CITY OF CHICAGO

EIN: 366005820

UEI: NDHBBJ4B1LN5

Data as of August 26, 2026

CITY OF CHICAGO10 audit years31 findings4 repeat
10
Audit Years
31
Total Findings
4
Repeat Findings

FY 2025-12-31

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on July 24, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by January 24, 2027 (150 days from today).

What is a management decision? →
2025-002
Reporting

FINDING 2025-002 Assistance Listing Number 93.600 Head Start Federal Agency U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Pass-through Agency Not applicable Award Numbers / Years 05CH012050, 2025 05HP000439, 2025 05HP000514, 2024 City Department Chicago Department of Family and Support Services (DFSS) Criteria: Under the requirements of the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) (Pub L. No. 109-282), hereafter referred as the "Transparency Act" that are codified in 2 CFR Parts 25 and 170, recipients (i.e., direct recipients) of grants or cooperative agreements are required to report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more to the System for Award Management (SAM.gov). The subaward data reported must accurately represent the key data elements supported by the source documentation. These key data elements include the following: Subawardee Name, Subawardee UEI#, Amount of Subaward, Subaward Obligation/Action Date, Date of Report Submission, Subaward Number, Subaward Project Description, Subaward Names and Compensation of Highly Compensated Officers if thresholds are met. Reporting submission must be no later than the last day of the month following the month in which the subaward/subaward amendment obligation was made or the subcontract award/subcontract modification was made. Condition/Context: Out of 30 subawards selected, nine subawards were found to be submitted beyond the due date. In addition, the subawardee’s UEI was not included in the data reported. Our sample was not statistically valid. See below for the errors noted: Assistance Listing Number 93.600 Transactions tested / Dollar amount 9 transactions $15,529,562 Subawards not reported / Dollar amount N/A Reports not timely / Dollar amount 9 reports $15,529,562 Subawards amount incorrect/ Dollar amount N/A Subawards missing key elements / Dollar amount 9 subawards $15,529,562 Effect: DFSS is not in compliance with the reporting guidelines required by FFATA for the Head Start program. Questioned Costs: None noted. Cause: DFSS did not have a process in place to ensure FFATA reporting was done timely during times of department turnover and transition. Recommendation: We recommend the Chicago Department of Family and Support Services (DFSS) ensure that reporting under FFATA is completed for all relevant subawards by the required due date with the correct key data elements maintained in each subaward and is reviewed for accuracy and completeness compared to the subawards' source documentation. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

FINDING 2025-002 Assistance Listing Number 93.600 Head Start Federal Agency U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Pass-through Agency Not applicable Award Numbers / Years 05CH012050, 2025 05HP000439, 2025 05HP000514, 2024 City Department Chicago Department of Family and Support Services (DFSS) Criteria: Under the requirements of the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) (Pub L. No. 109-282), hereafter referred as the "Transparency Act" that are codified in 2 CFR Parts 25 and 170, recipients (i.e., direct recipients) of grants or cooperative agreements are required to report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more to the System for Award Management (SAM.gov). The subaward data reported must accurately represent the key data elements supported by the source documentation. These key data elements include the following: Subawardee Name, Subawardee UEI#, Amount of Subaward, Subaward Obligation/Action Date, Date of Report Submission, Subaward Number, Subaward Project Description, Subaward Names and Compensation of Highly Compensated Officers if thresholds are met. Reporting submission must be no later than the last day of the month following the month in which the subaward/subaward amendment obligation was made or the subcontract award/subcontract modification was made. Condition/Context: Out of 30 subawards selected, nine subawards were found to be submitted beyond the due date. In addition, the subawardee’s UEI was not included in the data reported. Our sample was not statistically valid. See below for the errors noted: Assistance Listing Number 93.600 Transactions tested / Dollar amount 9 transactions $15,529,562 Subawards not reported / Dollar amount N/A Reports not timely / Dollar amount 9 reports $15,529,562 Subawards amount incorrect/ Dollar amount N/A Subawards missing key elements / Dollar amount 9 subawards $15,529,562 Effect: DFSS is not in compliance with the reporting guidelines required by FFATA for the Head Start program. Questioned Costs: None noted. Cause: DFSS did not have a process in place to ensure FFATA reporting was done timely during times of department turnover and transition. Recommendation: We recommend the Chicago Department of Family and Support Services (DFSS) ensure that reporting under FFATA is completed for all relevant subawards by the required due date with the correct key data elements maintained in each subaward and is reviewed for accuracy and completeness compared to the subawards' source documentation. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan.

Corrective Action Plan

FINDING 2025-002 This is Department of Family and Support Services’ first Single Audit where FFATA reporting was reviewed under Sam.gov rather than FSRS.gov. The Sam.gov system does not keep records of historical changes/ updates to published reports. Every time a report is modified, the date of submission is updated to reflect the current date. Effective August 1, 2026, DFSS will track and document changes or updates made to a FFATA report by using screenshots. Additionally, DFSS will update FFATA reports when the original contract and budget allocation is modified. DFSS will submit separate FFATA reports for each program funded by contract number. The FFATA reports will be delineated in Sam.gov by the purchase order number and the release number using the new Subaward ID format “PO#_Release#.” Chief Research Analyst Kaur from DFSS’ Grants unit will be responsible for ensuring the changes are implemented for FFATA reporting. Deputy Commissioner of Contracts, IT, and Programmatic Monitoring Givens will be responsible for providing oversight and monitoring the process with the Department of Family and Support Services (DFSS) Contracts staff to add the sub awardee’s UEI to the contract for all future amendments and new contracts is implemented by August 1, 2026.

About Reporting →

FY 2024-12-31

FAC accepted this audit on July 28, 2025 — management decision was due January 28, 2026.

2024-002
Special Tests & Provisions
MATERIAL WEAKNESS

FINDING 2024-002 Assistance Listing Number 14.241 Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS Federal Agency U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Pass-through Agency Not applicable Award Numbers / Years Not applicable City Department Chicago Department of Public Health (CDPH) Criteria: All housing that involves acquisition, rehabilitation, conversion, lease, repair of facilities, new construction, project-or tenant-based rental assistance (including assistance for shared housing arrangements), and operating costs must meet various housing quality standards listed in 24 CFR sections 574.310(b)(1)-(2). Condition/Context: CDPH was unable to provide a full listing of housing units requiring inspections that receive HOPWA funding. Consequently, we were not able to complete testing in relation to this requirement. It was noted that a review conducted by HUD identified a similar issue where CDPH was in process of updating policies and procedures that would allow for identification of the housing units that require inspections. Effect: CDPH cannot demonstrate that it is compliant with the housing quality standards applicable to program-assisted units. Questioned Costs: Not able to be determined. Cause: CDPH did not have a process in place in 2024 to identify all housing units that require inspections. Recommendation: In response to the HUD review, CDPH developed a corrective action plan to begin compiling a comprehensive list of all projects requiring inspections. Documentation is to be provided to HUD that includes appropriate support for completion of the required inspections. This process is expected to begin taking place in the summer of 2025. We recommend that CDPH follow through with this corrective action to address this finding. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

FINDING 2024-002 Assistance Listing Number 14.241 Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS Federal Agency U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Pass-through Agency Not applicable Award Numbers / Years Not applicable City Department Chicago Department of Public Health (CDPH) Criteria: All housing that involves acquisition, rehabilitation, conversion, lease, repair of facilities, new construction, project-or tenant-based rental assistance (including assistance for shared housing arrangements), and operating costs must meet various housing quality standards listed in 24 CFR sections 574.310(b)(1)-(2). Condition/Context: CDPH was unable to provide a full listing of housing units requiring inspections that receive HOPWA funding. Consequently, we were not able to complete testing in relation to this requirement. It was noted that a review conducted by HUD identified a similar issue where CDPH was in process of updating policies and procedures that would allow for identification of the housing units that require inspections. Effect: CDPH cannot demonstrate that it is compliant with the housing quality standards applicable to program-assisted units. Questioned Costs: Not able to be determined. Cause: CDPH did not have a process in place in 2024 to identify all housing units that require inspections. Recommendation: In response to the HUD review, CDPH developed a corrective action plan to begin compiling a comprehensive list of all projects requiring inspections. Documentation is to be provided to HUD that includes appropriate support for completion of the required inspections. This process is expected to begin taking place in the summer of 2025. We recommend that CDPH follow through with this corrective action to address this finding. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan.

Corrective Action Plan

The Chicago Department of Public Housing (CDPH) will continue working through its corrective action plan (CAP) for U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) which involves completing an assessment of all client-files for individuals receiving HOPWA services in the Chicago Eligible Metropolitan Statistical Area. CDPH staff developed the Client-file assessment tool in collaboration with HUD, and all HOPWA Project Sponsors in the Eligible Metropolitan Statistical Area have submitted, through Secure File Transfer, client files for every single individual receiving HOPWA services through their organization. CDPH staff are currently conducting a comprehensive assessment of the completeness of these files including documentation of the inspection of units resided in by individuals and households. This assessment is being conducted through REDCap secure survey to capture the assessment results for every single individual receiving HOPWA services. CDPH anticipates completion of this assessment by August 31, 2025. The results of the assessment will be submitted to HUD as a formal completion of the HUD-issued Corrective Action Plan. Following this submission, CDPH will engage with HUD in designing ongoing monitoring of HOPWA Project Sponsors in the jurisdiction. Director of Program Operations Stonehouse at the Chicago Department of Public Health for the Community Health Services Division of the Syndemic Infectious Disease Bureau will be responsible for overseeing the completion of the client file assessment, analysis of the results of the assessment and communication of these results with the HUD HOPWA Project Officer and HOPWA Project Sponsors, and working with HUD and other interest holders to design and implement ongoing monitoring standards.

About Special Tests and Provisions →
2024-003
Special Tests & Provisions

FINDING 2024-003 Assistance Listing Number 14.231 Emergency Solutions Grants Program Federal Agency U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Pass-through Agency Not applicable Award Numbers / Years E-22-MC-17-0006, 2022 / E-24-MC-17-0006, 2024 City Departments Department of Family and Support Services (DFSS) Department of Finance (DOF) Criteria: The program regulations for the Emergency Solutions Grants Program include requirements related to the timing of expenditures as well as payments to subrecipients. Specifically, all of the grant must be expended for eligible activity costs within 24 months after the date HUD signs the grant agreement with the City. In addition, the City must pay each subrecipient for allowable costs within 30 days after receiving the subrecipient's complete payment request. Condition/Context: There was one award (E-22-MC-17-0006) where the period of performance ended in the audit year and was subject to the 24-month expenditure requirement. This award was underspent by $281,760 upon reaching 24 months after the award was executed by HUD. We also tested 40 individual payments made to subrecipients. 13 of those payments were paid after the 30-day subrecipient payment requirement. Our samples were not statistically valid. Effect: The City is not meeting target expenditure and payment requirements in accordance with the program agreements. Questioned Costs: None noted. Cause: DFSS did not expend the full amount of the identified award within the required timeframe because it was prioritizing the spending of a related CARES award during the same timeframe. The City's Voucher Audit and Tracking Unit (VATS) within the Department of Finance is responsible for making payments to subrecipients. At times, VATS will experience a significant increase in voucher submissions and is operating with limited staffing, which has caused some delays in processing payments. Recommendation: We recommend that DFSS determine if the budgeting and monitoring process can identify instances where spending does not occur within the required timeframes for current grants to help increase compliance in subsequent years. We also recommend that VATS review its processing procedures to determine if priority can be given to vouchers from programs with specific payment requirements. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

