Community College District of Central Southwest Missouri - Ozarks Technical Community College

EIN: 431549458

UEI: DA4LJYTWYH16

Data as of August 22, 2026

Community College District of Central Southwest Missouri - Ozarks Technical Community College10 audit years8 findings3 repeat
10
Audit Years
8
Total Findings
3
Repeat Findings

FY 2022-06-30

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on January 8, 2023. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by July 8, 2023 (1141 days ago).

What is a management decision? →
2022-001
Special Tests & Provisions
REPEAT

The College did not return unearned Title IV funds within the prescribed timeframe. Context: A sample of 25 R2T4 calculations revealed that nine students had Title IV funds returned later than the allowable timeframe. All funds were returned in the proper order and amount. Effect: Title IV funds were not returned in a timely manner. Cause: The College did not have specific procedures in place to ensure timely reporting of withdraws by instructors, which in turn, did not provide enough time for the College to identify, prepare, and return funds within the required timeframe. Questioned Costs: The questioned costs would be insignificant due to the funds being returned in the proper order and amount. Repeat Finding: This is a repeat finding from the previous audit, 2021-002. Recommendation: We recommend the College implement procedures to strictly comply with the requirements of 34 CFR 668.173 as it relates to the return of Title IV funds. Response: The College has well defined policies and procedures that outline attendance requirements (policy 2.61) and the process for administratively withdrawing students (policy 2.64) who have met the criterion for 14 consecutive calendar days of non-attendance. Instructors are required to adhere to College policies. The College has systems defined for producing a report of students who have officially and unofficially withdrawn and procedures for reviewing if a return of funds calculation is required. However, changes presented to schools with the Return of Funds regulations in early summer were difficult to understand and to incorporate pertaining to the new module language. Though we provided consistent methodology in line with our interpretations of the rules, we continued to evaluate our interpretation through various instruction from FSA handbook and webinars, NASFAA University Classes, NASFAA webinars and state association colleagues. Due to our hesitation to calculate a return of funds incorrectly, we had instances where the 45 days was exceeded. With regards to our calculations and reviews, we erred on the side of taking the needed time to confirm we had the correct calculation for the student versus calculating the percentage incorrectly and causing an increased balance for the student. We followed up with the Kansas City Department of Education Office and received final clarification our understanding of the new rules

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2022-001 Special Test and Provisions - Return of Title IV Funds. Criteria: In accordance with 34 CFR 668.173(b), the College must return Title IV funds within 45 days after the date the College determined the student withdrew. Additionally, the College is considered an attendance taking school, therefore, they must make the determination that the student withdrew no later than 14 days after the student?s last date of attendance as determined by the College from its attendance records. Condition: The College did not return unearned Title IV funds within the prescribed timeframe. Context: A sample of 25 R2T4 calculations revealed that nine students had Title IV funds returned later than the allowable timeframe. All funds were returned in the proper order and amount. Effect: Title IV funds were not returned in a timely manner. Cause: The College did not have specific procedures in place to ensure timely reporting of withdraws by instructors, which in turn, did not provide enough time for the College to identify, prepare, and return funds within the required timeframe. Questioned Costs: The questioned costs would be insignificant due to the funds being returned in the proper order and amount. Repeat Finding: This is a repeat finding from the previous audit, 2021-002. Recommendation: We recommend the College implement procedures to strictly comply with the requirements of 34 CFR 668.173 as it relates to the return of Title IV funds. Response: The College has well defined policies and procedures that outline attendance requirements (policy 2.61) and the process for administratively withdrawing students (policy 2.64) who have met the criterion for 14 consecutive calendar days of non-attendance. Instructors are required to adhere to College policies. The College has systems defined for producing a report of students who have officially and unofficially withdrawn and procedures for reviewing if a return of funds calculation is required. However, changes presented to schools with the Return of Funds regulations in early summer were difficult to understand and to incorporate pertaining to the new module language. Though we provided consistent methodology in line with our interpretations of the rules, we continued to evaluate our interpretation through various instruction from FSA handbook and webinars, NASFAA University Classes, NASFAA webinars and state association colleagues. Due to our hesitation to calculate a return of funds incorrectly, we had instances where the 45 days was exceeded. With regards to our calculations and reviews, we erred on the side of taking the needed time to confirm we had the correct calculation for the student versus calculating the percentage incorrectly and causing an increased balance for the student. We followed up with the Kansas City Department of Education Office and received final clarification our understanding of the new rules

