EIN: 526001035
UEI: H5NPA6BV2363
Data as of August 24, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on January 10, 2025. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by July 10, 2025 (411 days ago).
What is a management decision? →During our testing, we noted the School Board did not have adequate internal controls designed to ensure vendors were not suspended or debarred. Questioned Costs: None noted. Context: The School Board could not provide documentation for one out of four vendors regarding ensuring the vendor was not suspended or debarred at the time of contract. Cause: The Board’s procedures and internal controls over suspension and debarment were not sufficient to ensure that all vendors’ suspension and debarment status was verified timely. Effect: Failure to verify the suspension and debarment status of vendors may result in the procurement of goods or services from vendors that are suspended or debarred and result in unallowable expenditures charged to the program. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the Board review its policies and procedures to ensure they include the three options for determining suspension and debarment status listed in 2 CFR 180.300 and that controls are sufficient to ensure that the suspension and debarment status is verified for all vendors prior to entering into covered transactions. Views of responsible officials: Management acknowledges the finding. Current procedures mandate suspension and debarment verification prior to entering into contracts or agreements with vendors. However, due to the timing of the policy implementation, there were vendor contracts executed and payments processed after the prior year's finding but before corrective action could be implemented.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Federal Program Name: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recover Funds Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Not Available Pass-Through Agency: Maryland State Department of Education Pass-Through Number: 211851 Award Period: 3.3.2921-12.31.2024 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Control over Compliance, Material Noncompliance (Modified Opinion) Criteria or Specific Requirement: Compliance: Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. 2 CFR 180.300 states that an entity may determine suspension and debarment status by: (a) Checking SAM (System for Award Management) Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. Control: Per 2 CFR section 200.303(a), a non-Federal entity must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. These internal controls should comply with the guidance in "Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government" issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the "Internal Control-Integrated Framework," issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition: During our testing, we noted the School Board did not have adequate internal controls designed to ensure vendors were not suspended or debarred. Questioned Costs: None noted. Context: The School Board could not provide documentation for one out of four vendors regarding ensuring the vendor was not suspended or debarred at the time of contract. Cause: The Board’s procedures and internal controls over suspension and debarment were not sufficient to ensure that all vendors’ suspension and debarment status was verified timely. Effect: Failure to verify the suspension and debarment status of vendors may result in the procurement of goods or services from vendors that are suspended or debarred and result in unallowable expenditures charged to the program. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the Board review its policies and procedures to ensure they include the three options for determining suspension and debarment status listed in 2 CFR 180.300 and that controls are sufficient to ensure that the suspension and debarment status is verified for all vendors prior to entering into covered transactions. Views of responsible officials: Management acknowledges the finding. Current procedures mandate suspension and debarment verification prior to entering into contracts or agreements with vendors. However, due to the timing of the policy implementation, there were vendor contracts executed and payments processed after the prior year's finding but before corrective action could be implemented.
Finding Number: 2024-002 Prior Year Finding: Yes Federal Agency: US Department of Treasury Federal Program: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Assistance Listing: 21.027 Pass-Through Entity: Maryland Statement Department of Education Pass-Through Award Number and Period: 211851 (3/3/2021 – 12/31/2024) Compliance Requirement: Suspension and Debarment Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Recommendation We recommend that the Board review its policies and procedures to ensure they include the three options for determining suspension and debarment status listed in 2 CFR 180.300 and that controls are sufficient to ensure that the suspension and debarment status is verified for all vendors prior to entering into covered transactions. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. However, WCPS did adjust our practices during fiscal year 2024 based on guidance from our previous audit firm to add the suspension and debarment affidavit to all new vendor registrations and service contracts. Action taken in response to finding: Effective immediately, the Purchasing Department will review all requisitions that are going against Fund 02 (Restricted Fund) and ensure that the vendor has been checked for suspension/debarment. New vendors are required to sign an affidavit that they have not been suspended or debarred. This check will ensure that old vendors that were in place prior to the FY 2023 finding have been validated against SAM.GOV or have a signed affidavit to ensure they have not been suspended or debarred. We will also be sending emails to our current vendors to ensure that we have a signed affidavit on file. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Adam Pelc, Supervisor of Accounting and Scott Bachtell, Supervisor of Purchasing Planned completion date for corrective action plan: For immediate implementation and ongoing.
