EIN: 566000296
UEI: KZN4GK5262K3
Data as of August 21, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on December 10, 2024. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by June 10, 2025 (438 days ago).
What is a management decision? →There was one (1) technical error discovered during our procedures that verifications in the County documentation and the representative data contained in NC FAST were not the same amounts or files containing policy requirements were not properly documented to be considered in compliance with program control requirements. The error was as follows: One (1) recertification procedure was started; however, the case was rolled forward by the system before the recertification was completed. No QCs noted per review of admin letters. Questioned Costs (QC): There was no affect to eligibility and there were no questioned costs.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Criteria: Medicaid for Aged, Blind and Disabled case records should contain documentation that verifications were done in preparation of the application/recertification and these items will agree to reports in the NC FAST system. In this process, documentation should be present and agree back to the records in the NC FAST system. Any items discovered in the process should be considered in regards to a specific eligibility requirement and explained within the documentation. Condition: There was one (1) technical error discovered during our procedures that verifications in the County documentation and the representative data contained in NC FAST were not the same amounts or files containing policy requirements were not properly documented to be considered in compliance with program control requirements. The error was as follows: One (1) recertification procedure was started; however, the case was rolled forward by the system before the recertification was completed. No QCs noted per review of admin letters. Questioned Costs (QC): There was no affect to eligibility and there were no questioned costs.
FORCED ELIGIBILITY Supervisors/Lead Workers and staff will pull case management reports weekly to ensure all recertifications are actively being completed. Supervisors will disburse vacant caseload timely after employee leaves to ensure all recertifications are accounted for, distributed and worked. Supervisors for will ensure that staff run eligibility checks even if the recertification is rolled over by the system/state. In an effort to prevent the system from automatically rolling the case over, staff will process (recertify and terminate) all cases by the 8110 cutoff date and document on the case. Staff will implement these changes for January 2025 recertification period. Staff will be informed on changes and changes will be implemented on December 2, 2024.
2023-001
FAC accepted this audit on December 29, 2023 — management decision was due June 29, 2024.
There were five (5) technical errors discovered during our procedures that verifications in the County documentation and the representative data contained in NC FAST were not the same amounts or files containing policy requirements were not properly documented to be considered in compliance with program control requirements. The errors were as follows: One (1) did not have a completed recertification and the case was rolled forward by the system, however no QC noted per review of admin letters. Four (4) recertification procedures were started; however, the case was rolled forward by the system before the recertification was completed. No QCs noted per review of admin letters. Questioned Costs (QC): There was no affect to eligibility and there were no questioned costs.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Criteria: Medicaid for Aged, Blind and Disabled case records should contain documentation that verifications were done in preparation of the application/recertification and these items will agree to reports in the NC FAST system. In this process, documentation should be present and agree back to the records in the NC FAST system. Any items discovered in the process should be considered in regards to a specific eligibility requirement and explained within the documentation. Condition: There were five (5) technical errors discovered during our procedures that verifications in the County documentation and the representative data contained in NC FAST were not the same amounts or files containing policy requirements were not properly documented to be considered in compliance with program control requirements. The errors were as follows: One (1) did not have a completed recertification and the case was rolled forward by the system, however no QC noted per review of admin letters. Four (4) recertification procedures were started; however, the case was rolled forward by the system before the recertification was completed. No QCs noted per review of admin letters. Questioned Costs (QC): There was no affect to eligibility and there were no questioned costs.
FORCED ELIGIBILITY Supervisors/Lead Workers and staff will pull case management reports weekly to ensure all recertifications are actively being completed. Staff will proactively use desk or Microsoft calendar to keep up with all recertifications. Staff will complete refresher courses for timely notices. Supervisors will disburse vacant caseload timely after employee leaves to ensure all recertifications are accounted for, distributed and worked. Supervisors will ensure that staff run eligibility checks even if the recertification is rolled over by the system/state. In an effort to prevent the system from automatically rolling the case over, staff will process (recertify and terminate) all cases by the 8110 cutoff date. Staff will implement these changes for the January 2024 recertification period. Staff will be informed on changes and changes will be implemented on December 4, 2023.
2022-001
FAC accepted this audit on October 27, 2023 — management decision was due April 27, 2024.
