EIN: 356000153
UEI: XN4AQ48CZV74
Data as of August 21, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on September 24, 2024. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by March 24, 2025, which was (515 days ago).
What is a management decision? →FINDING 2023-004 Subject: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds - Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury Federal Program: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listings Number: 21.027 Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): FY 2023 Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with the State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF) award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the Excluded Parties List System (EPLS), collecting a certification from that person, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. The County did not have any policies or procedures in place related to the suspension and debarment requirements. A population of 12 covered transactions, totaling $5,894,363, that equaled or exceeded $25,000 paid from SLFRF funds were identified. Four of the transactions, totaling $4,963,562, were selected for testing. For each of the four transactions, the County did not verify the vendor's suspension or debarment status prior to payment due to the County not having polices or procedures in place to verify that contractors were neither suspended nor debarred, or otherwise excluded or disqualified, from participating in federal assistance programs or activities. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 21 HARRISON COUNTY SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 31 CFR 19.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking the EPLS; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person if allowed by this rule; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause The County was unable to provide documentation to demonstrate it had policies or procedures in place to verify suspension and debarment status for covered transactions it intends to pay with federal funds. The County was unable to provide documentation to demonstrate the County had properly verified that contractors were neither suspended nor debarred, or otherwise excluded or disqualified, from participating in federal assistance programs or activities. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the County cannot ensure that contractors paid with federal funds are eligible to participate in federal programs. Any program funds the County used to pay contractors that have been suspended or debarred would be unallowable, and the funding agency could potentially recover them. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the County. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 22 HARRISON COUNTY SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Recommendation We recommended that management of the County strengthen its system of internal controls to ensure that all contractors that are paid $25,000 or more, all or in part with federal funds, are not suspended or debarred from participating in federal programs before entering into contracts. We also recommended strengthening its policies and procedures to ensure appropriate supporting documentation for federal programs is retained to be presented for audit. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2023-004 Finding Subject: COVID-19 – Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds - Suspension and Debarment Summary of Finding: Finding 2023-004 revealed that the County did not have policies or procedures in place to verify the suspension or debarment status of contractors paid with federal funds under the State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF) program. For the four transactions tested, totaling $4,963,562, the County did not verify the suspension or debarment status of vendors before making payments. This lack of controls and noncompliance with federal requirements was a systemic issue during the audit period. Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Chad Shireman Contact Phone Number and Email Address: 812-738-8241; cshireman@harrisoncounty.in.gov Views of Responsible Officials: We concur with the finding. Description of Corrective Action Plan: The County Auditor's office acknowledges the need for proper internal controls related to suspension and debarment checks for contractors receiving $25,000 or more in federal funds. The County will create and adopt a formal policy requiring verification of the suspension and debarment status of all contractors involved in transactions exceeding $25,000 before any contract is awarded or payment is made and require vendors to registered with SAM.gov . The policy will require checks to be performed using the Excluded Parties List System (EPLS), as mandated by federal regulations, and verification to be documented in each contract file. County staff involved in procurement and contracting will undergo training on federal compliance requirements, including the verification of suspension and debarment status for covered transactions under the SLFRF and other federal programs. A system of documentation and record retention will be established to ensure that all suspension and debarment verifications are properly recorded and maintained for audit purposes. A regular monitoring process will be implemented to review compliance with suspension and debarment requirements. Anticipated Completion Date: December 31, 2024