During our testing, we noted the School Board did not have adequate internal controls designed to ensure vendors were not suspended or debarred. Questioned Costs: None noted. Context: The School Board could not provide documentation for one out of four vendors regarding ensuring the vendor was not suspended or debarred at the time of contract. Cause: The Board's procedures and internal controls over suspension and debarment were not sufficient to ensure that all vendors' suspension and debarment status was verified timely. Effect: Failure to verify the suspension and debarment status of vendors may result in the procurement of goods or services from vendors that are suspended or debarred and result in unallowable expenditures charged to the program. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the Board review its policies and procedures to ensure they include the three options for determining suspension and debarment status listed in 2 CFR 180.300 and that controls are sufficient to ensure that the suspension and debarment status is verified for all vendors prior to entering into covered transactions. Views of responsible officials: Management acknowledges the finding. Current procedures mandate suspension and debarment verification prior to entering into contracts or agreements with vendors. However, due to the timing of the policy implementation, there were vendor contracts executed and payments processed after the prior year's finding but before corrective action could be implemented.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Federal Program Name: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Number: 21 .027 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Not Available Pass-Through Agency: Maryland State Department of Education Pass-Through Number: 211851 Award Period: 3/3/2021 - 12/31/2024 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Control over Compliance, Material Noncompliance (Modified Opinion) Criteria or Specific Requirement: Compliance: Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. "Covered transactions" include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. 2 CFR 180.300 states that an entity may determine suspension and debarment status by: (a) Checking SAM (System for Award Management) Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. Control: Per 2 CFR section 200.303(a), a non-Federal entity must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. These internal controls should comply with the guidance in "Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government" issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the "Internal Control-Integrated Framework," issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition: During our testing, we noted the School Board did not have adequate internal controls designed to ensure vendors were not suspended or debarred. Questioned Costs: None noted. Context: The School Board could not provide documentation for one out of four vendors regarding ensuring the vendor was not suspended or debarred at the time of contract. Cause: The Board's procedures and internal controls over suspension and debarment were not sufficient to ensure that all vendors' suspension and debarment status was verified timely. Effect: Failure to verify the suspension and debarment status of vendors may result in the procurement of goods or services from vendors that are suspended or debarred and result in unallowable expenditures charged to the program. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the Board review its policies and procedures to ensure they include the three options for determining suspension and debarment status listed in 2 CFR 180.300 and that controls are sufficient to ensure that the suspension and debarment status is verified for all vendors prior to entering into covered transactions. Views of responsible officials: Management acknowledges the finding. Current procedures mandate suspension and debarment verification prior to entering into contracts or agreements with vendors. However, due to the timing of the policy implementation, there were vendor contracts executed and payments processed after the prior year's finding but before corrective action could be implemented.
Prior Year Finding: No Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Federal Program: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Assistance Listing: 21.027 Pass-Through Entity: Maryland State Department of Education Pass-Through Award Number and Period: 211851 (3/3/2021 -12/31/2024) Compliance Requirement: Suspension and Debarment Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Recommendation We recommend that the Board review its policies and procedures to ensure they include the three options for determining suspension and debarment status listed in 2 CFR 180.300 and that controls are sufficient to ensure that the suspension and debarment status is verified for all vendors prior to entering into covered transactions. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. However, WCPS did adjust our practices during fiscal year 2024 based on guidance from our previous audit firm to add the suspension and debarment affidavit to all new vendor registrations and service contracts. Action taken in response to finding: Effective immediately, the Purchasing Department will review all requisitions that are going against Fund 02 (Restricted Fund) and ensure that the vendor has been checked for suspension/debarment. New vendors are required to sign an affidavit that they have not been suspended or debarred. This check will ensure that old vendors that were in place prior to the FY 2023 finding have been validated against SAM.GOV or have a signed affidavit to ensure they have not been suspended or debarred. We will also be sending emails to our current vendors to ensure that we have a signed affidavit on file. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Adam Pelc, Supervisor of Accounting and Scott Bachtell, Supervisor of Purchasing Planned completion date for corrective action plan: For immediate implementation and ongoing.
