South Adams Schools

EIN: 351085371

UEI: GBF7WJKDM683

Data as of August 19, 2026

5
Audit Years
9
Total Findings
1
Repeat Findings

FY 2024-06-30

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on March 20, 2025. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by September 20, 2025, which was (334 days ago).

What is a management decision? →
2024-001
Equipment & Real Property
REPEATMATERIAL WEAKNESS
Condition

Information on the federal program: Subject: Education Stabilization Fund (ESSER) – Internal Controls Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 – Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listing Number: 84.425D, 84.425U Federal Award Numbers: S425D210013, S425U210013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Equipment and Real Property Management Audit Findings: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR 200.313(d) states in part: "Management requirements. Procedures for managing equipment (including replacement equipment), whether acquired in whole or in part under a Federal award, until disposition takes place will, as a minimum, meet the following requirements: (1) Property records must be maintained that include a description of the property, a serial number or other identification number, the source of funding for the property (including the FAIN), who holds title, the acquisition date, and cost of the property, percentage of Federal participation in the project costs for the Federal award under which the property was acquired, the location, use and condition of the property, and any ultimate disposition data including the date of disposal and sale price of the property. (2) A physical inventory of the property must be taken and the results reconciled with the property records at least once every two years. (3) A control system must be developed to ensure adequate safeguards to prevent loss, damage, or theft of the property. Any loss, damage, or theft must be investigated. (4) Adequate maintenance procedures must be developed to keep the property in good condition. . . ." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Equipment and Real Property Management Requirements compliance requirements. Cause: The School Corporation's management had not developed a system of internal controls to ensure compliance with the compliance requirements listed above. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School Corporation at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. A lack of segregation of duties within an internal control system could have also allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirements and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the programs. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: During the grant period, the School Corporation expended a total of $5,803,458 in Education Stabilization Funds (ESSER) for a building project. Although this project was included in the School Corporation's capital asset records, it was recorded at the estimated total project cost of $6,256,000 in a prior audit period prior to these costs being expended. In addition, the School Corporation did not designate the amount of the project that was paid with federal grant funds, complete an inventory in the two-year audit period, or record expenditures and report budgeted amounts in the proper object code. Identification as a repeat finding: Yes. See finding 2022-006 Recommendation: We recommend the School Corporation update the capital asset listing at least annually to include all equipment and real property acquisitions and review for potential capital asset dispositions. The capital asset listing should include all required information to track capital asset acquisitions purchased with federal funding. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.

Corrective Action Plan

Information on the federal program: Subject: Education Stabilization Fund (ESSER) – Internal Controls Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 – Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listing Number: 84.425D, 84.425U Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425D210013, S425U210013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Equipment and Real Property Management Audit Finding: Material Weakness Context: During the grant period, the School Corporation expended a total of $5,803,458 in Economic Stabilization Funds (ESSER) for a building project. Although this project was included in the School Corporation's capital asset records, it was recorded at the estimated total project cost of $6,256,000 in a prior audit period prior to these costs being expended. In addition, the School Corporation did not designate the amount of the project that was paid with federal grant funds, complete an inventory in the two-year audit period, or record expenditures and report budgeted amounts in the proper object code. Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Heidi Sprunger Contact Phone Number: 260-589-3133 Views of Responsible Official: We concur with the finding. Description of Corrective Action Plan: The School Corporation will reach out to Asset Controls to have them fix the expended amount of $5,803,458 to reflect on our reports. The School Corporation will also have Asset Controls itemize which project was paid for with federal grant funds to reflect our reports. The School Corporation will put into place the following schedule to update our inventory to stay in compliance with state and federal requirements. The School Corporation will have Asset Controls or the Director of Operations physically count the inventory of capital assets on even year audits. During the odd year audits, the School Corporation will have Asset Controls or the Director of Operations perform a perpetual count. Anticipated Completion Date: 06/30/2025

Prior Finding References

2022-006

About Equipment and Real Property Management →

FY 2022-06-30

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on March 27, 2023. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by September 27, 2023, which was (1058 days ago).

