EIN: 391866425
UEI: PCV1WJVKG4L5
Data as of August 26, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on March 27, 2022. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by September 27, 2022 (1429 days ago).
What is a management decision? →For certain professional staff, effort reports supporting payroll expenditures charged to the R&D Cluster were not certified monthly in accordance with Hospital Cost Principles. Additionally, the review and approval of effort reports by an individual knowledgeable of the professional staff activities was not performed on a timely basis. We further noted, for one employee who charged his time between a federal and nonfederal research grant, effort reports were not prepared during the fiscal year as required by Hospital Cost Principles. Cause: Although Gundersen Health System has designed internal controls over effort reporting, including an effort reporting form that is required to be submitted to Accounting by the second business day after month-end, submission of certified effort reports was not monitored to ensure they were submitted timely. Questioned costs: $16,890 (Assistance Listing 93.310 ? $6,238; Assistance Listing 93.395 ? $2,936; Assistance Listing 93.399 ? $7,716) Context: We selected 40 payroll transactions (totaling $171,987 in salaries/wages and benefits) for testing of allowability of payroll expenditures related to the R&D Cluster major program. Of these payroll transactions, eight payroll transactions (totaling $16,890 in salaries/wages and benefits) had exceptions as follows: ? Five payroll transactions had an associated monthly effort report that was not certified within one month after the month in which the services were performed. Certification was completed between four months and nine months after the month for which the effort report covered. ? Three payroll transactions related to the same employee did not have an effort report. Total personnel costs for the R&D Cluster are $1,049,395, representing 65% of the total R&D Cluster expenditures of $1,625,797 for the year ended December 31, 2020. Effect or potential effect: Payroll and benefit expenses were charged to the R&D Cluster that were not supported by monthly effort reports. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: This is a repeat finding. Recommendation: Gundersen Health System should review its internal controls over effort reporting and strengthen existing procedures over the preparation and timely certification of effort reports to support the allowability of expenditures to comply with the federal allowable costs/cost principles compliance requirement. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding and has developed a plan to correct the finding.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Finding 2020-001 ? Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles (Effort Reporting) Information on the federal program: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Pass-Through Entity: Marshfield Clinic Research Institute U.S. Department of Defense Research and Development (R&D) Cluster CFDA Nos.: 93.310, 93.395 and 93.399 Award Years: Various Award Nos.: Various Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory, or other citation): The Uniform Guidance 2 CFR section 200.303 states, ?The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework,? issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).? Sections I.2.g(2) and (3) of 45 CFR Part 75, Appendix IX, Principles for Determining Costs Applicable to Research and Development Under Grants and Contracts with Hospitals (Hospital Cost Principles), state: ?(2) Payroll Distribution Amounts charged to organized research for personal services, regardless of whether treated as direct costs or allocated as indirect costs, will be based on hospital payrolls which have been approved and documented in accordance with generally accepted hospital practices. In order to develop necessary direct and indirect allocations of cost, supplementary data on time or effort as provided in paragraph (3) below, normally need be required only for individuals whose compensation is properly chargeable to two or more research agreements or to two or more of the following broad functional categories: (i) Patient care; (ii) organized research; (iii) instruction and training; (iv) indirect activities as defined in paragraph E.1.; or (v) other hospital activities as defined in paragraph B.5. (3) Reporting Time or Effort Charges for salaries and wages of individuals other than members of the professional staff will be supported by daily time and attendance and payroll distribution records. For members of the professional staff, current and reasonable estimates of the percentage distribution of their total effort may be used as support in the absence of actual time records. The term professional staff for purposes of this section includes physicians, research associates, and other personnel performing work at responsible levels of activities. These personnel normally fulfill duties, the competent performance of which usually requires persons possessing degrees from accredited institutions of higher learning and/or state licensure. In order to qualify as current and reasonable, estimates must be made no later than one month (though not necessarily a calendar month) after the month in which the services were performed.? Condition: For certain professional staff, effort reports supporting payroll expenditures charged to the R&D Cluster were not certified monthly in accordance with Hospital Cost