During our testing, we noted the School Board did not have adequate internal controls designed to ensure vendors were not suspended or debarred. Questioned Costs: None Noted Context: The School Board could not provide documentation for two out of four vendors regarding ensuring the vendor was not suspended or debarred at the time of contract. Cause: The Board’s procedures and internal controls over suspension and debarment were not sufficient to ensure that all vendors’ suspension and debarment status was verified timely. Effect: Failure to verify the suspension and debarment status of vendors may result in the procurement of goods or services from vendors that are suspended or debarred and result in unallowable expenditures charged to the program. Repeat Finding: The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-001. Recommendation: We recommend that the Board review its policies and procedures to ensure they include the three options for determining suspension and debarment status listed in 2 CFR 180.300 and that controls are sufficient to ensure that the suspension and debarment status is verified for all vendors prior to entering into covered transactions. Views of responsible officials: Management acknowledges the finding. Current procedures mandate suspension and debarment verification prior to entering into contracts or agreements with vendors. However, due to the timing of the policy implementation, there were vendor contracts executed and payments processed after the prior year's finding but before corrective action could be implemented.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Federal Program Name: Special Education Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 84.027 and 84.173 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: H027A220035 Pass-Through Agency: Maryland State Department of Education Pass-Through Number: 231072 Award Period: 10/1/2022 - 9/30/2024 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Control over Compliance, Material Noncompliance (Modified Opinion) Criteria or Specific Requirement: Compliance: Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. 2 CFR 180.300 states that an entity may determine suspension and debarment status by: (a) Checking SAM (System for Award Management) Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person Control: Per 2 CFR section 200.303(a), a non-Federal entity must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. These internal controls should comply with the guidance in "Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government" issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the "Internal Control-Integrated Framework," issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition: During our testing, we noted the School Board did not have adequate internal controls designed to ensure vendors were not suspended or debarred. Questioned Costs: None Noted Context: The School Board could not provide documentation for two out of four vendors regarding ensuring the vendor was not suspended or debarred at the time of contract. Cause: The Board’s procedures and internal controls over suspension and debarment were not sufficient to ensure that all vendors’ suspension and debarment status was verified timely. Effect: Failure to verify the suspension and debarment status of vendors may result in the procurement of goods or services from vendors that are suspended or debarred and result in unallowable expenditures charged to the program. Repeat Finding: The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-001. Recommendation: We recommend that the Board review its policies and procedures to ensure they include the three options for determining suspension and debarment status listed in 2 CFR 180.300 and that controls are sufficient to ensure that the suspension and debarment status is verified for all vendors prior to entering into covered transactions. Views of responsible officials: Management acknowledges the finding. Current procedures mandate suspension and debarment verification prior to entering into contracts or agreements with vendors. However, due to the timing of the policy implementation, there were vendor contracts executed and payments processed after the prior year's finding but before corrective action could be implemented.
Finding Number: 2024-003 Prior Year Finding: Yes Federal Agency: US Department of Education Federal Program: Special Education Grants to States Assistance Listing: 84.027 Pass-Through Entity: Maryland Statement Department of Education Pass-Through Award Number and Period: 231072 10/1/22 - 9/30/24 Compliance Requirement: Suspension and Debarment Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Recommendation We recommend that the Board review its policies and procedures to ensure they include the three options for determining suspension and debarment status listed in 2 CFR 180.300 and that controls are sufficient to ensure that the suspension and debarment status is verified for all vendors prior to entering into covered transactions. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. However, WCPS did adjust our practices during fiscal year 2024 based on guidance from our previous audit firm to add the suspension and debarment affidavit to all new vendor registrations and service contracts. Action taken in response to finding: Effective immediately, the Purchasing Department will review all requisitions that are going against Fund 02 (Restricted Fund) and ensure that the vendor has been checked for suspension/debarment. New vendors are required to sign an affidavit that they have not been suspended or debarred. This check will ensure that old vendors that were in place prior to the FY 2023 finding have been validated against SAM.GOV or have a signed affidavit to ensure they have not been suspended or debarred. We will also be sending emails to our current vendors to ensure that we have a signed affidavit on file. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Adam Pelc, Supervisor of Accounting and Scott Bachtell, Supervisor of Purchasing Planned completion date for corrective action plan: For immediate implementation and ongoing.
