EIN: 480990763
UEI: HXTXN7N558V3
Audited by: Allen, Gibbs & Houlik LC
Oversight agency: 93 [Department of Health and Human Services]
View federal awards & risk assessment →
Data as of August 28, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on August 3, 2023. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by February 3, 2024 (937 days ago).
What is a management decision? →The final performance report for the grant year requires the submission of additional performance metrics. The reported metrics included correct underlying data; however, two of the nine required metrics included calculation errors for the grant year ended June 30, 2022. Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303(a) states the Association is required to establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. Questioned Costs: None Context: Only the final performance report was required to have these metrics and the calculations were inaccurate. The sample size was determined based upon guidelines provided by the AICPA which is not a statistically valid sample. Cause: Secondary review of performance calculations were not performed. Effect: Not providing accurate performance metrics may lead to inaccurate conclusions on the program?s effectiveness. Recommendation: We recommend the Association add a secondary review of all reports. Views of Responsible Officials (Unaudited): The agency has put into place a secondary review in which the report is prepared by the Program Coordinator, in conjunction with the Administrative Assistant, and then reviewed for accuracy by the Senior Director of Grants and Aging. Additionally, the Senior Director will require supporting documentation of metrics being evaluated in conjunction with the report itself to further ensure accuracy.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Finding 2022-001 (Significant Deficiency) AL# 93.558:Temporary Assistance for Needy Families, Passed Thru the Kansas Department for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Award # EES-2021- MHASCKS-01 Condition: The final performance report for the grant year requires the submission of additional performance metrics. The reported metrics included correct underlying data; however, two of the nine required metrics included calculation errors for the grant year ended June 30, 2022. Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303(a) states the Association is required to establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. Questioned Costs: None Context: Only the final performance report was required to have these metrics and the calculations were inaccurate. The sample size was determined based upon guidelines provided by the AICPA which is not a statistically valid sample. Cause: Secondary review of performance calculations were not performed. Effect: Not providing accurate performance metrics may lead to inaccurate conclusions on the program?s effectiveness. Recommendation: We recommend the Association add a secondary review of all reports. Views of Responsible Officials (Unaudited): The agency has put into place a secondary review in which the report is prepared by the Program Coordinator, in conjunction with the Administrative Assistant, and then reviewed for accuracy by the Senior Director of Grants and Aging. Additionally, the Senior Director will require supporting documentation of metrics being evaluated in conjunction with the report itself to further ensure accuracy.
Finding 2022-001 (Significant Deficiency) Condition: The final performance report for the grant year requires the submission of additional performance metrics. The reported metrics included correct underlying data; however, two of the nine required metrics included calculation errors for the grant year ended June 30, 2022. Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303(a) states the Association is required to establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. Cause: Secondary review of performance calculations were not performed. Effect: Not providing accurate performance metrics may lead to inaccurate conclusions on the program's effectiveness. Corrective Plan: The agency has put into place a secondary review in which the report is prepared by the Program Coordinator, in conjunction with the Administrative Assistant, and then reviewed for accuracy by the Senior Director of Grants and Aging. Additionally, the Senior Director will require supporting documentation of metrics being evaluated in conjunction with the report itself to further ensure accuracy.
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.
Start monitoring →© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.
