ? verification of unearned income Conditions: We noted that in two instances, the case record did not contain an appropriate income conversion and computation in accordance with policy manuals. In four instances, we noted that SOLQ OVS/ OLV, Bendex OVS/OLV, SDX OVS, ESC OVS, and ACTS OVS were not completed to verify the individual?s unearned income. In three instances, we noted that household and relationship information on the image documents was incorrectly entered into NC FAST. In two instances, we noted that the Employment Security Commission (ESC) OVS was not completed to verify the individual?s earned income. In two instances, we noted the total countable income was not recorded accurately into NC FAST based upon documentation in the case record. Context: We sampled 93 participants from a total population of 1,889,126 participants. We noted the above conditions in 8 of the 93 case files inspected. Effect: Case files not containing all required documentation result in a risk that the County could provide services to individuals not eligible to receive such services or that such services could be denied to eligible individuals. Subsequent to being notified that required documentation had not been retained in case files, the County was able obtain documentation to substantiate that the applicants tested were eligible to receive benefits. Cause: The County did not retain required documentation in case files at the time eligibility was determined. Recommendation: We recommend that the County train and monitor employees on the eligibility determination process. We also recommend the County review and amend current policy and procedures in place to ensure that all eligibility determination documentation is completed and retained by the County.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Information on the federal program: Medicaid Cluster (Medicaid), CFDA 93.778, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, passed through the N.C Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Medical Assistance. Criteria or specific requirement: Per the North Carolina Medicaid Assistance Program (Medicaid; Title XIX) Compliance Supplement and the DSS manuals (Aged, Blind and Disabled manual, Family and Children Medicaid manual and the Integrated Policy manual), case files for individuals or families receiving assistance are required to retain documentation to evidence appropriate eligibility determination, including: ? accurate record of household members and relationships ? accurate computation of countable income ? verification of earned income ? verification of unearned income Conditions: We noted that in two instances, the case record did not contain an appropriate income conversion and computation in accordance with policy manuals. In four instances, we noted that SOLQ OVS/ OLV, Bendex OVS/OLV, SDX OVS, ESC OVS, and ACTS OVS were not completed to verify the individual?s unearned income. In three instances, we noted that household and relationship information on the image documents was incorrectly entered into NC FAST. In two instances, we noted that the Employment Security Commission (ESC) OVS was not completed to verify the individual?s earned income. In two instances, we noted the total countable income was not recorded accurately into NC FAST based upon documentation in the case record. Context: We sampled 93 participants from a total population of 1,889,126 participants. We noted the above conditions in 8 of the 93 case files inspected. Effect: Case files not containing all required documentation result in a risk that the County could provide services to individuals not eligible to receive such services or that such services could be denied to eligible individuals. Subsequent to being notified that required documentation had not been retained in case files, the County was able obtain documentation to substantiate that the applicants tested were eligible to receive benefits. Cause: The County did not retain required documentation in case files at the time eligibility was determined. Recommendation: We recommend that the County train and monitor employees on the eligibility determination process. We also recommend the County review and amend current policy and procedures in place to ensure that all eligibility determination documentation is completed and retained by the County.
2020-002 ? (Medicaid) Significant Deficiency over Eligibility: Failure to retain required documentation in case files at the time eligibility was determined. Rockingham County management concurs with the finding and recommendation. CORRECTIVE ACTION PLANNED: Management will provide additional training and subsequently monitor employees on the eligibility determination process. Management will review and revise current procedures in place to ensure that all eligibility determination documentation is completed and retained in the case file or in the NCFast Case Management System. Training will include appropriate income conversion and computation in accordance with policy manuals, OVS completion to verify individuals? earned and/or unearned income, correctly entering household and relationship information into NCFast, and ensuring that total countable income information in the case file matches information entered into NCFast. Second-party reviews will be conducted to monitor the employees? compliance with policy requirements. The above conditions were noted as technical errors as, subsequent to being notified that the required documentation could not be locate in the case file, the County was able to obtain documentation to substantiate that the applicants tested were still eligible to receive benefits. CONTACT PERSON(S) RESPONSIBLE FOR CORRECTIVE ACTION: Wanda Coles, IMC Supervisor; Kathy Hopkins, IMC Lead Worker; Lisa Chaney, IMC Supervisor; Alyssa Edwards, IMC Lead Worker; Mandy Edwards, IMC Supervisor; Brooke Doolin, IMC Lead Worker; Tammy McDaniel, Quality Assurance Specialist; Mary Bocanegra, Quality Assurance Specialist ANTICIPATED COMPLETION DATE: 2/1/2021 and Ongoing Felissa H. Ferrell, Director
2019-004
FAC accepted this audit on January 2, 2020 — management decision was due July 2, 2020.