There were seven (7) technical errors discovered during our procedures that verifications in the County documentation and the representative data contained in NC FAST were not the same amounts or files containing policy requirements were not properly documented to be considered in compliance with program control requirements. The errors were as follows: Three (3) did not have a completed recertification and the case was rolled forward by the system, however no QC noted per review of admin letters. One (1) did not have completed recertification for case that was transferred from another county, however no QC noted per review of admin letters. One (1) contained an untimely recertification and was forced eligibility due to Hawkins v. Choen extension, however no QC noted per review of admin letters. One (1) contained an error where the system automatically updated unearned income after the recertification was completed resulting in the budget not agreeing to the amounts in NCFAST. Recertification appeared to be completed properly and we considered this to be an NCFAST error and not a County error. One (1) recertification was originally completed properly, however budget calculations were erroneously updated after the recertification was completed by a caseworker resulting in NCFAST numbers disagreeing to the budget. There was no QC as the participant was properly noted as eligible. Questioned Costs (QC): There was no affect to eligibility and there were no questioned costs. Context: We examined 120 Medicaid applicants to re-determine eligibility. These findings were disclosed in a separately issued spreadsheet to the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services and are being reported with the financial statement audit as it relates to Medicaid administrative cost compliance audit. Effect: For those certifications/re-certifications there was a chance that information was not properly documented and reconciled to NC FAST which affect countable resource or program specific requirements and a participant could have been approved for benefits that they were not eligible. Identification of repeat finding: This is a repeat finding from the immediate previous audit, 2021-002. Cause: Ineffective record keeping and ineffective case review process. Recommendation: Files should be reviewed internally to ensure proper documentation is in place for eligibility. Workers should be retrained on what files should contain and the importance of complete and accurate record keeping. We recommend that all files include online verifications, documented resources of income and those amounts agree to information in NC FAST.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Significant Deficiency US Department of Health and Human Services Passed through the NC Dept. of Health and Human Services Program Name: Medical Assistance Program (Medicaid; Title XIX) CFDA #: 93.778 Finding: 2022-01 Eligibility For the Year Ended June 30, 2022 Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs (Continued) DUPLIN COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA Criteria: Medicaid for Aged, Blind and Disabled case records should contain documentation that verifications were done in preparation of the application/recertification and these items will agree to reports in the NC FAST system. In this process, documentation should be present and agree back to the records in the NC FAST system. Any items discovered in the process should be considered in regards to a specific eligibility requirement and explained within the documentation. Condition: There were seven (7) technical errors discovered during our procedures that verifications in the County documentation and the representative data contained in NC FAST were not the same amounts or files containing policy requirements were not properly documented to be considered in compliance with program control requirements. The errors were as follows: Three (3) did not have a completed recertification and the case was rolled forward by the system, however no QC noted per review of admin letters. One (1) did not have completed recertification for case that was transferred from another county, however no QC noted per review of admin letters. One (1) contained an untimely recertification and was forced eligibility due to Hawkins v. Choen extension, however no QC noted per review of admin letters. One (1) contained an error where the system automatically updated unearned income after the recertification was completed resulting in the budget not agreeing to the amounts in NCFAST. Recertification appeared to be completed properly and we considered this to be an NCFAST error and not a County error. One (1) recertification was originally completed properly, however budget calculations were erroneously updated after the recertification was completed by a caseworker resulting in NCFAST numbers disagreeing to the budget. There was no QC as the participant was properly noted as eligible. Questioned Costs (QC): There was no affect to eligibility and there were no questioned costs. Context: We examined 120 Medicaid applicants to re-determine eligibility. These findings were disclosed in a separately issued spreadsheet to the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services and are being reported with the financial statement audit as it relates to Medicaid administrative cost compliance audit. Effect: For those certifications/re-certifications there was a chance that information was not properly documented and reconciled to NC FAST which affect countable resource or program specific requirements and a participant could have been approved for benefits that they were not eligible. Identification of repeat finding: This is a repeat finding from the immediate previous audit, 2021-002. Cause: Ineffective record keeping and ineffective case review process. Recommendation: Files should be reviewed internally to ensure proper documentation is in place for eligibility. Workers should be retrained on what files should contain and the importance of complete and accurate record keeping. We recommend that all files include online verifications, documented resources of income and those amounts agree to information in NC FAST.
