EIN: 356001049
UEI: SMNNZR3N6M39
Data as of August 27, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on August 12, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by February 12, 2027 (169 days from today).
What is a management decision? →FINDING 2025-001 Subject: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds - Reporting Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury Federal Program: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listings Number: 21.027 Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): 2025 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Finance Authority Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Finding: Material Weakness INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 13 CITY OF GREENSBURG SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Condition and Context Recipients are required to quarterly or annually submit Project and Expenditure reports (P&E) to the U.S. Department of the Treasury (Treasury). The reporting periods, as well as the respective due dates, are based upon type of recipient and its population, as well as the recipient's allocation amount. Information to be reported includes projects funded, expenditures, and obligations for the appropriate reporting period. The City was classified as a metropolitan city with a population below 250,000 residents that received an allocation of less than $10 million in COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF). This would classify them as a Tier 5 Recipient. As such, the P&E report covering April 1, 2024 to March 31, 2025, was required to be submitted to the Treasury by April 30, 2025. The City submitted the annual P&E report prior to the due date. However, there were no documented internal controls in place that would likely be effective in preventing, or detecting and correcting, noncompliance related to the reporting requirements. The report was prepared and submitted by one employee without an oversight, review, or approval process to ensure accuracy and completeness. The lack of internal controls was a systemic issue throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed and implemented by management of the City to ensure that P&E reports were prepared by one individual and reviewed by another individual before submission to the Treasury. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, material errors could occur and remain undetected. Material errors with the SLFRF reports could result in the loss of federal funds to the City. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 14 CITY OF GREENSBURG SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Recommendation We recommended that management of the City establish a system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures over the preparation and review of federal reports to ensure appropriate reviews, approval, and oversight are taking place. Additionally, management should develop policies and procedures to ensure that the City provides the Treasury with complete and accurate information for all reports. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴FINDING 2025-001 Subject: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds - Reporting Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury Federal Program: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listings Number: 21.027 Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): 2025 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Finance Authority Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Finding: Material Weakness INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 13 CITY OF GREENSBURG SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Condition and Context Recipients are required to quarterly or annually submit Project and Expenditure reports (P&E) to the U.S. Department of the Treasury (Treasury). The reporting periods, as well as the respective due dates, are based upon type of recipient and its population, as well as the recipient's allocation amount. Information to be reported includes projects funded, expenditures, and obligations for the appropriate reporting period. The City was classified as a metropolitan city with a population below 250,000 residents that received an allocation of less than $10 million in COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF). This would classify them as a Tier 5 Recipient. As such, the P&E report covering April 1, 2024 to March 31, 2025, was required to be submitted to the Treasury by April 30, 2025. The City submitted the annual P&E report prior to the due date. However, there were no documented internal controls in place that would likely be effective in preventing, or detecting and correcting, noncompliance related to the reporting requirements. The report was prepared and submitted by one employee without an oversight, review, or approval process to ensure accuracy and completeness. The lack of internal controls was a systemic issue throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed and implemented by management of the City to ensure that P&E reports were prepared by one individual and reviewed by another individual before submission to the Treasury. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, material errors could occur and remain undetected. Material errors with the SLFRF reports could result in the loss of federal funds to the City. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 14 CITY OF GREENSBURG SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Recommendation We recommended that management of the City establish a system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures over the preparation and review of federal reports to ensure appropriate reviews, approval, and oversight are taking place. Additionally, management should develop policies and procedures to ensure that the City provides the Treasury with complete and accurate information for all reports. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2025-001 Finding Subject: COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds - Reporting Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Amy Borns Contact Phone Number and Email Address: 812-663-8582 ext 1 & aborns@greensburg.in.gov Views of Responsible Officials: We concur with the finding. Description of Corrective Action Plan: When the SLFRF Compliance report is completed by the Clerk-Treasurer, either the Accounts Payable/Receivable Specialist or the Personnel Administrator will double check it and sign off (or send an email) concurring with the report. Anticipated Completion Date: This will be completed no later than April 30, 2027.
FAC accepted this audit on September 30, 2024 — management decision was due March 30, 2025.
