INSTITUTE FOR LEARNING INNOVATIONNon-Profit

EIN: 464453337

UEI: HYX9HNCUQC35

Audited by: YSR CPA GROUP, P.C.

Oversight agency: 47 [National Science Foundation]

Data as of August 27, 2026

INSTITUTE FOR LEARNING INNOVATION5 audit years6 findings1 repeat
5
Audit Years
6
Total Findings
1
Repeat Findings

FY 2019-12-31

MATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$1,020,346 federal awards expended

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on December 27, 2020. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by June 27, 2021 (1888 days ago).

What is a management decision? →
2019-004
Subrecipient Monitoring
MATERIAL WEAKNESSMODIFIED OPINION

The Institute?s policies and procedures inadequately address the Institutes responsibilities as it relates to subrecipient monitoring and management. This includes the Institutes responsibilities when a subaward is made and when agreements are created. Also, this includes the Institute?s responsibility to monitor subrecipients during the term of the subaward agreement. Criteria: 2 CFR sections 200.331 and 200.332 of the Uniform Guidance (UG) outlines the Institute?s responsibilities as it relates to subrecipient monitoring and management. Cause: The Institute is a small, virtual organization with few employees. As a result, during the period under audit, adequate policies and procedures relating to subrecipient monitoring and management had not been prepared. Effect: Failure to establish adequate policies and procedures increases the risk of noncompliance with federal requirements. Questioned Costs: None Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the Institute implement policies and procedures for subrecipient monitoring and management that comply with 2 CFR sections 200.331 and 200.332 of the UG. Views of Responsible Officials This deficiency was brought to our attention in early 2020 via the and Planned Corrective Actions: NSF desk audit as well. We revised our subrecipient monitoring and management policies shortly thereafter to bring them into compliance with 2 CFR sections 200.331 and 200.332 of the UG. As of July 2020, all subawardees? invoices are reviewed in compliance with these sections; supporting documents are also reviewed. A subaward monitoring checklist is maintained by the Finance Administrator for each subawardee. These revisions to policy were reviewed by an independent national accounting firm, MFA, LLP, and based on their recommendation to adopt these changes as policy, approved by the Finance Committee of the Institute?s Board in December 2020.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding 2019-004 Research and Development Cluster Material Weakness National Science Foundation Condition: The Institute?s policies and procedures inadequately address the Institutes responsibilities as it relates to subrecipient monitoring and management. This includes the Institutes responsibilities when a subaward is made and when agreements are created. Also, this includes the Institute?s responsibility to monitor subrecipients during the term of the subaward agreement. Criteria: 2 CFR sections 200.331 and 200.332 of the Uniform Guidance (UG) outlines the Institute?s responsibilities as it relates to subrecipient monitoring and management. Cause: The Institute is a small, virtual organization with few employees. As a result, during the period under audit, adequate policies and procedures relating to subrecipient monitoring and management had not been prepared. Effect: Failure to establish adequate policies and procedures increases the risk of noncompliance with federal requirements. Questioned Costs: None Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the Institute implement policies and procedures for subrecipient monitoring and management that comply with 2 CFR sections 200.331 and 200.332 of the UG. Views of Responsible Officials This deficiency was brought to our attention in early 2020 via the and Planned Corrective Actions: NSF desk audit as well. We revised our subrecipient monitoring and management policies shortly thereafter to bring them into compliance with 2 CFR sections 200.331 and 200.332 of the UG. As of July 2020, all subawardees? invoices are reviewed in compliance with these sections; supporting documents are also reviewed. A subaward monitoring checklist is maintained by the Finance Administrator for each subawardee. These revisions to policy were reviewed by an independent national accounting firm, MFA, LLP, and based on their recommendation to adopt these changes as policy, approved by the Finance Committee of the Institute?s Board in December 2020.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding 2019-004 ? Research and Development Cluster, National Science Foundation Recommendation: We recommend the Institute implement policies and procedures for subrecipient monitoring and management that comply with 2 CFR sections 200.331 and 200.332 of the UG. Action Taken: This deficiency was brought to our attention in early 2020 via the NSF desk audit as well. We revised our subrecipient monitoring and management policies shortly thereafter to bring them into compliance with 2 CFR sections 200.331 and 200.332 of the UG. As of July 2020, all subawardees? invoices are reviewed in compliance with these sections; supporting documents are also reviewed. A subaward monitoring checklist is maintained by the Finance Administrator for each subawardee. These revisions to policy were reviewed by an independent national accounting and auditing firm, MFA, LLP, and based on their recommendation to adopt these changes as policy, approved by the Finance Committee of the ILI Board in December 2020.

