Cabarrus County

EIN: 566000281

UEI: PF3KTEELMHV6

Data as of August 23, 2026

Cabarrus County10 audit years18 findings2 repeat
10
Audit Years
18
Total Findings
2
Repeat Findings

FY 2019-06-30

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on November 19, 2019. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by May 19, 2020 (2288 days ago).

What is a management decision? →
2019-002
Eligibility

Information on the federal program: Medicaid Cluster (Medicaid), CFDA 93.778, U.S. Department of Health andHuman Services, passed through the N.C Department of Health and Human Services, Division of MedicalAssistance.Criteria or specific requirement: Per the North Carolina Medicaid Assistance Program (Medicaid; Title XIX)Compliance Supplement and the DSS manuals (Aged, Blind and Disabled manual, Family and ChildrenMedicaid manual and the Integrated Policy manual), case files for individuals or families receivingassistance are required to retain documentation to evidence appropriate eligibility determination,including:? verifications of date of birth? verifications of United States citizenship? accurate record of household members and relationships? verification of social security number? verification of real property ownership? accurate computation of countable income? verification of earned income? verification of unearned income? social security statusConditions: We noted that in two instances the case file did not contain evidence to verify the individual'sdate of birth. In two instances, the casefile did not contain evidence that SOLIQ was completed or manualdocumentation obtained to verify the individuals citizenship/ alien status. In one instance, the case recorddid not contain evidence that the household and relationship information to verify household composition.In two instances, the Employment Security Commission (ESC) OVS was not completed to verify theindividual?s earned income. In two instances, SOLQ OVS/ OLV, Bendex OVS/OLV, SDX OVS, ESC OVS, andACTS OVS were not completed to verify the individual?s unearned income. In two instances, the case recorddid not contain evidence that the State Online Query OVS (SOLQ) was completed to verify the individual?sSocial Security Number (SSN). In one instance, the case record did not contain an appropriate incomeconversion and computation in accordance with policy manuals. In two instances, the total countableincome was not recorded accurately into NC FAST based upon documentation in the case record. In oneinstance, the case record did not contain eligibility reviews for an individual who no longer receives SSI.Context: We sampled 93 payments from a total population of 2,026,496 payments made to the participantsduring the fiscal year. We noted the above condition in 5 of the 93 case files inspected for applicablepayments.Effect: Case files not containing all required documentation results in a risk that the County could provideservices to individuals not eligible to receive such services or that such services could be denied to eligibleindividuals. Subsequent to being notified that required documentation had not been retained in case files,the County was able obtain documentation to substantiate that the applicants tested were eligible toreceive benefits.Cause: The County did not retain required documentation in case files at the time eligibility wasdetermined.Recommendation: We recommend that the County train and monitor employees on the eligibilitydetermination process. We also recommend the County review and amend current policy and proceduresin place to ensure that all eligibility determination documentation is completed and retained by the County.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Information on the federal program: Medicaid Cluster (Medicaid), CFDA 93.778, U.S. Department of Health andHuman Services, passed through the N.C Department of Health and Human Services, Division of MedicalAssistance.Criteria or specific requirement: Per the North Carolina Medicaid Assistance Program (Medicaid; Title XIX)Compliance Supplement and the DSS manuals (Aged, Blind and Disabled manual, Family and ChildrenMedicaid manual and the Integrated Policy manual), case files for individuals or families receivingassistance are required to retain documentation to evidence appropriate eligibility determination,including:? verifications of date of birth? verifications of United States citizenship? accurate record of household members and relationships? verification of social security number? verification of real property ownership? accurate computation of countable income? verification of earned income? verification of unearned income? social security statusConditions: We noted that in two instances the case file did not contain evidence to verify the individual'sdate of birth. In two instances, the casefile did not contain evidence that SOLIQ was completed or manualdocumentation obtained to verify the individuals citizenship/ alien status. In one instance, the case recorddid not contain evidence that the household and relationship information to verify household composition.In two instances, the Employment Security Commission (ESC) OVS was not completed to verify theindividual?s earned income. In two instances, SOLQ OVS/ OLV, Bendex OVS/OLV, SDX OVS, ESC OVS, andACTS OVS were not completed to verify the individual?s unearned income. In two instances, the case recorddid not contain evidence that the State Online Query OVS (SOLQ) was completed to verify the individual?sSocial Security Number (SSN). In one instance, the case record did not contain an appropriate incomeconversion and computation in accordance with policy manuals. In two instances, the total countableincome was not recorded accurately into NC FAST based upon documentation in the case record. In oneinstance, the case record did not contain eligibility reviews for an individual who no longer receives SSI.Context: We sampled 93 payments from a total population of 2,026,496 payments made to the participantsduring the fiscal year. We noted the above condition in 5 of the 93 case files inspected for applicablepayments.Effect: Case files not containing all required documentation results in a risk that the County could provideservices to individuals not eligible to receive such services or that such services could be denied to eligibleindividuals. Subsequent to being notified that required documentation had not been retained in case files,the County was able obtain documentation to substantiate that the applicants tested were eligible toreceive benefits.Cause: The County did not retain required documentation in case files at the time eligibility wasdetermined.Recommendation: We recommend that the County train and monitor employees on the eligibilitydetermination process. We also recommend the County review and amend current policy and proceduresin place to ensure that all eligibility determination documentation is completed and retained by the County.

