TH, INC

EIN: 391796538

UEI: VSWEEK6CJK13

Data as of August 21, 2026

TH, INC3 audit years6 findings6 repeat
3
Audit Years
6
Total Findings
6
Repeat Findings

FY 2024-12-31

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on March 20, 2025. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by September 20, 2025 (336 days ago).

What is a management decision? →
2024-001
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability / Period of Performance / Special Tests & Provisions
REPEAT

The Organization’s internal control system does not reliably and consistently produce adjustments to bring the accounting records into compliance with generally accepted accounting principles. Additionally, the Organization does not have a system of internal controls in place that would enable management to conclude the financial statements and related disclosures are complete and presented in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). This is not unusual in organizations of this size. Criteria: The Organization’s accounting records should comply with generally accepted accounting principles and the Organization should have internal controls in place to provide reasonable assurance that management takes responsibility for the financial statements. Context: The organization outsources the drafting of the financial statements to ensure they are prepared in conformity with GAAP. Cause: Several account balances are not adjusted for accruals throughout the year; rather, adjustments to those account balances are proposed at year end by auditors. The Organization’s management does not have the internal controls in place to ensure financial statements would be prepared in conformity with GAAP without outsourcing these services to experienced accountants. Effect: Significant journal entries were identified, proposed, and recorded during the audit to bring the accounting records in compliance with generally accepted accounting principles. Interim financial statements may be unreliable and inconsistent with yearend results. Because of the outsourcing of drafting the financial statements, the Organization’s management relies upon an accounting firm to draft the financial statements and related disclosures. Recommendation: We recommend the Organization adopt policies and procedures to ensure the accounting records are in compliance with generally accepted accounting principles. Additionally, procedures should remain for requiring the Organization’s management to review the drafted financial statements with the accounting firm and take responsibility for the finalized financial statements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The Organization is recording more activity on the accrual basis of accounting and will continue to review its policies and procedures related to producing accounting records in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. The Organization recognizes management’s responsibility for the financial statements despite being drafted by an accounting firm due to the Organization’s small size and limited staff. Procedures have been formalized for Administrator and Board oversight.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Condition: The Organization’s internal control system does not reliably and consistently produce adjustments to bring the accounting records into compliance with generally accepted accounting principles. Additionally, the Organization does not have a system of internal controls in place that would enable management to conclude the financial statements and related disclosures are complete and presented in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). This is not unusual in organizations of this size. Criteria: The Organization’s accounting records should comply with generally accepted accounting principles and the Organization should have internal controls in place to provide reasonable assurance that management takes responsibility for the financial statements. Context: The organization outsources the drafting of the financial statements to ensure they are prepared in conformity with GAAP. Cause: Several account balances are not adjusted for accruals throughout the year; rather, adjustments to those account balances are proposed at year end by auditors. The Organization’s management does not have the internal controls in place to ensure financial statements would be prepared in conformity with GAAP without outsourcing these services to experienced accountants. Effect: Significant journal entries were identified, proposed, and recorded during the audit to bring the accounting records in compliance with generally accepted accounting principles. Interim financial statements may be unreliable and inconsistent with yearend results. Because of the outsourcing of drafting the financial statements, the Organization’s management relies upon an accounting firm to draft the financial statements and related disclosures. Recommendation: We recommend the Organization adopt policies and procedures to ensure the accounting records are in compliance with generally accepted accounting principles. Additionally, procedures should remain for requiring the Organization’s management to review the drafted financial statements with the accounting firm and take responsibility for the finalized financial statements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The Organization is recording more activity on the accrual basis of accounting and will continue to review its policies and procedures related to producing accounting records in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. The Organization recognizes management’s responsibility for the financial statements despite being drafted by an accounting firm due to the Organization’s small size and limited staff. Procedures have been formalized for Administrator and Board oversight.