FINDING 2024-003 Assistance Listing Number 14.231 Emergency Solutions Grants Program Federal Agency U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Pass-through Agency Not applicable Award Numbers / Years E-22-MC-17-0006, 2022 / E-24-MC-17-0006, 2024 City Departments Department of Family and Support Services (DFSS) Department of Finance (DOF) Criteria: The program regulations for the Emergency Solutions Grants Program include requirements related to the timing of expenditures as well as payments to subrecipients. Specifically, all of the grant must be expended for eligible activity costs within 24 months after the date HUD signs the grant agreement with the City. In addition, the City must pay each subrecipient for allowable costs within 30 days after receiving the subrecipient's complete payment request. Condition/Context: There was one award (E-22-MC-17-0006) where the period of performance ended in the audit year and was subject to the 24-month expenditure requirement. This award was underspent by $281,760 upon reaching 24 months after the award was executed by HUD. We also tested 40 individual payments made to subrecipients. 13 of those payments were paid after the 30-day subrecipient payment requirement. Our samples were not statistically valid. Effect: The City is not meeting target expenditure and payment requirements in accordance with the program agreements. Questioned Costs: None noted. Cause: DFSS did not expend the full amount of the identified award within the required timeframe because it was prioritizing the spending of a related CARES award during the same timeframe. The City's Voucher Audit and Tracking Unit (VATS) within the Department of Finance is responsible for making payments to subrecipients. At times, VATS will experience a significant increase in voucher submissions and is operating with limited staffing, which has caused some delays in processing payments. Recommendation: We recommend that DFSS determine if the budgeting and monitoring process can identify instances where spending does not occur within the required timeframes for current grants to help increase compliance in subsequent years. We also recommend that VATS review its processing procedures to determine if priority can be given to vouchers from programs with specific payment requirements. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan.

Corrective Action Plan

The Department of Family and Support Services (DFSS) will review its budget and monitoring process for the Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG) Program to ensure grant funds are prioritized for spending in accordance with the program requirements. Monthly expenditure reports will be reviewed by the Director of Homeless Prevention Policy & Planning to assess spending progress and to follow up on any delays in vouchering by subrecipients. Specifically: 1. The Director will review monthly expenditure reports provided by the Department of Family and Support Services (DFSS) Finance team by the 10th of each month for all ESG grant awards. 2. The Homeless Services Division will send notices to agencies with expenditures below contracted expenditure expectations on ESG awards on at least a quarterly basis. The notice will include the current expenditure rate, a reminder on expectations to voucher on a monthly basis within 15 calendar days of the end of the month, and a request for the agency’s plan to improve expenditure rates in line with contract expectations, which are as follows: a. First quarter 25% b. Second quarter 50% c. Third quarter 75% d. Fourth quarter 100% 3. Any unspent ESG funds in the first 12 months of the grant will be reallocated in the second 12 months of the grant to maximize expenditures. Director of Homeless Prevention Policy & Planning Howard at the Department of Family and Support Services will be responsible for ensuring the implementation of this corrective action plan by December 31, 2025. The Voucher Audit and Tracking Unit (VATS) within the Department of Finance, Grant and Project Accounting Division will closely monitor the daily report of accumulated subrecipient (delegate agency) vouchers and prioritize aged vouchers. The goal is to issue payment for aged subrecipient vouchers within 15 calendar days. If the supporting documentation for the vouchers is incomplete or requires additional follow-up information, VATS will hold the vouchers for 2 business days pending the additional supporting documentation/information from the delegate agency. If the supporting documentation is not received within 2 business days, then VATS will reject the vouchers and provide an explanation for the rejection. The delegate agency will be allowed to re-submit the voucher(s) with the required supporting documentation. Chief Voucher Expediters Mendez and Vargas at the Department of Finance, Grant and Project Accounting Division, Voucher Audit and Tracking Systems (VATS) Unit will be responsible for ensuring timely payments to subrecipients and for the implementation of this corrective action plan by July 31, 2025.

About Special Tests and Provisions →
2024-004
Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking

FINDING 2024-004 Assistance Listing Number 14.231 Emergency Solutions Grants Program Federal Agency U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Pass-through Agency Not applicable Award Numbers / Years E-22-MC-17-0006, 2022 / E-23-MC-17-0006, 2023 City Department Department of Family and Support Services (DFSS) Criteria: According to program requirements, recipients of Emergency Solutions Grant Program funding must match the funding provided by HUD with an equal amount from sources other than those provided under the program. In addition, a recipient cannot use program funds to replace funds the City provided for street outreach and emergency shelter services during the preceding 12-month period. Condition/Context: We reviewed the process used by DFSS to monitor the matching requirement for two of the four active awards. According to the initial documentation received, it appeared that one award was under matched and one award was over matched. DFSS made corrections to the calculations based on the issues noted during our audit to both awards. The level of effort requirements were dependent on these same calculations and were revised along with the matching calculations. Our samples were not statistically valid. Effect: The City may not meet the various financial requirements contained in the awards' terms and conditions without appropriate oversight. Questioned Costs: None noted. Cause: DFSS did not have a definitive process in place to identify, calculate, and monitor the matching and level of effort requirements. Recommendation: We recommend DFSS review its policies and procedures regarding the matching and level of effort requirements to ensure they are accurately performed and monitored by appropriate financial personnel. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

FINDING 2024-004 Assistance Listing Number 14.231 Emergency Solutions Grants Program Federal Agency U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Pass-through Agency Not applicable Award Numbers / Years E-22-MC-17-0006, 2022 / E-23-MC-17-0006, 2023 City Department Department of Family and Support Services (DFSS) Criteria: According to program requirements, recipients of Emergency Solutions Grant Program funding must match the funding provided by HUD with an equal amount from sources other than those provided under the program. In addition, a recipient cannot use program funds to replace funds the City provided for street outreach and emergency shelter services during the preceding 12-month period. Condition/Context: We reviewed the process used by DFSS to monitor the matching requirement for two of the four active awards. According to the initial documentation received, it appeared that one award was under matched and one award was over matched. DFSS made corrections to the calculations based on the issues noted during our audit to both awards. The level of effort requirements were dependent on these same calculations and were revised along with the matching calculations. Our samples were not statistically valid. Effect: The City may not meet the various financial requirements contained in the awards' terms and conditions without appropriate oversight. Questioned Costs: None noted. Cause: DFSS did not have a definitive process in place to identify, calculate, and monitor the matching and level of effort requirements. Recommendation: We recommend DFSS review its policies and procedures regarding the matching and level of effort requirements to ensure they are accurately performed and monitored by appropriate financial personnel. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan.

Corrective Action Plan

The Department of Family and Support Services (DFSS) will document its annual process regarding the calculation of Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG) matching and level of effort requirements to ensure it is accurately performed and reviewed by the appropriate DFSS Finance management personnel, Supervisor of Accounting and Director of Finance. The completed match will be sent for final review to DFSS’ Deputy Commissioner of Finance for confirmation and required financial grant reporting. Deputy Commissioner of Finance Ciezczak at the Department of Family and Support Services will be responsible for providing oversight and monitoring this process. The defined process will be documented and implemented by December 31, 2025.

About Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking →
2024-005
Special Tests & Provisions

FINDING 2024-005 Assistance Listing Number 14.239 Home Investment Partnerships Program Federal Agency U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Pass-through Agency Not applicable Award Numbers / Years Not applicable City Department Department of Housing (DOH) Criteria: Participating jurisdictions must perform on-site inspections of rental housing occupied by tenants receiving HOME/HOME-ARP-assisted tenant-based rental assistance to determine compliance with housing quality standards per 24 CFR sections 92.209(i), 92.251(f), and 92.504 (d)). Condition/Context: One rental housing project had no evidence it was reinspected after failing the initital required inspection. A sample was taken of 14 projects receiving HOME-assisted funding. Supporting documentation was viewed for the most recent inspection of each project in the sample to ensure the inspection was completed within the required timeframe. It was noted that for a project that failed an inspection, a follow-up inspection was not completed. Our sample was not statistically valid. Effect: There is a higher likelihood that housing funded by the HOME program is not considered to be compliant with property standards. Questioned Costs: None noted. Cause: DOH did not have a process in place to ensure the reinspection was done timely. Recommendation: We recommend that the Chicago Department of Housing ensure that reinspections are flagged and completed in a timely manner in situations when the initial inspection failed. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

FINDING 2024-005 Assistance Listing Number 14.239 Home Investment Partnerships Program Federal Agency U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Pass-through Agency Not applicable Award Numbers / Years Not applicable City Department Department of Housing (DOH) Criteria: Participating jurisdictions must perform on-site inspections of rental housing occupied by tenants receiving HOME/HOME-ARP-assisted tenant-based rental assistance to determine compliance with housing quality standards per 24 CFR sections 92.209(i), 92.251(f), and 92.504 (d)). Condition/Context: One rental housing project had no evidence it was reinspected after failing the initital required inspection. A sample was taken of 14 projects receiving HOME-assisted funding. Supporting documentation was viewed for the most recent inspection of each project in the sample to ensure the inspection was completed within the required timeframe. It was noted that for a project that failed an inspection, a follow-up inspection was not completed. Our sample was not statistically valid. Effect: There is a higher likelihood that housing funded by the HOME program is not considered to be compliant with property standards. Questioned Costs: None noted. Cause: DOH did not have a process in place to ensure the reinspection was done timely. Recommendation: We recommend that the Chicago Department of Housing ensure that reinspections are flagged and completed in a timely manner in situations when the initial inspection failed. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan.

Corrective Action Plan

The finding was a result of a 2022 original inspection that occurred for one rental property. The property was placed in temporary non-compliance status as a follow-up inspection was scheduled. The property did not correct all the non-compliant issues, and it did not receive a final non-compliant determination letter. The non-issuance of the final non-compliant letter was a mistake made by a Rehabilitation Construction Specialist (RCS) staff person. The RCS staff person should have followed up with the non-compliant determination letter within 12 months of the original inspection as described in Department of Housing’s policies and procedures. The property was inspected in June per the tri-annual inspection schedule and was issued a non-compliant letter. This oversight was a mistake made by the Rehabilitation Construction Specialist by not following up with the final non-compliant determination letter, which did not comply with the normal practice of Department of Housing’s policies and procedures. Deputy Commissioner of DOH’s Construction and Compliance (CAC) Division, Smith, will ensure all managers within CAC properly train their RCS staff on current policies and procedures. The managers’ specific tasks will include: 1. Review all temporary non-compliant and non-compliant projects with the RCS staff on a monthly basis to ensure follow-up notices are sent and reinspection(s) are scheduled within the timeframe given for that particular violation. 2. Track correspondences to owners and property managers informing them of reinspection dates and time for all non-compliant projects. 3. Collect final compliance determination for all non-compliant projects within the 12-month period. Deputy Commissioner Smith at Department of Housing’s Construction and Compliance Division will be responsible for ensuring the corrective action plan is implemented by December 31, 2025.

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2023-12-31

FAC accepted this audit on July 31, 2024 — management decision was due January 31, 2025.