Corrective Action Plan

Management concurs with the condition, context, and recommendations. Refresher trainings will be conducted to address the deficiencies cited. Updated checklists will be shared with staff and will be recommended for use in completing both applications and reviews of Medicaid eligibility, which will include required documentation and other deficiencies cited. Second party review tools will be updated to ensure internal controls are in place to address the deficiencies cited.

About Eligibility →
2019-003
Eligibility

We noted that in one instance the case file did not contain evidence to verify the individual's lawenforcement search.Context: We sampled 93 payments from a total population of 5,355 payments made to the participantsduring the fiscal year. We noted the above condition in 1 of the 93 case files inspected for applicablepayments.Effect: Case files not containing all required documentation results in a risk that the County could provideservices to individuals not eligible to receive such services or that such services could be denied to eligibleindividuals. Subsequent to being notified that required documentation had not been retained in case files,the County was able obtain documentation to substantiate that the applicants tested were eligible toreceive benefits.Cause: The County did not retain required documentation in case files at the time eligibility wasdetermined.Recommendation: We recommend that the County train and monitor employees on the eligibilitydetermination process. We also recommend the County review and amend current policy and proceduresin place to ensure that all eligibility determination documentation is completed and retained by the County.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Information on the federal program: Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF), CFDA 93.558, U.S.Department of Health and Human Services, passed through the N.C Department of Health and HumanServices, Division of Social Services.Criteria or specific requirement: Per the North Carolina TANF Program (Work First Program) ComplianceSupplement and the DSS manuals, case files for individuals receiving assistance are required to retaindocumentation to evidence appropriate eligibility determination, including:? verification of law enforcement searchCondition: We noted that in one instance the case file did not contain evidence to verify the individual's lawenforcement search.Context: We sampled 93 payments from a total population of 5,355 payments made to the participantsduring the fiscal year. We noted the above condition in 1 of the 93 case files inspected for applicablepayments.Effect: Case files not containing all required documentation results in a risk that the County could provideservices to individuals not eligible to receive such services or that such services could be denied to eligibleindividuals. Subsequent to being notified that required documentation had not been retained in case files,the County was able obtain documentation to substantiate that the applicants tested were eligible toreceive benefits.Cause: The County did not retain required documentation in case files at the time eligibility wasdetermined.Recommendation: We recommend that the County train and monitor employees on the eligibilitydetermination process. We also recommend the County review and amend current policy and proceduresin place to ensure that all eligibility determination documentation is completed and retained by the County.

Corrective Action Plan

Management concurs with the condition, context, and recommendations. Caseworker level audits utilizing an eligibility checklist are required upon case completion. This is tested in the second party review process. Refresher training will be conducted on the requirements of the checklist of items.

About Eligibility →
2019-004
Eligibility
QUESTIONED COSTS

Information on the federal program: Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF), CFDA 93.558, U.S.Department of Health and Human Services, passed through the N.C Department of Health and HumanServices, Division of Social Services.Criteria or specific requirement: Per the North Carolina TANF Program (Work First Program) ComplianceSupplement and the DSS manuals, the family?s net earned and unearned income are deducted from theNeed Standard for the number of assistance unit members. The payment is one-half the difference.Conditions: We noted that in two instances a families monthly benefit check was larger than the calculatedstandard payment amount they should have received.Questioned cost: The known questioned cost was $100.Context: We sampled 93 payments from a total population of 5,355 payments made to the participantsduring the fiscal year. We noted the above condition in 2 of the 93 case files inspected for applicablepayments. The families received benefits that where considered ineligible for a one to six month period.Effect: Individuals received larger monthly benefit payments than allowed. The known questioned cost was$100.Cause: Countable income was incorrectly recorded in NCFAST resulting in an inaccurate needs calculation.Recommendation: We recommend that the County train and monitor employees on the eligibilitydetermination process. We also recommend that caseworkers understand how the benefits are calculatedand determined and that the appropriate amounts are used to calculate benefits.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Information on the federal program: Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF), CFDA 93.558, U.S.Department of Health and Human Services, passed through the N.C Department of Health and HumanServices, Division of Social Services.Criteria or specific requirement: Per the North Carolina TANF Program (Work First Program) ComplianceSupplement and the DSS manuals, the family?s net earned and unearned income are deducted from theNeed Standard for the number of assistance unit members. The payment is one-half the difference.Conditions: We noted that in two instances a families monthly benefit check was larger than the calculatedstandard payment amount they should have received.Questioned cost: The known questioned cost was $100.Context: We sampled 93 payments from a total population of 5,355 payments made to the participantsduring the fiscal year. We noted the above condition in 2 of the 93 case files inspected for applicablepayments. The families received benefits that where considered ineligible for a one to six month period.Effect: Individuals received larger monthly benefit payments than allowed. The known questioned cost was$100.Cause: Countable income was incorrectly recorded in NCFAST resulting in an inaccurate needs calculation.Recommendation: We recommend that the County train and monitor employees on the eligibilitydetermination process. We also recommend that caseworkers understand how the benefits are calculatedand determined and that the appropriate amounts are used to calculate benefits.