Principles. Additionally, the review and approval of effort reports by an individual knowledgeable of the professional staff activities was not performed on a timely basis. We further noted, for one employee who charged his time between a federal and nonfederal research grant, effort reports were not prepared during the fiscal year as required by Hospital Cost Principles. Cause: Although Gundersen Health System has designed internal controls over effort reporting, including an effort reporting form that is required to be submitted to Accounting by the second business day after month-end, submission of certified effort reports was not monitored to ensure they were submitted timely. Questioned costs: $16,890 (Assistance Listing 93.310 ? $6,238; Assistance Listing 93.395 ? $2,936; Assistance Listing 93.399 ? $7,716) Context: We selected 40 payroll transactions (totaling $171,987 in salaries/wages and benefits) for testing of allowability of payroll expenditures related to the R&D Cluster major program. Of these payroll transactions, eight payroll transactions (totaling $16,890 in salaries/wages and benefits) had exceptions as follows: ? Five payroll transactions had an associated monthly effort report that was not certified within one month after the month in which the services were performed. Certification was completed between four months and nine months after the month for which the effort report covered. ? Three payroll transactions related to the same employee did not have an effort report. Total personnel costs for the R&D Cluster are $1,049,395, representing 65% of the total R&D Cluster expenditures of $1,625,797 for the year ended December 31, 2020. Effect or potential effect: Payroll and benefit expenses were charged to the R&D Cluster that were not supported by monthly effort reports. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: This is a repeat finding. Recommendation: Gundersen Health System should review its internal controls over effort reporting and strengthen existing procedures over the preparation and timely certification of effort reports to support the allowability of expenditures to comply with the federal allowable costs/cost principles compliance requirement. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding and has developed a plan to correct the finding.
Finding 2020-001 ? Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles (Effort Reporting) Information on the Federal Program U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Pass-Through Entity: Marshfield Clinic Research Institute U.S. Department of Defense Research and Development (R&D) Cluster CFDA Nos.: 12.420, 93.310 and 93.395 Award Years: Various Award Nos.: Various Corrective Action Planned Gundersen Health System Effort Certification Revitalization Plan To ensure that time is logged and certified for all employees being paid through grant funding in a timely and appropriate manner, GHS has implemented two procedures across all grants. When a grant that includes staff time is awarded, the Grant Coordinator will work with the respective PI/PD and payroll to determine which staff are hourly and which are salary. All grant sponsored hourly employees are required to log their hours in Kronos, which allows employees to record daily time and attendance worked on research or grant activities. Information on the Kronos process, including the proper activity code and accounting unit to use, and relevant dates for completion are shared with the departmental leaders whose staff work on the grant. The Grant Coordinator is also available to assist with the process when required. If issues are encountered with timeliness of hour tracking, the Grant Coordinator will work with the Project Director for each grant, or the applicable next level leader if necessary, to spark adoption. For salary personnel, an automated system is used for all time certifications. Through an online survey software system, each grant-sponsored salary employee receives an automated message on the 15th of each month. This survey determines if the percentage of time they will be working in the current month matches the grant allocated amount. Any differences can be noted in a write-in box, and the form is then electronically signed for certification. A similar survey is sent to the grant?s Project Director each month on the 20th, with the phrasing altered to ensure they are certifying the time of all employees paid under the grant. Data is exported for each grant in an Excel format, and includes a unique identifier for each respondent. The survey platform also allows for reminder messages to employees with an outstanding survey each month, though we are confident this will not be necessary after seeing the adoption rate in the two-month trial period that has been completed. A key feature of this platform is the ease of use for respondents. The automated message includes a hyperlink that sends the user directly to their individual survey without a required log in, and the survey itself can be completed in moments. This new process for salaried employees started to be implemented in 4th quarter of 2020 with full integration of effort certification for all grants in the beginning of 2021. Person Responsible for Corrective Action Tobias C. Wolf, Grants Manager Completion Date January 1, 2021
2019-001
