EIN: 426004194
UEI: ZW2CJQ44XED9
Data as of August 25, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on December 5, 2024. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by June 5, 2025 (446 days ago).
What is a management decision? →Special Tests and Provision Criteria – The basic requirement for use of airport revenue is that all revenues generated by a public airport must be expended for the capital or operating costs of the airport and the local airport system. The City should have a proper written policy in regards to how airport revenue is to be spent. Condition – The City did not establish a written policy for the use of airport revenue. However, the City has established a separate set of general ledger accounts specifically to segregate airport revenues and expenses. While no written policy exists, the City has maintained proper tracking to ensure revenue is spent according to the terms and conditions of the grant. Cause – The City’s management was not aware that they needed to have a written policy regarding airport revenue. Effect – The City is not in compliance with Federal regulations pertaining special tests and provisions as required by the Uniform Guidance. Recommendation – The City should establish a written policy for the use of airport revenue. Corrective Action – The City will establish a written policy for the use of airport revenue. Conclusion – Response accepted.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Special Tests and Provision Criteria – The basic requirement for use of airport revenue is that all revenues generated by a public airport must be expended for the capital or operating costs of the airport and the local airport system. The City should have a proper written policy in regards to how airport revenue is to be spent. Condition – The City did not establish a written policy for the use of airport revenue. However, the City has established a separate set of general ledger accounts specifically to segregate airport revenues and expenses. While no written policy exists, the City has maintained proper tracking to ensure revenue is spent according to the terms and conditions of the grant. Cause – The City’s management was not aware that they needed to have a written policy regarding airport revenue. Effect – The City is not in compliance with Federal regulations pertaining special tests and provisions as required by the Uniform Guidance. Recommendation – The City should establish a written policy for the use of airport revenue. Corrective Action – The City will establish a written policy for the use of airport revenue. Conclusion – Response accepted.
The City will establish a policy for the use of airport revenue.
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Monitor subrecipient audit findings and compliance status.
Start monitoring →© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.