Corrective Action Plan

Recommendation: We recommend the Organization adopt policies and procedures to ensure the accounting records are in compliance with generally accepted accounting principles. Additionally, procedures should remain for requiring the Organization’s management to review the drafted financial statements with the accounting firm and take responsibility for the finalized financial statements. Management Response: TH, Inc's Administrator and Board recognize their responsibility for the financial statements. The following procedures have become written policy: - The administrator reviews and approves invoices and statements as they come in. -The Bookkeeper processes invoices and statements weekly, processing checks every other week. - A Board member and Administrator review and approve the checks and direct payments every other week. - Electronic payments are reviewed and approved monthly by a Board member and Administrator. - All financial reports are reviewed and approved by the Board at the monthly Board meetings.

Prior Finding References

2023-001

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles, Period of Performance, Special Tests and Provisions →
2024-002
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability / Period of Performance / Special Tests & Provisions
REPEAT

The size of the office staff precludes optimal segregation of accounting functions to assure adequate internal control. The condition is not unusual in non-profit entities this size. Criteria: Internal controls should be in place so no one person handles a transaction from beginning to end and incompatible duties between functions are not handled by the same person. Context: The Organization has limited office staff performing multiple accounting duties. Cause: The Organization finds it unnecessary, due to its size, to have a large office staff in place to segregate all of the accounting functions. The cost does not outweigh the benefit at this time. Effect: Because of the small office staff, the entity relies on a limited number of individuals to handle all the accounting functions. Recommendation: Management and Board of Directors should remain aware of this situation and continue to monitor the various functions of the office staff and review detail reports to improve reliance on information prepared. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Management and the Board of Directors will continue to monitor the accounting function. Management and Board of Directors continue to review financial transactions at board meetings. Procedures have been formalized for Administrator and Board oversight.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Condition: The size of the office staff precludes optimal segregation of accounting functions to assure adequate internal control. The condition is not unusual in non-profit entities this size. Criteria: Internal controls should be in place so no one person handles a transaction from beginning to end and incompatible duties between functions are not handled by the same person. Context: The Organization has limited office staff performing multiple accounting duties. Cause: The Organization finds it unnecessary, due to its size, to have a large office staff in place to segregate all of the accounting functions. The cost does not outweigh the benefit at this time. Effect: Because of the small office staff, the entity relies on a limited number of individuals to handle all the accounting functions. Recommendation: Management and Board of Directors should remain aware of this situation and continue to monitor the various functions of the office staff and review detail reports to improve reliance on information prepared. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Management and the Board of Directors will continue to monitor the accounting function. Management and Board of Directors continue to review financial transactions at board meetings. Procedures have been formalized for Administrator and Board oversight.

Corrective Action Plan

Recommendation: Management and Board of Directors should remain aware of this situation and continue to monitor the various functions of the office staff and review detail reports to improve reliance on information prepared. Management Response: TH, Inc’s Administrator and Board will continue to monitor the accounting process. The following procedures have become written policy: All checks received are recorded in the appropriate deposit book by the Administrative Assistant. All deposits are reviewed by the Administrator. The Administrator makes the deposit at the bank. The Bookkeeper reviews and compares deposit totals with the online bank activity. The Administrator and Bookkeeper review monthly paper bank statements together. The Board reviews the financial reports, which includes monthly check register activity.

Prior Finding References

2023-002

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles, Period of Performance, Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2023-12-31

FAC accepted this audit on April 22, 2024 — management decision was due October 22, 2024.

2023-001
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability / Period of Performance / Special Tests & Provisions
REPEAT

