Fresh Farm markets INC.

EIN: 352169859

UEI: NKSJKSNS72E6

Data as of August 22, 2026

Fresh Farm markets INC.4 audit years8 findings1 repeat
4
Audit Years
8
Total Findings
1
Repeat Findings

FY 2023-12-31

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on October 29, 2024. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by April 29, 2025 (480 days ago).

What is a management decision? →
2023-002
Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
REPEAT

The organization did not document procurements consistent with the standards of 2 CFR sections 200.318, 200.319, and 200.320. Cause: There are no formally approved written policies and procedures for procurement. Effect or Potential Effect: The cost of the procurements may be disallowed. Recommendation: The organization should become familiar with the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 and establish written policies and procedures for procurement. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding and is in the process of finalizing written policies and procedures for procurement.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Criterial or Specific Requirement: Nonfederal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. Condition: The organization did not document procurements consistent with the standards of 2 CFR sections 200.318, 200.319, and 200.320. Cause: There are no formally approved written policies and procedures for procurement. Effect or Potential Effect: The cost of the procurements may be disallowed. Recommendation: The organization should become familiar with the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 and establish written policies and procedures for procurement. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding and is in the process of finalizing written policies and procedures for procurement.

Corrective Action Plan

Management agrees with the finding. Management has drafted a procurement policy, and will enact and enforce this policy by the end of 2024. This policy will be reviewed annually to ensure that any changes in laws and regulation are reflected in internal procedures.

Prior Finding References

2022-001

About Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →

FY 2022-12-31

FAC accepted this audit on September 26, 2023 — management decision was due March 26, 2024.

2022-001
Other

The Organization lacks a documented procurement policy, therefore the procurement standards required may not be implemented. Cause: FRESHFARM Markets, Inc. does not have a process for reviewing its accounting and organizational policies on a regular basis. Effect or potential effect: Costs for purchases subject to the procurement standards could be disallowed if appropriate procedures are not followed. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: The Organization should design and implement a procurement policy. This policy should be reviewed annually, or more frequently, if necessary, to ensure any changes in laws and regulations are reflected in internal procedures.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Criteria or Specific Requirement: Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) sections 200.318 through 200.236. 2 CFR section 200.318(a) indicates the non-federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in these sections. The general requirements are that the Organization maintain written standards of conduct, full and open competition, and methods of procurement to be followed including formal and informal procurement processes based on a defined threshold. Condition: The Organization lacks a documented procurement policy, therefore the procurement standards required may not be implemented. Cause: FRESHFARM Markets, Inc. does not have a process for reviewing its accounting and organizational policies on a regular basis. Effect or potential effect: Costs for purchases subject to the procurement standards could be disallowed if appropriate procedures are not followed. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: The Organization should design and implement a procurement policy. This policy should be reviewed annually, or more frequently, if necessary, to ensure any changes in laws and regulations are reflected in internal procedures.

Corrective Action Plan

Views from Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding. Management will design and implement a procurement policy which will be reviewed annually to ensure that any changes in laws and regulations are reflected in internal procedures. Contact Person: Natisha Dawson, Director of Finance and Operations. Anticipated Date of Completion: December 2023.

About Other →
2022-002
Other

Effective internal controls over reporting requirements were not established for review of Form 425. Cause: The lack of effective internal controls over reporting caused errors in the initial preparation of Form 425. Effect or Potential Effect: Improper reporting could result in the federal agency exercising additional scrutiny over activities and possible loss of funding. Repeat Finding: Yes. Recommendation: The Organization should implement controls to monitor compliance with the reporting requirements of federal awards.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Criteria or Specific Requirement: 2 CFR 200.303(c) requires the non-Federal entity to evaluate and monitor the non-Federal entity's compliance with statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of Federal awards. Condition: Effective internal controls over reporting requirements were not established for review of Form 425. Cause: The lack of effective internal controls over reporting caused errors in the initial preparation of Form 425. Effect or Potential Effect: Improper reporting could result in the federal agency exercising additional scrutiny over activities and possible loss of funding. Repeat Finding: Yes. Recommendation: The Organization should implement controls to monitor compliance with the reporting requirements of federal awards.

Corrective Action Plan

Views from Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding. Management will implement controls to monitor compliance with the reporting requirements of federal awards. Contact Person: Carrie Hildebrandt, Grants and Finance Senior Manager. Anticipated Date of Completion: September 2023.

About Other →

FY 2021-12-31

FAC accepted this audit on November 15, 2022 — management decision was due May 15, 2023.