Gundersen did not retain audit evidence to support the report logic that was developed to identify patients from the patient billing system who were identified as uninsured and as having an allowable COVID-19 testing and treatment or vaccination in accordance with the terms of the federal program. A risk exists that the data relevant to the COVID-19 Uninsured Program stored within the patient accounting system may be inappropriately created or modified. Evidence of the operation of controls identified to address this risk during the fiscal period under audit was not retained. In addition, supporting documentation was not retained to validate who had access to modify the report script, what changes were made to the script during the fiscal year, and how management validated the completeness and accuracy of the data extracted by the script. Cause: Management did not retain sufficient supporting documentation to provide evidence that controls over data integrity for this major program were designed effectively and placed in operation during the period under audit. Effect or potential effect: Evidence of controls addressing the risk that data within the patient accounting system may be inappropriately created or modified was not retained. The report used to identify eligible federal program participants could be inaccurate or incomplete or patients could be inappropriately identified as eligible, services could be reimbursed by HRSA for unallowable charges, or patients could be inappropriately billed for services that HRSA reimbursed under this program. Questioned costs: None. Context: Total federal expenditures for Assistance Listing 93.461 totaled $450,815 for the year ended December 31, 2020. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: The is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: Management should retain documentation of the operation of controls responsive to risks related to the data stored in its IT systems as evidence of control activities. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding and has developed a plan to correct the finding.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴2020-002 ? Internal Controls Over Testing for the Uninsured Identification of the federal program: Assistance Listing: 93.461 Program Name: COVID-19 Testing, Treatment and Vaccination for the Uninsured Program (Uninsured Program) Federal Agency: Department of Health and Human Services Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory, or other citation): Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance states the following regarding internal control: ?The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework?, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).? Condition: Gundersen did not retain audit evidence to support the report logic that was developed to identify patients from the patient billing system who were identified as uninsured and as having an allowable COVID-19 testing and treatment or vaccination in accordance with the terms of the federal program. A risk exists that the data relevant to the COVID-19 Uninsured Program stored within the patient accounting system may be inappropriately created or modified. Evidence of the operation of controls identified to address this risk during the fiscal period under audit was not retained. In addition, supporting documentation was not retained to validate who had access to modify the report script, what changes were made to the script during the fiscal year, and how management validated the completeness and accuracy of the data extracted by the script. Cause: Management did not retain sufficient supporting documentation to provide evidence that controls over data integrity for this major program were designed effectively and placed in operation during the period under audit. Effect or potential effect: Evidence of controls addressing the risk that data within the patient accounting system may be inappropriately created or modified was not retained. The report used to identify eligible federal program participants could be inaccurate or incomplete or patients could be inappropriately identified as eligible, services could be reimbursed by HRSA for unallowable charges, or patients could be inappropriately billed for services that HRSA reimbursed under this program. Questioned costs: None. Context: Total federal expenditures for Assistance Listing 93.461 totaled $450,815 for the year ended December 31, 2020. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: The is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: Management should retain documentation of the operation of controls responsive to risks related to the data stored in its IT systems as evidence of control activities. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding and has developed a plan to correct the finding.
Finding 2020-002 ? Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles (Effort Reporting) Information on the Federal Program CFDA No: 93.461 Program Name: COVID-19 Testing for the Uninsured Federal Agency: Department of Health and Human Services Corrective Action Planned Due to the evolving nature of the COVID-19 pandemic, and the rapid pace in which programs were implemented, documentation of controls related to the reporting of COVID-19 uninsured patients was not maintained. However, proper submission of claims was accurate. Gundersen will document implemented internal controls related to access and change management over the report and quality review process of eligible claims identified to ensure that patients identified meet the required eligibility requirements. Person Responsible for Corrective Action Kay Marsyla, Director, Reimbursement Completion Date January 1, 2021
FAC accepted this audit on December 28, 2020 — management decision was due June 28, 2021.