2023-002
Reporting

FINDING 2023-002 Assistance Listing Numbers 93.268 COVID-19 Immunization Cooperative Agreements 93.323 COVID-19 Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases (ELC) 93.354 COVID-19 Public Health Emergency Response: Cooperative Agreement for Emergency Response: Public Health Crisis Response 93.686 Ending the HIV Epidemic: A Plan for America – Ryan White HIV/AIDS Program Parts A and B Federal Agency U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Pass-through Agency Not applicable Award Numbers / Years 93.268: NH23IP922613 93.323: NU50CK000556 93.354: NU90TP922158 93.686: UT8H33950-01 City Department Department of Public Health (CDPH) Criteria: Under the requirements of the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) (Pub L. No. 109-282), as amended by Section 6202 of Pub. L. No. 110-252, hereafter referred as the "Transparency Act" that are codified in 2 CFR Part 170, recipients (i.e., direct recipients) of grants or cooperative agreements are required to report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more to the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act Subaward Reporting System (FSRS) and report subaward data through FSRS. The subaward data reported must accurately represent the key data elements supported by the source documentation. These key data elements include the following: Subawardee Name, Subawardee DUNS#, Amount of Subaward, Subaward Obligation /Action Date, Date of Report Submission, Subaward Number, Subaward Project Description, Subaward Names and Compensation of Highly Compensated Officers if thresholds are met. Reporting submission must be no later than the last day of the month following the month in which the subaward/subaward amendment obligation was made or the subcontract award/subcontract modification was made. Condition/Context: Subawards sampled across the programs noted above were found to be submitted beyond the due date, not reported at all, reported using the wrong amount, or reported with an incorrect subawardee name. Sample sizes and errors found during testing are noted below. Our sample was not statistically valid. Effect: CDPH is not in compliance with the reporting guidelines required by FFATA. Questioned Costs: Not applicable. Cause: CDPH did not have a process in place to ensure FFATA reporting was done timely and accurately. Recommendation: We recommend the Chicago Department of Public Health (CDPH) ensure that reporting under FFATA is completed for all relevant subawards by the required due date with the correct key data elements for each subaward and is reviewed for accuracy and completeness compared to the subawards' source documentation. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

FINDING 2023-002 Assistance Listing Numbers 93.268 COVID-19 Immunization Cooperative Agreements 93.323 COVID-19 Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases (ELC) 93.354 COVID-19 Public Health Emergency Response: Cooperative Agreement for Emergency Response: Public Health Crisis Response 93.686 Ending the HIV Epidemic: A Plan for America – Ryan White HIV/AIDS Program Parts A and B Federal Agency U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Pass-through Agency Not applicable Award Numbers / Years 93.268: NH23IP922613 93.323: NU50CK000556 93.354: NU90TP922158 93.686: UT8H33950-01 City Department Department of Public Health (CDPH) Criteria: Under the requirements of the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) (Pub L. No. 109-282), as amended by Section 6202 of Pub. L. No. 110-252, hereafter referred as the "Transparency Act" that are codified in 2 CFR Part 170, recipients (i.e., direct recipients) of grants or cooperative agreements are required to report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more to the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act Subaward Reporting System (FSRS) and report subaward data through FSRS. The subaward data reported must accurately represent the key data elements supported by the source documentation. These key data elements include the following: Subawardee Name, Subawardee DUNS#, Amount of Subaward, Subaward Obligation /Action Date, Date of Report Submission, Subaward Number, Subaward Project Description, Subaward Names and Compensation of Highly Compensated Officers if thresholds are met. Reporting submission must be no later than the last day of the month following the month in which the subaward/subaward amendment obligation was made or the subcontract award/subcontract modification was made. Condition/Context: Subawards sampled across the programs noted above were found to be submitted beyond the due date, not reported at all, reported using the wrong amount, or reported with an incorrect subawardee name. Sample sizes and errors found during testing are noted below. Our sample was not statistically valid. Effect: CDPH is not in compliance with the reporting guidelines required by FFATA. Questioned Costs: Not applicable. Cause: CDPH did not have a process in place to ensure FFATA reporting was done timely and accurately. Recommendation: We recommend the Chicago Department of Public Health (CDPH) ensure that reporting under FFATA is completed for all relevant subawards by the required due date with the correct key data elements for each subaward and is reviewed for accuracy and completeness compared to the subawards' source documentation. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan.

Corrective Action Plan

Effective September 1, 2024, the FFATA Reporting Coordinator (a designated Contract Review Specialist at Chicago Department of Public Health) will enter and submit the required contract data into the FFATA system within 30 days of the contract's execution date. The FFATA Reporting Coordinator will save the report in PDF and a screenshot of the submission date. At the end of each month, the FFATA Reporting Coordinator will meet with the Contract Administrator on the 3rd Wednesday of each month. They will complete the FFATA reporting worksheet to confirm that each requirement was reported and submitted correctly. The FFATA reporting worksheet will include all required data points provided by the auditors. The FFATA Reporting Coordinator, Contract Administrator, and Assistant Commissioner will have a standing meeting on the 4th Monday of every month to review the FFATA reports and FFATA worksheets and confirm that every executed contract was properly entered into the FFATA system for that month. Assistant Commissioner Pfeiffer at the Department of Public Health will be responsible for ensuring that this corrective action plan is implemented by September 1, 2024.

About Reporting →
2023-003
Reporting

FINDING 2023-003 Assistance Listing Number 21.023 COVID-19 Emergency Rental Assistance Program Federal Agency U.S. Department of Treasury Pass-through Agency Not applicable Award Numbers / Years ERA2 City Department Department of Housing (DOH) Criteria: Under the requirements of 2CFR 200.329, the non-Federal entity must submit performance reports at the interval required by the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity to best inform improvements in program outcomes and productivity. The U.S. Treasury requires program performance reports to be filed quarterly. Condition/Context: Two out of the four quarterly ERA Compliance reports were sampled. It was noted that DOH did not file the second quarter report on a timely basis. The portal did not allow a report to be filed after the due date. The sample was not statistically valid. Effect: DOH was not in compliance with the reporting guidelines for the program. Questioned Costs: Not applicable. Cause: DOH did not have a process put in place to ensure that each required quarterly performance report was filed by the deadline. Recommendation: We recommend that DOH review its reporting process to ensure that reports are filed in a timely basis. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

FINDING 2023-003 Assistance Listing Number 21.023 COVID-19 Emergency Rental Assistance Program Federal Agency U.S. Department of Treasury Pass-through Agency Not applicable Award Numbers / Years ERA2 City Department Department of Housing (DOH) Criteria: Under the requirements of 2CFR 200.329, the non-Federal entity must submit performance reports at the interval required by the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity to best inform improvements in program outcomes and productivity. The U.S. Treasury requires program performance reports to be filed quarterly. Condition/Context: Two out of the four quarterly ERA Compliance reports were sampled. It was noted that DOH did not file the second quarter report on a timely basis. The portal did not allow a report to be filed after the due date. The sample was not statistically valid. Effect: DOH was not in compliance with the reporting guidelines for the program. Questioned Costs: Not applicable. Cause: DOH did not have a process put in place to ensure that each required quarterly performance report was filed by the deadline. Recommendation: We recommend that DOH review its reporting process to ensure that reports are filed in a timely basis. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan.

Corrective Action Plan

As a result of the 2023 Single Audit, the Department of Housing (DOH) received an audit finding related to a missing quarterly report that was not filed for the Emergency Rental Assistance (ERA) Program. Currently, Treasury reporting for ERA is conducted primarily by the Director of Policy, and the Treasury reporting system is not integrated into other DOH grant systems to provide a wider view to DOH contracts and finance staff as to the status of report submissions. As a corrective action, DOH will establish an internal process requiring that quarterly reports, including a time stamp of submission, be saved and circulated to DOH contracts staff by the 15th of the month following the end of each quarter. Acting Director of Policy Stern at Department of Housing will be responsible for ensuring that this corrective action plan is implemented by January 1, 2025.

About Reporting →

FY 2022-12-31

FAC accepted this audit on August 7, 2023 — management decision was due February 7, 2024.

2022-002
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Eligibility

FINDING 2022-002 Assistance Listing Number 21.023 COVID-19 Emergency Rental Assistance Program Federal Agency U.S. Department of Treasury Pass-through Agency Not applicable Award Numbers / Years 2022 City Departments Department of Housing Criteria: According to Treasury guidance, recipients of the Emergency Rental Assistance Program (ERAP) are expected to develop guidelines for determining eligibility of beneficiaries. The City contracted with a local agency to make eligibility determinations and authorize the related payments to beneficiaries based on the guidelines established by the City. The City purchased a software program to assist in the record-keeping and documentation of the case management process from intake to eligibility determinations to payment authorization. Condition/Context: After conducting an extensive analysis of payments made under ERAP, the City has determined that there are potential unallowable payments that were made to ineligible beneficiaries. In addition, the City noted that some eligibility determinations were made and approved by the same person employed by the contractor, resulting in a lack of internal controls over the process. The City is in the process of investigating the validity and extent of potential unallowable payments made. In a sample of 60 benefit payments made, we noted 8 instances where the eligibility determination was approved by the same person who made the determination. Our sample was not statistically valid. Effect: It is possible that program payments were made to ineligible participants. Questioned Costs: Questioned costs cannot be determined at this time. Cause: Payments to potentially ineligible beneficiaries were likely due to the large volume of applications processed by the contractor required in a short amount of time. According to Treasury guidelines, the burden of proof of meeting eligibility guidelines is low; therefore, applicants may have provided inaccurate data in order to receive payments under the program. The software system used by the contractor appears to be lacking certain controls that would ensure proper segregation of duties between personnel determining eligibility and personnel reviewing eligibility determinations. Recommendation: We recommend the City continue to investigate questionable cases to determine the validity of the payments made and to quantify the amount of ineligible payments made. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

FINDING 2022-002 Assistance Listing Number 21.023 COVID-19 Emergency Rental Assistance Program Federal Agency U.S. Department of Treasury Pass-through Agency Not applicable Award Numbers / Years 2022 City Departments Department of Housing Criteria: According to Treasury guidance, recipients of the Emergency Rental Assistance Program (ERAP) are expected to develop guidelines for determining eligibility of beneficiaries. The City contracted with a local agency to make eligibility determinations and authorize the related payments to beneficiaries based on the guidelines established by the City. The City purchased a software program to assist in the record-keeping and documentation of the case management process from intake to eligibility determinations to payment authorization. Condition/Context: After conducting an extensive analysis of payments made under ERAP, the City has determined that there are potential unallowable payments that were made to ineligible beneficiaries. In addition, the City noted that some eligibility determinations were made and approved by the same person employed by the contractor, resulting in a lack of internal controls over the process. The City is in the process of investigating the validity and extent of potential unallowable payments made. In a sample of 60 benefit payments made, we noted 8 instances where the eligibility determination was approved by the same person who made the determination. Our sample was not statistically valid. Effect: It is possible that program payments were made to ineligible participants. Questioned Costs: Questioned costs cannot be determined at this time. Cause: Payments to potentially ineligible beneficiaries were likely due to the large volume of applications processed by the contractor required in a short amount of time. According to Treasury guidelines, the burden of proof of meeting eligibility guidelines is low; therefore, applicants may have provided inaccurate data in order to receive payments under the program. The software system used by the contractor appears to be lacking certain controls that would ensure proper segregation of duties between personnel determining eligibility and personnel reviewing eligibility determinations. Recommendation: We recommend the City continue to investigate questionable cases to determine the validity of the payments made and to quantify the amount of ineligible payments made. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan.

Corrective Action Plan

FINDING 2022-002 As a result of the 2022 Single Audit, the Department of Housing (DOH) received an audit finding with respect to potential unallowable rental assistance payments made because of an internal control failure in the case management workflow that did not adequately segregate reviewer and approver duties. As a corrective action, DOH terminated its contractual agreement with its program administrator effective May 12, 2023. To disburse the remaining emergency rental assistance dollars, DOH has entered into a contractual agreement with the Illinois Housing Development Authority to be its new program administrator effective June 30, 2023. DOH is actively investigating questionable cases to quantify the total population and dollar amount of ineligible payments made. In addition, DOH is reviewing its case management workflow procedures to ensure clear segregation of duties in any future rental assistance program. Daniel Kay Hertz, DOH Director of Policy, will be responsible for ensuring that this corrective action plan is fully implemented by January 1, 2024.