2022-01 Technical Name of contact person: Annie Murrell, Director of Social Services Corrective Action: Forced Eligibility Supervisors will ensure that staff are utilizing dictation templates that was implemented in January 2022. This template addresses Admin letters when needed and training was completed with staff. Supervisors have implemented reviewing the task that caseworkers are receiving. Completing these reviews will allow supervisors to monitor timeliness regarding medical forced/recertifications. Supervisors for all Medicaid programs will complete a review of all transfer cases prior to accepting the transfer to identify possible errors in the case. If needed supervisors will reach out to the transferring county. This change will be effective October 2023. Income - Total Countable Income CMA implemented recertification checklist in September 2022 that will assist workers in completing steps during the recertification process and second partying their work as well. Proposed Completion Date: October 31, 2023
2021-002
FAC accepted this audit on March 14, 2022 — management decision was due September 14, 2022.
There were six errors discovered during our procedures that inaccurate information was entered when determining eligibility. Six applicant/beneficiaries that received assistance for which the recipient was not eligible Questioned Costs: The amount of claims paid on behalf of the above ineligible participants for fiscal year ending 6/30/2021 resulted in a questioned costs of $1,192. Context: We examined 120 Medicaid applicants to re-determine eligibility. These findings were disclosed in a separately issued spreadsheet to the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services and are being reported with the financial statement audit as it relates to Medicaid administrative cost compliance audit. Effect: For those certifications/re-certifications there was a chance that information was not properly documented and reconciled to NC FAST which affect countable resource or program specific requirements and a participant could have been approved for benefits that they were not eligible. Identification of a repeat finding: This is a repeat finding from the immediate previous audit, 2020-001. Cause: Ineffective record keeping and ineffective case review process, incomplete documentation, and incorrect application of rules for purposes of determining eligibility. Recommendation: Files should be reviewed internally to ensure proper documentation is in place for eligibility. Workers should be retrained on what files should contain and the importance of complete and accurate record keeping. We recommend that all files include online verifications, documented resources of income and those amounts agree to information in NC FAST. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: The County agrees with the finding. Supervisors will perform second party reviews to ensure proper documentation is contained in files to support eligibility determinations. Workers will be retrained on what information should be maintained in case files, the importance of complete and accurate record keeping, and reserve calculations. The County finance office will also participate in the review process.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Significant Deficiency/Noncompliance US Department of Health and Human Services Passed through the NC Dept. of Health and Human Services Program Name: Medical Assistance Program (Medicaid; Title XIX) CFDA # 93.778 Finding: 2021 ? 001 Eligibility Criteria: In accordance with 42 CFR 435, documentation must be obtained as needed to determine if a recipient meets specific standards, and documentation must be maintained to support eligibility determinations. In accordance with 2 CFR 200, management should have an adequate system of internal controls procedures in place to ensure an applicant is properly determined or redetermined for benefits. Condition: There were six errors discovered during our procedures that inaccurate information was entered when determining eligibility. Six applicant/beneficiaries that received assistance for which the recipient was not eligible Questioned Costs: The amount of claims paid on behalf of the above ineligible participants for fiscal year ending 6/30/2021 resulted in a questioned costs of $1,192. Context: We examined 120 Medicaid applicants to re-determine eligibility. These findings were disclosed in a separately issued spreadsheet to the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services and are being reported with the financial statement audit as it relates to Medicaid administrative cost compliance audit. Effect: For those certifications/re-certifications there was a chance that information was not properly documented and reconciled to NC FAST which affect countable resource or program specific requirements and a participant could have been approved for benefits that they were not eligible. Identification of a repeat finding: This is a repeat finding from the immediate previous audit, 2020-001. Cause: Ineffective record keeping and ineffective case review process, incomplete documentation, and incorrect application of rules for purposes of determining eligibility. Recommendation: Files should be reviewed internally to ensure proper documentation is in place for eligibility. Workers should be retrained on what files should contain and the importance of complete and accurate record keeping. We recommend that all files include online verifications, documented resources of income and those amounts agree to information in NC FAST. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: The County agrees with the finding. Supervisors will perform second party reviews to ensure proper documentation is contained in files to support eligibility determinations. Workers will be retrained on what information should be maintained in case files, the importance of complete and accurate record keeping, and reserve calculations. The County finance office will also participate in the review process.
Name of contact Person: Marva G. Scott, Interim Director of Social Services Corrective Action: Procedures and controls already developed will be reviewed with caseworkers. Medicaid caseworkers will receive additional training on verifying income in order to determine eligibility. Supervisors will review action reports regularly to determine if the correct action was taken and cases were closed out timely. Caseworkers will be retrained on what information should be entered into NC Fast, and the importance of calculating reserves when determining eligibility. Proposed Completion Date: March 30, 2022.
