Howard County Economic Development Authority

EIN: 521854917

UEI: NHCNFJ2N1AJ8

Data as of August 27, 2026

Howard County Economic Development Authority1 audit years3 findings
1
Audit Years
3
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings

FY 2025-06-30

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on March 23, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by September 23, 2026 (27 days from today).

What is a management decision? →
2025-001
Procurement & Suspension/Debarment

during our fiscal year 2025 compliance audit, we noted that the Authority awarded all twenty-seven (27) subawards without checking for suspension and debarment. Context: The Authority awarded twenty-seven (27) subawards during fiscal year 2025 totaling $1,000,000, which represents over 99% of the total federal expenditures during fiscal year 2025. Cause: The Authority did not establish controls to check for suspension and debarment before awarding contracts. The Authority was also not aware of the fact that they had to check for suspension and debarment. Effect: As a result of not checking for suspension and debarment, awards may have been made to organizations that are not eligible. Identification as a Repeat Finding, if Applicable: No. Questioned Costs: None identified.Recommendation: We recommend the Authority evaluate its policies and procedures to ensure that suspension and debarment requirements are being met prior to entering into covered transactions. Policies and procedures should reiterate the three options for determining suspension and debarment status listed in 2 CFR 180.300. Responsible Official: Controller Views of Responsible Official and Planned Corrective Action: Management concurs with the audit finding. See the accompanying management’s corrective action plan for planned corrective action.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding Reference Number: 2025-001 Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Name of Pass-through Entity: Howard County Government Program Title: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund Federal Award No.: 02-11-0-D000-0237 Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Federal Award Year: 2024-2025 Compliance Requirement: Suspension and debarment Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Compliance, Other Matters Criteria: Per 2 CFR 200.213 Suspension and Debarment restricts awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. 2 CFR 180.300 states that an entity may determine suspension and debarment status by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. Per 2 CFR section 200.303(a), a non-Federal entity must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework,” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition: during our fiscal year 2025 compliance audit, we noted that the Authority awarded all twenty-seven (27) subawards without checking for suspension and debarment. Context: The Authority awarded twenty-seven (27) subawards during fiscal year 2025 totaling $1,000,000, which represents over 99% of the total federal expenditures during fiscal year 2025. Cause: The Authority did not establish controls to check for suspension and debarment before awarding contracts. The Authority was also not aware of the fact that they had to check for suspension and debarment. Effect: As a result of not checking for suspension and debarment, awards may have been made to organizations that are not eligible. Identification as a Repeat Finding, if Applicable: No. Questioned Costs: None identified.Recommendation: We recommend the Authority evaluate its policies and procedures to ensure that suspension and debarment requirements are being met prior to entering into covered transactions. Policies and procedures should reiterate the three options for determining suspension and debarment status listed in 2 CFR 180.300. Responsible Official: Controller Views of Responsible Official and Planned Corrective Action: Management concurs with the audit finding. See the accompanying management’s corrective action plan for planned corrective action.

Corrective Action Plan

We agree with the auditor's comments. While we have retroactively searched for suspension and debarment, not all subrecipients were able to finalize their registration on SAM.gov. We determined that 7 of the 27 recipients were confirmed to have no suspension or debarment, totaling $514,450 of the grant total. Our office of Law has drafted and amendment to the agreement that requires the subrecipient certify that they have not been suspended or debarred. We will have each subrecipient sign the amendment. We anticipate completion of this by March 31, 2026.

About Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →
2025-002
Reporting

during our fiscal year 2025 compliance audit, we noted that the Authority did not submit two out of the four quarterly detailed expense list per childcare provider report selected for testing. Context: The Authority is required to submit (4) quarterly project and expenditure report and (4) quarterly detailed expense list per childcare provider. While the quarterly project and expenditure reports were submitted timely, the authority did not prepare and submit the quarterly detailed expense list per childcare provider reports. Cause: The Authority did not have proper internal controls to ensure that all required reports were submitted timely to the grantor. Effect: As a result, the authority did not prepare and submit the quarterly detailed expense list per childcare provider reports timely. Identification as a Repeat Finding, if Applicable: No. Questioned Costs: None identified. Recommendation: We recommend the Authority evaluate its policies and procedures to ensure that it complies with the reporting requirements of the grant. Responsible Official: Controller Views of Responsible Official and Planned Corrective Action: Management concurs with the audit finding. See the accompanying management’s corrective action plan for planned corrective action.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding Reference Number: 2025-002 Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Name of Pass-through Entity: Howard County Government Program Title: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund Federal Award No.: 02-11-0-D000-0237 Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Federal Award Year: 2024-2025 Compliance Requirement: Reporting Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Compliance, Other Matters Criteria: Non-Federal entities are required to comply with the terms of the grant agreement. This includes preparing and submitting all required reports in a timely manner. Per 2 CFR section 200.303(a), a non-Federal entity must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework,” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition: during our fiscal year 2025 compliance audit, we noted that the Authority did not submit two out of the four quarterly detailed expense list per childcare provider report selected for testing. Context: The Authority is required to submit (4) quarterly project and expenditure report and (4) quarterly detailed expense list per childcare provider. While the quarterly project and expenditure reports were submitted timely, the authority did not prepare and submit the quarterly detailed expense list per childcare provider reports. Cause: The Authority did not have proper internal controls to ensure that all required reports were submitted timely to the grantor. Effect: As a result, the authority did not prepare and submit the quarterly detailed expense list per childcare provider reports timely. Identification as a Repeat Finding, if Applicable: No. Questioned Costs: None identified. Recommendation: We recommend the Authority evaluate its policies and procedures to ensure that it complies with the reporting requirements of the grant. Responsible Official: Controller Views of Responsible Official and Planned Corrective Action: Management concurs with the audit finding. See the accompanying management’s corrective action plan for planned corrective action.