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Eligibility →
2022-003
Activities Allowed or Unallowed
QUESTIONED COSTS

FINDING 2022-003 Assistance Listing Numbers 97.024 Emergency Food and Shelter National Board Program Federal Agency U.S. Department of Homeland Security Pass-through Agency Not Applicable Award Numbers / Years 2022 City Departments Office of Budget and Management Criteria: The Funding Guidance provided to the City by the Federal Emergency Management Agency states that the program does not allow the use of indirect cost rates. Administrative costs that support relief services are allowable. Limitations on the allowability of expenditures under federal programs apply to both the City as the direct recipient as well as any subrecipients awarded program funds by the City. Condition/Context: The transactions selected in our sample consisted of reimbursements to subrecipients. One of the five sampled transactions was for administrative costs charged to the program utilizing a percentage of direct costs rather than identifying specific administrative costs that support relief services. Our sample was not statistically valid. Effect: Unallowable costs may have been charged to the program by the City via its subrecipient agreements. Questioned Costs: Known questioned costs for ALN 97.024 consist of unsupported administrative cost reimbursements made to subrecipients in the amount of $230,902. Cause: City personnel responsible for administering the award did not prohibit subrecipients from including administrative costs charged as a percentage of direct costs in the program expenditures presented in their vouchers. Recommendation: We recommend the City determine the amount of ineligible administrative costs charged to the City and determine if the funds should be returned to the federal government or if they can be used to provide additional services under the program. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

FINDING 2022-003 Assistance Listing Numbers 97.024 Emergency Food and Shelter National Board Program Federal Agency U.S. Department of Homeland Security Pass-through Agency Not Applicable Award Numbers / Years 2022 City Departments Office of Budget and Management Criteria: The Funding Guidance provided to the City by the Federal Emergency Management Agency states that the program does not allow the use of indirect cost rates. Administrative costs that support relief services are allowable. Limitations on the allowability of expenditures under federal programs apply to both the City as the direct recipient as well as any subrecipients awarded program funds by the City. Condition/Context: The transactions selected in our sample consisted of reimbursements to subrecipients. One of the five sampled transactions was for administrative costs charged to the program utilizing a percentage of direct costs rather than identifying specific administrative costs that support relief services. Our sample was not statistically valid. Effect: Unallowable costs may have been charged to the program by the City via its subrecipient agreements. Questioned Costs: Known questioned costs for ALN 97.024 consist of unsupported administrative cost reimbursements made to subrecipients in the amount of $230,902. Cause: City personnel responsible for administering the award did not prohibit subrecipients from including administrative costs charged as a percentage of direct costs in the program expenditures presented in their vouchers. Recommendation: We recommend the City determine the amount of ineligible administrative costs charged to the City and determine if the funds should be returned to the federal government or if they can be used to provide additional services under the program. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan.

Corrective Action Plan

FINDING 2022-003 The City will transfer all ineligible administrative and indirect cost from the 97.024 ? Emergency Food and Shelter program no later than September 1, 2023. In addition, when administrative costs are allowed on a grant, delegate agencies will be required to maintain and provide adequate supporting documentation justifying the direct administrative cost charged to the program, which must be submitted through the City?s invoicing system. Assistant Budget Director Belczak at the Office of Budget and Management will be responsible for ensuring that this corrective action plan is implemented by the beginning of the fourth quarter in October 2023.

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed →
2022-004
Subrecipient Monitoring

FINDING 2022-004 Assistance Listing Numbers 97.024 Emergency Food and Shelter National Board Program Federal Agency U.S. Department of Homeland Security Pass-through Agency Not Applicable Award Numbers / Years 2022 City Departments Office of Budget and Management Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.332, all pass-through entities must ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and include specific award identification data as detailed in the Uniform Guidance. Condition/Context: Both of the subaward agreements tested did not contain the assistance listing number, federal award identification number, federal award date, and unique entity identifier in the original agreement. The grant agreement said that information would be forthcoming, however, no additional communications were provided to the subrecipients with this information. Our sample was not statistically valid. Effect: Subrecipients may not receive the appropriate subaward information. Questioned Costs: None noted. Cause: At the time the subawards were awarded to the subrecipeints, the missing award information was not known by the City. Subsequently, there was not a process to ensure the required information was provided once it became available. Recommendation: We recommend that the City provide the subrecipients with the appropriate award identification information. In addition, the City should consider whether a procedure is needed to revisit awards periodically to ensure that all required information has been provided to its subrecipients. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

FINDING 2022-004 Assistance Listing Numbers 97.024 Emergency Food and Shelter National Board Program Federal Agency U.S. Department of Homeland Security Pass-through Agency Not Applicable Award Numbers / Years 2022 City Departments Office of Budget and Management Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.332, all pass-through entities must ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and include specific award identification data as detailed in the Uniform Guidance. Condition/Context: Both of the subaward agreements tested did not contain the assistance listing number, federal award identification number, federal award date, and unique entity identifier in the original agreement. The grant agreement said that information would be forthcoming, however, no additional communications were provided to the subrecipients with this information. Our sample was not statistically valid. Effect: Subrecipients may not receive the appropriate subaward information. Questioned Costs: None noted. Cause: At the time the subawards were awarded to the subrecipeints, the missing award information was not known by the City. Subsequently, there was not a process to ensure the required information was provided once it became available. Recommendation: We recommend that the City provide the subrecipients with the appropriate award identification information. In addition, the City should consider whether a procedure is needed to revisit awards periodically to ensure that all required information has been provided to its subrecipients. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan.

Corrective Action Plan

FINDING 2022-004 The 2022 97.024 Emergency Food and Shelter National Board Program grant funding was received during a crisis resulting in a unique situation for the City of Chicago. The funding was provided before the federal government set up an award identifier (i.e., ALN/CFDA, CSFA), resulting in the Delegate Agency contract with the Department of Family Support Services (DFSS) containing only the name of the Grant. To address and prevent such issues in the future, the City's Office of Budget and Management (OBM) will run a Comprehensive Report quarterly to identify any placeholder award identifiers during funding setup. The Grants Management Unit within OBM will collaborate closely with the Department of Finance (DOF) to ensure the federal award identifiers are promptly updated in the financial system. Moreover, to ensure accuracy and compliance, the Grants Management Unit will work with the relevant contracting Department to update contracts with Delegate Agencies. This measure will guarantee that all necessary award identifiers are included, streamlining the funding process and ensuring proper tracking and reporting of federal grants. Assistant Budget Director Belczak at the Office of Budget and Management will be responsible for ensuring that this corrective action plan is implemented by the beginning of the fourth quarter in October 2023.

About Subrecipient Monitoring →

FY 2021-12-31

FAC accepted this audit on August 2, 2022 — management decision was due February 2, 2023.

2021-001
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability

FINDING 2021-001 Assistance Listing Numbers 14.239 Home Investments Partnership Program 93.044 Special Programs for the Aging - Title III, Part B - Grants for Supportive Services and Senior Centers 93.044 COVID-19 Special Programs for the Aging - Title III, Part B - Grants for Supportive Services and Senior Centers 93.889 National Bioterrorism Hospital Preparedness Program 93.914 HIV Emergency Relief Project Grants Federal Agencies 14.239: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development 93.044, 93.889, and 93.914: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Pass-through Agency 93.044: Illinois Department on Aging Award Numbers / Years 14.239: M21MC170201 93.044: CAREST32012, T32012, T32112, and T32212 93.889: U3REP190582C, and U3REP190582-02 93.914: H89HA00008-30 and H89HA00008-31 City Departments 14.239: Department of Housing 93.044: Department of Family and Support Services 93.889 and 93.914: Department of Public Health Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.303 requires the City to establish and maintain effective internal controls over federal awards, including salaries charged to those federal awards. The City's Personnel Activity Reporting (PAR) and Reconciliation Manual requires managers to have all submitted time reviewed and either approved or rejected by the end of the following week in which the time is submitted. Condition/Context: For two of the 40 employees? monthly time sampled, the supervisor's approval of time charged to awards did not equal 100% of the total time submitted by the employee. The time submitted for the two employees for the month selected were 147 hours and 154 hours. However, the time approved by the supervisor was 7 hours and 77 hours, respectively. Our sample was not statistically valid. Upon further inspection of the approval spreadsheets provided by the City for the departments listed above, a total of 262 instances occurred in which the supervisor did not approve 100% of the employee's time submitted out of a total of 7,607 time entry submissions. Effect: Without approval of all the time charged to grant programs, this could result in payroll being charged to federal programs that is unsupported by records. Questioned Costs: None noted. FINDING 2021-001 (cont.) Cause: Supervisor approval of employee time submissions is a manual control and unapproved time may continue to pass through the PAR System and get charged to a federal program. Recommendation: We recommend utilization and review of the Time Approval Rates available from the PAR System to identify instances where time submitted is not approved at a rate of 100%. If the time approved is not 100% for any given employee, we recommend that the Office of Budget and Management work with the responsible supervisor to approve or deny the time submitted. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

FINDING 2021-001 Assistance Listing Numbers 14.239 Home Investments Partnership Program 93.044 Special Programs for the Aging - Title III, Part B - Grants for Supportive Services and Senior Centers 93.044 COVID-19 Special Programs for the Aging - Title III, Part B - Grants for Supportive Services and Senior Centers 93.889 National Bioterrorism Hospital Preparedness Program 93.914 HIV Emergency Relief Project Grants Federal Agencies 14.239: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development 93.044, 93.889, and 93.914: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Pass-through Agency 93.044: Illinois Department on Aging Award Numbers / Years 14.239: M21MC170201 93.044: CAREST32012, T32012, T32112, and T32212 93.889: U3REP190582C, and U3REP190582-02 93.914: H89HA00008-30 and H89HA00008-31 City Departments 14.239: Department of Housing 93.044: Department of Family and Support Services 93.889 and 93.914: Department of Public Health Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.303 requires the City to establish and maintain effective internal controls over federal awards, including salaries charged to those federal awards. The City's Personnel Activity Reporting (PAR) and Reconciliation Manual requires managers to have all submitted time reviewed and either approved or rejected by the end of the following week in which the time is submitted. Condition/Context: For two of the 40 employees? monthly time sampled, the supervisor's approval of time charged to awards did not equal 100% of the total time submitted by the employee. The time submitted for the two employees for the month selected were 147 hours and 154 hours. However, the time approved by the supervisor was 7 hours and 77 hours, respectively. Our sample was not statistically valid. Upon further inspection of the approval spreadsheets provided by the City for the departments listed above, a total of 262 instances occurred in which the supervisor did not approve 100% of the employee's time submitted out of a total of 7,607 time entry submissions. Effect: Without approval of all the time charged to grant programs, this could result in payroll being charged to federal programs that is unsupported by records. Questioned Costs: None noted. FINDING 2021-001 (cont.) Cause: Supervisor approval of employee time submissions is a manual control and unapproved time may continue to pass through the PAR System and get charged to a federal program. Recommendation: We recommend utilization and review of the Time Approval Rates available from the PAR System to identify instances where time submitted is not approved at a rate of 100%. If the time approved is not 100% for any given employee, we recommend that the Office of Budget and Management work with the responsible supervisor to approve or deny the time submitted. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan.