For certain professional staff, effort reports supporting payroll expenditures charged to the R&D Cluster were not certified monthly in accordance with Hospital Cost Principles. Additionally, the review and approval of effort reports by an individual knowledgeable of the professional staff activities was not performed on a timely basis. We further noted, for one employee that charged his time between a federal and nonfederal research grant, effort reports were not prepared during the fiscal year as required by Hospital Cost Principles. Cause: Although Gundersen Health System has designed internal controls over effort reporting including, an effort reporting form that is required to be submitted to Accounting by the second business day after month-end, submission of certified effort reports was not monitored to ensure they were submitted timely. Questioned Costs: $17,924 (CFDA No. 12.420 ? $8,053; CFDA No. 93.310 ? $8,050; CFDA No. 93.395 ? $1,821) Context: We selected 40 payroll transactions (totaling $121,929 in salaries/wages and benefits) for testing of allowability of payroll expenditures related to the R&D Cluster major program. Of these payroll transactions, eight payroll transactions (totaling $17,924 in salaries/wages and benefits) had exceptions as follows: ? Six payroll transactions had an associated monthly effort report that was not certified within one month after the month in which the services were performed. Certification were completed between four months and nine months after the month for which the effort report covered. ? Two payroll transactions related to the same employee did not have an effort report prepared. Total personnel costs for the R&D Cluster was $741,569, representing 73% of total R&D Cluster expenditures of $1,011,961 for the year ended December 31, 2019. Effect or Potential Effect: Payroll and benefit expenses were charged to the R&D Cluster that was not supported by monthly effort reports. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: Gundersen Health System should review its internal controls over effort reporting and strengthen existing procedures over the preparation and timely certification of effort reports to support the allowability of expenditures to comply with the federal allowable costs/cost principles compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding and has developed a plan to correct the finding.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Finding 2019-001 ? Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles (Effort Reporting) Information on the Federal Program: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Pass-Through Entity: Marshfield Clinic Research Institute U.S. Department of Defense Research and Development (R&D) Cluster CFDA Nos.: 12.420, 93.310 and 93.395 Award Years: Various Award Nos.: Various Criteria or Specific Requirement (Including Statutory, Regulatory, or Other Citation): The Uniform Guidance 2 CFR section 200.303 states, ?The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework,? issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).? Sections I.2.g(2) and (3) of 45 CFR Part 75, Appendix IX, Principles for Determining Costs Applicable to Research and Development Under Grants and Contracts with Hospitals (Hospital Cost Principles), state: (2) Payroll Distribution Amounts charged to organized research for personal services, regardless of whether treated as direct costs or allocated as indirect costs, will be based on hospital payrolls which have been approved and documented in accordance with generally accepted hospital practices. In order to develop necessary direct and indirect allocations of cost, supplementary data on time or effort as provided in paragraph (3) below, normally need be required only for individuals whose compensation is properly chargeable to two or more research agreements or to two or more of the following broad functional categories: (i) Patient care; (ii) organized research; (iii) instruction and training; (iv) indirect activities as defined in paragraph E.1.; or (v) other hospital activities as defined in paragraph B.5. (3) Reporting Time or Effort Charges for salaries and wages of individuals other than members of the professional staff will be supported by daily time and attendance and payroll distribution records. For members of the professional staff, current and reasonable estimates of the percentage distribution of their total effort may be used as support in the absence of actual time records. The term professional staff for purposes of this section includes physicians, research associates, and other personnel performing work at responsible levels of activities. These personnel normally fulfill duties, the competent performance of which usually requires persons possessing degrees from accredited institutions of higher learning and/or state licensure. In order to qualify as current and reasonable, estimates must be made no later than one month (though not necessarily a calendar month) after the month in which the services were performed.? Condition: For certain professional staff, effort reports supporting payroll expenditures charged to the R&D Cluster were not certified monthly in accordance with Hospital Cost Principles. Additionally, the review and approval of effort reports by