The Organization’s internal control system does not reliably and consistently produce adjustments to bring the accounting records into compliance with generally accepted accounting principles. Additionally, the Organization does not have a system of internal controls in place that would enable management to conclude the financial statements and related disclosures are complete and presented in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). This is not unusual in organizations of this size. Criteria: The Organization’s accounting records should comply with generally accepted accounting principles and the Organization should have internal controls in place to provide reasonable assurance that management takes responsibility for the financial statements. Context: The organization outsources the drafting of the financial statements to ensure they are prepared in conformity with GAAP. Cause: Several account balances are not adjusted for accruals throughout the year; rather, adjustments to those account balances are proposed at year end by auditors. The Organization’s management does not have the internal controls in place to ensure financial statements would be prepared in conformity with GAAP without outsourcing these services to experienced accountants. Effect: Significant journal entries were identified, proposed, and recorded during the audit to bring the accounting records in compliance with generally accepted accounting principles. Interim financial statements may be unreliable and inconsistent with yearend results. Because of the outsourcing of drafting the financial statements, the Organization’s management relies upon an accounting firm to draft the financial statements and related disclosures. Recommendation: We recommend the Organization adopt policies and procedures to ensure the accounting records are in compliance with generally accepted accounting principles. Additionally, procedures should remain for requiring the Organization’s management to review the drafted financial statements with the accounting firm and take responsibility for the finalized financial statements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The Organization is recording more activity on the accrual basis of accounting and will continue to review its policies and procedures related to producing accounting records in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. The Organization recognizes management’s responsibility for the financial statements despite being drafted by an accounting firm due to the Organization’s small size and limited staff. Procedures have been formalized for Administrator and Board oversight.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Condition: The Organization’s internal control system does not reliably and consistently produce adjustments to bring the accounting records into compliance with generally accepted accounting principles. Additionally, the Organization does not have a system of internal controls in place that would enable management to conclude the financial statements and related disclosures are complete and presented in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). This is not unusual in organizations of this size. Criteria: The Organization’s accounting records should comply with generally accepted accounting principles and the Organization should have internal controls in place to provide reasonable assurance that management takes responsibility for the financial statements. Context: The organization outsources the drafting of the financial statements to ensure they are prepared in conformity with GAAP. Cause: Several account balances are not adjusted for accruals throughout the year; rather, adjustments to those account balances are proposed at year end by auditors. The Organization’s management does not have the internal controls in place to ensure financial statements would be prepared in conformity with GAAP without outsourcing these services to experienced accountants. Effect: Significant journal entries were identified, proposed, and recorded during the audit to bring the accounting records in compliance with generally accepted accounting principles. Interim financial statements may be unreliable and inconsistent with yearend results. Because of the outsourcing of drafting the financial statements, the Organization’s management relies upon an accounting firm to draft the financial statements and related disclosures. Recommendation: We recommend the Organization adopt policies and procedures to ensure the accounting records are in compliance with generally accepted accounting principles. Additionally, procedures should remain for requiring the Organization’s management to review the drafted financial statements with the accounting firm and take responsibility for the finalized financial statements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The Organization is recording more activity on the accrual basis of accounting and will continue to review its policies and procedures related to producing accounting records in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. The Organization recognizes management’s responsibility for the financial statements despite being drafted by an accounting firm due to the Organization’s small size and limited staff. Procedures have been formalized for Administrator and Board oversight.

Corrective Action Plan

Recommendation: We recommend the Organization adopt policies and procedures to ensure the accounting records are in compliance with generally accepted accounting principles. Additionally, procedures should remain for requiring the Organization’s management to review the drafted financial statements with the accounting firm and take responsibility for the finalized financial statements. Management Response: TH, Inc’s Administrator and Boad recognize their responsibility for the financial statements. The following procedures have become written policy: The Administrator reviews and approves invoices and statements as they come in; the Bookkeeper processes invoices and statements weekly, processing checks every other week; a Board member and Administrator review and approve the checks and direct payments every other week; electronic payments are reviewed and approved monthly by a Board member and Administrator; all financial reports are reviewed and approved by the Board at the monthly Board meetings.

Prior Finding References

2022-001

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles, Period of Performance, Special Tests and Provisions →
2023-002
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability / Period of Performance / Special Tests & Provisions
REPEAT