Corrective Action Plan

November 28, 2022 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Ozarks Technical Community College respectfully submits the following corrective action plan for the year ended June 30, 2022. Contact information for the individual responsible for the corrective action: Ms. Jill Cox, Interim Chief Financial Officer Ozarks Technical Community College 1001 East Chestnut Expressway Springfield, MO 65802 (417) 447-7603 Independent public accounting firm: KPM CPAs, PC, 1445 E Republic Rd, Springfield, Missouri 65804 Audit Period: Year Ended June 30, 2022 The findings from the June 30, 2022, audit of the financial statements is below. The findings are numbered with the numbers assigned in the schedule. FINDINGS-MAJOR FEDERAL AWARD PROGRAM AUDIT 2022-001 Special Test and Provisions-Return of Title IV Funds Recommendation: The College implement procedures in order to strictly comply with the requirements of 34 CFR 668,173 as it relates to the return of Title IV funds. Corrective Action Token: The College has well defined policies and procedures that outline attendance requirements (policy 2.61) and the process for administratively withdrawing students (policy 2.64) who have met the criterion for 14 consecutive calendar days of non-attendance. Instructors are required to adhere to the College policies. The College has systems defined for producing a report of students who have officially and unofficially withdrawn and procedures for reviewing if a return of funds calculation is required. However, changes presented to schools with the Return of Funds regulations in early summer were difficult to understand and to incorporate pertaining to the new module language. Though we provide consistent methodology in line with our interpretations of the rules, we continued to evaluate our interpretations through various instruction from FSA handbook and webinars, NASFAA University Classes, NASFAA webinars and state association colleagues. Due to our hesitation to calculate a return of funds incorrectly, we had instances where the 45 days was exceeded. With regards to our calculations and reviews, we erred on the side of taking the needed time to confirm we had the correct calculation for the student versus calculating the percentage incorrectly and causing an increased balance for the student. We followed up with the Kansas City Department of Education Office and received final clarification of our understanding of the new rules which we have fully incorporated into our new procedures. They were consistent with our understanding and processes. Anticipation Completion Date: Fall semester 2022 and ongoing.

Prior Finding References

2021-002

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2021-06-30

FAC accepted this audit on January 9, 2022 — management decision was due July 9, 2022.

2021-001
Special Tests & Provisions

The College did not have procedures in place to ensure change in enrollment information was accurately reported to the Department of Education within the required timeframe. Context: A sample of 40 students revealed the enrollment status level change between full time and three quarters time was not properly reported for 2 students. Effect: The College was not in compliance with the proper reporting requirements of enrollment reporting to the NSLDS. Cause: The College?s policies and procedures did not include proper internal controls over compliance to ensure that this requirement was being met. Questioned Cost: None. Recommendation: We recommend the College implement procedures to strictly comply with requirements of 34 CFR 682.610 and 34 CFR 685.309 as it relates to reporting requirements. We further recommend the College follow the guidance provided in the NSLDS Enrollment Reporting Guide and stay abreast of new guidance as published by the Department of Education. Response: The Registrar attended the NSC webinar ?Submitting Enrollment and Degree Files? in January 2021 and confirmed the College appears to be following best-practice in the submission of all enrollment reports. The College has submitted a support case with National Student Clearinghouse to discuss possible reasons why the timing of enrollment status reports were delayed and/or reported with a different change in status date. The college strives to ensure procedures are in place for timely filings and will continue to monitor this issue through resolution.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2021-001 Special Test and Provisions ? Enrollment Reporting Criteria: The U.S Department of Education requires the College to update changes in student enrollment status, report the date the enrollment status was effective, and submit changes electronically with the National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS) website in accordance with 34 CFR 682.610 and 34 CFR 685.309. Enrollment information must be reported within 30 days whenever attendance changes for students, unless a roster will be submitted within 60 days. Institutions are responsible for timely reporting, whether they report directly or via a third-party servicer. Condition: The College did not have procedures in place to ensure change in enrollment information was accurately reported to the Department of Education within the required timeframe. Context: A sample of 40 students revealed the enrollment status level change between full time and three quarters time was not properly reported for 2 students. Effect: The College was not in compliance with the proper reporting requirements of enrollment reporting to the NSLDS. Cause: The College?s policies and procedures did not include proper internal controls over compliance to ensure that this requirement was being met. Questioned Cost: None. Recommendation: We recommend the College implement procedures to strictly comply with requirements of 34 CFR 682.610 and 34 CFR 685.309 as it relates to reporting requirements. We further recommend the College follow the guidance provided in the NSLDS Enrollment Reporting Guide and stay abreast of new guidance as published by the Department of Education. Response: The Registrar attended the NSC webinar ?Submitting Enrollment and Degree Files? in January 2021 and confirmed the College appears to be following best-practice in the submission of all enrollment reports. The College has submitted a support case with National Student Clearinghouse to discuss possible reasons why the timing of enrollment status reports were delayed and/or reported with a different change in status date. The college strives to ensure procedures are in place for timely filings and will continue to monitor this issue through resolution.