An effective internal control system was not in place at the City in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Special Tests and Provisions – Wage Rate Requirements compliance requirements. The City did not obtain the weekly payroll reports certifications from a construction company and its subcontractors for a building project. Cause: The City's management had not developed a system of internal controls to ensure compliance with the compliance requirements listed above. Effect: The failure to design and implement an effective internal control system enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Special Tests and Provisions – Wage Rate Requirements compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: There were two construction contracts funded by the Airport Improvement Program (AIP) with expenditures totaling $4,984,949 during the audit period and subject to federal Davis Bacon wage rate requirements. The first contract tested had expenditures of $4,811,862 over 47 planned construction weeks during the audit period. There were no exceptions to the wage rate testing performed for this contract. The second contract had expenditures of $173,087 over 14 planning construction weeks during the audit period. For this contract, the City’s internal control to collect the weekly payroll reports certifications from the construction company and its subcontractors, as applicable, did not work as designed. The testing noted there was only one certified payroll collected over the fourteen week planned work period. Therefore, insufficient review was performed by management to ensure that pay rates complied with the federal wage rate requirements. These construction payments for this project represented approximately 2.2% of the Airport Improvement Program expenditures for the audit period. Identification as a repeat finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the City revise their process to ensure the required weekly payroll report certifications are collected and reviewed by management to ensure compliance with the federal wage rate requirements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Finding 2023-003 Information on the federal program: Subject: Airport Improvement Program, COVID-19 – Airports Program, and Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act Programs – Special Tests and Provisions - Wage Rate Requirements Federal Agency: Department of Transportation Federal Program: Airport Improvement Program, COVID-19 – Airports Program, and Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act Programs Assistance Listing Number: 20.106 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): AIP16 Compliance Requirement: Special Tests and Provisions - Wage Rate Requirements Audit Findings: Significant Deficiency Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 29 CFR 5.5 states in part: a. The Agency head shall cause or require the contracting officer to insert in full in any contract in excess of $2,000 which is entered into for the actual construction, alteration and/or repair, including painting and decorating, of a public building or public work, or building or work financed in whole or in part from Federal funds or in accordance with guarantees of a Federal agency or financed from funds obtained by pledge of any contract of a Federal agency to make a loan, grant or annual contribution (except where a different meaning is expressly indicated), and which is subject to the labor standards provisions of any of the acts listed in §5.1, the following clauses… (1) Minimum wages. (i) All laborers and mechanics employed or working upon the site of the work (or under the United States Housing Act of 1937 or under the Housing Act of 1949 in the construction or development of the project), will be paid unconditionally and not less often than once a week, and without subsequent deduction or rebate on any account (except such payroll deductions as are permitted by regulations issued by the Secretary of Labor under the Copeland Act (29 CFR part 3)), the full amount of wages and bona fide fringe benefits (or cash equivalents thereof) due at time of payment computed at rates not less than those contained in the wage determination of the Secretary of Labor which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, regardless of any contractual relationship which may be alleged to exist between the contractor and such laborers and mechanics… (3)(ii)(A) The contractor shall submit weekly for each week in which any contract work is performed a copy of all payrolls to the (write in name of appropriate federal agency) if the agency is a party to the contract, but if the agency is not such a party, the contractor will submit the payrolls to the applicant, sponsor, or owner, as the case may be, for transmission to the (write in name of agency). 2 CFR 200 Appendix II states in part: In addition to other provisions required by the Federal agency or non-Federal entity; all contracts made by the non-Federal entity under the Federal award must contain provisions covering the following, as applicable. . . . (D) Davis-Bacon Act, as amended (40 U.S.C. 3141-3148). When required by Federal program legislation, all prime construction contracts in excess of $2,000 awarded by non-Federal entities must include a provision for compliance with the Davis-Bacon Act (40 U.S.C. 3141-3144, and 3146-3148) as supplemented by Department of Labor regulations (29 CFR Part 5, “Labor Standards Provisions Applicable to Contracts Covering Federally Financed and Assisted Construction”). In accordance with the statute, contractors must be required to pay wages to laborers and mechanics at a rate not less than the prevailing wages specified in a wage determination made by the Secretary of Labor. In addition, contractors must be required to pay wages not less than once a week.. . .” Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the City in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Special Tests and Provisions – Wage Rate Requirements compliance requirements. The City did not obtain the weekly payroll reports certifications from a construction company and its subcontractors for a building project. Cause: The City's management had not developed a system of internal controls to ensure compliance with the compliance requirements listed above. Effect: The failure to design and implement an effective internal control system enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Special Tests and Provisions – Wage Rate Requirements compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: There were two construction contracts funded by the Airport Improvement Program (AIP) with expenditures totaling $4,984,949 during the audit period and subject to federal Davis Bacon wage rate requirements. The first contract tested had expenditures of $4,811,862 over 47 planned construction weeks during the audit period. There were no exceptions to the wage rate testing performed for this contract. The second contract had expenditures of $173,087 over 14 planning construction weeks during the audit period. For this contract, the City’s internal control to collect the weekly payroll reports certifications from the construction company and its subcontractors, as applicable, did not work as designed. The testing noted there was only one certified payroll collected over the fourteen week planned work period. Therefore, insufficient review was performed by management to ensure that pay rates complied with the federal wage rate requirements. These construction payments for this project represented approximately 2.2% of the Airport Improvement Program expenditures for the audit period. Identification as a repeat finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the City revise their process to ensure the required weekly payroll report certifications are collected and reviewed by management to ensure compliance with the federal wage rate requirements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
Management of the City will work with their contractors, both the construction contractors and the engineering firms hired to oversee and monitor the construction projects, to ensure they understand the wage rate requirements that must be followed for federally funded construction projects. The City will implement a periodic monitoring program where the City verifies the contracted engineering or compliance vendors are adhering to the City’s contractual requirements such as obtaining the weekly certified payrolls.