Corrective Action Plan

FINDING 2021-001 The City concurs with this funding and has modified the Tableau reconciliation formulas and reports to reflect all non-approved time under the ?Non-PAR? column, which would transfer all unapproved time to a non-grant funding source. This system control will ensure that all unapproved time is not charged to a grant program. In accordance with the Personnel Activity Reporting and Reconciliation policy, each department is responsible for ensuring that all employees funded or providing services for a federal and/or state funded grant is active in the PAR System and assigned to the appropriate PAR Group and Cost objective. Departments can monitor employee and manager time entry and approval in the PAR system, which can be accessed at http://chicagopar.cityofchicago.org/. In addition, OBM will provide a Tableau dashboard to provide additional live data views on underreporting employees and managers. Departments will be responsible for reviewing the dashboard reports frequently, to ensure that all time entered has been approved or rejected by the manager. OBM will schedule monthly meetings to review any under-reporting employee and unapproved manager time. OBM conducts a quarterly reconciliation with each department and will review all final approved time before departments can process the appropriate expense transfer. Any unapproved PAR time and expense will be charged against a viable funding source. Deputy Commissioner Rafac at the Department of Family and Support Services will actively coordinate with employees and Managers to ensure all appropriate time is entered, reviewed and approved/rejected, which will allow for the processing of the PAR reconciliation and subsequent reporting to the grantor. Deputy Commissioner Emmanuel at the Department of Public Health, will actively coordinate with employees and Managers to ensure all appropriate time is entered, reviewed and approved/rejected, which will allow for the processing of the PAR reconciliation and subsequent reporting to the grantor. Deputy Commissioner Schmitz at the Department of Planning and Development and the Department of Housing will actively coordinate with employees and Managers to ensure all appropriate time is entered, reviewed and approved/rejected, which will allow for the processing of the PAR reconciliation and subsequent reporting to the grantor. Deputy Budget Director Vaughn at the Office of Budget and Management will be responsible for ensuring that the PAR reporting and reconciliation process allocates the approved time and effort reported by an employee to a specific grant program/fund. Corrective action plan will be implemented by December 31, 2023.

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →
2021-002
Cost Allowability
QUESTIONED COSTS

FINDING 2021-002 Assistance Listing Numbers 93.044 Special Programs for the Aging, Title III, Part B, Grants for Supportive Services and Senior Centers 93.044 COVID-19 Special Programs for the Aging, Title III, Part B, Grants for Supportive Services and Senior Centers 93.914 HIV Emergency Relief Project Grants Federal Agency U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Pass-through Agency 93.044: Illinois Department on Aging Award Numbers / Years 93.044: CAREST32012, T32012, and T32212 93.914: H89HA00008-30 City Departments 93.044: Department of Family and Support Services 93.914: Department of Public Health Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.430(i)(1)(viii)(C) requires the system of internal controls to include processes to conduct after-the-fact reviews of interim charges made to federal awards based on budget estimates used to charge salaries and wages. All necessary adjustments must be made such that the final amount charged to the federal award is accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Condition/Context: The Personnel Activity Report (PAR) and Reconciliation process occurs quarterly to reconcile the budgeted amount of salaries and wages to the actual salaries and wages that should be charged to a grant award. The Special Programs for the Aging - Title III, Part B ? Grants for Supportive Services and Senior Centers (awards CAREST32012 and T32012) closed on September 30, 2021. However, the 4th quarter reconciliations were not completed prior to grant closeout and final report submission to the grantor. Therefore, unsupported payroll costs were charged to these awards. Additionally, award T32212 did not close during the audit period, but included unsupported payroll costs. FINDING 2021-002 (cont.) The HIV Emergency Relief Project Grants (award H89HA00008-30) closed on February 28, 2021, and the final report was submitted to the grantor on July 31, 2021. No payroll was charged to the fund in the accounting system or the PAR System beyond the first quarter, however, the City did not identify an adjustment to be made to the award fund until the 4th quarter reconciliation, which was after the final report was submitted to the grantor. Therefore, unsupported payroll costs were charged to this award. Additionally, time worked by employees in March 2021 were charged to this award after closeout. Effect: There was unsupported payroll charged to the federal awards. Questioned Costs: Questioned costs were calculated by comparing the amounts reported in the general ledger and included in reimbursement requests to the grantor with the amounts calculated by the PAR System. For ALN 93.914, questioned costs totaled $43,318. For ALN 93.044, questioned costs totaled $60,467 for the COVID-19 portion and $426,757 for the non-COVID-19 portion. Cause: The grant was closed prior to the City completing the quarterly PAR reconciliations, and therefore adjustments could not be made. Additionally, the City payroll was not posted timely to the system to allow for the quarterly PAR reconciliations to be completed timely. Recommendation: We recommend the City post payroll and perform the quarterly PAR reconciliations on a timely basis. Additionally, the City should be cognizant of grant award closeout dates. In cases where adjustments must be made after closeout, a process to charge those expenditures to another funding source should be implemented. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

FINDING 2021-002 Assistance Listing Numbers 93.044 Special Programs for the Aging, Title III, Part B, Grants for Supportive Services and Senior Centers 93.044 COVID-19 Special Programs for the Aging, Title III, Part B, Grants for Supportive Services and Senior Centers 93.914 HIV Emergency Relief Project Grants Federal Agency U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Pass-through Agency 93.044: Illinois Department on Aging Award Numbers / Years 93.044: CAREST32012, T32012, and T32212 93.914: H89HA00008-30 City Departments 93.044: Department of Family and Support Services 93.914: Department of Public Health Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.430(i)(1)(viii)(C) requires the system of internal controls to include processes to conduct after-the-fact reviews of interim charges made to federal awards based on budget estimates used to charge salaries and wages. All necessary adjustments must be made such that the final amount charged to the federal award is accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Condition/Context: The Personnel Activity Report (PAR) and Reconciliation process occurs quarterly to reconcile the budgeted amount of salaries and wages to the actual salaries and wages that should be charged to a grant award. The Special Programs for the Aging - Title III, Part B ? Grants for Supportive Services and Senior Centers (awards CAREST32012 and T32012) closed on September 30, 2021. However, the 4th quarter reconciliations were not completed prior to grant closeout and final report submission to the grantor. Therefore, unsupported payroll costs were charged to these awards. Additionally, award T32212 did not close during the audit period, but included unsupported payroll costs. FINDING 2021-002 (cont.) The HIV Emergency Relief Project Grants (award H89HA00008-30) closed on February 28, 2021, and the final report was submitted to the grantor on July 31, 2021. No payroll was charged to the fund in the accounting system or the PAR System beyond the first quarter, however, the City did not identify an adjustment to be made to the award fund until the 4th quarter reconciliation, which was after the final report was submitted to the grantor. Therefore, unsupported payroll costs were charged to this award. Additionally, time worked by employees in March 2021 were charged to this award after closeout. Effect: There was unsupported payroll charged to the federal awards. Questioned Costs: Questioned costs were calculated by comparing the amounts reported in the general ledger and included in reimbursement requests to the grantor with the amounts calculated by the PAR System. For ALN 93.914, questioned costs totaled $43,318. For ALN 93.044, questioned costs totaled $60,467 for the COVID-19 portion and $426,757 for the non-COVID-19 portion. Cause: The grant was closed prior to the City completing the quarterly PAR reconciliations, and therefore adjustments could not be made. Additionally, the City payroll was not posted timely to the system to allow for the quarterly PAR reconciliations to be completed timely. Recommendation: We recommend the City post payroll and perform the quarterly PAR reconciliations on a timely basis. Additionally, the City should be cognizant of grant award closeout dates. In cases where adjustments must be made after closeout, a process to charge those expenditures to another funding source should be implemented. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan.

Corrective Action Plan

FINDING 2021-002 The City concurs with this finding, which is a result of the timing of the various grant reporting and performance schedules, timing of the City?s costing verification and payroll processing, and reconciliation process. Grant programs are executed on different schedules and have varying performance and budget terms, as well as reporting requirements. The City utilizes standard general ledger reports provided through the Financial Management and Purchasing System (FMPS) and Business Objects system, identifies all expenses posted against certain funds and accounts, which are used to prepare and submit the financial reports to all grantors. If the grant requires the submission of a financial report on a specific schedule, the initial expenses which were reported in the general ledger are used to comply with the grantor reporting requirements; necessary adjustments are revised/submitted (when permitted) during the subsequent reporting period or during the closeout schedule and are based on the expenditure details provided in the general ledger. The City?s budget system does not allow for the allocation of position cost across multiple funds; therefore, the City utilizes the costing process to identify the allocation of the budgeted employee across multiple funds, cost centers, and/or reporting category. This process requires manual validation and can delay the processing of payroll. The Office of Budget and Management (OBM) runs payroll reports monthly that are utilized in the Personnel Activity Reporting (PAR) and during the reconciliation process. These reports are run when final payroll expenses are posted to the City?s general ledger on a schedule determined by the Department of Finance (DOF). Delayed processing and posting of payroll expenses directly impacted the late processing of the PAR and reconciliation process, which resulted in under and/or over reporting of salary expenses across certain grant funds. As a corrective action, the City added resources to ensure that payroll costing are completed timely, which will allow for the timely posting of payroll. In addition, the Department of Finance will coordinate with department leads and OBM prior to submitting financial reports to grantors to ensure that cost accurately reflects all reconciled time; any personnel expense that is included in the general ledger without sufficient reconciliation confirmation will not be submitted to the grantor. In addition to the immediate measures, the City is actively working to procure a new payroll system that will include enhancements and strengthened controls to budget and allocate position cost across multiple funds and will also facilitate a more streamlined payroll processing process. Deputy Comptroller Webster at the Department of Finance will be responsible for ensuring timely posting of the City?s payroll to allow for the processing of the quarterly PAR reconciliation. Deputy Comptroller James at the Department of Finance in the Grants and Project Accounting Division will be responsible for coordinating with the lead departments and OBM when submitting financial reports to the grantor. Department of Finance will provide departments with guidance to ensure accurate submission of eligible expenses against grant programs. Director of Finance Ciezczak at the Department of Family and Support Services will actively coordinate with the DOF and OBM on required financial reporting. Deputy Commissioner Emmanuel at the Department of Public Health will actively coordinate with the DOF and OBM on required financial reporting. Deputy Budget Director Vaughn at the Office of Budget and Management will be responsible for ensuring that the PAR reporting and reconciliation is prepared and submitted by each relevant department on a quarterly basis. Corrective action plan will be implemented by December 31, 2023.

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →
2021-003
Subrecipient Monitoring

FINDING 2021-003 Assistance Listing Number 21.019 COVID-19 Coronavirus Relief Fund Federal Agency U.S. Department of Treasury Pass-through Agency Not Applicable Award Number / Year 2020 City Department Department of Housing Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR Part 200.332, pass-through entities must evaluate subrecipient risk of noncompliance with federal awards and monitor subrecipient activities to ensure the subaward is used for authorized purposes. Condition/Context: Out of nine subrecipients selected for testing, it was noted that one subrecipient was not subject to a risk assessment or monitoring by the Chicago Department of Housing, the awarding City department. Our sample was not statistically valid. Effect: Noncompliance could occur in a subrecipient that is not subject to monitoring procedures. Questioned Costs: None noted. Cause: The Department of Housing did not follow its policies in regard to subrecipient monitoring. Recommendation: We recommend the Chicago Department of Housing review its procedures for subrecipient monitoring to ensure that appropriate risk assessments and monitoring of activities are completed on a regular basis. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

FINDING 2021-003 Assistance Listing Number 21.019 COVID-19 Coronavirus Relief Fund Federal Agency U.S. Department of Treasury Pass-through Agency Not Applicable Award Number / Year 2020 City Department Department of Housing Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR Part 200.332, pass-through entities must evaluate subrecipient risk of noncompliance with federal awards and monitor subrecipient activities to ensure the subaward is used for authorized purposes. Condition/Context: Out of nine subrecipients selected for testing, it was noted that one subrecipient was not subject to a risk assessment or monitoring by the Chicago Department of Housing, the awarding City department. Our sample was not statistically valid. Effect: Noncompliance could occur in a subrecipient that is not subject to monitoring procedures. Questioned Costs: None noted. Cause: The Department of Housing did not follow its policies in regard to subrecipient monitoring. Recommendation: We recommend the Chicago Department of Housing review its procedures for subrecipient monitoring to ensure that appropriate risk assessments and monitoring of activities are completed on a regular basis. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan.