Information on the federal program: Medicaid Cluster (Medicaid), CFDA 93.778, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, passed through the N.C Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Medical Assistance. Criteria or specific requirement: Per the North Carolina Medicaid Assistance Program (Medicaid; Title XIX) Compliance Supplement and the DSS manuals (Aged, Blind and Disabled manual, Family and Children Medicaid manual and the Integrated Policy manual), case files for individuals or families receiving assistance are required to retain documentation to evidence appropriate eligibility determination, including: ? verifications of United States citizenship ? verifications of North Carolina State Residency ? accurate record of household members and relationships ? verification of social security number ? verification of real property ownership ? accurate computation of countable income ? verification of earned income ? verification of unearned income ? documentation supporting the use of forced eligibility Conditions: We noted that in one instance the case record did not contain documentation evidencing that tax and Register of Deeds? records were checked to verify whether the individual owns property. In ten instances, the case record did not contain evidence that SOLIQ was completed or manual documentation obtained to verify the individuals citizenship/ alien status. In seven instances, the case record did not contain evidence of household and relationship information to verify household composition. In nine instances, the Employment Security Commission (ESC) OVS was not completed to verify the individual?s earned income. In nine instances, SOLQ OVS/ OLV, Bendex OVS/OLV, SDX OVS, ESC OVS, and ACTS OVS were not completed to verify the individual?s unearned income. In ten instances, the case record did not contain evidence that the State Online Query OVS (SOLQ) was completed to verify the individual?s Social Security Number (SSN). In one instance, the case record did not contain necessary documentation and approvals to determine appropriate use of forced eligibility. In seven instances, the case record did not contain an appropriate income conversion and computation in accordance with policy manuals. In twelve instances, the total countable income was not recorded accurately into NC FAST based upon documentation in the case record. Context: We sampled 93 payments from a total population of 2,026,496 payments made to the participants during the fiscal year. We noted the above condition in 25 of the 93 case files inspected for applicable payments. Effect: Case files not containing all required documentation result in a risk that the County could provide services to individuals not eligible to receive such services or that such services could be denied to eligible individuals. Subsequent to being notified that required documentation had not been retained in case files, the County was able obtain documentation to substantiate that the applicants tested were eligible to receive benefits. Cause: The County did not retain required documentation in case files at the time eligibility was determined. Recommendation: We recommend that the County train and monitor employees on the eligibility determination process. We also recommend the County review and amend current policy and procedures in place to ensure that all eligibility determination documentation is completed and retained by the County.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Information on the federal program: Medicaid Cluster (Medicaid), CFDA 93.778, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, passed through the N.C Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Medical Assistance. Criteria or specific requirement: Per the North Carolina Medicaid Assistance Program (Medicaid; Title XIX) Compliance Supplement and the DSS manuals (Aged, Blind and Disabled manual, Family and Children Medicaid manual and the Integrated Policy manual), case files for individuals or families receiving assistance are required to retain documentation to evidence appropriate eligibility determination, including: ? verifications of United States citizenship ? verifications of North Carolina State Residency ? accurate record of household members and relationships ? verification of social security number ? verification of real property ownership ? accurate computation of countable income ? verification of earned income ? verification of unearned income ? documentation supporting the use of forced eligibility Conditions: We noted that in one instance the case record did not contain documentation evidencing that tax and Register of Deeds? records were checked to verify whether the individual owns property. In ten instances, the case record did not contain evidence that SOLIQ was completed or manual documentation obtained to verify the individuals citizenship/ alien status. In seven instances, the case record did not contain evidence of