Corrective Action Plan

Management concurs with the condition, context, and recommendations. Caseworker level audits utilizing an eligibility checklist are required upon case completion. This is tested in the second party review process. Refresher training will be conducted on the requirements of the checklist of items.

About Eligibility →
2019-005
Cost Allowability

Information on the state program: DSS Crosscutting, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, ChildSupport Enforcement, CFDA 93.563, Temporary Assistance for Needy Families, CFDA 93.558, MedicaidCluster, 93.778..Criteria or specific requirement: Per the North Carolina DSS Crosscutting Supplement and the DSS ServicesInformation System Policy, all employees who provide direct client services during the month mustmaintain day sheets and report 100% of the employee's time.Conditions: We noted one instance where a County Human Services employee, who provides direct clientservices, did not report 100% of their time for the month.Context: We inspected the day sheets of 46 employees supporting the time recorded on Part I of the DSS-1571 for the months of July 2018, October 2018, and May 2019 and noted the condition above in oneinstance.Effect: Day sheets not containing all required employee time results in a risk that the County could requestreimbursement for wages that are not allowable for reimbursement. Subsequent to being notified thatrequired documentation had not been retained, the County was able to provide documentation tosubstantiate that the employee had worked the appropriate amount of hours for reimbursement.Cause: The County did not have adequate internal controls in place related to the submission and approvalof employee's time to ensure its completeness.Recommendation: We recommend that the County implement or revise policies and procedures in placeover DSS 1571 - Part I to ensure that 100% of all employee time is recorded on Day Sheets prior to theapproval reimbursement.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Information on the state program: DSS Crosscutting, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, ChildSupport Enforcement, CFDA 93.563, Temporary Assistance for Needy Families, CFDA 93.558, MedicaidCluster, 93.778..Criteria or specific requirement: Per the North Carolina DSS Crosscutting Supplement and the DSS ServicesInformation System Policy, all employees who provide direct client services during the month mustmaintain day sheets and report 100% of the employee's time.Conditions: We noted one instance where a County Human Services employee, who provides direct clientservices, did not report 100% of their time for the month.Context: We inspected the day sheets of 46 employees supporting the time recorded on Part I of the DSS-1571 for the months of July 2018, October 2018, and May 2019 and noted the condition above in oneinstance.Effect: Day sheets not containing all required employee time results in a risk that the County could requestreimbursement for wages that are not allowable for reimbursement. Subsequent to being notified thatrequired documentation had not been retained, the County was able to provide documentation tosubstantiate that the employee had worked the appropriate amount of hours for reimbursement.Cause: The County did not have adequate internal controls in place related to the submission and approvalof employee's time to ensure its completeness.Recommendation: We recommend that the County implement or revise policies and procedures in placeover DSS 1571 - Part I to ensure that 100% of all employee time is recorded on Day Sheets prior to theapproval reimbursement.

Corrective Action Plan

anagement concurs with the condition, context, and recommendations. County will revise and implement policies and procedures for monitoring daysheet entries. Security officer will note required number of minutes for the month on home page of daysheet program.Daysheet monitoring has been incorporated as a County Performance measure for FY20 to ensure compliance.

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2017-06-30

FAC accepted this audit on December 12, 2017 — management decision was due June 12, 2018.

2017-001
Eligibility
MATERIAL WEAKNESSREPEAT

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2016-002

About Eligibility →
2017-002
Eligibility
MATERIAL WEAKNESSREPEAT

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2016-001

About Eligibility →

FY 2016-06-30

FAC accepted this audit on January 9, 2017 — management decision was due July 9, 2017.

2016-001
Other
MATERIAL WEAKNESS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Other →
2016-002
Eligibility
MATERIAL WEAKNESS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Eligibility →
2016-003
Eligibility
MATERIAL WEAKNESSQUESTIONED COSTS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Eligibility →
2016-004
Eligibility
MATERIAL WEAKNESSQUESTIONED COSTS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Eligibility →
2016-006
Other
MATERIAL WEAKNESSQUESTIONED COSTS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Other →
2016-007
Other
MATERIAL WEAKNESS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Other →
2016-008
Eligibility
MATERIAL WEAKNESS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Eligibility →
2016-009
Eligibility
MATERIAL WEAKNESSQUESTIONED COSTS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Eligibility →
2016-010
Eligibility
MATERIAL WEAKNESS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Eligibility →
2016-011
Eligibility
MATERIAL WEAKNESSQUESTIONED COSTS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Eligibility →
2016-012
Other

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Other →
2016-013
Other

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Other →

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and compliance status.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.