an individual knowledgeable of the professional staff activities was not performed on a timely basis. We further noted, for one employee that charged his time between a federal and nonfederal research grant, effort reports were not prepared during the fiscal year as required by Hospital Cost Principles. Cause: Although Gundersen Health System has designed internal controls over effort reporting including, an effort reporting form that is required to be submitted to Accounting by the second business day after month-end, submission of certified effort reports was not monitored to ensure they were submitted timely. Questioned Costs: $17,924 (CFDA No. 12.420 ? $8,053; CFDA No. 93.310 ? $8,050; CFDA No. 93.395 ? $1,821) Context: We selected 40 payroll transactions (totaling $121,929 in salaries/wages and benefits) for testing of allowability of payroll expenditures related to the R&D Cluster major program. Of these payroll transactions, eight payroll transactions (totaling $17,924 in salaries/wages and benefits) had exceptions as follows: ? Six payroll transactions had an associated monthly effort report that was not certified within one month after the month in which the services were performed. Certification were completed between four months and nine months after the month for which the effort report covered. ? Two payroll transactions related to the same employee did not have an effort report prepared. Total personnel costs for the R&D Cluster was $741,569, representing 73% of total R&D Cluster expenditures of $1,011,961 for the year ended December 31, 2019. Effect or Potential Effect: Payroll and benefit expenses were charged to the R&D Cluster that was not supported by monthly effort reports. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: Gundersen Health System should review its internal controls over effort reporting and strengthen existing procedures over the preparation and timely certification of effort reports to support the allowability of expenditures to comply with the federal allowable costs/cost principles compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding and has developed a plan to correct the finding.
Finding 2019-001 ? Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles (Effort Reporting) Information on the Federal Program U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Pass-Through Entity: Marshfield Clinic Research Institute U.S. Department of Defense Research and Development (R&D) Cluster CFDA Nos.: 12.420, 93.310 and 93.395 Award Years: Various Award Nos.: Various Corrective Action Planned Gundersen Health System Effort Certification Revitalization Plan To ensure that time is logged and certified for all employees being paid through grant funding in a timely and appropriate manner, we are in the process of implementing two new procedures across all grants. In January 2021, we will begin moving all grant sponsored hourly employees to logging their hours in Kronos, which will allow employees to record daily time and attendance worked on research. Each employee will receive a message highlighting the process and relevant dates they need to complete the process by. We are confident that this new procedure will be achievable for all employees. If issues are encountered with timeliness of hour tracking, we will be working with the Project Director for each grant, or the applicable next level leader, if necessary, to spark adoption. For salary personnel, an automated system has been implemented for all time certification. Through an online survey software system, each grant sponsored salary employee will receive an automated message on the 15th of each month. This survey determines if the percentage of time they will be working in the current month matches the grant allocated amount. Any differences can be noted in a write in box, and the form is then electronically signed for certification. A similar survey is sent to the grant?s Project Director each month on the 20th, with the phrasing altered to ensure they are certifying the time of all employees paid under the grant. Data can be exported for each grant in an Excel format, and includes a unique identifier for each respondent. The survey platform also allows for reminder messages to employees with an outstanding survey each month, though we are confident this will not be necessary after seeing the adoption rate in the two-month trial period that has been completed. A key feature of this platform is the ease of use for respondents. The automated message includes a hyperlink that sends the user directly to their individual survey without a required log in, and the survey itself can be completed in moments. For fiscal year 2020, we will ensure that certifications are obtained for all hourly and salaried employees by January 31, 2021. Person Responsible for Corrective Action Tobias C. Wolf, Grants Manager Anticipated Completion Date January 1, 2021 for hourly staff to utilize Kronos time system and salary staff to utilize the MedHub system for timely time and effort certifications and September 2021 for updated and approved written procedures and guidelines.
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Monitor subrecipient audit findings and compliance status.
Start monitoring →© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.