household and relationship information to verify household composition. In nine instances, the Employment Security Commission (ESC) OVS was not completed to verify the individual?s earned income. In nine instances, SOLQ OVS/ OLV, Bendex OVS/OLV, SDX OVS, ESC OVS, and ACTS OVS were not completed to verify the individual?s unearned income. In ten instances, the case record did not contain evidence that the State Online Query OVS (SOLQ) was completed to verify the individual?s Social Security Number (SSN). In one instance, the case record did not contain necessary documentation and approvals to determine appropriate use of forced eligibility. In seven instances, the case record did not contain an appropriate income conversion and computation in accordance with policy manuals. In twelve instances, the total countable income was not recorded accurately into NC FAST based upon documentation in the case record. Context: We sampled 93 payments from a total population of 2,026,496 payments made to the participants during the fiscal year. We noted the above condition in 25 of the 93 case files inspected for applicable payments. Effect: Case files not containing all required documentation result in a risk that the County could provide services to individuals not eligible to receive such services or that such services could be denied to eligible individuals. Subsequent to being notified that required documentation had not been retained in case files, the County was able obtain documentation to substantiate that the applicants tested were eligible to receive benefits. Cause: The County did not retain required documentation in case files at the time eligibility was determined. Recommendation: We recommend that the County train and monitor employees on the eligibility determination process. We also recommend the County review and amend current policy and procedures in place to ensure that all eligibility determination documentation is completed and retained by the County.
2019-004 ? (Medicaid) Failure to retain documentation to evidence appropriate eligibility determination verifications. Rockingham County management concurs with the finding and recommendation. CORRECTIVE ACTION PLANNED: Management will train and monitor employees on the eligibility determination process. Management will review and revise current procedures in place to ensure that all eligibility determination documentation is completed and retained in the case file or in the NCFast Case Management System. CONTACT PERSON(S) RESPONSIBLE FOR CORRECTIVE ACTION: Wanda Coles, IMC Supervisor; Kathy Hopkins, IMC Lead Worker; Cindi Everett, IMC Supervisor; Susan Horton, IMC Lead Worker; Mandy Edwards, IMC Supervisor; Brooke Doolin, IMC Lead Worker; Lisa Chaney, IMC OSS ANTICIPATED COMPLETION DATE: 1/31/2020 and Ongoing
Four individuals received benefits when their countable income exceeded the MAGI Medicaid income limits. Questioned cost: The known questioned cost was $138. Context: We sampled 93 participants of 23,461 participants. We noted the conditions above were contained in 4 of the 94 case files inspected. Effect: Individuals with countable income over the MAGI Medicaid income limit were incorrectly deemed eligible to receive Medicaid. The known questioned cost was $138. Cause: Incorrect countable income was entered into NCFAST. Recommendation: We recommend that the County train and monitor employees on the eligibility determination process. We also recommend the County review and amend current policy and procedures to ensure countable income is verified and accurately recorded in NC FAST during the eligibility determination process.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Criteria or specific requirement: Per the North Carolina Medicaid Assistance Program (Medicaid; Title XIX) Compliance Supplement and the DSS manuals (Aged, Blind and Disabled manual, Family and Children Medicaid manual and the Integrated Policy manual), to be eligible to receive benefits under this program the individual must have countable resources below the MAGI Medicaid income limits associated with the individual?s household composition. Condition: Four individuals received benefits when their countable income exceeded the MAGI Medicaid income limits. Questioned cost: The known questioned cost was $138. Context: We sampled 93 participants of 23,461 participants. We noted the conditions above were contained in 4 of the 94 case files inspected. Effect: Individuals with countable income over the MAGI Medicaid income limit were incorrectly deemed eligible to receive Medicaid. The known questioned cost was $138. Cause: Incorrect countable income was entered into NCFAST. Recommendation: We recommend that the County train and monitor employees on the eligibility determination process. We also recommend the County review and amend current policy and procedures to ensure countable income is verified and accurately recorded in NC FAST during the eligibility determination process.