Corrective Action Plan

November 30, 2021 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Ozarks Technical Community College respectfully submits the following corrective action plan for the year ended June 30, 2021. Contact information for the individual responsible for the corrective action: Ms. Sharon Day, Chief Financial Officer Ozarks Technical Community College 1001 East Chestnut Expressway Springfield, MO 65802 (417) 447-7603 Independent public accounting firm: KPM CPAs, PC, 1445 E Republic Rd, Springfield, Missouri 65804 Audit Period: Year Ended June 30, 2021 The findings from the June 30, 2021, audit of the financial statements is below. The findings are numbered with the numbers assigned in the schedule. FINDINGS- MAJOR FEDERAL AWARD PROGRAM AUDIT 2021-001 Special Testing - Enrollment Reporting Recommendation: The College implement procedures to strictly comply with requirements of 34 CFR 682.610 and 34 CFR 685.309 as it relates to reporting requirements. We further recommend the College follow the guidance provided in the NSLDS Enrollment Reporting Guide and stay abreast of new guidance as published by the Department of Education. Corrective Action Taken: The Registrar attended the NSC webinar "Submitting Enrollment and Degree Files" in January 2021 and confirmed the College appears to be following best-practice in the submission of all enrollment reports. The College has submitted a support case with National Student Clearinghouse to discuss possible reasons why the timing of enrollment stat us reports were delayed and/or reported with a different change in status date. The college strives to ensure procedures are in place for timely filings and will continue to monitor this issue through resolution. Anticipated Completion Date: Fall semester 2021 and ongoing.