2021-002
Cost Allowability

Federal Program: Department of Agriculture 10.561 SNAP Cluster, passed through District of Columbia Department of Health Condition and Context: Indirect costs charged to the federal grant were not supported by an appropriate and consistently applied methodology. General overhead costs exceed the amounts charged to the grant, however, allocations of indirect costs were not tracked. Criteria: 2 CFR Subpart E requires the organization to conform to allowability of cost provisions, and 2 CFR 200.303 requires the organization to establish and maintain effective controls over internal controls. Cause: The organization does not utilize a formal mechanism to allocate indirect costs charged to grants. Effect: Indirect costs could be charged improperly and could be charged to multiple grants. Recommendation: The organization should track overhead costs in a pool and perform an ongoing calculation to reclassify allowable amounts to each grant. Repeat Finding? No

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Federal Program: Department of Agriculture 10.561 SNAP Cluster, passed through District of Columbia Department of Health Condition and Context: Indirect costs charged to the federal grant were not supported by an appropriate and consistently applied methodology. General overhead costs exceed the amounts charged to the grant, however, allocations of indirect costs were not tracked. Criteria: 2 CFR Subpart E requires the organization to conform to allowability of cost provisions, and 2 CFR 200.303 requires the organization to establish and maintain effective controls over internal controls. Cause: The organization does not utilize a formal mechanism to allocate indirect costs charged to grants. Effect: Indirect costs could be charged improperly and could be charged to multiple grants. Recommendation: The organization should track overhead costs in a pool and perform an ongoing calculation to reclassify allowable amounts to each grant. Repeat Finding? No

Corrective Action Plan

Management agrees with the finding and will implement a cost pool for allowable overhead expenses to be combined then allocated to various grants.

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →
2021-003
Cost Allowability

Federal Program: Department of Health and Human Services, Improving the Health of Americans through Prevention and Management of Diabetes and Heart Disease and Stroke; 93.426, passed through District of Columbia Department of Health Condition and Context: Indirect costs charged to the federal grant were not supported by an appropriate and consistently applied methodology. General overhead costs exceed the amounts charged to the grant, however, allocations of indirect costs not tracked. Criteria: 2 CFR Subpart E requires the organization to conform to allowability of cost provisions, and 2 CFR 200.303 requires the organization to establish and maintain effective controls over internal controls. Cause: The organization does not utilize a formal mechanism to allocate indirect costs charged to grants. Effect: Indirect costs could be charged improperly and could be charged to multiple grants. Recommendation: The organization should track overhead costs in a pool and perform an ongoing calculation to reclassify allowable amounts to each grant. Repeat Finding? No

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Federal Program: Department of Health and Human Services, Improving the Health of Americans through Prevention and Management of Diabetes and Heart Disease and Stroke; 93.426, passed through District of Columbia Department of Health Condition and Context: Indirect costs charged to the federal grant were not supported by an appropriate and consistently applied methodology. General overhead costs exceed the amounts charged to the grant, however, allocations of indirect costs not tracked. Criteria: 2 CFR Subpart E requires the organization to conform to allowability of cost provisions, and 2 CFR 200.303 requires the organization to establish and maintain effective controls over internal controls. Cause: The organization does not utilize a formal mechanism to allocate indirect costs charged to grants. Effect: Indirect costs could be charged improperly and could be charged to multiple grants. Recommendation: The organization should track overhead costs in a pool and perform an ongoing calculation to reclassify allowable amounts to each grant. Repeat Finding? No

Corrective Action Plan

Management agrees with the finding and will implement a cost pool for allowable overhead expenses to be combined then allocated to various grants.

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →
2021-004
Cost Allowability

Federal Program: Department of Agriculture, Farmers Market and Local Food Promotion Program 10.175 Condition and Context: Indirect costs charged to the federal grant were not supported by an appropriate and consistently applied methodology. General overhead costs exceed the amounts charged to the grant, however, allocations of indirect costs were not tracked. Criteria: 2 CFR Subpart E requires the organization to conform to allowability of cost provisions, and 2 CFR 200.303 requires the organization to establish and maintain effective controls over internal controls. Cause: The organization does not utilize a formal mechanism to allocate indirect costs charged to grants. Effect: Indirect costs could be charged improperly and could be charged to multiple grants. Recommendation: The organization should track overhead costs in a pool and perform an ongoing calculation to reclassify allowable amounts to each grant. Repeat Finding? No

