Office of the State Auditor

EIN: 450309764

UEI: GFSVLLB2TN43

Data as of August 19, 2026

8
Audit Years
208
Total Findings
60
Repeat Findings

FY 2024-06-30

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on March 20, 2025. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by September 20, 2025, which was (334 days ago).

What is a management decision? →
2024-001
Reporting
MATERIAL WEAKNESS
Condition

CONDITION The Division of Emergency Services did not correctly and timely report subawards on Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) reports. The FFATA reporting was made for payments over $30,000 at the end of every month rather than amounts obligated in that month. The Division of Emergency Services corrected their procedures in March 2024 to report new subawards based on obligation amount. Expanded testing from USASpending.gov was performed to ensure that new subawards reported obligated subaward amounts. This test found that, while still untimely, all subawards with action dates from March 2024-June 2024 were properly reported with the obligated subaward amounts. The auditors tested 37 subaward obligations. 26 obligations were selected based on payments made during the audit period. Due to the agency correcting their procedures, an additional 11 obligations were selected from USASpending.gov with subaward action dates after March 1, 2024. One of the 37 subawards, obligated for $15,888,022 in federal funds, was not reported at all for FFATA. Five of 37 tested subawards were reported for the payment amount rather than the obligation amount of the subaward. The errors in obligation amount for these five subawards netted to $1,490,193.12. 26 out of 37 tested subawards were not reported by the end of the month following the month of the obligation date. For context, 17 of the 26 errors were reported within 2 weeks after end of the month following the month of obligation. Other key data elements were correct for reported obligations. CRITERIA Federal regulation 2 CFR 170, Appendix A requires a Federal Financial Assistance Transparency Act (FFATA) report for each subaward that equals or exceeds $30,000 no later than the end of the month following the month in which the obligation was made. The subaward information is then available to the public on the USA Spending website for transparency. 2 CFR 200.303(a) states that non-Federal entities must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. CAUSE The FFATA reporting was made for payments over $30,000 at the end of every month rather than amounts obligated in that month. EFFECT Not meeting the FFATA requirements increases the likelihood that the public will not have access to transparent and accurate information regarding expenditures of federal awards. CONTEXT During the audit period, the agency made payments on 308 subawards and 11 disasters. Where sampling was performed, the audit used a non-statistical sampling method. IDENTIFICATION AS A REPEAT FINDING Not a repeat finding. RECOMMENDATION We recommend the Division of Emergency Services ensures timely and accurate submission of FFATA reports in accordance with federal regulations. ADJUTANT GENERAL RESPONSE The Adjutant General agrees with the finding. See “Management’s Response and Corrective Action” section of this report.

Corrective Action Plan

Adjutant General Response/Corrective Action Plan: The agency agrees with the finding. In March 2024, the agency self-identified the reporting change and adjusted internal procedures to report new subawards based on obligation amount vs reporting on payments over $30,000 at the end of every month. Any obligations that have been identified as missed in the transition have since been reported, and the new method of reporting on obligations will be followed moving forward. The agency will ensure per Federal regulation 2 CFR 170, Appendix A that each subaward that equals or exceeds $30,000 no later than the end of the month following the month in which the obligation was made will be reported. Contact Person: Jennifer Scheet, Division Chief – Fiscal & Admin Services, 701-333-2079, jenniferscheet@nd.gov Anticipated Completion Date: The audit period covered July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2024 and the agency corrected the reporting in March 2024 after self-identifying the reporting criteria.

About Reporting →
2024-002
Reporting
MATERIAL WEAKNESS
Condition

CONDITION Quarterly Project and Expenditure Reports tested did not accurately report key line items for each project. CRITERIA Coronavirus Capital Projects Fund Compliance and Reporting Guidance For States, Territories, and Freely Associated States (published December 2022) indicates that expenditures may be reported on a cash or accrual basis as long as the methodology is disclosed and is consistently applied. Project and Expenditure Reports must incorporate the definition of expenditures pursuant to 2 CFR 200.1. Recipients must maintain accounting records for compiling and reporting accurate financial data in accordance with appropriate accounting standards and principles. The guidance also defines "Obligations" as orders placed for property and services, contracts and subawards made, and similar transactions that require payment. In addition, for Multipurpose Community Facility Projects, recipients are required to report, for each project, current period obligations, cumulative obligations, current period expenditures, and cumulative expenditures; as well as total square footage funded by CPF dollars (planned/actual). Lastly, the guidance allows edits or changes to be reflected in the next available report. Federal regulation, 2 CFR 200.303, requires non-Federal entities, in part, to establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Per GAO Standards for Internal Control in Federal Government, Information and Communication, Principle 13 - Use of Quality Information, Attribute 13.04, management should obtain relevant data from reliable internal and external sources in a timely manner based on the identified information requirements. CAUSE Career and Technical Education did not consistently utilize accounting records for compiling Project and Expenditure Report data in accordance with appropriate accounting standards and principles. The tracking spreadsheet used to prepare the reports lacked a consistent basis of accounting for tracking payments since certain dates reflected in the spreadsheet did not agree to the state's accounting system (PeopleSoft) posted dates. Lastly, Career and Technical Education was unaware of the definition of an "obligation" until it was brought up during the Single Audit. EFFECT Inaccurate Project and Expenditure Reports limit the Treasury's ability to effectively track and monitor the use of the Coronavirus Capital Projects Fund for approved projects. In addition, inaccurate Project and Expenditures Reports also impacts the accuracy of program reporting for public transparency purposes. CONTEXT The Career and Technical Education entered into grant agreements with subrecipients on March 17, 2022, that obligated the initial CPF appropriation of $68,276,228 for multipurpose community facility projects. These grant agreements were subsequently amended in March 2024 to allocate $6,319,473 of CPF initially appropriated for broadband projects. We tested the Project and Expenditure Reports which covered the periods January 1, 2024, to March 31, 2024, and April 1, 2024, to June 30, 2024. For the covered period January 1, 2024, to March 31, 2024, current period obligations were overstated by $9,272,777, cumulative obligations were understated by $36,987,052, current period expenditures were incorrectly reported for 5 out of 19 projects (in total, current period expenditures were understated by $124,881 using the cash basis) and cumulative expenditures were incorrectly reported for 7 out of 19 projects (in total, cumulative expenditures were overstated by $143,376 using the cash basis). For the covered period April 1, 2024, to June 30, 2024, current period obligations were overstated by $10,308,528, cumulative obligation amounts were corrected based on discussions with the auditor, current period expenditures were incorrectly reported for 8 out of 19 projects (in total, current period expenditures were overstated by $1,639,438 using the cash basis), and cumulative expenditures were incorrectly reported for 9 out of 19 projects (in total, cumulative expenditures were overstated by $2,223,450 using the cash basis or understated by $737,558 using the accrual basis). Lastly, it appeared total square footage reported (planned and actual) included square footage funded by all funding sources and not the square footage funded solely by CPF. Where sampling was performed, the audit used a non-statistical sampling method. IDENTIFICATION AS A REPEAT FINDING Not a repeat finding. RECOMMENDATION We recommend the Career and Technical Education establish a consistent methodology for compiling and reporting financial data that is in accordance with appropriate accounting standards and principles. We also recommend the Career and Technical Education comply with Project and Expenditure Report guidance for reporting obligations, expenditures, and total square footage funded by Capital Project Fund dollars, including making any necessary edits and changes in the next available report. CAREER AND TECHNICAL EDUCATION RESPONSE The Department agrees with this recommendation See “Management’s Response and Corrective Action” section of this report.

Corrective Action Plan

Career and Technical Education Response/Corrective Action Plan: The department agrees with this recommendation The department has established a methodology for compiling and reporting financial data that is in accordance with appropriate accounting standards and principles and has corrected reporting obligations, and expenditures. The department has also worked directly with the Treasury Department to make sure the square footage being claimed is consistent with what they are looking for. Contact Person: Wayde Sick, Director and Executive Officer and Gwen Ferderer, Finance Director Anticipated Completion Date: August 2024

About Reporting →
2024-003
Subrecipient Monitoring
MATERIAL WEAKNESS
Condition

CONDITION Career and Technical Education is not verifying every subrecipient is audited and reviewing audit findings as required by 2 CFR 200, Subpart F. Subsequently, by not verifying every subrecipient is audited, Career and Technical Education is not ensuring their responsibilities for issuing management decisions are performed, if any findings are identified in the audits. CRITERIA All pass-through entities must: • Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and terms and conditions of the subaward, and that the subaward performance goals are achieved. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include, in part, following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity detected through audits, on-site reviews, and written confirmation from the subrecipient, highlighting the status of actions planned or taken to address Single Audit findings related to the particular subaward; issuing a management decision for applicable audit findings pertaining only to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity as required by 2 CFR 200.521; and ensuring audit findings specifically related to the subaward are resolved (2 CFR 200.332(d)). • Verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by 2 CFR 200, Subpart F, when it is expected that the subrecipient's Federal award expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the $750,000 threshold set forth in 2 CFR 200.501 (2 CFR 200.332(f). Federal regulation, 2 CFR 200.303, requires non-Federal entities, in part, to establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. CAUSE Career and Technical Education has not established processes to identify which subrecipients are subject to required audits or to obtain and review Uniform Guidance Single Audit reports. In addition, Career and Technical Education has not developed a tracking system to ensure timely submission of required audit reports and to ensure timely and appropriate corrective action is taken on all deficiencies. EFFECT Subrecipient noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward, including audit findings pertaining to the Federal award, may go undetected and unresolved. CONTEXT Career and Technical Education awarded subawards, individually up to $10 million, to 13 subrecipients totaling $74.6 million for 19 different multi-purpose community facility projects. Career and Technical Education has had prior experience with these subrecipients. Projects were included in the state’s program plan that was reviewed and approved by U.S. Treasury. Career and Technical Education imposed specific subaward conditions upon each subrecipient requiring payments as reimbursements rather than advance payments. Career and Technical Education performs ongoing monitoring procedures through review and approval of subrecipient requests for reimbursements, which includes reviewing invoices and contractor progress billings for unallowable expenses, prior to disbursing Capital Project Funds. Lastly, Career and Technical Education conducts annual on-site visits of started projects until completed to visually inspect projects are being completed as planned. Where sampling was performed, the audit used a non-statistical sampling method. This finding, in combination with the finding regarding required communication of award information to the subrecipients (Finding 2024-04), results in a modified opinion for the subrecipient monitoring compliance requirement. IDENTIFICATION AS A REPEAT FINDING Not a repeat finding. RECOMMENDATION We recommend Career and Technical Education establish processes to identify which subrecipients are subject to required audits and to obtain and review Uniform Guidance Single Audit reports, including developing a tracking system to ensure timely submission of required audit reports and timely and appropriate corrective action is taken on all deficiencies. We also recommend Career and Technical Education verify every subrecipient is audited as required by 2 CFR 200, Subpart F; follow-up and ensure that subrecipients take timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies of the Federal award; and issue management decisions and ensure audit findings have been resolved. CAREER AND TECHNICAL EDUCATION RESPONSE The Department agrees with this recommendation See “Management’s Response and Corrective Action” section of this report.

Corrective Action Plan

Career and Technical Education Response/Corrective Action Plan: The department agrees with this recommendation The department has developed a system to identify which subrecipients are subject to required audits and are tracking subrecipients to ensure timely submission of required audit reports and appropriate corrective actions. Contact Person: Wayde Sick, Director and Executive Officer and Gwen Ferderer, Finance Director Anticipated Completion Date: August 2024

About Subrecipient Monitoring →
2024-004
Subrecipient Monitoring
MATERIAL WEAKNESS
Condition

CONDITION The Career and Technical Education did not ensure all required information was provided to subrecipients provided Coronavirus Capital Project Funds CPF). In addition, the pass-through entity's internal controls were insufficient to ensure that subrecipients received communication regarding the necessary items. Required information not communicated included: • Subrecipient's name did not always match the name associated with its unique entity identifier obtained from SAM.gov; • Subrecipient's unique entity identifier; • Federal Award Identification Number; • Federal Award date; • Subaward Period of Performance Start and End Date; • Amounts of the Federal Funds obligated, committed, and in total to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity were not clearly identifiable between Coronavirus Capital Projects Fund and Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds; • Assistance Listing Number; and, • Reference of requirement for auditor access to the subrecipient's records and financial statements. CRITERIA Federal regulation, 2 CFR 200.332(a), requires pass-through entities to communicate specific required information to subrecipients. Federal regulation, 2 CFR 200.303, requires non-Federal entities, in part, to establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. CAUSE Career and Technical Education worked with the Attorney General's Office to develop a standard template for agreements with subrecipients. However, Career and Technical Education did not ensure all required communications applicable to Federal awards were included in the standard template. EFFECT These required communications are required to help subrecipients meet all their reporting requirements, and to meet all award terms. Subrecipients subject to Single Audits also need this information for their audits. CONTEXT Career and Technical Education awarded Capital Project Fund subawards, individually up to $10 million, to 13 subrecipients totaling $74.6 million for 19 different multi-purpose community facility projects. Four subaward agreements were tested and all did not include the required information identified in the condition of this finding. In addition, three subrecipients received $6,666,667 for the projects from the State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund. Career and Technical Education only entered into one grant agreement, which commingled Capital Project Funds and State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds, with three of the 13 subrecipients. One of the three subrecipients that received both Capital Project Funds and State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds had its fiscal year 2023 Single Audit on the Federal Audit Clearinghouse. This subrecipient incorrectly reported all $10 million as Capital Project Funds (ALN 21.029) on its Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards when only $3,333,333 should have been reported under ALN 21.029. Where sampling was performed, the audit used a non-statistical sampling method. This finding, in combination with the finding regarding required audits (Finding 2024-03), results in a modified opinion for the subrecipient monitoring compliance requirement. IDENTIFICATION AS A REPEAT FINDING Not a repeat finding. RECOMMENDATION We recommend Career and Technical Education: • Communicate all required information of 2 CFR 200.332(b) to subrecipients; • Develop procedures to ensure grant agreement templates are updated and that all Coronavirus Capital Projects Fund award information is communicated to subrecipients; and, • Reissue grant agreements to outline the required information. CAREER AND TECHNICAL EDUCATION RESPONSE The Department agrees with this recommendation See “Management’s Response and Corrective Action” section of this report.

Corrective Action Plan

Career and Technical Education Response/Corrective Action Plan: The department agrees with this recommendation The department has: A. Communicated all required information of 2 CFR 200.332(b) to subrecipients B. Developed procedures to ensure grant agreement templates are updated and that all Coronavirus Capital Projects Fund award information is communicated to subrecipients C. Reissued grant agreements to outline the required information. Contact Person: Wayde Sick, Director and Executive Officer and Gwen Ferderer, Finance Director Anticipated Completion Date: September 2024

About Subrecipient Monitoring →
2024-005
Period of Performance
REPEATQUESTIONED COSTS
Condition

CONDITION The Department of Human Services made payments under the Vocational Rehabilitation program outside of the 2021 and 2022 grant award periods of performance which was 10/1/20 - 9/30/21, and 10/1/21-9/30/22 with an allowable liquidation period, to pay for obligations, through 12/31/2022 and 12/31/2023, respectively. Payments made after the liquidation period totaled $1,495.35 for the 2021 grant. Payments obligated after the obligation period totaled $23,340 for the 2021 grant and $7,156 for the 2022 grant. CRITERIA The following criteria requires federal funds to be obligated by the end of the two-year period of performance window and those obligations must be liquidated within 90 days after the end date of period of performance. 2 CFR 200.343 requires: " Unless the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity authorizes an extension, a non-Federal entity must liquidate all obligations incurred under the Federal award not later than 90 calendar days after the end date of the period of performance as specified in the terms and conditions of the Federal award. 34 CFR 361.64 requires: " (a) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, any Federal funds, including reallotted funds, that are appropriated for a fiscal year to carry out a program under this part that are not obligated by the State by the beginning of the succeeding fiscal year and any program income received during a fiscal year that is not obligated by the State by the beginning of the succeeding fiscal year remain available for obligation by the State during that succeeding fiscal year. (b) Federal funds appropriated for a fiscal year remain available for obligation in the succeeding fiscal year only to the extent that the State met the matching requirement for those Federal funds by obligating, in accordance with 34 CFR 76.707, the non-Federal share in the fiscal year for which the funds were appropriated." The following criteria pertains to the establishment and maintenance of effective internal control to ensure payments are made within the correct period of performance. 45 CFR 75.303 states the non-Federal entity must, "establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award." CAUSE The Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), Vocational Rehabilitation Program, allowed payments to universities for tuition to be charged during the federal grant prior to the period when the service was provided. This issue was noted in three of five errors found in sampling and affected both the FFY 2021 and FFY 2022 grants. The remaining two errors were a result of expenditures being assigned improper coding which was not identified during the regular period of performance reviews performed by DHHS. The first occurred prior to the implementation of the period of performance reviews and the second was an expenditure to another state agency that was evaluated by the agency's review using the date of the check rather than the dates on the invoice. EFFECT Known unallowable costs totaling $30,496. were charged to the grants due to being obligated or liquidated after the period of performance. When projected to the population, an additional $50,372 in errors are likely. CONTEXT The Department of Health and Human Services had 395 payments totaling $514,546 after the period of performance for the FFY2021 and FY2022 federal grants. Of this amount, $26,367 were tuition fee payments determined to be the total population of known questioned costs related to tuition fees. $36,969 of the remaining population were sampled and $4,128 were errors. These errors projected to $54,401. Where sampling was performed, the audit used a non-statistical sampling method. IDENTIFICATION AS A REPEAT FINDING Finding 2022-021 was reported in the immediate prior year. Findings 2020-019, 2018-031, and 2016-053 were reported in previous years. The prior audit finding was reported as implemented on the summary schedule of prior audit findings. This materially misrepresents the status of the finding. RECOMMENDATION We recommend the Department of Health and Human Services improve procedures to review transactions for period of performance corrections to prevent and detect payments from being charged to the Vocational Rehabilitation program outside the period of performance. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES RESPONSE The Department of Health and Human Services agrees with the recommendation. See “Management’s Response and Corrective Action” section of this report.

Corrective Action Plan

Department of Health and Human Services Response/Corrective Action Plan The Department of Health and Human Services agrees with the recommendation. To address this, the department will run quarterly reports from AWARE to identify any payments charged to the incorrect period of performance. Grant guidance has been updated to ensure items with unique service dates are properly reviewed. Additionally, during the three-month liquidation period, a monthly review of all expenditures will be conducted to verify they are applied to the correct period of performance. These actions will strengthen oversight and ensure compliance with grant requirements. Contact Person: Eric Haas, Assistant CFO Anticipated Completion Date: December 2024

Prior Finding References

2022-021

About Period of Performance →
2024-006
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability
QUESTIONED COSTS
Condition

CONDITION The Department of Health and Human Services made payments under the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families program and recorded the payments to an incorrect grant year. The expenditures were incurred prior to the start of the period of performance of the grants. Of the errors found $40,420 was incorrectly charged to federal fiscal year 2023 grant and $37,702 was incorrectly charged to the federal fiscal year 2024 grant without obtaining federal approval. CRITERIA 45 CFR 75.309 states that a non-Federal entity may charge to the Federal award only allowable costs incurred during the period of performance and any costs incurred before the HHS awarding agency or pass-through entity made the Federal award that were authorized by the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity. 45 CFR 75.303 states that the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. CAUSE The Department of Health and Human Services, Temporary Assistance for Needy Families, incorrectly interpreted the period of performance requirements and the start date for each grant award. EFFECT Costs totaling $78,113 were charged to the incorrect grant award. CONTEXT The Department of Health and Human Services, Temporary Assistance for Needy Families program, had non-benefit expenditures of $3,887,368 through 235 vouchers. 2 of the 24 vouchers that were sampled were found to be paid from an incorrect grant year which resulted in known questioned costs of $78,113 and, when projected to the population, additional likely questioned costs of $182,730. Where sampling was performed, the audit used a non-statistical sampling method. IDENTIFICATION AS A REPEAT FINDING Not a repeat finding. RECOMMENDATION We recommend the Department of Health and Human Services follow period of performance time frames when paying expenditures under grant awards and, if paying expenditures prior to the start of the grant award, federal approval is obtained. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES RESPONSE The Department of Health and Human Services agrees with the recommendation. See “Management’s Response and Corrective Action” section of this report.

Corrective Action Plan

Department of Health and Human Services Response/Corrective Action Plan The Department of Health and Human Services agrees with the recommendation. The department will monitor expenses within the budget and grant period based on guidance from the federal agency to ensure that the date of expenditures are not claimed before grant funds are received. Contact Person: Eric Haas, Assistant CFO Anticipated Completion Date: December 2024

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →
2024-007
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability
REPEATQUESTIONED COSTS
Condition

CONDITION Providers did not submit proper documentation or incorrectly billed the number of units provided to individuals. The audit requested supporting documentation for tested claims from the providers and found errors in 12 of the total 570 claims tested by the auditors. The error in 1 claim did not have a financial impact. The remaining errors resulted in improper payments totaling $16,150.19. When projected to the entire population, the additional likely federal questioned costs totaled $22,320,252. The errors by program are as follows: There were 9 errors found in 480 Medicaid claims tested with known improper payments of $15,001.29 which resulted in additional likely federal questioned costs of $22,213,214 when projected to the entire population. There were 2 errors found in 90 CHIP claims tested with known improper payments of $1,148.90 which resulted in $107,038 additional likely federal questioned costs when projected to the entire population. CRITERIA 45 CFR 75.303 states that the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. 42 CFR 431.960 (c) (1) states a medical review error is an error resulting in an overpayment or underpayment that is determined from a review of the provider's medical record or other documentation supporting the service(s) claimed, Code of Federal Regulations that are applicable to conditions of payment, the State's written policies, and a comparison between the documentation and written policies and the information presented on the claim resulting in Federal and/or State improper payments. 42 CFR 431.960 (c) (3) states medical review errors include, but are not limited to, the following: (i) lack of documentation, (ii) insufficient documentation, and (iii) procedure coding errors. CAUSE DHHS was not able to obtain the required documentation after multiple requests or providers submitted documentation that didn't support their billed units. EFFECT Unallowable or inaccurate payments were made to providers who did not submit proper documentation, or who submitted claims that did not match the number of service units provided as evidenced by their documentation when selected for audit. CONTEXT There were 12,228,253 Medicaid claims and 374,561 CHIP claims that occurred during our audit period of July 1, 2022, through June 30, 2024. The federal portion of the projected likely questioned costs was calculated by using the average federal matching rate for claims paid during our audit period. Where sampling was performed, the audit used a non-statistical sampling method. IDENTIFICATION AS A REPEAT FINDING Finding 2022-008 was reported in the immediate prior year. The prior audit finding was reported as implemented on the summary schedule of prior audit findings. This materially misrepresents the status of the finding. RECOMMENDATION We recommend the Department of Human Services develop a corrective action plan to address the errors identified in the audit and recover payments made on unsupported claims. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES RESPONSE The Department of Health and Human Services agrees with the recommendation. See “Management’s Response and Corrective Action” section of this report.

Corrective Action Plan

Department of Health and Human Services Response/Corrective Action Plan The Department of Health and Human Services agrees with the recommendation. The department has controls in place to prevent errors. The target for this year’s Payment Error Rate Measurement (PERM) audit is 3.02%. Currently, our error rate stands at 2.1%, which is below the CMS PERM target. The department will continue to recover the payments made on unsupported claims. Contact Person: Sarah Aker, Medicaid Executive Director Krista Fremming, Assistant Director Anticipated Completion Date: 06/30/2025

Prior Finding References

2022-008

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →
2024-008
Special Tests & Provisions
Condition

CONDITION The Medicaid program integrity unit within DHHS is not independent from other Medicaid operations. The program integrity unit has system access that allows the unit to process and adjudicate Medicaid claims within the Medicaid Management Information System (MMIS). The audit compared claims by User IDs creating and last editing the claims to the employees by name within the program integrity unit. A review of access of MMIS identified 3 members of the program integrity unit with access within MMIS to process (submit, validate, edit, and override) claims during the audit period of July 1, 2022, through June 30, 2024. The audit did not identify any transactions where the 3 employees either created or last edited claims. CRITERIA The GAO Greenbook Principle 11.14 states "Management designs control activities to limit user access to information technology through authorization control activities such as providing a unique user identification or token to authorized users. These control activities may restrict authorized users to the applications or functions commensurate with their assigned responsibilities, supporting an appropriate segregation of duties." The GAO Greenbook Principle 10.03 states “Management divides or segregates key duties and responsibilities among different people to reduce the risk of error, misuse, or fraud. This includes separating the responsibilities for authorizing transactions, processing and recording them, reviewing the transactions, and handling any related assets so that no one individual controls all key aspects of a transaction or event.” Per DHHS' security plan for MMIS "The organization employs the concept of least privilege, allowing only authorized accesses for users (and processes acting on behalf of users) which are necessary to accomplish assigned tasks in accordance with missions and business functions." 45 CFR 75.303 states that the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. CAUSE Members of the program integrity unit are given access within MMIS that allows them to adjudicate and process claims. EFFECT There is a risk of self-review that the program integrity employee may review providers related to or actual claims that the same employee previously processed or adjudicated. CONTEXT 42 CFR 456.2 requires "The Medicaid agency must implement a statewide surveillance and utilization control program that safeguards against unnecessary or inappropriate use of Medicaid services and against excess payments." The program integrity unit is the team responsible for performing utilization reviews and other audits of claims and providers within the Medicaid program. During this period there were 12,228,253 claims and over $2 billion Medicaid expenditures reported on the 2023 and 2024 SEFAs. Where sampling was performed, the audit used a non-statistical sampling method. IDENTIFICATION AS A REPEAT FINDING Not a repeat finding. RECOMMENDATION We recommend that DHHS restrict access of the program integrity unit employees within MMIS from processing and adjudicating claims. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES RESPONSE The Department of Health and Human Services disagrees with the finding. The federal regulations do not explicitly mandate the separation of duties between employees conducting audits and those processing claims. While 42 CFR 456.2 requires Medicaid agencies to implement a surveillance and utilization control program, it does not specifically require the segregation of these roles. The regulation promotes control measures but does not mandate a distinct separation of duties. Based on this, we do not support this recommendation, as it exceeds the requirements outlined in the applicable federal rules. HHS remains committed to maintaining strong internal controls and believe our current structure aligns with regulatory expectations. See “Management’s Response and Corrective Action” section of this report. AUDITOR’S CONCLUDING COMMENTS While the audit did not identify noncompliance due to the lack of segregation of duties, this doesn’t remove the requirement of 45 CFR 75.303 to have proper internal controls and the guidance of the GAO Greenbook. This includes separating the responsibilities for authorizing, processing and recording, and reviewing the transactions.

Corrective Action Plan

Department of Health and Human Services Response/Corrective Action Plan The Department of Health and Human Services disagrees with the finding. The federal regulations do not explicitly mandate the separation of duties between employees conducting audits and those processing claims. While 42 CFR 456.2 requires Medicaid agencies to implement a surveillance and utilization control program, it does not specifically require the segregation of these roles. The regulation promotes control measures but does not mandate a distinct separation of duties. Based on this, we do not support this recommendation, as it exceeds the requirements outlined in the applicable federal rules. HHS remains committed to maintaining strong internal controls and believe our current structure aligns with regulatory expectations. Contact Person: Sarah Aker, Medicaid Executive Director Krista Fremming, Assistant Director Anticipated Completion Date: N/A

About Special Tests and Provisions →
2024-009
Eligibility
QUESTIONED COSTS
Condition

CONDITION The Department of Health and Human Services, Homeowner's Assistance Fund (HAF) program, made assistance payments in excess of the supported payment amounts. More specifically, 2 of the 60 eligibility payments reviewed resulted in actual overpayments of $14,993 and additional likely questioned costs of $317,445 when projected to the entire population. One of these errors was identified from a population of applications that had two separate reviewers during application and funding amount processing while the other error was derived from the population that had the same reviewer for the application and funding amount decision processing. CRITERIA • 2 CFR 200.303 states that the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. • 2 CFR 200.302(a) Each state must expend and account for the Federal award in accordance with state laws and procedures for expending and accounting for the state's own funds. In addition, the state's and the other non-Federal entity's financial management systems, including records documenting compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award, must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by general and program-specific terms and conditions; and the tracing of funds to a level of expenditures adequate to establish that such funds have been used according to the Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. • DHHS's HAF Policies & Procedures outlines its Tier 1 and Tier 2 reviews for its HAF application eligibility process. CAUSE The Department of Health and Human Services, Homeowner's Assistance Fund (HAF) program, did not have procedures in place to ensure assistance payments did not exceed the amounts on supporting documentation provided by the recipient. EFFECT The Department issued assistance payments for amounts greater than the underlying support for two unique households. CONTEXT During the audit period, the program paid over $32 million of Federal HAF assistance to citizens of North Dakota. Approximately $1.75 million of these payments did not go through the program's two tier eligibility review process. This translates to 1,323 out of the 34,432 payments during the audit period having the same reviewer for both tier 1 and tier 2 review. The State Auditor's Office performed eligibility testing of 60 applications with 20 of the 60 being from the applications that had the same reviewer for both tier 1 and tier 2 review and 40 being from applications with different reviewers for tier 1 and tier 2 review. From the 20 applications and associated payments with the same reviewer, one overpayment of $2,993.82 was identified which projected to $11,953.30. From the 40 applications with different reviewers, one overpayment of $12,000 was noted which projected to $320,485.56. In aggregate, these errors totaled $14,993.82 with an additional likely questioned cost of $317,445. Where sampling was performed, the audit used a non-statistical sampling method. IDENTIFICATION AS A REPEAT FINDING Not a repeat finding. RECOMMENDATION We recommend the Department of Health and Human Services implement procedures and ensure the funding decision and payment amounts are supported by the applicant provided documentation. Additionally, we recommend the Department ensure the improper payments are recouped through the HAF program's refunding process. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES RESPONSE The Department of Health and Human Services agrees with the recommendation. See “Management’s Response and Corrective Action” section of this report.

Corrective Action Plan

Department of Health and Human Services Response/Corrective Action Plan The Department of Health and Human Services agrees with the recommendation. During review of audit found two overpayment errors as a result of outdated supporting documents. Refunds have been requested. HHS provides ongoing training with eligibility and supervisory staff regarding document and eligibility requirements with staff. HHS actively monitors application quality and provides ongoing quality control reviews ensuring consistent adherence to best practices. Contact Person: Jessica Thomasson, Executive Policy Director Anticipated Completion Date: October 2024

About Eligibility →
2024-010
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability
QUESTIONED COSTS
Condition

CONDITION Due to a transposition error in DHHS's fiscal office a payment was approved that was incorrect and was not supported by proper documentation. This resulted in a known questioned cost of $29,000. When projected to the population, additional likely questioned costs of $160,247 were calculated. For the month of January 2024, a foster parent of three unaccompanied refugee minors should have received a payment for $3,255 based on foster care rates and how many days of January in placement. The payment amount was transposed, and payment was incorrectly made for $32,255 to the foster parent. Prior to this error, the foster parent received $3,000-$3,800 per month from the program. Following this error payments decreased due to one child leaving the program and the foster parent received $2,100 to $2,500 per month from the program. The foster parent stopped participating in the unaccompanied refugee minor program after the minors in their care were reunited with relatives, therefore leaving the program. CRITERIA 45 CFR 75.303 states that the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. 45 CFR 400.49 states the State agency or its designee agency(s) must maintain a procedure to ensure recovery of overpayments and correction of underpayments in the Refugee Cash Assistance (RCA) program. 45 CFR 400.112 states Foster care maintenance payments must be provided under a State's program under title IV-E of the Social Security Act if a child is eligible under that program. CAUSE Payment was entered incorrectly into the states accounting system and the error was not detected during the manual review process. Also, the unaccompanied refugee minors' program coordinator was not contacted by the foster parent regarding the overpayment. EFFECT Overpayments were made to foster parents receiving unaccompanied refugee minors' funds. CONTEXT There were 529 unaccompanied minor foster payments that occurred during our audit period of July 1, 2022, through June 30, 2024, for a total of $799,439. The audit selected a random sample of seven of 28 unaccompanied minors and tested 95 payments to the foster parents of these minors. The audit identified one known error in the amount of $29,000. When projected to the population, additional likely questioned costs of $160,247 were calculated. Where sampling was performed, the audit used a non-statistical sampling method. IDENTIFICATION AS A REPEAT FINDING Not a repeat finding. RECOMMENDATION We recommend the Department of Human Services develop a corrective action plan to address the errors identified in the audit and recover payments made on unsupported claims. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES RESPONSE The Department of Health and Human Services agrees with the recommendation. See “Management’s Response and Corrective Action” section of this report.

Corrective Action Plan

Department of Health and Human Services Response/Corrective Action Plan The Department of Health and Human Services agrees with the recommendation. HHS has begun the process of recoupment and will work to receive full repayment, to date the balance remaining was $5,000 and a payment plan has been sent up to recoup the remaining amount. The Accounts Payable team will collaborate with OMB to implement additional processes within Peoplesoft to verify payment information in the future. Currently, we are working to add display options in the Mass Voucher Approval screen to allow for tallying of the totals of vouchers in range. This addition will enhance the review step to ensure payments are consistent with Program totals for a secondary check before approval of payments are made. Contact Person: Karol Riedman, Assistant CFO Ann Scott, AP Accounting Manager Anticipated Completion Date: 06/30/2025

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →
2024-011
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability
QUESTIONED COSTS
Condition

CONDITION Providers did not submit proper documentation for care provided to individuals. The audit requested supporting documentation for tested claims from the providers and found errors in 1 of the total 25 claims tested by the auditors. The error resulted in an improper payment totaling $176. When projected to the entire population, the additional likely federal questioned costs totaled $281,698. CRITERIA 45 CFR 75.303 states that the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Money Follows the Person (MFP) is a federally funded Medicaid program. • 42 CFR 431.960 (c) (1) states a medical review error is an error resulting in an overpayment or underpayment that is determined from a review of the provider's medical record or other documentation supporting the service(s) claimed, Code of Federal Regulations that are applicable to conditions of payment, the State's written policies, and a comparison between the documentation and written policies and the information presented on the claim resulting in Federal and/or State improper payments. • 42 CFR 431.960 (c) (3) states medical review errors include, but are not limited to, the following: (i) lack of documentation, (ii) insufficient documentation, and (iii) procedure coding errors. CAUSE DHHS was not able to obtain the required documentation after multiple requests. EFFECT An unallowable payment was made to the provider who did not submit proper documentation when selected for audit. CONTEXT There were 28,533 MFP claims that occurred during our audit period of July 1, 2022, through June 30, 2024. The federal portion of the projected likely questioned costs was calculated by using the average federal matching rate for claims paid during the period of the claim. Where sampling was performed, the audit used a non-statistical sampling method. IDENTIFICATION AS A REPEAT FINDING Not a repeat finding. RECOMMENDATION We recommend the Department of Human Services develop a corrective action plan to address the errors identified in the audit and recover payments made on unsupported claims. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES RESPONSE The Department of Health and Human Services agrees with the recommendation. See “Management’s Response and Corrective Action” section of this report.

Corrective Action Plan

Department of Health and Human Services Response/Corrective Action Plan The Department of Health and Human Services agrees with the recommendation. The department will develop and implement a process whereby any provider who fails to respond to a request for records as part of an audit or program integrity review by the established deadline will be subject to a corrective sanction process. This process will include a pre-payment review of claims for a designated period. Additionally, the department will continue to recover payments made on unsupported claims. Contact Person: Sarah Aker, Medicaid Executive Director Anticipated Completion Date: 12/31/2025

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →
2024-012
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability
QUESTIONED COSTS
Condition

CONDITION The Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) charged WIC special formula distribution center food outlay costs to the wrong Federal fiscal year. CRITERIA Federal regulation, 2 CFR 200.403(h), states, in part, in order to be allowable under Federal awards, costs must be incurred during the approved budget period. Federal regulation, 2 CFR 200.303, requires non-Federal entities, in part, to establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. CAUSE The Department of Health and Human Services does not have a procedure to ensure special formula distribution center food outlays are applied to the correct Federal fiscal year. EFFECT The WIC special formula distribution center food outlay costs charged to the wrong Federal fiscal year resulted in unallowable costs to the Federal fiscal year in which they were charged since the costs were outside of the period of performance for grant. This also impacted the accuracy of Federal fiscal year expenses reported to USDA Food and Nutrition Services. CONTEXT State agencies can only charge allowable costs for obligations incurred during the grant's period of performance. The WIC grant is available for one year, October 1 through September 30, and only obligations incurred during that period can be charged to the grant. The Department of Health and Human Services incurred costs in August 2022 for FFY 2022 for special formula distribution center food outlays that were paid in February 2023 and charged to FFY 2023. A random sample test identified a known error amount is $15,451 with likely projected questioned costs of $71,642. Twenty-six special formula distribution center payments were made during the audit period totaling $604,441. Aside from the projection and based on support provided by DHHS, eight special formula distribution center payments, in addition to the known error from sample testing, totaling $198,289, are likely charged to the incorrect Federal fiscal year. Where sampling was performed, the audit used a non-statistical sampling method. IDENTIFICATION AS A REPEAT FINDING Not a repeat finding. RECOMMENDATION We recommend the Department of Health and Human Services establish procedures to ensure WIC special formula distribution center food outlay costs are charged to the proper Federal fiscal year. We also recommend the Department of Health and Human Services work with U.S. Food and Nutrition Services to complete a post closeout adjustment to accurately reflect expenses within the correct Federal fiscal years. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES RESPONSE The Department of Health and Human Services agrees with the recommendation. See “Management’s Response and Corrective Action” section of this report.