About Special Tests and Provisions →
2021-002
Special Tests & Provisions

The College did not return unearned Title IV funds within the prescribed timeframe. Context: A sample of 25 R2T4 calculations revealed that two students had Title IV funds returned later than the allowable timeframe. All funds were returned in the proper order and amount. Effect: Title IV funds were not returned in a timely manner. Cause: The College did not have specific procedures in place to ensure timely reporting of withdraws by instructors, which in turn, did not provide enough time for the College to identify, prepare, and return funds within the required timeframe. Questioned Costs: The questioned costs would be insignificant due to the funds being returned in the proper order and amount. Recommendation: We recommend the College implement procedures to strictly comply with the requirements of 34 CFR 668.173 as it relates to the return of Title IV funds. Response: The College has well defined policies and procedures that outline attendance requirements (policy 2.61) and the process for administratively withdrawing students (policy 2.64) who have met the criterion for 14 consecutive calendar days of non-attendance. Instructors are required to adhere to the College policies. As referenced in 34 CFR 668.173(c)(2), ?The Secretary does not consider an institution to be out of compliance with the reserve standard under 668.173(a)(3) if the institution is cited in any audit or review report because it did not return unearned funds in a timely manner for one or two students, or for less than 5% of the students in the sample referred to in paragraph (c)(1)(i) of this section?. This audit indicates that only two students were found outside of the allowable timeframe in the sample. The College understands the necessity to reduce any issues with return of funds and will continue to work with instructors on a regular basis to adhere to the policies and procedures established to stay in compliance with these regulations.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2021-002 Special Test and Provisions ? Return of Title IV Funds Criteria: In accordance with 34 CFR 668.173(b), the College must return Title IV funds within 45 days after the date the College determined the student withdrew. Additionally, the College is considered an attendance taking school, therefore, they must make the determination that the student withdrew no later than 14 days after the student?s last date of attendance as determined by the College from its attendance records. Condition: The College did not return unearned Title IV funds within the prescribed timeframe. Context: A sample of 25 R2T4 calculations revealed that two students had Title IV funds returned later than the allowable timeframe. All funds were returned in the proper order and amount. Effect: Title IV funds were not returned in a timely manner. Cause: The College did not have specific procedures in place to ensure timely reporting of withdraws by instructors, which in turn, did not provide enough time for the College to identify, prepare, and return funds within the required timeframe. Questioned Costs: The questioned costs would be insignificant due to the funds being returned in the proper order and amount. Recommendation: We recommend the College implement procedures to strictly comply with the requirements of 34 CFR 668.173 as it relates to the return of Title IV funds. Response: The College has well defined policies and procedures that outline attendance requirements (policy 2.61) and the process for administratively withdrawing students (policy 2.64) who have met the criterion for 14 consecutive calendar days of non-attendance. Instructors are required to adhere to the College policies. As referenced in 34 CFR 668.173(c)(2), ?The Secretary does not consider an institution to be out of compliance with the reserve standard under 668.173(a)(3) if the institution is cited in any audit or review report because it did not return unearned funds in a timely manner for one or two students, or for less than 5% of the students in the sample referred to in paragraph (c)(1)(i) of this section?. This audit indicates that only two students were found outside of the allowable timeframe in the sample. The College understands the necessity to reduce any issues with return of funds and will continue to work with instructors on a regular basis to adhere to the policies and procedures established to stay in compliance with these regulations.

Corrective Action Plan

2021-002 Special Test and Provisions-Return of Title IV Funds Recommendation: The College implement procedures in order to strictly comply with the requirements of 34 CFR 668,173 as it relates to the return of Title IV funds. Corrective Action Token: The College has well defined policies and procedures that outline attendance requirements (policy 2.61) and the process for administratively withdrawing students (policy 2.64) who have met the criterion for 14 consecutive calendar days of non-attendance. Instructors are required to adhere to the College policies. As referenced in 34 CFR 668.173(c)(2), "The Secretary does not consider an institution to be out of compliance with the reserve standard under 668.173(a)(3) if the institution is cited in any audit or review report because it did not return unearned funds in a timely manner for one or two students, or for less than 5% of the students in the sample referred to in paragraph (c)(l )(i) of this section". This audit indicates that only two students were found outside of the allowable timeframe in the sample, The College understands the necessity to reduce any issues with return of funds and will continue to work with instructors on a regular basis to adhere to the policies and procedures established to stay in compliance with these regulations. Anticipated Completion Date: Ongoing.

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2019-06-30

FAC accepted this audit on January 8, 2020 — management decision was due July 8, 2020.

