Wood County Village, Inc.

EIN: 341823400

UEI: XEDQA3PWMFR6

Data as of August 24, 2026

Wood County Village, Inc.10 audit years6 findings1 repeat
10
Audit Years
6
Total Findings
1
Repeat Findings

FY 2024-06-30

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on November 11, 2024. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by May 11, 2025 (470 days ago).

What is a management decision? →
2024-001
Special Tests & Provisions
MATERIAL WEAKNESS

Numerous accounts were identified that required adjustment as part of our audit procedures, including accounts receivable -HUD and depreciation expense. Due to the number and nature of the required audit adjustments, we are considering this deficiency to be a material weakness in internal control over financial reporting. The misstatements that were discovered as a result of audit procedures would have had the following impact on the financial statements if left unadjusted: Assets understated by 26,943 Liabilities understated by 7,593 Net assts understated by 19,350 Revenues understated by 9,313 Expenses overstated by 10,037 Criteria: It is the responsibility of the Project’s Sponsor to design and implement internal controls over financial reporting to ensure that Project’s accounts are properly recorded in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Significant adjustments that arise as a result of audit procedures that were otherwise not detected by the Project’s sponsor are required to be reported as a deficiency in internal control over financial reporting. Cause of Condition: There were errors identified in the Project’s depreciation calculations which were not identified and corrected as part of the financial close and reporting process. Amounts due from HUD for HAP requests not filed during the year were not recorded as accounts receivable. Effect of Condition: Failing to review and/or fully reconcile all of the significant accounts of the Project, may cause the financial statements to be materially misstated. Questioned Costs: None Identification of Repeat Finding: Not Applicable. Recommendation: We recommend that the Project’s sponsor review the design and implementation of internal control procedures and identify areas to strengthen the Project’s internal controls. We also recommend the Project’s sponsor ensures there is a process in place to review year-end balances to ensure all transactions have been recorded correctly. Management’s Response: The Project’s sponsor agrees with the recommendations. See Corrective Action Plan.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding 2024-001 Material Weakness in Internal Controls over Financial Reporting Statement of Condition: Numerous accounts were identified that required adjustment as part of our audit procedures, including accounts receivable -HUD and depreciation expense. Due to the number and nature of the required audit adjustments, we are considering this deficiency to be a material weakness in internal control over financial reporting. The misstatements that were discovered as a result of audit procedures would have had the following impact on the financial statements if left unadjusted: Assets understated by 26,943 Liabilities understated by 7,593 Net assts understated by 19,350 Revenues understated by 9,313 Expenses overstated by 10,037 Criteria: It is the responsibility of the Project’s Sponsor to design and implement internal controls over financial reporting to ensure that Project’s accounts are properly recorded in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Significant adjustments that arise as a result of audit procedures that were otherwise not detected by the Project’s sponsor are required to be reported as a deficiency in internal control over financial reporting. Cause of Condition: There were errors identified in the Project’s depreciation calculations which were not identified and corrected as part of the financial close and reporting process. Amounts due from HUD for HAP requests not filed during the year were not recorded as accounts receivable. Effect of Condition: Failing to review and/or fully reconcile all of the significant accounts of the Project, may cause the financial statements to be materially misstated. Questioned Costs: None Identification of Repeat Finding: Not Applicable. Recommendation: We recommend that the Project’s sponsor review the design and implementation of internal control procedures and identify areas to strengthen the Project’s internal controls. We also recommend the Project’s sponsor ensures there is a process in place to review year-end balances to ensure all transactions have been recorded correctly. Management’s Response: The Project’s sponsor agrees with the recommendations. See Corrective Action Plan.