2019-005 ? (Medicaid) Failure to accurately calculate and retain documentation to evidence appropriate eligibility determination with regards to countable resources and countable income. Rockingham County management concurs with the finding and recommendation. CORRECTIVE ACTION PLANNED: Management will train and monitor employees on the eligibility determination process. Management will review and revise current procedures in place to ensure that all eligibility determination documentation for countable income and countable resources are completed and retained in the case file or in the NCFast Case Management System. CONTACT PERSON(S) RESPONSIBLE FOR CORRECTIVE ACTION: Wanda Coles, IMC Supervisor; Kathy Hopkins, IMC Lead Worker; Cindi Everett, IMC Supervisor; Susan Horton, IMC Lead Worker; Mandy Edwards, IMC Supervisor; Brooke Doolin, IMC Lead Worker; Lisa Chaney, IMC OSS ANTICIPATED COMPLETION DATE: 1/31/2020 and Ongoing
Information on the federal program: Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF), CFDA 93.558, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, passed through the N.C Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Social Services. Criteria or specific requirement: Per the North Carolina TANF Program (Work First Program) Compliance Supplement and the DSS manuals, the family?s net earned and unearned income are deducted from the Need Standard for the number of assistance unit members. The payment is one-half the difference. Conditions: We noted that in one instance a families monthly benefit check was larger than the calculated standard payment amount they should have been received. Questioned cost: The known questioned cost was $1,204. Context: We sampled 93 payments from a total population of 5,355 payments made to the participants during the fiscal year. We noted the above condition in 1 of the 93 case files inspected for applicable payments. Effect: Individuals received larger monthly benefit payments than allowed. The known questioned cost was $1,204. Cause: Countable income was incorrectly recorded in NCFAST resulting in an inaccurate needs calculation. Recommendation: We recommend that the County train and monitor employees on the eligibility determination process to understand how the benefits are calculated and determined and that the appropriate amounts are used to pay benefits.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Information on the federal program: Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF), CFDA 93.558, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, passed through the N.C Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Social Services. Criteria or specific requirement: Per the North Carolina TANF Program (Work First Program) Compliance Supplement and the DSS manuals, the family?s net earned and unearned income are deducted from the Need Standard for the number of assistance unit members. The payment is one-half the difference. Conditions: We noted that in one instance a families monthly benefit check was larger than the calculated standard payment amount they should have been received. Questioned cost: The known questioned cost was $1,204. Context: We sampled 93 payments from a total population of 5,355 payments made to the participants during the fiscal year. We noted the above condition in 1 of the 93 case files inspected for applicable payments. Effect: Individuals received larger monthly benefit payments than allowed. The known questioned cost was $1,204. Cause: Countable income was incorrectly recorded in NCFAST resulting in an inaccurate needs calculation. Recommendation: We recommend that the County train and monitor employees on the eligibility determination process to understand how the benefits are calculated and determined and that the appropriate amounts are used to pay benefits.