FINDING 2023-005 Subject: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds - Reporting Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury Federal Program: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listings Number: 21.027 Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): FY 2023 Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2022-003. Condition and Context Recipients are required to submit quarterly or annually Project and Expenditure (P&E) reports to the U.S. Department of the Treasury (Treasury). The reporting periods, as well as the respective due dates, are based upon type of recipient and its population, as well as recipient's allocation amount. Information to be reported includes projects funded, expenditures, and contracts for the appropriate reporting period. The County was classified as a county with a population below 250,000 residents that received an allocation of less than $10 million in COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF). As such, the initial P&E report, covering the period from March 3, 2021 to March 31, 2022, was required to be submitted to the Treasury by April 30, 2022. The subsequent annual reports are to cover one calendar year and must be submitted to the Treasury by April 30 each year. The County submitted one annual P&E report during the audit period; however, the internal controls in place were not effective to prevent, or detect and correct, errors. As a result, errors in reporting were identified. The current period obligations and cumulative obligations were incorrectly reported. The County was unable to provide supporting documentation for current period and cumulative obligations as reported. The lack of effective internal controls and noncompliance were isolated to the one P&E report due during the audit period. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 23 HARRISON COUNTY SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Compliance and Reporting Guidance, page 10, states in part: ". . . 10. Reporting. All recipients of federal funds must complete financial, performance, and compliance reporting as required and outlined in Part 2 of this guidance. Expenditures may be reported on a cash or accrual basis, as long as the methodology is disclosed and consistently applied. Reporting must be consistent with the definition of expenditures pursuant to 2 CFR 200.1. Your organization should appropriately maintain accounting records for compiling and reporting accurate, compliant financial data, in accordance with appropriate accounting standards and principles. . . ." 31 CFR 35.4(c) states in part: "Reporting and requests for other information. During the period of performance, recipients shall provide to the Secretary periodic reports providing detailed accounting of the uses of funds, . . ." Cause The County's oversight process for filing the P&E report for the period of April 1, 2022 to March 31, 2023, did not detect errors. Due to the timing of the P&E report submission and prior audit completion, corrective actions from the previous year's finding, finding number 2022-003, could not be implemented to correct noncompliance. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, including policies and procedures the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As such, the County did not report cumulative obligations and current period obligations properly when filing the P&E report for the period April 1, 2022 to March 31, 2023. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the County. In addition, not meeting the SLFRF reporting requirements increases the likelihood that the public and the Treasury will not have access to transparent and accurate information regarding expenditures of federal awards. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 24 HARRISON COUNTY SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Recommendation We recommended that management of the County design and implement a proper system of internal controls to provide for a segregation of duties in the preparation and review of federal reports to ensure appropriate reviews, approvals, and oversight are taking place. We also recommended the development of policies and procedures to ensure the County provides the Treasury with complete and accurate information for the P&E report. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2023-005 Finding Subject: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds – Reporting Summary of Finding: Finding 2023-005 found that the County did not have an effective system of internal controls in place to ensure accurate and complete reporting of Project and Expenditure (P&E) reports for the Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF). The County was unable to provide supporting documentation for current period and cumulative obligations, resulting in reporting errors. This issue was isolated to the one annual P&E report submitted during the audit period. Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Chad Shireman Contact Phone Number and Email Address: 812-738-8241; cshireman@harrisoncounty.in.gov Views of Responsible Officials: We concur with the finding. Description of Corrective Action Plan: The County Auditor's office acknowledges the need for strengthened internal controls and improved processes to ensure compliance with reporting requirements for federal awards. A system of internal controls will be designed and implemented to ensure segregation of duties in the preparation, review, and submission of federal reports. This will involve designating different personnel for the preparation and review of P&E reports to ensure accuracy and thorough oversight before submission. Staff involved in federal reporting will receive training on SLFRF compliance and reporting requirements, including proper procedures for documenting obligations and reporting them accurately. The County will review its procedures to ensure compliance with federal reporting requirements periodically. This will help identify any potential issues in a timely manner and allow for immediate corrective action if needed. In addition, regular reviews will verify that corrective actions from prior audits are fully implemented and maintained. Anticipated Completion Date: December 31, 2024
2022-003
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on August 23, 2023. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by February 23, 2024, which was (910 days ago).