2019-001
Special Tests & Provisions
REPEAT

The College did not return unearned Title IV funds within the prescribed timelines. Context: A sample of 25 students required to have R2T4?s performed revealed that three students had Title IV funds returned later than 45 days after the date of determination. The first student?s Title IV funds were returned 79 days after the date of determination which was 93 days after the student?s last date of attendance. The second student?s Title IV funds were returned 53 days after the date of determination which was 67 days after the student?s last date of attendance. The third student?s Title IV funds were returned 60 days after the date of determination which was 74 days after the student?s last date of attendance. Effect: Title IV funds were not returned in a timely manner. Cause: The College did not have specific procedures in place to ensure and verify timely reporting of withdrawals by instructors which in turn did not provide enough time for the College to identify, prepare, and return funds in a timely manner. Questioned costs: At the most, questionable costs would be interest accrued which are insignificant, therefore there are no questioned costs relating to the issues noted with Title IV funds returned later than the required 45 days after the date of determination. Repeat Finding: This is a repeat finding from the previous audit, 2018-001. Recommendation: We recommend the College implement procedures in order to strictly comply with the requirements of 34 CFR 668.173 as it relates to the time requirements. Response: The College, while working with several departments such as Online, Academics, Financial Aid and Information Technology, developed additional reports during this year, which are now provided to academic leadership to assist in identifying potential issues with non-reporting or possible late reporting of last dates of attendance by instructors. Specific procedures were put into place to communicate and to follow up with completion of the last dates of attendance and administration of the Administrative Withdraw Policy and Procedures. Various attendance reporting software solutions continue to be reviewed for possible implementation and best fit with the college?s processes and student population.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2019-001 Special Tests and Provisions: Return of Title IV Funds Criteria: The U.S. Department of Education requires the College to return Title IV funds within 45 days after the date the College determined the student withdrew in accordance with 34 CFR 668.173. Condition: The College did not return unearned Title IV funds within the prescribed timelines. Context: A sample of 25 students required to have R2T4?s performed revealed that three students had Title IV funds returned later than 45 days after the date of determination. The first student?s Title IV funds were returned 79 days after the date of determination which was 93 days after the student?s last date of attendance. The second student?s Title IV funds were returned 53 days after the date of determination which was 67 days after the student?s last date of attendance. The third student?s Title IV funds were returned 60 days after the date of determination which was 74 days after the student?s last date of attendance. Effect: Title IV funds were not returned in a timely manner. Cause: The College did not have specific procedures in place to ensure and verify timely reporting of withdrawals by instructors which in turn did not provide enough time for the College to identify, prepare, and return funds in a timely manner. Questioned costs: At the most, questionable costs would be interest accrued which are insignificant, therefore there are no questioned costs relating to the issues noted with Title IV funds returned later than the required 45 days after the date of determination. Repeat Finding: This is a repeat finding from the previous audit, 2018-001. Recommendation: We recommend the College implement procedures in order to strictly comply with the requirements of 34 CFR 668.173 as it relates to the time requirements. Response: The College, while working with several departments such as Online, Academics, Financial Aid and Information Technology, developed additional reports during this year, which are now provided to academic leadership to assist in identifying potential issues with non-reporting or possible late reporting of last dates of attendance by instructors. Specific procedures were put into place to communicate and to follow up with completion of the last dates of attendance and administration of the Administrative Withdraw Policy and Procedures. Various attendance reporting software solutions continue to be reviewed for possible implementation and best fit with the college?s processes and student population.

Corrective Action Plan

2019-001 SPECIAL TESTING - RETURN OF TITLE IV FUNDS RECOMMENDATION: THE COLLEGE IMPLEMENT PROCEDURES IN ORDER TO STRICTLY COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF 34 CFR 668.173 AS IT RELATES TO THE TIME REQUIREMENTS. CORRECTIVE ACTION TAKEN: THE COLLEGE HAS DEVELOPMENT ADDITIONAL REPORTS TO BE RAN AND PROVIDED TO ACADEMIC LEADERSHIP TO ASSIST IN IDENTIFYING POTENTIAL ISSUES. SPECIFIC PROCEDURES HAVE BEEN PUT INTO PLACE TO COMMUNICATE AND FOLLOW-UP WITH COMPLETION OF THE LAST DATES OF ATTENDANCE AND ADMINISTRATION OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE WITHDRAWAL POLICY AND PROCEDURES. ADDITIONAL SOFTWARE SOLUTIONS CONTINUE TO BE REVIEWED FOR POTENTIAL IMPLEMENTATION TO THE COLLEGE'S PROCESSES. ANTICIPATED COMPLETION DATE: COMPLETED. OCTOBER 2019.