2023-001
During our testing, we noted the School Board did not have adequate internal controls designed to ensure vendors were not suspended or debarred. Questioned Costs: None noted. Context: The School Board could not provide documentation for two out of four vendors regarding ensuring the vendor was not suspended or debarred at the time of contract. Cause: The Board's procedures and internal controls over suspension and debarment were not sufficient to ensure that all vendors' suspension and debarment status was verified timely. Effect: Failure to verify the suspension and debarment status of vendors may result in the procurement of goods or services from vendors that are suspended or debarred and result in unallowable expenditures charged to the program. Repeat Finding: The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-001. Recommendation: We recommend that the Board review its policies and procedures to ensure they include the three options for determining suspension and debarment status listed in 2 CFR 180.300 and that controls are sufficient to ensure that the suspension and debarment status is verified for all vendors prior to entering into covered transactions. Views of responsible officials: Management acknowledges the finding. Current procedures mandate suspension and debarment verification prior to entering into contracts or agreements with vendors. However, due to the timing of the policy implementation, there were vendor contracts executed and payments processed after the prior year's finding but before corrective action could be implemented.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Federal Program Name: Special Education Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 84.027 and 84.173 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: H027A220035 Pass-Through Agency: Maryland State Department of Education Pass-Through Number: 231072 Award Period: 10/1/2022 - 9/30/2024 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Control over Compliance, Material Noncompliance (Modified Opinion) Criteria or Specific Requirement: Compliance: Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. "Covered transactions" include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. 2 CFR 180.300 states that an entity may determine suspension and debarment status by: (a) Checking SAM (System for Award Management) Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. Control: Per 2 CFR section 200.303(a), a non-Federal entity must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. These internal controls should comply with the guidance in "Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government" issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the "Internal Control-Integrated Framework," issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition: During our testing, we noted the School Board did not have adequate internal controls designed to ensure vendors were not suspended or debarred. Questioned Costs: None noted. Context: The School Board could not provide documentation for two out of four vendors regarding ensuring the vendor was not suspended or debarred at the time of contract. Cause: The Board's procedures and internal controls over suspension and debarment were not sufficient to ensure that all vendors' suspension and debarment status was verified timely. Effect: Failure to verify the suspension and debarment status of vendors may result in the procurement of goods or services from vendors that are suspended or debarred and result in unallowable expenditures charged to the program. Repeat Finding: The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-001. Recommendation: We recommend that the Board review its policies and procedures to ensure they include the three options for determining suspension and debarment status listed in 2 CFR 180.300 and that controls are sufficient to ensure that the suspension and debarment status is verified for all vendors prior to entering into covered transactions. Views of responsible officials: Management acknowledges the finding. Current procedures mandate suspension and debarment verification prior to entering into contracts or agreements with vendors. However, due to the timing of the policy implementation, there were vendor contracts executed and payments processed after the prior year's finding but before corrective action could be implemented.
Prior Year Finding: Yes Federal Agency: US Department of Education Federal Program: Special Education Grants to States Assistance Listing: 84.027 Pass-Through Entity: Maryland State Department of Education Pass-Through Award Number and Period: 231072 (10/1/2022 - 9/30/2024) Compliance Requirement: Suspension and Debarment Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Recommendation We recommend that the Board review its policies and procedures to ensure they include the three options for determining suspension and debarment status listed in 2 CFR 180.300 and that controls are sufficient to ensure that the suspension and debarment status is verified for all vendors prior to entering into covered transactions. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. However, WCPS did adjust our practices during fiscal year 2024 based on guidance from our previous audit firm to add the suspension and debarment affidavit to all new vendor registrations and service contracts. Action taken in response to finding: Effective immediately, the Purchasing Department will review all requisitions that are going against Fund 02 (Restricted Fund) and ensure that the vendor has been checked for suspension/debarment. New vendors are required to sign an affidavit that they have not been suspended or debarred. This check will ensure that old vendors that were in place prior to the FY 2023 finding have been validated against SAM.GOV or have a signed affidavit to ensure they have not been suspended or debarred. We will also be sending emails to our current vendors to ensure that we have a signed affidavit on file. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Adam Pelc, Supervisor of Accounting and Scott Bachtell, Supervisor of Purchasing Planned completion date for corrective action plan: For immediate implementation and ongoing.