2019-006 ? (TANF) Failure to correctly record countable income in NCFast resulting in an inaccurate needs calculation. Rockingham County management concurs with the finding and recommendation. CORRECTIVE ACTION PLANNED: Management will train and monitor employees on the eligibility determination process. Management will review and revise current procedures in place to ensure that all eligibility determination documentation for countable income is completed and retained in the case file or in the NCFast Case Management System. Case workers will receive additional training to ensure they understand how the benefits are calculated and determined and that the appropriate amounts are used to pay benefits. CONTACT PERSON(S) RESPONSIBLE FOR CORRECTIVE ACTION: Junita Davis, Supervisor; Kathy Gentle, Lead Worker ANTICIPATED COMPLETION DATE: 1/31/2020 and Ongoing
Information on the federal program: Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF), CFDA 93.558, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, passed through the N.C Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Social Services. Criteria or specific requirement: Per the North Carolina TANF Program (Work First Program) Compliance Supplement and the DSS manuals, to be eligible a family cap is applied when a child is born 10 months after a month in which a parent received cash assistance which does not allow the family?s TANF Family Assistance payment to increase. Conditions: We noted that in one instance a families monthly benefit check increased. Questioned cost: The known questioned cost was $660. Context: We sampled 93 payments from a total population of 5,355 payments made to the participants during the fiscal year. We noted the above condition in 1 of the 93 case files inspected for applicable payments. Effect: Individuals received larger monthly benefit payments than allowed. The known questioned cost was $660. Cause: Proper internal controls are not in place to ensure a DSS caseworker assess the family cap conditions. Recommendation: We recommend that the County train and monitor employees on the eligibility determination process. We also recommend the County review and amend current policy and procedures in place to ensure that the family cap is assessed when determining TANF eligibility.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Information on the federal program: Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF), CFDA 93.558, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, passed through the N.C Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Social Services. Criteria or specific requirement: Per the North Carolina TANF Program (Work First Program) Compliance Supplement and the DSS manuals, to be eligible a family cap is applied when a child is born 10 months after a month in which a parent received cash assistance which does not allow the family?s TANF Family Assistance payment to increase. Conditions: We noted that in one instance a families monthly benefit check increased. Questioned cost: The known questioned cost was $660. Context: We sampled 93 payments from a total population of 5,355 payments made to the participants during the fiscal year. We noted the above condition in 1 of the 93 case files inspected for applicable payments. Effect: Individuals received larger monthly benefit payments than allowed. The known questioned cost was $660. Cause: Proper internal controls are not in place to ensure a DSS caseworker assess the family cap conditions. Recommendation: We recommend that the County train and monitor employees on the eligibility determination process. We also recommend the County review and amend current policy and procedures in place to ensure that the family cap is assessed when determining TANF eligibility.
2019-007 ? (TANF) Failure to demonstrate proper internal controls to ensure that a DSS caseworker accurately assesses and takes appropriate action on family cap conditions. Rockingham County management concurs with the finding and recommendation. CORRECTIVE ACTION PLANNED: Management will train and monitor employees on the eligibility determination process. Management will review and revise current procedures in place to ensure that the family cap is assessed when determining TANF eligibility and that documentation for family cap assessment is completed and retained in the case file or in the NCFast Case Management System. CONTACT PERSON(S) RESPONSIBLE FOR CORRECTIVE ACTION: Junita Davis, Supervisor; Kathy Gentle, Lead Worker ANTICIPATED COMPLETION DATE: 1/31/2020 and Ongoing
Information on the federal program: Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF), CFDA 93.558, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, passed through the N.C Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Social Services. Criteria or specific requirement: Per the North Carolina TANF Program (Work First Program) Compliance Supplement and the DSS manuals, the County must implement the required Income Eligibility and Verification System through the Online Verification System (OVS). Conditions: We noted that in one instance the casefile did not contain a completed OVS. Context: We sampled 93 payments from a total population of 5,355 payments made to the participants during the fiscal year. We noted the above condition in 1 of the 93 case files inspected for applicable payments. Effect: Case files not containing all required documentation result in a risk that the County could provide services to individuals not eligible to receive such services or that such services could be denied to eligible individuals. Subsequent to being notified that required documentation had not been retained in case files, the County was able obtain documentation to substantiate that the applicants tested were eligible to receive benefits. Cause: The County did not retain required documentation in case files at the time eligibility was determined. Recommendation: We recommend that the County train and monitor employees on the eligibility determination process. We also recommend the County review and amend current policy and procedures in place to ensure that all eligibility determination documentation is completed and retained by the County.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Information on the federal program: Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF), CFDA 93.558, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, passed through the N.C Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Social Services. Criteria or specific requirement: Per the North Carolina TANF Program (Work First Program) Compliance Supplement and the DSS manuals, the County must implement the required Income Eligibility and Verification System through the Online Verification System (OVS). Conditions: We noted that in one instance the casefile did not contain a completed OVS. Context: We sampled 93 payments from a total population of 5,355 payments made to the participants during the fiscal year. We noted the above condition in 1 of the 93 case files inspected for applicable payments. Effect: Case files not containing all required documentation result in a risk that the County could provide services to individuals not eligible to receive such services or that such services could be denied to eligible individuals. Subsequent to being notified that required documentation had not been retained in case files, the County was able obtain documentation to substantiate that the applicants tested were eligible to receive benefits. Cause: The County did not retain required documentation in case files at the time eligibility was determined. Recommendation: We recommend that the County train and monitor employees on the eligibility determination process. We also recommend the County review and amend current policy and procedures in place to ensure that all eligibility determination documentation is completed and retained by the County.
