EIN: 346000191
UEI: WVAAHEMET2E5
Data as of August 23, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on March 20, 2025. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by September 20, 2025 (337 days ago).
What is a management decision? →2 CFR section 200.303 requires that non-Federal entities receiving Federal awards establish and maintain internal control over the Federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal awards. The School District employs a food service management company to oversee and conduct the activities of the food service department. The School District paid a lump sum to the food service management company each month, but there was no evidence that the School District reviewed any of the supporting invoices to verify amounts paid were for allowable activities and costs. Failure to have policies and procedures over allowable activities, allowable costs could result in unallowable costs and activities being charged to the federal program. The School District should review all detailed invoices from their food service management company. The School District should ensure to only reimburse the food service management company for allowable activities and costs for the Nutrition Cluster Federal Program.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴2 CFR section 200.303 requires that non-Federal entities receiving Federal awards establish and maintain internal control over the Federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal awards. The School District employs a food service management company to oversee and conduct the activities of the food service department. The School District paid a lump sum to the food service management company each month, but there was no evidence that the School District reviewed any of the supporting invoices to verify amounts paid were for allowable activities and costs. Failure to have policies and procedures over allowable activities, allowable costs could result in unallowable costs and activities being charged to the federal program. The School District should review all detailed invoices from their food service management company. The School District should ensure to only reimburse the food service management company for allowable activities and costs for the Nutrition Cluster Federal Program.
The school district will implement a formal policy requiring detailed review and approval of all food service management invoices to ensure compliance with federal regulations. Staff will be trained on allowable costs and a standardized checklist will be used for invoice reviews. Monthly reviews, periodic audits, and updated procedures for handling unallowable costs will be established to ensure ongoing compliance and proper documentation.
FAC accepted this audit on July 11, 2023 — management decision was due January 11, 2024.
Prevailing Wage Rates ? Noncompliance/Material Weakness Finding Number: 2022-001 Assistance Listing Number and Title: AL #84.425D/84.425U/84.425W Education Stabilization Fund Federal Award Identification Number / Year: None / 2022 Federal Agency: US Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Special Tests and Provisions ? Wage Rate Requirements Pass-Through Entity: Ohio Department of Education Repeat Finding from Prior Audit? No 2 CFR ? 3474.1 gives regulatory effect to the Department of Education for Appendix II to 2 CFR ? 200 which states that, in addition to other provisions required by the Federal agency or non-Federal entity, all contracts made by the non-Federal entity under the Federal award must contain provisions covering the following, as applicable: Appendix II to Part 200 (D) Davis-Bacon Act, as amended (40 U.S.C. 3141-3148). When required by Federal program legislation, all prime construction contracts in excess of $2,000 awarded by non-Federal entities must include a provision for compliance with the Davis-Bacon Act (40 U.S.C. 3141-3144, and 3146-3148) as supplemented by Department of Labor regulations (29 CFR Part 5, ?Labor Standards Provisions Applicable to Contracts Covering Federally Financed and Assisted Construction?). In accordance with the statute, contractors must be required to pay wages to laborers and mechanics at a rate not less than the prevailing wages specified in a wage determination made by the Secretary of Labor. In addition, contractors must be required to pay wages not less than once a week. The non-Federal entity must place a copy of the current prevailing wage determination issued by the Department of Labor in each solicitation. The decision to award a contract or subcontract must be conditioned upon the acceptance of the wage determination. The non-Federal entity must report all suspected or reported violations to the Federal awarding agency. The contracts must also include a provision for compliance with the Copeland ?Anti-Kickback? Act (40 U.S.C. 3145), as supplemented by Department of Labor regulations (29 CFR Part 3, ?Contractors and Subcontractors on Public Building or Public Work Financed in Whole or in Part by Loans or Grants from the United States?). The Act provides that each contractor or subrecipient must be prohibited from inducing, by any means, any person employed in the construction, completion, or repair of public work, to give up any part of the compensation to which he or she is otherwise entitled. The non-Federal entity must report all suspected or reported violations to the Federal awarding agency. 