The City contracted a vendor utilizing federal funds without performing a formal bid process for projects exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold of $150,000 no did the City provide documentation supporting a noncompetitive procurement. There was available history of the procurement process, including a lack of documented City Council approval for the contract. The contract entered into also did not include the required Buy America Build America Provisions. Cause: The City’s management had not developed a system of internal controls to ensure compliance with the compliance requirements listed above. Also, the City does not have written Procurement Policies that comply with the Federal Uniform Guidance requirements for non-Federal entities. The City’s current policy does not address the following requirements: • Written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting. • Written standards for solicitations to foster full and open competition. • Micro-purchase threshold of $10,000 (listed at $25k) • Written standards for solicitations requiring a formal bid process • Written standards to rationalize limited competition purchases • Written standards to maintain historical documentation of the procurement process Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the City at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: The City entered into three contracts funded by the Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF) grant during the audit period. Two of those contracts were selected for testing and the City was unable to provide any procurement history. Upon inquiry of the City on their purchasing policies and procedures, it was verified the City does not have procurement policies for purchases that conform to the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. There were $237,044 in expenditures incurred on the contracts tested in the current fiscal year. Identification as a repeat finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend that management of the City establish a proper system of internal controls and develop and implement procurement policies and procedures that adheres of the procurement requirements for purchases with federal awards as required by the 2 CFR 200 Uniform Guidance. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴FINDING 2023-004 Information on the federal program: Subject: COVID-19 – Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds – Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Treasury Federal Program: COVID 19 – Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY2022 Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Finding: Material Weakness, Qualified Opinion Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR section 200.318 states in part: (a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. (b) Non-Federal entities must maintain oversight to ensure that contractors perform in accordance with the terms, conditions, and specifications of their contracts or purchase orders… Section III – Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (Continued) Finding 2023-003 (Continued) (h) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. 2 CFR section 200.320 states in part: (b) Formal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal financial assistance award exceeds the SAT, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods require following documented procedures. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a non-competitive procurement can be used in accordance with § 200.319 or paragraph (c) of this section. The following formal methods of procurement are used for procurement of property or services above the simplified acquisition threshold or a value below the simplified acquisition threshold the non-Federal entity determines to be appropriate:… (c) Noncompetitive procurement. There are specific circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. Noncompetitive procurement can only be awarded if one or more of the following circumstances apply: (1) The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold (see paragraph (a)(1) of this section); (2) The item is available only from a single source; (3) The public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from publicizing a competitive solicitation; (4) The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity expressly authorizes a noncompetitive procurement in response to a written request from the non-Federal entity; or (5) After solicitation of a number of sources, competition is determined inadequate. Condition: The City contracted a vendor utilizing federal funds without performing a formal bid process for projects exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold of $150,000 no did the City provide documentation supporting a noncompetitive procurement. There was available history of the procurement process, including a lack of documented City Council approval for the contract. The contract entered into also did not include the required Buy America Build America Provisions. Cause: The City’s management had not developed a system of internal controls to ensure compliance with the compliance requirements listed above. Also, the City does not have written Procurement Policies that comply with the Federal Uniform Guidance requirements for non-Federal entities. The City’s current policy does not address the following requirements: • Written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting. • Written standards for solicitations to foster full and open competition. • Micro-purchase threshold of $10,000 (listed at $25k) • Written standards for solicitations requiring a formal bid process • Written standards to rationalize limited competition purchases • Written standards to maintain historical documentation of the procurement process Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the City at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: The City entered into three contracts funded by the Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF) grant during the audit period. Two of those contracts were selected for testing and the City was unable to provide any procurement history. Upon inquiry of the City on their purchasing policies and procedures, it was verified the City does not have procurement policies for purchases that conform to the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. There were $237,044 in expenditures incurred on the contracts tested in the current fiscal year. Identification as a repeat finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend that management of the City establish a proper system of internal controls and develop and implement procurement policies and procedures that adheres of the procurement requirements for purchases with federal awards as required by the 2 CFR 200 Uniform Guidance. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
Management of the City will work to adopt a formal procurement policy that is in compliance with Federal Uniform Guidance and State requirements. The City will also assign a federal procurement leader that will help determine requirements for federal versus nonfederal awards as well as ensuring the City’s new procurement policy is followed.
FAC accepted this audit on September 12, 2019 — management decision was due March 12, 2020.
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.
Start monitoring →© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.