Corrective Action Plan

A. Current Financial Statement Findings 1. Finding 2024-001 Material Weakness in Internal Controls over Financial Reporting a. Comments on the Finding and Each Recommendation. Statement of Condition: Numerous accounts were identified that required adjustment as part of our audit procedures, including accounts receivable -HUD and depreciation expense. Due to the number and nature of the required audit adjustments, we are considering this deficiency to be a material weakness in internal control over financial reporting. The misstatements that were discovered as a result of audit procedures would have had the following impact on the financial statements if left unadjusted: Assets understated by $26,943 Liabilities understated by $7,593 Net assts understated by $19,350 Revenues understated by $9,313 Expenses overstated by $10,037 Criteria: It is the responsibility of the Project’s Sponsor to design and implement internal controls over financial reporting to ensure that Project’s accounts are properly recorded in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Significant adjustments that arise as a result of audit procedures that were otherwise not detected by the Project’s sponsor are required to be reported as a deficiency in internal control over financial reporting. Cause: There were errors identified in the Project’s depreciation calculations which were not identified and corrected as part of the financial close and reporting process. Amounts due from HUD for HAP requests not filed during the year were not recorded as accounts receivable. Effect of Condition: Failing to review and/or fully reconcile all of the significant accounts of the Project, may cause the financial statements to be materially misstated. Recommendation: We recommend that the Project’s sponsor review the design and implementation of internal control procedures and identify areas to strengthen the Project’s internal controls. We also recommend the Project’s sponsor ensures there is a process in place to review year-end balances to ensure all transactions have been recorded correctly.b. Action(s) Taken or Planned on the Finding 1. The Project’s sponsor has implemented staff responsibility charts to ensure that all financial statement areas have the appropriate review and approval. 2. The Project’s sponsor is providing training to their staff on the HUD Handbook and related regulations.

About Special Tests and Provisions →
2024-002
Special Tests & Provisions
MATERIAL WEAKNESS

The Project did not request tenant assistance payments for the month of April and failed to re-submit a tenant assistance request for the month of December. Criteria: The Regulatory Agreement requires the Project to ensure controls exist to request the appropriate funds for each tenant on a monthly basis. Cause of Condition: The Project’s controls over monthly housing assistance payments were not working properly due to lack of management oversight due to turnover during the year. Effect of Condition: The Project is not in compliance with the HUD approved Regulatory Agreement. Questioned Costs: None Identification of Repeat Finding: Not Applicable Recommendation: We recommend that the Project’s sponsor review the design and implementation of internal control procedures and identify areas to strengthen management oversight. Management’s Response: The Project’s sponsor agrees with the recommendations. See Corrective Action Plan.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding 2024-002 U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Supportive Housing for Persons with Disabilities (Section 811) - Assistance Listing 14.181; Grant period - Year ended June 30, 2024 Material Noncompliance with Program Requirements Material Weakness Over Compliance: Program Administration Statement of Condition: The Project did not request tenant assistance payments for the month of April and failed to re-submit a tenant assistance request for the month of December. Criteria: The Regulatory Agreement requires the Project to ensure controls exist to request the appropriate funds for each tenant on a monthly basis. Cause of Condition: The Project’s controls over monthly housing assistance payments were not working properly due to lack of management oversight due to turnover during the year. Effect of Condition: The Project is not in compliance with the HUD approved Regulatory Agreement. Questioned Costs: None Identification of Repeat Finding: Not Applicable Recommendation: We recommend that the Project’s sponsor review the design and implementation of internal control procedures and identify areas to strengthen management oversight. Management’s Response: The Project’s sponsor agrees with the recommendations. See Corrective Action Plan.

Corrective Action Plan

B. Current Findings on the Schedule of Findings, Questioned Costs, and Recommendations. 1. Finding 2024-002 U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Supportive Housing for Persons with Disabilities (Section 811) – CFDA 14.181; Grant period – Year ended June 30, 2024 a. Comments on the Finding and Each Recommendation. Statement of Condition: The Project did not request tenant assistance payments for the month of April and failed to re-submit a tenant assistance request for the month of December. Criteria: The Regulatory Agreement requires the Project to ensure controls exist to request the appropriate funds for each tenant on a monthly basis. Cause: The Project’s controls over monthly housing assistance payments were not working properly due to lack of management oversight due to turnover during the year. Effect of Condition: The Project is not in compliance with the HUD approved Regulatory Agreement. Recommendation: We recommend that the Project’s sponsor review the design and implementation of internal control procedures and identify areas to strengthen management oversight oversight. b. Action(s) Taken or Planned on the Finding 1. The Project’s sponsor is aware of the requirements of the HUD Regulatory Agreement and is working with new staff to ensure they receive the proper training on HUD requirements. 2. In August 2024, the April 2024 HAP requests were submitted for payment.