29 CFR ? 5.5(a)(3)(ii)(A) requires, in part, that a contract in excess of $2,000, which is entered into for the actual construction, alteration and/or repair of a public building or public work, or building or work financed in whole or in part from Federal funds or in accordance with guarantees of a Federal agency or financed from funds obtained by pledge of any contract of a Federal agency to make a loan, grant or annual contribution shall require a clause that the contractor shall submit weekly for each week in which any contract work is performed a copy of all payrolls to the appropriate agency if the agency is a party to the contract, but if the agency is not such a party, the contractor will submit the payrolls to the applicant, sponsor, or owner, as the case may be, for transmission to the agency. Agencies which do not directly enter into such contracts shall promulgate the necessary regulations or procedures to require the recipient of the Federal assistance to insert in its contracts the provisions of ? 5.5. 29 CFR ? 5.6 further states, in part, that no payment, advance, grant, loan, or guarantee of funds shall be approved by the Federal agency unless the agency ensures that the clauses required by ? 5.5 and the appropriate wage determination of the Secretary of Labor are contained in such contracts. Sound accounting practices require public officials to design and operate a system of internal control that is adequate to provide reasonable assurance over the reliability of federal information provided for federal reimbursement. The School District paid Farnham Equipment Company $117,025 for the purchase, removal, and installation of new chairs in the high school auditorium. Of the $117,025 paid, $63,025 was paid from the Education Stabilization Fund (ESSER II). Due to a of a lack of proper internal controls, the School District failed to enter into a formal contract with the required clauses concerning prevailing wage rate and the requirement that the contractor shall submit weekly, for each week in which any contract work is performed, a copy of all payrolls to the School District. Without proper controls over wage rate requirements, there is an increased risk that the School District and its contractors and subcontractors are not in compliance with applicable federal regulations. Additionally, noncompliance could result in federal funding being reduced or taken away, or other sanctions imposed by the federal grantor agency. The School District should establish controls to ensure the required contracts are entered into and include the required clauses of 29 CFR 5.5, particularly those concerning prevailing wage rate and the requirement that the contractor shall submit weekly, for each week in which any contract work is performed, a copy of all payrolls to (or for transmission to, where applicable) the School District, in its construction contracts (and subcontracts) greater than $2,000 that are covered by the wage rate requirements and take steps to ensure contractors (and subcontractors, if applicable) are in compliance with all labor standards by collecting the required certified payroll documentation in a timely manner. The School District should obtain the necessary information from the contractor to document compliance with the program, in addition to documenting their controls over the compliance requirements.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Prevailing Wage Rates ? Noncompliance/Material Weakness Finding Number: 2022-001 Assistance Listing Number and Title: AL #84.425D/84.425U/84.425W Education Stabilization Fund Federal Award Identification Number / Year: None / 2022 Federal Agency: US Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Special Tests and Provisions ? Wage Rate Requirements Pass-Through Entity: Ohio Department of Education Repeat Finding from Prior Audit? No 2 CFR ? 3474.1 gives regulatory effect to the Department of Education for Appendix II to 2 CFR ? 