Corrective Action Plan

Department of Health and Human Services Response/Corrective Action Plan The Department of Health and Human services agrees with the recommendation. WIC special formula distribution costs from August 2022 were invoiced in January 2023, exceeding the 120-day closeout period for the FFY22 grant. HHS has addressed the issue with the vendor and will follow up to ensure future invoices are received promptly and aligned with the correct fiscal year. Contact Person: Karol Riedman, Assistant CFO Anticipated Completion Date: August 28, 2024

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →
2024-013
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability / Eligibility
Condition

CONDITION The Department of Health and Human Services, Emergency Rental Assistance (ERA) program, bypassed its two tier review process used for determining program eligibility and the approved funding decision amount that is paid to ERA recipients. Approximately 10% of all ERA payments during the audit period, totaling approximately $8.2 million, were paid from eligibility determinations where the two tier review was bypassed. CRITERIA • 2 CFR 200.303 states that the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. • DHHS's ERA Policies & Procedures outlines its Tier 1 and Tier 2 reviews for its ERA application eligibility process. CAUSE The Department of Health and Human Services, Emergency Rental Assistance (ERA) program, did not require its two tier review of ERA applications and assistance amounts during the entirety of the audit period. The program experienced significant influxes of applications at various times during the audit period which caused a backlog on application processing. To help ensure individuals applying for assistance weren't excessively delayed, the program decided to bypass its two tier review process of eligibility and funding decision amount to alleviate backlog more quickly. EFFECT The Department determined applicant program eligibility and made assistance payments through a single reviewer process resulting in a higher risk of both program ineligibility and inaccurate payment amounts. While no eligibility errors were identified through compliance testing, the bypass of its two tier review process created a control environment inadequate to reduce the risk of eligibility related errors. It was noted that Federal ERA FAQ Guidance states that, "grantees are encouraged to rely on a household's self-attestations for purposes of confirming eligibility" (FAQ 1) and "the grantee may rely on a self-attestation of household income without further verification if the applicant confirms in their application or other document that they are unable to provide documentation of their income" (FAQ 4). CONTEXT During the audit period, the program paid over $85 million of Federal ERA assistance to those with housing instability or risk of homelessness. Approximately $8.2 million of these payments did not go through the program's two tier eligibility review process. This translates to 7,853 out of the 94,172 payment numbers during the audit period having the same reviewer for both tier 1 and tier 2 review. The State Auditor's Office performed eligibility testing of 60 applications and the associated assistance payments and did not identify any eligibility errors. More specifically, 20 of the 60 tested were from the applications with the same reviewer for both tier 1 and tier 2 review. While the 20 had the same reviewer for both tiers of review, no errors were identified in the testing of eligibility. Where sampling was performed, the audit used a non-statistical sampling method. IDENTIFICATION AS A REPEAT FINDING Not a repeat finding. RECOMMENDATION We recommend the Department of Health and Human Services follow its ERA program policies and procedures surrounding its two tier eligibility review process to ensure the control environment reduces the risk of eligibility determination related errors and associated funding decision errors. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES RESPONSE The Department of Health and Human Services agrees with the recommendation. See “Management’s Response and Corrective Action” section of this report.

Corrective Action Plan

Department of Health and Human Services Response/Corrective Action Plan HHS agrees with the recommendation. During a period of high application volume, HHS temporarily bypassed its two-stage review process, assigning supervisors to review cases directly. The audit found no errors in eligibility during this time. To address this, HHS updated policies to document exceptions, including thresholds for initiating and ending them, ensuring transparency. Training sessions are being conducted to familiarize staff with these updates, and weekly monitoring of application volumes continues to anticipate surges. Contingency hiring plans and cross-training initiatives are in place to reduce future exceptions. Periodic reviews will ensure compliance, fostering a scalable, accountable process while maintaining high standards during peak periods. These measures ensure consistency and preparedness moving forward. Contact Person: Jessica Thomasson, Executive Policy Director Anticipated Completion Date: August 2024

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles, Eligibility →
2024-014
Reporting
REPEAT
Condition

CONDITION The Department of Public Instruction (DPI) did not report Child Nutrition Cluster subawards to the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) correctly. After testing FFATA reporting for the Child Nutrition Cluster, it was discovered that there were FFATA errors in the following areas: 1. The Department of Public Instruction did not report the subaward information timely for the Child Nutrition Cluster (CNC) (Assistance Listing number 10.553, 10.555, 10.559) for the 2023 grant year awards (October 2022-September 2023). After an analysis of grants awarded in 2023, we randomly sampled and pulled 11 awards to test. We found that all 11 were not submitted timely. The samples we pulled should have been reported by 4/30/23, 6/30/23, 7/31/23, 9/30/23, 11/30/23, and 1/31/24, but were not reported until 4/3/24 or 4/5/24. DPI explained that this occurred because all CNP reports from March to October of 2023 had to be resubmitted due to the wrong FEIN # being used on the reports. DPI resubmitted these reports on 4/3/24 and 4/5/24. The resubmitting of reports over a year later and without evidence that the reports were initially submitted timely is the reason for the audit finding. Those grant awards totaled $328,815.19. 2. The Department of Public Instruction did not report the subaward information timely for the Child Nutrition Cluster (Assistance Listing number 10.553, 10.555, 10.556, 10.559) for the 2024 grant year awards (October 2023-September 2024). After an analysis of grant awards awarded in 2024, we randomly sampled and pulled 4 awards to test. We found one of the four was not reported timely to FFATA. The report should have been submitted by 1/31/24 but it wasn't reported until 3/4/24. 3. The Department of Public Instruction did not report the subaward information for the Child Nutrition Cluster (Assistance Listing number 10.553, 10.555, 10.556, 10.559) for program months November and December of 2023 of the October 2023-September 2024 grant year. After an analysis of grant awards for that grant year and as reported to the auditor by DPI, it was discovered that 133 subawards should have been reported to FFATA, totaling $1,437,209.93. 4. The Department of Public Instruction did not properly report the subaward action/obligation date in the FSRS system for the Child Nutrition Cluster (Assistance Listing number 10.553, 10.555, 10.556, 10.559, 10.582). DPI staff run the FFATA report from the ND Foods system at the end of every month which is then uploaded into the FSRS system. In the FSRS system, it is listing the subaward action /obligation date as the day the report was pulled which is not the same day that payments are actually made. DPI reported the wrong subaward action/obligation date for all Child Nutrition Cluster samples that were pulled. There is no dollar error for these awards, only the obligation date. CRITERIA Federal regulation 2 CFR 170, Appendix A requires a Federal Financial Assistance Transparency Act (FFATA) report for each subaward that equals or exceeds $30,000 no later than the end of the month following the month in which the obligation was made. 2 CFR 200.303(a) states that non-Federal entities must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. CAUSE DPI does not have adequate policies and procedures to ensure accurate and timely reporting for FFATA EFFECT Not meeting the FFATA requirements increases the likelihood that the public will not have access to transparent and accurate information regarding expenditures of federal awards. Additionally, federal regulations address actions that federal agencies may impose if a state entity does not comply with the U.S. Constitution, federal statutes, regulations, or the terms and conditions of a federal award. According to 2 CFR 200.208(c), “Specific conditions,” these actions may include • requiring reimbursement instead of advance payments; • not allowing the agency to proceed to the next phase until it submits evidence of acceptable performance; • requiring additional, more detailed financial reports or additional project monitoring; • requiring the agency to obtain technical or management assistance; or • establishing other prior approvals. If the federal agency determines the state agency cannot remedy its noncompliance through the above actions, 2 CFR 200.339, “Remedies for noncompliance,” outlines additional actions the federal agency may take. Depending on the circumstances, these actions may include: • temporarily withholding payments until the noncompliance has been corrected, • Denying the use of funds, • partly or fully suspending or terminating the federal award, • suspending or debarring the agency, • withholding further awards for the project or program, or • pursuing other available legal remedies. CONTEXT During our audit period, there were 407 subrecipients receiving Federal grant awards for the Child Nutrition Cluster program totaling $68,351,704. Out of the 407 subrecipients, 309 were over the $30,000 threshold and should have been reported to FFATA. In 2023, there were 164 subrecipients and, in 2024, 145 subrecipients that met the threshold, for a total of $66,879,778. Where sampling was performed, the audit used a non-statistical sampling method. IDENTIFICATION AS A REPEAT FINDING Finding 2022-022 was reported in the immediate prior year. The prior audit finding was reported as implemented on the summary schedule of prior audit findings. This materially misrepresents the status of the finding. RECOMMENDATION We recommend the Department of Public Instruction implement policies and procedures to ensure timely and accurate submission of FFATA reports in accordance with federal regulations. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION RESPONSE The Department of Public Instruction agrees with the issues identified. See “Management’s Response and Corrective Action” section of this report.

Corrective Action Plan

Department of Public Instruction Response/Corrective Action Plan: We agree with the issues identified. 1. NDDPI acknowledges the late reports in FSRS.gov from October 2022 to September 2023. As stated in the finding, the reports were initially reported, but according to the Helpdesk with FSRS.gov, they required removal to re-submit using the corrected FAIN numbers. NDDPI administrators were not aware that the reports initially filed would be deleted from the records, versus the incorrect reports becoming labeled as inactive and saved for historical purposes. Kim Vega, Administrative Officer with NDDPI will review current archive processes and determine where changes may be needed. The FSRS website will be eliminated as the reporting application for FFATA in the Spring of 2025, and from that time forward, will be performed in the SAM.gov application. Currently, NDDPI administrators are participating in training and presentations for the test website and will continue to watch for any changes to administrative tasks. An introduction of the new website’s capabilities did address enhancing the feature for deleted reports as a part of the user’s tasks rather than the Helpdesk’s responsibility. NDDPI will continue to follow this development while in training for SAM.gov reporting. With the changes in application sites, the future enhancement in ND Foods will include an Application Programming Interface (API) for FFATA reporting. This API will provide the capability of real-time reporting, eliminate most manual tasks, increase report accuracy, and improve team member productivity and efficiency. The new website also mentions the zip code validation as an upgraded process. This process in the current system has been an intense time drain for staff members who enter FFATA by manual entry or batch upload, so improved functionality in this area is a much-needed upgrade. 2. NDDPI acknowledges the submission of the late report leading up to March 2024 as stated in item number 1. Reports for the meal claims were not reported in FSRS.gov until the FAIN numbers and programming were corrected in ND Foods, and a new Excel report was written with the corrections. Therefore, the report was not submitted within the required deadline. NDDPI Administrative officer worked with the Child Nutrition Administrative Staff Officer and NDIT programmers to correct the programming and process new reports for batch upload. 3. NDDPI acknowledges the missing reports for November and December 2023. During the transition from one claim year to the following, multiple reports must be run in ND Foods to complete the block FFATA reports. In 2023, NDDPI administrators were not aware of the overlap of claim years and how it would affect reporting, and therefore, only the current-year reports were processed. Currently, ND Foods has been upgraded to include an automated feature for FFATA reporting to include the final claims from the prior year and the new year’s claims in its reports for batch upload. Every effort was made to report both the old claim year and the new claim year in 2024. 4. NDDPI administrators have reviewed the reporting dates and the obligation date for claims in the CN block reporting, and we have agreed on the federal guidance which indicates the awards are obligated in advance will have the date of signature or acceptance at NDDPI, and the batch upload for payments made to an award will have the action or obligation date of the approval date for payment. This process will correct the reporting dates for claim payment processing (10.559, 10.555, 10.558, 10.556, 10.553) or reporting month for an obligated award (10.582) and its required obligation date. NDDPI staff members should be able to test and implement a programming change in our current reporting system in the next 2 months. If this change proves to be more intense than planned, we will wait on a quick fix until the upcoming interface upgrade with Sam.gov. We know the interfacing upgrade will require an even greater amount of time, energy, and money, and it will be a change we must complete; therefore, if the quick fix proves to be ineffective and time-consuming, the change in reporting will wait until the programming begins for the API Interface. Currently, federal officials are reporting the transfer between reporting sites will be ‘Spring of 2025’ but are not giving users a specific date. We have consolidated the coordination of FFATA reporting to a single individual rather than having each area do their own. We will prepare and implement procedures for the FFATA reporting. Contact Person: Jamie Mertz, CFO Anticipated Completion Date: June 30, 2025

Prior Finding References

2022-022

About Reporting →
2024-015
Eligibility
REPEATQUESTIONED COSTS
Condition

CONDITION The Department of Public Instruction incorrectly included neglected or delinquent facilities as part of their Title IIA allocation to Local Educational Agencies (LEA). We selected a sample of 17 in 2022-2023 and 17 in 2023-2024. Of the 17 samples in 2022-2023, we identified a 100% error rate. The total known allocation error identified was $60,026. This amount was the total allocated to negligent and delinquent districts. By allocating this amount to the noneligible districts, the eligible school districts were under allocated by the same amount. This was issue was fixed by the department for the 2023-2024 year and no error were found during the testing of 2023-2024. CRITERIA The Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (ESEA Section 2012(a)(1)) states, the State, acting through the State Educational Agency (DPI), shall award subgrants to eligible local educational agencies (LEA). 2 CFR 200.303(a) states that non-Federal entities must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulation, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (ESEA Section 8101(30) states "the term local educational agency means a public board of education or other public authority legally constituted within a state for either administrative control or direction of, or to perform a service function for, public elementary schools or secondary schools in a city, county, township, school district, or other political subdivision of a state, or for a combination of school districts or counties that is recognized in a state administrative agency for its public elementary school or secondary schools." The Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (ESEA Section 1432) defines Institutions for Neglected or Delinquent Children and Youth as "a public or private residential facility, other than a foster home, that is operated for the care of children who have been committed to the institution or voluntarily placed in the institution under applicable State law, due to abandonment, neglect, or death of their parents or guardian; or a public or private residential facility for the care of children who have deemed adjudicated to be delinquent or in need of supervision." As Neglected and Delinquent Facilities are operated only for the care of old children who have been committed or placed in their institution due to abandonment, neglect, death of their parents or guardians, or in need of supervision, these facilities are not recognized as Local Educational Agency. CAUSE The Department of Public Instruction was unaware that neglected and delinquent facilities could not be included in their Title IIA allocation calculation and on subrecipient's grant awards. EFFECT The Department of Public Instruction did not comply with the allocation requirements to LEAs for Title IIA grants. The LEAs eligible to receive funding were allocated less than they should have. CONTEXT The Department of Public Instruction allocated $9,834,095 in Federal funds to 169 school districts during the 2022-2023 school year and $9,939,938 in Federal funds to 169 school districts during the 2023-2024 school year. Where sampling was performed, the audit used a non-statistical sampling method. IDENTIFICATION AS A REPEAT FINDING Finding 2022-032 was reported in the immediate prior year. The prior audit finding was reported as implemented on the summary schedule of prior audit findings. This materially misrepresents the status of the finding. RECOMMENDATION We recommend the Department of Public Instruction ensure the Title IIA allocations are calculated based on the Federal requirements. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION RESPONSE The Department of Public Instruction agrees with the finding. See “Management’s Response and Corrective Action” section of this report.

Corrective Action Plan

Department of Public Instruction Response/Corrective Action Plan: We agree with the finding. The issue has already been corrected as stated in the finding. Contact Person: Jamie Mertz, CFO Anticipated Completion Date: The issue has already been corrected.

Prior Finding References

2022-032

About Eligibility →
2024-016
Subrecipient Monitoring
REPEAT
Condition

CONDITION The Department of Public Instruction did not ensure all subrecipients submitted a Single Audit Report or a form identifying a Single Audit is not required. In addition, The Department of Public Instruction did not issue management decisions on audit findings within 6 months or ensure that timely and appropriate corrective action was taken in all applicable instances. CRITERIA 2 CFR 200.331(f) states that a pass-through entity must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by 2 CFS 200 Subpart F. 2 CFR 200.311(d)(2) states that a pass-through entity must ensure subrecipients take timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity through audits, on-site reviews, and other means. 2 CFR 200.521(d) states that a pass-through entity must issue a management decision within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the Federal Audit Clearinghouse (FAC). 2 CFR 200.303(a) states that non-federal entities must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with statutes, regulations, and the terms and condition of the federal award. CAUSE The Department of Public Instruction maintains a spreadsheet to track all subrecipient audit report monitoring, however, they did not ensure that everyone on the spreadsheet provided a Single Audit report, or review the filed report within 6 months, or provided a certification of total federal expenditures. EFFECT Subrecipients spending more than $750,000 from all federal sources may not be obtaining audits as required or may not be implementing a corrective action plan in a timely manner if findings are noted in audits that were completed. The Department of Public instruction is not meeting the requirements of 2 CFR 200 Subpart F. CONTEXT The total number of subrecipients was 536 and the total amount received from the Department of Public Instruction was $667,731,290. Where sampling was performed, the audit used a non-statistical sampling method. Of all the subrecipients that had errors, the total amount they received from the Department of Public Instruction was $53,403,270. Sixty subrecipients that received funds from the Department of Public Instruction were included in our sampling. One subrecipient was not included on the Departments tracking spreadsheet, two subrecipients did not received the required audit as required by 2 CFR Subpart F. 10 Subrecipients had reports filed, but the Department did not review the report within the required 6 month window. IDENTIFICATION AS A REPEAT FINDING Finding 2022-033 was reported in the immediate prior year. Findings 2020-021 and 2018-041 were reported in previous years. The prior audit finding was reported as implemented on the summary schedule of prior audit findings. This materially misrepresents the status of the finding. RECOMMENDATION We recommend the Department of Public Instruction: • Ensure all subrecipients obtain audits in accordance with 2 CFR 200 Subpart F if they meet the requirements; • Issue management decisions within a timely manner; • Ensure subrecipients took timely corrective action on deficiencies identified in the audits. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION RESPONSE The Department of Public Instruction agrees with the finding. See “Management’s Response and Corrective Action” section of this report.

Corrective Action Plan

Department of Public Instruction Response/Corrective Action Plan: DPI agrees with the finding. We have split the duties of subrecipient review among two employees. One person does the administrative functions and responses to subrecipients who have no findings. The other employee works on the more complex audit reviews. We feel that this change along with the increase to the audit threshold and the end of the COVID related federal funding will allow us to stay in compliance of federal regulations. Contact Person: Jamie Mertz, CFO Anticipated Completion Date: This was implemented January 2, 2025

Prior Finding References

2022-033

About Subrecipient Monitoring →
2024-017
Subrecipient Monitoring
REPEAT
Condition

CONDITION The Department of Public Instruction did not make subrecipients aware of all required grant award information for the Special Education Cluster, Title 1, Supporting Effective Instruction, Child and Adult Care Food Program, and Education Stabilization Fund. CRITERIA 2 CFR 200.332 requires pass-through entities to communicate specific required information to subrecipients. Required information includes: - Subrecipients name (Must match the name associated with its unique entity identifier) - Subrecipients unique entity identifier - Federal award identification number (FAIN) - Federal award date - Subaward period of performance start and end date - Amount of Federal funds obligated in the subaward - Total amount of Federal funds obligated to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity, including the current financial obligation - Total amount of the Federal award committed to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity - Federal award project description, as required by the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) - Name of the Federal agency, pass-through entity, and contact information for awarding official of the pass-through entity - Assistance listings title and number; the pass-through entity must identify the dollar amount made available under each federal award and the Assistance listings number at the time of disbursement - Identification of whether the Federal award is for research and development - Indirect cost rate for the Federal award (including if the de minimis rate is used) - All requirements of the subaward, including requirements imposed by federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and condition of the Federal award 2 CFR 200.303 requires non-Federal entities, in part, to establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. CAUSE Not all grant agreement requirements were entered into the grant award template. EFFECT Subrecipients may not have been aware of all necessary grant information and requirements. CONTEXT The number of grant agreements during the audit period is listed below. A. Special Education Cluster - 134 awards - 14 tested with 10 errors noted The following criteria were missing or incorrect: - Total amount of the Federal award committed to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity B. Title I program - 276 awards - 25 tested with 16 errors noted The following criteria were missing or incorrect: - Total amount of the Federal award committed to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity C. Supporting Effective Instruction - 278 awards - 25 tested with 21 errors noted The following criteria were missing or incorrect: - Subrecipients unique entity identifier - Federal award date - Federal award Identification Number (FAIN) - Total amount of the Federal award committed to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity D. Child and Adult Care Food Program - 134 awards - 14 tested with 2 errors noted The following criteria were missing or incorrect: - Subrecipients unique entity identifier - 1 subrecipient did not have a grant contract E. Education Stabilization Fund - 641 awards - 40 tested with 10 errors noted The following criteria were missing or incorrect: - Subrecipient name (1 sample did not have the correct subrecipient name on the grant award) - Subrecipients unique entity identifier (2 did not match the Subrecipient name on grant award) - Federal award date (8 awards did not have this) - Name of Federal awarding agency, pass-through entity, and contact information for awarding official of the Pass-through entity (6 awards did not include Name of Federal Awarding Agency (Dept of Education) on grant award) Where sampling was performed, the audit used a non-statistical sampling method. IDENTIFICATION AS A REPEAT FINDING Finding 2022-024 was reported in the immediate prior year. The prior audit finding was reported as implemented on the summary schedule of prior audit findings. This materially misrepresents the status of the finding. RECOMMENDATION We recommend the Department of Instruction update its grant award templates to ensure that subrecipients are made award of all required grant award information DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION RESPONSE The Department of Public Instruction agrees with the finding. See “Management’s Response and Corrective Action” section of this report.

Corrective Action Plan

Department of Public Instruction Response/Corrective Action Plan: We agree with the finding. We have updated our grant award templates to include all required information. Contact Person: Jamie Mertz, CFO Anticipated Completion Date: This has already been implemented effective 2/1/2025.

Prior Finding References

2022-024

About Subrecipient Monitoring →
2024-018
Reporting
REPEAT
Condition

CONDITION The audit tested quarterly Project and Expenditure reports of the State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF) program for the periods ending March 2023, December 2023, and June 2024. Project and Expenditure reports are prepared and submitted by the ND Office of Management and Budget. Errors in key line items in all three quarterly Project and Expenditures Reports tested were identified. Key line items with errors included current period expenditures, cumulative expenditures, and current period obligations. Current period expenditures reported on the March 2023 and December 2023 reports did not agree to the tracking spreadsheet used to prepare the report. The net unreconciled difference in current period expenditures for these quarters was $732,036. The reason for the difference included that OMB's own SLFRF expenditures were not reported in the proper period. Cumulative expenditures reported by OMB for all three covered periods did not agree to the tracking spreadsheet used to prepare the report. The state's actual cumulative expenditures were not determined since changes or revisions can be reflected in the next Project and Expenditures report. However, cumulative expenditures reported by OMB for the covered period ending June 30, 2024, totaled $686,652,130 while cumulative expenditures reported by agencies and universities on SEFAs for the same period totaled $670,946,688. The basis of accounting used to prepare the SEFA varies amongst the agencies and universities; however, the state's cumulative expenditures are expected to reconcile to the state's SLFRF allocation in its final Project and Expenditure Report. Current period obligations reported by OMB for the covered period ending June 30, 2024, totaled $93,696,726, which should have been $0. This error did not impact the cumulative obligation amount since OMB previously reported the state's SLFRF allotment was 100% obligated in the cumulative obligation amount for the covered period ending December 31, 2023. CRITERIA According to Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Compliance and Reporting Guidance, states are required to submit quarterly Project and Expenditure Reports. The 2023 and 2024 Compliance Supplements indicate the following line items are key line items: current period obligation, cumulative obligation, current period expenditure, and cumulative expenditure are key line items. In addition, report corrections cannot be made after the reporting deadline unless prompted by Treasury staff. Any changes or revisions will need to be reflected in the next Project and Expenditure report. 2 CFR 200.502 states that the determination of when a federal award is expended must be based on when the activity related to the award occurs. In general, the activity pertains to events that require the nonfederal entity to comply with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of federal awards. 2 CFR 200.303(a) states that non-Federal entities must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. CAUSE OMB manages State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds centrally and developed a process to reimburse agencies for their eligible expenditures once expenditures are incurred and agencies requested reimbursement. As a result, reimbursement from the state’s allocation of SLFRF moneys always occurs after the agency expenditure. Funds were included in the federal report for the period in which reimbursement to the agency occurred. In some cases, this resulted in the agency expenditure occurring in a period prior to the period covered under the quarterly SLFRF report. In addition, OMB's reporting process did not identify its own SLFRF expenditures in a timely manner. Lastly, OMB did not consistently utilize its tracking spreadsheet for reporting certain key line items. EFFECT State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF) data reported to the U.S. Department of Treasury in quarterly Project and Expenditures Reports was inaccurate. CONTEXT In March 2021, the Federal Department of Treasury obligated funds to all 50 states under the State Local and Fiscal Recovery Fund to help states mitigate negative economic impacts caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. In November 2021, the special session of the 67th legislature obligated use of the majority of the funds to various agencies across the state. As the state was able to show that the revenue lost in years 2020 and 2021 exceeded the amount of the obligation from the Department of Treasury, the state was able to claim use of these funds under revenue replacement which allowed the state to utilize them for 'government operations' in addition to other specific uses and also allowing the state to report use of these funds under a single 'revenue replacement' project. The agencies began using the funds for purposes after they were obligated by the state legislature and began recording expenditures against the grant throughout our audit period. When these funds were initially disbursed to the state in March 2021, the funds were received by OMB and OMB then transferred reimbursement to agencies on request. The remainder of the funds were obligated by the state legislature during the 68th Legislative Assembly, which included any turnback funds obligated in previous legislation. North Dakota's project description on the reports was consistent and based on legislative appropriation. As reported, "Due to its extraordinary revenue loss during the pandemic, North Dakota’s entire SLFRF allocation is dedicated to project expenditure category group 6 – Revenue Replacement. Consequently, all expenditures will fall under project expenditure category 6.1 – Provision of Government Services. Government services, as defined by the North Dakota legislature, includes economic development and workforce development initiatives, infrastructure and deferred maintenance initiatives, state service delivery and information technology improvements, and healthcare and emergency response initiatives." Cumulative expenditures reported by OMB for the covered period ending June 30, 2024, totaled $686,652,130. Cumulative expenditures reported by agencies and universities on SEFAs for the same period totaled $670,946,688; however, the basis of accounting used to prepare the SEFA varies amongst the agencies and universities. The state's cumulative expenditures are expected to reconcile to the state's SLFRF allocation in its final Project and Expenditure Report. Where sampling was performed, the audit used a non-statistical sampling method. IDENTIFICATION AS A REPEAT FINDING Finding 2022-035 was reported in the immediate prior year. RECOMMENDATION We recommend the Office of Management and Budget ensure quarterly Project and Expenditure Reports accurately report the State's SLFRF obligations and expenditures to the Department of Treasury. OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET RESPONSE The Office of Management agrees with this finding, but will continue federal reporting based on the timing of reimbursement of expenditures to other state agencies for the duration of the SLFRF reporting period. OMB will ensure all expenditures of SFLRF funding are accurately included in the reports based on the period of reimbursement. Because OMB is responsible for the state reporting under this program, it is necessary to maintain some level of control over these funds. Consequently, OMB manages the funds centrally and developed a process to reimburse agencies for their eligible expenditures once expenditures were incurred and agencies requested reimbursement. As a result, reimbursement from the state’s allocation of SLFRF moneys always occurs after the agency expenditure. Funds are included in the Federal report for the period in which reimbursement from the SLFRF occurs. In some cases, this results in the agency expenditure occurring in a period prior to the period covered under the quarterly SLFRF report in which the reimbursement is reported. To better track OMB expenditures of SLFRF moneys, which is a separate process from the reimbursement of other agencies, OMB will run specific expense reports for OMB agency expenditures to ensure all SLFRF expenses are reported in the proper period. See “Management’s Response and Corrective Action” section of this report. AUDITOR’S CONCLUDING COMMENTS While the Office of Management and Budget agrees with the finding, continuing Federal reporting based on the timing of reimbursed expenditures will likely cause further inaccurate SLFRF reporting. In addition, amounts transferred to agencies are not confirmed to not exceed incurred expenditures to ensure a reimbursement process is in place.

Corrective Action Plan

Office of Management and Budget Response/Corrective Action Plan: The Office of Management and Budget agrees with this finding. OMB agrees but will continue federal reporting based on the timing of reimbursement of expenditures to other state agencies for the duration of the SLFRF reporting period. OMB will ensure all expenditures of SFLRF funding are accurately included in the reports based on the period of reimbursement. Because OMB is responsible for the state reporting under this program, it is necessary to maintain some level of control over these funds. Consequently, OMB manages the funds centrally and developed a process to reimburse agencies for their eligible expenditures once expenditures were incurred and agencies requested reimbursement. As a result, reimbursement from the state’s allocation of SLFRF moneys always occurs after the agency expenditure. Funds are included in the Federal report for the period in which reimbursement from the SLFRF occurs. In some cases, this results in the agency expenditure occurring in a period prior to the period covered under the quarterly SLFRF report in which the reimbursement is reported. To better track OMB expenditures of SLFRF moneys, which is a separate process from the reimbursement of other agencies, OMB will run specific expense reports for OMB agency expenditures to ensure all SLFRF expenses are reported in the proper period. Contact Person: Elizabeth Roger, Account Budget Specialist Anticipated Completion Date: December 2026

Prior Finding References

2022-035

About Reporting →
2024-019
Subrecipient Monitoring
Condition

CONDITION The State Treasurer's Office did not make subrecipients aware of all required grant award information for the Mineral Leasing Act. CRITERIA 2 CFR 200.332 requires pass-through entities to communicate specific required information to subrecipients. Required information includes: - Subrecipients name (Must match the name associated with its unique entity identifier) - Subrecipients unique entity identifier - Federal award identification number (FAIN) - Federal award date - Subaward period of performance start and end date - Amount of Federal funds obligated in the subaward - Total amount of Federal funds obligated to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity, including the current financial obligation - Total amount of the Federal award committed to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity - Federal award project description, as required by the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) - Name of the Federal agency, pass-through entity, and contact information for awarding official of the pass-through entity - Assistance listings title and number; the pass-through entity must identify the dollar amount made available under each federal award and the Assistance listings number at the time of disbursement - Identification of whether the Federal award is for research and development - Indirect cost rate for the Federal award (including if the de minimis rate is used) - All requirements of the subaward, including requirements imposed by federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and condition of the Federal award 2 CFR 200.303 requires non-Federal entities, in part, to establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. CAUSE Not all grant agreement requirements were included in the grant award template. EFFECT Subrecipients may not have been aware of all necessary grant information and requirements. CONTEXT There were 40 awards during the audit period of 7/1/2022 - 6/30/2024. There were 8 awards tested with 8 errors noted. The following criteria were missing: - (ii) Subrecipient's unique entity identifier; - (iii) Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN); - (xiii) Identification of whether the award is R&D; and - (xiv) Indirect cost rate for the Federal award (including if the de minimis rate is charged) per § 200.414. - (4) (i) An approved federally recognized indirect cost rate negotiated between the subrecipient and the Federal Government. If no approved rate exists, the pass-through entity must determine the appropriate rate in collaboration with the subrecipient, which is either: (A) The negotiated indirect cost rate between the pass-through entity and the subrecipient; which can be based on a prior negotiated rate between a different PTE and the same subrecipient. If basing the rate on a previously negotiated rate, the pass-through entity is not required to collect information justifying this rate, but may elect to do so; (B) The de minimus indirect cost rate. (ii) The pass-through entity must not require use of a de minimis indirect cost rate if the subrecipient has a Federally approved rate. Subrecipients can elect to use the cost allocation method to account for indirect costs in accordance with § 200.405(d). - (6) Appropriate terms and conditions concerning closeout of the subaward. Where sampling was performed, the audit used a non-statistical sampling method. IDENTIFICATION AS A REPEAT FINDING Not a repeat finding. RECOMMENDATION We recommend the State Treasurer's Office update its grant award templates to ensure that subrecipients are made award of all required grant award information. STATE TREASURER’S OFFICE RESPONSE The Office of the State Treasurer does agree with finding that our grant award template did not make subrecipients aware of all required grant award information for the Mineral Leasing Act as required. See “Management’s Response and Corrective Action” section of this report.

Corrective Action Plan

State Treasurer’s Office Response/Corrective Action Plan: The Office of State Treasurer does agree with finding that our grant award template did not make subrecipients aware of all required grant award information for the Mineral Leasing Act as required. The Office of State Treasurer will review and update its grant award templates to ensure that subrecipients are made aware of all required grant award information. Contact Person: Nicole Krivoruchka, Director of Finance Anticipated Completion Date: December 31, 2025

About Subrecipient Monitoring →
2024-020
Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
MATERIAL WEAKNESSQUESTIONED COSTS
Condition

CONDITION We tested four infrastructure projects that used State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds: one new construction project at Bismarck State College – Polytechnic Building, one renovation project at Minot State University – Hartnett Hall, and one new construction project and one renovation project at University of North Dakota - Airport Apron and Merrifield Hall, respectively. We noted three of the four infrastructure projects tested did not follow procurement rules for architect and Construction Management at-Risk (CMaR) services. We noted the following: Bismarck State College - Polytechnic Building: • The amount of the contract was $42,205,831 and questioned costs were $25,253,685. • The CMaR selection committee was improperly composed as a registered engineer and a registered architect were unknown at the time of solicitation. • The CMaR request for qualifications were improperly evaluated as a registered engineer and a registered architect did not evaluate the submittals. Minot State University - Hartnett Hall: • The amount of the contract was $23,738,195 and questioned costs were $22,575,329. • Architect services were evaluated on a criteria item, understanding the project, which was not disclosed in the request for qualifications nor listed in N.D.C.C. There was no addendum issued. • The CMaR selection committee was improperly composed after the request for qualifications was issued. A change was made to the selection committee which left it with no registered architect. • The CMaR request for qualifications did not have all the required information in it; the number of persons to be included in the final list were not listed. • The CMaR request for qualifications were improperly evaluated as a registered architect did not evaluate the submittals. University of North Dakota - Merrifield Hall: • The amount of the contract was $40,829,950 and questioned costs were $27,554,154. • The CMaR selection committee was improperly composed as there was no registered engineer and the licensed contractor had an inactive license during part or all of their selection committee duties. • The CMaR request for proposal did not have all the required information in it. The selection committee members were not listed, the evaluating criteria and relative weight of each were not listed, and the number of persons to be included in the final list were not listed. • The CMaR request for proposals were improperly evaluated as a registered engineer did not evaluate the submittals, the licensed contractor had an inactive license during part or all of their selection committee duties – which includes evaluations, and the submittals were not evaluated on all of the required criteria – the person’s compliance with state and federal law was not evaluated. CRITERIA Uniform Guidance 2 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200.317, states in part, when conducting procurement transactions under a Federal award, a State must follow the same policies and procedures it uses for procurements with non-Federal funds. N.D.C.C. 54-44.7-03, subsection 5, states in part, the agency selection committee shall evaluate each of the persons or firms interviewed on the basis of the following criteria: a. Past performance. b. The ability of professional personnel. c. Willingness to meet time and budget requirements. d. Location, with higher priority given to firms headquartered in North Dakota. e. Recent, current, and projected workloads of the persons or firms. f. Related experience on similar projects. g. Recent and current work for the agency N.D.C.C. 48-01.2-20, subsection 1, states, A governing body electing to utilize a construction management at-risk delivery process for a proposed public improvement shall create a selection committee composed of: a. An administrative individual from the governing body. b. A registered architect. c. A registered engineer. d. A licensed contractor. N.D.C.C. 48-01.2-20, subsection 3, lists fourteen items that must be established as content in the request for qualifications, which includes the listing of selection committee members, the evaluating criteria and relative weight of each, and the number of persons to be included in the final list. N.D.C.C. 48-01.2-20, subsections 5 and 6, states that the selection committee needs to determine the appropriate evaluation criteria for the eight qualification criteria items listed. The selection committee shall evaluate each submission based on the qualification criteria items listed in subsection 5, which includes the person's compliance with state and federal law. Federal regulation, 2 CFR 200.303, requires non-Federal entities, in part, to establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statues, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. CAUSE Bismarck State College: • There may have been a slight confusion of what and which duties the selection committee was required to perform. Minot State University: • They are unsure why the additional criteria was used to evaluate the architect request for qualifications. • The selection committee changed after its initial composition leaving the selection committee with no registered architect. • The number of persons to be included in the final list was inadvertently overlooked. University of North Dakota: • They thought that a registered engineer would fulfill the selection committee requirement; however, their registered engineer was registered in Nebraska not North Dakota. The licensed contractor had a lapse in an active license for all or part of their selection committee duties. • The required information in the request for proposal and the proper evaluating criteria was an oversight. EFFECT By not following N.D.C.C. for the architect and CMaR services, these service contracts may have been awarded incorrectly. CONTEXT Bismarck State College, Minot State University and the University of North Dakota were allocated $35 million, $25 million, and $55 million, respectively, from the state fiscal recovery fund for specific renovation and construction projects. These institutions were allowed to enter into contracts to procure goods and services with only a subset of federal procurement requirements being applicable to this type of federal funding - recipients must adhere to the same policies and procedures they use for non-federal procurements. These three institutions were allocated a total $115 million from the state fiscal recovery fund and improperly awarded $106.8 million in contracts due to not adhering to procurement rules. $75.4 million was spent on these improperly awarded contracts during our audit period. Where sampling was performed, the audit used a non-statistical sampling method. IDENTIFICATION AS A REPEAT FINDING Not a repeat finding. RECOMMENDATION We recommend that Bismarck State College, Minot State University and the University of North Dakota update their procedures to review and adhere to both the architect and Construction Management at-Risk selection processes to ensure compliance with the N.D.C.C. surrounding procurement for construction projects. UNIVERSITY SYSTEM RESPONSE Bismarck State College agrees with the recommendation. Minot State University agrees with the recommendation. University of North Dakota agrees with the recommendation. See “Management’s Response and Corrective Action” section of this report.