The size of the office staff precludes optimal segregation of accounting functions to assure adequate internal control. The condition is not unusual in non-profit entities this size. Criteria: Internal controls should be in place so no one person handles a transaction from beginning to end and incompatible duties between functions are not handled by the same person. Context: The Organization has limited office staff performing multiple accounting duties. Cause: The Organization finds it unnecessary, due to its size, to have a large office staff in place to segregate all of the accounting functions. The cost does not outweigh the benefit at this time. Effect: Because of the small office staff, the entity relies on a limited number of individuals to handle all the accounting functions. Recommendation: Management and Board of Directors should remain aware of this situation and continue to monitor the various functions of the office staff and review detail reports to improve reliance on information prepared.Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Management and the Board of Directors will continue to monitor the accounting function. Management and Board of Directors continue to review financial transactions at board meetings. Procedures have been formalized for Administrator and Board oversight.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Condition: The size of the office staff precludes optimal segregation of accounting functions to assure adequate internal control. The condition is not unusual in non-profit entities this size. Criteria: Internal controls should be in place so no one person handles a transaction from beginning to end and incompatible duties between functions are not handled by the same person. Context: The Organization has limited office staff performing multiple accounting duties. Cause: The Organization finds it unnecessary, due to its size, to have a large office staff in place to segregate all of the accounting functions. The cost does not outweigh the benefit at this time. Effect: Because of the small office staff, the entity relies on a limited number of individuals to handle all the accounting functions. Recommendation: Management and Board of Directors should remain aware of this situation and continue to monitor the various functions of the office staff and review detail reports to improve reliance on information prepared.Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Management and the Board of Directors will continue to monitor the accounting function. Management and Board of Directors continue to review financial transactions at board meetings. Procedures have been formalized for Administrator and Board oversight.

Corrective Action Plan

Recommendation: Management and Board of Directors should remain aware of this situation and continue to monitor the various functions of the office staff and review detail reports to improve reliance on information prepared. Management Response: TH, Inc’s Administrator and Board will continue to monitor the accounting process. The following procedures have become written policy: all checks received are recorded in the appropriate deposit book by the Administrative Assistant; all deposits are reviewed by the Administrator; the Administrator makes the deposit at the bank; the Bookkeeper reviews and compares deposit totals with the online bank activity; the Administrator and Bookkeeper review monthly paper bank statements together; the Board reviews the financial reports, which includes monthly check register activity.

Prior Finding References

2023-002

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles, Period of Performance, Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2022-12-31

FAC accepted this audit on October 25, 2023 — management decision was due April 25, 2024.

2022-001
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability / Period of Performance / Reporting / Special Tests & Provisions
REPEAT

The Organization’s internal control system does not reliably and consistently produce adjustments to bring the accounting records into compliance with generally accepted accounting principles. Additionally, the Organization does not have a system of internal controls in place that would enable management to conclude the financial statements and related disclosures are complete and presented in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). This is not unusual in organizations of this size. Criteria: The Organization’s accounting records should comply with generally accepted accounting principles and the Organization should have internal controls in place to provide reasonable assurance that management takes responsibility for the financial statements. Context: The organization outsources the drafting of the financial statements to ensure they are prepared in conformity with GAAP. Cause: Several account balances are not adjusted for accruals throughout the year; rather, adjustments to those account balances are proposed at year end by auditors. The Organization’s management does not have the internal controls in place to ensure financial statements would be prepared in conformity with GAAP without outsourcing these services to experienced accountants. Effect: Significant journal entries were identified, proposed, and recorded during the audit to bring the accounting records in compliance with generally accepted accounting principles. Interim financial statements may be unreliable and inconsistent with yearend results. Because of the outsourcing of drafting the financial statements, the Organization’s management relies upon an accounting firm to draft the financial statements and related disclosures. Recommendation: We recommend the Organization adopt policies and procedures to ensure the accounting records are in compliance with generally accepted accounting principles. Additionally, procedures should remain for requiring the Organization’s management to review the drafted financial statements with the accounting firm and take responsibility for the finalized financial statements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The Organization is recording more activity on the accrual basis of accounting and will continue to review its policies and procedures related to producing accounting records in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. The Organization recognizes management’s responsibility for the financial statements despite being drafted by an accounting firm due the Organization’s small size and limited staff.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Condition: The Organization’s internal control system does not reliably and consistently produce adjustments to bring the accounting records into compliance with generally accepted accounting principles. Additionally, the Organization does not have a system of internal controls in place that would enable management to conclude the financial statements and related disclosures are complete and presented in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). This is not unusual in organizations of this size. Criteria: The Organization’s accounting records should comply with generally accepted accounting principles and the Organization should have internal controls in place to provide reasonable assurance that management takes responsibility for the financial statements. Context: The organization outsources the drafting of the financial statements to ensure they are prepared in conformity with GAAP. Cause: Several account balances are not adjusted for accruals throughout the year; rather, adjustments to those account balances are proposed at year end by auditors. The Organization’s management does not have the internal controls in place to ensure financial statements would be prepared in conformity with GAAP without outsourcing these services to experienced accountants. Effect: Significant journal entries were identified, proposed, and recorded during the audit to bring the accounting records in compliance with generally accepted accounting principles. Interim financial statements may be unreliable and inconsistent with yearend results. Because of the outsourcing of drafting the financial statements, the Organization’s management relies upon an accounting firm to draft the financial statements and related disclosures. Recommendation: We recommend the Organization adopt policies and procedures to ensure the accounting records are in compliance with generally accepted accounting principles. Additionally, procedures should remain for requiring the Organization’s management to review the drafted financial statements with the accounting firm and take responsibility for the finalized financial statements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The Organization is recording more activity on the accrual basis of accounting and will continue to review its policies and procedures related to producing accounting records in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. The Organization recognizes management’s responsibility for the financial statements despite being drafted by an accounting firm due the Organization’s small size and limited staff.

