Loogootee Community School Corporation

EIN: 351114047

UEI: C19GBZ59M6V5

Data as of August 23, 2026

Loogootee Community School Corporation5 audit years9 findings2 repeat
5
Audit Years
9
Total Findings
2
Repeat Findings

FY 2024-06-30

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on January 30, 2025. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by July 30, 2025 (390 days ago).

What is a management decision? →
2024-001
Special Tests & Provisions
MATERIAL WEAKNESS

An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Special Tests and Provisions – Wage Rate Requirements compliance requirements. Cause: The School Corporation's management had not developed a system of internal controls to ensure compliance with the compliance requirements listed above. Effect: The failure to design and implement an effective internal control system enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Special Tests and Provisions – Wage Rate Requirements compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: The School Corporation had one project for a new fabrication lab for students was funded with Impact Aid (84.041) grant awards. The School Corporation did not properly include Davis-Bacon wage rate requirements in the vendor contract, and did not obtain the weekly payroll reports certifications from the construction vendor to monitor compliance with Davis-Bacon wage rate requirements. Therefore, no review was performed to ensure that pay rates complied with the federal wage rate requirements. The total project cost disbursed during the audit period was $37,200 which included materials and labor. Identification as a repeat finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the School Corporation implement a formal process to ensure the required weekly payroll reports certifications are collected and reviewed for projects requiring labor installation and funded by federal grants subject to Davis-Bacon wage rate requirements to ensure compliance with federal regulations. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

FINDING 2024-001 Information on the federal program: Subject: Impact Aid – Special Tests and Provisions - Wage Rate Requirements Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Impact Aid Assistance Listing Number: 84.041 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S041A-2021-1617, S041A-2022-1617, S041A-2023-1617, S041A-2024-1617, S041B-2021-1616, S041B-2022-1616, S041B-2023-1616, S041B- 2024-1616 Pass-Through Entity: Direct Grant Compliance Requirement: Special Tests and Provisions - Wage Rate Requirements Audit Findings: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 29 CFR 5.5 states in part: (1) Minimum wages. (i) All laborers and mechanics employed or working upon the site of the work (or under the United States Housing Act of 1937 or under the Housing Act of 1949 in the construction or development of the project), will be paid unconditionally and not less often than once a week, and without subsequent deduction or rebate on any account (except such payroll deductions as are permitted by regulations issued by the Secretary of Labor under the Copeland Act (29 CFR part 3)), the full amount of wages and bona fide fringe benefits (or cash equivalents thereof) due at time of payment computed at rates not less than those contained in the wage determination of the Secretary of Labor which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, regardless of any contractual relationship which may be alleged to exist between the contractor and such laborers and mechanics… (3)(ii)(A) The contractor shall submit weekly for each week in which any contract work is performed a copy of all payrolls to the (write in name of appropriate federal agency) if the agency is a party to the contract, but if the agency is not such a party, the contractor will submit the payrolls to the applicant, sponsor, or owner, as the case may be, for transmission to the (write in name of agency). FINDING 2024-001 (Continued) 2 CFR 200 Appendix II states in part: In addition to other provisions required by the Federal agency or non-Federal entity; all contracts made by the non-Federal entity under the Federal award must contain provisions covering the following, as applicable. . . . (D) Davis-Bacon Act, as amended (40 U.S.C. 3141-3148). When required by Federal program legislation, all prime construction contracts in excess of $2,000 awarded by non-Federal entities must include a provision for compliance with the Davis-Bacon Act (40 U.S.C. 3141-3144, and 3146-3148) as supplemented by Department of Labor regulations (29 CFR Part 5, “Labor Standards Provisions Applicable to Contracts Covering Federally Financed and Assisted Construction”). In accordance with the statute, contractors must be required to pay wages to laborers and mechanics at a rate not less than the prevailing wages specified in a wage determination made by the Secretary of Labor. In addition, contractors must be required to pay wages not less than once a week.. . .” Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Special Tests and Provisions – Wage Rate Requirements compliance requirements. Cause: The School Corporation's management had not developed a system of internal controls to ensure compliance with the compliance requirements listed above. Effect: The failure to design and implement an effective internal control system enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Special Tests and Provisions – Wage Rate Requirements compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: The School Corporation had one project for a new fabrication lab for students was funded with Impact Aid (84.041) grant awards. The School Corporation did not properly include Davis-Bacon wage rate requirements in the vendor contract, and did not obtain the weekly payroll reports certifications from the construction vendor to monitor compliance with Davis-Bacon wage rate requirements. Therefore, no review was performed to ensure that pay rates complied with the federal wage rate requirements. The total project cost disbursed during the audit period was $37,200 which included materials and labor. Identification as a repeat finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the School Corporation implement a formal process to ensure the required weekly payroll reports certifications are collected and reviewed for projects requiring labor installation and funded by federal grants subject to Davis-Bacon wage rate requirements to ensure compliance with federal regulations. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.