Corrective Action Plan

University System Response/Corrective Action Plan Bismarck State College: Agree. On the published RFQ, Bismarck State College identified a selection committee composed of nine members with the registered engineer and registered architect listed as TBD, as these members had not yet been identified. The selection committee later downsized to seven members. Bismarck State College understands that an amendment to the RFQ should have been released. Four selection committee members evaluated the RFQ submittals, three from Bismarck State College and a licensed contractor. Bismarck State College understands that all seven members must be present during the initial review. Bismarck State College did have all seven members present, including a registered engineer and registered architect during the interviews and final decision when selecting the CMAR. Bismarck State College has reviewed the selection process and will adhere to ensure compliance for construction projects. Minot State University: Minot State agrees with the audit recommendation in that not all the proper steps were completed in the procurement of architect and Construction Management at Risk (CMaR) services and will ensure proper procedures are followed going forward. Upon review, Minot State is confident that all Hartnett Hall remodel project expenses are appropriate, allowable, and allocable to the project. University of North Dakota: Agree. The University of North Dakota's solicitation templates for A/E and CMAR have been moved to an electronic system effective 2023, and our templates were updated with the correct proposal criteria at that time. Contact Person: Bismarck State College: Sonya Koble – Chief Financial Officer Minot State University: Krista Lambrecht, VP for Administration & Finance University of North Dakota: Tom Scrivener, CPO Anticipated Completion Date: Bismarck State College: September 2024 Minot State University: Immediately University of North Dakota: Completed.

About Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →
2024-021
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability
MATERIAL WEAKNESSQUESTIONED COSTS
Condition

CONDITION North Dakota State University and the University of North Dakota were not certifying payroll expenditures by the deadlines stated in their payroll certification policies. We noted 7 out of 40 payroll checks tested had payroll expenditures for that semester that wasn't certified in a timely manner. This resulted in unapproved payroll expenditures of $74,051 being charged to the Research and Development Cluster. When projected against the entire population, the additional likely questioned cost totaled $13,998,284. CRITERIA In 2 CFR 200.430 compensation-personal services part (g) (i) when discussing Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses states in part, “be supported by a system of internal control that provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated." The North Dakota State University's overview of Effort Reporting states in part that North Dakota State University has three effort reporting periods which follow the University’s semester schedule: August 16 – December 31, January 1 – May 15, May 16 – August 15. Approximately 15 days after each effort reporting period, the Grant and Contract Office will generate effort certification reports which are to be reviewed, signed, and returned within 30 days after the department receives them. The University of North Dakota's Sponsored Project Payroll Confirmation policy states in part that at the end of each semester, after payroll posts (on or about January 15, May 31, and August 31) compliance coordinators (CC) will receive an email notifying them the pre review period has opened. It goes on to state to be considered complete, the Project Payroll Statement (PPS) must be: • Pre-review by the primary CC or other non-primary CC as assigned. • Certified by the project principal investigator or their delegate as assigned. Only after both steps are accomplished is the PPS considered complete. If statements are not completed by 30 days after the end of 90-day certification period, Grants & Contracts will transfer federal salary charges corresponding to the incomplete statement to a department fund. The University of North Dakota's 'Guidelines for Effort Commitment & Payroll Certification Associated with Sponsored Projects' states in part that in general, payroll must be certified within 90 days of the date on which the certification window opens. Payroll must be certified on a semester basis. CAUSE Principal Investigators (PI's) are not understanding the requirements per the North Dakota State University and University of North Dakota policy which state a specific time period in which this task of certifying the payroll should be completed. EFFECT Without timely certification of payroll expenses by the Principal Investigator (PI), there is the potential for erroneous payroll amounts charged to a grant, unallowed payroll amounts charged to a grant, and/or payroll expense charged to the wrong grant, and not detected until it's too late to be corrected. CONTEXT North Dakota State University and the University of North Dakota are not certifying payroll expenses by the deadlines stated in their payroll certification policies. Total payroll expenditures for our audit period ($98,503,735) make up a significant portion of all Research and Development Cluster program expenses ($220,862,918) and thus these late payroll certification issues are a critical noncompliance deviation. Where sampling was performed, the audit used a non-statistical sampling method. IDENTIFICATION AS A REPEAT FINDING Not a repeat finding. RECOMMENDATION We recommend that the North Dakota State University and the University of North Dakota certify their federal payroll expenses in a timely matter to provide reasonable assurance the amounts are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated to the specific project/grant. UNIVERSITY SYSTEM RESPONSE North Dakota State University agrees with the finding. University of North Dakota agrees with the finding. See “Management’s Response and Corrective Action” section of this report.

Corrective Action Plan

University System Response/Corrective Action Plan North Dakota State University: Agree. North Dakota State University agrees to certify federal payroll expenses in a timely manner. North Dakota State University implemented a new payroll certification system which went live Spring 2024. Previously, North Dakota State University utilized a manual effort reporting process as part of PeopleSoft. The new payroll certification process was built into Novelution Research Management System, which supports multiple aspects of grant management. Novelution allows PIs to review salary information and certify within the software, provides automated reminder emails, and provides a better tracking mechanism for compliance. There has been a learning curve in utilizing the new system, and during FY2025 we continued to refine the process and implement additional mechanisms to improve compliance. University of North Dakota: Agree. In accordance with University of North Dakota’s policy, we will remind pre-reviewers and certifiers of University of North Dakota's requirement for timely certification. As outlined in the policy, we will invoke the consequences for failing to timely certify, including removing uncertified payroll from a project. Contact Person: North Dakota State University: Karin Hegstad, Associate Vice President Finance & Administration University of North Dakota: Lauren Pite, Director Grants & Contracts Anticipated Completion Date: North Dakota State University: June 30, 2025 University of North Dakota: March 31, 2025

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →
2024-022
Subrecipient Monitoring
QUESTIONED COSTS
Condition

CONDITION In the 26 subrecipient awards tested, we found that the University of North Dakota did not sufficiently assess risk for 21 of those. Of the 21 subrecipient awards that were not sufficiently risk assessed, the following was noted: • There was no risk assessment completed for 12 subaward agreements (46%). • Risk assessment forms were completed after 9 subaward agreements had been issued (35%). CRITERIA 2 CFR 200.332 (c) states in part: Evaluate each subrecipient's fraud risk and risk of noncompliance with a subaward to determine the appropriate subrecipient monitoring described in paragraph (f) of this section. When evaluating a subrecipient's risk, a pass-through entity should consider the following: (1) The subrecipient's prior experience with the same or similar subawards; (2) The results of previous audits. This includes considering whether or not the subrecipient receives a Single Audit in accordance with subpart F and the extent to which the same or similar subawards have been audited as a major program; (3) Whether the subrecipient has new personnel or new or substantially changed systems; and (4) The extent and results of any Federal agency monitoring (for example, if the subrecipient also receives Federal awards directly from the Federal agency). During our audit period, University of North Dakota's operating practices stated that a risk assessment was to be completed on each subrecipient entity before a subaward agreement is issued. Institutional, project and threshold questions on the form assess risk of a subrecipient regardless of funding source. The risk assessment will determine whether a risk mitigation strategy should be developed and whether additional requirements should be imposed on the subrecipient. Federal regulation, 2 CFR 200.303, requires non-Federal entities, in part, to establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statues, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. CAUSE University of North Dakota did not have adequate procedures in place to properly monitor subrecipients. EFFECT The University of North Dakota took on additional risk with each subrecipient by not adequately assessing the risk. Each may have a high risk of noncompliance with federal requirements. Additionally, evaluation of risk plays a role in determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring activities for each subrecipient. As risk assessments were not completed in a timely manner, risk-appropriate monitoring activities may not have been performed. CONTEXT The University of North Dakota had payments to subrecipients that totaled $25,929,781 during fiscal years 2023 and 2024. The University of North Dakota did not properly complete risk assessments for 21 out of 26 subaward agreements tested. Where sampling was performed, the audit used a non-statistical sampling method. IDENTIFICATION AS A REPEAT FINDING Not a repeat finding. RECOMMENDATION We recommend that the University of North Dakota implement procedures to ensure risk assessments forms are completed prior the grant award being issued to provide assurance that appropriate subrecipient monitoring will be performed. UNIVERSITY SYSTEM RESPONSE University of North Dakota agrees with the finding. See “Management’s Response and Corrective Action” section of this report.

Corrective Action Plan

University System Response/Corrective Action Plan Agree. A new Subrecipient Policy and new Subrecipient Monitoring Procedure were put in place effective November 2024. In accordance with the new Policy and Procedure, risk assessments are being completed before subaward agreements are issued. Contact Person: Lauren Pite, Director Grants & Contracts Anticipated Completion Date: Completed

About Subrecipient Monitoring →
2024-023
Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
QUESTIONED COSTS
Condition

CONDITION The University of North Dakota did not follow procurement guidelines in the Research and Development Cluster. We tested 40 items total and 18 of those were for the University of North Dakota. We found two issues (11%) and $115,258 in questioned costs for those two errors. The errors were comprised of the following: • No documentation was provided to ensure the proper procurement was completed for the purchase of a software license for $116,431. During our audit period, the University of North Dakota expended $39,928 of federal grant funds for the software license. • Two pieces of equipment were purchased totaling $100,440 and formal bidding was not competed. During the audit period, $75,330 was expended with federal grant funds for the equipment. When projected against the entire population, the additional likely questioned cost totaled $489,720. CRITERIA Uniform Guidance 2 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200.317, states in part that when conducting procurement transactions under a Federal award, a State must follow the same policies and procedures it uses for procurements with non-Federal funds. 2 CFR 200.318 Ii) states in part that the recipient or subrecipient must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of each procurement transaction. These records must include the rationale for the procurement method, contract type selection, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. North Dakota University System Procedure 803.1 states in part that for purchases of $100,000 and over must be purchased using formal sealed bids or a request for proposal. Solicitations must be posted using SPO online with appropriate state bidders list. Federal regulation, 2 CFR 200.303, requires non-Federal entities, in part, to establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statues, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. CAUSE University of North Dakota did not follow procurement requirements when purchasing property and services. EFFECT Without following federal and state procurement rules, the University of North Dakota cannot ensure they are properly purchasing property and services at the best available price. CONTEXT The University of North Dakota had purchases requiring procurement to vendors for research and development related property and services totaling $6,448,341 in expenditures during fiscal years 2023 and 2024.The University of North Dakota did not properly procure two items tested with $115,258 spent during the audit period. Where sampling was performed, the audit used a non-statistical sampling method. IDENTIFICATION AS A REPEAT FINDING Not a repeat finding. RECOMMENDATION We recommend that the University of North Dakota properly procure property and services in compliance with federal and state regulations and North Dakota University System procurement requirements. UNIVERSITY SYSTEM RESPONSE The University of North Dakota agrees with the finding. See “Management’s Response and Corrective Action” section of this report.

Corrective Action Plan

University System Response/Corrective Action Plan Regarding the finding that no documentation was provided to ensure the proper procurement was completed for the purchase of a software license for $116,431. The University of North Dakota agrees, the software license was signed by an individual without authority. The individual responsible is no longer in a departmental administrative position at the University of North Dakota. The University of North Dakota has implemented mandatory campus-wide Procurement training for all users with security roles in our procurement system, effective December 2024. Regarding the finding that two pieces of equipment were purchased totaling $100,440 and formal bidding was not competed. The University of North Dakota agrees; due to an error in completing the public notice posting, the relevant state bidders list was not notified of the procurement opportunity. The University of North Dakota notes that three bidders were contacted (simplified acquisition) but agree this does not meet the formal bidding requirements. The procurement officer responsible for the error has been retrained. The University of North Dakota also understands that the state's new public notice system, which should go live in May 2025, is anticipated to require/mandate the selection of a bidders for all future public notices. Contact Person: Tom Scrivener, CPO Anticipated Completion Date: Completed

About Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →
2024-024
Equipment & Real Property
Condition

CONDITION The University of North Dakota has federally funded equipment that is not being properly identified with the corresponding major equipment asset tags on the asset. We tested a total of 21 capital assets and 10 of those were at the University of North Dakota where we found 5 assets without any major equipment identification tags on them for an error rate of 50%. CRITERIA 2 CFR section 200.313(d)(3) states in part that a control system must be in place to ensure safeguards for preventing property loss, damage, or theft. 2 CFR section 200.313(b) states in part that a State must use, manage and dispose of equipment acquired under a Federal award in accordance with State laws and procedures. The University of North Dakota Capital Asset policy states in part that the campus department is responsible for using correct chart field when acquiring all assets, tagging and tracking their major equipment, and completing annual inventory of all major equipment. CAUSE The departments and/or principal investigator (PI) purchasing the equipment did not correctly attach the major equipment tags to the asset as required by the University of North Dakota's Capital Asset policy. EFFECT There is noncompliance with federal rules and regulations as well as the University of North Dakota's Capital Asset policy, thus increasing the risk that federally funded equipment is not properly identified. CONTEXT For the audit period, the Research and Development Cluster had 207 equipment asset additions ($9,958,360). All the issues noted originated from one single department at the University of North Dakota. The insufficient tagging of capital asset deviations seems to be an isolated incident contained to this department, which in total for our audit period had 16 new additions totaling $419,060. Where sampling was performed, the audit used a non-statistical sampling method. IDENTIFICATION AS A REPEAT FINDING Not a repeat finding. RECOMMENDATION We recommend that the University of North Dakota ensure federally funded equipment is properly tagged. UNIVERSITY SYSTEM RESPONSE The University of North Dakota agrees with the finding. See “Management’s Response and Corrective Action” section of this report.

Corrective Action Plan

University System Response/Corrective Action Plan Agree. UND Asset Management adequately informs UND departments that the department is required to secure the tag to the asset. The requirement is also clearly listed in UND’s Capital Asset policy. UND Asset Management will work closely with departments to stress that they are required to secure tags to all major equipment assets. Contact Person: Sharon Loiland, Controller Anticipated Completion Date: March 31, 2025

About Equipment and Real Property Management →

FY 2022-06-30

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on March 29, 2023. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by September 29, 2023, which was (1056 days ago).

What is a management decision? →
2022-001
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability
QUESTIONED COSTS
Condition

?See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table? CONDITION The Department of Commerce issued eight duplicate grant payments totaling $174,422.48. Since we reviewed the entire population for potential duplicate payments, this amount is considered the total known questioned costs. However, two of the payments, totaling, $64,164.66 are still outstanding and Department is working with other state agencies to stop the payments from clearing. CRITERIA Per the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act, Title VI, Sec. 601 (d), payments from the Fund may only be used to cover costs that: 1. are necessary expenditures incurred due to the public health emergency with respect to the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID?19); 2. were not accounted for in the budget most recently approved as of March 27, 2020 (the date of enactment of the CARES Act) for the State or government; and 3. were incurred during the period that begins on March 1, 2020, and ends on December 31, 2021. Duplicate payments are neither necessary nor reasonable. Federal regulation, 2 CFR 200.303, requires non-Federal entities to establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. CAUSE Internal controls did not prevent these payments from being issued. EFFECT The Department of Commerce is not in compliance with Federal regulations as the duplicate payments were not an allowable use of Federal funds. CONTEXT The Department of Commerce utilized Coronavirus Relief Funds to provide approximately $81.7 million of net grants beginning July 1, 2020, and ending December 31, 2021. We identified eight duplicate grant payments totaling $174,422.48 out of $82,387,566 (6,139 payments) processed as one-time payments in the state's Peoplesoft system general ledger. Where sampling was performed, the audit used a non-statistical sampling method. IDENTIFICATION AS A REPEAT FINDING Not a repeat finding. RECOMMENDATION We recommend the Department of Commerce enhance internal controls to ensure duplicate payments are not made to recipients of Federal funds. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE RESPONSE The Department of Commerce agrees with this finding. See ?Management?s Response and Corrective Action? section of this report.

Corrective Action Plan

Department of Commerce Finding: 2022-001 Department of Commerce Response/Corrective Action Plan: The Department of Commerce agrees with this finding. These grants were conducted outside of our normal scope of operations and new grant processes had to be designed and implemented to manage this grant programmatically and fiscally. These grant payments were paid by a batch file process through the Office of Management and Budget and not fiscally managed by the agency?s fiscal department. The agency does not intend to manage grant processes programmatically or fiscally with these processes again. Of the eight duplicate grant payments identified two of the payments were voided, two payments have been returned to the department and turned back to the Office of Management and Budget, and the remaining payments the department has either been in contact with the beneficiary on returning the funds or the beneficiaries have been turned over to the Attorney General?s Office for further follow-up. The department will turn over the remainder of the beneficiaries to the Attorney?s General?s Office if payment is not made timely. Contact Person Shawn Kessel, COO/Deputy Commissioner Anticipated Completion Date There is no anticipated completion date for enhancing our internal controls to ensure duplicated payments are not made to the recipients of federal funds due to the fact the agency does not intend to manage a grant within our department programmatically or fiscally with these processes again.

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →
2022-002
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability
QUESTIONED COSTS
Condition

?See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table? CONDITION The 67th Legislative Assembly in 2021 Session Law, Senate Bill 2018, Section 8, appropriated $434,568 from the Coronavirus Relief Fund to the Department of Commerce for the tourism transportation improvement grant program for a grant to be provided to an organization dedicated to preserving and promoting a historic, tourism destination North Dakota city. We reviewed supporting documentation that showed the organization used the grant to defray the costs of adding a high-capacity elevator at an amphitheater. Such a capital improvement project is not considered a necessary expenditure incurred due to the COVID-19 public health emergency. In addition, the Department was unable to provide documentation the organization was impacted by the public health emergency and eligible for the CRF funds. This $434,568 grant is considered the total known questioned costs. This error was considered an isolated instance and was not projected to the sampled population. CRITERIA Per the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act, Title VI, Sec. 601 (d), payments from the Fund may only be used to cover costs that: 1. are necessary expenditures incurred due to the public health emergency with respect to the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID?19); 2. were not accounted for in the budget most recently approved as of March 27, 2020 (the date of enactment of the CARES Act) for the State or government; and 3. were incurred during the period that begins on March 1, 2020, and ends on December 31, 2021. The Federal Register dated January 15, 2021 (Vol. 86, No.10), states that if capital improvement projects are not necessary expenditures incurred due to the COVID-19 public health emergency, then Fund payments may not be used for such projects. However, payment for expenses associated with the provision of economic support in connection with the COVID-19 public health emergency, such as expenditures related to the provision of grants to small businesses to reimburse the costs of business interruption caused by required closures, would be allowable. There was no documentation supporting any costs of business interruption. In addition, the Federal Register states the prime recipient is responsible for determining the level and detail of documentation needed from the subrecipient of small business assistance to satisfy the requirements of section 601 (d) of the Social Security Act, however, there would need to be some proof that the small business was impacted by the public health emergency and was thus eligible for the CRF funds. Federal regulation, 2 CFR 200.303, requires non-Federal entities to establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. The "Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government" published by the United States Government Accountability Office states that management obtains relevant data from reliable internal and external sources in a timely manner based on the identified information requirements. (GAO-14-704G para.13.04). CAUSE While the Department of Commerce complied with legislative intent by providing a grant to an organization dedicated to preserving and promoting a historic, tourism destination North Dakota city, the Department did not review available guidelines published by the U.S. Treasury Department for allowable costs under the Coronavirus Relief Fund. EFFECT The Department of Commerce is not in compliance with Federal regulations. The funded capital improvement project was not a necessary expenditure incurred due to the COVID-19 public health emergency. CONTEXT The Department of Commerce utilized Coronavirus Relief Funds to provide approximately $81.7 million in grants beginning July 1, 2020, and ending December 31, 2021. This $434,568 grant was the only grant identified at this location earmarked to a specific organization by the ND Legislative Assembly. The Department of Commerce processed payments through the state's accounting system (Peoplesoft) accounts payable and general ledger payment methods. The error was identified within the accounts payable payment population of $9,274,447 (77 payments) where individually significant payments totaled $4,295,314 (2 payments) and sampled payments totaled $4,973,554 (57 payments). The error was not projected within the sampled payments. Where sampling was performed, the audit used a non-statistical sampling method. IDENTIFICATION AS A REPEAT FINDING Not a repeat finding. RECOMMENDATION We recommend the Department of Commerce: A) Review available guidelines published by the U.S. Treasury Department for allowable costs under the Coronavirus Relief Fund, B) Obtain some proof that the organization was impacted by the public health emergency, and C) Request support from the organization for allowable expenditures incurred during the period beginning March 1, 2020, and ending on December 31, 2021, to offset the questioned costs; OR D) Recoup the money from the organization and refund the Department of the Treasury. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE RESPONSE The Department of Commerce utilized the funds made available to it by the 67th Legislative Assembly to accomplish the intent of said legislative body. See ?Management?s Response and Corrective Action? section of this report.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding: 2022-002 Department of Commerce Response/Corrective Action Plan: The Department of Commerce agrees with this finding. The Department of Commerce utilized the funds made available to it by the 67th Legislative Assembly to accomplish the intent of said legislative body. The Agency is working with the current legislative body and the North Dakota Office of Management and Budget to resolve this finding. Contact Person: Shawn Kessel, COO/Deputy Commissioner Anticipated Completion Date: On or before July 1, 2023

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →
2022-003
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability
QUESTIONED COSTS
Condition

?See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table? CONDITION The Department of Commerce awarded a $4,879.94 grant to an applicant based on the estimated costs listed in the grant application. The Department subsequently requested proof of payment from the applicant and the applicant did not respond. As a result, the Department has requested a full refund and turned the matter over to the ND Attorney General's Office for collection. The amount of the grant award is considered the total known questioned costs. This error, projected to the entire population, results in an additional possible error of $690,025.74. CRITERIA Per the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act, Title VI, Sec. 601 (d), payments from the Fund may only be used to cover costs that: 1. are necessary expenditures incurred due to the public health emergency with respect to the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID?19); 2. were not accounted for in the budget most recently approved as of March 27, 2020 (the date of enactment of the CARES Act) for the State or government; and 3. were incurred during the period that begins on March 1, 2020, and ends on December 31, 2021. In addition, the Federal Register dated January 15, 2021, indicates the direct recipient of payments from the Fund is ultimately responsible for subrecipient compliance on the use of payments from the Fund. CAUSE The Department of Commerce did perform application reviews before awarding funding and performed audits of randomly selected businesses during the program period. However, the beneficiary has not cooperated with the Department's requests. EFFECT The Department of Commerce is not in compliance with Federal regulations. Without proper support, there is no way to determine if the beneficiary used the payment from the Fund on necessary expenditures incurred due to the public health emergency with respect to COVID-19. CONTEXT The Department of Commerce utilized Coronavirus Relief Funds to provide approximately $81.7 million in grants beginning July 1, 2020, and ending December 31, 2021. Where sampling was performed, the audit used a non-statistical sampling method. In a non-statistical sample of 40 of the 6,139 grant payments processed as one-time payments in the state's Peoplesoft general ledger, we identified one business that was not cooperative with the Department's requests for additional support and/or refund. Eight other beneficiaries selected for testing refunded the Department upon request. IDENTIFICATION AS A REPEAT FINDING Not a repeat finding. RECOMMENDATION We recommend the Department of Commerce continue its efforts to: A) Obtain support from the beneficiary for allowable expenditures under the Fund; or B) Recoup the grant award from the beneficiary and refund the U.S. Department of the Treasury. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE RESPONSE The Department of Commerce agrees with this finding. See ?Management?s Response and Corrective Action? section of this report.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding: 2022-003 Department of Commerce Response/Corrective Action Plan: The Department of Commerce agrees with this finding. The agency has attempted several times to obtain allowable expenditures under the fund with no cooperation from the beneficiary. The beneficiary was turned over to the North Dakota Attorney General Office on August 13, 2020, to recoup the grant award and refund the U.S. Department of the Treasury. Contact Person: Shawn Kessel, COO/Deputy Commissioner Anticipated Completion Date: December 2024 is the anticipated completion date for this finding as the beneficiary has been turned over to the North Dakota Attorney General's Office to recoup the grant award.

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →
2022-004
Subrecipient Monitoring
Condition

?See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table? CONDITION Department of Commerce did not complete a risk assessment for subawards to Community Action Agencies and, therefore, risk assessments are not being used to determine the nature and extent of subrecipient monitoring. CRITERIA Pass-through entities are required (45 CFR 75.352(b)) to evaluate each subrecipients risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring described in paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section, which may include consideration of such factors as: (1) The subrecipients prior experience with the same or similar subawards; (2) The results of previous audits including whether or not the subrecipient receives a Single Audit in accordance with subpart F, and the extent to which the same or similar subaward has been audited as a major program; (3) Whether the subrecipient has new personnel or new or substantially changed systems; and (4) The extent and results of HHS awarding agency monitoring (e.g., if the subrecipient also receives Federal awards directly from an HHS awarding agency). 45 CFR 75.303 states that the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. CAUSE The Department of Commerce did not complete risk assessments during the audit period due to COVID-19 as the Department was unable to go on-site to assess the risk at each Community Action Agency. EFFECT Department of Commerce may be performing insufficient subrecipient monitoring of high-risk subrecipients. CONTEXT Payments to the 7 Community Action Agencies that received payment as subrecipients under the LIHEAP program totaled $12,171,758 during fiscal years 2021 and 2022. The Department of Commerce did not complete risk assessments during the audit period due to COVID-19 as the Department was unable to go on-site an assess the risk at each Community Action Agency. The Department did continue to monitor the Community Action Agencies through monitoring and ensuring that the Community Action Agencies received their Federal Single Audits. Where sampling was performed, the audit used a non-statistical sampling method. IDENTIFICATION AS A REPEAT FINDING Not a repeat finding. RECOMMENDATION We recommend the Department of Commerce ensure subrecipient risk assessments are completed and used to determine the nature and extent of subrecipient monitoring. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE RESPONSE The Department of Commerce agrees with this finding. See ?Management?s Response and Corrective Action? section of this report.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding: 2022-004 Department of Commerce Response/Corrective Action Plan: The Department of Commerce agrees with this finding. Risk assessments were not completed during the audit period because we were unable to go on site to assess the risk at each Community Action Agency due to the global pandemic and COVID-19 restrictions. The Department of Commerce is in the process of implementing this recommendation as we are now able to perform onsite monitoring to assess the risk at each Community Action Agency due to COVID-19 restrictions having subsequently been lifted. Contact Person: Alison Widmer, Director of Administrative Services Anticipated Completion Date: December 31, 2022

About Subrecipient Monitoring →
2022-005
Subrecipient Monitoring
MATERIAL WEAKNESS
Condition

?See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table? CONDITION The Department of Health did not ensure all required grant award information for Coronavirus Relief Funds (CRF) was provided to subrecipients. In addition, the Department's internal controls were insufficient to ensure that subrecipients received communication regarding the necessary items. Required information not communicated included: ? Subrecipient's unique entity identifier, ? Federal Award Identification Number, ? Total amount of Federal funds obligated to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity including the current financial obligation, ? Name of awarding agency, ? Assistance Listing Number; and, ? Indirect cost rate for Federal award including if the de minimis rate is charged. CRITERIA Federal regulation, 2 CFR 200.332(a), requires pass-through entities to communicate specific required information to subrecipients. Federal regulation, 2 CFR 200.303, requires non-Federal entities, in part, to establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. CAUSE The Department of Health did not utilize its traditional grant template agreement to extend CRF dollars to ambulance, fire, school districts, and hospitals. Instead, the Department used a CARES Act Coronavirus Relief Fund Eligibility Certification form which did not contain all required items. EFFECT These required communications are intended to help subrecipients meet all their reporting requirements and to meet all award terms. Subrecipients subject to Single Audits also need this information for their audits. CONTEXT The Department of Health utilized its traditional grant template agreement for $31.7 million in grants provided to 28 local public health units which included the best information available to describe the Federal award and subaward. However, the Department did not utilize its traditional grant template agreement to extend up to $29.8 million of CRF dollars to 121 other entities, including ambulance, fire, and school districts and hospitals. Where sampling was performed, the audit used a non-statistical sampling method. IDENTIFICATION AS A REPEAT FINDING Not a repeat finding. RECOMMENDATION We recommend the Department of Health: A) Communicate all required information of 2 CFR 200.332(a) to subrecipients. B) Develop procedures to ensure that all Coronavirus Relief Fund award information is communicated to subrecipients. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH RESPONSE The Public Health Division of the Department of Health and Human Services (formerly Department of Health) agrees with the recommendation. See ?Management?s Response and Corrective Action? section of this report.

Corrective Action Plan

Department of Health Finding: 2022-005 Department of Health Response/Corrective Action Plan: The Public Health Division of the Department of Health and Human Services (formerly Department of Health) agrees with the recommendation. Procedures and additional internal controls have been added to ensure all required award information is communicated to subrecipients, to the extent this information is available. Contact Person Karol Riedman, Assistant CFO Anticipated Completion Date Completed

About Subrecipient Monitoring →
2022-006
Subrecipient Monitoring
Condition

?See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table? CONDITION The Department of Health did not evaluate each subrecipient's risk of noncompliance. CRITERIA Federal regulation, 2 CFR 200.303, requires non-Federal entities, in part, to establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Per 2 CFR 200.332, all pass-through entities must evaluate each subrecipient?s risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring. All pass-through entities must monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward, and that subaward performance goals are achieved. Per 2 CFR 200.332(d)(2), pass through entities are required to ensure that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity detected through audits, on-site reviews, and written confirmation from the subrecipient, highlighting the status of actions planned or taken to address Single Audit findings related to the particular subaward. CAUSE The Department of Health primarily relied on risk assessments previously conducted for entities that had entered into other traditional grant agreements with the agency. Risk assessments were not conducted on all entities that only received CRF dollars and had not entered into other traditional grant agreements. The Department of Health indicated that prior to COVID-19, all subrecipients were subjected to sampling for a desk review. However, during COVID-19, the Department focused monitoring efforts on the 28 local public health units and pulled one random month to review expenditures being charged. EFFECT Monitoring activities conducted during our audit period were not determined based on subrecipient risk of noncompliance. CONTEXT The Department of Health provided $61.5M of CRF dollars to 149 subrecipients as follows: ? $31.7M to 28 local public health units ? $25M to 7 hospitals and related organizations ? $4.8M to 114 other entities, primarily ambulance districts We tested 15 of the 149 subrecipients (13 randomly selected and 2 individually significant items). Based on our testing and information provided by the Department of Health, we identified the following: ? Department of Health performed adequate during the award monitoring on 6 of the 15 subrecipients selected. ? Department of Health monitored 4 subrecipients not required to have a Single Audit. Six subrecipients selected had Single Audits while the remaining five subrecipients, which received less than $100,000 in CRF funding, were not monitored nor had a Single Audit. ? Department of Health did not conduct risk assessments on 4 of the 15 subrecipients selected, mostly ambulance districts that only received CRF dollars. The Department of Health acknowledged subjecting the 28 local public health units to subrecipient monitoring sampling. The Department tested $919,816 out of $61,521,414 of CRF payments to subrecipients or 1.5%. In addition, we noted the Department had assigned a risk level to the local public health units and hospitals selected for testing, as well as 53 ambulance districts. Lastly, the subrecipients (local public health units, hospitals, and ambulance districts) were known to be impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic, which could make such entities low risk for noncompliance. Where sampling was performed, the audit used a non-statistical sampling method. IDENTIFICATION AS A REPEAT FINDING Not a repeat finding. RECOMMENDATION We recommend the Department of Health conduct during-the-award monitoring activities as required for pass-through entities in accordance with 2 CFR 200.332. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH RESPONSE The Public Health Division of the Department of Health and Human Services (formerly Department of Health) agrees with the recommendation. See ?Management?s Response and Corrective Action? section of this report.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding: 2022-006 Department of Health Response/Corrective Action Plan: The Public Health Division of the Department of Health and Human Services (formerly Department of Health) agrees with the recommendation. Procedures will be developed in cooperation with the integrated Department of Health and Human Services audit division to designate responsibility and processes for subrecipient monitoring activities during the award period. Contact Person: Karol Riedman, Assistant CFO and Amanda Westlake, Audit Manager Anticipated Completion Date: June 30, 2023

About Subrecipient Monitoring →
2022-007
Subrecipient Monitoring
Condition

?See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table? CONDITION The Health Department did not receive audit reports for all subrecipients that received greater than $750,000 or verify that all subrecipients receiving less than $750,000 from the Health Department were not subject to requirements under 2 CFR 200 Subpart F. One subrecipient received over $980,000 and the Health Department did not receive an audit report from this entity. There were 6 additional subrecipients that received less than $750,000 but there were no verifications to ensure additional Federal funds weren't received from another source. Any of these entities that received greater than $750,000 in Federal funds from all sources would be required to receive an audit under 2 CFR 200 Subpart F. CRITERIA 2 CFR 200.332(f) states that a pass-through entity must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by 2 CFR 200 Subpart F. CAUSE The tracking spreadsheet for subrecipient audit reports is not being used to verify that all subrecipients received an audit or a certification that an audit is not required. EFFECT The Health Department is not meeting the requirements of a pass through entity required by 2 CFR 200 Subpart F. CONTEXT There were 27 subrecipients that received Federal funds from the Health Department which were subject to monitoring during our audit period. Where sampling was performed, the audit used a non-statistical sampling method. IDENTIFICATION AS A REPEAT FINDING Not a repeat finding. RECOMMENDATION We recommend the Health Department ensure all subrecipients obtain audits or a certification that an audit is not required in accordance with 2 CFR 200 Subpart F. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH RESPONSE The Public Health Division of the Department of Health and Human Services (formerly the Department of Health) agrees with this recommendation. See ?Management?s Response and Corrective Action? section of this report.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding: 2022-007 Department of Health Response/Corrective Action Plan: The Public Health Division of the Department of Health and Human Services (formerly the Department of Health) agrees with this recommendation. Procedures will be implemented to ensure all subrecipients obtain audits or a certification that an audit is not required in accordance with 2 CFR 200 Subpart F. Contact Person: Karol Riedman, Assistant CFO Anticipated Completion Date: June 30, 2023

About Subrecipient Monitoring →
2022-008
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability
REPEATQUESTIONED COSTS
Condition

?See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table? CONDITION Medicaid providers did not submit proper documentation to support the services billed in 12 of 456 claims tested by the auditors. This resulted in improper payments of $6,622. When projected against the entire population, the additional likely Federal questioned costs total $17,735,959. CRITERIA 45 CFR 75.303 states that the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. 42 CFR 431.960 (c) (1) states a medical review error is an error resulting in an overpayment or underpayment that is determined from a review of the provider's medical record or other documentation supporting the service(s) claimed, Code of Federal Regulations that are applicable to conditions of payment, the State's written policies, and a comparison between the documentation and written policies and the information presented on the claim resulting in Federal and/or State improper payments. 42 CFR 431.960 (c) (3) states medical review errors include, but are not limited to, the following: (i) Lack of documentation, (ii) Insufficient documentation, and (iii) procedure coding errors. CAUSE Medicaid providers did not submit proper documentation to support Medicaid claims. EFFECT Unallowable or inaccurate payments were made to providers who later did not submit proper documentation when selected for audit. CONTEXT There were 10,698,524 Medicaid claims that occurred during our audit period of July 1, 2020, through June 30, 2022. The Federal Medical Assistance Percentages were used to calculate the Federal portion of the projected likely questioned costs. Where sampling was performed, the audit used a non-statistical sampling method. The Department provided the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Notification of Improper Payment Rates for North Dakota dated 11/15/22. The target rate for fee-for-service payment errors was 14.88% with an estimated rate of 3.04% based on 387 sampled claims identified through the Payment Error Rate Measurement Program (PERM). The error rate of the claims audited by the ND State Auditor?s Office is 2.63% which is below this threshold. IDENTIFICATION AS A REPEAT FINDING Finding 2020-005 was reported in the immediate prior year. The prior audit finding was reported as implemented on the summary schedule of prior audit findings. This materially misrepresents the status of the finding. RECOMMENDATION We recommend the Department of Human Services develop a corrective action plan to address the errors identified in the audit and recover payments made on unsupported claims. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES RESPONSE The Department agrees to recover payments made on unsupported claims. See ?Management?s Response and Corrective Action? section of this report.