What is a management decision? →FINDING 2022-003 Subject: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds - Reporting Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury Federal Program: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listings Number: 21.027 Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): FY 2022 Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2021-003. Condition and Context The County had not properly designed a system of internal controls that would be effective in preventing, or detecting and correcting, noncompliance. Recipients are required to submit quarterly or annually Project and Expenditure (P&E) reports to the U.S. Department of the Treasury (Treasury). The reporting periods, as well as the respective due dates, are based upon type of recipient and its population, as well as recipient's allocation amount. Information to be reported includes projects funded, expenditures, and contracts for the appropriate reporting period. The County was classified as a Tier 5 (Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds) recipient. As such, the initial P&E report, covering from March 3, 2021 to March 31, 2022, was required to be submitted to the Treasury by April 30, 2022. The subsequent annual reports were to cover one calendar year and must be submitted to the Treasury by April 30. The County submitted one annual P&E report during the audit period. The report was prepared by the County Auditor and reviewed and certified by a designated County Commissioner; however, the review process in place was not effective and did not prevent or detect and correct errors. As a result, $0 was reported as the current expenditures and current obligations, when in fact there were current expenditures and current obligations of $639,824. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Compliance and Reporting Guidance, page 10, states in part: ". . . 10. Reporting. All recipients of federal funds must complete financial, performance, and compliance reporting as required and outlined in Part 2 of this guidance. Expenditures may be reported on a cash or accrual basis, as long as the methodology is disclosed and consistently applied. Reporting must be consistent with the definition of expenditures pursuant to 2 CFR 200.1. Your organization should appropriately maintain accounting records for compiling and reporting accurate, compliance financial data, in accordance with appropriate accounting standards and principles. . . ." 31 CFR 35.4(c) states in part: "Reporting and requests for other information. During the period of performance, recipients shall provide to the Secretary periodic reports providing accounting of the uses of funds, . . ." Cause A proper system of internal controls over the P&E report was not designed by management of the County. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the County's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the County. In addition, not meeting the State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds reporting requirements increases the likelihood that the public will not have access to transparent and accurate information regarding expenditures of federal awards. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the County design and implement a proper system of internal controls that would ensure appropriate reviews, approvals, and oversight are taking place. Additionally, management should develop policies and procedures to ensure that the County provides the Treasury with complete and accurate information for the P&E report. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2022-003 Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Chad Shireman Contact Phone Number: 812-738-8241 Views of Responsible Official: We concur with the finding. Description of Corrective Action Plan: The county will ensure that internal controls that are currently in place will be modified in order to be effective in preventing, detecting and correcting errors. This will include making sure the county auditor and designated county commissioner are aware of all reporting deadlines and reporting periods covered. Once the county auditor enters expenditure and obligation information, the designated county commissioner will review the data and submit the necessary report(s). Anticipated Completion Date: This will be completed by September 30, 2023, allowing the county auditor to update the designated county commissioner in the Department of the Treasury?s system and inform him of all upcoming report deadlines. This will ensure the effectiveness of existing internal controls.
2021-003
FINDING 2022-004 Subject: Formula Grants for Rural Areas and Tribal Transit Program - Subrecipient Monitoring Federal Agency: Department of Transportation Federal Programs: COVID-19 - Formula Grants for Rural Areas and Tribal Transit Program, Formula Grants for Rural Areas and Tribal Transit Program Assistance Listings Number: 20.509 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): EDS#A249-20-G20032, EDS#A249-22-G210088, EDS#A249-22-G210124 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Transportation Compliance Requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context The County had not properly designed or implemented a system of internal controls, which would include appropriate segregation of duties, that would likely be effective in preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance related to the Formula Grants for Rural Areas and Tribal Transit Program funds (Transit program) passed through to a subrecipient. The County received and passed through to a subrecipient $664,071 in Transit program funds. The County is to clearly identify the award and applicable requirements to the subrecipient, evaluate the risk of noncompliance related to the subrecipient to determine appropriate monitoring of the subaward, and monitor the activities of the subrecipient to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, complies with the terms and conditions of the subaward, and achieves performance goals. As part of managing the award, the County is to evaluate the subrecipients risk of noncompliance to determine the extent of monitoring. Such factors to consider would include the subrecipients prior experience with the award or similar awards, results of previous audits, any personnel or system changes at the subrecipient, and the extent and results of federal reviews. Based on the results of the County's risk of noncompliance evaluation, the extent of monitoring can be determined. Monitoring activities include, but are not limited to, reviewing financial and performance reports, ensuring audits are obtained as required, follow-up to ensure appropriate action was taken on deficiencies identified during an audit, issuing management decisions for applicable findings related to the federal award, and ensuring audit findings related to the subaward are resolved. The County did not have any policies or procedures in place to evaluate the subrecipient's risk of noncompliance or to monitor the activity of the subrecipient. Per inquiry of the County, it was determined an evaluation of the risk of noncompliance for the subrecipient was not completed, nor did the subrecipient's files support any such evaluation. In addition, while the subrecipient provided reimbursement requests, the requests did not include sufficient evidence for the County to ascertain if the subrecipient was complying with the grant requirements. The County also did not request or review the subrecipient's audit or monitoring reports to identify any potential noncompliance, determine if management decisions were needed, or if any issues identified were properly resolved. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.332 Requirements for pass-through entities. (Revised Uniform Guidance) states in part: "All pass-through entities must: . . . (b) Evaluate each subrecipient's risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring described in paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section, which may include consideration of such factors as: (1) The subrecipient's prior experience with the same or similar subawards; (2) The results of previous audits including whether or not the subrecipient receives a Single Audit in accordance with Subpart F of this part, and the extent to which the same or similar subaward has been audited as a major program; (3) Whether the subrecipient has new personnel or new or substantially changed systems; and (4) The extent and results of Federal awarding agency monitoring (e.g., if the subrecipient also receives Federal awards directly from a Federal awarding agency). (c) Consider imposing specific subaward conditions upon a subrecipient if appropriate as described in ? 200.208. (d) Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: (1) Reviewing financial and performance reports required by the pass-through entity. (2) Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity detected through audits, on-site reviews, and written confirmation from the subrecipient, highlighting the status of actions planned or taken to address Single Audit Findings related to the particular subaward. (3) Issuing a management decision for applicable audit findings pertaining to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity as required by ? 200.521. (4) The pass-through entity is responsible for resolving audit findings specifically related to the subaward and not responsible for resolving cross-cutting findings. If a subrecipient has a current Single Audit report posted in the Federal Audit Clearinghouse and has not otherwise been excluded from receipt of Federal funding (e.g., has been debarred or suspended), the pass-through entity may rely on the subrecipient's cognizant audit agency or cognizant oversight agency to perform audit follow-up and make management decisions related to cross-cutting findings in accordance with section ? 200.513(a)(3)(vii). Such reliance does not eliminate the responsibility of the pass-through entity to issue subawards that conform to agency and award-specific requirements, to manage risk through ongoing subaward monitoring, and to monitor the status of the findings that are specifically related to the subaward. Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the County. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the County's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, the County did not properly evaluate the subrecipients risk of noncompliance or adequately monitor the subrecipient. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the County. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the County implement a proper system of internal controls, including segregation of duties, to evaluate the subrecipients risk of noncompliance and adequately monitor the subrecipient. Additionally, policies and procedures should be implemented to ensure appropriate reviews, approvals, and oversight are taking place, as needed, to evaluate and monitor its subrecipient. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2022-004 Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Chad Shireman Contact Phone Number: 812-738-8241 Views of Responsible Official: We concur with the finding. Description of Corrective Action Plan: The county will be retaining and periodically reviewing the grant application and award to stay current on applicable requirements of the subrecipient in order to ensure compliance. Lines of communication with the subrecipient will be established and maintained to better monitor activities, ensuring that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, complies with the terms and conditions of the subaward and achieves performance goals. Policies and procedures will be adopted and implemented to allow the county to evaluate the subrecipient?s risk of noncompliance. The county will request supporting documentation from the subrecipient when reimbursement requests are made, and this process will be documented in order to provide evidence that it is taking place. Anticipated Completion Date: The anticipated completion date will be December 31, 2023. This will allow the county and the subrecipient to work together to create the necessary policies and procedures. Once created, the remainder of the year will be used to implement them, allowing the county to evaluate all activities for the entire 2023 audit period that will be under review by SBOA in 2024.
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on August 31, 2022. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by March 3, 2023, which was (1267 days ago).
What is a management decision? →FINDING 2021-003 Subject: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds - Reporting Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury Federal Program: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listings Number: 21.027 Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): Harrison County Ordinance#2021 Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Finding: Material Weakness Condition and Context The County had not established internal controls over the Interim Report submitted to the Department of the Treasury. The County Auditor completed and submitted the report without a proper system of review or oversight to ensure the accuracy of the report. The lack of internal controls was isolated to the Interim Report. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." Cause Management had not established a system of internal control that would have ensured compliance with the Reporting compliance requirement. Effect The failure to establish an effective system of internal could have enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Questioned Costs No questioned costs were identified. Recommendation We recommended that the County's management establish effective internal controls to ensure compliance with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2021-003 Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Chad Shireman Contact Phone Number: 812-738-8241 Views of Responsible Official: We concur with the finding. Description of Corrective Action Plan: The county will establish and maintain internal control systems that allow it to ensure compliance with the grant agreement and the reporting compliance requirement. The county auditor will enter all relevant reporting information and the president of the board of county commissioners will review all data prior to submission. This oversight will be documented, providing evidence that they occurred and allowing them to be further evaluated for effectiveness. Anticipated Completion Date: Progress for these changes will be immediate. Elected officials and county employees will be identified and roles will be assigned for the newly established internal controls. These changes will be in place prior to the next round of grant disbursements and reporting deadlines.