Corrective Action Plan

FINDING 2021-003 Currently, Department of Housing (DOH) evaluates subrecipient risk during its subaward solicitation process by incorporating certain scoring criteria into its Requests for Proposals (RFPs) and subsequent application reviews and award decisions. However, this is not conducted uniformly across DOH solicitations and programs. As a corrective action, DOH Finance will use a standard risk assessment questionnaire, developed by the city?s Department of Finance (DOF) and Office of Budget and Management (OBM), to evaluate each potential subrecipient uniformly in compliance with the requirements found in 2 CFR Part 200.332. All subrecipient award packets will be reviewed and approved by the DOH Finance Deputy Commissioner to ensure a risk assessment was conducted using the questionnaire, before being sent to the DOF for activation. In tandem, DOH Finance will review and revise accordingly its current Delegate Agency Fiscal Monitoring and Audit Policy to align with the new standardized risk assessment process. This revised policy will clearly identify monitoring plans tied to specific tiers of risk. Lastly, DOH Finance will request a new staff resource to help coordinate and oversee these new risk evaluation and monitoring policies and procedures. In addition to correcting subrecipient risk evaluation and monitoring holistically, DOH will use its new standard risk assessment questionnaire and monitoring process to assess this COVID-19 CRF contract retroactively to ensure no compliance issues arise. Finance Deputy Commissioner Schmitz at the Department of Housing will be responsible for ensuring that this corrective action plan is implemented by December 31, 2023.

About Subrecipient Monitoring →
2021-004
Reporting

FINDING 2021-004 Assistance Listing Number 21.023 COVID-19 Emergency Rental Assistance Program Federal Agency U.S. Department of Treasury Pass-through Agency Not Applicable Award Number / Year 2021 City Department Department of Housing Criteria: The U.S. Department of Treasury established a variety of reporting requirements in relation to the Emergency Rental Assistance Program. Monthly reports were due 15 days after the end of the month and due dates for certain quarterly reports were extended until November 29, 2021. Condition/Context: We included two monthly reports in our sample and one of them was submitted 12 days after the due date. We also included two quarterly reports in our sample and one of them was submitted 2 days after the due date. Our sample was not statistically valid. Effect: The City did not meet the reporting timeline requirements established by the grantor. Questioned Costs: None noted. Cause: The specific cause has not been determined. Recommendation: We recommend the City review its reporting procedures to ensure that reports are submitted by the established due dates. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

FINDING 2021-004 Assistance Listing Number 21.023 COVID-19 Emergency Rental Assistance Program Federal Agency U.S. Department of Treasury Pass-through Agency Not Applicable Award Number / Year 2021 City Department Department of Housing Criteria: The U.S. Department of Treasury established a variety of reporting requirements in relation to the Emergency Rental Assistance Program. Monthly reports were due 15 days after the end of the month and due dates for certain quarterly reports were extended until November 29, 2021. Condition/Context: We included two monthly reports in our sample and one of them was submitted 12 days after the due date. We also included two quarterly reports in our sample and one of them was submitted 2 days after the due date. Our sample was not statistically valid. Effect: The City did not meet the reporting timeline requirements established by the grantor. Questioned Costs: None noted. Cause: The specific cause has not been determined. Recommendation: We recommend the City review its reporting procedures to ensure that reports are submitted by the established due dates. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan.

Corrective Action Plan

FINDING 2021-004 Currently, Treasury reporting for the Emergency Rental Assistance Program is conducted primarily by the Department of Housing (DOH) Policy Bureau, and the Treasury reporting system is not integrated into other DOH grant systems and processes to provide a wider view for DOH Finance as to the status of report submissions. As a corrective action, DOH Policy will integrate its Treasury reporting process with DOH Finance?s grant reporting process by establishing an internal shared calendar that outlines all reporting deadlines through the remaining duration of the grant program. This calendar will send notifications of upcoming deadlines to all pertinent staff in DOH Policy and DOH Finance at the end of each reporting period, 15 calendar days in advance of report due dates, to allow for adequate report preparation time. This calendar will then send additional notifications on the actual deadlines. Once DOH Policy submits the report in the Treasury system, on or before the reporting deadline, DOH Policy must circulate a final copy of the submitted report, with time-stamped proof of submission, to DOH Finance for validation and record keeping. Director of Policy Hertz at the Department of Housing will be responsible for ensuring that this corrective action plan is implemented by December 31, 2023.

About Reporting →
2021-005
Reporting
REPEAT

FINDING 2021-005 Assistance Listing Number 14.241 Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS Federal Agency U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Pass-through Agency Not applicable Award Numbers / Years ILH18F001, ILH19F001, ILH20F001, ILH21F001, and ILH180010 City Department Department of Public Health (CDPH) This is a partial repeat of Finding 2020-003 from the previous year. Criteria: Under the requirements of the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) (Pub. L. No. 109-282) that are codified in 2 CFR Part 170, direct recipients of grants or cooperative agreements who make first tier subawards of $30,000 or more are required to register in the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act Subaward Reporting System (FSRS) and report subaward data through FSRS. The subaward data reported must accurately represent the key data elements supported by the source documentation. These key data elements include the following: Subaward date, subawardee identification number, amount of subaward, subaward obligation / action date, and subaward number. This reporting must happen no later than the last day of the month following the month in which the subaward/subaward amendment obligation was made. Condition/Context: Five subawards were sampled related to Assistance Listing Number 14.241. CDPH did not report one of its first tier subawards of $30,000 or more through FSRS by the required due date. Our sample was not statistically valid. CFDA No. Transactions Tested Subward not reported Report not timely Subaward amount incorrect Subaward missing key elements 14.241 5 1 0 0 0 Dollar Amount of Tested Transactions Subaward not reported Report not timely Subaward amount incorrect Subaward missing key elements $2,664,256 $1,000,000 $0 $0 $0 Effect: The subaward mentioned above was not submitted timely. Questioned Costs: None noted. Cause: There is uncertainty as to when specific awards are available for reporting within FSRS; therefore, City staff are not always aware of when the reporting timelines begin. Recommendation: We recommend that City staff responsible for reporting establish regular system checks to help avoid risks of late or missed reporting requirements. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

FINDING 2021-005 Assistance Listing Number 14.241 Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS Federal Agency U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Pass-through Agency Not applicable Award Numbers / Years ILH18F001, ILH19F001, ILH20F001, ILH21F001, and ILH180010 City Department Department of Public Health (CDPH) This is a partial repeat of Finding 2020-003 from the previous year. Criteria: Under the requirements of the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) (Pub. L. No. 109-282) that are codified in 2 CFR Part 170, direct recipients of grants or cooperative agreements who make first tier subawards of $30,000 or more are required to register in the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act Subaward Reporting System (FSRS) and report subaward data through FSRS. The subaward data reported must accurately represent the key data elements supported by the source documentation. These key data elements include the following: Subaward date, subawardee identification number, amount of subaward, subaward obligation / action date, and subaward number. This reporting must happen no later than the last day of the month following the month in which the subaward/subaward amendment obligation was made. Condition/Context: Five subawards were sampled related to Assistance Listing Number 14.241. CDPH did not report one of its first tier subawards of $30,000 or more through FSRS by the required due date. Our sample was not statistically valid. CFDA No. Transactions Tested Subward not reported Report not timely Subaward amount incorrect Subaward missing key elements 14.241 5 1 0 0 0 Dollar Amount of Tested Transactions Subaward not reported Report not timely Subaward amount incorrect Subaward missing key elements $2,664,256 $1,000,000 $0 $0 $0 Effect: The subaward mentioned above was not submitted timely. Questioned Costs: None noted. Cause: There is uncertainty as to when specific awards are available for reporting within FSRS; therefore, City staff are not always aware of when the reporting timelines begin. Recommendation: We recommend that City staff responsible for reporting establish regular system checks to help avoid risks of late or missed reporting requirements. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan.

Corrective Action Plan

FINDING 2021-005 The Contract Review Specialist from the Contracts unit will enter contract data into the FFATA system within 30 days of the contract being executed. He/she will save a PDF of the FFATA report. The staff and the Contracts Administrator will have a standing meeting on the 4th Monday of every month to review the FFATA reports and to confirm that every executed contract was properly entered into the FFATA system for that month. Contracts Administrator Pfeiffer at the Department of Public Health will be responsible for ensuring that this corrective action plan is implemented by September 1, 2022.

Prior Finding References

2020-003

About Reporting →
2021-006
Cost Allowability

FINDING 2021-006 Assistance Listing Numbers 14.239 Home Investment Partnerships Program 93.889 National Bioterrorism Hospital Preparedness Program 93.914 HIV Emergency Relief Project Grants Federal Agencies 14.239: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 93.889 and 93.914: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Pass-through Agency Not applicable Award Numbers / Years 14.239: M19MC170201 93.889: U3REP190582C and U3REP190582-02 93.914: H89HA00008-31 City Department Department of Finance Criteria: 2 CFR section 200, Appendix VII, paragraph D requires governmental units to submit the indirect cost rate proposals to their cognizant agency within six months after the close of the governmental unit's fiscal year. Condition/Context: We selected the 2021 indirect cost rate proposals for the Department of Public Health and Department of Housing for testing. The indirect cost rate proposals were due to the cognizant agency by June 30, 2021, however they were not submitted until June 16, 2022. Effect: The 2021 indirect cost rate proposals were not submitted timely. Questioned Costs: None noted. Cause: The indirect cost rate proposals were not submitted timely due to an oversight in the Grant and Project Accounting Division of the Department of Finance. Recommendation: We recommend that controls are established to ensure timely submission of the indirect cost rate proposals. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

FINDING 2021-006 Assistance Listing Numbers 14.239 Home Investment Partnerships Program 93.889 National Bioterrorism Hospital Preparedness Program 93.914 HIV Emergency Relief Project Grants Federal Agencies 14.239: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 93.889 and 93.914: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Pass-through Agency Not applicable Award Numbers / Years 14.239: M19MC170201 93.889: U3REP190582C and U3REP190582-02 93.914: H89HA00008-31 City Department Department of Finance Criteria: 2 CFR section 200, Appendix VII, paragraph D requires governmental units to submit the indirect cost rate proposals to their cognizant agency within six months after the close of the governmental unit's fiscal year. Condition/Context: We selected the 2021 indirect cost rate proposals for the Department of Public Health and Department of Housing for testing. The indirect cost rate proposals were due to the cognizant agency by June 30, 2021, however they were not submitted until June 16, 2022. Effect: The 2021 indirect cost rate proposals were not submitted timely. Questioned Costs: None noted. Cause: The indirect cost rate proposals were not submitted timely due to an oversight in the Grant and Project Accounting Division of the Department of Finance. Recommendation: We recommend that controls are established to ensure timely submission of the indirect cost rate proposals. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan.