Corrective Action Plan

Department of Human Services Finding: 2022-008 Department of Human Services Response/Corrective Action Plan: The department agrees to recover payments made on unsupported claims. The department will recover payments made on unsupported claims. Contact Person: Corey Kjos, Enterprise Operations Manager Anticipated Completion Date: June 30, 2023

Prior Finding References

2020-005

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →
2022-009
Special Tests & Provisions
Condition

?See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table? CONDITION The Department of Human Services has not completed a risk analysis and security review of the Medicaid Management Information System (MMIS) since 2019. CRITERIA 45 CFR 95.621(f)(3) states that state agencies shall review the Automatic Data Processing (ADP) system security of installations involved in the administration of Health and Human Services (HHS) programs on a biennial basis. 45 CFR 95.621(f)(6) states that the state agency shall maintain reports of their biennial ADP system security reviews, together with pertinent supporting documentation, for HHS on-site review. 45 CFR 75.303 states that the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. CAUSE A risk analysis and security review was not completed in 2020 and 2021 due to resources being dedicated to the developing of new software. This new software will automate many of the processes surrounding the risk analysis and security review as well as user access reviews and will save personnel time. EFFECT The risk analysis has not been completed regularly and there is the possibility the security over different areas of the system can become compromised bringing into question the validity of the data contained within the system. CONTEXT There were $2,496,097,225 of Medicaid payments that were processed in the MMIS and eligibility systems during our audit period of July 1, 2020, through June 30, 2022. Where sampling was performed, the audit used a non-statistical sampling method. IDENTIFICATION AS A REPEAT FINDING Not a repeat finding. RECOMMENDATION We recommend the Department of Human Services complete a risk analysis and security review of MMIS biennially. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES RESPONSE The Department agrees with the recommendation. See ?Management?s Response and Corrective Action? section of this report.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding: 2022-009 Department of Human Services Response/Corrective Action Plan: The Department agrees with the recommendation. The department will work with NDIT to ensure they restart and maintain the risk analysis and security review for MMIS. Contact Person: Tory Brabandt, Medicaid Enterprise Director Anticipated Completion Date: December 31, 2023

About Special Tests and Provisions →
2022-010
Special Tests & Provisions
Condition

?See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table? CONDITION The medical loss ratio report for reporting calendar year 2020 did not contain the minimum Federal regulation required elements. DHS did not maintain the required attestation statement to address accuracy for reporting year 2020. As of March 2, 2023, the medical loss ratio report for reporting year 2021, which was due in November 2022, has not been finalized as outlined in the Sanford Health Plan contract. The contract required completion prior to 11 months following the applicable MLR reporting year or a mutually agreed upon alternative date. CRITERIA Effective January 1, 2020, Sanford Health Plan Contract states, prior to 11 months following the applicable MLR reporting year or a mutually agreed upon alternative date, STATE shall finalize the MLR (Medical Loss Ratio) reporting year with any balance due to STATE as required in paragraph (G) of this section within 60 days. 42 CFR 438.8 (n) MCOs, PIHPs, and PAHPs must attest to the accuracy of the calculation of the MLR in accordance with requirements of this section when submitting the report required under paragraph (k) of this section. 45 CFR 75.303 states that the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. CAUSE The attestation statement to address accuracy was not provided to the auditor. The Department indicated the statement was obtained by an employee no longer with the Department and it was not shared with other team members. The Medical Loss Ratio report for reporting year 2021 was not finalized as outlined in the Sanford Health Plan Contract, "Prior to 11 months following the applicable MLR reporting year or a mutually agreed upon alternative date, STATE shall finalize the MLR reporting year with any balance due to STATE as required in paragraph (G) of this section within 60 days". This was due to a large reconciliation taking longer than normal to complete. A mutually agreed upon alternative date was not determined due to research needing to be done on both sides, sometimes not knowing how long it would take. EFFECT Absent the inclusion of all required medical loss ratio information, the Department cannot demonstrate compliance with Federal regulations. CONTEXT During our audit period of July 1, 2020, through June 30, 2022, the Department of Human Services contracted with one MCO health plan that was subject to MLR Federal reporting requirements. Where sampling was performed, the audit used a non-statistical sampling method. IDENTIFICATION AS A REPEAT FINDING Not a repeat finding. RECOMMENDATION We recommend the Department of Human Services ensures the medical loss ratio report is finalized as outlined in the contract and all required documentation is properly maintained. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES RESPONSE The Department agrees with the finding. See ?Management?s Response and Corrective Action? section of this report.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding: 2022-010 Department of Human Services Response/Corrective Action Plan: The Department agrees with the finding. When the Department had to re-procure the Medicaid Expansion MCO contract for a January 1, 2022, start date, the contract was overhauled and made much more specific in terms of the MLR requirements, so we do not anticipate the same issues happening again. Below is contract language that addresses this finding. Appendix E, Article 1 10. Reporting requirements 1. MCO shall submit two reports to STATE that includes at least the following information for each MLR Reporting Year, one of which excludes the adjustments identified in (I) and (C)(3)(d) above: 1. Total incurred claims. 2. Expenditures on quality improving activities. 3. Expenditures related to activities compliant with program integrity requirements (42 C.F.R. ?438.608(a)(1) through (5), (7), (8) and (b)). 4. Non-claims costs. 5. Premium revenue. 6. Taxes, licensing, and regulatory fees. 7. Methodology(ies) for allocation of expenditures. 8. Any credibility adjustment applied. 9. The calculated MLR. 10. Any remittance owed to STATE, if applicable. 11. A comparison of the information reported in this paragraph with the audited financial report required under 42 C.F.R. ?438.3(m). 12. A description of the aggregation method used under paragraph (F) of this article. 13. The number of Member Months. 2. MCO must require any third-party vendor providing claims adjudication activities to provide all underlying data associated with MLR reporting to that MCO within 180 days of the end of the MLR Reporting Year or within 30 days of being requested by MCO whichever comes sooner, regardless of current contractual limitations, to calculate and validate the accuracy of MLR reporting. 3. Prior to ten (10) months following the applicable MLR Reporting Year, MCO must submit the report required in paragraph (I)(1) of this article based on data including eight (8) months of claims run out. 4. MCO shall attest to the accuracy of the calculation of the MLR in accordance with requirements of this article when submitting the report required under this paragraph. 2. Prior to eleven (11) months following the applicable MLR Reporting Year or a mutually agreed upon alternative date, STATE shall finalize the MLR Reporting Year with any balance due to STATE as required in paragraph (H) of this article within sixty (60) days. Contact Person: Jared Ferguson, Medicaid Expansion Administrator Anticipated Completion Date: Already Completed

About Special Tests and Provisions →
2022-011
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability
Condition

?See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table? CONDITION The Department of Human Services did not complete an access review of the Medicaid Management Information System (MMIS) fee schedule for 2020 or 2021. The Department also did not complete a security review of all major Medicaid information systems for 2021 or 2022. CRITERIA Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government requires management designs other control activities to promptly update access rights when employees change job functions or leave the entity. Management also designs control activities for access rights when different information technology elements are connected to each other. (GAO-14-704G para 11.14). 45 CFR 75.303 states that the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. CAUSE The MMIS fee schedule access review was not completed in 2020 and 2021 and review of access rights for the major Medicaid information systems was not completed in 2021 and 2022 due to resources being dedicated to the developing of new software. The new software being developed may automate many of the processes surrounding the risk analysis and security review as well as user access reviews. EFFECT There is a risk that employees whose job duties have changed still have access to confidential information. CONTEXT There were $2,496,097,225 of Medicaid payments that were processed in the MMIS and eligibility systems during our audit period of July 1, 2020, through June 30, 2022. Where sampling was performed, the audit used a non-statistical sampling method. IDENTIFICATION AS A REPEAT FINDING Not a repeat finding. RECOMMENDATION We recommend the Department of Human Services review access rights to the Medicaid Management Information System (MMIS) fee schedule and all major Medicaid information systems on a regular basis. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES RESPONSE The Department agrees with the recommendations. See ?Management?s Response and Corrective Action? section of this report.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding: 2022-011 Department of Human Services Response/Corrective Action Plan: The Department agrees with the recommendation. The department will work with NDIT to ensure they restart and maintain the access and security reviews. Contact Person: Tory Brabandt, Medicaid Enterprise Director Anticipated Completion Date: June 30, 2023

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →
2022-012
Special Tests & Provisions
REPEAT
Condition

?See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table? CONDITION The Department of Human Services is not properly monitoring corrective orders issued to child care providers and performing re-inspections of identified deficiencies within specified time frames. 5 of 586 corrective orders issued during our audit period did not identify a date the orders were corrected. 187 of 586 (32%) corrective orders were not re-inspected within the 24-hour, 20-day, or 60-day time frame allowed for correction. 8 of 586 (1%) correction orders indicated correction before the violation date which potentially could mean inaccurate dates were being tracked. CRITERIA North Dakota Century Code (NDCC) section 50-11.1-07.2 requires that the Department or the Department's authorized agency issue a correction order whenever it is determined upon inspection that a program or premises is not in compliance with this chapter or rules adopted under this chapter. NDCC section 50-11.1-07.3 requires the Department or the Department's authorized agency shall re-inspect an early childhood program issued a correction order under NDCC section 50-11.1-07.2, at the end of the period allowed for correction. 45 CFR 98.41 requires that lead agencies must certify that procedures are in effect to ensure that providers serving children who receive subsidies comply with all applicable health and safety requirements. 45 CFR 75.303 states that the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. CAUSE The Department's procedures for monitoring the resolution of corrective orders is ineffective. Due to employee turnover and the lack of guidance, corrective orders and dates are not consistently documented on the tracking sheet. EFFECT Child care providers are operating without proper follow-up of corrective orders potentially jeopardizing the health and safety of children. CONTEXT During fiscal years 2021 and 2022, there were 1,170 licensed providers in North Dakota receiving payments from the Child Care Assistance program. The following list is the number of corrective orders issued by calendar year: 2022 - 152 (through July) 2021 - 291 2020 - 143 (July through December) Where sampling was performed, the audit used a non-statistical sampling method. IDENTIFICATION AS A REPEAT FINDING Finding 2020-011 was reported in the immediate prior year. Findings 2018-013 and 2016-026 were made in previous years. RECOMMENDATION We recommend the Department of Human Service improve procedures to ensure child care correction orders are resolved before the end of each allowed correction period with accurate tracking of dates. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES RESPONSE The Department of Health and Human Service agrees with this recommendation. See ?Management?s Response and Corrective Action? section of this report.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding: 2022-012 Department of Human Services Response/Corrective Action Plan: The Department of Health and Human Service agrees with this recommendation. The Department has been working with a developer to create a Child Care Licensing Data System to replace a paper process and multiple spreadsheets. The system allows each licensing specialist to see their workflow when they log into the system. It also notifies when a reinspection is needed and will escalate the notice if the reinspection is not done timely. Contact Person: Carmen Traeholt, Child Care Licensing Administrator Anticipated Completion Date: The data system launched in December 2022.

Prior Finding References

2020-011

About Special Tests and Provisions →
2022-013
Special Tests & Provisions
REPEAT
Condition

?See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table? CONDITION The Department of Human Services is not performing annual unannounced inspections of child care providers in operation. An annual unannounced inspection was not completed on 9 of 71 providers that were tested. CRITERIA 45 CFR 98.42(b)(2)(B) requires that not less than annually, an unannounced inspection for compliance with all child care licensing standards, which shall include an inspection for compliance with health and safety and fire standards, shall be completed. Department policy 620-01-116 states, the authorized agent is required to perform an unannounced review at least annually for each licensed or self-declared child care provider. 45 CFR 75.303 states that the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. CAUSE The Department's procedures for ensuring unannounced visits are performed annually is ineffective. EFFECT Child care providers are operating child care facilities without proper monitoring of whether health and safety conditions have been met. CONTEXT During fiscal years 2021 and 2022 there were 1,871 providers from the Child Care Assistance program. The 12.7% error rate applied to the population would result in an estimated 237 providers not receiving unannounced visits. Errors were found within group, center, and self-declared providers. Where sampling was performed, the audit used a non-statistical sampling method. IDENTIFICATION AS A REPEAT FINDING Finding 2020-015 was reported in the immediate prior year. Findings 2018-017 and 2016-027 were made in previous years. RECOMMENDATION We recommend the Department of Human Services develop corrective action and perform annual unannounced inspections of child care providers in operation in accordance with 45 CFR 98.42(b)(2)(B) and Department policy. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES RESPONSE The Department agrees with the recommendation. See ?Management?s Response and Corrective Action? section of this report.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding: 2022-013 Department of Human Services Response/Corrective Action Plan: The Department agrees with the recommendation. The Child Care Licensing System (CCL) went live Dec. 2022, CCL will add upcoming unannounced visits to Licensing Specialist?s work que. Licensing Supervisors and the Licensing Administrator will run a monthly report to assure unannounced visits are being completed by the Licensing Specialists. Contact Person: Carmen Traeholt, Child Care Licensing Administrator Anticipated Completion Date: Completed January 2023

Prior Finding References

2020-015

About Special Tests and Provisions →
2022-014
Reporting
Condition

?See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table? CONDITION The Department of Human Services (DHS) is incorrectly identifying the ND Department of Commerce (Commerce) as a subrecipient for reporting purposes. DHS entered into $8,900,000 worth of subcontracts for the audit period 7/1/20-6/30/22. $8,000,000 was contracted with the Department of Commerce (4 contracts), who then subawarded 27 contracts worth $7,890,001 to 7 different Community Action Agencies. The other $900,000 was correctly subawarded by DHS through 2 contracts to Community Options for outreach services. DHS entered into contracts with Commerce, which Commerce then subawarded to Community Action Agencies for Weatherization and Emergency Furnace programs under the Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP). DHS reported the 4 contracts with Commerce for FFATA. All 27 contracts with the Community Action Agencies by Commerce were not correctly identified as subawards for FFATA reporting. Because of this, the FFATA reporting does not accurately show the subawards of the state. In addition, by incorrectly reporting the Department of Commerce as a subrecipient, DHS overstated the total amount subawarded by $109,999 as the Department of Commerce used this amount for administrative expenses. ?See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table? CRITERIA Non-federal entities are required to submit FFATA reporting according to 45 CFR 75.300(b). Per Part 3 of the Compliance Supplement, Subrecipient Monitoring section, "Transfers of Federal awards to another component of the same auditee under 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart F, do not constitute a subrecipient or contractor relationship". The ND Department of Commerce, receiving Federal funds from the ND Department of Human Services to subaward to the Community Action Agencies, is a pass-through entity according to the following definitions. ? 45 CFR 75.2 Pass-through Entity means a non-Federal entity that provides a subaward to a subrecipient to carry out part of a Federal program. ? 45 CFR 75.2 Subrecipient means an entity, usually but not limited to non-Federal entities, that receives a subaward from a pass-through entity to carry out part of a Federal award; but does not include an individual that is a beneficiary of such award. A subrecipient may also be a recipient of other Federal awards directly from a Federal awarding agency. ? 45 CFR 75.2 Subaward means an award provided by a pass-through entity to a subrecipient for the subrecipient to carry out part of a Federal award received by the pass-through entity. It does not include payments to a contractor or payments to an individual that is a beneficiary of a Federal program. A subaward may be provided through any form of legal agreement, including an agreement that the pass-through entity considers a contract. 45 CFR 75.303 states that the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. CAUSE DHS did not properly distinguish another state agency (Commerce) as a pass-through entity in subrecipient tracking methods and failed to identify the subawards to Community Action Agencies. EFFECT DHS incorrectly identified funds passed through to Commerce as a subrecipient relationship and reported subawards paid to Commerce in FFATA reporting. Subawards that the ND has with Community Action Agencies were not reported in the Federal Funds Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) reporting. In doing so, DHS and Commerce did not report 27 subawards to Community Action Agencies. Since DHS did report subaward amounts with Commerce, the net error amount is $109,999 for the audit period 7/1/20 - 6/30/22. CONTEXT The North Dakota Department of Human Services administers the LIHEAP program and contracts with the Department of Commerce to administer the Weatherization and Emergency Furnace programs under the LIHEAP program. Commerce entered into 27 contracts between 7 Community Action Agencies for a total amount of $7,890,001 during the audit period 7/1/20-6/30/22. The Community Action Agencies were not identified as the recipients of the subawards for LIHEAP. This resulted in a qualitative reporting error and a net reporting amount error of $109,999. Where sampling was performed, the audit used a non-statistical sampling method. IDENTIFICATION AS A REPEAT FINDING Not a repeat finding. RECOMMENDATION We recommend the Department of Human Services coordinate with the Department of Commerce to properly report subawards of the state under the LIHEAP program for FFATA reporting. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES RESPONSE The Department agrees with the recommendation. See ?Management?s Response and Corrective Action? section of this report.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding: 2022-014 Department of Human Services Response/Corrective Action Plan: The Department agrees with the recommendation. DHS acknowledges that the Department of Commerce subawards their pass-through Federal LiHeap funds out to multiple Community Action Agencies and therefore, should be reported as subawards in the Federal Funds Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) reporting. Going forward, the Department will coordinate with the Department of Commerce to ensure proper reporting of these subawards. Contact Person: Rachel Iverson Schafer Director of Program Administration Anticipated Completion Date: October 2023

About Reporting →
2022-015
Eligibility
QUESTIONED COSTS
Condition

?See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table? CONDITION We identified an individual receiving LIHEAP benefits when they were living at one of their parents' houses rent-free. There was no rental contract on file or adequate documentation to allow this individual to receive LIHEAP benefits. We identified a known error of $749.37. When projected against the population, the remaining likely projected error is $302,293.17. CRITERIA 45 CFR 75.303 states that the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. DHS LIHEAP policy 415-20-10-35, "Households that receive rent-free housing including fuel as a required condition of part of an employment agreement, or as a gift, or through legal action (separation/divorce), are NOT vulnerable to the rising cost of heat and are therefore not eligible for heating assistance from LIHEAP." CAUSE County eligibility workers did not obtain enough documentation to confirm that the case was in compliance with DHS LIHEAP policy 415-20-10-35. EFFECT Improper overpayment of LIHEAP benefits. CONTEXT During state fiscal years, approximately 189,548 payments, totaling $34 million, were processed through the Department of Human Services' Legacy and SPACES eligibility systems. From the SPACES system there were 88,917 payments totaling $15.5 million and from the LEGACY system there were 100,631 payments totaling $18.4 million. The State Auditor's office performed a test of 80 payments, 40 from LEGACY and 40 from SPACES. The SPACES sample of payments was stratified with 66,548 payments under $200 (13 tested); 21,606 payments from $200-$999 (tested 24); and 763 payments with amount over $1,000 (tested 3). The error was identified in eligibility testing of payment records from the SPACES system which were approximately $15.5 million, and projected within stratified payments individually less than $200 ($5.28 million, 66,548 payments). Where sampling was performed, the audit used a non-statistical sampling method. IDENTIFICATION AS A REPEAT FINDING Not a repeat finding. RECOMMENDATION We recommend the Department of Human Services ensure adequate rental documentation is on file and proper eligibility determinations of the Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP) are made. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES RESPONSE The Department agrees with the recommendation. See ?Management?s Response and Corrective Action? section of this report.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding: 2022-015 Department of Human Services Response/Corrective Action Plan: The Department agrees with the recommendation. The Department will ensure eligibility workers are properly trained to determine and verify eligibility for households that are NOT vulnerable as they are receiving rent-free housing that includes the cost of fuel (for heating). Contact Person: Rachel Iverson Schafer Director of Program Administration Anticipated Completion Date: Update policy for FY2024 heating season and include in the FY2024 training. Updated policy by October 1, 2023. Training to be completed by October 29, 2023.

About Eligibility →
2022-016
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability
QUESTIONED COSTS
Condition

?See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table? CONDITION The Department of Human Services (DHS) did not prevent duplicate LIHEAP benefit payments. Potential duplicate payments made during the audit period were identified by analyzing cases with combinations of the same case number (SPACES system) or Social Security Number (SSN) (Legacy system), Fuel Type, Benefit Month, Provider, and Amount. In addition, duplicate SSNs were analyzed to identify individuals in more than one case meaning that individuals would be counted in the number of persons in more than one household for calculating LIHEAP benefit payments. The duplicate payment test identified a known duplicate payments error of $1,415 and, projected to the population, a remaining likely questioned cost of $181,183. The duplicate SSN test identified a known overpayment of $528 and, projected to the population, a remaining likely questioned cost of $2,961. There was a 35% (7 of 20 tested) error rate in duplicate payments and a 90% (18 of 20 tested) error rate in duplicate SSNs. CRITERIA 45 CFR 75.303 states that the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. DHS policy 415-15-10-20 for verification of eligibility states verification of the applicant's statement of resources, or any other factor of eligibility and benefit determination, may be required whenever it is questionable in the judgment of the county social service board representative. If the required verification is refused, the application may be denied. In addition to the household income, eligibility and/or benefit determination factors include, but are not limited to identity, location and size of home, type of fuel, various dates, household composition, vulnerability, etc. If there is a court order or legal agreement form that indicates that both parents have 50% custody of their children, each parent can count the children in their household. CAUSE The DHS does not have proper procedures in place to detect and prevent duplicate or improper payments from being issued. Legacy and SPACES automatically calculate benefit payments. DHS is also able to make manual payments in addition to the calculated benefit payments. In addition, Case files lacked adequate documentation such as custody agreements and court orders at the time of eligibility determination for children in split custody arrangements. DHS does not have a policy to define 50% custody when a custody agreement or court order is not provided. EFFECT Overpayment of LIHEAP benefits. CONTEXT The LIHEAP program had approximately 189,548 benefit payments to individuals totaling $34 million for fiscal years 2021 and 2022. Out of those payments our office identified 12,689 potential duplicate payments totaling $1,437,329 and a separate 263 payments with duplicate SSNs indicating the same individual in multiple households/cases totaling $70,110. Where sampling was performed, the audit used a non-statistical sampling method. IDENTIFICATION AS A REPEAT FINDING Not a repeat finding. RECOMMENDATION We recommend the Department of Human Services ensure policies and procedures prevent duplicate payments from being applied to LIHEAP cases. We also recommend the Department of Human Services ensure required documentation is obtained for individuals appearing in multiple cases in accordance with state LIHEAP Policy. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES RESPONSE The Department agrees with the finding. See ?Management?s Response and Corrective Action? section of this report.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding: 2022-016 Department of Human Services Response/Corrective Action Plan: The Department agrees with the recommendation. The Department receives a monthly report of all payments made during the heating season. The report contains the case number, read/delivery date, and service code, allowing staff to identify potential duplicate payments. Staff will research potential duplicates, maintain a log and notes on each situation and any necessary follow-up with Human Service Zone eligibility workers. The Department does allow a child to be in two separate cases at the same time due to joint custody arrangements. A SPACES system enhancement will be implemented in December 2022, providing a warning edit when adding an individual that is known in another LIHEAP case. The edit serves as a notification to eligibility workers to verify that joint custody is appropriate in the case and to alert them to instances of a duplicate child when they may not have been aware. Contact Person: Rachel Iverson Schafer Director of Program Administration Anticipated Completion Date: Effective January 18, 2023, the system will give a warning if a client is active in another case. This will give the worker an opportunity to research and use policy to determine which case(s) the client should be in.

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →
2022-017
Eligibility
Condition

?See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table? CONDITION We found that, of the 40 cases tested from the Department of Human Services' (DHS) Legacy system for proper eligibility, 17 cases were processed as eligible without a worker verifying eligibility information through the State NDVerify system. Under the LIHEAP FFY 2021 and FFY 2022 Detailed Model Plan (SF-424) of the State Plan, Monitoring section, NDVerify is identified as the monitoring schedule and protocol under section 10.6. This section in the State Plan is the response for covering 45 CFR ? 75.342, Monitoring and Reporting Program Performance. The Department implemented a new SPACES eligibility system for LIHEAP which was used for the 2022 heating season. NDVerify is integrated into the SPACES system and there were no errors in testing that NDVerify in SPACES was searched for the 2022 heating season eligibility. CRITERIA 45 CFR 75.342(a), Monitoring by the Non-Federal Entity, states the non-Federal entity is responsible for oversight of the operations of the Federal award supported activities. The non-Federal entity must monitor its activities under Federal awards to assure compliance with applicable Federal requirements and performance expectations are being achieved. Monitoring by the non-Federal entity must cover each program, function or activity. Within the Detailed Model Plan (SF-424), section 10.6 (Monitoring), of the FFY 2021 and FFY 2022 State Plans, DHS submitted monitoring schedule and protocol using NDVerify. "The North Dakota Department of Human Services has built a web-based verification system called NDVerify that streamlines the search of different interfaces/sources to obtain verification electronically. NDVerify allows eligibility workers to search multiple interfaces/sources for all household members included in a LIHEAP case at the same time. NDVerify also stores the search based on the date completed for historical purposes." 45 CFR 75.303 states that the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. CAUSE NDVerify was not integrated with the Legacy System. The DHS does not have a policy specifically requiring workers to perform NDVerify checks for all applications. While the Detailed Model Plan (SF-424) of the State Plan identifies several eligibility checks to integrated information through NDVerify, the DHS considers the use of NDVerify as optional and an available resource rather than a requirement. EFFECT Without verifying information with available state interfaces, there is no way to tell if the applicant is providing all the necessary information and this could impact eligibility determinations. The following sources/interfaces are included with NDVerify: Birth/Death Records (ND Vital Records) Health Insurance (DEERS) ND Child Support ND Department of Corrections ND Motor Vehicle/Watercraft (Motor Vehicle/Game & Fish) ND State Directory of New Hire ND State Hospital Admission/Discharge ND Unemployment Insurance Benefits (Job Service) ND Wages (Job Service) Other Benefit Information (SSA) SNAP Intentional Program Violations WSI Medical Claims Status Request UPA Request 40 Quarters Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements (SAVE) CONTEXT The Department utilized the Legacy system for the 2021 heating season. Per the FFY 2021 Household report, there were 14,282 applications and $18,407,731.73 in payments for the LIHEAP Program. DHS implemented the SPACES system for the 2022 heating season. NDVerify is integrated with SPACES and there were no errors in testing that NDVerify was used within SPACES. Where sampling was performed, the audit used a non-statistical sampling method. IDENTIFICATION AS A REPEAT FINDING Not a repeat finding. RECOMMENDATION We recommend the Department of Human Services ensure eligibility is verified through the State NDVerify system prior to approval of all LIHEAP applications or revise the State Plan to identify the use of NDVerify as optional for approval by the Federal awarding agency. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES RESPONSE The Department disagrees with this finding. See ?Management?s Response and Corrective Action? section of this report. AUDITOR?S CONCLUDING COMMENTS DHS informed the Federal agency of their procedures for Program Integrity in Section 17 of the state plan, ?All sources and types of income that exceed $500 per year must be verified.? DHS also, outlines under their monitoring procedures in the State plan that the eligibility workers have access to the NDVerify system to verify identification and income. NDVerify allows DHS to obtain identification and income records such as birth/death records, health insurance, child support, new hire information, unemployment insurance benefits, social security administration, supplemental nutrition assistance program benefits, etc. Relying solely on hard copies from the applicant to determine eligibility and not cross-checking the information for accuracy is not verifying all sources nor following procedures that were identified to the Federal agency in the state plan.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding: 2022-017 Department of Human Services Response/Corrective Action Plan: The Department disagrees with the recommendation. NDVerify allows eligibility workers to search multiple interfaces/sources for all household members included in a LIHEAP case at the same time, however, the Department does allow for other means, such as hard copy verification from the applicant or a third-party, to support eligibility determinations. It is important to note, since fully transitioning to SPACES, no errors have been noted. Contact Person: Rachel Iverson Schafer Director of Program Administration Anticipated Completion Date ND Verify will continue to be a source for workers to utilize. FY2024 LIHEAP training will continue to train on the value of using this interface.

About Eligibility →
2022-018
Eligibility
QUESTIONED COSTS
Condition

?See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table? CONDITION The Department of Human Services, Emergency Rental Assistance (ERA) program, incorrectly calculated monthly rental assistance amounts by using the incorrect monthly rent amount and transition percentage for the applicable month of assistance. More specifically, 1 out of the 60 households sampled received monthly assistance in excess of the proper calculated payment amounts resulting in total overpayments of $977 and total likely projected questioned costs of $155,267. CRITERIA 2 CFR 200.303 states that the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. ND ERA Policies & Procedures states that, "North Dakota will implement a payment coverage structure that provides applicants with rental assistance required while supporting their transition from relying on rental assistance. Availability of assistance will be structured as follows: Months one (1) through six (6): 100% of rent will be eligible, Months seven (7) through ten (10): 85% of rent will be eligible, Months (11) through eighteen (18): 70% of rent will be eligible". The outlined policy allows for an individual to receive up to twelve months of total rental assistance including 100% of their monthly rent for the first 6 months, 85% of their monthly rent for the next four months, and 70% of their monthly rent for the final two months. CAUSE The Department of Human Services, Emergency Rental Assistance (ERA) program, review did not identify correct monthly rent amounts and applied incorrect assistance percentages used to calculate the monthly ERA payments. EFFECT The Department issued payments that were not allowable under the Emergency Rental Assistance program. CONTEXT During state fiscal years, approximately 11,178 applications, totaling $46 million were processed by the Department. The State Auditor's office performed a test of sixty applications with one error that resulted in an overpayment of $977 and projected to additional likely questioned costs of $155,267. Where sampling was performed, the audit used a non-statistical sampling method. IDENTIFICATION AS A REPEAT FINDING Not a repeat finding. RECOMMENDATION We recommend the Department of Human Services (ERA Program) ensure monthly payment amounts are calculated correctly and reviewed for accuracy. Additionally, we recommend the Department ensure the improper payments are recouped through the ERA program's refunding process. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES RESPONSE The Department of Human Services agrees with the recommendation. See ?Management?s Response and Corrective Action? section of this report.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding: 2022-018 Department of Human Services Response/Corrective Action Plan: The Department of Human Services agrees with the recommendation. The Department will ensure rent changes are accurately reflected in Service Now and therefore the monthly amount is calculated accurately. If a payment is issued in excess of what the household is eligible to receive, it is standard practice for DHS to request refunds or apply payments to future months of the renter?s direct rental obligation or direct utility assistance (as per the state?s program/policy manual). Contact Person: Nikki Aden, Director Housing Stability Anticipated Completion Date: Complete.

About Eligibility →
2022-019
Eligibility
REPEATQUESTIONED COSTS
Condition

?See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table? CONDITION During our testing of eligibility, we noted that eligibility was not properly determined by the Department of Human Services (DHS) for 1 of 60 CHIP cases that were tested. For this case, the income exceeded the Federal Poverty Line (FPL) threshold for CHIP. This resulted in a known Federal error for this case of $498 with a likely additional federal questioned cost of $52,643. CRITERIA 42 CFR 457.965 states the State must include in each applicant's record facts to support the State's determination of the applicant's eligibility for Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP). 45 CFR 75.303 states that the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. 42 CFR 431.804 ?Eligibility error? is an error resulting from the States' improper application of Federal rules and the State's documented policies and procedures that causes a beneficiary to be determined eligible when he or she is ineligible for Medicaid or CHIP, causes a beneficiary to be determined eligible for the incorrect type of assistance, causes applications for Medicaid or CHIP to be improperly denied by the State, or causes existing cases to be improperly terminated from Medicaid or CHIP by the State. An eligibility error may also be caused when a redetermination did not occur timely or a required element of the eligibility determination process (for example income) cannot be verified as being performed/completed by the state. 42 CFR 431.960(b)(1) A data processing error is an error resulting in an overpayment or underpayment that is determined from a review of the claim and other information available in the State's Medicaid Management Information System, related systems, or outside sources of provider verification resulting in Federal and/or State improper payments.) CAUSE Since the income was over the FPL for CHIP, the Department stated that state's system, SPACES, should have sustained benefits under the existing coverage which, in this one case was Medicaid (Affordable Care Act Child). The Department stated the SPACES system failed to sustain the benefits under Medicaid. Both Medicaid and CHIP are fee-for-service programs and the total payment amount was not impacted.) EFFECT The Department incorrectly claimed the FMAP rate for CHIP rather than Medicaid based on the child's category of eligibility. CONTEXT There were 18,177 payments totaling $26.2 million made during the audit period from CHIP. The individual case was from a stratified population of $17,965,913 for individual payment amounts between $1,000 to $49,999. The payment of $4,134 was projected to this stratified population of CHIP payments. The FMAP rates were then applied to the payment and the projection amount to determine the Federal amount in error which were calculated as the difference between the CHIP FMAP rate (71.85%) and Medicaid FMAP rate (59.79%). Where sampling was performed, the audit used a non-statistical sampling method. IDENTIFICATION AS A REPEAT FINDING Finding 2020-002 was reported in the immediate prior year. Findings 2018-002 and 2016-004 were reported in previous years. The prior audit finding was reported as implemented on the summary schedule of prior audit findings. This materially misrepresents the status of the finding for CHIP. RECOMMENDATION We recommend the Department of Human Services review the SPACES system edit checks and ensure eligibility determinations made for the CHIP programs are proper. We also recommend corrections to payments and Federal reimbursement of CHIP. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES RESPONSE The Department agrees with this recommendation. See ?Management?s Response and Corrective Action? section of this report.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding: 2022-019 Department of Human Services Response/Corrective Action Plan: The Department agrees with the recommendation. Due to Medicaid continuous enrollment requirements ending on March 30, 2023, the SPACES system will be converted back to its normal rules and this issue should not happen again. The Department will do a review of CHIP eligibility to ensure incorrect claims are identified and corrected. Claims paid in error will be adjusted to reflect the proper category of eligibility, so the applicable fund code is applied, which will apply the correct FMAP. Contact Person: Erik Elkins, Assistant Director, Medical Services Anticipated Completion Date: April 30, 2023

Prior Finding References

2020-002

About Eligibility →
2022-020
Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking
QUESTIONED COSTS
Condition

?See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table? CONDITION The Department of Human Services did not meet the level of effort requirement for pregnant women and women with dependent children as they were unable to provide tracking information on the expenditures for the related services provided during the audit for the 2019 and 2020 grant awards. At a minimum, the Department was required to maintain a level of effort of the 1994 base amount which was $254,665. Since the Department was unable to identify expenditures for the 2019 and 2020 grant awards, the known error is $509,330. CRITERIA 45 CFR 75.303 states that the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Per 45 CFR 96.124(c): (1) The State for fiscal year 1993 shall expend not less than five percent of the grant to increase (relative to fiscal year 1992) the availability of treatment services designed for pregnant women and women with dependent children (either by establishing new programs or expanding the capacity of existing programs). The base for fiscal year 1993 shall be an amount equal to the fiscal year 1992 alcohol and drug services Block Grant expenditures and State expenditures for pregnant women and women with dependent children as described in paragraph (e) of this section, and to this base shall be added at least 5 percent of the 1993 Block Grant allotment. The base shall be calculated using Generally Accepted Accounting Principles and the composition of the base shall be applied consistently from year to year. States shall report the methods used to calculate their base for fiscal year 1992 expenditures on treatment for pregnant women and women with dependent children. (2) For fiscal year 1994, the State shall, consistent with paragraph (c)(1) of this section, expend not less than five percent of the grant to increase (relative to fiscal year 1993) the availability of such services to pregnant women and women with dependent children. (3) For grants beyond fiscal year 1994, the States shall expend no less than an amount equal to the amount expended by the State for fiscal year 1994. CAUSE The Department indicated there are no providers offering these specialized treatment services for pregnant women and women with dependent children. EFFECT Noncompliance with 45 CFR 96.124(c) to provide treatment services designed for pregnant women and women with dependent children at no less than an amount equal to the amount expended by the State for fiscal year 1994. Pregnant women addicted to drugs or alcohol face significant risks. The drug rehab programs for pregnant women and women with children provide specific services and support. CONTEXT The 2019 and 2020 grant years were the only grants to close during the audit period. The 1994 base amount is $254,655 per grant year. The substance abuse program expenditures for SFY 2021 were $10,447,419 and SFY 2022 were $6,310,633 as reported on the SFY 2021, 2022 Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards for CFDA 93.959. Where sampling was performed, the audit used a non-statistical sampling method. IDENTIFICATION AS A REPEAT FINDING Not a repeat finding. RECOMMENDATION We recommend the Department of Human Services develop corrective action and expend, at a minimum, the amount expended by the State for fiscal year 1994, for the availability of treatment services designed for pregnant women and women with dependent children either by establishing new programs or expanding the capacity of existing programs DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES RESPONSE The Department agrees with the recommendation. See ?Management?s Response and Corrective Action? section of this report.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding: 2022-020 Department of Human Services Response/Corrective Action Plan: The Department agrees with the recommendation. These services were provided by a contracted vendor in two separate sites in different cities for over ten years. In October 2018, due to staffing performance concerns and licensing investigations, the state ended the contract with this vendor in one city. In April 2019 the vendor ended the contract in the second city. Three Requests for Proposals have been issued since that date and no proposals were received. Market research was conducted with several potential providers and due to lack of interest, capacity concerns, workforce issues as well as the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, the department has been unable to meet the expenditure requirements. The Department has met several times with the Federal Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration regarding this issue. Currently the Department is requesting funding from the North Dakota Legislative Assembly to develop of a Pregnant and Parenting Women?s Residential Treatment Program within the Department. If approved, the Department will work to secure locations and renovate spaces that is not allowable with the Federal Funds. Contact Person: Lacresha Graham, Manager Addiction Treatment and Recovery Program and Policy Anticipated Completion Date: September 2023

About Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking →
2022-021
Period of Performance
REPEATQUESTIONED COSTS
Condition

?See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table? CONDITION The Department of Human Services made payments under the Vocational Rehabilitation program outside of the period of performance for the 2019 grant award which had a period of performance of 10/1/18 - 9/30/19 with an allowable liquidation period through 1/31/2021. More specifically, the program charged $2,454 to the 2019 grant award when the underlying obligations actually occurred during the 2020 grant award period of performance. CRITERIA The following criteria note that Federal funds must be obligated by the end of the two-year period of performance window and those obligations must be liquidated within 120 days after the end date of period of performance. 2 CFR 200.344 requires: " Unless the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity authorizes an extension, a non-Federal entity must liquidate all obligations incurred under the Federal award not later than 120 calendar days after the end date of the period of performance as specified in the terms and conditions of the Federal award.? 34 CFR 361.64 requires: " (a) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, any Federal funds, including reallotted funds, that are appropriated for a fiscal year to carry out a program under this part that are not obligated by the State by the beginning of the succeeding fiscal year and any program income received during a fiscal year that is not obligated by the State by the beginning of the succeeding fiscal year remain available for obligation by the State during that succeeding fiscal year. (b) Federal funds appropriated for a fiscal year remain available for obligation in the succeeding fiscal year only to the extent that the State met the matching requirement for those Federal funds by obligating, in accordance with 34 CFR 76.707, the non-Federal share in the fiscal year for which the funds were appropriated." The following criteria pertains to the establishment and maintenance of effective internal control to ensure payments are made within the correct period of performance. 2 CFR 200.303 states the non-Federal entity must, "establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award." CAUSE The Department of Human Services, Vocational Rehabilitation Program, review of the expenditure period of performance, as outlined in its period of performance procedures, were not followed. Therefore, the grant award monitoring procedures were unable to detect payments made outside of the period of performance. EFFECT Unallowable costs totaling $2,454 were charged to the 2019 grant award with a total projected questioned cost amount of $41,717. CONTEXT The Department of Human Services, Vocational Rehabilitation program, had expenditures of $412,720 after the obligation period for the 2019 and 2020 awards. Of this amount, one payment totaling $2,454 was identified by sampling as an error. Where sampling was performed, the audit used a non-statistical sampling method. IDENTIFICATION AS A REPEAT FINDING Finding 2020-019 was reported in the immediate prior year. Findings 2018-031 and 2016-053 were reported in previous years. The prior audit finding was reported as implemented on the summary schedule of prior audit findings. This materially misrepresents the status of the finding. RECOMMENDATION We recommend the Department of Human Services follow its procedures to prevent and detect Vocational Rehabilitation payments from occurring outside the period of performance. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES RESPONSE The Department of Health and Human Services agrees with the recommendation. See ?Management?s Response and Corrective Action? section of this report.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding: 2022-021 Department of Human Services Response/Corrective Action Plan: The Department of Health and Human Services agrees with the recommendation. The Department will run reports from AWARE quarterly to identify any payments made from the system that were charged to the incorrect period of performance. Contact Person: April Haring, Program Accountant for Vocational Rehabilitation Anticipated Completion Date: The Department began running the report in December 2022.