2020-001
There were forty nine (49) technical errors discovered during our procedures that verifications in the county documentation and the representative data contained in NC FAST were not the same amounts or files containing policy requirements were not properly documented to be considered in compliance with program control requirements. The errors were as follows: Two (2) did not have child support referrals completed, Twenty five (25) contained incomplete or untimely verification of facts, Thirteen (13) did not have accurate budget calculations in NC FAST, Two (2) failed to correctly force eligibility per policy requirements, Four (4) did not have accurate resource calculations, Three (3) contained inaccurate family size calculations. Questioned Costs: There was no affect to eligibility and there were no questioned costs. Context: We examined 120 Medicaid applicants to re-determine eligibility. These findings were disclosed in a separately issued spreadsheet to the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services and are being reported with the financial statement audit as it relates to Medicaid administrative cost compliance audit. Effect: For those certifications/re-certifications there was a chance that information was not properly documented and reconciled to NC FAST which affect countable resource or program specific requirements and a participant could have been approved for benefits that they were not eligible. Identification of a repeat finding: This is a repeat finding from the immediate previous audit, 2020-002. Cause: Ineffective record keeping and ineffective case review process, incomplete documentation, and incorrect application of rules for purposes of determining eligibility. Recommendation: Files should be reviewed internally to ensure proper documentation is in place for eligibility. Workers should be retrained on what files should contain and the importance of complete and accurate record keeping. We recommend that all files include online verifications, documented resources of income and those amounts agree to information in NC FAST. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: The County agrees with the finding. Supervisors will perform second party reviews to ensure proper documentation is contained in files to support eligibility determinations. Workers will be retrained on what information should be maintained in case files, the importance of complete and accurate record keeping, and reserve calculations. The County finance office will also participating in the review process.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Significant Deficiency US Department of Health and Human Services Passed through the NC Dept. of Health and Human Services Program Name: Medical Assistance Program (Medicaid; Title XIX) CFDA # 93.778 Finding: 2021 ? 002 Eligibility Criteria: Medicaid for Aged, Blind and Disabled case records should contain documentation that verifications were done in preparation of the application/recertification and these items will agree to reports in the NC FAST system. In this process, documentation should be present and agree back to the records in the NC FAST system. Any items discovered in the process should be considered in regards to a specific eligibility requirement and explained within the documentation. Condition: There were forty nine (49) technical errors discovered during our procedures that verifications in the county documentation and the representative data contained in NC FAST were not the same amounts or files containing policy requirements were not properly documented to be considered in compliance with program control requirements. The errors were as follows: Two (2) did not have child support referrals completed, Twenty five (25) contained incomplete or untimely verification of facts, Thirteen (13) did not have accurate budget calculations in NC FAST, Two (2) failed to correctly force eligibility per policy requirements, Four (4) did not have accurate resource calculations, Three (3) contained inaccurate family size calculations. Questioned Costs: There was no affect to eligibility and there were no questioned costs. Context: We examined 120 Medicaid applicants to re-determine eligibility. These findings were disclosed in a separately issued spreadsheet to the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services and are being reported with the financial statement audit as it relates to Medicaid administrative cost compliance audit. Effect: For those certifications/re-certifications there was a chance that information was not properly documented and reconciled to NC FAST which affect countable resource or program specific requirements and a participant could have been approved for benefits that they were not eligible. Identification of a repeat finding: This is a repeat finding from the immediate previous audit, 2020-002. Cause: Ineffective record keeping and ineffective case review process, incomplete documentation, and incorrect application of rules for purposes of determining eligibility. Recommendation: Files should be reviewed internally to ensure proper documentation is in place for eligibility. Workers should be retrained on what files should contain and the importance of complete and accurate record keeping. We recommend that all files include online verifications, documented resources of income and those amounts agree to information in NC FAST. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: The County agrees with the finding. Supervisors will perform second party reviews to ensure proper documentation is contained in files to support eligibility determinations. Workers will be retrained on what information should be maintained in case files, the importance of complete and accurate record keeping, and reserve calculations. The County finance office will also participating in the review process.
Name of contact Person: Marva G. Scott, Interim Director of Social Services Corrective Action: : Supervisors will ensure that workers know how to run the work number for individuals fourteen years and older with potential income in order to determine eligibility. Supervisors will provide training to caseworkers on how go into NC Fast to run the work number verification. Proposed Completion Date: March 30, 2022.
