United States Hispanic Chamber of CommerceNon-Profit

EIN: 431249249

UEI: N3D6CDJS13W3

Audited by: CBIZ CPAs P.C.

Oversight agency: 59 [Small Business Administration]

Data as of August 27, 2026

United States Hispanic Chamber of Commerce3 audit years2 findings
3
Audit Years
2
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings

FY 2023-12-31

$1,963,207 federal awards expended

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on September 20, 2024. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by March 20, 2025 (526 days ago).

What is a management decision? →
2023-001
Reporting
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

Finding No. 2023-001: Compliance Finding – Reporting and Significant Deficiency of Internal Controls Over Compliance – ASLN 59.077, U.S. Small Business Administration Criteria In accordance with the Uniform Guidance, the audit package and the Data Collection Form must be submitted within 30 days after the receipt of the auditors’ report or nine months after the end of the fiscal year, whichever comes first. Condition The auditor’s report was issued on January 5, 2024, causing the Data Collection Form submission to occur beyond the nine-month reporting deadline. Context The Data Collection Form for the year ended December 31, 2022 was not submitted to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse by the September 30, 2023 deadline. Cause The prior auditors communicated to management that their audit reporting would be delayed due to internal staffing changes. Effect Management did not fully adhere to the reporting requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Repeat Finding No Recommendation Prior to engaging an auditor, we recommend that management, to the best of its ability, evaluate the capabilities and resources of the auditor to evaluate whether the auditor will be able to issue their report before the deadline. Further, management should coordinate with their auditor on a timetable to complete the audit that allows for sufficient time to address uncertainties that may not be known upon commencing the audit. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See corrective action plan.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding No. 2023-001: Compliance Finding – Reporting and Significant Deficiency of Internal Controls Over Compliance – ASLN 59.077, U.S. Small Business Administration Criteria In accordance with the Uniform Guidance, the audit package and the Data Collection Form must be submitted within 30 days after the receipt of the auditors’ report or nine months after the end of the fiscal year, whichever comes first. Condition The auditor’s report was issued on January 5, 2024, causing the Data Collection Form submission to occur beyond the nine-month reporting deadline. Context The Data Collection Form for the year ended December 31, 2022 was not submitted to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse by the September 30, 2023 deadline. Cause The prior auditors communicated to management that their audit reporting would be delayed due to internal staffing changes. Effect Management did not fully adhere to the reporting requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Repeat Finding No Recommendation Prior to engaging an auditor, we recommend that management, to the best of its ability, evaluate the capabilities and resources of the auditor to evaluate whether the auditor will be able to issue their report before the deadline. Further, management should coordinate with their auditor on a timetable to complete the audit that allows for sufficient time to address uncertainties that may not be known upon commencing the audit. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See corrective action plan.

Corrective Action Plan

USHCC management has always evaluated the capabilities and resources of the audit firms and their auditors prior to engagement. Unfortunately, USHCC management had no control over internal issues within the audit firm that caused the audit FY2022 reports to be delayed. USHCC management has addressed the issue and contracted with a different firm establishing a timeline and maintaining frequent communication to ensure that the FY2023 reports are submitted in a timely manner.

About Reporting →

FY 2022-12-31

$2,269,044 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on February 2, 2024 — management decision was due August 2, 2024.