Corrective Action Plan

1. Anytime funds from Impace Aid are used for construction projects the Davis - Bacon wage rate requirements will be monitored. 2. An effective internal control system will be put in place.

About Special Tests and Provisions →
2024-002
Reporting

An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirements. Cause: The School District's management had not developed a system of internal controls to ensure compliance with the compliance requirements listed above. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School Corporation at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. Internal controls were not adequate to detect and prevent errors in annual data submitted to the Indiana Department of Education. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. FINDING 2024-002 (Continued) Context: The School Corporation had not designed nor implemented a system of internal control to ensure that the annual Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER) annual Data Collection reports (Reports) were complete and accurately submitted. The reports were prepared and submitted in JotForm, the online application used by the Indiana Department of Education to collect information, without an oversight or secondary review process in place to prevent or detect and correct errors. During the testing of the annual data reports, variances were noted in the amounts expended reported on the Year 3 and Year 4 annual data reports for the ESSER II and ESSER III grant awards when compared to underlying disbursement detail for the grant funds. The amounts reported as expended in the Year 3 reports, which covers the period of July 1, 2021 through June 30, 2022, included amounts not expended until the following fiscal year. The amounts reported as expended in the Year 4 report, which covers the period of July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023, for ESSER III totaled $745,052 compared to underlying disbursement detail of $648,383 for the same period. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommend someone other than the preparer of the report perform a documented, secondary review of the report information prior to submission to validate the accuracy and completeness of the data submitted. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

FINDING 2024-002 Information on the federal program: Subject: COVID-19 – Education Stabilization Fund – Reporting Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 – Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listing Number: 84.425D, 84.425U Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425D200013, S425U210013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Finding: Significant Deficiency Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.302(b) states in part: "The financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for the following: (2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in §§ 200.328 Financial reporting . . . ." 34 CFR 76.722 states: "A State may require a subgrantee to submit reports in a manner and format that assists the State in complying with the requirements under 34 CFR 76.720 and in carrying out other responsibilities under the program." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirements. Cause: The School District's management had not developed a system of internal controls to ensure compliance with the compliance requirements listed above. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School Corporation at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. Internal controls were not adequate to detect and prevent errors in annual data submitted to the Indiana Department of Education. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. FINDING 2024-002 (Continued) Context: The School Corporation had not designed nor implemented a system of internal control to ensure that the annual Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER) annual Data Collection reports (Reports) were complete and accurately submitted. The reports were prepared and submitted in JotForm, the online application used by the Indiana Department of Education to collect information, without an oversight or secondary review process in place to prevent or detect and correct errors. During the testing of the annual data reports, variances were noted in the amounts expended reported on the Year 3 and Year 4 annual data reports for the ESSER II and ESSER III grant awards when compared to underlying disbursement detail for the grant funds. The amounts reported as expended in the Year 3 reports, which covers the period of July 1, 2021 through June 30, 2022, included amounts not expended until the following fiscal year. The amounts reported as expended in the Year 4 report, which covers the period of July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023, for ESSER III totaled $745,052 compared to underlying disbursement detail of $648,383 for the same period. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommend someone other than the preparer of the report perform a documented, secondary review of the report information prior to submission to validate the accuracy and completeness of the data submitted. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.