2020-002
FAC accepted this audit on June 2, 2021 — management decision was due December 2, 2021.
There were five errors discovered during our procedures that inaccurate information was entered when determining eligibility. Five applicant/beneficiaries that received assistance for which the recipient was not eligible Questioned Costs: The amount of claims paid on behalf of the above ineligible participants for fiscal year ending 6/30/2020 did not exceed the threshold for a questioned cost determination. Context: We examined 91 Medicaid applicants to re-determine eligibility. These findings were disclosed in a separately issued spreadsheet to the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services and are being reported with the financial statement audit as it relates to Medicaid administrative cost compliance audit. Effect: For those certifications/re-certifications there was a chance that information was not properly documented and reconciled to NC FAST which affect countable resource or program specific requirements and a participant could have been approved for benefits that they were not eligible. Cause: Ineffective record keeping and ineffective case review process, incomplete documentation, and incorrect application of rules for purposes of determining eligibility. Recommendation: Files should be reviewed internally to ensure proper documentation is in place for eligibility. Workers should be retrained on what files should contain and the importance of complete and accurate record keeping. We recommend that all files include online verifications, documented resources of income and those amounts agree to information in NC FAST. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: The County agrees with the finding. Supervisors will perform second party reviews to ensure proper documentation is contained in files to support eligibility determinations. Workers will be retrained on what information should be maintained in case files, the importance of complete and accurate record keeping, and reserve calculations. The County finance office will also participate in the review process.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Criteria: In accordance with 42 CFR 435, documentation must be obtained as needed to determine if a recipient meets specific standards, and documentation must be maintained to support eligibility determinations. In accordance with 2 CFR 200, management should have an adequate system of internal controls procedures in place to ensure an applicant is properly determined or redetermined for benefits. Condition: There were five errors discovered during our procedures that inaccurate information was entered when determining eligibility. Five applicant/beneficiaries that received assistance for which the recipient was not eligible Questioned Costs: The amount of claims paid on behalf of the above ineligible participants for fiscal year ending 6/30/2020 did not exceed the threshold for a questioned cost determination. Context: We examined 91 Medicaid applicants to re-determine eligibility. These findings were disclosed in a separately issued spreadsheet to the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services and are being reported with the financial statement audit as it relates to Medicaid administrative cost compliance audit. Effect: For those certifications/re-certifications there was a chance that information was not properly documented and reconciled to NC FAST which affect countable resource or program specific requirements and a participant could have been approved for benefits that they were not eligible. Cause: Ineffective record keeping and ineffective case review process, incomplete documentation, and incorrect application of rules for purposes of determining eligibility. Recommendation: Files should be reviewed internally to ensure proper documentation is in place for eligibility. Workers should be retrained on what files should contain and the importance of complete and accurate record keeping. We recommend that all files include online verifications, documented resources of income and those amounts agree to information in NC FAST. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: The County agrees with the finding. Supervisors will perform second party reviews to ensure proper documentation is contained in files to support eligibility determinations. Workers will be retrained on what information should be maintained in case files, the importance of complete and accurate record keeping, and reserve calculations. The County finance office will also participate in the review process.
Name of contact Person: Susan Thigpen, Director of Social Services Corrective Action: Procedures and controls are being developed for caseworkers to follow. Medicaid caseworkers will receive additional training on the newly created ?Documentation Policy? to remind each of the policies and procedures to be followed in the application process. Supervisors will review action reports regularly to determine if correct was taken and that action was correctly closed out. Workers will be retrained on what information should be maintained in case files, the importance of complete and accurate record keeping, and reserve calculations. Proposed Completion Date: Certain controls are currently being created and reviewed. Management will continue to monitor the progress of this issue and modify the controls as needed.