Prior Finding References

2018-001

About Special Tests and Provisions →
2019-002
Special Tests & Provisions

The College did not have procedures in place to ensure change in enrollment information was accurately being reported to the Department of Education within the required timeframe. Context: A sample of 40 students revealed that enrollment status was not reported within the required timeframe for 10 students and different effective dates were reported to NSLDS than what College records reflected for 13 students. In addition there were 2 students who did not have the proper enrollment status reported to NSLDS. Effect: The College was not in compliance with enrollment reporting to the NSLDS and the College was not in compliance with the timely reporting requirements for NSLDS reporting. Cause: The College?s policies and procedures did not include proper internal controls over compliance to ensure that these requirements were being met. Questioned costs: At the most, questionable costs would be interest accrued on the outstanding amounts of direct student loans which are insignificant, therefore there are no questioned costs. Recommendation: We recommend the College implement procedures to strictly comply with requirements of 34 CFR 685.309 and 34 CFR 682.610 as it relates to the student enrollment status date information reported to the NSLDS and timely reporting requirements. We further recommend the College follow the guidance provided in the NSLDS Enrollment Reporting Guide and stay abreast of new guidance as published by the Department of Education. Response: The College has several departments working together to review the enrollment reporting processes: Registrar, Information Technology and Financial Aid. These offices work together alongside the Clearinghouse to work through possible errors in reporting and within a designated timeline of reporting. Having multiple start times (modules) within a term, has created its own challenges as we identify additional drop and add dates to report changes to enrollment. With multiple end dates, we also have additional graduation dates. Additional review of the process has been requested; therefore, our internal auditor is preparing to assist in a broader review of the process as a whole.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2019-002 Special Tests and Provisions: Enrollment Reporting Criteria: The U.S. Department of Education requires the College to update changes in student enrollment status, report the date the enrollment status was effective, and submit changes electronically with the National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS) website in accordance with 34 CFR 682.610 and 34 CFR 685.309. Enrollment information must be reported within 30 days whenever attendance changes for students, unless a roster will be submitted within 60 days. Institutions are responsible for timely reporting, whether they report directly or via a third-party servicer. Condition: The College did not have procedures in place to ensure change in enrollment information was accurately being reported to the Department of Education within the required timeframe. Context: A sample of 40 students revealed that enrollment status was not reported within the required timeframe for 10 students and different effective dates were reported to NSLDS than what College records reflected for 13 students. In addition there were 2 students who did not have the proper enrollment status reported to NSLDS. Effect: The College was not in compliance with enrollment reporting to the NSLDS and the College was not in compliance with the timely reporting requirements for NSLDS reporting. Cause: The College?s policies and procedures did not include proper internal controls over compliance to ensure that these requirements were being met. Questioned costs: At the most, questionable costs would be interest accrued on the outstanding amounts of direct student loans which are insignificant, therefore there are no questioned costs. Recommendation: We recommend the College implement procedures to strictly comply with requirements of 34 CFR 685.309 and 34 CFR 682.610 as it relates to the student enrollment status date information reported to the NSLDS and timely reporting requirements. We further recommend the College follow the guidance provided in the NSLDS Enrollment Reporting Guide and stay abreast of new guidance as published by the Department of Education. Response: The College has several departments working together to review the enrollment reporting processes: Registrar, Information Technology and Financial Aid. These offices work together alongside the Clearinghouse to work through possible errors in reporting and within a designated timeline of reporting. Having multiple start times (modules) within a term, has created its own challenges as we identify additional drop and add dates to report changes to enrollment. With multiple end dates, we also have additional graduation dates. Additional review of the process has been requested; therefore, our internal auditor is preparing to assist in a broader review of the process as a whole.

Corrective Action Plan

2019-002 SPECIAL TESTING - ENROLLMENT REPORTING RECOMMENDATION: THE COLLEGE IMPLEMENT PROCEDURES TO STRICTLY COMPLY WITH REQUIREMENTS OF 34 CFR 685.309 AND 34 CFR 682.610 AS IT RELATES TO THE STUDENT ENROLLMENT STATUS DATE INFORMATION REPORTED TO THE NSLDS AND TIMELY REPORTING REQUIREMENTS. WE FURTHER RECOMMEND THE COLLEGE FOLLOW THE GUIDANCE PROVIDED IN THE NSLDS ENROLLMENT REPORTING GUIDE AND STAY ABREAST OF NEW GUIDANCE AS PUBLISHED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION. CORRECTIVE ACTION TAKEN: THE COLLEGE IS WORKING WITH SEVERAL DEPARTMENTS TO REVIEW THE ENROLLMENT REPORTING PROCESSES. CURRENT PROCESSES ARE BEING UPDATED TO REFLECT THE CHALLENGES CREATED WITH MULTIPLE MODULES OCCURRING WITHIN THE SAME TERM. ADDITIONAL REVIEW OF THE PROCESS HAS BEEN REQUESTED TO BE PERFORMED BY THE INTERNAL AUDITOR. ANTICIPATED COMPLETION DATE: APRIL 2020.

