CHEYENNE COUNTY, NEBRASKA

EIN: 476006443

UEI: JA2LPMD7CWE8

Data as of August 21, 2026

CHEYENNE COUNTY, NEBRASKA2 audit years1 findings
2
Audit Years
1
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings

FY 2024-06-30

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on April 24, 2025. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by October 24, 2025 (302 days ago).

What is a management decision? →
2024-001
Other
MATERIAL WEAKNESS

Criteria An adequate internal control system design should be designed to adequately segregate responsibilities of performing control functions sufficient to prevent circumvention of those controls by any one individual. Condition and Context The County has not employed an internal control system that sufficiently segregates accounting functions to a degree that reasonably reduces the risk that fraud could occur and not be detected. Cause of the Condition It appears that the County currently employs an insufficient number of financial personnel required to sufficiently segregate accounting functions. Effect of the Condition Internal controls may be circumvented to reduce the ability of those internal controls to detect fraud. Recommendation Although this condition is a serious defect in the design of the internal control system, we believe the financial and personnel resources necessary to adequately segregate accounting functions would outweigh the assurance provided. However, we also recommend that management and the Board of Commissioners be continuously aware of this condition, segregate high-risk functions when possible, implement alternative mitigating procedures, and rigorously investigate unusual transactions when discovered. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action We understand that an internal control system is inadequate without sufficient segregation of accounting functions. However, we believe that the required resources necessary to properly segregate accounting functions are beyond reasonable expectations, given the size and current resources of the County. We are aware of the risks of fraud associated with insufficient segregation of accounting functions and the County implements mitigating controls, when possible, and investigates unusual circumstances and transactions when encountered.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Criteria An adequate internal control system design should be designed to adequately segregate responsibilities of performing control functions sufficient to prevent circumvention of those controls by any one individual. Condition and Context The County has not employed an internal control system that sufficiently segregates accounting functions to a degree that reasonably reduces the risk that fraud could occur and not be detected. Cause of the Condition It appears that the County currently employs an insufficient number of financial personnel required to sufficiently segregate accounting functions. Effect of the Condition Internal controls may be circumvented to reduce the ability of those internal controls to detect fraud. Recommendation Although this condition is a serious defect in the design of the internal control system, we believe the financial and personnel resources necessary to adequately segregate accounting functions would outweigh the assurance provided. However, we also recommend that management and the Board of Commissioners be continuously aware of this condition, segregate high-risk functions when possible, implement alternative mitigating procedures, and rigorously investigate unusual transactions when discovered. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action We understand that an internal control system is inadequate without sufficient segregation of accounting functions. However, we believe that the required resources necessary to properly segregate accounting functions are beyond reasonable expectations, given the size and current resources of the County. We are aware of the risks of fraud associated with insufficient segregation of accounting functions and the County implements mitigating controls, when possible, and investigates unusual circumstances and transactions when encountered.

Corrective Action Plan

The County has assessed the benefits and costs associated with proper segregation of duties and has determined that costs would outweigh the benefits received. The County understands the inherent risks associated with improper segregation of accounting functions. Management has communicated the need for transactions to be well supported by documentation as well as seeking appropriate authorization when appropriate. The County requires reporting to the Board of Commissioner for all disbursements to ensure transactions are proper and potential errors and irregularities are identified on a timely basis. The County will continue to review accounting procedures and processes to further mitigate this internal control deficiency whenever possible and feasible.

About Other →

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and compliance status.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.