200 which states that, in addition to other provisions required by the Federal agency or non-Federal entity, all contracts made by the non-Federal entity under the Federal award must contain provisions covering the following, as applicable: Appendix II to Part 200 (D) Davis-Bacon Act, as amended (40 U.S.C. 3141-3148). When required by Federal program legislation, all prime construction contracts in excess of $2,000 awarded by non-Federal entities must include a provision for compliance with the Davis-Bacon Act (40 U.S.C. 3141-3144, and 3146-3148) as supplemented by Department of Labor regulations (29 CFR Part 5, ?Labor Standards Provisions Applicable to Contracts Covering Federally Financed and Assisted Construction?). In accordance with the statute, contractors must be required to pay wages to laborers and mechanics at a rate not less than the prevailing wages specified in a wage determination made by the Secretary of Labor. In addition, contractors must be required to pay wages not less than once a week. The non-Federal entity must place a copy of the current prevailing wage determination issued by the Department of Labor in each solicitation. The decision to award a contract or subcontract must be conditioned upon the acceptance of the wage determination. The non-Federal entity must report all suspected or reported violations to the Federal awarding agency. The contracts must also include a provision for compliance with the Copeland ?Anti-Kickback? Act (40 U.S.C. 3145), as supplemented by Department of Labor regulations (29 CFR Part 3, ?Contractors and Subcontractors on Public Building or Public Work Financed in Whole or in Part by Loans or Grants from the United States?). The Act provides that each contractor or subrecipient must be prohibited from inducing, by any means, any person employed in the construction, completion, or repair of public work, to give up any part of the compensation to which he or she is otherwise entitled. The non-Federal entity must report all suspected or reported violations to the Federal awarding agency. 29 CFR ? 5.5(a)(3)(ii)(A) requires, in part, that a contract in excess of $2,000, which is entered into for the actual construction, alteration and/or repair of a public building or public work, or building or work financed in whole or in part from Federal funds or in accordance with guarantees of a Federal agency or financed from funds obtained by pledge of any contract of a Federal agency to make a loan, grant or annual contribution shall require a clause that the contractor shall submit weekly for each week in which any contract work is performed a copy of all payrolls to the appropriate agency if the agency is a party to the contract, but if the agency is not such a party, the contractor will submit the payrolls to the applicant, sponsor, or owner, as the case may be, for transmission to the agency. Agencies which do not directly enter into such contracts shall promulgate the necessary regulations or procedures to require the recipient of the Federal assistance to insert in its contracts the provisions of ? 5.5. 29 CFR ? 5.6 further states, in part, that no payment, advance, grant, loan, or guarantee of funds shall be approved by the Federal agency unless the agency ensures that the clauses required by ? 5.5 and the appropriate wage determination of the Secretary of Labor are contained in such contracts. Sound accounting practices require public officials to design and operate a system of internal control that is adequate to provide reasonable assurance over the reliability of federal information provided for federal reimbursement. The School District paid Farnham Equipment Company $117,025 for the purchase, removal, and installation of new chairs in the high school auditorium. Of the $117,025 paid, $63,025 was paid from the Education Stabilization Fund (ESSER II). Due to a of a lack of proper internal controls, the School District failed to enter into a formal contract with the required clauses concerning prevailing wage rate and the requirement that the contractor shall submit weekly, for each week in which any contract work is performed, a copy of all payrolls to the School District. Without proper controls over wage rate requirements, there is an increased risk that the School District and its contractors and subcontractors are not in compliance with applicable federal regulations. Additionally, noncompliance could result in federal funding being reduced or taken away, or other sanctions imposed by the federal grantor agency. The School District should establish controls to ensure the required contracts are entered into and include the required clauses of 29 CFR 5.5, particularly those concerning prevailing wage rate and the requirement that the contractor shall submit weekly, for each week in which any contract work is performed, a copy of all payrolls to (or for transmission to, where applicable) the School District, in its construction contracts (and subcontracts) greater than $2,000 that are covered by the wage rate requirements and take steps to ensure contractors (and subcontractors, if applicable) are in compliance with all labor standards by collecting the required certified payroll documentation in a timely manner. The School District should obtain the necessary information from the contractor to document compliance with the program, in addition to documenting their controls over the compliance requirements.