About Special Tests and Provisions →
2019-003
Special Tests & Provisions

The College has procedures in place to return any Title IV funds returned or rejected within the required time frame, but these procedures were not followed due to an ongoing federal program review. Context: Discussion with College personnel noted these returned or rejected funds were still being monitored, but were not being returned to the U.S. Department of Education until the Final Federal Program Review was completed. Cause: The College was undergoing a federal program review and had been instructed to halt all return of funds to the U.S. Department of Education until the federal program review was completed. Questioned costs: None as all funds were being monitored and were released back to the U.S. Department of Education upon completion of the federal program review. Recommendation: We recommend the College implement procedures to strictly comply with the requirements of 34 CFR 668.164(1) as it relates to the return of any Title IV funds returned or rejected within the required 240 days after the date of the initial attempt to disburse funds to the student. Response: The College has procedures in place to align with the 240 day requirement to return unclaimed or rejected Title IV funds. Procedures outline both Student Account Services and Financial Aid responsibilities.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2019-003 Special Tests and Provisions: Disbursements to or on Behalf of Students Criteria: The U.S. Department of Education requires the College to return any Title IV funds, except Federal Work Study funds, that it attempts to disburse directly to a student which are returned or rejected no later than 240 days from the initial attempt to disburse the funds. Condition: The College has procedures in place to return any Title IV funds returned or rejected within the required time frame, but these procedures were not followed due to an ongoing federal program review. Context: Discussion with College personnel noted these returned or rejected funds were still being monitored, but were not being returned to the U.S. Department of Education until the Final Federal Program Review was completed. Cause: The College was undergoing a federal program review and had been instructed to halt all return of funds to the U.S. Department of Education until the federal program review was completed. Questioned costs: None as all funds were being monitored and were released back to the U.S. Department of Education upon completion of the federal program review. Recommendation: We recommend the College implement procedures to strictly comply with the requirements of 34 CFR 668.164(1) as it relates to the return of any Title IV funds returned or rejected within the required 240 days after the date of the initial attempt to disburse funds to the student. Response: The College has procedures in place to align with the 240 day requirement to return unclaimed or rejected Title IV funds. Procedures outline both Student Account Services and Financial Aid responsibilities.

Corrective Action Plan

2019-003 SPECIAL TESTING - DISBURSEMENTS TO OR ON BEHALF OF STUDENTS RECOMMENDATION: THE COLLEGE IMPLEMENT PROCEDURES TO STRICTLY COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF 34 CFR 668.164(1) AS IT RELATES TO THE RETURN OF ANY TITLE IV FUNDS RETURNED OR REJECTED WITHIN THE REQUIRED 240 DAYS AFTER THE DATE OF THE INITIAL ATTEMPT TO DISBURSE FUNDS TO THE STUDENT. CORRECTIVE ACTION TAKEN: THE COLLEGE NOW HAS PROCEDURES IN PLACE TO ALIGN WITH THE 240 DAY REQUIREMENT TO RETURN UNCLAIMED OR REJECTED TITLE IV FUNDS. PROCEDURES OUTLINE BOTH STUDENT ACCOUNT SERVICES AND FINANCIAL AID RESPONSIBILITIES. ANTICIPATED COMPLETION DATE: COMPLETED. THIS WAS COMPLETED AFTER THE FINALIZED FEDERAL PROGRAM REVIEW DETERMINATION WAS ISSUED.

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2018-06-30

FAC accepted this audit on January 15, 2019 — management decision was due July 15, 2019.

2018-001
Special Tests & Provisions
MATERIAL WEAKNESS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2016-06-30

FAC accepted this audit on January 19, 2017 — management decision was due July 19, 2017.

2016-001
Special Tests & Provisions
REPEAT

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2015-001, 2015-002

About Special Tests and Provisions →

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and compliance status.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.