EIN: 381550064
UEI: HFE2JCCPH9U9
Data as of August 23, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on December 3, 2024. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by June 3, 2025 (446 days ago).
What is a management decision? →Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - U.S. Department of Education, Student Financial Assistance Cluster - ALN 84.268, Federal Direct Student Loans; ALN 84.063, Federal Pell Grant Program Federal Award Identification Number and Year - P268K222849, P063P212849 Pass through Entity - N/A Finding Type - Significant deficiency Repeat Finding - No Criteria - Changes in a student's status are required to be reported accurately to the National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS) or the guarantee agency (Pell, 34 CFR Section 690.83(b)(2); Direct Loan, 34 CFR Section 685.309). Condition - The College did not accurately report the effective date of a students' status changes to the NSLDS or the correct status change to the NSLDS. Questioned Costs - N/A Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - Of the 60 students selected for enrollment reporting testing, the effective date of the status change or the correct status for 4 students was not accurately reported. Cause and Effect - The College prepares enrollment reporting based on known student status changes. The College did not report the correct effective date for 3 students and the correct status for 1 student, resulting in a violation of accurate reporting requirements within the NSLDS. The College did not have a control in place to verify that the correct effective date was reported to NSLDS in the required time frame. Recommendation - The University should implement controls to ensure that the accurate effective date or status is reported to the NSLDS. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan - Before pulling the enrolled student list for submission to the National Student Clearinghouse (NSC), the director of financial aid will run a debugging process created by the financial aid and information technology teams to identify any inaccuracies in student enrollment status to be easily identified and corrected. Implementing this debugging process in advance of finalizing the NSC Student Enrollment Report file will ensure all data submitted to NSC is accurate.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - U.S. Department of Education, Student Financial Assistance Cluster - ALN 84.268, Federal Direct Student Loans; ALN 84.063, Federal Pell Grant Program Federal Award Identification Number and Year - P268K222849, P063P212849 Pass through Entity - N/A Finding Type - Significant deficiency Repeat Finding - No Criteria - Changes in a student's status are required to be reported accurately to the National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS) or the guarantee agency (Pell, 34 CFR Section 690.83(b)(2); Direct Loan, 34 CFR Section 685.309). Condition - The College did not accurately report the effective date of a students' status changes to the NSLDS or the correct status change to the NSLDS. Questioned Costs - N/A Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - Of the 60 students selected for enrollment reporting testing, the effective date of the status change or the correct status for 4 students was not accurately reported. Cause and Effect - The College prepares enrollment reporting based on known student status changes. The College did not report the correct effective date for 3 students and the correct status for 1 student, resulting in a violation of accurate reporting requirements within the NSLDS. The College did not have a control in place to verify that the correct effective date was reported to NSLDS in the required time frame. Recommendation - The University should implement controls to ensure that the accurate effective date or status is reported to the NSLDS. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan - Before pulling the enrolled student list for submission to the National Student Clearinghouse (NSC), the director of financial aid will run a debugging process created by the financial aid and information technology teams to identify any inaccuracies in student enrollment status to be easily identified and corrected. Implementing this debugging process in advance of finalizing the NSC Student Enrollment Report file will ensure all data submitted to NSC is accurate.
Condition: The College did not accurately report the effective date of a students' status changes to the NSLDS or the correct status change to the NSLDS. Planned Corrective Action: Before pulling the enrolled student list for submission to the National Student Clearinghouse (NSC), the Director of Financial Aid will run a debugging process created by the Financial Aid and Information Technology teams to identify any inaccuracies in student enrollment status to be easily identified and corrected. Implementing this debugging process in advance of finalizing the NSC Student Enrollment Report file will ensure all data submitted to NSC is accurate. Contact person responsible for corrective action: Mathew Catanese, Director of Financial Aid Anticipated Completion Date: June 30, 2025
FAC accepted this audit on March 9, 2021 — management decision was due September 9, 2021.