FINDING 2021-004 Subject: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury Federal Program: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listings Number: 21.027 Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): Harrison County Ordinance#2021 Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context An effective system of internal control was not in place at the County to ensure compliance with requirements related to the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Procurement The County did not have documented procurement procedures or policies as required. In addition, although conflicts of interest were addressed in the County's Personnel Policies Handbook, it did not include standards of conduct covering conflicts of interest or to govern the actions of its employees engaged in selection, award and administration of contracts supported by federal awards. Suspension and Debarment The County verified that vendors with contracts over $25,000 were not excluded or disqualified from participation in federal award programs; however, there were no internal controls, such as a review or oversight of the verification process. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318 states in part: (a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in ?? 200.317 through 200.327. . . . (c)(1) The non-Federal entity must maintain written standards of conduct covering conflicts of interest and governing the actions of its employees engaged in the selection, award and administration of contracts. . . ." Cause Management had not designed, nor implemented a system of internal control that would have ensured compliance with the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Effect The failure to design or implement an effective internal control system enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funding to the County. Questioned Costs No questioned costs were identified. Recommendation We recommended that the County's management establish a system of internal control to ensure compliance with the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2021-004 Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Chad Shireman Contact Phone Number: 812-738-8241 Views of Responsible Official: We concur with the finding. Description of Corrective Action Plan: The county will contract with consultants that are qualified to assist in the creation of a written purchasing policy, as well as conflicts of interest in regards to contracts supported by federal awards. Although the county ensures that subgrantees or contracted vendors were not excluded or disqualified from participation in federal award programs, no internal controls were in place. Internal controls will be introduced and documentation will be completed for supporting documentation. Anticipated Completion Date: After the exit conference is completed and all requirements are known, the county will begin seeking contracts with consultants to draft the necessary policies to be in compliance with requirements. The county auditor?s office will begin implementing internal controls immediately. All changes are anticipated to be completed by December 31, 2022.
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on March 14, 2022. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by September 14, 2022, which was (1437 days ago).
What is a management decision? →FINDING 2019-003 Subject: Child Support Enforcement - Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Federal Agency: Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program: Child Support Enforcement CFDA Number: 93.563 Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): 2019 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Child Services Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Finding: Material Weakness Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not in place at the County to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirement. The County had implemented controls, but they were not effective. The cost allocation plan prepared by a third-party vendor, and reviewed and approved by the County Auditor, did not detect an immaterial overstatement of expenses. The lack of effective internal controls was a systemic issue that affected the amount of indirect cost reimbursement claimed for the entire audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." Cause Management did not develop a system of internal controls to ensure compliance with the grant agreement and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirement. Effect The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the County at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. A lack of segregation of duties within an internal control system could have also allowed noncompliance with compliance requirements and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the program. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the County's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure compliance with the grant agreement and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2019-003 Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Chad Shireman Contact Phone Number: 812-738-8241 Views of Responsible Official: We concur with the finding. Description of Corrective Action Plan: A third-party vendor will continue to prepare the cost allocation plan on the county?s behalf. In order to provide proper oversight, the county auditor will spend more time getting familiar with requirements related to the grant agreement. The auditor will also provide the cost allocation plan to the county clerk?s office to provide another layer of oversight from the department most familiar with the data in question. With a more thorough review of the third-party?s work, the county auditor will provide a more effective review and approval process of the information. Anticipated Completion Date: The plan will be put in place as the third-party vendor makes the completed cost allocation plan of 2020 available to the county auditor. Using prior years as a reference, it is anticipated that the county auditor will receive the plan in early August of 2021, with the aforementioned review process taking place and wrapping up by the end of August or early September of 2021.
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on August 19, 2019. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by February 19, 2020, which was (2375 days ago).
What is a management decision? →GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Monitor subrecipient audit findings and compliance status.
Start monitoring →Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.