EIN: 566000315
UEI: UGGQGSSKBGJ5
Audited by: Martin Starnes & Associates, CPAs, P.A.
Oversight agency: 93 [Department of Health and Human Services]
Data as of August 28, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on December 15, 2023. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by June 15, 2024 (804 days ago).
What is a management decision? →We noted one instance of a Food and Nutrition services claim entered in EPI where adequate case documentation was not maintained. The case file did not include a signed form 1682. Context: We sampled 40 claims that were current in the EPI system and noted the above condition in 1 (2.5%) of the claims tested. Effect: The County may not have required supporting documentation for claims entered into the EPI system. There is a risk that claims may not be valid as a result. Cause: Turnover in supervisor position left duties unfulfilled and an unsigned Form 1682 in the case file. Questioned Costs: The finding represents an internal control weakness; therefore, no questioned costs are applicable. Upon further review, the case was still eligible to report a claim entry into EPI. Recommendation: The County should implement controls to ensure that all required documentation is adequate and maintained within the case file. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: See Corrective Action Plan submitted with this report.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Special Tests and Provisions (Enterprise Program Integrity) Criteria: Per the North Carolina DSS Crosscutting Requirements compliance supplement, counties must acquire adequate case documentation to substantiate the claim entry into the Enterprise Program Integrity (EPI). This information includes but is not limited to the dates of the overpayment period, documentary evidence to substantiate that an overpayment occurred, such as wage stubs or verification from an employer, other income verification and household composition verification, and the budgets used to compute the amount of the overpayment. This also includes proper use of standardized form 1682. Condition: We noted one instance of a Food and Nutrition services claim entered in EPI where adequate case documentation was not maintained. The case file did not include a signed form 1682. Context: We sampled 40 claims that were current in the EPI system and noted the above condition in 1 (2.5%) of the claims tested. Effect: The County may not have required supporting documentation for claims entered into the EPI system. There is a risk that claims may not be valid as a result. Cause: Turnover in supervisor position left duties unfulfilled and an unsigned Form 1682 in the case file. Questioned Costs: The finding represents an internal control weakness; therefore, no questioned costs are applicable. Upon further review, the case was still eligible to report a claim entry into EPI. Recommendation: The County should implement controls to ensure that all required documentation is adequate and maintained within the case file. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: See Corrective Action Plan submitted with this report.
Corrective Action/Management’s Response: The Program Integrity Supervisor will pull three random cases each month to ensure adequate case documentation to substantiate the claim entry into the Enterprise Program Integrity (EPI). 1. Dates of the overpayment period. 2. Documentary evidence to substantiate that an overpayment occurred, such as wage stubs or verification from an employer, other income verification and household composition verification, and the budgets used to compute the amount of the overpayment. 3. Ensure there is a completed 1682 Proposed Completion Date: Immediate and ongoing
FAC accepted this audit on January 15, 2019 — management decision was due July 15, 2019.
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴FAC accepted this audit on January 15, 2018 — management decision was due July 15, 2018.
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴FAC accepted this audit on February 26, 2017 — management decision was due August 26, 2017.
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.
Start monitoring →© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.