Prior Finding References

2020-019

About Period of Performance →
2022-022
Reporting
MATERIAL WEAKNESS
Condition

?See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table? CONDITION The Department of Public Instruction did not report Child Nutrition Cluster subawards to the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) correctly. After testing FFATA reporting for the Child Nutrition Cluster, it was discovered that there were FFATA errors in the following three areas: 1. The Department of Public Instruction did not report the subaward information for the Fresh Fruit and Vegetable program (Assistance Listing number 10.582) for the 2021 grant year which runs from October 2020-September 2021. After an analysis of grant awards for that grant year, it was discovered that 14 subawards should have been reported to FFATA, totaling $1,593,654. ?See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table? 2. The Department of Public Instruction did not report the subaward information timely for the Fresh Fruit and Vegetable program (Assistance Listing number 10.582) for the 2022 grant year awards (October 2021-September 2022) awarded in October 2021. After an analysis of grant awards awarded in October 2021, we tested 5 of 13 awards and found all 5 were not submitted timely to FFATA. Four (4) of the tested awards should have been reported to FFATA by 1/31/2022. The fifth award should have been reported to FFATA by 2/28/2022. They were all reported to FFATA on 7/28/2022. Those grant awards totaled $623,000. ?See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table? 3. FFATA isn't being submitted for the following Assistance Listing numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.556 and 10.559. Because these Assistance Listing numbers are all included in one grant award, therefore, one FAIN number, they would all be reported in one FFATA report. The Department of Public Instruction did not report the subaward information for FAIN 223ND309N1099. After an analysis of these grant awards, 206 sponsors receiving total Federal grant payments over $30,000 should have been reported. Those grant payments totaled $168,897,721. The $169 million is based on payments made from 7/1/2020 - 6/30/2022. ?See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table? CRITERIA Federal regulation 2 CFR 170, Appendix A requires a Federal Financial Assistance Transparency Act (FFATA) report for each subaward that equals or exceeds $30,000 no later than the end of the month following the month in which the obligation was made. The subaward information is then available to the public on the USA Spending website for transparency. 2 CFR 200.303(a) states that non-Federal entities must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. CAUSE Based on discussion with staff, a lack of understanding of FFATA reporting requirements resulted in the FFATA reporting errors. The Department of Public Instruction is only reporting FFATA for the Fresh Fruit and Vegetable program because the amounts given to sponsors is predetermined and not reimbursement based. For the other programs in the Child Nutrition Cluster, DPI does not report FFATA because they are meal count grants and amounts are not predetermined. There is no waiver or statement in the grant terms and conditions for the meal count grants saying that FFATA doesn?t need to be completed for these programs. The Department also couldn?t find a waiver or any information from their USDA contact saying that FFATA doesn?t need to be completed. Therefore, the FFATA should have been completed for all programs in the Child Nutrition Cluster. Because the awards to sponsors are not predetermined, the auditor is reporting grant payments during the audit period instead of award amounts. EFFECT Not meeting the FFATA requirements increases the likelihood that the public will not have access to transparent and accurate information regarding expenditures of Federal awards. Additionally, Federal regulations address actions that Federal agencies may impose if a state entity does not comply with the U.S. Constitution, Federal statutes, regulations, or the terms and conditions of a Federal award. According to 2 CFR 200.208(c), ?Specific conditions,? these actions may include ? requiring reimbursement instead of advance payments; ? not allowing the agency to proceed to the next phase until it submits evidence of acceptable performance; ? requiring additional, more detailed financial reports or additional project monitoring; ? requiring the agency to obtain technical or management assistance; or ? establishing other prior approvals. If the Federal agency determines the state agency cannot remedy its noncompliance through the above actions, 2 CFR 200.339, ?Remedies for noncompliance,? outlines additional actions the Federal agency may take. Depending on the circumstances, these actions may include ? temporarily withholding payments until the noncompliance has been corrected, ? denying the use of funds, ? partly or fully suspending or terminating the Federal award, ? suspending or debarring the agency, ? withholding further awards for the project or program, or ? pursuing other available legal remedies. CONTEXT There were 539 sponsors receiving Federal grant awards during our audit period totaling $174,653,181. Of those 539 sponsors, 233 (43%) were over the $30,000 threshold and should have been reported to FFATA, for a total of $172,004,887 (98%). Of the 233 sponsors over the $30,000 threshold, only 13 sponsors (6%) were reported to FFATA, totaling $1,513,512 (1%). This results in 220 sponsors receiving Federal grant awards (94%) not reported to FFATA, totaling $170,491,375 (99%). Where sampling was performed, the audit used a non-statistical sampling method. IDENTIFICATION AS A REPEAT FINDING Not a repeat finding. RECOMMENDATION We recommend the Department of Public Instruction ensures timely and accurate submission of FFATA reports in accordance with Federal regulations and retain further instructions or waiver from the Federal agency. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION RESPONSE We agree with the finding. See ?Management?s Response and Corrective Action? section of this report.

Corrective Action Plan

Department of Public Instruction Finding: 2022-022 Department of Public Instruction Response/Corrective Action Plan: We agree with the finding. Currently, USDA and DOE sub-awards are reported after the obligation or sub-award has been approved by all parties according to the requirements established by FSRS?s website. The Block Award, or the federal award which reimburses for meals claimed, will be reported after the meals have been claimed in NDFoods and paid in Peoplesoft. NDDPI will report the payments already made for FY 2023 and will work with our NDIT programmers to allow us to create an auto-generated report from NDFoods that will upload into the FSRS website according to FSRS?s template. To enter expenditure data by month in FSRS, Awardees are encouraged to complete a template to upload the required data. Unfortunately, NDDPI is aware of an issue with this template caused by the need for a 4-digit extension number. The lack of 4-digit zip code extensions with our rural sub-recipients is responsible for throwing this error in the upload. To complete a successful upload, NDDPI will omit any sub-recipients missing the 4-digit zip code extension from the monthly data or template and add them to the report with a manual entry on the website. The Director of CN and the CN Technology Coordinator will work with NDIT to program the needed reports from NDFoods. The Administrative Officer and the Account/Budget Specialist from the Fiscal Management office will be responsible for completing the upload and entering any manual data. After we have a defined set of steps to follow, we will create a written process and edit as needed. Contact Person Linda Schloer, Director, Child Nutrition and Food Distribution Programs Scott Egge, Technology Coordinator, Child Nutrition Kim Vega, Administrative Officer III, Fiscal Management Leon Rauser, Account/Budget Specialist, Fiscal Management Anticipated Completion Date Begin manual process procedure, 04/01/2023, enter sub-recipient data monthly from October 2022 forward until an automated process can be obtained. Autogenerated process date is uncertain, NDDPI will work with NDIT to establish an automated process as soon as IT?s schedule allows and testing is completed.

About Reporting →
2022-023
Subrecipient Monitoring
REPEAT
Condition

?See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table? CONDITION The Department of Public Instruction did not make subrecipients aware of all required grant award information for the Child Nutrition Cluster program prior to February of 2021. CRITERIA 31 U.S.C. 7502(f)(2)(A) states that each pass-through entity shall provide subrecipient the Federal requirements which govern the use of such awards. 2 CFR 200.332 states the required information that pass-through entities must disclose. This includes information related to Federal award identification, requirements imposed by the pass-through entity on the subrecipient, any additional requirements, approved federally recognized indirect cost rate, requirement that the subrecipient allow access to records, and appropriate terms and conditions concerning closeout of the subaward. 2 CFR 200.303(a) states that non-Federal entities must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. CAUSE The prior audit finding corrective action wasn't implemented until February of 2021. Therefore, the grant templates were still missing information as was documented during the 2019-2020 single audit. EFFECT Subrecipients may not have been aware of all necessary grant information and requirements. CONTEXT During our audit period, there were 412 subrecipients receiving Federal grant agreements for the Child Nutrition Cluster program. During 2021, there were 215 subrecipients and 197 in 2022. As there was a similar finding in our prior audit that was not implemented until February of 2021, only grants obligated after this date and before the end of our audit period of 6/30/2022 were considered in our testing. Grants made prior to February 2021 were considered to have missing information. During our testing, no missing information was noted in grants made after February 2021. Where sampling was performed, the audit used a non-statistical sampling method. IDENTIFICATION AS A REPEAT FINDING Finding 2020-022 was reported in the immediate prior year. Finding 2018-042 and 2016-068 were made in previous years. The prior audit finding was reported as implemented on the summary schedule of prior audit findings. This materially misrepresents the status of the finding. RECOMMENDATION We recommend the Department of Public Instruction continue the corrective action that was implemented in February of 2021 to ensure subrecipients are made aware of all required grant award information for the Child Nutrition Cluster program. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION RESPONSE The Department of Public Instruction agrees with the recommendation See ?Management?s Response and Corrective Action? section of this report.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding: 2022-023 Department of Public Instruction Response/Corrective Action Plan: The Department of Public Instruction agrees with the recommendation. When this issue was pointed out to us in the prior audit in February of 2021, we immediately made the change to our grant awards. Contact Person Jamie Mertz, Fiscal Management Director Anticipated Completion Date Implemented in February 2021

Prior Finding References

2020-022

About Subrecipient Monitoring →
2022-024
Subrecipient Monitoring
REPEAT
Condition

?See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table? CONDITION The Department of Public Instruction did not make subrecipients aware of all required grant award information for the Child and Adult Care Food program prior to February of 2021. CRITERIA 31 U.S.C. 7502(f)(2)(A) states that each pass-through entity shall provide subrecipient the Federal requirements which govern the use of such awards. 2 CFR 200.332 states the required information that pass-through entities must disclose. This includes information related to Federal award identification, requirements imposed by the pass-through entity on the subrecipient, any additional requirements, approved federally recognized indirect cost rate, requirement that the subrecipient allow access to records, and appropriate terms and conditions concerning closeout of the subaward. 2 CFR 200.303(a) states that non-Federal entities must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. CAUSE The prior audit finding corrective action wasn't implemented until February of 2021. Therefore, grant templates were still missing information as was documented during the 2019-2020 single audit. EFFECT Subrecipients may not have been aware of all necessary grant information and requirements. CONTEXT During our audit period, there were 236 subrecipients receiving Federal grant agreements for the Child and Adult Care Food program. During 2021, there were 126 subrecipients and 110 in 2022. As there was a similar finding in our prior audit that was not implemented until February of 2021, only grants obligated after this date and before the end of our audit period of 6/30/2022 were considered in our testing. Grants made prior to February of 2021 were considered to have missing information. During our testing, no missing information was noted in grants made after February of 2021. Where sampling was performed, the audit used a non-statistical sampling method. IDENTIFICATION AS A REPEAT FINDING Finding 2020-022 was reported in the immediate prior year. Finding 2018-042 and 2016-068 were made in previous years. The prior audit finding was reported as implemented on the summary schedule of prior audit findings. This materially misrepresents the status of the finding. RECOMMENDATION We recommend the Department of Public Instruction continue the corrective action that was implemented in February of 2021 to ensure subrecipients are made aware of all required grant award information for the Child and Adult Care Food program. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION RESPONSE The Department of Public Instruction agrees with the recommendation See ?Management?s Response and Corrective Action? section of this report.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding: 2022-024 Department of Public Instruction Response/Corrective Action Plan: The Department of Public Instruction agrees with the recommendation. When this issue was pointed out to us in the prior audit in February of 2021, we immediately made the change to our grant awards. Contact Person Jamie Mertz, Fiscal Management Director Anticipated Completion Date Implemented in February 2021

Prior Finding References

2020-022

About Subrecipient Monitoring →
2022-025
Special Tests & Provisions
Condition

?See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table? CONDITION The Department of Public Instruction did not formally track that letters of intent were received from all non-public schools. CRITERIA 18005(a) CARES Act: Section 18005(a) of the CARES Act requires a Local Educational Agency (LEA) that receives funds under the ESSER Fund to provide equitable services in the same manner as provided under section 1117 of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (ESEA) to students and teachers in non-public schools, as determined in consultation with representatives of non-public schools. 1117(b)(1) of the ESEA: (b)CONSULTATION. ? (1) IN GENERAL.?To ensure timely and meaningful consultation, a local educational agency shall consult with appropriate private school officials during the design and development of such agency?s programs under this part. Such agency and private school officials shall both have the goal of reaching agreement on how to provide equitable and effective programs for eligible private school children, the results of which agreement shall be transmitted to the ombudsman designated under subsection (a)(3)(B). 34 CFR 76.665(b)(1): An LEA must promptly consult with representatives of non-public elementary and secondary schools during the design and development of the LEA's plans to spend funds from a CARES Act program and before the LEA makes any decision affecting the opportunities of students and teachers in non-public schools to benefit from those funds. As provided in section 1117(b)(1) of the ESEA, the LEA and non-public school officials shall both have the goal of reaching timely agreement on how to provide equitable and effective programs for non-public school students and teachers. 2 CFR 200.303(a) states that non-Federal entities must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. CAUSE The Department of Public Instruction stated that they manually tracked the letters of intent but did not retain a record of this process to support that all letters of intent were received. EFFECT The lack of adequate procedures for tracking non-public school letters of intent increase the risk of non-public schools not participating in the program. CONTEXT The Department of Public Instruction (DPI) is responsible for initiating the consulting process by contacting representatives in all non-public schools in the state to notify them of the opportunity for their students and teachers to obtain equitable services. If non-public school officials want equitable services for their students and teachers, DPI must consult with those officials before DPI makes any decision that affects the opportunity of non-public school to participate in the activities funded under the CARES Act programs. If a non-public school declines to participate in the CARES Act programs or does not respond to DPI's good-faith effort to make contact, DPI has no further responsibility to provide equitable services to students or teachers in that school. However, DPI must be able to demonstrate that it made a good faith effort to contact all the nonpublic schools in the state. Where sampling was performed, the audit used a non-statistical sampling method. IDENTIFICATION AS A REPEAT FINDING Not a repeat finding. RECOMMENDATION We recommend the Department of Public Instruction improve procedures for tracking to ensure all Education Stabilization program letters of intent from non-public schools are received in order to verify all of them were contacted. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION RESPONSE The Department of Public Instruction agrees with this finding. See ?Management?s Response and Corrective Action? section of this report.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding: 2022-025 Department of Public Instruction Response/Corrective Action Plan: The Department of Public Instruction agrees with this finding. The Department of Public Instruction is reviewing and rewriting ESSER I Equitable Services internal procedures to ensure that the records are retained in digital format. Contact Person Ann Ellefson, Academic Support Director Anticipated Completion Date This process will be completed by March 31, 2023.

About Special Tests and Provisions →
2022-026
Reporting
Condition

?See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table? CONDITION The Department of Public Instruction did not report accurate information for the Education Stabilization Fund program Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) reporting. ?See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table? CRITERIA Per Federal regulation, 2 CFR 170, Appendix A: prime awardees are required to submit a Federal Financial Assistance Transparency Act (FFATA) report for each subaward made no later than the end of the month following the month in which an obligation was made. Also, according to this regulation, prime awardees must report information about each obligating action per the instructions posted in the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act Subaward Reporting System (FSRS) website. The FSRS website also has a data definition guide that defines what is supposed to be submitted in each available field. Per this definition guide: the sub-award obligation action date is "the date of the sub-award obligation." The amount of the sub-award is "the amount of the sub-contract award for this sub-awardee" and the data model also states that the amount of the sub-award is "The net dollar amount of Federal funds awarded to the Sub-awardee including modifications". Title 2 of the Code of Federal Regulations was updated to increase the subaward reporting requirement for grants from $25,000 to $30,000. Only subawards $30,000 or above require reports for prime grant awards as of November 12, 2020 as seen on the Final Registry - Guidance for Grants and Agreements - OMB Rule 85 FR 49506. 2 CFR 200.303(a) states that non-Federal entities must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. CAUSE North Dakota Department of Public Instruction (DPI) submitted inaccurate information and amounts based on the instructions and data definitions found at the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act Subaward Reporting System (FSRS) website. DPI also had a misunderstanding of the reporting threshold. EFFECT Subaward information that was reported was inaccurate and published later than required by Federal regulations. Subawards for ESSER I discretionary funds were not reported and two ESSER I awards were not reported. CONTEXT With 3 Federal grants, the Department of Public Instruction issued a total of 496 awards to 170 unique subrecipients for a total amount of $435,446,613.83 during our audit period of 7/1/2020-6/30/2022 that were susceptible to FFATA reporting. While it appears all required reports were submitted for ESSER II and ESSER III related awards, ESSER I discretionary fund awards did not get reported as well as any subrecipients that received more than $25,000 but less than $30,000. The ESSER I Federal Award also states that grants funded at $25,000 or more that meet the reporting conditions are to be reported. DPI did report the information directly from their grant awards, but DPI did not report all of the subawards within the required time based on when they were originally awarded. With ESSER III funds, DPI had to do some redistribution of funds causing their FFATA reporting to be overstated. DPI double-reported their awards instead of reporting the adjustment from the redistribution since the initial allocation was already reported. In our testing, the overstatement was $3,278,598. Where sampling was performed, the audit used a non-statistical sampling method. IDENTIFICATION AS A REPEAT FINDING Not a repeat finding. RECOMMENDATION We recommend the Department of Public Instruction ensure FFATA reports are submitted timely and accurately according to the instructions and definitions posted on the FSRS website and in the grant award. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION RESPONSE The Department of Public Instruction agrees with the Recommendation. See ?Management?s Response and Corrective Action? section of this report.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding: 2022-026 Department of Public Instruction Response/Corrective Action Plan: The Department of Public Instruction agrees with the Recommendation. The following additional review and approval has been implemented. ? All ESSER I awards issued with discretionary funds as well as all awards funded at $25K but less than $30K have been reported to FFATA. ? When an award is made, the grant manager includes all information including the date the grant award was created on the FFATA batch upload spreadsheet for that month. ? Before the end of the following month, the prior month?s FFATA spreadsheet is uploaded to the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act Subaward Reporting System. ? Clarification is included in the process to ensure the accurate amount is reported and the amount reported for ESSER III has been updated within FFATA. We believe the implementation of this process will eliminate the inconsistencies and errors occurring across programs so this report is done timely and accurately. Contact Person Jamie Mertz, Fiscal Management Director Anticipated Completion Date Process change was implemented on September 1, 2022

About Reporting →
2022-027
Subrecipient Monitoring
Condition

?See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table? CONDITION The Department of Public Instruction did not complete any risk assessments for 3 of 5 subrecipients sampled and only completed a risk assessment once during our audit period for the other 2 sampled even though they received separate grants during each fiscal year. CRITERIA 2 CFR 200.332 (b) states "All pass-through entities must: Evaluate each subrecipient's risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring described in paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section, which may include consideration of such factors as: (1) The subrecipient's prior experience with the same or similar subawards; (2) The results of previous audits including whether or not the subrecipient receives a Single Audit in accordance with Subpart F of this part, and the extent to which the same or similar subaward has been audited as a major program; (3) Whether the subrecipient has new personnel or new or substantially changed systems; and (4) The extent and results of Federal awarding agency monitoring (e.g., if the subrecipient also receives Federal awards directly from a Federal awarding agency)." Department of Public Instruction awarded grants to subrecipients annually under this program. As such, a risk assessment should be completed annually for each subrecipient in which a new grant was awarded to them. 2 CFR 200.303(a) states that non-Federal entities must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. CAUSE The Department of Public Instruction did not complete risk assessments for subrecipients as the Comprehensive Literacy program had a high turnover of staff that were administering the program and the Department did not have this responsibility assigned to someone during parts of our audit period. EFFECT The Department of Public Instruction is not adjusting their subrecipient monitoring based on risk assessments completed for the subrecipients in compliance with Federal regulations. CONTEXT The Department of Public Instruction distributed approximately $23,250,000 in Federal funds under the Comprehensive Literacy program to 25 different local education agency subrecipients. While these subrecipients did receive monitoring procedures no adjustments were made to individual subrecipients based on results of risk assessments. Where sampling was performed, the audit used a non-statistical sampling method. IDENTIFICATION AS A REPEAT FINDING Not a repeat finding. RECOMMENDATION We recommend the Department of Public Instruction ensure risk assessments are completed for each grant their subrecipients receive and adjust monitoring procedures as necessary based on the results of these assessments. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION RESPONSE The Department of Public Instruction agrees with the recommendation. See ?Management?s Response and Corrective Action? section of this report.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding: 2022-027 Department of Public Instruction Response/Corrective Action Plan: The Department of Public Instruction agrees with the Recommendation. The risk assessment process has been completed for Comprehensive Literacy State Development awards for the 2023-2024 school year. The department is contracting with the Vander Weele Group to assist the department in designing a comprehensive federal programs monitoring system, which will take into account the sub-recipient risk. Contact Person Ann Ellefson, Academic Support Director Anticipated Completion Date 2022-2023 risk assessments for Comprehensive Literacy will be finalized by March 31, 2023.

About Subrecipient Monitoring →
2022-028
Subrecipient Monitoring
Condition

?See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table? CONDITION The Department of Public Instruction did not make subrecipients aware of all required grant award information for the Comprehensive Literacy program as all grant templates used did not include the subaward budget period start and end date. CRITERIA 2 CFR 200.332 states required information that pass-through entities must disclose to subrecipients, including paragraph (a)(1)(vi) "Subaward Budget Period State and End Date" 2 CFR 200.303(a) states that non-Federal entities must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. CAUSE The Comprehensive Literacy Program did not update their grant templates to include a new requirement that was added to the relevant Federal codes and went into effect January 1, 2021. EFFECT Subrecipients may not have been made aware of all necessary grant information and requirements. CONTEXT The Comprehensively Literacy program grants subawards annually under each of the Federal grants it received under the program. During our audit period, there were 2 Federal awards granted out to subrecipients a total of 35 times each fiscal year. The grant agreements shared a template each year and it was found that all were missing a newly required piece of information after the relevant CFR was modified and an update went into effect on January 1, 2021. Where sampling was performed, the audit used a non-statistical sampling method. IDENTIFICATION AS A REPEAT FINDING Not a repeat finding. RECOMMENDATION We recommend the Department of Public Instruction ensure that subrecipients are made aware of all required grant award information. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION RESPONSE The Department of Public Instruction agrees with the recommendation. See ?Management?s Response and Corrective Action? section of this report.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding: 2022-028 Department of Public Instruction Response/Corrective Action Plan: The Department of Public Instruction agrees with the recommendation. The Department of Public Instruction has multiple individuals who watch for changes to federal regulations. The budget period requirement was missed by DPI and we appreciate the State Auditor?s Office for identifying this. Immediately upon having this been pointed out to us we added the information to our grant award notifications. Contact Person Jamie Mertz, Fiscal Management Director Anticipated Completion Date Change to grant award notifications was implemented in October 2022

About Subrecipient Monitoring →
2022-029
Reporting
Condition

?See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table? CONDITION The Department of Public Instruction did not report accurate information for the Comprehensive Literacy program in the 5 subawards tested out of a total 35 subawards issued during our audit period. 3 of the subawards tested were also submitted a month later than required by Federal regulations after funds were originally obligated in November of 2020 and the reports were not made until January of 2021. ?See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table? CRITERIA Per Federal regulation, 2 CFR 170, Appendix A, prime awardees are required to submit a Federal Financial Assistance Transparency Act (FFATA) report for each subaward made no later than the end of the month following the month in which an obligation was made. Also according to this regulation, prime awardees must report information about each obligating action per the instructions posted on the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act Subaward Reporting System (FSRS) website. The FSRS website also has a data definition guide that defines what is supposed to be submitted in each available field. Per this definition guide: the sub-award project description "Describes the sub-award project" with an added note to "be precise as possible" and "not use any abbreviations or acronyms." The sub-award number is defined as "This is the number used by the prime award to uniquely track the sub-award (their own numbering system for the sub-award)." The sub-award obligation action date is "the date of the sub-award obligation." The amount of the sub-award is "the amount of the sub-contract award for this sub-awardee". 2 CFR 200.303(a) states that non-Federal entities must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. CAUSE North Dakota Department of Public Instruction submitted inaccurate information based on the instructions and data definitions found at the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act Subaward Reporting System (FSRS) website. The Department also did not submit FFATA reports in a timely manner due to not recognizing that obligations were not made to subawardees until a month after reimbursement payments were made against the obligations. EFFECT Subaward information that is published to the USAspending.gov website was inaccurate and published later than required by Federal regulations. CONTEXT During our audit period the Department of Public Instruction (DPI) issued a total of 35 subawards to 20 unique subrecipients under the Comprehensive Literacy Program for sub-awardees that had obligations of $30,000 or more. DPI reported all of these sub-awards, totaling of $25.2 million, to the FSRS system. While it appears all required reports were submitted and DPI did report the information directly from their grant awards, some of the fields were reported using the wrong information in error for all of the sub-awards tested. DPI also did not report all of the subawards within the required time based on when they were originally awarded. Where sampling was performed, the audit used a non-statistical sampling method. IDENTIFICATION AS A REPEAT FINDING Not a repeat finding. RECOMMENDATION We recommend the Department of Public Instruction ensure FFATA reports are submitted timely and accurately according to the instructions and definitions posted on the FSRS website. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION RESPONSE The Department of Public Instruction agrees with the Recommendation. See ?Management?s Response and Corrective Action? section of this report.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding: 2022-029 Department of Public Instruction Response/Corrective Action Plan: The Department of Public Instruction agrees with the Recommendation. The following additional review and approval has been implemented. ? When an award is made, the grant manager includes all information including the date the grant award was created on the FFATA batch upload spreadsheet for that month. ? Before the end of the following month, the prior month?s FFATA spreadsheet is uploaded to the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act Subaward Reporting System. ? Clarification is included in the process to ensure the accurate amount is reported. We believe the implementation of this process will eliminate the inconsistencies and errors occurring across programs so this report is done timely and accurately. Contact Person Jamie Mertz, Fiscal Management Director Anticipated Completion Date Process change was implemented on September 1, 2022

About Reporting →
2022-030
Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking
MATERIAL WEAKNESS
Condition

?See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table? CONDITION The Department of Public Instruction did not meet the maintenance of effort requirement for the 2021-2022 school year for the Supporting Effective Instruction program during the audit period. CRITERIA 34 CFR section 299.5a General. An LEA receiving funds under an applicable program listed in paragraph (b) of this section may receive its full allocation of funds only if the SEA finds that either the combined fiscal effort per student or the aggregate expenditures of State and local funds with respect to the provision of free public education in the LEA for the preceding fiscal year was not less than 90 percent of the combined fiscal effort per student or the aggregate expenditures for the second preceding fiscal year. SEC. 8521 of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (ESEA) (20 U.S.C. 7901) MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT. (a) IN GENERAL.?A local educational agency may receive funds under a covered program for any fiscal year only if the State educational agency finds that either the combined fiscal effort per student or the aggregate expenditures of the agency and the State with respect to the provision of free public education by the agency for the preceding fiscal year was not less than 90 percent of the combined fiscal effort or aggregate expenditures for the second preceding fiscal year, subject to the requirements of subsection (b). 2 CFR 200.303(a) states that non-Federal entities must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. CAUSE The Department of Public Instruction indicated that a waiver for the maintenance of effort requirement for the 2021-2022 school year was received. However, they were unable to locate any documentation supporting the waiver. EFFECT The Department of Public Instruction is not in compliance with the 90% maintenance of effort requirement for the 2021-2022 school year. CONTEXT The Department of Public Instruction distributed $9,575,000 in Federal funds under the Supporting Effective Instruction program to 159 different school districts during the 2021-2022 school year. Where sampling was performed, the audit used a non-statistical sampling method. IDENTIFICATION AS A REPEAT FINDING Not a repeat finding. RECOMMENDATION We recommend the Department of Public Instruction ensure the maintenance of effort requirement is met in accordance with the Supporting Effective Instruction program guidelines. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION RESPONSE The Department of Public Instruction agrees with the finding. See ?Management?s Response and Corrective Action? section of this report.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding: 2022-030 Department of Public Instruction Response/Corrective Action Plan: The Department of Public Instruction agrees with the finding. All pertinent information pertaining to the allocation of Title Program funds will be stored in a single location, both physical and electronic. Contact Person Jamie Mertz, Fiscal Management Director Anticipated Completion Date March 1, 2023

About Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking →
2022-031
Subrecipient Monitoring
Condition

?See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table? CONDITION The Department of Public Instruction did not complete a risk assessment for any awards to subrecipients of the Supporting Effective Instruction program during the audit period. CRITERIA 2 CFR 200.332 ? states that all pass-through entities must: (b) Evaluate each subrecipient?s risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring. 2 CFR 200.303(a) states that non-Federal entities must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. CAUSE The Department of Public Instruction overlooked completing subrecipient risk assessments due to the continued response of the COVID-19 pandemic. EFFECT Department of Public Instruction is not able to verify that subrecipients are compliant with Federal statutes, regulations, and terms and conditions of the subaward because there was no risk assessment completed for subrecipients in order to determine appropriate monitoring. CONTEXT The Department of Public Instruction distributed approximately $19,000,000 in Federal funds under the Supporting Effective Instruction program to 168 different subrecipients. While these subrecipients did receive monitoring procedures, no adjustments were made to individual subrecipients based on the results of risk assessments. IDENTIFICATION AS A REPEAT FINDING Not a repeat finding. RECOMMENDATION We recommend the Department of Public Instruction ensure subrecipient risk assessments are completed timely and used to determine the nature and extent of subrecipient monitoring for the Supporting Effective Instruction program. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION RESPONSE The Department of Public Instruction agrees with the recommendation. See ?Management?s Response and Corrective Action? section of this report.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding: 2022-031 Department of Public Instruction Response/Corrective Action Plan: The Department of Public Instruction agrees with the recommendation. The risk assessment process has been completed for Supporting Effective Instruction awards for the 2023-2024 school year. The department is contracting with the Vander Weele Group to assist the department in designing a comprehensive federal programs monitoring system, which will take into account the sub-recipient risk. Contact Person Ann Ellefson, Academic Support Director Anticipated Completion Date 2022-2023 risk assessments for Supporting Effective Instruction will be finalized by March 31, 2023.

About Subrecipient Monitoring →
2022-032
Eligibility
QUESTIONED COSTS
Condition

?See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table? CONDITION The Department of Public Instruction (DPI) incorrectly included neglected or delinquent facilities as part of their Title IIA allocation to Local Educational Agencies (LEA). We selected a sample of 36 and identified a 100% error rate. The total known allocation error identified was $62,546.99. When projected against the population, the total projected error is $115,041.65. CRITERIA The Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (ESEA Section 2102(a)(1)) states, the State, acting through the State educational agency (DPI), shall award subgrants to eligible local educational agencies. 2 CFR 200.303(a) states that non-Federal entities must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. CAUSE The Department of Public Instruction was unaware that neglected and delinquent facilities could not be included in their Title IIA allocation calculations and on subrecipient's grant awards. EFFECT The Department did not comply with the allocation requirements to LEAs for Title IIA grants. CONTEXT The Department of Public Instruction allocated $9,503,744 in Federal funds to 183 school districts during the 2020-2021 school year and $9,603,024 in Federal funds to 170 school districts during the 2021-2022 school year. Where sampling was performed, the audit used a non-statistical sampling method. IDENTIFICATION AS A REPEAT FINDING Not a repeat finding. RECOMMENDATION We recommend the Department of Public Instruction ensure the Title IIA allocations are calculated based on the Federal requirements. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION RESPONSE The NDDPI agrees with the recommendation. See ?Management?s Response and Corrective Action? section of this report.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding: 2022-032 Department of Public Instruction Response/Corrective Action Plan: The NDDPI Agrees with the recommendation. When calculating 2023-2024 and future allocations, the NDDPI will ensure compliance with ESEA Section 2102(a)(1) and will not include Neglected and Delinquent facilities in the allocation or equitable share processes. Additionally, the NDDPI will communicate the change in practices to impacted public school districts and Neglected and Delinquent facilities during spring/summer 2023. Contact Person Allocations: Jamie Mertz, Fiscal Management Director Correspondence: Ann Ellefson, Academic Support Director Anticipated Completion Date The process will be complete by July 1, 2023.