CFDA Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - Student Financial Assistance Cluster, Department of Education - CFDA No. 84.268, Federal Direct Student Loans and CFDA 84.063, Federal Pell Grant Program Federal Award Identification Number and Year - P268K202849 (2020), P063P192849 (2020) Pass through Entity - N/A Finding Type - Material weakness Repeat Finding - No Criteria - According to 34 CFR Section 685.309 for Direct Loans and Section 690.83 for Pell, changes in a student's status are required to be reported to the National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS) within 30 days of the College's determination of a change or included in a student status confirmation report sent to NSLDS within 60 days of the College's determination of the status change. Condition - Certain student status changes were not reported to the NSLDS within 60 days. Questioned Costs - None Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - Of the 40 student status changes selected for enrollment reporting testing, including 15 graduations and 25 other status changes, status changes were not reported timely for 15 students. The status changes that were not reported timely related to students with status changes other than graduations. Cause and Effect - Several enrollment reports generated for submission to the NSLDS throughout the year did not accurately reflect student status changes occurring throughout the semester. As a result, certain status changes were not reported to the NSLDS within 60 days of the College's determination of the change. Recommendation - We recommend the College review its procedures for verifying that enrollment reports generated for submission to the NSLDS include all status changes. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan - On June 19, 2020, the director of financial aid was doing an internal audit when it was determined that certain student records have not been reported correctly to National Student Clearinghouse (NSC), which consequently were not updated in the NSLDS. As of July 7, 2020, the College was working with the NSC to update and correct winter 2020 enrollment records due to the identified issue. As of July 20, 2020, NSC rebuilt the student records in question and sent the records to NSLDS to be updated. As of August 6, 2020, NSLDS received the updated enrollment records from NSC, and all affected accounts have been updated appropriately. The College has reviewed the processes and steps to create the enrollment records to be sent to NSC. After review, documentation of the enrollment reporting process has been expanded to include the appropriate Colleague screen, NSC Parameter Definition (SITS), and the correct date reference for Census Date/Previous Census Date fields. In addition, the College?s IT department has developed an internal report that will isolate enrollment changes in between reporting periods to verify accuracy of the reports being sent to NSC. This will be implemented immediately, and the internal report and the export report to NSC will be cross referenced for accuracy.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴CFDA Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - Student Financial Assistance Cluster, Department of Education - CFDA No. 84.268, Federal Direct Student Loans and CFDA 84.063, Federal Pell Grant Program Federal Award Identification Number and Year - P268K202849 (2020), P063P192849 (2020) Pass through Entity - N/A Finding Type - Material weakness Repeat Finding - No Criteria - According to 34 CFR Section 685.309 for Direct Loans and Section 690.83 for Pell, changes in a student's status are required to be reported to the National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS) within 30 days of the College's determination of a change or included in a student status confirmation report sent to NSLDS within 60 days of the College's determination of the status change. Condition - Certain student status changes were not reported to the NSLDS within 60 days. Questioned Costs - None Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - Of the 40 student status changes selected for enrollment reporting testing, including 15 graduations and 25 other status changes, status changes were not reported timely for 15 students. The status changes that were not reported timely related to students with status changes other than graduations. Cause and Effect - Several enrollment reports generated for submission to the NSLDS throughout the year did not accurately reflect student status changes occurring throughout the semester. As a result, certain status changes were not reported to the NSLDS within 60 days of the College's determination of the change. Recommendation - We recommend the College review its procedures for verifying that enrollment reports generated for submission to the NSLDS include all status changes. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan - On June 19, 2020, the director of financial aid was doing an internal audit when it was determined that certain student records have not been reported correctly to National Student Clearinghouse (NSC), which consequently were not updated in the NSLDS. As of July 7, 2020, the College was working with the NSC to update and correct winter 2020 enrollment records due to the identified issue. As of July 20, 2020, NSC rebuilt the student records in question and sent the records to NSLDS to be updated. As of August 6, 2020, NSLDS received the updated enrollment records from NSC, and all affected accounts have been updated appropriately. The College has reviewed the processes and steps to create the enrollment records to be sent to NSC. After review, documentation of the enrollment reporting process has been expanded to include the appropriate Colleague screen, NSC Parameter Definition (SITS), and the correct date reference for Census Date/Previous Census Date fields. In addition, the College?s IT department has developed an internal report that will isolate enrollment changes in between reporting periods to verify accuracy of the reports being sent to NSC. This will be implemented immediately, and the internal report and the export report to NSC will be cross referenced for accuracy.
Condition: Certain student status changes were not reported to the NSLDS within 60 days. Planned Corrective Action: On June 19, 2020, the Director of Financial Aid was doing an internal audit when it was determined that certain student records have not been reported correctly to National Student Clearinghouse (NSC), which consequently were not updated in the National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS). As of July 7, 2020, the College was working with the NSC to update and correct Winter 2020 enrollment records due to the identified issue. As of July 20, 2020, NSC rebuilt the student records in question and sent the records to NSLDS to be updated. As of August 6, 2020, NSLDS received the updated enrollment records from NSC and all affected accounts have been updated appropriately. The College has reviewed the processes and steps to create the enrollment records to be sent to NSC. After review, documentation of the enrollment reporting process has been expanded to include the appropriate Colleague screen, NSC Parameter Definition (SITS) and the correct date reference for Census Date/Prev Census Date fields. In addition, the College?s IT department has developed an internal report that will isolate enrollment changes in between reporting periods to verify accuracy of the reports being sent to NSC. This will be implemented immediately and the internal report along with the export report to NSC will be cross referenced for accuracy. Contact person responsible for corrective action: Mathew Catanese, Financial Aid Director Anticipated Completion Date: August 14, 2020
FAC accepted this audit on November 14, 2019 — management decision was due May 14, 2020.