What is a management decision? →
2022-002
Cost Allowability
MATERIAL WEAKNESSQUESTIONED COSTS
Condition

FINDING 2022-002 Information on the federal program: Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY2021, FY2022 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)...." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." 2 CFR 200.430(i) states in part: "Standards for documentation of Personnel Expenses (1) Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: (i) Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated; (ii) Be incorporated into the official records of the non-Federal entity; (iii) Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non- Federal entity, not exceeding 100% of compensated activities (for IHE, this per the IHE's definition of IBS); . . . (vii) Support the distribution of the employee's salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award; a Federal award and non-Federal award; an indirect cost activity and a direct cost activity; two or more indirect activities which are allocated using different allocation bases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect cost activity. . . ." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirement. Cause: Management had not developed a system of internal control that that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs: Known questioned costs of $47,835 were identified as detailed in the Context section. Context: Documentation supporting employees? time charged to the Child Nutrition Cluster program for custodians and a grant specialist was not properly maintained. Each employee had a specific percentage of their pay charged to the School Lunch fund, without documentation of a proper time study or actual hours worked on the program. The same percentage was used each pay period. Fringe benefits that were directly associated with the payroll were also charged to the program. The total amount charged to the program for these employees was $47,835. This amount was considered questioned costs. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation?s management establish a system of internal control to ensure compliance and comply with the grant agreement and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.

Corrective Action Plan

CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN FINDING 2022-002 Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Heidi Sprunger Contact Phone Number: 260-589-3133 Views of Responsible Official: We concur with the finding the documentation supporting employees? time charged to the Child Nutrition Cluster program for custodians and grant specialist was not properly maintained. However, we disagree that they would be considered an indirect cost according to the definition of indirect cost: (Indirect costs are sometimes referred to as ?overhead costs? and more recently as ?facilities and administrative costs.?) Examples include executive oversight, accounting, grants management, legal expenses, utilities, technology support, and facility maintenance. Description of Corrective Action Plan: The district will evaluate and determine which employees will continue to be charged under the Child Nutrition Cluster Program. Only those employees spending direct physical time in the cafeteria doing work will continue to be under the Child Nutrition Cluster Program. Once identified those employees will be required to fill out a separate time sheet for hours worked under the Child Nutrition Cluster program. Those time sheets will then be approved by the Food Service Director. Once approved they will be submitted to Payroll Coordinator. Anticipated Completion Date: March 20, 2023

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →
2022-003
Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
Condition

FINDING 2022-003 Information on the federal program: Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555 Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): FY2021 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Significant Deficiency Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Cause: Management had not developed a system of internal control that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the suspension and debarment requirements of the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the suspension and debarment requirements of the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: The School Corporation was a member of the Region 8 Educational Service Center (Service Center). The Service Center completed the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirements on behalf of the School Corporation for the 2020-2021 school year. Because the grant agreements were between the Indiana Department of Education and the School Corporation, the School Corporation was ultimately responsible for compliance with the grant agreement and the suspension and debarment requirements of the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. The bids for bread and milk were originally awarded for the 2018-2019 school year and were renewed for the 2020-2021 school year. The Service Center could not provide documentation that procedures were performed to verify the vendors were not suspended or debarred from participation in federal programs prior to entering into covered transactions with these vendors. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were isolated to the 2020-2021 school year. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal control to ensure compliance and comply with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.

Corrective Action Plan

CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN FINDING 2022-003 Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Heidi Sprunger Contact Phone Number: 260-589-3133 Views of Responsible Official: We concur with the finding. The district is working with Region 8 to obtain the corrective action plan that was submitted previously. Description of Corrective Action Plan: We will monitor this with Region 8 to ensure that the corrective action plan that was submitted is followed. Anticipated Completion Date: Immediately

About Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →
2022-004
Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
MATERIAL WEAKNESS
Condition

FINDING 2022-004 Information on the federal program: Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program National School Lunch Program Assistance Listing Numbers: 10.553, 10.555 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY2022 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Qualified Opinion Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)...." 2 CFR 200.318 states in part: "(a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in ?? 200.317 through 200.327. . . . (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price.? 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use document procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and ??200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in ? 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non- Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: (2) Small purchases ? (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity? (b) Formal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal financial assistance award exceeds the SAT, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods require following documented procedures. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a noncompetitive procurement can be used in accordance with ? 200.319 or paragraph (c) of this section. The following formal methods of procurement are used for procurement of property or services above the simplified acquisition threshold or a value below the simplified acquisition threshold the non-Federal entity determines to be appropriate: (1) Sealed bids. A procurement method in which bids are publicly solicited and a firm fixed-price contract (lump sum or unit price) is awarded to the responsible bidder whose bid, conforming with all the material terms and conditions of the invitation for bids, is the lowest in price. . . . (i) In order for sealed bidding to be feasible, the following conditions should be present. . . . (B) Two or more responsible bidders. . .. (ii) If sealed bids are used, the following requirements apply: (A) Bids must be solicited from an adequate number of qualified sources. . .. ? 2CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Condition: An effective internal control system was not designed, nor implemented at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000. However, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold of $150,000 or less for when small purchase procedures may be used. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. Cause: Management had not developed nor implemented a system of internal control that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: During school year 2021-2022, the School Corporation did not follow procurement requirements for purchases of food and supply items which exceeded the simplified acquisition threshold of $150,000. The School Corporation did not correctly procure a contract for the one vendor that exceeded the simplified acquisition threshold. The School Corporation only considered one bid which did not adequately meet the formal procurement procedures for a simplified acquisition. Additionally, the School Corporation did not verify that this vendor was not suspended or debarred. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were isolated to the 2021-2022 school year. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal control to ensure compliance and comply with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.

