EIN: 396005714
UEI: Q42YFLAKWZN9
Data as of August 26, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on September 29, 2022. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by March 29, 2023 (1246 days ago).
What is a management decision? →There was no review of the reports and claims for reimbursement by someone other than the preparer for grants within the social services department. Accordingly, this does not allow for proper segregation of duties for internal control purposes over reporting compliance requirements. Questioned costs: None Context: While performing audit procedures, it was noted that management does not have internal controls in place to provide and document proper segregation of duties over grant reporting for the social services SPARC and DHS income maintenance grants. Cause: The department and the positions responsible for preparing, reviewing, and approving the report are combined for one person resulting in the missed reporting control requirements. Effect: Information could be mis-keyed or potentially altered if there is no segregation of duties or review of reporting before being sent to the granting agency. Repeat finding: Yes Recommendation: We recommend the County review its written procedures to ensure there are adequate controls over reporting to prevent or detect error. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Refer to the management response per the corrective action plan.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Reporting ? Social Services State/federal agency: Department of Children & Families, Department of Health Services State/federal program title: Youth Aids, Medicaid Cluster State ID/ Assistance Listing Number: 437.3413, 93.778 Award Period: January 1, 2021 ? December 31, 2021 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria or specific requirement: The grant claims filed by the County to the various granting agencies must be accurate, reconcile to the County general ledger system, and for cost-reimbursement grants, represent costs incurred. Internal controls should be designed and implemented to prevent and detect errors in the data reported on the grant claims. Segregation of duties is an internal control intended to prevent or decrease the occurrence of errors or intentional fraud. Segregation of duties ensures that no single employee has control over all phases of a transaction. Condition: There was no review of the reports and claims for reimbursement by someone other than the preparer for grants within the social services department. Accordingly, this does not allow for proper segregation of duties for internal control purposes over reporting compliance requirements. Questioned costs: None Context: While performing audit procedures, it was noted that management does not have internal controls in place to provide and document proper segregation of duties over grant reporting for the social services SPARC and DHS income maintenance grants. Cause: The department and the positions responsible for preparing, reviewing, and approving the report are combined for one person resulting in the missed reporting control requirements. Effect: Information could be mis-keyed or potentially altered if there is no segregation of duties or review of reporting before being sent to the granting agency. Repeat finding: Yes Recommendation: We recommend the County review its written procedures to ensure there are adequate controls over reporting to prevent or detect error. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Refer to the management response per the corrective action plan.
Medicaid Cluster ? Assistance Listing No. 93.778 Recommendation: We recommend the County review its written procedures to ensure there are adequate controls over reporting to prevent or detect error. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: Revise the written procedure to have reviews performed by program coordinators who primarily work on site and will be able to perform the reviews. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Sarah Brandner Planned completion date for corrective action plan: October 31, 2022
2020-002
There was no review of the journal entries by someone other than the preparer for grants within the social services department. Accordingly, this does not allow for a proper segregation of duties for internal control purposes over allowable costs and activities compliance requirements. Questioned costs: None Context: While performing audit procedures, it was noted that management does not have internal controls in place to provide and document proper segregation of duties over journal entries coded to certain grant programs for the social services SPARC and income maintenance grants. Cause: The finance staff within the social services department consists of only one person who has responsibility over adjusting the general ledger for the department. Effect: If the County incurred under budgeted costs for the year, the County could receive grant funds it was not entitled to under the grant agreement. Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the County review its written procedures to ensure there are adequate controls over journal entry reviews. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Refer to the management response per the corrective action plan.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Allowable Costs ? Social Services Journal Entries State agency: Department of Children & Families, Department of Health Services State program title: Youth Aids, Medicaid Cluster State ID Number: 437.3413, 93.778 Award Period: January 1, 2021 ? December 31, 2021 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria or specific requirement: In order to ensure all costs coded to a grant are accurate and allowable, internal controls should be designed and implemented to prevent and detect errors in the underlying costs and activities. Segregation of duties is an internal control intended to prevent or decrease the occurrence of error or intentional fraud. Segregation of duties ensures that no single employee has control over all phases of a transaction. Condition: There was no review of the journal entries by someone other than the preparer for grants within the social services department. Accordingly, this does not allow for a proper segregation of duties for internal control purposes over allowable costs and activities compliance requirements. Questioned costs: None Context: While performing audit procedures, it was noted that management does not have internal controls in place to provide and document proper segregation of duties over journal entries coded to certain grant programs for the social services SPARC and income maintenance grants. Cause: The finance staff within the social services department consists of only one person who has responsibility over adjusting the general ledger for the department. Effect: If the County incurred under budgeted costs for the year, the County could receive grant funds it was not entitled to under the grant agreement. Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the County review its written procedures to ensure there are adequate controls over journal entry reviews. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Refer to the management response per the corrective action plan.
Medicaid Cluster ? Assistance Listing No. 93.778 Recommendation: We recommend the County review its written procedures to ensure there are adequate controls over journal entry reviews. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: Revise the written procedure to have reviews performed by program coordinators who primarily work on site and will be able to perform the reviews. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Sarah Brandner Planned completion date for corrective action plan: October 31, 2022
FAC accepted this audit on September 27, 2018 — management decision was due March 27, 2019.
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
2016-001
FAC accepted this audit on September 27, 2017 — management decision was due March 27, 2018.
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
2015-001
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Monitor subrecipient audit findings and compliance status.
Start monitoring →© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.