Corrective Action Plan

FINDING 2021-006 The Department of Finance (DOF) through its Grant and Project Accounting Division (GPAD) will enhance controls to ensure that indirect cost rate proposals are submitted timely as required by uniform guidance. These controls will include measures to work in collaboration with contracted consultants specializing in the preparation of Indirect cost allocation plans. GPAD?s Assistant Comptroller is responsible for overseeing the coordination of indirect cost rates proposals for city spending departments that require approved federal negotiated indirect cost rate agreements. A timeline schedule will be implemented and followed to ensure that the indirect cost rate proposals are submitted to the cognizant agency within at least 30 days prior to the June 30th deadline. Deputy Comptroller James at the Department of Finance will be responsible for ensuring that this corrective action plan is implemented by December 31, 2023.

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2020-12-31

FAC accepted this audit on July 30, 2021 — management decision was due January 30, 2022.

2020-002
Cost Allowability
QUESTIONED COSTS

FINDING 2020-002 CFDA No. 14.218 Community Development Block Grant Federal Agency U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Pass-through Agency Not applicable Award Number / Year B-20-MC-17-0006 / 2020 City Departments Department of Law Criteria: Per guidance provided in 2 CFR part 200.430, charges to federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: 1) Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated; 2) Be incorporated into the official records of the non-federal entity; and 3) Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non-federal entity, not exceeding 100% of compensated activities. Condition/Context: The Department of Law uses semi-annual certification forms to document employee salaries and wages. Two out of the forty payroll transactions sampled were related to employees within the Department of Law. Of these payroll transactions selected, both employees from the Department of Law had variances between the amount charged to the award and the amount that should have been charged to the award based on the employees' time actually spent on the grant as documented on the semi-annual certification forms. An entry was not made to true up the amount charged to the grant as there was no reconciliation completed by this department to verify time and effort spent on the grant. This resulted in an overcharge of payroll expenditures to the grant. The sample was not statistically valid. Effect: The department overcharged two employees? salaries to the federal award. Questioned Costs: Questioned costs were determined to be $2,961 for CFDA No. 14.218. This amount was calculated by comparing the information on the semi-annual certifications to the actual charges made to the program for the employees and pay periods selected. Cause: The department does not have a consistent system for obtaining and reviewing the necessary supporting documentation and/or making look-back adjustments to record actual time and effort as required under the Uniform Guidance for payroll changes. Recommendation: We recommend the Department of Law consider participation in the City's electronic process for tracking grant time, including consistent use of quarterly reconciliations and completing the resulting adjustments that are derived from these reconciliations. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

FINDING 2020-002 CFDA No. 14.218 Community Development Block Grant Federal Agency U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Pass-through Agency Not applicable Award Number / Year B-20-MC-17-0006 / 2020 City Departments Department of Law Criteria: Per guidance provided in 2 CFR part 200.430, charges to federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: 1) Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated; 2) Be incorporated into the official records of the non-federal entity; and 3) Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non-federal entity, not exceeding 100% of compensated activities. Condition/Context: The Department of Law uses semi-annual certification forms to document employee salaries and wages. Two out of the forty payroll transactions sampled were related to employees within the Department of Law. Of these payroll transactions selected, both employees from the Department of Law had variances between the amount charged to the award and the amount that should have been charged to the award based on the employees' time actually spent on the grant as documented on the semi-annual certification forms. An entry was not made to true up the amount charged to the grant as there was no reconciliation completed by this department to verify time and effort spent on the grant. This resulted in an overcharge of payroll expenditures to the grant. The sample was not statistically valid. Effect: The department overcharged two employees? salaries to the federal award. Questioned Costs: Questioned costs were determined to be $2,961 for CFDA No. 14.218. This amount was calculated by comparing the information on the semi-annual certifications to the actual charges made to the program for the employees and pay periods selected. Cause: The department does not have a consistent system for obtaining and reviewing the necessary supporting documentation and/or making look-back adjustments to record actual time and effort as required under the Uniform Guidance for payroll changes. Recommendation: We recommend the Department of Law consider participation in the City's electronic process for tracking grant time, including consistent use of quarterly reconciliations and completing the resulting adjustments that are derived from these reconciliations. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan.

Corrective Action Plan

FINDING 2020-002 As a result of the 2020 Single Audit, the Department of Law received an audit finding for inaccurately charging salary cost to the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), based on completed semi-annual certification forms, which were not properly reconciled against the appropriate funding source. As a corrective action response, the Law Department will no longer directly charge employees to the CDBG program, all employees will be charged to a non-federal funding source as of January 1, 2022. Latoya Vaughn, Deputy Budget Director, in the Office of Budget and Management will be responsible for ensuring that this corrective action plan is implemented by January 1, 2022.

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →
2020-003
Reporting

FINDING 2020-003 CFDA Nos. 14.218 Community Development Block Grant 93.268 COVID-19 Immunization Cooperative Agreements Federal Agencies U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Pass-through Agency Not applicable Award Number / Year B-20-MC-17-0006 / 2020 1 NH23IP922613-01-00 / 2020 City Departments Department of Housing (DOH) Department of Family and Support Services (DFSS) Department of Public Health (CDPH) Criteria: Under the requirements of the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) (Pub. L. No. 109-282) that are codified in 2 CFR Part 170, direct recipients of grants or cooperative agreements who make first tier subawards of $30,000 or more are required to register in the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act Subaward Reporting System (FSRS) and report subaward data through FSRS. The subaward data reported must accurately represent the key data elements supported by the source documentation. These key data elements include the following: Subaward date, subawardee DUNS #, amount of subaward, subaward obligation / action date, and subaward number. This reporting must happen no later than the last day of the month following the month in which the subaward/subaward amendment obligation was made. Condition/Context: Subawards sampled across major programs were found to be submitted beyond the due date, not reported at all, or reported using the wrong amount. Sample sizes and errors found during testing are noted below. Our sample was not statistically valid. {See table in single audit report.} Effect: The City is not in compliance with the reporting guidelines required by FFATA.FINDING 2020-003 (cont.) Questioned Costs: None noted. Cause: Due to staff turnover and transitioning, the DOH and DFSS did not have a sufficient amount of trained staff available to report their first tier subawards through FSRS in a timely manner. In addition, the subawards reported by DFSS weren't being reviewed in detail for accuracy compared to the subawards' source documentation. The award in question for CDPH was a COVID supplemental add-on to the original award agreement and it was not identified by department personnel in the reporting system. Recommendation: We recommend the City ensure that reporting under FFATA is completed for all relevant subawards by the required deadline, and the key data elements reported for each of the subawards is reviewed for accuracy compared to the subawards' source documentation. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

FINDING 2020-003 CFDA Nos. 14.218 Community Development Block Grant 93.268 COVID-19 Immunization Cooperative Agreements Federal Agencies U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Pass-through Agency Not applicable Award Number / Year B-20-MC-17-0006 / 2020 1 NH23IP922613-01-00 / 2020 City Departments Department of Housing (DOH) Department of Family and Support Services (DFSS) Department of Public Health (CDPH) Criteria: Under the requirements of the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) (Pub. L. No. 109-282) that are codified in 2 CFR Part 170, direct recipients of grants or cooperative agreements who make first tier subawards of $30,000 or more are required to register in the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act Subaward Reporting System (FSRS) and report subaward data through FSRS. The subaward data reported must accurately represent the key data elements supported by the source documentation. These key data elements include the following: Subaward date, subawardee DUNS #, amount of subaward, subaward obligation / action date, and subaward number. This reporting must happen no later than the last day of the month following the month in which the subaward/subaward amendment obligation was made. Condition/Context: Subawards sampled across major programs were found to be submitted beyond the due date, not reported at all, or reported using the wrong amount. Sample sizes and errors found during testing are noted below. Our sample was not statistically valid. {See table in single audit report.} Effect: The City is not in compliance with the reporting guidelines required by FFATA.FINDING 2020-003 (cont.) Questioned Costs: None noted. Cause: Due to staff turnover and transitioning, the DOH and DFSS did not have a sufficient amount of trained staff available to report their first tier subawards through FSRS in a timely manner. In addition, the subawards reported by DFSS weren't being reviewed in detail for accuracy compared to the subawards' source documentation. The award in question for CDPH was a COVID supplemental add-on to the original award agreement and it was not identified by department personnel in the reporting system. Recommendation: We recommend the City ensure that reporting under FFATA is completed for all relevant subawards by the required deadline, and the key data elements reported for each of the subawards is reviewed for accuracy compared to the subawards' source documentation. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan.

Corrective Action Plan

FINDING 2020-003 As a result of the 2020 Single Audit, the Department of Housing (DOH) received an audit finding for non-compliance regarding the timely reporting for subawards under the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program. Currently, the FSRS does not provide any notifications when the federal agency uploads the contract, which would allow the City to report against the associated contract. In the absence of this notification, the DOH has established an internal system to monitor the FFATA System monthly to confirm the uploading of the contract and will ensure that all contracts are uploaded withing 30 days of the contract execution. When the federal agency uploads the grant award in FSRS, DOH will utilize the subaward source documentation to guide the FFATA data entry, which will be reviewed internally by DOH staff. After the data is uploaded and upon submission, DOH will record screenshots that identify the date and time of the submission. This information will be submitted to the Office of Budget and Management (OBM) and a copy will also be maintained electronically for reference at DOH. Alessandra Budnik, Contracts Administrator in the DOH, will be responsible for ensuring that this corrective action plan is implemented by January 1, 2022. As a result of the 2020 Single Audit, the Department of Family and Support Services (DFSS) received an audit finding for non-compliance regarding the timely reporting for subawards under the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program. Currently, the FSRS does not provide any notifications when the federal agency uploads the contract, which would allow the City to report against the associated contract. In the absence of this notification, the Department of Family and Support Services (DFSS) has established an internal system to monitor the FFATA System monthly to confirm the uploading of the contract and will ensure that all contracts are uploaded withing 30 days of the contract execution. In addition, all information entered will be verified by DFSS staff for accuracy prior to submission, based on support documentation. When the federal agency uploads the contract in FSRS, DFSS will utilize the subaward source documentation to guide the FFATA data entry, which will be reviewed internally by DFSS staff. After the data is uploaded and upon submission, DFSS will record screenshots that identify the date and time of the submission. This information will be submitted to the Office of Budget and Management (OBM) and a copy will also be maintained electronically for reference at DFSS. Raymond Barrett, Director of Research and Development, in the DFSS will be responsible for ensuring that the corrective action plan for DOH and DFSS is implemented by January 1, 2022. As a result of the 2020 Single Audit, the Department of Public Health (DPH) received an audit finding for non-compliance regarding the timely reporting for subawards under the Immunization Cooperative Agreements program. Currently, the FSRS does not provide any notifications when the federal agency uploads the contract, which would allow the City to report against the associated contract. In the absence of this notification, the CDPH Contracts Team maintains a contract status spreadsheet that documents milestones related to the contracting process. CDPH will add a grant number field next to the FFATA data. Having the grant number adjacent to the FFATA data would inform the Contract Administrator of the specific grant number that needs to be entered and allow for the timely FSRS submission compliant with 2 CFR Part 170. John Pfeiffer, Contracts Administrator, in the DPH will be responsible for ensuring that the corrective action plan for DPH is implemented by January 1, 2022.