About Eligibility →
2022-033
Subrecipient Monitoring
REPEAT
Condition

?See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table? CONDITION The Department of Public Instruction did not ensure all subrecipients either submitted a Single Audit report or certification form identifying a Single Audit is not required. In addition, the Department did not issue management decisions on auditing findings within 6 months or ensure that timely and appropriate corrective action was taken in all applicable instances. We selected a sample of 60 subrecipients of the total 795 in our population for testing. During our testing, 6 of the 60 subrecipients did not submit a certification form identifying whether a Single Audit was required. The Department indicated that a Single Audit report was not received but we are unable to determine whether one was required. For 4 additional subrecipients, the Department did not receive a Single Audit, issue management decisions on auditing findings within 6 months, or ensure appropriate corrective action was taken. The Department did track all of their subrecipients in a spreadsheet that captured information relating to when their certified Federal expenditure information was received as well as if a single audit is required of them. However, due to the errors noted in receiving this information as well as following up with completed single audits in a timely manner in our sample tested, it was determined that this spreadsheet was not being fully utilized. CRITERIA 2 CFR 200.331(f) states that a pass-through entity must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by 2 CFR 200 Subpart F. 2 CFR 200.331(d)(2) states that a pass-through entity must ensure subrecipients take timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity through audits, on-site reviews, and other means. 2 CFR 200.521(d) states that a pass-through entity must issue a management decision within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the Federal Audit Clearinghouse. 2 CFR 200.303(a) states that non-Federal entities must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. CAUSE The Department of Public Instruction maintains a spreadsheet to track all subrecipient audit report monitoring. However, they did not ensure that everyone on the spreadsheet provided a Single Audit report or certification of total federal expenditures. EFFECT Subrecipients spending more than $750,000 from all Federal sources may not be obtaining audits as required or implementing a corrective action plan in a timely manner if findings are noted in audits that were completed. CONTEXT The 4 subrecipients that did not provide a Single Audit report received approximately $9.9 million dollars in Federal expenditures. The additional 6 entities that did not provide certifications indicating their total Federal awards received approximately $1.5 million dollars. We did verify that the 6 entities that failed to provide certifications did not have Single Audit reports submitted to the clearing house. Where sampling was performed, the audit used a non-statistical sampling method. IDENTIFICATION AS A REPEAT FINDING Finding 2020-021 was reported in the immediate prior year. Finding 2018-041 was reported in a previous year. The prior audit finding was reported as implemented on the summary schedule of prior audit findings. This materially misrepresents the status of the finding. RECOMMENDATION We recommend the Department of Public Instruction: ? Ensure all subrecipients obtain audits in accordance with 2 CFR 200 Subpart F if they meet the requirements; ? Issue management decisions within a timely manner; ? Ensure subrecipients took timely corrective action on deficiencies identified in the audits. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION RESPONSE The Department of Public Instruction agrees with the finding. See ?Management?s Response and Corrective Action? section of this report.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding: 2022-033 Department of Public Instruction Response/Corrective Action Plan: The Department of Public Instruction agrees with the finding. For the FY 2021 audits we increased the emphasis on reviewing subrecipient?s single audits. We had a 100% response rate on our audit survey and reviewed submitted reports in a timely manner. We still have some subrecipients who have not completed their FY 2021 audits do to various reasons. We check in with these entities on a quarterly basis to get updates on the status of their audits. We are on track for similar results for the FY 2022 audits. Contact Person Jamie Mertz, Director of Fiscal Services Anticipated Completion Date Already implemented

Prior Finding References

2020-021

About Subrecipient Monitoring →
2022-034
Reporting
MATERIAL WEAKNESS
Condition

?See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table? CONDITION We identified Coronavirus Relief Fund (CRF) quarterly financial progress reports were incomplete, inaccurate and did not reconcile to the state's accounting system. CRITERIA Federal regulation, 2 CFR 200.303, requires non-Federal entities, in part, to establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Office of Management and Budget, 2 CFR Part 200, Appendix XI, 2021 and 2022 Compliance Supplements, for Assistance Listing 21.019 Coronavirus Relief Fund, states in part: Each prime recipient of the Fund shall provide a quarterly Financial Progress Report that contains COVID-19 related costs incurred during the covered period (the period beginning on March 1, 2020; and ending on December 31, 2021) to Treasury OIG. Each prime recipient shall report this quarterly information mentioned above into the Grant Solutions portal. The prime recipient?s quarterly Financial Progress Report submissions should be supported by the data in the prime recipient?s accounting system. Key Line Items ? The following line items from the reporting contain critical information: (1) The total amount of payments from the Fund received from Treasury. (2) The amount of funds received that were expended or obligated for each project or activity. (3) A detailed list of all projects or activities for which funds were expended or obligated, including: a. The name of the project or activity b. A description of the project or activity (4) Detailed information on any loans issued; contracts and grants awarded; transfers made to other government entities; and direct payments made by the prime recipient that are greater than $50,000. For amounts less than $50,000, the prime recipient must report in the aggregate for these expenditure categories. For direct payments to individuals, aggregate reporting is required to be reported regardless of amount. Beginning September 21, 2020, prime recipients were required to submit via the Grant Solutions portal the first detailed quarterly Financial Progress Report, which cover the period March 1 through June 30, 2020 (with exception to the September 21 first quarter deadline and the October 13 second quarter reporting deadlines for those prime recipients using Grant Solutions? upload feature, which was available December 1, 2020). Thereafter, quarterly reporting will be due no later than ten days after each calendar quarter. If the 10th calendar day falls on a weekend or a Federal holiday, the due date will be the next working day. Reporting shall end with either the calendar quarter after the COVID-19 related costs and expenditures have been liquidated and paid or the calendar quarter ending September 30, 2022, whichever comes first. The prime recipient?s quarterly Financial Progress Report submission should be supported by the data in the prime recipient?s accounting system. Department of the Treasury Office of Inspector General Coronavirus Relief Frequently Asked Questions Related to Reporting and Recordkeeping (OIG-CA-20-028R), if an error is identified or a modification needs to be made after a report is already approved by the Treasury OIG, the prime recipient will need to make the modification or correction in the next quarterly reporting cycle. CAUSE There was a lack of understanding across state agencies of the detailed requirements of Coronavirus Relief Fund reporting. The North Dakota Office of Management and Budget (OMB) provided the CRF Report Template, Data Upload Service Data Dictionary, Coronavirus Relief Fund Frequently Asked Questions, and instructions to all state agencies. However, OMB?s procedures to review the information submitted by state agencies did not detect all material errors and omissions within the reporting cycle. In addition, the short turnaround time for reporting deadlines contributed to reporting errors and omissions. EFFECT Inaccurate Federal reporting reduces transparency and may impair the Federal oversight agency's ability to properly oversee the program. CONTEXT State agencies prepared and submitted CRF report templates to the ND Office of Management and Budget (OMB). OMB compiled the information into a master CRF report template for submission. We randomly selected the quarters ending December 30, 2020, and December 31, 2021, to test across 11 state agencies. One agency did not have expenditures in the quarter ending December 31, 2021; therefore, we judgmentally selected the quarter ending March 31, 2021, to test. Another agency did not have expenditures in either of the quarters randomly selected; therefore, we judgmentally selected the quarters ending September 30, 2021, and March 31, 2022, to test. In total, we attempted to reconcile the 22 agency prepared CRF report templates to data in the state?s accounting system. We also attempted to reconcile the agency prepared CRF report template information to OMB?s master CRF report template and/or final submission. Lastly, we randomly sampled CRF expenditures from the agency prepared CRF report templates to test the categorical breakdown. Based on our testing, we identified: ? Approximately $61.1 million of CRF expenditures were not reported by various agencies to OMB in the proper quarter. Because material errors and omissions impacted total expenditures reported, the amounts reported by category will also be misstated. Lastly, if an error was identified or a modification needed to be made after a report was already approved by the Treasury OIG, the prime recipient was allowed to make the modification or correction in the next quarterly reporting cycle. Where sampling was performed, the audit used a non-statistical sampling method. IDENTIFICATION AS A REPEAT FINDING Not a repeat finding. RECOMMENDATION We recommend the Office of Management and Budget strengthen procedures to ensure Federal reports are complete, accurate and reconcile to the state's accounting system. OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET RESPONSE The Office of Management and Budget agrees with this finding and the auditor?s recommendation. We agree with the auditor?s finding that certain agency expenditures were not reported in the proper quarter and that quarterly reports did not reconcile to the state accounting system. However, the Federal report was required to be submitted ten days after the close of the period. The state accounting system was not closed by the time the Federal reports were required to be submitted. The U.S. Department of Treasury recognized this and directed reporting agencies to correct and revise prior submissions when each subsequent report was submitted. OMB made these revisions as required and all expenditures were reported appropriately as the final Coronavirus Relief Funds reports were submitted. See ?Management?s Response and Corrective Action? section of this report.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding: 2022-034 OMB agrees with this finding and the auditor?s recommendation. We agree with the auditor?s finding that certain agency expenditures were not reported in the proper quarter and that quarterly reports did not reconcile to the state accounting system. However, the federal report was required to be submitted ten days after the close of the period. The state accounting system was not closed by the time the federal reports were required to be submitted. The U.S. Department of Treasury recognized this and directed reporting agencies to correct and revise prior submissions when each subsequent report was submitted. OMB made these revisions as required and all expenditures were reported appropriately as the final Coronavirus Relief Funds reports were submitted. Although the CRF program is completed, in the future the Office of Management and Budget will review existing procedures to take whatever steps are reasonable to ensure federal reports are complete, accurate and reconcile to the state's accounting system. Contact Person: Joe Goplin, Director of State Financial Services Anticipated Completion Date: Not Applicable. The program is complete.

About Reporting →
2022-035
Reporting
Condition

?See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table? CONDITION The Office of Management and Budget underreported both current period and cumulative expenditures by at least $117,366,999 on the project and expenditure report to the Department of Treasury covering the period of January 2022-March 2022. These expenditures were subsequently reported in the period of April 2022-June 2022. CRITERIA The interim final rule, issued May 17, 2021, states "The quarterly Project and Expenditure reports will include financial data, information on contracts and subawards over $50,000, types of projects funded, and other information regarding a recipient?s utilization of the award funds..... Treasury will provide additional guidance and instructions on the reporting requirements outlined above for the Fiscal Recovery Funds at a later date." (Federal Register Vol. 96, No.93 pgs. 26814-26815). The final rule published January 27, 2022 which amended the interim rule also stated "Recipients are advised to also consult Treasury?s Reporting and Compliance Guidance for additional information on program administration processes and requirements, including applicability of the Uniform Guidance". Federal Register Vol. 87, No.18 pg. 4340). Per this guidance which was first published June 17, 2021, recipients were required to submit Project and Expenditure reports that included current period expenditures and cumulative expenditures for reporting periods covering March 2021-December 2021 and January 2022-March 2022. (Compliance and Reporting Guidance - State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds, V5.0 pg.17-19). The FY 2022 compliance supplement also states that the SEFA should report all aggregate expenditures for all four eligible use categories, not just the results of the revenue loss calculation or standard allowance. 2 CFR 200.303(a) states that non-Federal entities must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. CAUSE Individual agencies paid SLFRF expenditures through the state's accounting system. OMB transferred reimbursement of expenditures to the individual agencies upon request. OMB reported information on the Federal project and expenditure reports based on OMB's transfers out to agencies. OMB tracked these transfers and reported the amount tracked as current period and cumulative period expenditures for their Project and Expenditure report. Expenditures may be reported on a cash or accrual basis. Some agencies did not request a transfer for paid expenditures or provide information relating to incurred expenditures to OMB prior to the reporting period end. The State Treasurer paid approximately $92 million and the Department of Human Services paid approximately $25 million during the period that was not transferred to these agencies until after the reporting period and not reported in the period January 2022-March 2022. EFFECT The timing of expenditures made using State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF) was reported inaccurately to the Department of Treasury. CONTEXT In March 2021, the Federal Department of Treasury obligated funds to all 50 states under the State Local and Fiscal Recovery Fund to help states mitigate negative economic impacts caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. In November 2021, the special session of the 67th legislature obligated use of these funds to various agencies across the state. As the state was able to show that the revenue lost in years 2020 and 2021 exceeded the amount of the obligation from the Department of Treasury, the state was able to claim use of these funds under revenue replacement which allowed the state to utilize them for 'government operations' in addition to other specific uses and also allowing the state to report use of these funds under a single 'revenue replacement' project. The agencies began using the funds for purposes after they were obligated by the state legislature and began recording expenditures against the grant throughout our audit period. When these funds were initially disbursed to the state in March 2021, the funds were received by OMB and OMB then transferred reimbursement to agencies on request. North Dakota's project description on the reports was consistent and based on legislative appropriation. As reported, "Due to its extraordinary revenue loss during the pandemic, North Dakota?s entire SFRF allocation is dedicated to project expenditure category group 6 ? Revenue Replacement. Consequently, all expenditures will fall under project expenditure category 6.1 ? Provision of Government Services. Government services, as defined by the North Dakota legislature, includes economic development and workforce development initiatives, infrastructure and deferred maintenance initiatives, state service delivery and information technology improvements, and healthcare and emergency response initiatives." Where sampling was performed, the audit used a non-statistical sampling method. IDENTIFICATION AS A REPEAT FINDING Not a repeat finding. RECOMMENDATION We recommend the Office of Management and Budget develop corrective action and properly report the state's SLFRF current period expenditures and cumulative expenditures to the Department of Treasury as accumulated from each agency's records within the state's accounting system. OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET RESPONSE The Office of Management and Budget agrees with this finding. The expenditures referenced in this audit finding were incurred by agencies prior to the period in which the Federal funds were included in the quarterly expenditure reports for the State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund. Because OMB is responsible for the state reporting under this program, it is necessary to maintain some level of control over these funds. Consequently, OMB manages the funds centrally and developed a process to reimburse agencies for their eligible expenditures once expenditures were incurred and agencies requested reimbursement. As a result, reimbursement from the state?s allocation of SLFRF moneys always occurs after the agency expenditure. Funds are included in the Federal report for the period in which reimbursement from the SLFRF occurs. In some cases, this results in the agency expenditure occurring in a period prior to the period covered under the quarterly SLFRF report in which the reimbursement is reported. However, until reimbursement occurs, the expenditure is charged to a funding source other than SLFRF. All expenditures reimbursed through SLFRF are included in Federal reports for the period in which the reimbursement occurred. See ?Management?s Response and Corrective Action? section of this report. AUDITOR?S CONCLUDING COMMENTS While the Office of Management and Budget agrees with the finding, continuing Federal reporting based on the timing of reimbursed expenditures will likely cause further inaccurate SLFRF reporting. In addition, amounts transferred to agencies are not confirmed to not exceed incurred expenditures to ensure a reimbursement process is in place.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding: 2022-035 OMB agrees with this finding. The expenditures referenced in this audit finding were incurred by agencies prior to the period in which the federal funds were included in the quarterly expenditure reports for the State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund. Because OMB is responsible for the state reporting under this program, it is necessary to maintain some level of control over these funds. Consequently, OMB manages the funds centrally and developed a process to reimburse agencies for their eligible expenditures once expenditures were incurred and agencies requested reimbursement. As a result, reimbursement from the state?s allocation of SLFRF moneys always occurs after the agency expenditure. Funds are included in the federal report for the period in which reimbursement from the SLFRF occurs. In some cases, this results in the agency expenditure occurring in a period prior to the period covered under the quarterly SLFRF report in which the reimbursement is reported. However, until reimbursement occurs, the expenditure is charged to a funding source other than SLFRF. All expenditures reimbursed through SLFRF are included in federal reports for the period in which the reimbursement occurred. The Office of Management and Budget does not feel a corrective action plan is necessary and plans to continue federal reporting based on the timing of reimbursed expenditures for the duration of the SLFRF reporting to ensure all expenditures of SFLRF funding are accurately included in reports covering the period of reimbursement. Contact Person: Joe Goplin, Director of State Financial Services Anticipated Completion Date: Not Applicable.

About Reporting →
2022-036
Subrecipient Monitoring
MATERIAL WEAKNESS
Condition

?See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table? CONDITION The State Treasurer's Office did not ensure all required information was provided to subrecipients of Coronavirus Relief Funds (CRF). In addition, the Office's internal controls were insufficient to ensure that subrecipients received communication regarding the necessary items. Required information not communicated included: ? Subrecipient's unique entity identifier, ? Federal award identification number, ? Federal award date, ? Subaward budget period start and end date, ? Total amount of Federal funds obligated to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity including the current financial obligation, ? Total amount of Federal award committed to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity, ? Name of awarding agency, ? Assistance listing number; and, ? Indirect cost rate for Federal award including if the de minimis rate is charged. CRITERIA Federal regulation, 2 CFR 200.332(a), requires pass-through entities to communicate specific required information to subrecipients. Federal regulation, 2 CFR 200.303, requires non-Federal entities, in part, to establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. CAUSE The documents used to communicate award information to subrecipients did not contain all required items. EFFECT These required communications are intended to help subrecipients meet all their reporting requirements, and to meet all award terms. Subrecipients subject to Single Audits also need this information for their audits. CONTEXT The State Treasurer's Office was appropriated approximately $123.3 million of funds from the Coronavirus Relief Fund (CRF) to be distributed to local governments. Almost all the funding was allocated to cities and counties based on salary and benefit expenses for licensed law enforcement officers since Federal guidance allowed for CRF funding to be used to reimburse law enforcement payroll costs. The Director of the Office of Management and Budget sent out an email to the North Dakota Association of Counties and to the North Dakota League of Cities to be forwarded to city and county leaders that indicated such funding was available. A Certification Law Enforcement Payroll Reimbursement Form was attached to the email. The combined information provided in the body of the email and the certification form did not contain all required items. Where sampling was performed, the audit used a non-statistical sampling method. IDENTIFICATION AS A REPEAT FINDING Not a repeat finding. RECOMMENDATION We recommend the State Treasurer's Office: A) Communicate all required information of 2 CFR 200.332(a) to subrecipients. B) Develop procedures to ensure that all Coronavirus Relief Fund award information is communicated to subrecipients. OFFICE OF STATE TREASURER RESPONSE The Office of State Treasurer does agree with finding that we were not in compliance with Federal regulations related to providing required information to subrecipients of Coronavirus Relief Funds (CRF). See ?Management?s Response and Corrective Action? section of this report.

Corrective Action Plan

Office of State Treasurer Finding: 2022-036 Office of State Treasurer Response/Corrective Action Plan: The Office of State Treasurer does agree with finding that we were not in compliance with federal regulations related to providing required information to subrecipients of Coronavirus Relief Funds (CRF). Corrective action planned: 1. The Office of State Treasurer will work with ND Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to communicate to subrecipients timely and create a template for future use that includes the required information that was missed as detailed on the schedule of federal findings and questions costs. 2. The Office of State Treasurer has discussed with OMB that the information will not be recommunicated to the subrecipients as OMB has been in contact with subrecipients in guiding them to necessary information and assisting with any needs. It has been determined that communicating the information retroactively would cause more confusion and issues among the subrecipients. Contact Person: Nicole Krivoruchka Director of Finance Anticipated Completion Date September 3, 2023

About Subrecipient Monitoring →
2022-037
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability
QUESTIONED COSTS
Condition

?See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table? CONDITION The Office of State Treasurer over-reimbursed a county for law enforcement payroll by $4,000. The amount of the overpayment is considered the total known questioned cost. This overpayment error, projected to the entire population, results in an additional possible error of $29,603. CRITERIA According to the Federal Register dated January 15, 2021, The CARES Act provides that payments from the Fund may only be used to cover costs that: 1. are necessary expenditures incurred due to the public health emergency with respect to the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID?19); 2. were not accounted for in the budget most recently approved as of March 27, 2020 (the date of enactment of the CARES Act) for the State or government; and 3. were incurred during the period that begins on March 1, 2020, and ends on December 31, 2021. In addition, Federal Register indicates the Treasury has provided, as an administrative accommodation, that a State, local, or tribal government may presume that public health and safety employees meet the substantially dedicated test unless the relevant government determines that specific circumstances indicate otherwise. All costs of such employees may be covered using payments for services provided during the period that begins on March 1, 2020, and ends on December 31, 2021. CAUSE A county overstated its payroll costs by $4,000 on the CARES Act Coronavirus Relief Fund Eligibility Certification Law Enforcement Payroll Reimbursement form submitted to the ND Office of Management and Budget. In addition, subrecipient monitoring procedures did not identify this subrecipient as high risk (steady monthly payroll and immaterial amount provided in total to the subrecipient). EFFECT The Office of State Treasurer was not in compliance with Federal regulations as an overpayment is not an allowable use of Federal funds. CONTEXT The Office of State Treasurer was appropriated Coronavirus Relief Fund monies to provide payments to cities, counties, and other political subdivisions. Such payments were primarily related to reimbursing cities and counties for law enforcement payroll costs incurred between March 1, 2020 to December 31, 2020. Our testing of Coronavirus Relief Fund program expenditures, identified one error from a sample size of 40 out of a possible 461 payments. The error was an overpayment to a county of $4,000 for law enforcement payroll costs. This overpayment, projected to the entire population of $123,322,297, resulted in an additional possible error of $29,603. However, since the State's program ended December 31, 2020, the cities and counties with known or projected likely questioned costs would have until December 31, 2021, to incur allowable program expenditures to offset any questions costs. Where sampling was performed, the audit used a non-statistical sampling method. IDENTIFICATION AS A REPEAT FINDING Not a repeat finding. RECOMMENDATION We recommend the Office of State Treasurer: A) Request support from the county for allowable expenditures incurred during the period beginning March 1, 2020, and ending on December 31, 2021, to offset the overpayment; or B) Recoup the overpayment from the county and refund the Department of the Treasury. OFFICE OF STATE TREASURER RESPONSE The Office of State Treasurer does agree with finding that we were not in compliance with Federal regulations as an overpayment to the county for reimbursement for law enforcement payroll is not an allowable use of Federal funds. See ?Management?s Response and Corrective Action? section of this report.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding: 2022-037 Office of State Treasurer Response/Corrective Action Plan: The Office of State Treasurer does agree with finding that we were not in compliance with federal regulations as an overpayment to the county for reimbursement for law enforcement payroll is not an allowable use of federal funds. The corrective action plan as follows: 1. The Office of State Treasurer will work with ND Office of Management and Budget to determine county contact information and any prior data requested to keep records consistent. 2. The Office of State Treasurer will contact the county to request support from the county supporting allowable expenditures incurred during the period beginning March 1, 2020 and ending on December 31, 2021 to offset the overpayment as stated in recommendation A on the Schedule of Federal Findings and Questioned Costs sent to the Office of State Treasurer on February 9, 2023. Contact Person: Nicole Krivoruchka Director of Finance Anticipated Completion Date: March 23, 2023

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2020-06-30

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on March 17, 2021. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by September 17, 2021, which was (1798 days ago).

What is a management decision? →
2020-001
Other
Condition

See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table CRITERIA 2 CFR 200.510(b)(1-6), states that the grantee is responsible for the accurate preparation of the Schedule of Federal Awards. According to "Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government" quality information needs to be communicated to enable personnel to perform key roles in achieving the entities objectives. (GAO-14.704G paragraphs 14.02 and 14.03) CONDITION The Department of Commerce does not have proper controls in place to ensure accuracy of the data that is included on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA). The following was noted on the fiscal year 2019 SEFA: ? An independent review was not performed on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards. ? The total amount of expenditures was overstated by $11.2 million. Of that amount: o The Community Development Block Grant program was overstated by $5.5 million. o The Community Services Block Grant program was overstated by $3.2 million. o The HOME Investment Partnerships Program was overstated by $3.1 million. o The Weatherization Assistance for Low-Income Persons was overstated by $2.5 million CAUSE Due to employee turnover, inexperienced staff prepared the SEFA without supervisory review EFFECT Inaccurate information was initially reported in the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards and detected and corrected through the audit. CONTEXT Incorrect expenditures reported on the fiscal year 2019 SEFA totaled $11.2 million and affected 14 programs. For fiscal year 2019, 100% (2 out of 2) of the Federal programs reviewed as major programs had incorrect expenditure amounts reported on the SEFA. These 2 programs made up 53% ($8.2 million) of the overall total corrected Federal expenditures ($14.7 million) listed on the Department of Commerce's SEFA for fiscal year 2019. RECOMMENDATION We recommend the Department of Commerce accurately prepare and perform an independent review of the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE RESPONSE/CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN See ?Management?s Response and Corrective Action? section of this report.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding: 2020-001 Department of Commerce Response/Corrective Action Plan: The Department of Commerce agrees with the recommendation and will ensure accurate preparation of the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards and the schedule will be reviewed by the Lead Fiscal Officer before being submitted. Contact Person: Celeste Engelhard, Lead Fiscal Officer Anticipated Completion Date: We immediately put our corrective action plan into place. The 2020 SEFA was completed and reviewed before being submitted to the Office of Management and Budget.

About Other →
2020-002
Eligibility
REPEATQUESTIONED COSTS
Condition

See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table CRITERIA 42 CFR 431.10 states the State Medicaid Agency or its designee is required to determine client eligibility in accordance with eligibility requirements defined in the approved State plan. 42 CFR 435.603 (a)(2) states that the agency must apply the financial methodologies set forth in this section in determining the financial eligibility of all individuals for Medicaid. 42 CFR 457.965 states the State must include in each applicant's record facts to support the State's determination of the applicant's eligibility for CHIP. 45 CFR 75.303 states that the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. CONDITION During our testing of eligibility, we noted that eligibility was not properly determined by the Department of Human Services (DHS) in the Children's Health Insurance Program and Medicaid. DHS did not properly determine eligibility in 4 of 60 Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP) cases reviewed. Each of the cases were missing either income verifications, a narrative to support determinations, or both. The errors resulted in improper payments totaling $4,659. When projected against the entire population, the likely questioned costs total $1,119,228. DHS did not properly determine eligibility in 1 of the 60 Medicaid cases reviewed due to a lack of updated income information on the individual. As a result, auditor was unable to determine if the individual should have been eligible for Medicaid or not. The error resulted in an improper payment totaling $123. When projected against the entire population, the likely questioned costs total $695,468. The Department's Quality Control Unit did their own review and also identified eligibility determination errors as noted below. The eligibility testing required by Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) performed by the Department's Quality Control Unit for the calendar year 2019 for the Medicaid program identified 14 of the 200 active cases tested had eligibility determination errors, an error rate of 7%. While 35 out of the 200 negative cases tested had eligibility determination errors, an error rate of 17.5%. The eligibility testing required by Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) performed by the Department's Quality Control Unit for the calendar year 2019 for the Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP) identified 27 of the 200 active cases tested had eligibility determination errors, an error rate of 13.5%. While 28 out of the 200 negative cases tested had eligibility determination errors, an error rate of 14%. Due to the public health emergency (Covid-19) CMS has changed its requirements for the payment review portion of active cases. It is no longer required to determine payment error amounts. As a result, we are unable to identify improper Federal payment amounts for the eligibility errors of the Department's Quality Control Unit testing. CAUSE The Department is not documenting how the amount of income was determined. Also, the Department is relying on applicants to provide updated income when there are changes in employment status. These employment changes are not communicated timely to the Department. The Department verifies income with North Dakota Job Service periodically, but between income verifications the applicant is required to provide updated information when income changes. EFFECT Unallowable payments were made to providers on behalf of individuals whose eligibility for the CHIP and Medicaid was not proper. CONTEXT There were 126,060 CHIP and Medicaid cases that received over $2.6 billion in payments for fiscal years ended June 30, 2019 and 2020. IDENTIFICATION AS A REPEAT FINDING Finding 2018-002 and 2018-006 were reported in the immediate prior year. Finding 2016-004 and 2016-016 were made in previous years. RECOMMENDATION We recommend the Department of Human Services ensure eligibility determinations made for the Medicaid and CHIP programs are proper. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES RESPONSE/CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN See ?Management?s Response and Corrective Action? section of this report.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding: 2020-002 Department of Human Services Response/Corrective Action Plan: The Department of Human Services agrees with the recommendation. The Medicaid Policy Unit has implemented ELearning training that is mandatory for all Medicaid Eligibility Workers. ? The Training Modules are as follows: ? Electronic Data Sources ? Documentation & Narratives ? Common Eligibility Errors: Income ? Common Eligibility Errors: Household Composition ? Non-ACA Reviews ? TPL The system error related to Defect 158460 has since been implemented which fixed the issue in SPACES. The PaSS Unit provides ongoing training for eligibility workers. Contact Person: Joyce Johnson, Medical Policy Director and Juli Johnson, Medicaid Policy Administrator Anticipated Completion Date: Completed

Prior Finding References

2018-002, 2018-006

About Eligibility →
2020-003
Reporting
Condition

See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table CRITERIA 45 CFR 75.303 states that the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. CONDITION The Department of Human Services (DHS) is not completing a reconciliation between PeopleSoft, the state?s accounting system, and the Quarterly Children?s Health Insurance Program Statement of Expenditures for Title XXI report (CMS-21 Report). DHS also did not complete a reconciliation between PeopleSoft and the grant expenditures reported on the Quarterly Statement of Expenditures for the Medical Assistance Program (CMS-64 Report). For both of these reports, the two quarters tested for each report did not have reconciliations completed. CAUSE The reconciliations were not completed primarily due to turnover in staff. EFFECT There is risk of fiscal year-end financial reporting being inaccurate if reconciliations between the Federal report and PeopleSoft are not completed as it could potentially misstate the reporting on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards. The auditors' testing of CMS reports did not identify any significant errors in financial reporting. CONTEXT CHIP expenditures were $46,531,367 during the audit period. After the auditor inquired about reconciliations, DHS did complete reconciliations for both grant and admin expenditures. No errors were noted. Medicaid grant expenditures were $1,451,818,930 during the audit period. Admin expenditures were reconciled and are not included in this expenditure amount. RECOMMENDATION We recommend the Department of Human Services perform reconciliations between the Federal reports and PeopleSoft on a consistent basis. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES RESPONSE/CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN See ?Management?s Response and Corrective Action? section of this report.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding: 2020-003 Department of Human Services Response/Corrective Action Plan: The Department of Human Services (DHS) agrees with the recommendation. DHS has now filled the vacant Medicaid Accountant position. This position will be responsible to complete the administrative portion of the Quarterly Children?s Health Insurance Program Statement of Expenditures for Title XXI report (CMS-21 Report). Part of the quarterly reporting process will be to reconcile the amounts reported to PeopleSoft, as the PeopleSoft system is the system of record for DHS administrative expenses. As noted above DHS did not perform the reconciliation?s timely due to turnover in staff but reconciliations were provided once requested and no errors were noted. DHS anticipates reconciliation?s will be done timely since the position has been filled. The Medical Assistance expenditures reported on the Quarterly Statement of Expenditures for the Medical Assistance Program (MAP) (CMS-64 Report) are based on payment data from MMIS. This data is summarized and grouped according to CMS reporting requirements. MAP expenditure data at this detail does not exist in PeopleSoft, therefore the PeopleSoft system is not used for federal reporting, however part of the federal reporting process includes balancing PeopleSoft check write amounts to MMIS 64 reports generated from MMIS. DHS wishes to clarify that there is not a risk of federal reporting being inaccurate for the MAP if reconciliations between the federal report and PeopleSoft are not completed. MMIS is the system of record for federal reporting and calculations for collection adjustment are part of the federal reporting process and can only made in PeopleSoft once the federal reporting process is complete. DHS will ensure timely adjustments are made to PeopleSoft to ensure MAP expenditure amounts reported on the CMS-64 are properly reflected in PeopleSoft, this will also ensure that fiscal year-end financial reporting is reflective of what has been reported, and therefore reduce the risk of misstatement on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards. Contact Person: Rhonda Obrigewitch, Assistant CFO Anticipated Completion Date: September 2021

About Reporting →
2020-004
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability
REPEATQUESTIONED COSTS
Condition

See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table CRITERIA 45 CFR 75.403 states that in order to be allowable under Federal awards, a cost must be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award. Duplicate payments are neither necessary nor reasonable. 45 CFR 75.303 states that the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. CONDITION Sixty potential duplicate payments were tested from the Medicaid Management Information System (MMIS). Testing identified 10 of these were duplicate payments from MMIS. CAUSE The Department does not have proper procedures in place to detect and prevent duplicate or improper payments from being issued EFFECT The known unallowable costs charged to the program were $8,460 and when projected against the entire population, the likely questioned costs were $74,776. CONTEXT 632 sets of duplicates totaling $2.1 million were identified as potential duplicate payments. IDENTIFICATION AS A REPEAT FINDING Finding 2018-005 was reported in the immediate prior year. Finding 2016-008 was made in the previous year. RECOMMENDATION We recommend the Department of Human Services strengthen procedures and controls to prevent duplicate payments. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES RESPONSE/CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN See ?Management?s Response and Corrective Action? section of this report.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding: 2020-004 Department of Human Services Response/Corrective Action Plan: The Department of Human Services agrees with the recommendation. The Department will implement additional editing in MMIS during the claim adjudication process prior to claims payment to enhance the identification of potential duplicate payments. During the next year, the Department will review at least quarterly whether additional editing may be necessary to enhance the identification of potential duplicate payments. Contact Person: Caprice Knapp, Medicaid Director Anticipated Completion Date: March 31, 2022

Prior Finding References

2018-005

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →
2020-005
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability
QUESTIONED COSTS
Condition

See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table CRITERIA 42 CFR 431.960 (c) (1) states a medical review error is an error resulting in an overpayment or underpayment that is determined from a review of the provider's medical record or other documentation supporting the service(s) claimed, Code of Federal Regulations that are applicable to conditions of payment, the State's written policies, and a comparison between the documentation and written policies and the information presented on the claim resulting in Federal and/or State improper payments. 42 CFR 431.960 (c) (3) states medical review errors include, but are not limited to, the following: (i) lack of documentation, (ii) insufficient documentation, and (iii) procedure coding errors. CONDITION Medicaid providers submitted claims for payments for which the provider did not retain the required documentation to support the service billed in 6 of 382 claims tested. This resulted in improper payments of $231. When projected against the entire population, the likely questioned costs totaled $4,999,047. The Department of Human Service completed Medicaid adjustments that were not coded correctly in 2 of the 120 claim adjustments tested. This resulted in improper adjustments of $262. When projected against the entire population, the likely questioned costs totaled $101,665. CAUSE Medicaid providers did not retain proper documentation to support Medicaid claims and claim adjustments. In addition, the Department did not ensure providers were coding claims and adjustments properly. EFFECT Unallowable or inaccurate payments and adjustments were made to providers without proper documentation. CONTEXT There were 121,684 individuals that were Medicaid eligible during our audit period of July 1, 2018, through June 30, 2020. RECOMMENDATION We recommend Department of Human Services ensure providers retain the proper documentation and are coding claims correctly for Medicaid claims and adjustments. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES RESPONSE/CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN See ?Management?s Response and Corrective Action? section of this report.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding: 2020-005 Department of Human Services Response/Corrective Action Plan: The Department of Human Services agrees with the recommendation. The Department will provide education to providers on the requirement to retain documentation to support the services billed. The Department will also provide education to providers on the necessity to provide the requested documentation for a records request. Contact Person: Caprice Knapp, Medicaid Director Anticipated Completion Date: June 30, 2021

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →
2020-006
Special Tests & Provisions
REPEATQUESTIONED COSTS
Condition

See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table CRITERIA 42 CFR 456.5 The agency must establish and use written criteria for evaluating the appropriateness and quality of Medicaid services. This section does not apply to services in hospitals and mental hospitals. For these facilities, see the following sections: 456.122 and 456.132 of subpart C; and 456.232 of subpart D. The North Dakota Program Integrity Unit Audit Oversight outlines the type and frequency of audits to be performed. CONDITION The Department of Human Services Program Integrity Unit did not fully execute their audit oversight document for the Medicaid Program. Per the audit oversight document the new rehabilitation provider audit and the recipient analysis are to be completed semi-annually. The new rehabilitation provider audit was scheduled to start in the first quarter of calendar year 2019, however, it was never completed and it was determined to discontinue these audits. While the recipient analysis was completed during the second half of calendar year 2018 and all of calendar year 2019, it had not been completed yet for calendar year 2020. Additionally, the ambulance audits are to be conducted on a weekly basis. While the ambulance audits were completed for most of calendar years 2018 and 2019, there were no reviews completed for December 2018 and audits stopped after February 2020. CAUSE The new rehabilitation provider audit was not completed due to the lack of time and resources as well as upper management?s decision to focus on audits that have a bigger fiscal impact. The semi-annual recipient analysis was not completed for 2020 as the compliance technician was new to the position and due to a lack of communication did not realize they needed to complete the analysis. The ambulance reviews have not been completed since February 2020 due to the changing of staff and procedures. EFFECT The audits completed as required by the Audit Oversight document are the primary process to identify improper use of Medicaid funds. If the audits are not being completed timely, individuals could be misusing Medicaid funds. CONTEXT The Recipient Analysis and New Rehabilitation Provider Audits are required, by the Audit Oversight document, to be performed once every six months. Additionally, Ambulance Audits are required by the Audit Oversight document to be performed weekly. The Department did not perform all of these required reviews timely during the audit period. IDENTIFICATION AS A REPEAT FINDING Finding 2018-003 was reported in the immediate prior year. Findings 2016-003, 2014-002, 2012-003 were made in previous years. RECOMMENDATION We recommend the Department of Human Services ensure the Program Integrity Unit fully executes their Audit Oversight policy. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES RESPONSE/CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN See ?Management?s Response and Corrective Action? section of this report.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding: 2020-006 Department of Human Services Response/Corrective Action Plan: The Department of Human Services agrees with the recommendation. The Program Integrity Unit has revised the language in the Audit Overview Oversight document to better reflect the new rehabilitation provider process. It is not a formal audit but rather an educational review process meant to assist the providers in billing correctly. The Program Integrity Unit has reassigned the layperson ambulance reviews to the Utilization Review team due to no longer having a layperson in the PIU. The PIU will pull the applicable claims data for the UR team to conduct the review. Prior to reassigning to the UR team, a temporary enrollment staff helped get the late ambulance claim reviews caught up. Requests for the sample of ambulance claims for 4th quarter 2020 went out and we are currently receiving responses and are current with the reviews. The semi-annual recipient analysis for first half of 2020 was completed in October of 2020. The second half of 2020 will be reviewed this month. Due to the declaration of the Public Health Emergency as of March 2020, State Medicaid Agencies were encouraged to halt auditing to allow healthcare facilities to focus on treating patients associated with the pandemic. Contact Person: Dawn Mock, Medicaid Program Integrity Administrator Anticipated Completion Date: Completed