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Federal Program: Department of Agriculture, Farmers Market and Local Food Promotion Program 10.175 Condition and Context: Indirect costs charged to the federal grant were not supported by an appropriate and consistently applied methodology. General overhead costs exceed the amounts charged to the grant, however, allocations of indirect costs were not tracked. Criteria: 2 CFR Subpart E requires the organization to conform to allowability of cost provisions, and 2 CFR 200.303 requires the organization to establish and maintain effective controls over internal controls. Cause: The organization does not utilize a formal mechanism to allocate indirect costs charged to grants. Effect: Indirect costs could be charged improperly and could be charged to multiple grants. Recommendation: The organization should track overhead costs in a pool and perform an ongoing calculation to reclassify allowable amounts to each grant. Repeat Finding? No

Corrective Action Plan

Management agrees with the finding and will implement a cost pool for allowable overhead expenses to be combined then allocated to various grants.

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →
2021-005
Cost Allowability

Federal Program: Department of Agriculture 10.561 SNAP Cluster, passed through District of Columbia Department of Health Condition and Context: Indirect costs charged to the grant exceeded the approved indirect cost rate. The approved grant budget specified an indirect cost rate which was not used by the organization. Criteria: 2 CFR Subpart E requires the organization to conform to allowability of cost provisions. Cause: The organization reported indirect costs of 10% based on the de minimis rate and the grant agreement specified an indirect rate of 9.5%. Effect: Indirect costs charged to the grant differ from approved rates. Recommendation: The organization should ensure in its reimbursement requests that amounts requested for indirect costs are consistent with approved rates from the grant budget. Repeat Finding? No

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Federal Program: Department of Agriculture 10.561 SNAP Cluster, passed through District of Columbia Department of Health Condition and Context: Indirect costs charged to the grant exceeded the approved indirect cost rate. The approved grant budget specified an indirect cost rate which was not used by the organization. Criteria: 2 CFR Subpart E requires the organization to conform to allowability of cost provisions. Cause: The organization reported indirect costs of 10% based on the de minimis rate and the grant agreement specified an indirect rate of 9.5%. Effect: Indirect costs charged to the grant differ from approved rates. Recommendation: The organization should ensure in its reimbursement requests that amounts requested for indirect costs are consistent with approved rates from the grant budget. Repeat Finding? No

Corrective Action Plan

Management agrees with the finding and will follow the indirect cost rates in the grant agreements when requesting reimbursement.

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →
2021-006
Reporting

The annual report, Form 425, provided to the grantor contained errors when initially filed. Errors were noted in dollar amounts reported in federal cash receipts, federal cash disbursements, and federal share of unliquidated obligations; and the form omitted a required narrative. Subsequent to filing the form, the grantor agency contacted the organization seeking the omitted narrative. The organization prepared the revision, corrected the errors, and added the narrative. Criteria: 2 CFR 200.329 requires monitoring over program performance with annual reporting requirements. Cause: The lack of familiarity with preparing the form allowed the information to be submitted incorrectly. The agency then requested the organization to revise the report, which the organization complied with. Effect: Improper reporting could result in the federal agency exercising additional scrutiny over activities and possible loss in funding. Recommendation: The organization should become familiar with the reporting requirements and ensure all members of the team administering this grant are aware of the requirements. Repeat Finding? No

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Federal Program: Department of Agriculture, 10.175, Farmers Market and Local Food Promotion Program Condition: The annual report, Form 425, provided to the grantor contained errors when initially filed. Errors were noted in dollar amounts reported in federal cash receipts, federal cash disbursements, and federal share of unliquidated obligations; and the form omitted a required narrative. Subsequent to filing the form, the grantor agency contacted the organization seeking the omitted narrative. The organization prepared the revision, corrected the errors, and added the narrative. Criteria: 2 CFR 200.329 requires monitoring over program performance with annual reporting requirements. Cause: The lack of familiarity with preparing the form allowed the information to be submitted incorrectly. The agency then requested the organization to revise the report, which the organization complied with. Effect: Improper reporting could result in the federal agency exercising additional scrutiny over activities and possible loss in funding. Recommendation: The organization should become familiar with the reporting requirements and ensure all members of the team administering this grant are aware of the requirements. Repeat Finding? No

Corrective Action Plan

Management agrees with the finding and has corrected and resubmitted the report. Management will ensure the reporting team is familiar with the terms of the reports due to the awarding agency.

About Reporting →

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and compliance status.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.