Corrective Action Plan

The Corporation will have a secondary review process in place to assure the information and timeline are correct before submission.

About Reporting →

FY 2020-06-30

FAC accepted this audit on June 24, 2021 — management decision was due December 24, 2021.

2020-001
Cash Management
MATERIAL WEAKNESS

FINDING 2020-001 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Cash Management Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, COVID-19 - School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, COVID-19 - National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children CFDA Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 18-19, FY 19-20, FY 20 51-5525 COVID Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Cash Management Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Cash Management compliance requirement. The School Corporation did not have adequate procedures in place to monitor the monthly cash balance (net cash resources) of the School Lunch fund to ensure that the amount did not exceed the threemonth average expenditures. The School Lunch fund cash balance was in excess of the three-month average expenditures for 10 of 24 months during the audit period. The School Corporation did not have a spend down plan in place. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues, which occurred throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 7 CFR 210.14(b) states: "Net cash resources. The school food authority shall limit its net cash resources to an amount that does not exceed 3 months average expenditures for its nonprofit school food service or such other amount as may be approved by the State agency in accordance with 210.19(a)." Cause Management had not developed or implemented a system of internal controls to ensure compliance with the grant agreement and the Cash Management compliance requirement. Effect The failure to establish an effective internal control system enabled noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Cash Management compliance requirement could have resulted in the loss of funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls related to the grant agreement and the Cash Management compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

FINDING 2020-001 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Cash Management Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, COVID-19 - School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, COVID-19 - National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children CFDA Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 18-19, FY 19-20, FY 20 51-5525 COVID Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Cash Management Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Cash Management compliance requirement. The School Corporation did not have adequate procedures in place to monitor the monthly cash balance (net cash resources) of the School Lunch fund to ensure that the amount did not exceed the threemonth average expenditures. The School Lunch fund cash balance was in excess of the three-month average expenditures for 10 of 24 months during the audit period. The School Corporation did not have a spend down plan in place. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues, which occurred throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 7 CFR 210.14(b) states: "Net cash resources. The school food authority shall limit its net cash resources to an amount that does not exceed 3 months average expenditures for its nonprofit school food service or such other amount as may be approved by the State agency in accordance with 210.19(a)." Cause Management had not developed or implemented a system of internal controls to ensure compliance with the grant agreement and the Cash Management compliance requirement. Effect The failure to establish an effective internal control system enabled noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Cash Management compliance requirement could have resulted in the loss of funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls related to the grant agreement and the Cash Management compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.

Corrective Action Plan

CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN FINDING 2020-001 Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Sandra LaMar, Corporation Treasurer Tim Stoner, Aramark General Manager Contact Phone Number: (812) 295-2595 (503) Views of Responsible Official: We concur with the finding. Description of Corrective Action Plan: The balance of Fund 800 will be monitored monthly by the Corporation Treasurer and the Aramark General Manager. A spend down plan will be created annually based on the fund balance. The spend down plan will be developed in June. Anticipated Completion Date: Immediately

About Cash Management →

FY 2018-06-30

FAC accepted this audit on April 11, 2019 — management decision was due October 11, 2019.

2018-001
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability
MATERIAL WEAKNESS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →
2018-002
Reporting
MATERIAL WEAKNESSREPEAT

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2016-002

About Reporting →
2018-003
Reporting / Special Tests & Provisions
MATERIAL WEAKNESSREPEAT

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2016-004

About Reporting, Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2016-06-30

FAC accepted this audit on April 23, 2018 — management decision was due October 23, 2018.

2016-002
Reporting / Special Tests & Provisions
MATERIAL WEAKNESS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Reporting, Special Tests and Provisions →
2016-003
Eligibility
MATERIAL WEAKNESS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Eligibility →
2016-004
Reporting / Special Tests & Provisions
MATERIAL WEAKNESS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Reporting, Special Tests and Provisions →

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and compliance status.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.