Prior Finding References

2018-003

About Special Tests and Provisions →
2020-007
Special Tests & Provisions
QUESTIONED COSTS
Condition

See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs fpr chart/table CRITERIA NCCI Medicaid Technical Guidance Manual Section 7.1.2 states at a minimum, the following elements must be included in the confidentiality agreements for any contracted party using the Medicaid NCCI files posted to the Medicaid Integrity Institute: ? Disclosure shall be limited to only those responsible for the implementation of the quarterly state Medicaid NCCI edit files. Disclosure shall not be made prior to the start of the new calendar quarter. ? After the start of the new calendar quarter, a Contracted Party may disclose only non-confidential information contained in the Medicaid NCCI edit files that is also available to the general public found on the Medicaid NCCI webpage. ? The Contracted Party agrees to use any non-public information from the quarterly state Medicaid NCCI edit files only for any business purposes directly related to the implementation of the Medicaid NCCI methodologies in the particular state. ? New, revised, or deleted Medicaid NCCI edits shall not be published or otherwise shared with individuals, medical societies, or any other entities unless it is a Contracted Party prior to the posting of the Medicaid NCCI edits on the Medicaid NCCI webpage. ? Implementation of New, revised, or deleted Medicaid NCCI edits shall not occur prior to the first day of the calendar quarter. ? Only a state Medicaid agency has the discretion to release additional information for selected individual edits or limited ranges of edits from the files posted on the Medicaid Integrity Institute. ? State Medicaid agencies must impose penalties, up to and including loss of contract, for violations of any confidentiality agreement relating to use of the MII edit files. CONDITION The Department of Human Services does not have a confidentiality agreement in place with Cotiviti in regards to the NCCI. Medicaid National Correct Coding Initiative (NCCI) methodologies must be applied to Medicaid fee-for-service claims submitted with, and reimbursed on the basis of, Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System codes and Current Procedural Terminology codes. The NCCI files are to be updated on a quarterly basis as required by the Medicaid Integrity Institute. The Department of Human Services contracts with Cotiviti to implement the correct quarterly files from Medicaid Integrity Institute. The NCCI Medicaid Technical Guidance Manual requires a confidentiality agreement to be in place for any contracted party using the Medicaid NCCI files. CAUSE The Department of Human Services was unaware of the requirement to have a confidentiality agreement EFFECT The lack of a confidentiality agreement with Cotiviti could result in Cotiviti using non-public information from the quarterly state Medicaid NCCI edit files for non-business purposes without any penalties being imposed. Additionally, the lack of a confidentiality agreement with Cotiviti could lead to Cotiviti not updating the quarterly files timely. CONTEXT There were 121,684 individuals that were Medicaid eligible during our audit period of July 1, 2018, through June 30, 2020 that had claims being processed by the Department of Human Services through Cotiviti. RECOMMENDATION We recommend the Department of Human Services ensure a confidentiality agreement is in place with Cotiviti in regards to National Correct Coding Initiative. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES RESPONSE/CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN See ?Management?s Response and Corrective Action? section of this report.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding: 2020-007 Department of Human Services Response/Corrective Action Plan: The Department agrees with the recommendation and will sign an amendment to the Cotiviti contract which will meet the requirements of the confidentiality agreement in Section 7.1.2 of the Medicaid National Correct Coding Initiative Technical Guidance Manual, revised 01/01/2020. Contact Person: Caprice Knapp, Medicaid Director Anticipated Completion Date: March 2021

About Special Tests and Provisions →
2020-008
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability
Condition

See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table CRITERIA Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government (Green Book) requires management to monitor the effectiveness of internal control over the assigned processes performed by service organizations. Monitoring activities related to service organizations may include the use of work performed by external parties. (GAO-14-704G para 16.08) 45 CFR 75.303 states that the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. 2 CFR 200.303(e) states that the non-Federal entity must take reasonable measures to safeguard protected personally identifiable information and other information the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity designates as sensitive or the non-Federal entity considers sensitive consistent with applicable Federal, state, local, and tribal laws regarding privacy and obligations of confidentiality. AU-C Section 402.08 "Audit Considerations Relating to an Entity Using a Service Organization" defines a services organization as an organization that provides services to user entities that are relevant to those user entities' internal control over financial reporting. CONDITION The Department of Human Services contracts with Health Management Systems to exchange Medicaid recipients information to inquire if those recipients maintain third party liability/health insurance coverage. The Department of Human Services exchanges personal recipient information, however, has not received a System and Organization Controls (SOC) report for Health Management System (HMS) since 2018, which was for the time frame of March 1, 2017 to February 28, 2018. The Child Support Division also participates in the contract with HMS to look for hits in the national health insurance database applicable to eligible child support individuals for potential 3rd party liability. CAUSE The HMS contract expired on September 30, 2017. Following procurement procedures, the new contract was established with HMS. After the contract was reprocured, there was miscommunication among Department of Human Services personnel on whether a SOC report was required or not with the current contract. EFFECT The lack of a SOC report for HMS, could lead to the Department of Human Services exchanging Medicaid recipients' and eligible child support individuals' information with an outside service organization with potential control weaknesses to protect personal information. CONTEXT There were 121,684 individuals that were Medicaid eligible during our audit period of July 1, 2018, through June 30, 2020. In addition, the Child Support Division submits a monthly extract file to HMS which contains approximately 50,000 children for whom there is an order for support. This extract file could include social security numbers for the children, custodial parents, and noncustodial parents. RECOMMENDATION We recommend the Department of Human Services ensures SOC reports are obtained on all outside service organizations on a regular, consistent basis. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES RESPONSE/CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN See ?Management?s Response and Corrective Action? section of this report.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding: 2020-008 Department of Human Services Response/Corrective Action Plan: The Department agrees with the recommendation. The Department?s Program will continue to request a SOC audit from HMS. Contact Person: Cody Hedge, Paralegal at Child Support Anticipated Completion Date: January 2021

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →
2020-009
Special Tests & Provisions
REPEATMATERIAL WEAKNESS
Condition

See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table CRITERIA 45 CFR 98.41(1)(i)(A) states lead agencies shall assure that children receiving services under the CCDF are age-appropriately immunized. Those health and safety provisions shall incorporate the latest recommendation for childhood immunization of the respective state. Lead agencies may exempt: (1) Children who are cared for by relatives, provided there are no other unrelated children who are cared for in the same setting. (2) Children who receive care in their own homes, provided there are no other unrelated children who are cared for in the home. (3) Children whose parents object to immunization on religious grounds. (4) Children whose medical condition contraindicates immunization. 45 CFR 98.41(iv) requires prevention and response to emergencies due to food and allergic reactions. Allergic reactions are identified on the Statement of Health for each individual child. 45 CFR 98.41 states that lead agencies must certify that procedures are in effect to ensure that child care providers, for which assistance is provided under the Child Care Assistance Program, comply with all applicable health and safety requirements. North Dakota Century Code section 50-11.1-07 requires a licensee to maintain records as the Department prescribes regarding each child, and shall report to the Department or the Department's authorized agent, when requested, upon forms furnished by the Department, facts the Department may require with reference to each child. CONDITION The Department of Human Services does not ensure that child care providers have records for enrolled children as identified by Federal health and safety requirements. Required records include immunization records and a statement of health for each child enrolled with the provider. Of 83 licenses tested, 27 were either missing records or did not have documentation identifying records were reviewed during the licensing process resulting in a 33% error rate. CAUSE Department approval of child care licenses does not include verification that county licensors reviewed required child care records and ensured missing documentation was obtained. EFFECT Children could be at risk due to unidentified health concerns. CONTEXT During fiscal year 2017 and 2018, there were 2,174 licensed providers that received payments totaling $29.4 million. IDENTIFICATION AS A REPEAT FINDING Finding 2018-007 was reported in the immediate prior year. RECOMMENDATION We recommend the Department of Human Services develop procedures to ensure required child care records are maintained by the child care provider. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES RESPONSE/CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN See ?Management?s Response and Corrective Action? section of this report.

Corrective Action Plan

See Corrective Action Plan for chart/table Finding: 2020-009 Department of Human Services Response/Corrective Action Plan: The Department of Human Services agrees with the recommendation. Early Childhood Services has received Technical Assistance from the regional office (OCC) regarding childcare records. Their recommendations according to CCDF requirements, were to update our compliance checklist (see below) and to eliminate the childcare record (SFN 1426) which is not a required form. All specialists will be using the updated compliance checklist by May of 2021. Contact Person: Carmen Traeholt, Early Childhood Services Statewide Manager Anticipated Completion Date: May 2021

Prior Finding References

2018-007

About Special Tests and Provisions →
2020-010
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability
REPEATQUESTIONED COSTS
Condition

See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table CRITERIA North Dakota Administrative Code 75-02-01.3-10 states that the caretaker of each eligible child who receives or is offered child care services for which financial assistance is provided through the child care and development fund may choose the approved relative provider, registrant, holder of a self-declaration, or licensed provider of services to that child. Department of Human Services Child Care Assistance Policy Manual section 400-28-105-25 states that the household's provider must be licensed (including military, tribal and out-of state), self-declared, or an approved relative provider. The license must be current and have an expiration date later than the date of the Child Care Assistance Provider's application. 45 CFR 75.303 states that the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. CONDITION The Department of Human Services issued Child Care Assistance payments to providers that were improperly licensed. The Department requires that an individual is either an approved relative, self-declared, or licensed child care provider in order to receive payments. 27 of 83 provider licenses reviewed were determined to be improperly licensed, an error rate of 33%. These providers received $34,782 in payments during the period of improper licensure. These known questioned costs were not projected to the population as not all improperly licensed providers received child care assistance payments during the period of being improperly licensed. CAUSE The Department has not designed consistent procedures to ensure licensing applications include all required documents. In addition, they rely on the licensing process and do not perform sufficient independent verifications that payments are issued to properly licensed providers. EFFECT Payments are being issued to child care providers that may not be eligible to receive them. CONTEXT During fiscal year 2017 and 2018, there were 2,174 licensed providers that received payments totaling $29.4 million. IDENTIFICATION AS A REPEAT FINDING Finding 2018-010 was reported in the immediate prior year. Finding 2016-021 was made in the previous year. RECOMMENDATION We recommend the Department of Human Services ensure that child care providers have met all necessary licensing requirements prior to issuing Child Care Assistance payments. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES RESPONSE/CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN See ?Management?s Response and Corrective Action? section of this report.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding: 2020-010 Department of Human Services Response/Corrective Action Plan: The Department of Human Services agrees with the recommendation. The State initiated a process redesign for early childhood licensing in August 2019. The redesign was intended to improve consistency of reviews, ongoing monitoring, and corrective action across all 19 Human Service Zones. The bulk of the redesign work took place in advance of the former county-employed early childhood licensors becoming state employees (January 2020). As part of Redesign, DHS piloted the use of a streamlined on-site visit checklist to identify opportunities for efficiencies. Thirteen counties utilized the abbreviated form during pilot, the remaining counties continued to utilize the existing form. It was determined that the abbreviated form would not adequately capture information needed so, in June 2020 all licensors reverted to utilization of the full-length Compliance Checklist to assure all Health and Safety standards are being met. In September 2020 DHS began the work of implementing a comprehensive Early Childhood Licensing database that will greatly improve the ability to properly license providers. The system is anticipated to be complete by March 2022. Contact Person: Carmen Traeholt, Early Childhood Services Statewide Manager Anticipated Completion Date: March 2022

Prior Finding References

2018-010

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →
2020-011
Special Tests & Provisions
REPEAT
Condition

See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table CRITERIA North Dakota Century Code (NDCC) section 50-11.1-07.2 requires that the Department or the Department's authorized agency issue a correction order whenever it is determined upon inspection that a program or premises is not in compliance with this chapter or rules adopted under this chapter. NDCC section 50-11.1-07.3 requires the Department or the Department's authorized agent shall re-inspect an early childhood program issued a correction order under NDCC section 50-11.1-07.2, at the end of the period allowed for correction. 45 CFR 98.41 requires that lead agencies must certify that procedures are in effect to ensure that providers serving children who receive subsidies comply with all applicable health and safety requirements. 45 CFR 75.303 states that the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. CONDITION The Department of Human Services is not properly monitoring corrective orders issued to child care providers and performing re-inspections of identified deficiencies within specified time frames. Fifty-two of 520 (10%) corrective orders issued during our audit period did not identify a date the orders were determined to be corrected. In addition, 163 of 520 (31%) corrective orders were not re-inspected within the 24 hour, 20 day, or 60 day time frame allowed for correction. CAUSE The Department's procedures for monitoring the resolution of corrective orders is ineffective. EFFECT Child care providers are operating without proper follow up of corrective orders jeopardizing the health and safety of children. In addition, the Department is not ensuring providers are meeting health and safety requirements as required by 45 CFR section 98.41. CONTEXT During fiscal years 2019 and 2020, there were 1,944 licensed providers receiving payments from the Child Care Assistance program. The following list is the number of corrective orders issued by calendar year: 2020 - 70 (through July) 2019 ? 314 2018 ? 136 IDENTIFICATION AS A REPEAT FINDING Finding 2018-013 was reported in the immediate prior year. Finding 2016-026 was made in the previous year. RECOMMENDATION We recommend the Department of Human Services develop procedures to monitor and ensure the resolution of corrective orders including that resolution occurs within specified time frames. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES RESPONSE/CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN See ?Management?s Response and Corrective Action? section of this report.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding: 2020-011 Department of Human Services Response/Corrective Action Plan: The Department agrees with the recommendation. During the audit timeframe, County Licensors were inconsistent in how they followed up on corrective orders. As part of Early Childhood Services Redesign (completed by March 2020), all Licensing Specialists are assigned a specific provider case load, which will help Licensing Specialists keep track of any correction orders and follow-up expectations that affect providers they are assigned to work with. Contact Person: Carmen Traeholt, Early Childhood Services Statewide Manager Anticipated Completion Date: March 2021

Prior Finding References

2018-013

About Special Tests and Provisions →
2020-012
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability
REPEATQUESTIONED COSTS
Condition

See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table CRITERIA 45 CFR 75.403 states that in order to be allowable under Federal awards, a cost must be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award. Duplicate payments are neither necessary nor reasonable. 45 CFR 75.303 states that the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. CONDITION The Department of Human Services issued duplicate and other improper payments to child care providers receiving payments from the Child Care Assistance program. We tested 60 payments and identified $1,347 of improper payments. These errors projected to the remaining population of potential duplicate payments, would result in additional likely questioned costs of $4,113. The identified circumstances are as follows: ? 3 Duplicate payments were made due to a system defect in SPACES that caused a second payment to be paid for 3 cases. This resulted in duplicate payments of $859. ? 7 Duplicate payment were made when a case worker did not notice that a payment had already been sent out. This resulted in duplicate payment of $488. CAUSE The Department does not have proper procedures in place to detect and prevent duplicate or improper payments from being issued. EFFECT The Department issued payments that were not allowable under the Child Care Development Block Grant. CONTEXT The audit identified 1,031 potential duplicate payments totaling $147,251 during the audit period. 10 out of the 60 potential duplicate payments tested were errors totaling $1,347. IDENTIFICATION AS A REPEAT FINDING Finding 2018-011 was reported in the immediate prior year. Finding 2016-022 was made in the previous year. RECOMMENDATION We recommend the Department of Human Services develop and implement procedures to detect and prevent duplicate and other improper payments from being issued under the Child Care Assistance program. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES RESPONSE/CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN See ?Management?s Response and Corrective Action? section of this report.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding: 2020-012 Department of Human Services Response/Corrective Action Plan: The Department of Human Services agrees with the recommendation. The Lead Agency receives a monthly report that contains payments that could be considered duplicate that were made for three months prior to the current month. The report contains payments that meet the following criteria: ? Same child ? Same caretaker ? Same provider ? Same service month Department staff reviews identified payments on this report and maintains a log and notes on each situation and any follow up that was completed with Eligibility workers. The consolidated eligibility system, SPACES, where payments are issued, does have checks validations in place to ensure payments to no exceed the state maximum rate. An additional warning message is in place and is received when a payment already exists for the child and provider for a service month and a new payment with the same criteria is entered. Workers are able to by-pass this warning message as there are instances where a second payment may be needed. The department will explore a system enhancement to make this warning message more prominent in an effort to reduce duplicate payment situations. Contact Person: Emily Hakanson, Child Care Assistance Program Administrator Anticipated Completion Date: There is no anticipated completion date for system enhancements as all enhancements have to be prioritized and scheduled based on need.

Prior Finding References

2018-011

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →
2020-013
Eligibility
REPEATQUESTIONED COSTS
Condition

See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table CRITERIA 45 CFR 98.68(c) states that lead agencies must have procedures in place for documenting and verifying eligibility. 45 CFR 98.45(k) states that lead agencies shall establish a sliding fee scale, based on family size, income, and other appropriate factors, that provides for cost sharing by families that receive CCDF child care services. 45 CFR 98.20(a) states that children must be under age 13, reside with a family whose income does not exceed 85 percent of State/territorial/tribal median income for a family of the same size, and reside with a parent who is working or attending a job training or education program; or are in need of, or are receiving protective services. Lead agencies may choose to provide services during period of job search. CONDITION The Department of Human Services did not properly determine eligibility in 5 of 60 child care assistance cases tested by the auditor. Each of the cases had one or more of the following errors: improperly calculated household income, missing birth records, and missing income verifications. The errors resulted in improper payments totaling $1,698. When projected against the entire population, the projected error is $873,187. CAUSE The Department did not collect or maintain proper documentation to determine eligibility. In addition, data entry and income calculations were not being completed consistently and accurately. EFFECT Unallowable payments were made to providers on behalf of individuals whose eligibility for the Child Care Assistance Program were not proper. CONTEXT There were 5,694 cases that received over $29.3 million in payments for fiscal years ended June 30, 2019 and 2020. IDENTIFICATION AS A REPEAT FINDING Finding 2018-012 was reported in the immediate prior year. Findings 2016-018, 2016-028, 2014-020, 2014-017, 2012-018, 2012-024, 2010-022, 2008-006 were made in previous years. RECOMMENDATION We recommend the Department of Human Services: 1. Develop and implement controls to ensure that all eligibility workers are collecting and maintaining all applicable information for Child Care Assistance eligibility determinations, and 2. Properly determine eligibility for individuals receiving Child Care Assistance and issue payments that comply with requirements set in the Code of Federal Regulations for Child Care Development Funds. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES RESPONSE/CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN See ?Management?s Response and Corrective Action? section of this report.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding: 2020-013 Department of Human Services Response/Corrective Action Plan: The Department agrees with the recommendation. DHS provides policy and system trainings, tips and tricks and policy and processing reminders as needed through periodic statewide trainings, monthly newsletters and online help resources. This effort is done in collaboration with the Policy and System Support (PaSS) unit in Economic Assistance. The PaSS unit will begin conducting CCAP New Worker Training annually beginning the winter of 2022. The training will cover all aspects of CCAP eligibility. In March 2019, the department implemented a new eligibility system, SPACES. The implementation of this new system has made processing of cases less error prone as the system calculates all aspects of CCAP eligibility such as countable income amounts, countable households members, allowable child care hours, etc. The department is continually making improvements to the system through change requests. Quality Assurance reviews are completed monthly and the results of those reviews are used to determine training needs, corrective active, etc. to mitigate errors. Contact Person: Emily Hakanson, Child Care Assistance Program Administrator Anticipated Completion Date: CCAP New Worker training will begin annually starting winter 2022. System enhancements and other trainings, reminders, etc. are completed as needed.

Prior Finding References

2018-012

About Eligibility →
2020-014
Special Tests & Provisions
REPEATMATERIAL WEAKNESS
Condition

See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table CRITERIA 45 CFR 98.41 states that lead agencies must certify that procedures are in effect to ensure that child care providers, for which assistance is provided under the Child Care Assistance Program, comply with all applicable health and safety requirements. 45 CFR 75.303 states that the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. CONDITION The Department of Human Services is not ensuring child care centers, self-declared, group, preschool, and school-age providers comply with all health and safety standards as defined by North Dakota Administrative Code. The checklists used by county licensors, when conducting annual on-site licensing studies, do not contain all necessary health and safety requirements. The licensing study does not include items related to the following health and safety standard requirements: prevention and control of infectious diseases; prevention of sudden infant death syndrome and use of safe sleeping practices; administration of medication, consistent with standards of parental consent; prevention and responses to emergencies due to food and allergic reaction; building and physical premises safety, including identification and protection from hazards, bodies of water, and vehicular traffic; prevention of shaken baby syndrome, abusive head trauma, and child maltreatment; emergency preparedness and response planning; appropriate precautions if transporting children; pediatric first aid and cardiopulmonary resuscitation; and recognition of child abuse & neglect. CAUSE The Department did not update licensing materials to include verification that all required health and safety standards were met prior to licensing. EFFECT Child care providers may be operating without complying with health and safety requirements, potentially jeopardizing the health and safety of children. CONTEXT Disbursements for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2019 and 2020 totaled $29,366,169 for the CCDF program. The State of North Dakota had 1,944 licensed providers and 230 self declared providers during the audit period. IDENTIFICATION AS A REPEAT FINDING Finding 2018-014 was reported in the immediate prior year. Finding 2016-029 was made in the previous year. RECOMMENDATION We recommend the Department of Human Services: 1. Update the licensing study to include requirements for all necessary health and safety standards for child care centers, self-declared, group, preschool, and school-age providers, and 2. Ensure providers meet all health and safety standards required to be licensed. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES RESPONSE/CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN See ?Management?s Response and Corrective Action? section of this report.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding: 2020-014 Department of Human Services Response/Corrective Action Plan: The Department of Human Services agrees with the recommendation. The State initiated a process redesign for early childhood licensing in August 2019. The redesign was intended to improve consistency of reviews, ongoing monitoring, and corrective action across all 19 Human Service Zones. The bulk of the redesign work took place in advance of the former county-employed early childhood licensors becoming state employees (January 2020). As part of Redesign, DHS piloted the use of a streamlined on-site visit checklist to identify opportunities for efficiencies. Thirteen counties utilized the abbreviated form during pilot (August 2019 ? March 2020); the remaining counties continued to utilize the existing form. It was determined that the abbreviated form would not adequately capture information needed so, in August 2020 all licensors reverted to utilization of the full-length Compliance Checklist to assure all Health and Safety standards are being met. As part of North Dakota?s regular federal review, the current compliance checklist was reviewed by Regional OCS and all recommendations will be implemented in May 2021. Contact Person: Carmen Traeholt, Early Childhood Services Statewide Manager Anticipated Completion Date: May 2021

Prior Finding References

2018-014

About Special Tests and Provisions →
2020-015
Special Tests & Provisions
REPEAT
Condition

See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table CRITERIA 45 CFR 98.42 requires that not less than annually, an unannounced inspection for compliance with child care licensing standards, which shall include an inspection for compliance with health and safety and fire standards, shall be completed. Department policy 620-01-116 states, the authorized agent is required to perform an unannounced review at least annually for each licensed or self-declared child care provider. CONDITION The Department of Human Services is not performing annual unannounced inspections of self-declared child care providers in operation. An annual unannounced inspection was not completed on 10 of 23 self-declared providers that were tested. CAUSE The Department's procedures for ensuring unannounced visits are performed annually by county licensors are ineffective. EFFECT Child care providers are operating child care facilities without proper monitoring of whether health and safety conditions have been met. CONTEXT During fiscal years 2019 and 2020, there were 230 self-declared providers from the Child Care Assistance program. IDENTIFICATION AS A REPEAT FINDING Finding 2018-017 was reported in the immediate prior year. Finding 2016-027 was made in the previous year. RECOMMENDATION We recommend the Department of Human Services perform annual unannounced inspections of self-declared child care providers in operation as required by the Code of Federal Regulations and Department policy. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES RESPONSE/CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN See ?Management?s Response and Corrective Action? section of this report.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding: 2020-015 Department of Human Services Response/Corrective Action Plan: The Department of Human Services agrees with the recommendation. During the audit timeframe County Licensors were inconsistent in rates of completion for unannounced visits. This was due, in part, to the difference in how each County chose to administer and staff this function; licensors were not consistently required to maintain certain caseloads which contributed to uneven application of this part of the regulation. A major focus of the redesign effort was to ensure that the system was structured to ensure early childhood specialists time was organized to maximize time spent on visits. As part of redesign all Licensing Specialists are assigned a specific case load so they can schedule and follow through with unannounced visits for their assigned providers. This new distribution of work accompanied the transition from county to state employment (Jan 2020) and was being implemented by mid-2020. Early Childhood Services is currently in the process of designing a database to ensure all required documents and licensing visits are complete prior to issuing licenses and certificates to providers. The data base will be complete in April of 2022. Contact Person: Carmen Traeholt, Early Childhood Services Statewide Manager Anticipated Completion Date: April 2022

Prior Finding References

2018-017

About Special Tests and Provisions →
2020-016
Special Tests & Provisions
REPEAT
Condition

See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table CRITERIA 45 CFR 75.303 states that the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. The Department's Early Childhood Services Quality Assurance Policy (620-01-20-20) requires the regional office to perform random provider reviews on an annual basis with the authorized agent. CONDITION The Department of Human Services' monitoring procedures of the county licensors of child care providers is ineffective. The Department's Early Childhood Services supervisors perform procedural reviews of county licensor activities. The selection procedures do not include assurance that activities of all county licensors are reviewed. In addition, errors identified during our testing indicate these reviews are clearly ineffective at identifying material weaknesses and inconsistencies. These errors include nonperformance of unannounced visits, lack of monitoring of corrective orders, and improperly licensed providers. CAUSE The Department has not designed monitoring procedures to carry out the purpose of licensing early childhood service providers to safeguard the health, safety, and development of children. EFFECT Child care providers are operating without complying with licensing requirements and proper monitoring of health and safety conditions which may jeopardize the health and safety of children. CONTEXT The Child Care Assistance program has 5 regional representatives. DHS has created county zone areas throughout the State. This structure has not been fully implemented by assigning zones and responsibilities and, until it is, this finding applies to the regional supervisor responsibilities according to DHS policy. IDENTIFICATION AS A REPEAT FINDING Finding 2018-018 was reported in the immediate prior year. Finding 2016-025 was made in the previous year. RECOMMENDATION We recommend the Department of Human Services perform effective monitoring procedures to ensure all functions of the Child Care Assistance program are properly completed including monitoring correction orders, completing unannounced visits, and properly licensing providers. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES RESPONSE/CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN See ?Management?s Response and Corrective Action? section of this report.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding: 2020-016 Department of Human Services Response/Corrective Action Plan: The Department agrees with the recommendation. Early Childhood Services Redesign moved all County Licensors to State employment (Jan 2020) and Early Childhood Services Regional Representatives to a Supervisor status (March 2020). These steps will change how a QA visit is completed. QA visits starting in 2021 will include both standard performance reviews of licensors as well as quality assurance review of outputs and outcomes. This includes review of how licensors conduct visits and complete their core work related to license compliance and health and safety practices of child care programs. Contact Person: Carmen Traeholt, Early Childhood Services Statewide Manager Anticipated Completion Date: June 2021

Prior Finding References

2018-018

About Special Tests and Provisions →
2020-017
Special Tests & Provisions
QUESTIONED COSTS
Condition

See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table CRITERIA 45 CFR ?261.60 states: (a) A State must report the actual hours that an individual participates in an activity, subject to the qualifications in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section and ?261.61(c). It is not sufficient to report the hours an individual is scheduled to participate in an activity. 45 CFR ?261.61 states: (a) A State must support each individual's hours of participation through documentation in the case file. In accordance with ?261.62, a State must describe in its Work Verification Plan the documentation it uses to verify hours of participation in each activity. North Dakota?s Work Verification Plan outlines the use of JOBS Employment Contractors to determine the individual?s hours of participation. The process includes sampling of the JOBS Employment Contractor work to ensure accuracy. 45 CFR ?261.20 states: (c) If the data show that a State met both participation rates in a fiscal year, then the percentage of historic State expenditures that it must expend under TANF, pursuant to ?263.1 of this chapter, decreases from 80 percent to 75 percent for that fiscal year. This is also known as the State's TANF ?maintenance-of-effort? (MOE) requirement.(d) If the data show that a State did not meet a minimum work participation rate for a fiscal year, a State could be subject to a financial penalty. CONDITION The Department of Human Services (DHS) is not in compliance with the Work Verification Plan in regards to monitoring data used to calculate the work participation rate. The work participation rate effects the maintenance-of-effort requirement and could result in sanctions if minimum work participation rates are not met. DHS contracts with Job Opportunities and Basic Skills (JOBS) Employment Contractors to verify work verification documents provided by the client in meeting their work participation hours requirements. This sampling was halted during SPACES implementation. DHS uses this information to report data on their State Work Participation Rates on the ACF-199 report. CAUSE Since SPACES went live, DHS has fallen behind on sending cases to the JOBS work contractors for audit and therefore audits and results thereof are not available. EFFECT DHS's reported Work Participation Rates could be incorrectly calculated which could result in additional maintenance-of-effort requirements and Federal sanctions. CONTEXT No sampling was provided by the Department of Human Services to the JOBS contractors following the March 2019 implementation of the SPACES eligibility system (February 2019 was last monthly sample). RECOMMENDATION We recommend the Department of Human Services ensure compliance with the Work Verification Plan. This includes the JOBS verification of TANF cases and maintenance of results for work participation status accuracy. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES RESPONSE/CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN See ?Management?s Response and Corrective Action? section of this report.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding: 2020-017 Department of Human Services Response/Corrective Action Plan: The Department agrees with the recommendation. DHS acknowledges that due to SPACES implementation, the sampling sent to JOBS contractors was put on hold and not provided. Effective February 2021, all future Random Sampling Reports will be sent out monthly. The following monthly Random Sampling Reports have been provided to the Employment Contractors: ? October, November and December 2019 were provided in May 2020 ? April, May and June 2019 were provide in June 2020 ? January, February and March 2020 were provided in June 2020 ? July, August and September 2019 were provided in August 2020 ? April, May and June 2020 were provided in August 2020 ? July, August and September 2020 were provided in December 2020 ? October and November 2020 were provided on January 4, 2021 ? December 2020 will be sent out in February 2021 Contact Person: Joan Schatz, TANF/JOBS Program Administrator Anticipated Completion Date: February 2021

About Special Tests and Provisions →
2020-018
Subrecipient Monitoring
REPEAT
Condition

See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart table CRITERIA Per Title 2 CFR 200.331, pass-through entities are required to "(b) Evaluate each subrecipient's risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring described in paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section, which may include consideration of such factors as: (1) The subrecipient's prior experience with the same or similar subawards; (2) The results of previous audits including whether or not the subrecipient receives a Single Audit in accordance with Subpart F - Audit Requirements of this part, and the extent to which the same or similar subaward has been audited as a major program; (3) Whether the subrecipient has new personnel or new or substantially changed systems; and (4) The extent and results of Federal awarding agency monitoring (eg. if the subrecipient also receives Federal awards directly from a Federal awarding agency)." 45 CFR 75.303 states that the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. CONDITION The Department of Human Services (DHS) risk assessment process of subrecipients is insufficient. DHS did complete a risk assessment for every subrecipient, but the risk assessments are not being used to determine the nature and extent of subrecipient monitoring. CAUSE The Department of Human Services has developed policies and procedures to determine the nature and extent of subrecipient monitoring to be performed but the policies and procedures do not take into account the results of the risk assessments performed. EFFECT DHS may be performing insufficient subrecipient monitoring of high risk subrecipients. CONTEXT Payments to subrecipients under the Foster Care program totaled $10,160,284 during fiscal years 2019 and 2020. IDENTIFICATION AS A REPEAT FINDING Finding 2018-035 was reported in the immediate prior year. Finding 2016-060 was made in the previous year. RECOMMENDATION We recommend the Department of Human Services ensure subrecipient risk assessments are used to determine the nature and extent of subrecipient monitoring. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES RESPONSE/CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN See ?Management?s Response and Corrective Action? section of this report.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding: 2020-018 Department of Human Services Response/Corrective Action Plan: The Department of Human Services agrees with this recommendation. The Child and Family Services (CFS) policy Foster Care Eligibility Quality Assurance Reviews 447-10-18 is under revision to accommodate the changes of eligibility unit implementation and how to apply review for high risk of agencies. The fiscal office compiles the county/zone risk assessment on a yearly basis. CFS sends NDDHS Fiscal the required information (results of Foster Care reviews, OCR reviews, etc). The request to take the results of that combined risk assessment into account when selecting foster care reviews is embedded into the new draft policy. For example: If a zone is deemed high risk during the risk assessment and is not due for a file review, the high-risk knowledge will be considered in future sampling. It is imperative to mention that the North Dakota Department of Human Services, the North Dakota Association of Counties, and local human service zone leaders, with the support of Gov. Doug Burgum and state lawmakers continue to redesign social services. This collaborative effort began with the passage of Senate Bill 2206 in 2017, continued with the passage of Senate Bill 2124 in 2019 and is currently being heard as Senate Bill 2086 during the 2021 legislative assembly. Due to redesign efforts, the Centralized Foster Care & Subsidized Adoption Eligibility Unit, absorbed as a function of Children and Family Services (CFS), went live February 1, 2021. The overall goals are to implement standardized procedures which offer consistency and efficiencies for workers, providers, and families, while reducing financial errors and overpayments for the state. The unit will manage the o Eligibility determinations for foster care cases, while authorizing eligible foster care payments. o Eligibility determinations for children seeking prevention services, also known as candidates for foster care. o Sub-adopt negotiation process, while authorizing all eligible subsidy payments. o Opening and closing of ND Medicaid for all foster and sub-adopt cases. Effective, February 1, 2021 much of the review is about our own NDDHS employees and error rate with payments or eligibility determinations. However, we will be able to notify the Zones/agencies if they are not getting information to the unit timely resulting in fiscal error. Contact Person: Kelsey Bless, Permanency Administrator at Children and Family Services Anticipated Completion Date: March 2021

Prior Finding References

2018-035

About Subrecipient Monitoring →
2020-019
Period of Performance
REPEATQUESTIONED COSTS
Condition

See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table CRITERIA The following criteria note that Federal funds must be obligated by the end of the two-year period of performance window and those obligations must be liquidated within 90 days after the end date of period of performance. 2 CFR 200.343 requires: " Unless the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity authorizes an extension, a non-Federal entity must liquidate all obligations incurred under the Federal award not later than 90 calendar days after the end date of the period of performance as specified in the terms and conditions of the Federal award. 34 CFR 361.64 requires: " (a) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, any Federal funds, including reallotted funds, that are appropriated for a fiscal year to carry out a program under this part that are not obligated by the State by the beginning of the succeeding fiscal year and any program income received during a fiscal year that is not obligated by the State by the beginning of the succeeding fiscal year remain available for obligation by the State during that succeeding fiscal year. (b) Federal funds appropriated for a fiscal year remain available for obligation in the succeeding fiscal year only to the extent that the State met the matching requirement for those Federal funds by obligating, in accordance with 34 CFR 76.707, the non-Federal share in the fiscal year for which the funds were appropriated." The following criteria pertains to the establishment and maintenance of effective internal control to ensure payments are made within the correct period of performance. 45 CFR 75.303 states the non-Federal entity must, "establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award." CONDITION The Department of Human Services made payments under the Vocational Rehabilitation program outside of the 2018 grant award period of performance which was 10/1/17 - 9/30/19 with an allowable liquidation period, to pay for obligations, through 12/31/19. Payments made after the liquidation period totaled $94,081 for the 2018 grant. CAUSE The Department of Human Services, Vocational Rehabilitation Program, did not properly update speedcharts, which provide for automated coding within the State's accounting system, at its Regional Human Service Centers. This issue was noted in three of the four errors found in sampling and permitted unallowable costs to be charged to the 2018 Federal grant. The final error was due to improper coding when the payment was entered into the system. In addition, review of the program's internal controls regarding period of performance proved inadequate to detect payments made outside of the period of performance as documentation of the review to ensure expenditures are applied to the correct period of performance was not maintained. EFFECT Unallowable costs totaling $94,081 were charged to the grant and are questioned costs. CONTEXT The Department of Human Services, Vocational Rehabilitation program, had expenditures of approximately $7.6 million from the 2018 grant award during the audit period. Of this amount, $94,081 was identified as a known questioned cost from 66 payments. These are all payments after the period of performance. IDENTIFICATION AS A REPEAT FINDING Finding 2018-031 was reported in the immediate prior year. Finding 2016-053 was made in the previous year. RECOMMENDATION We recommend the Department of Human Services implement procedures to prevent and detect Vocational Rehabilitation payments from occurring outside the period of performance. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES RESPONSE/CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN See ?Management?s Response and Corrective Action? section of this report.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding: 2020-019 Department of Human Services Response/Corrective Action Plan: The Department agrees with the recommendation. Program Accountant plans on creating a procedure manual for the end of the period of performance, to identify charges that need to be applied to the appropriate grant year. Currently there is not written procedure manual or documentation that outlines the steps needed to ensure proper period of performance. This procedure manual to be created will outline the steps the Program Accountant needs to take in order to check all transactions posting to Peoplesoft from the AWARE case management system, check Peoplesoft speedcharts for both VR central office and the VR regional offices located in the Human Service Centers, and checking the history database for any errors on to ensure a comprehensive review of all transactions between the AWARE system and Peoplesoft. Contact Person: Jacqueline Ressler, Account Manager and Isabel Tischmak, Vocational Rehab Program Accountant Anticipated Completion Date: November 30, 2020

