COUNTY OF VERMILIONLocal Government

EIN: 376002224

UEI: VX21JWKQRG41

Audited by: CliftonLarsonAllen LLP

Oversight agency: 21 [Department of the Treasury]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of August 28, 2026

COUNTY OF VERMILION10 audit years5 findings2 repeat
10
Audit Years
5
Total Findings
2
Repeat Findings

FY 2023-11-30

$5,552,862 federal awards expended

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on August 26, 2024. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by February 26, 2025 (548 days ago).

What is a management decision? →
2023-002
Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEATOTHER MATTERS

Several purchases for Federal awards did not complete the suspension and debarment procedures prior to entering into the transactions. Questioned costs: None Context: In the testing of 4 of 8 of the suspension and debarment transactions has not been completely followed per the Uniform Grant Guidance. Cause: The processes for suspension and were not properly followed during the current fiscal year. Effect: A lack of internal control procedures can lead to noncompliance with grant requirements. Repeat finding: 2022-002 Recommendation: We recommend following the requirements for suspension and debarment per the Uniform Guidance, including the date performed and retain required documentation. Views of responsible officials: The County recognizes and accepts the audit finding as presented.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Federal agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Federal program title: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Award Period: March 3, 2021 – December 31, 2026 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance, Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Nonfederal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220). Condition: Several purchases for Federal awards did not complete the suspension and debarment procedures prior to entering into the transactions. Questioned costs: None Context: In the testing of 4 of 8 of the suspension and debarment transactions has not been completely followed per the Uniform Grant Guidance. Cause: The processes for suspension and were not properly followed during the current fiscal year. Effect: A lack of internal control procedures can lead to noncompliance with grant requirements. Repeat finding: 2022-002 Recommendation: We recommend following the requirements for suspension and debarment per the Uniform Guidance, including the date performed and retain required documentation. Views of responsible officials: The County recognizes and accepts the audit finding as presented.

Corrective Action Plan

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY Suspension and Debarment Recommendation: We recommend following the requirements for suspension and debarment per the Uniform Guidance, including the date performed and retain required documentation. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: The County will continue to place procedures in place which ensure the policies are followed. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Larry Baugh, Board Chairman Planned completion date for corrective action plan: November 30, 2024

Prior Finding References

2022-002

About Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →

FY 2022-11-30

$4,773,314 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on September 5, 2023 — management decision was due March 5, 2024.

2022-002
Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT

The County did not complete the suspension and debarment procedures prior to entering into the transactions. Questioned costs: None Context: The County?s suspension and debarment policy has not been completely followed per the Uniform Grant Guidance. This was noted in the 5 out of 5 items tested. Cause: The processes for suspension and debarment where updated and approved near the end of the current fiscal year as a result of the prior year finding. However, the updated procedures were not implemented for the full year which resulted in the majority of the current year?s transactions following the old procedures. Effect: A lack of internal control procedures can lead to noncompliance with grant requirements. Repeat finding: The finding is a repeat of the finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2021-002. Recommendation: We recommend following the requirements for suspension and debarment per the Uniform Guidance, including the date performed and retain required documentation.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Criteria or specific requirement: Nonfederal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. ?Covered transactions? include contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220). Condition: The County did not complete the suspension and debarment procedures prior to entering into the transactions. Questioned costs: None Context: The County?s suspension and debarment policy has not been completely followed per the Uniform Grant Guidance. This was noted in the 5 out of 5 items tested. Cause: The processes for suspension and debarment where updated and approved near the end of the current fiscal year as a result of the prior year finding. However, the updated procedures were not implemented for the full year which resulted in the majority of the current year?s transactions following the old procedures. Effect: A lack of internal control procedures can lead to noncompliance with grant requirements. Repeat finding: The finding is a repeat of the finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2021-002. Recommendation: We recommend following the requirements for suspension and debarment per the Uniform Guidance, including the date performed and retain required documentation.