Corrective Action Plan

THE OGANIZATION IS RECORDING MORE ACTIVITY ON THE ACCRUAL BASIS OF ACCOUNTING AND WILL CONTINUE TO REVIEW ITS POLICIES AND PROCEDURES RELATED TO PRODUCING ACCOUNTING RECORDS IN ACCORDANCE WITH GENERALLY ACCEPTED ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES. THE ORGANIZATION RECOGNIZES MANAGEMENT'S RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DESPITE BEING DRAFTED BY AN ACCOUNTING FIRM DUE THE ORGANIZATION'S SMALL SIZE AND LIMITED STAFF.

Prior Finding References

2021-001

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles, Period of Performance, Reporting, Special Tests and Provisions →
2022-002
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability / Period of Performance / Reporting / Special Tests & Provisions
REPEAT

The size of the office staff precludes optimal segregation of accounting functions to assure adequate internal control. The condition is not unusual in non-profit entities this size. Criteria: Internal controls should be in place so no one person handles a transaction from beginning to end and incompatible duties between functions are not handled by the same person. Context: The Organization has limited office staff performing multiple accounting duties. Cause: The Organization finds it unnecessary, due to its size, to have a large office staff in place to segregate all of the accounting functions. The cost does not outweigh the benefit at this time. Effect: Because of the small office staff, the entity relies on a limited number of individuals to handle all the accounting functions. Recommendation: Management and Board of Directors should remain aware of this situation and continue to monitor the various functions of the office staff and review detail reports to improve reliance on information prepared. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Management and the Board of Directors will continue to monitor the accounting function. Management and Board of Directors review financial transactions at board meetings.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Condition: The size of the office staff precludes optimal segregation of accounting functions to assure adequate internal control. The condition is not unusual in non-profit entities this size. Criteria: Internal controls should be in place so no one person handles a transaction from beginning to end and incompatible duties between functions are not handled by the same person. Context: The Organization has limited office staff performing multiple accounting duties. Cause: The Organization finds it unnecessary, due to its size, to have a large office staff in place to segregate all of the accounting functions. The cost does not outweigh the benefit at this time. Effect: Because of the small office staff, the entity relies on a limited number of individuals to handle all the accounting functions. Recommendation: Management and Board of Directors should remain aware of this situation and continue to monitor the various functions of the office staff and review detail reports to improve reliance on information prepared. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Management and the Board of Directors will continue to monitor the accounting function. Management and Board of Directors review financial transactions at board meetings.

Corrective Action Plan

MANAGEMENT AND THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS WILL CONTINUE TO MONITOR THE ACCOUNTING FUNCTION. MANAGEMENT AND BOARD OF DIRECTORS REVIEW FINANCIAL TRANSACTIONS AT BOARD MEETINGS.

Prior Finding References

2021-002

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles, Period of Performance, Reporting, Special Tests and Provisions →

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and compliance status.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.