Finding Number: 2022-001 Planned Corrective Action: The district will improve internal controls to make sure clauses concerning prevailing wage rates are within construction projects and that contractors must submit copies of payroll and certify that prevailing wages were paid. Anticipated Completion Date: 6/1/2023 Responsible Contact Person: Adam Quirk, Treasurer
Procurement ? Noncompliance/Material Weakness Finding Number: 2022-002 Assistance Listing Number and Title: AL #84.425D/84.425U/84.425W Education Stabilization Fund Federal Award Identification Number / Year: None / 2022 Federal Agency: US Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Pass-Through Entity: Ohio Department of Education Repeat Finding from Prior Audit? No 2 CFR ? 3474.1 gives regulatory effect to the Department of Education for 2 CFR ? 200.319 (a) which states, in part, all procurement transactions for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award must be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition consistent with the standards of this section and ? 200.320. 2 CFR ? 3474.1 gives regulatory effect to the Department of Education for 2 CFR ? 200.320 (b) which states, in part, when the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal financial assistance award exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods require following documented procedures. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a non-competitive procurement can be used in accordance with ? 200.319 or paragraph (c) of this section. The School District's Federal Procurement policy DJI provides, in part, ?when using federal money for procurement, the District shall conform to applicable Federal laws, regulations, and standards?. The School District's policy also states, ?The District shall seek a minimum of two price quotations for any proposed procurement that will be paid for with federal monies, even if the bidding amount falls below the applicable federal or state competitive bidding thresholds or the District-imposed threshold set forth in Board Policy DJF, unless the procurement falls under federal requirements for a noncompetitive proposal.? Board Policy DJF-R provides, the School District will obtain price rates or quotations from a minimum of two vendors for small purchases between $10,000 and $250,000 when using federal funds. The School District contracted with Farnham Equipment Company and paid $63,025 from the Education Stabilization Fund. The School District was unable to provide documentation that they obtained a minimum of two price quotations or documentation that procurement policies were followed. Without proper controls over procurement, there is an increased risk that the School District is not in compliance with applicable federal regulations. Additionally, noncompliance could result in federal funding being reduced or taken away, or other sanctions imposed by the federal grantor agency. The School District should review the federal regulations and ensure that all required procurement policies are followed for applicable contracts.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Procurement ? Noncompliance/Material Weakness Finding Number: 2022-002 Assistance Listing Number and Title: AL #84.425D/84.425U/84.425W Education Stabilization Fund Federal Award Identification Number / Year: None / 2022 Federal Agency: US Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Pass-Through Entity: Ohio Department of Education Repeat Finding from Prior Audit? No 2 CFR ? 3474.1 gives regulatory effect to the Department of Education for 2 CFR ? 200.319 (a) which states, in part, all procurement transactions for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award must be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition consistent with the standards of this section and ? 200.320. 2 CFR ? 3474.1 gives regulatory effect to the Department of Education for 2 CFR ? 200.320 (b) which states, in part, when the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal financial assistance award exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods require following documented procedures. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a non-competitive procurement can be used in accordance with ? 200.319 or paragraph (c) of this section. The School District's Federal Procurement policy DJI provides, in part, ?when using federal money for procurement, the District shall conform to applicable Federal laws, regulations, and standards?. The School District's policy also states, ?The District shall seek a minimum of two price quotations for any proposed procurement that will be paid for with federal monies, even if the bidding amount falls below the applicable federal or state competitive bidding thresholds or the District-imposed threshold set forth in Board Policy DJF, unless the procurement falls under federal requirements for a noncompetitive proposal.? Board Policy DJF-R provides, the School District will obtain price rates or quotations from a minimum of two vendors for small purchases between $10,000 and $250,000 when using federal funds. The School District contracted with Farnham Equipment Company and paid $63,025 from the Education Stabilization Fund. The School District was unable to provide documentation that they obtained a minimum of two price quotations or documentation that procurement policies were followed. Without proper controls over procurement, there is an increased risk that the School District is not in compliance with applicable federal regulations. Additionally, noncompliance could result in federal funding being reduced or taken away, or other sanctions imposed by the federal grantor agency. The School District should review the federal regulations and ensure that all required procurement policies are followed for applicable contracts.
Finding Number: 2022-002 Planned Corrective Action: The district will improve internal controls to ensure that all contracts utilizing federal funds will adhere to both state and federal procurement guidelines as well as the School District?s procurement guidelines. Anticipated Completion Date: 6/1/2023 Responsible Contact Person: Adam Quirk, Treasurer
FAC accepted this audit on March 18, 2018 — management decision was due September 18, 2018.
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Monitor subrecipient audit findings and compliance status.
Start monitoring →© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.