There were twenty seven (27) technical errors discovered during our procedures that verifications in the county documentation and the representative data contained in NC FAST were not the same amounts or files containing policy requirements were not properly documented to be considered in compliance with program control requirements. The errors were as follows: Two (2) did not have child support referrals completed, Five (5) contained incomplete or untimely verification of facts, Six (6) did not have accurate budget calculations in NC FAST, Two (2) lacked sufficient required documentation, Six (6) did not have accurate resource calculations, One (1) contained inaccurate family size calculations, Five (5) contained NC FAST input errors not resulting in a secondary calculation error. Questioned Costs: There was no affect to eligibility and there were no questioned costs. Context: We examined 91 Medicaid applicants to re-determine eligibility. These findings were disclosed in a separately issued spreadsheet to the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services and are being reported with the financial statement audit as it relates to Medicaid administrative cost compliance audit. Effect: For those certifications/re-certifications there was a chance that information was not properly documented and reconciled to NC FAST which affect countable resource or program specific requirements and a participant could have been approved for benefits that they were not eligible. Identification of a repeat finding: This is a repeat finding from the immediate previous audit, 2019-002. Cause: Ineffective record keeping and ineffective case review process, incomplete documentation, and incorrect application of rules for purposes of determining eligibility. Recommendation: Files should be reviewed internally to ensure proper documentation is in place for eligibility. Workers should be retrained on what files should contain and the importance of complete and accurate record keeping. We recommend that all files include online verifications, documented resources of income and those amounts agree to information in NC FAST. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: The County agrees with the finding. Supervisors will perform second party reviews to ensure proper documentation is contained in files to support eligibility determinations. Workers will be retrained on what information should be maintained in case files, the importance of complete and accurate record keeping, and reserve calculations. The County finance office will also participating in the review process.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Criteria: Medicaid for Aged, Blind and Disabled case records should contain documentation that verifications were done in preparation of the application/recertification and these items will agree to reports in the NC FAST system. In this process, documentation should be present and agree back to the records in the NC FAST system. Any items discovered in the process should be considered in regards to a specific eligibility requirement and explained within the documentation. Condition: There were twenty seven (27) technical errors discovered during our procedures that verifications in the county documentation and the representative data contained in NC FAST were not the same amounts or files containing policy requirements were not properly documented to be considered in compliance with program control requirements. The errors were as follows: Two (2) did not have child support referrals completed, Five (5) contained incomplete or untimely verification of facts, Six (6) did not have accurate budget calculations in NC FAST, Two (2) lacked sufficient required documentation, Six (6) did not have accurate resource calculations, One (1) contained inaccurate family size calculations, Five (5) contained NC FAST input errors not resulting in a secondary calculation error. Questioned Costs: There was no affect to eligibility and there were no questioned costs. Context: We examined 91 Medicaid applicants to re-determine eligibility. These findings were disclosed in a separately issued spreadsheet to the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services and are being reported with the financial statement audit as it relates to Medicaid administrative cost compliance audit. Effect: For those certifications/re-certifications there was a chance that information was not properly documented and reconciled to NC FAST which affect countable resource or program specific requirements and a participant could have been approved for benefits that they were not eligible. Identification of a repeat finding: This is a repeat finding from the immediate previous audit, 2019-002. Cause: Ineffective record keeping and ineffective case review process, incomplete documentation, and incorrect application of rules for purposes of determining eligibility. Recommendation: Files should be reviewed internally to ensure proper documentation is in place for eligibility. Workers should be retrained on what files should contain and the importance of complete and accurate record keeping. We recommend that all files include online verifications, documented resources of income and those amounts agree to information in NC FAST. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: The County agrees with the finding. Supervisors will perform second party reviews to ensure proper documentation is contained in files to support eligibility determinations. Workers will be retrained on what information should be maintained in case files, the importance of complete and accurate record keeping, and reserve calculations. The County finance office will also participating in the review process.
Name of contact Person: Susan Thigpen, Director of Social Services Corrective Action: Procedures and controls are being developed for caseworkers to follow. Medicaid anf TANF caseworkers will receive additional training on the newly created ?Documentation Policy? to remind each of the policies and procedures to be followed in the application process. Supervisors will review action reports regularly to determine if correct was taken and that action was correctly closed out. Workers will be retrained on what information should be maintained in case files, the importance of complete and accurate record keeping, and reserve calculations. Proposed Completion Date: Certain controls are currently being created and reviewed. Management will continue to monitor the progress of this issue and modify the controls as needed.