Corrective Action Plan

2022-002 Suspension and Debarment Procedures Not Completed Recommendation: We recommend following the requirements for suspension and debarment per the Uniform Guidance, including the date performed and retain required documentation. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: The County has updated the process for their procurement policy to ensure compliance with Unifor Grant Guidance. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Larry Baughn, Board Chairman Planned completion date for corrective action plan: November 30, 2022

Prior Finding References

2021-002

About Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →
2022-003
Other
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYQUESTIONED COSTS

The County made errors in its support summarizing/reconciling its allowable costs, when reporting the funds it spent under COVID-19 State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds, overclaiming $7,125 cumulatively during the fiscal year. In addition, there is no formal documentation of the review being completed. Questioned costs: $7,125 Context: The County made errors on the amounts reported in 4 out of 4 reports tested, cumulatively overclaiming $7,125 during the fiscal year. Cause: Costs were paid accurately to employees and vendors, but, incorrectly allocated and charged to the grant due to adjustments/allocations made in subsequent periods. Effect: May result in unallowable costs being charged to Federal programs. Repeat finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the County review its procedures relative to allocating costs and reviewing support provided for reporting to Federal programs.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Criteria or specific requirement: Uniform Grant Guidance (2 CFR 200.303) requires nonfederal entities receiving Federal awards establish and maintain internal controls designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal laws, regulations, and program compliance requirements. Effective internal controls should include ensuring that supporting calculations are accurate. Condition: The County made errors in its support summarizing/reconciling its allowable costs, when reporting the funds it spent under COVID-19 State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds, overclaiming $7,125 cumulatively during the fiscal year. In addition, there is no formal documentation of the review being completed. Questioned costs: $7,125 Context: The County made errors on the amounts reported in 4 out of 4 reports tested, cumulatively overclaiming $7,125 during the fiscal year. Cause: Costs were paid accurately to employees and vendors, but, incorrectly allocated and charged to the grant due to adjustments/allocations made in subsequent periods. Effect: May result in unallowable costs being charged to Federal programs. Repeat finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the County review its procedures relative to allocating costs and reviewing support provided for reporting to Federal programs.

Corrective Action Plan

2022-003 Errors in Support Summarizing/Reconciling Allowable Costs in Reporting and No Formal Documentation of Review of Reports Recommendation: We recommend the County review its procedures relative to allocating costs and reviewing support provided for reporting to Federal programs Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: The County will keep reporting records for detailed documentation of expenses, along with quarterly filing reports to ensure balancing of all Federal Reporting to New World Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Larry Baughn, Board Chairman Planned completion date for corrective action plan: Quarterly Reporting ending March 31, 2023.

About Other →

FY 2021-11-30

$1,478,272 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on August 9, 2022 — management decision was due February 9, 2023.

2021-002
Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

The County did not provide supporting documentation to detail the history of the procurement as required by Uniform Grant Guidance. In discussion with the client and with the supporting documentation that was provided, there was evidence that the procurement process did occur, however the documentation was not maintained or adequately documented. Questioned costs: None. Context: The County?s procurement policy has not been completely updated to Uniform Grant Guidance for documentation to retain. Cause: The procurement policy should have written policies and procedures to be in compliance with Uniform Grant Guidance. Effect: A lack of internal control procedures can lead to noncompliance with grant requirements. Repeat Finding: None. Recommendation: We recommend updating the procurement policy per the Uniform Guidance and retain required documentation. Views of responsible officials: The County recognizes and accepts the audit finding as presented.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

FINDING 2021 ? 002 Federal agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Federal program title: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Award Period: March 3, 2021 ? December 31, 2026 Type of Finding: ? Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria or specific requirement: The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Condition: The County did not provide supporting documentation to detail the history of the procurement as required by Uniform Grant Guidance. In discussion with the client and with the supporting documentation that was provided, there was evidence that the procurement process did occur, however the documentation was not maintained or adequately documented. Questioned costs: None. Context: The County?s procurement policy has not been completely updated to Uniform Grant Guidance for documentation to retain. Cause: The procurement policy should have written policies and procedures to be in compliance with Uniform Grant Guidance. Effect: A lack of internal control procedures can lead to noncompliance with grant requirements. Repeat Finding: None. Recommendation: We recommend updating the procurement policy per the Uniform Guidance and retain required documentation. Views of responsible officials: The County recognizes and accepts the audit finding as presented.

Corrective Action Plan

FINDINGS?FEDERAL AWARD PROGRAMS AUDITS U.S. Department of Treasury 2021-002 Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance (ALN #21.027) Recommendation: We recommend updating the procurement policy per the Uniform Guidance and retain required documentation. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: The County is in the process of updating their procurement policy to ensure compliance with Uniform Grant Guidance. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Larry Baughn, Board Chairman Planned completion date for corrective action plan: November 30, 2022

About Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →

FY 2018-11-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,669,236 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on February 6, 2020 — management decision was due August 6, 2020.

2018-004
Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Special Tests and Provisions →

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.