Prior Finding References

2018-031

About Period of Performance →
2020-020
Subrecipient Monitoring
Condition

See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table CRITERIA 2 CFR 200.331(d) states that all pass through entities must monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward. Pass through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity detected through audits. Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government (Green Book) require management to establish and operate monitoring activities to monitor the internal control system and evaluate the results. (GAO-14-704G para 16.01) CONDITION The Department of Public Instruction is not ensuring timely and appropriate action was taken on deficiencies noted during fiscal subrecipient monitoring of the Special Education Cluster. During testing of subrecipient monitoring, we noted 3 of the 8 subrecipients tested each had one monitoring finding, but no timely follow-up procedures were completed by the Department to ensure the findings were resolved. CAUSE The tracking spreadsheet for fiscal subrecipient monitoring only includes when the audit was completed or when it is planned. There is no tracking of the results, if there were recommendations, and if any follow-up was completed on those recommendations. EFFECT If deficiencies are not resolved, subrecipients receiving Federal funds may not be in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward. CONTEXT The Department of Public Instruction paid approximately $59 million in Federal funds between 07/01/2018-06/30/2020 to over 30 Special Education Cluster subrecipients. During the audit period 23 subrecipients received fiscal monitoring procedures. RECOMMENDATION We recommend the Department of Public Instruction strengthen fiscal subrecipient monitoring procedures for the Special Education Cluster to ensure timely and appropriate action is taken on deficiencies noted during the fiscal review. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION RESPONSE/CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN See ?Management?s Response and Corrective Action? section of this report.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding: 2020-020 Department of Public Instruction Response/Corrective Action Plan: The Department of Public Instruction agrees with the recommendation. The Department will review and update procedures for monitoring the Special Education Cluster. Contact Person: Jamie Mertz, Fiscal Management Director Anticipated Completion Date: July 1, 2021

About Subrecipient Monitoring →
2020-021
Subrecipient Monitoring
REPEAT
Condition

See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table CRITERIA 2 CFR 200.331(f) states that a pass-through entity must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by 2 CFR 200 Subpart F. 2 CFR 200.331(d)(2) states that a pass-through entity must ensure subrecipients take timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity through audits, on-site reviews, and other means. 2 CFR 200.521(d) states that a pass-through entity must issue a management decision within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the Federal Audit Clearinghouse (FAC). Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government (Green Book) require management to establish and operate monitoring activities to monitor the internal control system and evaluate the results. (GAO-14-704G para 16.01) CONDITION The Department of Public Instruction did not ensure that all subrecipients were audited under 2 CFR 200 Subpart F as applicable. For two subrecipients who received a total of $2,288,238 in Federal funds from the Department of Public Instruction during Fiscal Year 2018, the Department did not ensure that the necessary audits were completed, issue management decisions within a timely manner, or ensure corrective action was taken on any deficiencies identified. One of these subrecipients did submit an audit into the Federal audit clearinghouse and there were five recommendations to review. The other subrecipient never had an audit completed. For three subrecipients who received a total of $625,464 in Federal funds from the Department of Public Instruction during Fiscal Year 2018, the Department did not issue management decisions within a timely manner or ensure corrective action was taken on any deficiencies identified. All three subrecipients submitted an audit to the Federal audit clearinghouse and one of the three subrecipients had a total of 14 audit recommendations. The remaining two subrecipients did not have any audit recommendations. CAUSE The Department of Public Instruction is not completing all elements of the tracking spreadsheet or reviewing the spreadsheet to ensure all subrecipients are included, management decisions are done within six months, and that appropriate and timely corrective action is being taken by the subrecipients. EFFECT Subrecipients spending more than $750,000 from all Federal sources may not be obtaining audits as required or implementing a corrective action plan in a timely manner if findings are noted in audits that were completed. CONTEXT The Department of Public Instruction disbursed Federal dollars to a total of 258 subrecipients during Fiscal Year 2018 that received $25,000 or more in Federal funds. We sampled 60 of these subrecipients which resulted in 5 errors for an error rate of 8.3%. IDENTIFICATION AS A REPEAT FINDING Finding 2018-041 was reported in the immediate prior year. RECOMMENDATION We recommend the Department of Public Instruction: ? Ensure all subrecipients obtain audits in accordance with 2 CFR 200 Subpart F if they meet the requirements, ? Issue management decisions within a timely manner, and, ? Ensure subrecipients took timely corrective action on deficiencies identified in the audits. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION RESPONSE/CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN See ?Management?s Response and Corrective Action? section of this report.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding: 2020-021 Department of Public Instruction Response/Corrective Action Plan: The Department of Public Instruction agrees with the recommendation. We have reviewed our audit procedures as well as 2 CFR 200 Subpart F. We will be looking possible ways to utilize a notification system so that deadlines are not missed as well as following up on outstanding issues. Contact Person: Jamie Mertz, Fiscal Management Director Anticipated Completion Date: May 1, 2021

Prior Finding References

2018-041

About Subrecipient Monitoring →
2020-022
Subrecipient Monitoring
REPEAT
Condition

See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table CRITERIA 31 U.S.C 7502(f)(2)(A) states that each pass-through entity shall provide subrecipients the Federal requirements which govern the use of such awards. 2 CFR 200.332 states the required information that pass-through entities must disclose. This includes information related to Federal award identification, requirements imposed by the pass-through entity on the subrecipient, any additional requirements, approved Federally recognized indirect cost rate, requirements that the subrecipient allow access to records, and appropriate terms and conditions concerning closeout of the subaward. CONDITION The Department of Public Instruction did not make subrecipients aware of all required grant award information for the Title I Grants to Local Education Agencies, Twenty-First Century Community Learning Centers, Special Education Cluster, Child Nutrition Cluster, Child and Adult Care Food Program, and Supporting Effective Instruction State Grant. ? Title I Errors o Missing information for all 40 tested grant awards: ? Identification of whether the award is R&D, ? Whether there were are any additional requirements that the pass-through entity imposes on the subrecipient in order for the pass-through entity to meet its own responsibility to the Federal awarding agency including identification of any required financial and performance reports, ? Appropriate terms and conditions concerning closeout of the subaward. o 1 out of the 40 in the sample had an incorrect DUNS number on the grant award. ? 21st Century Errors: o Missing information on 2 of 3 tested grant awards: ? 1 instance of incorrect Subrecipient name (which must match the name associated with its unique entity identifier); ? 2 instances of missing Federal Award Date of award to the recipient by the Federal agency; ? Special Ed Errors o Missing information for all 15 tested grant awards: ? Federal Award Date of award to the recipient by the Federal agency ? CFDA Number and Name; the pass-through entity must identify the dollar amount made available under each Federal award and the CFDA number at time of disbursement o 1 out of the 15 in the sample had a DUNS number error. ? Child Nutrition Cluster and Child and Adult Care Food Program Errors: o Missing information for all 14 tested grant awards:: ? Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN), ? Subaward Period of Performance Start and End Date, ? Amount of Federal Funds Obligated by this action by the pass-through entity to the subrecipient, ? Total Amount of Federal Funds Obligated to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity including the current obligation, ? Total Amount of the Federal Award committed to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity, ? Name of Federal awarding agency, pass-through entity, and contact information for awarding official of the Pass-through entity, ? Identification of whether the award is R&D, ? Indirect cost rate for the Federal award (including if the de minimis rate is charged), ? Whether there are any additional requirements that the pass-through entity imposes on the subrecipient in order for the pass-through entity to meet its own responsibility to the Federal awarding agency including identification of any required financial and performance reports, ? An approved Federally recognized indirect cost rate negotiated between the subrecipient and the Federal Government or, if no such rate exists, either a rate negotiated between the pass-through entity and the subrecipient, or a de minimis indirect cost rate, and ? Appropriate terms and conditions concerning closeout of the subaward. ? Supporting Effective Instruction State Grant Errors o Missing information for all 11 tested grant awards: ? Identification of whether the award is R&D, ? Whether there are any additional requirements that the pass-through entity imposes on the subrecipient in order for the pass-through entity to meet its own responsibility to the Federal awarding agency including identification of any required financial and performance reports, and ? Appropriate terms and conditions concerning closeout of the subaward. CAUSE For the Child Nutrition Cluster and Child and Adult Care Food Program, the program agreement or NDFoods system were not updated following the prior audit finding. The individual responsible for updating the program agreement and NDFoods system indicated they were not aware that changes were to be made from the prior audit finding. For the Title I Grants to Local Education Agencies and Supporting Effective Instruction State Grant, the consolidated application in STARS system was not updated for all required grant award information. The R & D field was missed when requesting updates to the consolidated application in STARS following the prior audit finding. Also, the program staff indicated they were not aware the consolidated application was being cut-off from view in STARS so the entire application and award information could not be seen. For the Twenty-First Century Community Learning Centers program and the Special Education Cluster, data entry errors caused incorrect award information to be entered into the award agreement. EFFECT Subrecipients may not have been aware of all necessary grant information and requirements. CONTEXT The number of grant agreements during the time period analyzed is listed below. The time period was July 1, 2018 to June 30, 2020 for all programs listed except for programs D - F. For these programs, the number of grant agreements below are for the time period of July 1, 2019 to June 30, 2020. A. The Title I Grants to Local Education Agencies: 274 B. The Twenty-First Century Community Learning Centers: 11 C. The Special Education Cluster program: 123 D. The Child Nutrition Cluster: 203 E. The Child and Adult Care Food Program: 104 F. The Supporting Effective Instruction State Grant: 117 IDENTIFICATION AS A REPEAT FINDING Finding 2018-042 was reported in the immediate prior year. Finding 2016-068 was made in the previous year. RECOMMENDATION We recommend the Department of Public Instruction ensure that subrecipients are made aware of all required grant award information. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION RESPONSE/CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN See ?Management?s Response and Corrective Action? section of this report.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding: 2020-022 Department of Public Instruction Response/Corrective Action Plan: The Department of Public Instruction agrees with the recommendation. The following additional review and approval has been implemented. ? If the Grant Award Notification is system generated, the agency Fiscal Management Director will sign off on the Grant Award Notification template before the first one is issued. ? If the Grant Award Notification is manually created, the agency Fiscal Management Director will sign the form before it is sent to the grantee. We believe this additional approval will eliminate the inconsistencies and errors occurring across the agency offices when completing these notifications. Contact Person: Jamie Mertz, Fiscal Management Director Anticipated Completion Date: Process change was implemented February 2, 2021

Prior Finding References

2018-042

About Subrecipient Monitoring →
2020-023
Period of Performance
REPEATQUESTIONED COSTS
Condition

See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table CRITERIA 2 CFR 200.343(b) states unless the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity authorizes an extension, a non-Federal entity must liquidate all obligations incurred under the Federal award not later than 90 calendar days after the end date of the period of performance as specified in the terms and conditions of the Federal award. 2 CFR 200.309 states a non-Federal entity may charge to the Federal award only allowable costs incurred during the period of performance. CONDITION The Department of Public Instruction made payments after the period of performance. Although the underlying obligations occurred within the period of performance, payments totaling $19,684 did not comply with the Federal period of performance requirements for the Child Nutrition Cluster. These payments were made after the 90 day payment period following the end of the applicable grant awards. There is also a payment of $12,839 which lacked documentation to determine if the underlying obligations occurred within the period of performance and did not comply with the Federal period of performance liquidation period requirements for the Child Nutrition Cluster. The projection on the known questioned costs of $32,523 is an additional $1,153 in payments made after the period of performance. CAUSE For 2 out of 5 items tested, the Department of Public Instruction's system, NDFoods, and PeopleSoft, the state's accounting system, did not properly communicate payment of claims. Two separate payments of the 5 items tested were in error due to untimely identification of an incorrect reimbursement rate being applied to meals which lead to a subsequent correction payment made after the period of performance. Finally, 1 additional payment separate from the errors already identified, was an error due to a lack of documentation of the transaction. EFFECT The Department of Public Instruction charged unallowable costs to the grant. CONTEXT 26 of the 6,636 disbursements that were made by the Department of Public Instruction for the Child Nutrition Cluster for grants that ended during fiscal years 2019 and 2020 were paid outside of the 90 day period of performance. IDENTIFICATION AS A REPEAT FINDING Finding 2018-039 was reported in the immediate prior year. RECOMMENDATION We recommend the Department of Public Instruction ensure Child Nutrition Cluster obligations occur within the period of performance and that payments are not made after the period of performance. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION RESPONSE/CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN See ?Management?s Response and Corrective Action? section of this report.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding: 2020-023 Department of Public Instruction Response/Corrective Action Plan: The Department of Public Instruction is rewriting internal procedures to ensure that the Child Nutrition Cluster obligations will occur within the period of performance and payment will not be made after the period of performance. Contact Person: Linda Schloer, Director of Child Nutrition and Food Programs Anticipated Completion Date: March 31, 2021

Prior Finding References

2018-039

About Period of Performance →
2020-024
Subrecipient Monitoring
QUESTIONED COSTS
Condition

See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table CRITERIA 2 CFR 200.332(f) requires a pass-through entity to verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by 2 CFR 200 Subpart F and (g) consider whether the results of the subrecipient's audits necessitate adjustments to the pass-through entity's own records and (h) consider taking enforcement action against noncompliant subrecipients. Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? (Green Book) requires management assign responsibilities and perform ongoing monitoring of the design and operating effectiveness of the internal control as part of the normal course of operations. Management must also communicate policies and procedures to personnel so that personnel can implement the control activities for their assigned responsibilities and ensure corrective actions. (Green Book, para. 3.07, 12.02, 12.04, 16.05, 17.05) CONDITION The North Dakota Department of Transportation failed to adequately track which subrecipients required Uniform Guidance audits and review audit reports for findings within 6 months. CAUSE The client inadvertently failed adequately follow-up with subrecipients to determine if a Single Audit report was required and also failed to adequately review the reports that were reported for any issues related to Department grants. EFFECT Subrecipients spending more than $750,000 from all sources including the Department of Transportation may not be obtaining audits as required and issues related to Department of Transportation funding may be unresolved. CONTEXT The Department of Transportation's subrecipient audit tracking spreadsheets following state fiscal years 2018 and 2019, the Department identified 131 and 117 subrecipients, respectively, each year. The Department's tracking for fiscal year 2018 identified certifications and all further audit documentation was not received for 9 subrecipients as well as 4 additional audits which were noted to have been completed, but no review by the Department of Transportation's Audit Services was completed within 6 months. For fiscal year 2019, certifications and all further audit documentation was not received for 11 subrecipients as well as 10 additional audits which were noted to have been completed but no review by the Department of Transportation's Audit Services was completed within 6 months. RECOMMENDATION We recommend the Department of Transportation identify annually, based on the subrecipient's fiscal year, all subrecipients that spent $750,000 or more in Federal awards from all sources through developed certification procedures. We also recommend the Department of Transportation ensure the certification tracking method is completed, to ensure all required audits are completed within nine months of the subrecipient?s fiscal year end, management decisions are issued within six months of receiving the audit report, and timely and appropriate corrective action of all findings. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RESPONSE/CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN See ?Management?s Response and Corrective Action? section of this report.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding: 2020-024 Department of Transportation Response/Corrective Action Plan: ND DOT agrees with the finding. Part 1: NDDOT's Quality Assurance & Internal Review Division has implemented a continuous screening process for subrecipient audit reports and will be working with the program managers to ensure adequate tracking and enforcement of audit requirements and follow up on management decisions to ensure accountability of subrecipients with timely and appropriate corrective action. Part 2: Program managers have been assigned the responsibility to ensure that all subrecipient certifications are obtained and reviewed, all required audits are completed and provided to NDDOT and/or the audit clearinghouse in accordance with established time requirements, all management decisions are issued as required, as corrective action plan is developed and implemented, and follow up occurs as necessary. Contact Person: Part 1: Jody Isaak, Audit Services Director; Part 2: Paul Benning, Local Government Engineer Anticipated Completion Date: March 1, 2021

About Subrecipient Monitoring →
2020-025
Subrecipient Monitoring
Condition

See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table CRITERIA 2 CFR 200.332 (b) states that all pass-through entities must evaluate each subrecipient's risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring. Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? (Green Book) requires management identify, analyze, and respond to risks related to achieving the defined objectives. (Green Book, para. 7.01) CONDITION The Department of Transportation is not evaluating each subrecipient's risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining appropriate subrecipient monitoring. CAUSE The Department of Transportation indicated the cause was client oversight due to the fact the requirement was not included in the previous state plan. However, the Department has since developed a risk assessment tool to evaluate subrecipient's risk of noncompliance starting in 2021. EFFECT High-risk subrecipients may not be subjected to adequate monitoring procedures to ensure Federal funds were used for authorized purposes in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward. CONTEXT The Formula Grants for Rural Areas had 30 subrecipients in the audit period. RECOMMENDATION We recommend the Department of Transportation evaluate each subrecipient's risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RESPONSE/CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN See ?Management?s Response and Corrective Action? section of this report.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding: 2020-025 Department of Transportation Response/Corrective Action Plan: NDDOT agrees with the finding. An internal control questionnaire has been created and each agency is required to fill out and return the questionnaire annually. A risk assessment matrix has also been created and is filled out based on the internal control questionnaire in order to determine appropriate subrecipient monitoring based on overall risk. Contact Person: Paul Benning, Local Government Engineer Anticipated Completion Date: March 1, 2021

About Subrecipient Monitoring →
2020-026
Subrecipient Monitoring
Condition

See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table CRITERIA 2 CFR ?200.332 Requirements for pass-through entities. All pass-through entities must: (a) Ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the following information at the time of the subaward and if any of these data elements change, include the changes in subsequent subaward modification. When some of this information is not available, the pass-through entity must provide the best information available to describe the Federal award and subaward. Required information includes: (1) Federal award identification. (i) Subrecipient name (which must match the name associated with its unique entity identifier); (ii) Subrecipient's unique entity identifier; (iii) Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN); (iv) Federal Award Date (see the definition of Federal award date in ?200.1 of this part) of award to the recipient by the Federal agency; (v) Subaward Period of Performance Start and End Date; (vi) Subaward Budget Period Start and End Date; (vii) Amount of Federal Funds Obligated by this action by the pass-through entity to the subrecipient; (viii) Total Amount of Federal Funds Obligated to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity including the current financial obligation; (ix) Total Amount of the Federal Award committed to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity; (x) Federal award project description, as required to be responsive to the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA); (xi) Name of Federal awarding agency, pass-through entity, and contact information for awarding official of the Pass-through entity; (xii) Assistance Listings number and Title; the pass-through entity must identify the dollar amount made available under each Federal award and the Assistance Listings Number at time of disbursement; (xiii) Identification of whether the award is R&D; and (xiv) Indirect cost rate for the Federal award (including if the de minimis rate is charged) per ?200.414. CONDITION The Department of Transportation did not provide the subrecipient unique entity identifier, Federal award identification number, and Federal award date as required by 2 CFR 200.332(a) related to Federal award identification to subrecipients. CAUSE The previous grant agreements used for the Formula Grants for Other than Urbanized Areas program did not contain the necessary information. EFFECT Subrecipients may not have the required information. CONTEXT The Formula Grants for Rural Areas had 30 subrecipients in the audit period. RECOMMENDATION We recommend the Department of Transportation ensure subrecipients are provided all required information related to Federal award identification. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RESPONSE/CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN See ?Management?s Response and Corrective Action? section of this report.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding: 2020-026 Department of Transportation Response/Corrective Action Plan: ND DOT agrees with the finding. A process has been developed whereby each required element will be provided to the subrecipient via inclusion in the subaward agreement. Contact Person: Paul Benning, Local Government Engineer Anticipated Completion Date: March 1, 2021

About Subrecipient Monitoring →
2020-027
Subrecipient Monitoring
Condition

See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table CRITERIA 2 CFR 200.332(f) states that a pass-through entity must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by 2 CFR 200 Subpart F. 2 CFR 200.332(d)(2) states that a pass-through entity must ensure subrecipients take timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies detected through audits pertaining to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity. 2 CFR 200.512 states that all audit reports must be completed and submitted within nine months of the end of the audit period. 2 CFR 200.521 (d) states that a pass-through entity must issue a management decision within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the Federal Audit Clearinghouse (FAC). 2 CFR 200.303 (a) states that the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. CONDITION The State Treasurer's Office (STO) did not ensure that all subrecipients were audited under OMB 2 CFR 200 Subpart F as applicable. For three of the four subrecipients tested who received a total of $18,978,662 in Federal funds from the State Treasurer's Office during Fiscal Year 2018, the STO did not ensure that the necessary audits were completed, issue management decisions within a timely manner, or ensure corrective action was taken on any deficiencies identified. For three of the four subrecipients tested who received a total of $45,815,902 in Federal funds from the State Treasurer's Office during Fiscal Year 2019, the STO did not ensure that the necessary audits were completed, issue management decisions within a timely manner, or ensure corrective action was taken on any deficiencies identified. CAUSE The State Treasurer's Office does not have all the necessary monitoring procedures in place to ensure all the subrecipient audit requirements are being met. The annual certification form that the State Treasurer's Office utilizes does not have the subrecipient indicate if they spent $750,000 or more in Federal awards from all sources during their fiscal year. EFFECT Subrecipients spending more than $750,000 from all Federal sources including the State Treasurer's Office may not be obtaining audits as required or implementing a corrective action plan in a timely manner if findings are noted in audits that were completed. CONTEXT The State Treasurer's Office (STO) did not receive audits for subrecipients that received a significant amount of Federal funds from the STO. The State Treasurer's Office disbursed Federal dollars to a total of 26 subrecipients during Fiscal Year 2018 and 21 subrecipients during Fiscal Year 2019 for a total of 47 subrecipients given $86,704,892 for the two years. We sampled the audit report monitoring of 8 of these subrecipients. We found noncompliance with monitoring for 6 of the 8 subrecipients tested for an error rate of 75%. These six subrecipients that were missing audit reports had received $64,794,564 from the STO which is 75% of all dollars paid out to all subrecipients for the 2 years ($64,794,564 / $86,704,892 = 75%). RECOMMENDATION We recommend the State Treasurer's Office identify annually, through a certification process, all subrecipients that spent $750,000 or more in Federal awards from all sources during their fiscal year. We also recommend the State Treasurer's Office enhance their existing tracking procedures to ensure all required audits are completed within nine months of the subrecipient?s fiscal year end, management decisions are issued within six months of receiving the audit report, and timely and appropriate corrective action is taken on all applicable findings. STATE TREASURERS OFFICE RESPONSE/CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN See ?Management?s Response and Corrective Action? section of this report.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding: 2020-027 State Treasurer Office Response/Corrective Action Plan: The Office of State Treasurer agrees with the finding and subsequent recommendation made by the State Auditor?s Office. The Office of State Treasurer will enhance its subrecipient monitoring processes by modifying the annual certifications we send out to subrecipients to require an affirmative response as to whether the subrecipients are required to complete an audit and, if required, that it was completed timely. We will ensure required subrecipient audits are completed and posted to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse timely and, if not, will follow up with the subrecipient to seek resolution. We will also review posted audits for all subrecipients to ensure there are no deficiencies detected for Federal awards passed through by our office and, if there are, appropriate action is taken to remedy said deficiencies. Contact Person: Ryan Skor, Director of Finance Anticipated Completion Date: July 31, 2021

About Subrecipient Monitoring →
2020-028
Reporting
Condition

See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table CRITERIA Part 4 Section C of the Certification and Agreement states in part: "Recipient shall promptly comply with section 18004(e) of the CARES Act and (i) report to the Secretary thirty (30) days from the date of this certification and agreement". A May 6th Electronic Announcement from the Office of Post Secondary Education Regarding the Higher Education Emergency Relief Funds Reporting states in part: "The Certification and Agreement directs each institution applying for HEERF funds to comply with Section 18004(e) of the CARES Act and submit an initial report (the ?30-day Fund Report?) to the Secretary thirty (30) days from the date of the institution?s Certification and Agreement to the Department. The Department will provide instructions for providing the required information to the Secretary in the near future. In the meantime, each HEERF participating institution must post the information listed below on the institution?s primary website. The Department would like to receive the most current information from the date when the institution received its allocation for emergency financial aid grants to students, and the institution should have received its allocation within a few days after submitting the Certification and Agreement. Accordingly, the following information must appear in a format and location that is easily accessible to the public 30 days after the date when the institution received its allocation under 18004(a)(1) ". CONDITION Lake Region State College, Mayville State University and North Dakota State College of Science did not submit their 30 day fund report to their web site within the required 30 days for the Higher Education Emergency Relief Funds. Williston State College did not complete a 30 day fund report for the Higher Education Emergency Relief Funds. CAUSE There was a lack of guidance regarding what information is to be reported and where to report. EFFECT Information was not reported in a timely matter. CONTEXT Lake Region State College was three days late in reporting the $29,062 that had been distributed to date. Mayville State University was nine days late in reporting the $35,500 that had been distributed to date. North Dakota State College of Science was seven days late in reporting the $351,282 that had been distributed to date. Williston State College did not report that they had not distributed any money to date. RECOMMENDATION We recommend that Lake Region State College, Mayville State University, North Dakota State College of Science, and Williston State College comply with the reporting requirements of the Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund. UNIVERSITY SYSTEM RESPONSE/CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN See ?Management?s Response and Corrective Action? section of this report.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding: 2020-028 University System Response/Corrective Action Plan: By June 30, 2021, Lake Region State College (LRSC), Mayville State University (MaSU), North Dakota State College of Science (NDSCS) and Williston State College (WSC) will carefully review the HEERF certification and agreement to ensure required reports are filed in a timely manner. Contact Person: LRSC: Corry Kenner, Vice President for Administrative Affairs MaSU: Steve Bensen, Vice President for Business Affairs NDSCS: Keith Johnson, Chief Financial Officer WSC: Riley Yadon, Chief Financial Officer Anticipated Completion Date: June 30, 2021

About Reporting →

FY 2018-06-30

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on March 25, 2019. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by September 25, 2019, which was (2521 days ago).

What is a management decision? →
2018-001
Reporting
REPEAT
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2016-002

About Reporting →
2018-002
Eligibility
REPEATMATERIAL WEAKNESSQUESTIONED COSTS
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2016-004

About Eligibility →
2018-003
Special Tests & Provisions
REPEATQUESTIONED COSTS
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2016-003

About Special Tests and Provisions →
2018-004
Eligibility
REPEATMATERIAL WEAKNESSQUESTIONED COSTS
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2016-006

About Eligibility →
2018-005
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability
REPEATQUESTIONED COSTS
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2016-008

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →
2018-006
Eligibility
REPEATMATERIAL WEAKNESSQUESTIONED COSTS
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2016-016

About Eligibility →
2018-007
Special Tests & Provisions
MATERIAL WEAKNESS
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Special Tests and Provisions →
2018-008
Subrecipient Monitoring
REPEATMATERIAL WEAKNESS
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2016-024

About Subrecipient Monitoring →
2018-009
Period of Performance
QUESTIONED COSTS
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Period of Performance →
2018-010
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability
REPEATQUESTIONED COSTS
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2016-021

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →
2018-011
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability
REPEATQUESTIONED COSTS
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2016-022

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →
2018-012
Eligibility
REPEATQUESTIONED COSTS
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2016-018, 2016-028, 2014-020, 2014-017, 2012-018, 2012-024, 2010-022, 2008-006

About Eligibility →
2018-013
Special Tests & Provisions
REPEAT
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2016-026

About Special Tests and Provisions →
2018-014
Special Tests & Provisions
REPEAT
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2016-029

About Special Tests and Provisions →
2018-015
Special Tests & Provisions
REPEATQUESTIONED COSTS
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2016-030

About Special Tests and Provisions →
2018-016
Subrecipient Monitoring
QUESTIONED COSTS
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Subrecipient Monitoring →
2018-017
Special Tests & Provisions
REPEAT
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2016-027

About Special Tests and Provisions →
2018-018
Special Tests & Provisions
REPEATQUESTIONED COSTS
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2016-025

About Special Tests and Provisions →
2018-019
Special Tests & Provisions
REPEAT
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2016-023

About Special Tests and Provisions →
2018-020
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability
QUESTIONED COSTS
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →
2018-021
Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking →
2018-022
Period of Performance
REPEATQUESTIONED COSTS
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2016-023

About Period of Performance →
2018-023
Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking
QUESTIONED COSTS
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking →
2018-024
Eligibility
REPEATQUESTIONED COSTS
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2016-044, 2016-045

About Eligibility →
2018-025
Eligibility
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Eligibility →
2018-026
Period of Performance
QUESTIONED COSTS
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Period of Performance →
2018-027
Reporting
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Reporting →
2018-028
Period of Performance
QUESTIONED COSTS
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Period of Performance →
2018-029
Subrecipient Monitoring
REPEATQUESTIONED COSTS
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2016-034

About Subrecipient Monitoring →
2018-030
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability
REPEATQUESTIONED COSTS
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2016-040

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →
2018-031
Period of Performance
REPEATQUESTIONED COSTS
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2016-053

About Period of Performance →
2018-032
Reporting
REPEAT
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2016-056

About Reporting →
2018-033
Special Tests & Provisions
REPEAT
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2016-054

About Special Tests and Provisions →
2018-034
Reporting
REPEAT
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2016-050

About Reporting →
2018-035
Subrecipient Monitoring
REPEAT
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2016-060

About Subrecipient Monitoring →
2018-036
Other
REPEAT
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2016-007

About Other →
2018-037
Subrecipient Monitoring
REPEAT
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2016-063

About Subrecipient Monitoring →
2018-038
Eligibility
QUESTIONED COSTS
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Eligibility →
2018-039
Period of Performance
QUESTIONED COSTS
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Period of Performance →
2018-040
Other
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Other →
2018-041
Subrecipient Monitoring
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Subrecipient Monitoring →
2018-042
Subrecipient Monitoring
REPEAT
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2016-068

About Subrecipient Monitoring →
2018-043
Special Tests & Provisions
REPEAT
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2016-073

About Special Tests and Provisions →
2018-044
Cost Allowability
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →
2018-046
Special Tests & Provisions
QUESTIONED COSTS
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2016-06-30

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on March 29, 2017. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by September 29, 2017, which was (3247 days ago).

What is a management decision? →
2016-001
Subrecipient Monitoring
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Subrecipient Monitoring →
2016-002
Reporting
MATERIAL WEAKNESS
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Reporting →
2016-003
Special Tests & Provisions
QUESTIONED COSTS
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Special Tests and Provisions →
2016-004
Eligibility
MATERIAL WEAKNESSQUESTIONED COSTS
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Eligibility →
2016-005
Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking
MATERIAL WEAKNESSQUESTIONED COSTS
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking →
2016-006
Eligibility
MATERIAL WEAKNESS
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Eligibility →
2016-007
Other
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Other →
2016-008
Cost Allowability
QUESTIONED COSTS
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →
2016-009
Special Tests & Provisions
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Special Tests and Provisions →
2016-010
Eligibility
QUESTIONED COSTS
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Eligibility →
2016-011
Special Tests & Provisions
QUESTIONED COSTS
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Special Tests and Provisions →
2016-012
Special Tests & Provisions
QUESTIONED COSTS
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Special Tests and Provisions →
2016-013
Special Tests & Provisions
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Special Tests and Provisions →
2016-014
Special Tests & Provisions
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Special Tests and Provisions →
2016-015
Cash Management
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Cash Management →
2016-016
Eligibility
MATERIAL WEAKNESSQUESTIONED COSTS
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Eligibility →
2016-017
Reporting
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Reporting →
2016-018
Cost Allowability / Eligibility
MATERIAL WEAKNESSQUESTIONED COSTS
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles, Eligibility →
2016-019
Cost Allowability
QUESTIONED COSTS
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →
2016-020
Cost Allowability
MATERIAL WEAKNESSQUESTIONED COSTS
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →
2016-021
Cost Allowability
QUESTIONED COSTS
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →
2016-022
Cost Allowability
QUESTIONED COSTS
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →
2016-023
Special Tests & Provisions
QUESTIONED COSTS
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Special Tests and Provisions →
2016-024
Eligibility
QUESTIONED COSTS
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Eligibility →
2016-025
Special Tests & Provisions
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Special Tests and Provisions →
2016-026
Special Tests & Provisions
QUESTIONED COSTS
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Special Tests and Provisions →
2016-027
Special Tests & Provisions
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Special Tests and Provisions →
2016-028
Eligibility
QUESTIONED COSTS
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Eligibility →
2016-029
Special Tests & Provisions
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Special Tests and Provisions →
2016-030
Special Tests & Provisions
QUESTIONED COSTS
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Special Tests and Provisions →
2016-031
Cost Allowability / Eligibility
QUESTIONED COSTS
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles, Eligibility →
2016-032
Cost Allowability
QUESTIONED COSTS
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →
2016-033
Cost Allowability
QUESTIONED COSTS
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →
2016-034
Subrecipient Monitoring
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Subrecipient Monitoring →
2016-035
Cost Allowability
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →
2016-036
Cost Allowability
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →
2016-037
Cost Allowability / Eligibility
QUESTIONED COSTS
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles, Eligibility →
2016-038
Subrecipient Monitoring
QUESTIONED COSTS
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Subrecipient Monitoring →
2016-039
Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking
QUESTIONED COSTS
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking →
2016-040
Cash Management / Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking
QUESTIONED COSTS
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Cash Management, Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking →
2016-041
Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking
QUESTIONED COSTS
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking →
2016-042
Cost Allowability
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →
2016-043
Cost Allowability
QUESTIONED COSTS
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →
2016-044
Cost Allowability / Eligibility
QUESTIONED COSTS
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles, Eligibility →
2016-045
Eligibility
QUESTIONED COSTS
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Eligibility →
2016-046
Cost Allowability / Eligibility
QUESTIONED COSTS
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles, Eligibility →
2016-047
Subrecipient Monitoring
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Subrecipient Monitoring →
2016-048
Special Tests & Provisions
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Special Tests and Provisions →
2016-049
Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking →
2016-050
Reporting
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Reporting →
2016-051
Subrecipient Monitoring
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Subrecipient Monitoring →
2016-052
Subrecipient Monitoring
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Subrecipient Monitoring →
2016-053
Period of Performance
QUESTIONED COSTS
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Period of Performance →
2016-054
Special Tests & Provisions
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Special Tests and Provisions →
2016-055
Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking →
2016-056
Reporting
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Reporting →
2016-057
Other
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Other →
2016-058
Other
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Other →
2016-059
Other
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Other →
2016-060
Subrecipient Monitoring
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Subrecipient Monitoring →
2016-061
Cash Management
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Cash Management →
2016-062
Cash Management
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Cash Management →
2016-063
Subrecipient Monitoring
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Subrecipient Monitoring →
2016-064
Subrecipient Monitoring / Special Tests & Provisions
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Subrecipient Monitoring, Special Tests and Provisions →
2016-065
Special Tests & Provisions
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Special Tests and Provisions →
2016-066
Reporting
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Reporting →
2016-067
Subrecipient Monitoring
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Subrecipient Monitoring →
2016-068
Subrecipient Monitoring
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Subrecipient Monitoring →
2016-069
Special Tests & Provisions
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Special Tests and Provisions →
2016-070
Subrecipient Monitoring
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Subrecipient Monitoring →
2016-071
Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →
2016-072
Subrecipient Monitoring
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Subrecipient Monitoring →
2016-073
Special Tests & Provisions
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Special Tests and Provisions →
2016-074
Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
QUESTIONED COSTS
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and compliance status.

Start monitoring →

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.