About Subrecipient Monitoring →
2019-005
Subrecipient Monitoring
MATERIAL WEAKNESSMODIFIED OPINIONQUESTIONED COSTS

We noted the Institute did not adequately monitor its subrecipients. During the audit period, the Institute discovered it was overbilled by a subrecipient by approximately $60,000. Inadequate monitoring activities was the primary reason this occurred. Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.332 of the UG outlines required monitoring activities. Such activities may include review of the subrecipient?s financial statements and Single Audit reports, review and approval of invoices and supporting documentation, and verification that subrecipients were audited in conformance with 2 CFR 200 Subpart F ? Audit Requirements. Cause: As noted in Finding 2019-004, the Institute?s policies and procedures did not adequately address the Institutes responsibilities as it relates to subrecipient monitoring and management, which includes its monitoring activities. As a result, the Institute did not adequately monitor its subrecipients. Effect: Failure to establish adequate subrecipient monitoring activities could lead to ineffective stewardship of funds. Questioned Costs: The amount of questioned costs was approximately $60,000. However, at December 31, 2019, the Institute recorded a liability in its financial statements equaling the amount payable to the NSF, which was returned to the NSF in September 2020. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the Institute implement subrecipient monitoring activities as outlined in 2 CFR section 200.332 of the UG and obtain written documentation of monitoring activities performed in compliance with federal requirements. Views of Responsible Officials This deficiency was brought to our attention in early 2020 via the NSF and Planned Corrective Actions: desk audit. We revised our subrecipient monitoring and management and management policies shortly thereafter to bring them into compliance with 2 CFR section 200.332 of the UG. In consultation with MFA, LLP, subrecipient monitoring and management policies and procedures were revised and implemented beginning in July 2020. This work is now complete, and these new subrecipient monitoring and management policies were approved by the Finance Committee of the Institute Board in December 2020. Conformance with both 2 CFC section 200.331 and 200.332 of the UG is now an integral part of the Institute?s accounting process and procedures.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding 2019-005 Research and Development Cluster Material Weakness National Science Foundation Condition: We noted the Institute did not adequately monitor its subrecipients. During the audit period, the Institute discovered it was overbilled by a subrecipient by approximately $60,000. Inadequate monitoring activities was the primary reason this occurred. Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.332 of the UG outlines required monitoring activities. Such activities may include review of the subrecipient?s financial statements and Single Audit reports, review and approval of invoices and supporting documentation, and verification that subrecipients were audited in conformance with 2 CFR 200 Subpart F ? Audit Requirements. Cause: As noted in Finding 2019-004, the Institute?s policies and procedures did not adequately address the Institutes responsibilities as it relates to subrecipient monitoring and management, which includes its monitoring activities. As a result, the Institute did not adequately monitor its subrecipients. Effect: Failure to establish adequate subrecipient monitoring activities could lead to ineffective stewardship of funds. Questioned Costs: The amount of questioned costs was approximately $60,000. However, at December 31, 2019, the Institute recorded a liability in its financial statements equaling the amount payable to the NSF, which was returned to the NSF in September 2020. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the Institute implement subrecipient monitoring activities as outlined in 2 CFR section 200.332 of the UG and obtain written documentation of monitoring activities performed in compliance with federal requirements. Views of Responsible Officials This deficiency was brought to our attention in early 2020 via the NSF and Planned Corrective Actions: desk audit. We revised our subrecipient monitoring and management and management policies shortly thereafter to bring them into compliance with 2 CFR section 200.332 of the UG. In consultation with MFA, LLP, subrecipient monitoring and management policies and procedures were revised and implemented beginning in July 2020. This work is now complete, and these new subrecipient monitoring and management policies were approved by the Finance Committee of the Institute Board in December 2020. Conformance with both 2 CFC section 200.331 and 200.332 of the UG is now an integral part of the Institute?s accounting process and procedures.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding 2019-005 ? Research and Development Cluster, National Science Foundation Recommendation: We recommend the Institute implement subrecipient monitoring activities as outlined in 2 CFR section 200.332 of the UG and obtain written documentation of monitoring activities performed in compliance with federal requirements. Action Taken: This deficiency was brought to our attention in early 2020 via the NSF desk audit. We revised our subrecipient monitoring and management policies shortly thereafter to bring them into compliance with 2 CFR section 200.332 of the UG. In consultation MFA, LLP, subrecipient monitoring and management policies and procedures were revised and implemented beginning in July 2020. This work is now complete, and these new subrecipient monitoring and management policies were approved by the Finance Committee of the ILI Board in December 2020. Conformance with both 2 CFR sections 200.331 and 200.332 of the UG is now an integral part of ILI?s accounting process and procedures.

About Subrecipient Monitoring →

FY 2018-12-31

MATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$969,769 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on September 29, 2019 — management decision was due March 29, 2020.

2018-002
Other
MATERIAL WEAKNESSMODIFIED OPINIONREPEAT

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2017-002

About Other →

FY 2017-12-31

MATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$928,543 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on September 27, 2018 — management decision was due March 27, 2019.

2017-002
Other
MATERIAL WEAKNESSMODIFIED OPINION

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Other →
2017-003
Cost Allowability
MATERIAL WEAKNESSMODIFIED OPINIONQUESTIONED COSTS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →
2017-004
Subrecipient Monitoring
MATERIAL WEAKNESSMODIFIED OPINION

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Subrecipient Monitoring →

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.