Corrective Action Plan

CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN FINDING 2022-004 Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Region 8/Heidi Sprunger Contact Phone Number: 260-589-3133 Views of Responsible Official: We concur with the finding. The district is working with Region 8 to obtain the corrective action plan that was submitted previously. Description of Corrective Action Plan: We will monitor this with Region 8 to ensure that the corrective action plan that was submitted is followed. Anticipated Completion Date: Immediately

About Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →
2022-005
Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking
Condition

FINDING 2022-005 Information on the federal program: Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Earmarking Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Special Education Grants to States Assistance Listing Number: 84.027, 84.173 Federal Award Number: 20611-001-PN01, 21619-001-PN01 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking Audit Findings: Significant Deficiency Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)...." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards:? (g) Be adequately documented.... " 2 CFR 200.208(b) states in part: "The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may adjust specific Federal award conditions as needed..." 511 IAC 7-34-7(b) states: "The public agency, in providing special education and related services to students in nonpublic schools must expend at least an amount that is the same proportion of the public agency total subgrant under 20 U.S.C. 1411(f) as the number of nonpublic school students with disabilities, who are enrolled by their parents in nonpublic schools within its boundaries, is to the total number of students with disabilities of the same age range Condition: The School Corporation is a member of the Adams Wells Special Services Cooperative (Cooperative). During fiscal year 2021-2022, the Cooperative operated the special education programs and spent the federal money on behalf of all its member schools. As the grant agreements were between the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE) and each member school, the school corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. There was inadequate oversight performed by the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. The School Corporation did not have internal controls in place to ensure that the Cooperative complied with the earmarking requirements. The Cooperative did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that the required level of expenditures for non-public school students with disabilities was met for each member school. The Cooperative did not have effective internal controls to ensure non-public school expenditures were appropriately identified and reported. Cause: The School Corporation's management had not developed an effective system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreements and the earmarking requirements of the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system, as well as adequately document costs of federal awards, prevented the determination of the School Corporation's compliance with the earmarking requirements of the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: The Non-Public Proportionate Share expenditures for the 20611-001-PN01 and 21619-001-PN01 grant awards could not be verified for the individual member schools. Total non-public expenditures were posted as expended. The member school proportionate share expenditures were then determined by applying a budgeted percentage to the total non-public expenditures. These were the amounts reported to IDOE. As such, we were unable to identify if the minimum amount per member school was expended and properly reported to IDOE as required. The School Corporation?s Non-Public Proportionate Share for the 20611-001-PN01 and 21619-001-PN01 grant applications was $1,975 and $0, respectively. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish an effective system of internal controls, as well as appropriately document and identify federal award expenditures to ensure compliance with the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.

Corrective Action Plan

CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN FINDING 2022-005 Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Special Education Cluster/Heidi Sprunger Contact Phone Number: 260-589-3133 Views of Responsible Official: We concur with the finding. The district is working with Special Education Cluster to obtain the corrective action plan that was submitted previously. Description of Corrective Action Plan: We will monitor this with Adams-Wells Special Services Co-op to ensure that the corrective action plan that was submitted will be followed. Anticipated Completion Date: Immediately

About Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking →
2022-006
Equipment & Real Property
Condition

FINDING 2022-006 Information on the federal program: Subject: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund - Equipment and Real Property Management Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.425D, 84.425U Federal Award Numbers or Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425D200013, S425D2100013, S425U210013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Equipment and Real Property Management Audit Findings: Significant Deficiency Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.313(d)(1) states: "Property records must be maintained that include a description of the property, a serial number or other identification number, the source of funding for the property (including the FAIN), who holds title, the acquisition date, and cost of the property, percentage of Federal participation in the project costs for the Federal award under which the property was acquired, the location, use and condition of the property, and any ultimate disposition data including the date of disposal and sale price of the property." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Equipment and Real Property Management compliance requirement. Cause: Management had not developed a system of internal control that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the Equipment and Real Property Management compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Equipment and Real Property Management compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: During the audit period, the School Corporation expended $1,685,526 in Economic Stabilization Funds (ESSER) for a building project. Although this project was included in the School Corporation?s capital asset records, it was recorded at the estimated total project cost of $6,256,000. In addition, the School Corporation did not designate the amount of the project that was paid with federal grant funds. The lack of internal controls was limited to the building project. Identification as a repeat finding: No. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal control to ensure compliance and comply with the grant agreement and the Equipment and Real Property Management compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management does not agree with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.