2023-001
During our testing, we noted the School Board did not have adequate internal controls designed to ensure vendors were in compliance with applicable Davis-Bacon Wage Rate requirements. Questioned Costs: There are no questioned costs related to this finding. Context: The School Board did not retain documentation supporting indication of their review of certified payroll records in accordance with monitoring compliance with the Davis-Bacon Act requirements for contracts funded by the Education Stabilization Fund. Additionally, for one out of twenty-two payroll periods tested, the School Board was not able to provide payroll documentation certified by the vendor. Cause: The Board’s procedures and internal controls over monitoring Davis-Bacon Act compliance were not sufficiently designed or implemented to ensure that wage determinations were verified and that contractors and subcontractors were monitored for compliance. Effect: Failure to monitor Davis-Bacon wage requirements may result in noncompliance with federal labor standards and could potentially lead to financial penalties, reputational damage, and a loss of future federal funding. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the Board enhance its policies and procedures to ensure the effective monitoring of compliance with Davis-Bacon wage requirements. Procedures should include regular verification of wage determinations, monitoring of contractor and subcontractor payrolls, and documentation of compliance efforts. Views of responsible officials: Management acknowledges the finding and agrees with the recommendation and will implement corrective action.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Federal Program Name: Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listing Number: 84.425 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: S45U210005 Pass-Through Agency: Maryland State Department of Education Pass-Through Number: 211935 Award Period: 3/24/2021 - 9/30/2023 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance, Other Matters Criteria or Specific Requirement: Compliance: The Davis-Bacon Act requires that laborers and mechanics employed by contractors and subcontractors in the performance of federally funded or assisted contracts in excess of $2,000 for construction, alteration, or repair (including painting and decorating) of public buildings or public works must be paid wages not less than those established by the Secretary of Labor. Adequate monitoring of compliance with these wage requirements is required to ensure that workers are being paid correctly as per 29 CFR 5.5 compliance provisions. Control: Per 2 CFR section 200.303(a), a non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should comply with the guidance in "Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government" issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the "Internal Control-Integrated Framework," issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition: During our testing, we noted the School Board did not have adequate internal controls designed to ensure vendors were in compliance with applicable Davis-Bacon Wage Rate requirements. Questioned Costs: There are no questioned costs related to this finding. Context: The School Board did not retain documentation supporting indication of their review of certified payroll records in accordance with monitoring compliance with the Davis-Bacon Act requirements for contracts funded by the Education Stabilization Fund. Additionally, for one out of twenty-two payroll periods tested, the School Board was not able to provide payroll documentation certified by the vendor. Cause: The Board’s procedures and internal controls over monitoring Davis-Bacon Act compliance were not sufficiently designed or implemented to ensure that wage determinations were verified and that contractors and subcontractors were monitored for compliance. Effect: Failure to monitor Davis-Bacon wage requirements may result in noncompliance with federal labor standards and could potentially lead to financial penalties, reputational damage, and a loss of future federal funding. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the Board enhance its policies and procedures to ensure the effective monitoring of compliance with Davis-Bacon wage requirements. Procedures should include regular verification of wage determinations, monitoring of contractor and subcontractor payrolls, and documentation of compliance efforts. Views of responsible officials: Management acknowledges the finding and agrees with the recommendation and will implement corrective action.
Finding Number: 2024-004 Prior Year Finding: No Federal Agency: US Department of Education Federal Program: Eduation Stabilization Fund Assistance Listing: 84.425 Pass-Through Entity: Maryland Statement Department of Education Pass-Through Award Number and Period: 211935 3/24/21 - 9/30/23 Compliance Requirement: Davis-Bacon Act Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance, Other Matters Recommendation We recommend that the Board enhance its policies and procedures to ensure the effective monitoring of compliance with Davis-Bacon wage requirements. Procedures should include regular verification of wage determinations, monitoring of contractor and subcontractor payrolls, and documentation of compliance efforts. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: Effective immediately, we will start recording on a spreadsheet the Contract number and weeks covered for certified payrolls we receive that falls under the Davis-Bacon Act. This spreadsheet will have an approval column and date column to document our monitoring procedures for tracking and audit purposes. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Adam Pelc, Supervisor of Accounting and Rob Rollins, Director of Facilities Planned completion date for corrective action plan: For immediate implementation and ongoing.
