COLLINS-MAXWELL COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICTLocal Government

EIN: 426036681

UEI: THLFF2XAJEH3

Audited by: BOHNSACK & FROMMELT LLP

Oversight agency: 84 [Department of Education]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of August 28, 2026

COLLINS-MAXWELL COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICT1 audit years2 findings
1
Audit Years
2
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings

FY 2022-06-30

MATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$836,780 federal awards expended

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on June 28, 2023. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by December 28, 2023 (974 days ago).

What is a management decision? →
2022-007
Cost Allowability
MODIFIED OPINION

The District charged the Education Stabilization Fund program $259,073. The description in the general ledger is for furniture costs for the middle school and high school construction project. The District was unable to provide documentation supporting the amount charged and could not provide documentation of furniture purchases for this project. Cause: A journal entry was posted to allocate expenditures from a non-federal project code to the project code assigned to the Education Stabilization award. There is no documentation for the journal entry. There is no documentation for the amount charged or documentation of furniture purchases. Effect: Costs charged to the program are not properly documented. The program expenditures are not allowable costs. Questioned costs: $259,073Context: Total program expenditures are $356,885. The questioned costs represent 73 percent of the program expenditures for fiscal year June 30, 2022. Identification as a repeat finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend the District charge the program direct costs which are specifically tied to invoices of expenditures incurred. We recommend the District require journal entries to be supported by adequate documentation such that the amounts of the journal entry can be traced to source documents.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding: The District was unable to substantiate charges to the Education Stabilization Fund program Criteria: The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) 2022 Compliance Supplement specifically states the Education Stabilization Fund federal program is required to fall the cost principles in 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart E. The OMB 2022 Compliance Supplement, Part 3.B. Allowable Costs/Cost Principles states under Basic Guidelines, ??.7. Be adequately documented.? Condition: The District charged the Education Stabilization Fund program $259,073. The description in the general ledger is for furniture costs for the middle school and high school construction project. The District was unable to provide documentation supporting the amount charged and could not provide documentation of furniture purchases for this project. Cause: A journal entry was posted to allocate expenditures from a non-federal project code to the project code assigned to the Education Stabilization award. There is no documentation for the journal entry. There is no documentation for the amount charged or documentation of furniture purchases. Effect: Costs charged to the program are not properly documented. The program expenditures are not allowable costs. Questioned costs: $259,073Context: Total program expenditures are $356,885. The questioned costs represent 73 percent of the program expenditures for fiscal year June 30, 2022. Identification as a repeat finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend the District charge the program direct costs which are specifically tied to invoices of expenditures incurred. We recommend the District require journal entries to be supported by adequate documentation such that the amounts of the journal entry can be traced to source documents.

Corrective Action Plan

Response and Corrective Action Plan: The District will ensure charges to federal programs are properly documented by maintaining supporting documentation such as invoices or other source documents. Sherri Ruzek.

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →
2022-008
Cost Allowability
MATERIAL WEAKNESS

Access to the master vendor file is not limited. One position has access to initiate, approve, enter invoices to be paid, print checks with contain the authorized signers and reconciles bank statements. The same position posts journal entries to the general ledger. The journal entry posted to the program for furniture costs was not properly documented. Cause: There has been significant turnover in the Business Office. Procedures have not been properly designed to limit access rights and responsibilities in the cash disbursement cycle. Effect: Misappropriations of assets or errors could occur and not be detected in a timely manner. Federal program costs are not allowable. Context: The deficiency is over all disbursement transactions of the District including federal awards. Identification as a repeat finding: This is not a repeat finding of the program. Recommendation: In general, authorization of new vendors, purchasing, entering invoices into the accounting system, and processing of checks and electronic funds transfers should be segregated from each other. The following are recommendations to strengthen the District?s internal control system: ? Access to edit the master vendor file should be limited to a position without access to accounts payable processing. ? Check sequence should be formally tracked by a position independent of the cash disbursement function to ensure all checks are appropriately approved and accounted. Theposition accounting for check sequence should also ensure all checks accounted for are on the bill listing provided to the Board for review each month. ? A separate position should obtain the checks printed and match all invoices to the check stubs. This individual should attach the stub to the invoice and prepare the checks for mailing. This individual should also obtain the electronic funds transfer report and compare to the invoices and to the total for the bank transfer. ? Journal entries should be prepared by one employee and be properly documented to substantiate the purpose and the amounts posted. Another employee should review the entry and approve prior to posting.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding: The District has insufficient segregation of duties over the disbursement process for federal programs. Criteria: A good internal control contemplates an adequate segregation of duties so that no one individual handles a transaction from inception to completion. Condition: Access to the master vendor file is not limited. One position has access to initiate, approve, enter invoices to be paid, print checks with contain the authorized signers and reconciles bank statements. The same position posts journal entries to the general ledger. The journal entry posted to the program for furniture costs was not properly documented. Cause: There has been significant turnover in the Business Office. Procedures have not been properly designed to limit access rights and responsibilities in the cash disbursement cycle. Effect: Misappropriations of assets or errors could occur and not be detected in a timely manner. Federal program costs are not allowable. Context: The deficiency is over all disbursement transactions of the District including federal awards. Identification as a repeat finding: This is not a repeat finding of the program. Recommendation: In general, authorization of new vendors, purchasing, entering invoices into the accounting system, and processing of checks and electronic funds transfers should be segregated from each other. The following are recommendations to strengthen the District?s internal control system: ? Access to edit the master vendor file should be limited to a position without access to accounts payable processing. ? Check sequence should be formally tracked by a position independent of the cash disbursement function to ensure all checks are appropriately approved and accounted. Theposition accounting for check sequence should also ensure all checks accounted for are on the bill listing provided to the Board for review each month. ? A separate position should obtain the checks printed and match all invoices to the check stubs. This individual should attach the stub to the invoice and prepare the checks for mailing. This individual should also obtain the electronic funds transfer report and compare to the invoices and to the total for the bank transfer. ? Journal entries should be prepared by one employee and be properly documented to substantiate the purpose and the amounts posted. Another employee should review the entry and approve prior to posting.

Corrective Action Plan

Response and Corrective Action Plan: The District will review current processes and realign duties and system access levels to improve internal controls within the design of the receipt system. Sherri Ruzek.

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.