2022-001
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name: Assistance Listing Number 59.077, U.S. Small Business Administration Federal Award Identification Number and Year: SBAHQ22CNP0003, Grant Period 12/01/2021-11/30/2023 Pass-through Entity - N/A Finding Type - Significant deficiency in internal control over suspension and debarment compliance Repeat Finding - No Criteria - Section 14 of the U.S. Small Business Administration grant agreement noted that the Hub cannot use project funds to pay salaries of employees or costs of consultants, contractors or other service providers where such entities are currently suspended or debarred. The Hub is responsible for verifying those entities paid or (where applicable) assisted with project funds or project resources are not suspended. To determine if an individual or firm is suspended or debarred, the Hub may consult the System for Award management (https://www.sam.gov/). Additionally, Section 14 of the grant agreement refer for further guidance regarding suspension and debarment to 2 CFR Part 180 and 2700. According to 2 CFR Part 180.300 covered transaction entered with a vendor/contractor at the next lower tier, USHCC must verify the vendor/contractor with whom USHCC intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. USHCC do this by a) checking SAM exclusions, b) collecting a certification from that vendor/contractor, c) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that vendor/contractor. Condition - During testing of suspension and debarment requirement for activities allowed/unallowed, allowed costs/cost principles and procurement compliances, it was noted that USHCC did not provide proof of evidence that verification for suspension and debarment was performed and maintained through the System of Award Management. USHCC provided an internal company generated memo which states that the federal requirements have been followed. However, the internal document does not rise to a sufficient and appropriate audit evident to demonstrate that USHCC consulted with System of Award Management as required by U.S. Small Business Administration. Identification of How Likely Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Know Questioned Costs - None - Upon review of the excluded parties listing as part of the audit process, it was determined that none of the parties that were awarded procurements were excluded parties. Context - USHCC hired contractors or vendors to provide goods or services with federal funding but did not have audit evidence that USHCC consulted with System of Award Management as required by U.S. Small Business Administration for any of the contractors or vendors. Effect - The effect of the finding is that failure to monitor suspension and debarment could cause funds to be disbursed to vendors or contractors who are not eligible to have goods purchased and services with federal monies. Cause - Management did not have sufficient documentation in place to ensure there is proper audit trail for the suspension and debarment compliance. Recommendation - We recommend internal control procedures should be strengthened and enforced to ensure that the appropriate suspension and debarment verifications are performed and maintained for all vendors or contractors providing goods and services.View of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan – Management selected and presented contractors with proposals that were included in the original CNPP grant application and were approved by SBA prior to any disbursement of funds. Management also contemporaneously signed a memo attesting that each and every contractor hired for the CNPP program was verified to be eligible to provide services with to be procured with federal funds. This verification was done in SAM.gov searching for exclusions but the related documentation (i.e. screenshots) was not saved. However, Management has already updated its internal controls beginning of 2023 and now maintains each screenshot of suspension debarment verification performed in SAM.gov.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name: Assistance Listing Number 59.077, U.S. Small Business Administration Federal Award Identification Number and Year: SBAHQ22CNP0003, Grant Period 12/01/2021-11/30/2023 Pass-through Entity - N/A Finding Type - Significant deficiency in internal control over suspension and debarment compliance Repeat Finding - No Criteria - Section 14 of the U.S. Small Business Administration grant agreement noted that the Hub cannot use project funds to pay salaries of employees or costs of consultants, contractors or other service providers where such entities are currently suspended or debarred. The Hub is responsible for verifying those entities paid or (where applicable) assisted with project funds or project resources are not suspended. To determine if an individual or firm is suspended or debarred, the Hub may consult the System for Award management (https://www.sam.gov/). Additionally, Section 14 of the grant agreement refer for further guidance regarding suspension and debarment to 2 CFR Part 180 and 2700. According to 2 CFR Part 180.300 covered transaction entered with a vendor/contractor at the next lower tier, USHCC must verify the vendor/contractor with whom USHCC intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. USHCC do this by a) checking SAM exclusions, b) collecting a certification from that vendor/contractor, c) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that vendor/contractor. Condition - During testing of suspension and debarment requirement for activities allowed/unallowed, allowed costs/cost principles and procurement compliances, it was noted that USHCC did not provide proof of evidence that verification for suspension and debarment was performed and maintained through the System of Award Management. USHCC provided an internal company generated memo which states that the federal requirements have been followed. However, the internal document does not rise to a sufficient and appropriate audit evident to demonstrate that USHCC consulted with System of Award Management as required by U.S. Small Business Administration. Identification of How Likely Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Know Questioned Costs - None - Upon review of the excluded parties listing as part of the audit process, it was determined that none of the parties that were awarded procurements were excluded parties. Context - USHCC hired contractors or vendors to provide goods or services with federal funding but did not have audit evidence that USHCC consulted with System of Award Management as required by U.S. Small Business Administration for any of the contractors or vendors. Effect - The effect of the finding is that failure to monitor suspension and debarment could cause funds to be disbursed to vendors or contractors who are not eligible to have goods purchased and services with federal monies. Cause - Management did not have sufficient documentation in place to ensure there is proper audit trail for the suspension and debarment compliance. Recommendation - We recommend internal control procedures should be strengthened and enforced to ensure that the appropriate suspension and debarment verifications are performed and maintained for all vendors or contractors providing goods and services.View of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan – Management selected and presented contractors with proposals that were included in the original CNPP grant application and were approved by SBA prior to any disbursement of funds. Management also contemporaneously signed a memo attesting that each and every contractor hired for the CNPP program was verified to be eligible to provide services with to be procured with federal funds. This verification was done in SAM.gov searching for exclusions but the related documentation (i.e. screenshots) was not saved. However, Management has already updated its internal controls beginning of 2023 and now maintains each screenshot of suspension debarment verification performed in SAM.gov.

Corrective Action Plan

View of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan – Management selected and presented contractors with proposals that were included in the original CNPP grant application and were approved by SBA prior to any disbursement of funds. Management also contemporaneously signed a memo attesting that each and every contractor hired for the CNPP program was verified to be eligible to provide services with to be procured with federal funds. This verification was done in SAM.gov searching for exclusions but the related documentation (i.e. screenshots) was not saved. However, Management has already updated its internal controls beginning of 2023 and now maintains each screenshot of suspension debarment verification performed in SAM.gov.

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.