During our testing, we noted the School Board did not have adequate internal controls designed to ensure vendors were in compliance with applicable Davis-Bacon Wage Rate requirements. Questioned Costs: There are no questioned costs related to this finding. Context: The School Board did not retain documentation supporting indication of their review of certified payroll records in accordance with monitoring compliance with the Davis-Bacon Act requirements for contracts funded by the Education Stabilization Fund. Additionally, for one out of twenty-two payroll periods tested, the School Board was not able to provide payroll documentation certified by the vendor. Cause: The Board's procedures and internal controls over monitoring Davis-Bacon Act compliance were not sufficiently designed or implemented to ensure that wage determinations were verified and that contractors and subcontractors were monitored for compliance. Effect: Failure to monitor Davis-Bacon wage requirements may result in noncompliance with federal labor standards and could potentially lead to financial penalties, reputational damage, and a loss of future federal funding. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the Board enhance its policies and procedures to ensure the effective monitoring of compliance with Davis-Bacon wage requirements. Procedures should include regular verification of wage determinations, monitoring of contractor and subcontractor payrolls, and documentation of compliance efforts. Views of responsible officials: Management acknowledges the finding and agrees with the recommendation and will implement corrective action.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Federal Program Name: Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listing Number: 84.425 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: S45U210005 Pass-Through Agency: Maryland State Department of Education Pass-Through Number: 211935 Award Period: 3/24/2021 - 9/30/2023 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance, Other Matters Criteria or Specific Requirement: Compliance: The Davis-Bacon Act requires that laborers and mechanics employed by contractors and subcontractors in the performance of federally funded or assisted contracts in excess of $2,000 for construction, alteration, or repair (including painting and decorating) of public buildings or public works must be paid wages not less than those established by the Secretary of Labor. Adequate monitoring of compliance with these wage requirements is required to ensure that workers are being paid correctly as per 29 CFR 5.5 compliance provisions. Control: Per 2 CFR section 200.303(a), a non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should comply with the guidance in "Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government" issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the "Internal Control-Integrated Framework," issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition: During our testing, we noted the School Board did not have adequate internal controls designed to ensure vendors were in compliance with applicable Davis-Bacon Wage Rate requirements. Questioned Costs: There are no questioned costs related to this finding. Context: The School Board did not retain documentation supporting indication of their review of certified payroll records in accordance with monitoring compliance with the Davis-Bacon Act requirements for contracts funded by the Education Stabilization Fund. Additionally, for one out of twenty-two payroll periods tested, the School Board was not able to provide payroll documentation certified by the vendor. Cause: The Board's procedures and internal controls over monitoring Davis-Bacon Act compliance were not sufficiently designed or implemented to ensure that wage determinations were verified and that contractors and subcontractors were monitored for compliance. Effect: Failure to monitor Davis-Bacon wage requirements may result in noncompliance with federal labor standards and could potentially lead to financial penalties, reputational damage, and a loss of future federal funding. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the Board enhance its policies and procedures to ensure the effective monitoring of compliance with Davis-Bacon wage requirements. Procedures should include regular verification of wage determinations, monitoring of contractor and subcontractor payrolls, and documentation of compliance efforts. Views of responsible officials: Management acknowledges the finding and agrees with the recommendation and will implement corrective action.
Prior Year Finding: No Federal Agency: US Department of Education Federal Program: Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listing: 84.425 Pass-Through Entity: Maryland State Department of Education Pass-Through Award Number and Period: 211935 (3/24/2021 - 9/30/2023) Compliance Requirement: Davis-Bacon Act Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance, Other Matters Recommendation We recommend that the Board enhance its policies and procedures to ensure the effective monitoring of compliance with Davis-Bacon wage requirements. Procedures should include regular verification of wage determinations, monitoring of contractor and subcontractor payrolls, and documentation of compliance efforts. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: Effective immediately, we will start recording on a spreadsheet the Contract number and weeks covered for certified payrolls we receive that falls under the Davis-Bacon Act. This spreadsheet will have an approval column and date column to document our monitoring procedures for tracking and audit purposes. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Adam Pelc, Supervisor of Accounting and Rob Rollins, Director of Facilities Planned completion date for corrective action plan: For immediate implementation and ongoing.