CFDA Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - Student Financial Assistance Cluster - CFDA No. 84.268 Federal Direct Loans and 84.063 Federal Pell Grants Federal Award Identification Number and Year - N/A Pass-through Entity - N/A Finding Type - Significant deficiency Repeat Finding - No Criteria - If a student selected for verification fails to provide required documentation, an institution may not originate or disburse direct subsidized loan proceeds. The student also forfeits the Federal Pell Grant for the award year (34 CFR 668.60). As a result, per the Department of Education's Dear Colleague Letter GEN-04-03 Revised (November 2004), institutions completing a Return of Title IV Aid (R2T4) calculation may not include direct subsidized loans or Pell as "aid that could have been disbursed" for a student subject to verification who has withdrawn without providing all required verification documents. Condition - The College included aid subject to verification in the R2T4 calculation as "aid that could have been disbursed" for a student that did not provide the documents required for verification. Questioned Costs - $1,268 Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - The questioned costs were determined by reperforming the R2T4 calculation using only Title IV aid not subject to verification as "aid that could have been disbursed". Context - Of the 14 students selected for R2T4 testing, the calculation was improper for one student. Cause and Effect - The College performed the student's R2T4 calculation in a timely manner after the date of withdrawal assuming that the student would ultimately complete verification before the required time period expired. However, when the student did not provide the verification documents within the required time period, the College did not have a control in place to revise its calculation and return Title IV funds accordingly based on the revised eligible aid amount. Recommendation - We recommend the College review its R2T4 policies and procedures to ensure that the calculation of "aid that could have been disbursed" is accurate.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴CFDA Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - Student Financial Assistance Cluster - CFDA No. 84.268 Federal Direct Loans and 84.063 Federal Pell Grants Federal Award Identification Number and Year - N/A Pass-through Entity - N/A Finding Type - Significant deficiency Repeat Finding - No Criteria - If a student selected for verification fails to provide required documentation, an institution may not originate or disburse direct subsidized loan proceeds. The student also forfeits the Federal Pell Grant for the award year (34 CFR 668.60). As a result, per the Department of Education's Dear Colleague Letter GEN-04-03 Revised (November 2004), institutions completing a Return of Title IV Aid (R2T4) calculation may not include direct subsidized loans or Pell as "aid that could have been disbursed" for a student subject to verification who has withdrawn without providing all required verification documents. Condition - The College included aid subject to verification in the R2T4 calculation as "aid that could have been disbursed" for a student that did not provide the documents required for verification. Questioned Costs - $1,268 Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - The questioned costs were determined by reperforming the R2T4 calculation using only Title IV aid not subject to verification as "aid that could have been disbursed". Context - Of the 14 students selected for R2T4 testing, the calculation was improper for one student. Cause and Effect - The College performed the student's R2T4 calculation in a timely manner after the date of withdrawal assuming that the student would ultimately complete verification before the required time period expired. However, when the student did not provide the verification documents within the required time period, the College did not have a control in place to revise its calculation and return Title IV funds accordingly based on the revised eligible aid amount. Recommendation - We recommend the College review its R2T4 policies and procedures to ensure that the calculation of "aid that could have been disbursed" is accurate.
The College acknowledges that the calculation was done incorrectly since "aid that could have been disbursed" in the initial calculation was calculated based on the notion the student would complete verification within the 120 days after her last date of attendance. The calculation itself was completed within the time perimeters allowed by R2T4 guidelines. The subsidized loan and Pell Grant amounts incorrectly included in "aid that could have disbursed" were not disbursed to the student due to the verification requirements. The College also reviewed all other students that did not provide required verification documents during the year and noted that no other students withdrew and required an R2T4 calculation. The College has implemented a 3-step review process for all R2T4 calculations. In addition, a cover sheet has been added for all R2T4 calculations to formally document the name of the reviewer and the date for each level of review being performed. The cover sheet includes a verification checkpoint so that this oversight will not occur in the future when calculating "aid that could have been disbursed".
FAC accepted this audit on November 13, 2018 — management decision was due May 13, 2019.
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
2017-001
FAC accepted this audit on November 28, 2017 — management decision was due May 28, 2018.
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
2016-001
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
FAC accepted this audit on December 14, 2016 — management decision was due June 14, 2017.
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Monitor subrecipient audit findings and compliance status.
Start monitoring →© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.