2019-002
There were two (2) technical errors discovered during our procedures that verifications in the county documentation and the representative data contained in NC FAST were not the same amounts or files containing policy requirements were not properly documented to be considered in compliance with program control requirements. The errors were as follows: One (1) did not contain the required DSS-8227 form or it was not prepared in accordance with program requirements, One (1) did not input kinship information correctly in NC FAST. Questioned Costs: There was no affect to eligibility and there were no questioned costs. Context: We examined 25 Work First applicants to re-determine eligibility. These findings are being reported with the financial statement audit as it relates to Temporary Assistance for Needy Families administrative cost compliance audit. Effect: For those certifications/re-certifications there was a chance that information was not properly documented and reconciled to NC FAST which affect calculation of financial need or program specific requirements and a participant could have been approved for benefits that they were not eligible. Cause: Ineffective record keeping and ineffective case review process, incomplete documentation, and incorrect application of rules for purposes of determining eligibility. Recommendation: Files should be reviewed internally to ensure proper documentation is in place for eligibility. Workers should be retrained on what files should contain and the importance of complete and accurate record keeping. We recommend that all files include online verifications, documented resources of income and those amounts agree to information in NC FAST. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: The County agrees with the finding. Supervisors will perform second party reviews to ensure proper documentation is contained in files to support eligibility determinations. Workers will be retrained on what information should be maintained in case files, the importance of complete and accurate record keeping, and reserve calculations. The County finance office will also participating in the review process.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Criteria: Temporary Assistance for Needy Families, program distinction of Work First, case records should contain documentation that verifications were done in preparation of the application/recertification and these items will agree to reports in the NC FAST system. In this process, documentation should be present and agree back to the records in the NC FAST system. Any items discovered in the process should be considered in regards to a specific eligibility requirement and explained within the documentation. Condition: There were two (2) technical errors discovered during our procedures that verifications in the county documentation and the representative data contained in NC FAST were not the same amounts or files containing policy requirements were not properly documented to be considered in compliance with program control requirements. The errors were as follows: One (1) did not contain the required DSS-8227 form or it was not prepared in accordance with program requirements, One (1) did not input kinship information correctly in NC FAST. Questioned Costs: There was no affect to eligibility and there were no questioned costs. Context: We examined 25 Work First applicants to re-determine eligibility. These findings are being reported with the financial statement audit as it relates to Temporary Assistance for Needy Families administrative cost compliance audit. Effect: For those certifications/re-certifications there was a chance that information was not properly documented and reconciled to NC FAST which affect calculation of financial need or program specific requirements and a participant could have been approved for benefits that they were not eligible. Cause: Ineffective record keeping and ineffective case review process, incomplete documentation, and incorrect application of rules for purposes of determining eligibility. Recommendation: Files should be reviewed internally to ensure proper documentation is in place for eligibility. Workers should be retrained on what files should contain and the importance of complete and accurate record keeping. We recommend that all files include online verifications, documented resources of income and those amounts agree to information in NC FAST. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: The County agrees with the finding. Supervisors will perform second party reviews to ensure proper documentation is contained in files to support eligibility determinations. Workers will be retrained on what information should be maintained in case files, the importance of complete and accurate record keeping, and reserve calculations. The County finance office will also participating in the review process.
Name of contact Person: Susan Thigpen, Director of Social Services Corrective Action: Procedures and controls are being developed for caseworkers to follow. Medicaid anf TANF caseworkers will receive additional training on the newly created ?Documentation Policy? to remind each of the policies and procedures to be followed in the application process. Supervisors will review action reports regularly to determine if correct was taken and that action was correctly closed out. Workers will be retrained on what information should be maintained in case files, the importance of complete and accurate record keeping, and reserve calculations. Proposed Completion Date: Certain controls are currently being created and reviewed. Management will continue to monitor the progress of this issue and modify the controls as needed.
FAC accepted this audit on November 30, 2020 — management decision was due May 30, 2021.
US Department of Agriculture Passed through the NC Dept. of Health and Human Services Program Name: Medical Assistance Program (Medicaid; Title XIX) CFDA # 93.778
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴US Department of Agriculture Passed through the NC Dept. of Health and Human Services Program Name: Medical Assistance Program (Medicaid; Title XIX) CFDA # 93.778
Finding 2019 ? 002 Name of contact person: Susan Thigpen, Director Corrective Action: Procedures and controls are being developed for caseworkers to follow. Medicaid caseworkers will receive additional training on the newly created ?Documentation Policy? to remind each of the policies and procedures to be followed in the application process. In addition, second party reviews will be conducted to monitor the actual application of the policy. The finance office will assist with these reviews. Proposed Completion Date: Certain controls are currently being created and reviewed. Management will continue to monitor the progress of this issue and modify the controls as needed.
2018-002
FAC accepted this audit on September 22, 2019 — management decision was due March 22, 2020.
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Monitor subrecipient audit findings and compliance status.
Start monitoring →© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.