About Reporting →
2020-004
Reporting

FINDING 2020-004 CFDA No. 16.922 Equitable Sharing Program Federal Agency U.S. Department of Justice Pass-through Agency Not applicable Award Numbers / Years N/A / 2020 City Department Chicago Police Department (CPD) Criteria: Per guidance provided in the Guide to Equitable Sharing for State, Local, and Tribal Law Enforcement Agencies, the Equitable Sharing Annual Certification report is to be submitted no later than 2 months after the grantee?s fiscal year-end. Condition/Context: CPD did not submit its Equitable Sharing Annual Certification (ESAC) report by the 2 month deadline (March 1) after the City?s fiscal year-end. Effect: CPD was out of compliance with the Equitable Sharing program?s reporting requirements until the ESAC report was submitted on May 21, 2021, the date the report was submitted. Questioned Costs: None noted Cause: The ESAC report was submitted late because CPD was waiting for the U.S. Department of Justice to complete follow up concerning a program review that was in process. Recommendation: We recommend that CPD review its current process for preparing, approving and submitting its ESAC report and implement procedures to ensure that the ESAC report is submitted within 2 months after the City?s fiscal year end (March 1 of each year). Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

FINDING 2020-004 CFDA No. 16.922 Equitable Sharing Program Federal Agency U.S. Department of Justice Pass-through Agency Not applicable Award Numbers / Years N/A / 2020 City Department Chicago Police Department (CPD) Criteria: Per guidance provided in the Guide to Equitable Sharing for State, Local, and Tribal Law Enforcement Agencies, the Equitable Sharing Annual Certification report is to be submitted no later than 2 months after the grantee?s fiscal year-end. Condition/Context: CPD did not submit its Equitable Sharing Annual Certification (ESAC) report by the 2 month deadline (March 1) after the City?s fiscal year-end. Effect: CPD was out of compliance with the Equitable Sharing program?s reporting requirements until the ESAC report was submitted on May 21, 2021, the date the report was submitted. Questioned Costs: None noted Cause: The ESAC report was submitted late because CPD was waiting for the U.S. Department of Justice to complete follow up concerning a program review that was in process. Recommendation: We recommend that CPD review its current process for preparing, approving and submitting its ESAC report and implement procedures to ensure that the ESAC report is submitted within 2 months after the City?s fiscal year end (March 1 of each year). Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan.

Corrective Action Plan

FINDING 2020-004 The COVID-19 pandemic presented unprecedented challenges for the city throughout fiscal year 2020 and into 2021. Chicago departments adjusted work schedules, had many staff teleworking, had staff out on medical leave and many tasks that were delayed because of the pandemic were coming due simultaneously. These reasons collectively attributed to unanticipated delays to the submission of the ESAC report. The process for ESAC information gathering, reviews and signatures experienced delays with many of the staff working remotely and accessing information electronically, all simultaneous to addressing ongoing COVID-19 requests/setbacks. The annual ESAC report is compiled by the Managing Deputy Director of Administration of the Office of Public Safety Administration (OPSA) on behalf of the Chicago Police Department (CPD). To ensure future submissions are submitted timely, the OPSA will review requirements prior to the close of the fiscal year, disseminate action plans to all necessary parties prior to the end of the year and conduct more aggressive follow-up within the first 2 months of the new year. One month before the current budget fiscal year ends, the OPSA Managing Deputy Director of Administration will instruct OPSA Finance staff to begin the reconciliation of revenues and expenditures of the Equitable Sharing Program, and to ensure expenditures are appropriately categorized as defined in the Equitable Sharing Certification guidelines. The OPSA Finance staff will also prepare memorandums requesting additional information needed to complete the ESAC to each party responsible, all with a due date of mid-January of the following year. The memos will be addressed to: ? CPD General Counsel of Office of Legal Affairs requesting the Civil Rights cases be obtained from the City of Chicago Department of Law. ? CPD Bureau of Counterterrorism seeking any non-cash equipment/items received, verifying any transfers To/From other participating law enforcement agencies, and ensuring the proceeds from the sales of any non-cash equipment/items sold are deposited back into the Equitable Sharing Funds. ? The City of Chicago Department of Finance (Comptroller) requesting the interest and investment income earned through December 31st, the Single Audit Information, and the jurisdiction finance contact information. In January of the following year, the OPSA Finance staff will complete the reconciliation of the revenues and expenditures through December 31st and enter the revenues and expenditures and the responses received from CPD into the eShare Portal to complete and print the draft ESAC by the end of January. This will allow one month for all reviews to be conducted. Once the ESAC reviews are complete, and the ESAC is ready for signature, the OPSA Managing Deputy Director of Administration will prepare a memo addressed to the CPD Superintendent to accompany the final ESAC for signature. CPD Superintendent will sign as the Agency Head and OPSA will then forward the ESAC to the Chicago Office of Budget and Management (OBM) Budget Director. The Budget Director will meet with the Mayor?s Chief of Staff for review and obtain Chief of Staff signature as the Governing Body Head. The Budget Director will return the fully executed ESAC to OPSA, and OPSA will forward to the CPD Chief of Bureau of Counterterrorism, who will have a member of his/her staff with eShare Administrator rights review the fully signed ESAC, enter the electronic signatures and dates for the Agency Head and the Governing Body in the Share portal, and then submit the ESAC by the required deadline. The fully executed ESAC will be returned to OPSA for record retention.

About Reporting →

FY 2019-12-31

FAC accepted this audit on July 30, 2020 — management decision was due January 30, 2021.

2019-001
Cost Allowability

FINDING 2019-001 CFDA Nos. 93.069 Public Health Emergency Preparedness 93.940 HIV Prevention Activities ? Health Department Based Federal Agency U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Pass-through Agency Not applicable Award Numbers / Years NU90TP921901, NU90TP922033, NU62PS924560 / 2019, 2020 City Department Department of Public Health Criteria: Per guidance provided in 2 CFR part 200.430, charges to federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: 1) Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated; 2) Be incorporated into the official records of the non-federal entity; and 3) Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non-federal entity, not exceeding 100% of compensated activities. Condition/Context: For these federal programs, the department supervisors approve time of employees. There were three instances out of forty payroll transactions sampled for CFDA No. 93.940 and one instance out of forty payroll transactions sampled for CFDA No. 93.069 where an employee was charged to an award but the time was not properly approved by a supervisor. The samples were not statistically valid. Effect: The department could charge invalid time to relevant awards if proper approvals do not take place. Questioned Costs: None noted Cause: Though in 95% of the instances tested the department's control for approving employee was applied, in 5%, or four instances, controls were not applied as designed due to transition in the supervisory role. Recommendation: We recommend the department implement procedures to ensure the controls in place are properly completed prior to finalization of payroll. Views of Responsible Officials: Corrective Action: Quarterly, beginning with the 3rd quarter of CY2020, the Chicago Department of Public Health (CDPH) Finance Deputy Commissioner, or designee, will send the Supervisor Approval Rating reports to CDPH Personnel Activity Reporting (PAR) Liaisons, Deputy Commissioners and Commissioner. The report will detail approval ratings by supervisors that are less than 100%. Deputy Commissioners and the Commissioner, as applicable, will work directly with the identified supervisor and PAR Liaisons to have time approved within 5 business days. If time is not approved, and assuming no extenuating circumstances agreed upon by the CDPH Finance Deputy Commissioner, the supervisor will receive verbal counseling. If time is not approved then within 2 business days after receiving verbal counseling, the supervisor will receive next level of discipline. Further, CDPH will work with OBM to schedule training on the PAR system. Anticipated Completion Date: September 30, 2020 Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Tonya Tucker, Deputy Commissioner

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

FINDING 2019-001 CFDA Nos. 93.069 Public Health Emergency Preparedness 93.940 HIV Prevention Activities ? Health Department Based Federal Agency U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Pass-through Agency Not applicable Award Numbers / Years NU90TP921901, NU90TP922033, NU62PS924560 / 2019, 2020 City Department Department of Public Health Criteria: Per guidance provided in 2 CFR part 200.430, charges to federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: 1) Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated; 2) Be incorporated into the official records of the non-federal entity; and 3) Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non-federal entity, not exceeding 100% of compensated activities. Condition/Context: For these federal programs, the department supervisors approve time of employees. There were three instances out of forty payroll transactions sampled for CFDA No. 93.940 and one instance out of forty payroll transactions sampled for CFDA No. 93.069 where an employee was charged to an award but the time was not properly approved by a supervisor. The samples were not statistically valid. Effect: The department could charge invalid time to relevant awards if proper approvals do not take place. Questioned Costs: None noted Cause: Though in 95% of the instances tested the department's control for approving employee was applied, in 5%, or four instances, controls were not applied as designed due to transition in the supervisory role. Recommendation: We recommend the department implement procedures to ensure the controls in place are properly completed prior to finalization of payroll. Views of Responsible Officials: Corrective Action: Quarterly, beginning with the 3rd quarter of CY2020, the Chicago Department of Public Health (CDPH) Finance Deputy Commissioner, or designee, will send the Supervisor Approval Rating reports to CDPH Personnel Activity Reporting (PAR) Liaisons, Deputy Commissioners and Commissioner. The report will detail approval ratings by supervisors that are less than 100%. Deputy Commissioners and the Commissioner, as applicable, will work directly with the identified supervisor and PAR Liaisons to have time approved within 5 business days. If time is not approved, and assuming no extenuating circumstances agreed upon by the CDPH Finance Deputy Commissioner, the supervisor will receive verbal counseling. If time is not approved then within 2 business days after receiving verbal counseling, the supervisor will receive next level of discipline. Further, CDPH will work with OBM to schedule training on the PAR system. Anticipated Completion Date: September 30, 2020 Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Tonya Tucker, Deputy Commissioner

Corrective Action Plan

Corrective Action: Quarterly, beginning with the 3rd quarter of CY2020, the Chicago Department of Public Health (CDPH) Finance Deputy Commissioner, or designee, will send the Supervisor Approval Rating reports to CDPH Personnel Activity Reporting (PAR) Liaisons, Deputy Commissioners and Commissioner. The report will detail approval ratings by supervisors that are less than 100%. Deputy Commissioners and the Commissioner, as applicable, will work directly with the identified supervisor and PAR Liaisons to have time approved within 5 business days. If time is not approved, and assuming no extenuating circumstances agreed upon by the CDPH Finance Deputy Commissioner, the supervisor will receive verbal counseling. If time is not approved then within 2 business days after receiving verbal counseling, the supervisor will receive next level of discipline. Further, CDPH will work with OBM to schedule training on the PAR system. Anticipated Completion Date: September 30, 2020 Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Tonya Tucker, Deputy Commissioner

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2018-12-31

FAC accepted this audit on July 30, 2019 — management decision was due January 30, 2020.

2018-001
Special Tests & Provisions

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Special Tests and Provisions →
2018-002
Cost Allowability
QUESTIONED COSTS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →
2018-003
Equipment & Real Property

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Equipment and Real Property Management →
2018-004
Reporting

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Reporting →

FY 2017-12-31

FAC accepted this audit on July 26, 2018 — management decision was due January 26, 2019.

2017-001
Cost Allowability
QUESTIONED COSTS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →
2017-002
Cost Allowability
REPEAT

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2016-004

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2016-12-31

FAC accepted this audit on August 6, 2017 — management decision was due February 6, 2018.

2016-002
Cost Allowability
QUESTIONED COSTS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →
2016-003
Eligibility

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Eligibility →
2016-004
Cost Allowability
REPEATQUESTIONED COSTS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2015-003

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →
2016-005
Reporting

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Reporting →
2016-006
Special Tests & Provisions
REPEAT

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2015-006

About Special Tests and Provisions →

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and compliance status.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.