FAC accepted this audit on January 11, 2024 — management decision was due July 11, 2024.
For 2 out of 3 service contracts tested, we noted that the School System entered into a contract without performing procedures to ensure that the entity was not suspended or debarred when service contracts are contracted outside the competitive bidding process. Cause: The School System does not have adequate procedures in place to ensure controls over Federal Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirements are operating effectively. Effect: Adequate internal controls are not in place over Federal Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirements.Questioned Costs: None. Recommendation: Procedures should be implemented to ensure that contractors are neither suspended nor debarred prior to entering into a contract. School System’s Response: The School System currently has a system in place to ensure contractors are not suspended or debarred for all purchases made through the competitive bidding process. Although not required to solicit bids for service contracts, the School System chooses to do so whenever possible. The contracts tested involve service contracts that were not run though the competitive bidding process to fulfill a need beyond what could be met by then-awarded providers. The School System will update its procurement procedures to ensure that a service provider is neither suspended nor debarred prior to entering into any contract that is not subject to the competitive bidding process. The School System will ensure that all required components are included within the contract. The Supervisor of Purchasing, or his designee, will use the System for Award Management Exclusions to verify that the provider is not suspended, debarred or otherwise excluded from doing business with the government and will require an affirmation from the provider regarding non-suspension or debarment. The School System will have this in place before the June 30, 2024 audit.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴ALN 84.027 and 84.173 Special Education Cluster (IDEA)Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 180.30, the School System is required to perform procedures to ensure that contractors are neither suspended nor debarred prior to entering into a contract to procure goods and services. This may be accomplished by checking the System for Award Management Exclusions, collecting a certification from the entity, or adding a clause or condition to the contract with the entity. Condition: For 2 out of 3 service contracts tested, we noted that the School System entered into a contract without performing procedures to ensure that the entity was not suspended or debarred when service contracts are contracted outside the competitive bidding process. Cause: The School System does not have adequate procedures in place to ensure controls over Federal Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirements are operating effectively. Effect: Adequate internal controls are not in place over Federal Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirements.Questioned Costs: None. Recommendation: Procedures should be implemented to ensure that contractors are neither suspended nor debarred prior to entering into a contract. School System’s Response: The School System currently has a system in place to ensure contractors are not suspended or debarred for all purchases made through the competitive bidding process. Although not required to solicit bids for service contracts, the School System chooses to do so whenever possible. The contracts tested involve service contracts that were not run though the competitive bidding process to fulfill a need beyond what could be met by then-awarded providers. The School System will update its procurement procedures to ensure that a service provider is neither suspended nor debarred prior to entering into any contract that is not subject to the competitive bidding process. The School System will ensure that all required components are included within the contract. The Supervisor of Purchasing, or his designee, will use the System for Award Management Exclusions to verify that the provider is not suspended, debarred or otherwise excluded from doing business with the government and will require an affirmation from the provider regarding non-suspension or debarment. The School System will have this in place before the June 30, 2024 audit.
The School system currently has a system in place to ensure contractors are not suspended or debarred for all purchases made through the competitive bidding process. Although not required to solicit bids for service contracts, the School System chooses to do so whenever possible. The contracts tested involve service contracts that were not run though the competitive bidding process to fulfill a need beyond what could be met by then-awarded providers. The School System will update its procurement procedures to ensure that a service provider is neither suspended nor debarred prior to entering into any contract that is not subject to the competitive bidding process. The School System will ensure that all required components are included within the contract. The Supervisor of Purchasing, or his designee, will use the System for Award Management Exclusions to verify that the provider is not suspended, debarred or otherwise excluded from doing business with the government and will require an affirmation from the provider regarding non-suspension or debarment. The School System will have this in place before the June 30, 2024 audit.
FAC accepted this audit on October 18, 2016 — management decision was due April 18, 2017.
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Monitor subrecipient audit findings and compliance status.
Start monitoring →© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.