Corrective Action Plan

CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN FINDING 2022-006 Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Heidi Sprunger Contact Phone Number: 260-589-3133 Views of Responsible Official: The district does not concur with this finding. The reason is as follows: According to the federal grant guidelines you must not pay for any work, services, or products on a project until the work is completed. The $1,685,526 is what was completed within the timeframe of the audit. Asset Control company is who the district uses to complete their capital asset listing every 2 years. At the time of the visit Asset Control was made aware of our project. They had requested that we provide them with the entire project cost. Asset Control wanted to include the full price for insurance coverage because the project would still be ongoing. The district provided documentation of the invoices paid during the audit period to show the amount of the project was paid for federal grant funds at the time of the audit period. Description of Corrective Action Plan: The district has no corrective action plan because the project is now completed and Asset Control company has the full cost of the project list within our assets. Anticipated Completion Date: Immediately

About Equipment and Real Property Management →
2022-007
Special Tests & Provisions
MATERIAL WEAKNESS
Condition

FINDING 2022-007 Information on the federal program: Subject: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund - Special Tests and Provisions - Wage Rate Requirements Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listings Number: 84.425U Federal Award Numbers or Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425U210013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Special Tests and Provisions - Wage Rate Requirements Audit Finding: Material Weakness, Qualified Opinion Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." Condition: An effective internal control system was not designed, nor implemented at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Special Tests and Provisions -? Wage Rate Requirements compliance requirement. All laborers and mechanics employed by contractors or subcontractors to work on construction contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by federal assistance funds must be paid pay wages not less than those established for the locality of the project (prevailing wage rates) by the Department of Labor (DOL) to their laborers and mechanics. Nonfederal entities are to include in their construction contracts subject to the Wage Rate Requirements a provision that the contractor or subcontractor comply with these requirements and the DOL regulations. This would include a requirement to submit a copy of the payroll and statement of compliance to the entity for each week in which contract work was performed. SOUTH ADAMS SCHOOLS SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS July 1, 2020 through June 30, 2022 54. Section III ? Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (Continued) FINDING 2022-007 (Continued) Cause: Management had not developed or implemented a system of internal control that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the Special Tests and Provisions - Wage Rate Requirements compliance requirement Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: The School Corporation had the required clause in the contract and received the payroll; however, the School Corporation did not have adequate policies or procedures to ensure that the required payrolls were submitted and reviewed for each week in which contract work was performed. Identification as a repeat finding: No. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish internal controls to ensure compliance with the grant agreement and the Special Tests and Provisions - Wage Rate Requirements compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.

Corrective Action Plan

CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN FINDING 2022-007 Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Heidi Sprunger Contact Phone Number: 260-589-3133 Views of Responsible Official: We concur with the finding. The district provided documentation of the email correspondence with the design build project manager. The project manager emailed the district once a month with two separate invoices showing what work had been completed on the project. Once the email was received we had an individual internally check the invoices line for line to confirm that all costs were included in both invoices. Verbal authorization was given to accounts payable to proceed with payment. The district did not have documentation of email verification attesting approval of the invoices. Description of Corrective Action Plan: We have spoken to PSI about a process. We have determined the following, PSI requires subcontractors to submit the certified payroll reports along with their billings. PSI accounting team collects and verifies dates of the CP reports. PSI does not fund the subcontractors? billings until receipt of reports. Once PSI had verified their process the billings will be sent to the district and approval from the Superintendent or Business Manager will be determined before bills will be submitted to the Business Office Manager for submission of payment for the School Board Approval. Anticipated Completion Date: Immediately

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2016-06-30

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on October 10, 2017. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by April 10, 2018, which was (3054 days ago).

What is a management decision? →
2016-002
Cash Management / Reporting
MATERIAL WEAKNESS
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Cash Management, Reporting →
2016-003
Cost Allowability
MATERIAL WEAKNESS
Condition

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and compliance status.

Start monitoring →

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.