Corrective Action Plan

We agree with the auditor's comments. We have developed a process of reviewing the submitted expense detail reports from the subrecipients and stamping them reviewed through adobe. In future submissions, we will be sure to include the detailed expense report for each subrecipient with this notation. We anticipate completion of this by March 31, 2026.

About Reporting →
2025-003
Subrecipient Monitoring

During our fiscal year 2025 compliance audit, we noted that the Authority awarded all twenty-seven (27) subawards without referring to federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award as described in 2 CFR 200.332(a)(1), 2 CFR 200.332(a)(2), and 2 CFR 200.332(a)(3). Context: The Authority awarded twenty-seven (27) subawards during fiscal year 2025 totaling $1,000,000, which represents over 99% of the total federal expenditures during fiscal year 2025. Cause: The Authority did not have adequate controls to review subaward agreements to ensure all compliance requirements are captured, that information is consistent between pass-through entity records and the subaward, and that all required elements are included. Effect: As a result of not including the proper information in the subaward agreements, the subrecipients may not be able to comply with the terms of the grant agreement and 2 CFR part 200. Identification as a Repeat Finding, if Applicable: No. Questioned Costs: None identified.Recommendation: We recommend the Authority evaluate its policies and procedures to ensure that subaward agreements include all required information as described in 2 CFR 200.332(a)(1), 2 CFR 200.332(a)(2), and 2 CFR 200.332(a)(3). Responsible Official: Controller Views of Responsible Official and Planned Corrective Action: Management concurs with the audit finding. See the accompanying management’s corrective action plan for planned corrective action.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding Reference Number: 2025-003 Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Name of Pass-through Entity: Howard County Government Program Title: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund Federal Award No.: 02-11-0-D000-0237 Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Federal Award Year: 2024-2025 Compliance Requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Compliance, Other Matters Criteria: A pass-through entity (PTE) must Identify the Award and Applicable Requirements – Clearly identify to the subrecipient: (1) the award as a subaward at the time of subaward (or subsequent subaward modification) by providing the information described in 2 CFR 200.332(a)(1); (2) all requirements imposed by the PTE on the subrecipient so that the federal award is used in accordance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award (2 CFR 200.332(a)(2)); and (3) any additional requirements that the PTE imposes on the subrecipient in order for the PTE to meet its own responsibility for the federal award (e.g., financial, performance, and special reports) (2 CFR 200.332(a)(3)). Per 2 CFR section 200.303(a), a non-Federal entity must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework,” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition: During our fiscal year 2025 compliance audit, we noted that the Authority awarded all twenty-seven (27) subawards without referring to federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award as described in 2 CFR 200.332(a)(1), 2 CFR 200.332(a)(2), and 2 CFR 200.332(a)(3). Context: The Authority awarded twenty-seven (27) subawards during fiscal year 2025 totaling $1,000,000, which represents over 99% of the total federal expenditures during fiscal year 2025. Cause: The Authority did not have adequate controls to review subaward agreements to ensure all compliance requirements are captured, that information is consistent between pass-through entity records and the subaward, and that all required elements are included. Effect: As a result of not including the proper information in the subaward agreements, the subrecipients may not be able to comply with the terms of the grant agreement and 2 CFR part 200. Identification as a Repeat Finding, if Applicable: No. Questioned Costs: None identified.Recommendation: We recommend the Authority evaluate its policies and procedures to ensure that subaward agreements include all required information as described in 2 CFR 200.332(a)(1), 2 CFR 200.332(a)(2), and 2 CFR 200.332(a)(3). Responsible Official: Controller Views of Responsible Official and Planned Corrective Action: Management concurs with the audit finding. See the accompanying management’s corrective action plan for planned corrective action.

Corrective Action Plan

We agree with the auditor's comments. The HCEDA has engaged a temporary project manager that is coordinating the collection of quarterly expenses and reports from the subrecipients. Our office of law has drafted an amendment to the agreement that details that the grants were ARPA funds and notes that the subrecipient certifies that they have not been suspended or debarred. This amendment will include an attachment with the complete supplementary conditions applicable to ARPA funded grants. We will have each subrecipient sign the amendment. We anticipate completion of this by March 31, 2026.

About Subrecipient Monitoring →

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and compliance status.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.

Howard County Economic Development Authority - Single Audit | Single Audit Intelligence