2019-008 ? (TANF) Failure to retain required documentation in case files that OVS was completed at the time eligibility was determined. Rockingham County management concurs with the finding and recommendation. CORRECTIVE ACTION PLANNED: Management will train and monitor employees on the eligibility determination process. Management will review and amend current procedures in place to ensure that all eligibility determination documentation is completed and retained in the case file or in the NCFast Case Management System. CONTACT PERSON(S) RESPONSIBLE FOR CORRECTIVE ACTION: Junita Davis, Supervisor; Kathy Gentle, Lead Worker ANTICIPATED COMPLETION DATE: 1/31/2020 and Ongoing
We noted that in one instance the Approval/ Denial Notice form DSS-8107 was not marked sent in NC Fast resulting in the client not having an opportunity for a hearing. Context: We sampled 25 of 137 total denied applications. We noted the above condition in one of the 25 inspected files. Effect: Case files containing an Approval/ Denial Notice form 8107 that is not sent to applicants results in a risk that the denied or approved applicants are not receiving timely communication or an opportunity for a hearing. Cause: Internal controls were not in place to ensure the Approval/ Denial Notice for DSS 8107 is sent in NC FAST. Recommendation: We recommend that the County continue to train and monitor employees on the eligibility/denial application process to ensure eligibility worksheets are completed appropriately, reviewed by the DSS caseworker and retained by the County.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Information on the federal program: Low Income Home Energy Assistance, CFDA 93.568, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, passed through the N.C Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Social Services. Criteria or specific requirement: Per the North Carolina Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Compliance Supplement and Energy Programs Manual published by the Division of Social Services, households denied assistance or not receiving reasonably prompt assistance must have an opportunity for a hearing. Condition: We noted that in one instance the Approval/ Denial Notice form DSS-8107 was not marked sent in NC Fast resulting in the client not having an opportunity for a hearing. Context: We sampled 25 of 137 total denied applications. We noted the above condition in one of the 25 inspected files. Effect: Case files containing an Approval/ Denial Notice form 8107 that is not sent to applicants results in a risk that the denied or approved applicants are not receiving timely communication or an opportunity for a hearing. Cause: Internal controls were not in place to ensure the Approval/ Denial Notice for DSS 8107 is sent in NC FAST. Recommendation: We recommend that the County continue to train and monitor employees on the eligibility/denial application process to ensure eligibility worksheets are completed appropriately, reviewed by the DSS caseworker and retained by the County.
2019-009 ? (LIEAP) Failure to retain required documentation in case files that households who are denied assistance or who do not receive reasonably prompt assistance receive notice of their opportunity for a hearing.. Rockingham County management concurs with the finding and recommendation. CORRECTIVE ACTION PLANNED: Management will train and monitor employees on the eligibility determination/denial process. Management will review and amend current procedures in place to ensure that eligibility worksheets are completed appropriately, that all eligibility determination documentation is completed and retained in the case file or in the NCFast Case Management System and that all Approval/Denial Notices for DSS 8107 are generated, given to the client and marked sent in the NCFast Case Management Systen. CONTACT PERSON(S) RESPONSIBLE FOR CORRECTIVE ACTION: Cindi Everett, IMC Supervisor; Susan Horton, IMC Lead Worker; Lisa Chaney, IMC OSS ANTICIPATED COMPLETION DATE: 1/31/2020 and Ongoing
FAC accepted this audit on January 15, 2019 — management decision was due July 15, 2019.
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
FAC accepted this audit on January 15, 2018 — management decision was due July 15, 2018.
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴FAC accepted this audit on January 11, 2017 — management decision was due July 11, 2017.
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Monitor subrecipient audit findings and compliance status.
Start monitoring →© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.