About Special Tests and Provisions →
2024-003
Special Tests & Provisions
QUESTIONED COSTS

The Project paid management fees of 104 in excess of the amount approved by HUD. Criteria: The HUD approved management agent certification (Form HUD - 9839-B) provides for payment of management fees equal to 9.13% of residential income collected. Cause of Condition: The Project’s sponsor inadvertently utilized incorrect residential income to calculate management fees. Effect of Condition: The Project is not in compliance with the HUD approved management agent certification and Section 811 Regulatory Agreement. Questioned Costs: 104 Identification of Repeat Finding: Not Applicable Recommendation: We recommend that the Project’s sponsor verify, monthly, the residual income used to calculate management fees. Management’s Response: The Project’s sponsor agrees with the recommendations. See Corrective Action Plan.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding 2024-003 U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Supportive Housing for Persons with Disabilities (Section 811) - Assistance Listing 14.181; Grant period - Year ended June 30, 2024 Material Noncompliance with Program Requirements Significant Deficiency Over Compliance: Unauthorized Management Fees Statement of Condition: The Project paid management fees of 104 in excess of the amount approved by HUD. Criteria: The HUD approved management agent certification (Form HUD - 9839-B) provides for payment of management fees equal to 9.13% of residential income collected. Cause of Condition: The Project’s sponsor inadvertently utilized incorrect residential income to calculate management fees. Effect of Condition: The Project is not in compliance with the HUD approved management agent certification and Section 811 Regulatory Agreement. Questioned Costs: 104 Identification of Repeat Finding: Not Applicable Recommendation: We recommend that the Project’s sponsor verify, monthly, the residual income used to calculate management fees. Management’s Response: The Project’s sponsor agrees with the recommendations. See Corrective Action Plan.

Corrective Action Plan

2. Finding 2024-003 U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Supportive Housing for Persons with Disabilities (Section 811) – CFDA 14.181; Grant period – Year ended June 30, 2024 a. Comments on the Finding and Each Recommendation. Statement of Condition: The Project paid management fees of $104 in excess of the amount approved by HUD.Criteria: The HUD approved management agent certification (Form HUD - 9839-B) provides for payment of management fees equal to 9.13% of residential income collected. Cause: The Project’s sponsor inadvertently utilized incorrect residential income to calculate management fees. Effect of Condition: The Project is not in compliance with the HUD approved management agent certification and Section 811 Regulatory Agreement. Recommendation: We recommend that the Project’s sponsor verify, monthly, the residual income used to calculate management fees. b. Action(s) Taken or Planned on the Finding 1. The Project’s sponsor is aware of the requirements of the HUD Regulatory Agreement and is working with new staff to ensure they receive the proper training on HUD requirements.

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2023-06-30

FAC accepted this audit on January 18, 2024 — management decision was due July 18, 2024.

2023-001
Special Tests & Provisions
REPEAT

Security deposits were not placed into a segregated account. Criteria: The HUD Handbook 4350.3 Occupancy Requirements of Subsidized Multifamily Housing Programs requires that the owner must place security deposits in a segregated, interest bearingaccount, the balance of which must at all times be equal to the total amount collected from the eligible family plus any accrued interest. Cause of Condition: The Project’s sponsor and management company experienced turnover in their accounting department during the year which caused a shift in assigned duties and responsibilities. During that shift in assigned duties there was a lapse in assigned responsibility for the reconciliation and transfer of security deposits. Effect of Condition: This condition resulted in required security deposits not being transferred to a segregated account causing the balance to be unequal to the amount collected from eligible families. Identification of Repeat Finding: This finding is a repeat finding of Finding 2022-001 reported in the audit for the year ended June 30, 2022. Recommendation: We recommend that the Project’s sponsor verify, on a monthly basis, the required security deposit asset and liability account equal. Management’s Response: The Project’s sponsor is aware of the requirement to move eligible family deposits into a segregated account and are working with the accounting staff to ensure that the proper transfers are completed in the future. In July 2023, the security deposits were reconciled and the correct amount was transferred to a segregated account equaling the amount collected from eligible families.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding 2023-001 U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Supportive Housing for Persons with Disabilities (Section 811) – Assistance Listing 14.181; Grant period – Year ended June 30, 2023 Material Noncompliance with Program Requirements Significant Deficiency Over Compliance: Special Tests and Provisions Statement of Condition: Security deposits were not placed into a segregated account. Criteria: The HUD Handbook 4350.3 Occupancy Requirements of Subsidized Multifamily Housing Programs requires that the owner must place security deposits in a segregated, interest bearingaccount, the balance of which must at all times be equal to the total amount collected from the eligible family plus any accrued interest. Cause of Condition: The Project’s sponsor and management company experienced turnover in their accounting department during the year which caused a shift in assigned duties and responsibilities. During that shift in assigned duties there was a lapse in assigned responsibility for the reconciliation and transfer of security deposits. Effect of Condition: This condition resulted in required security deposits not being transferred to a segregated account causing the balance to be unequal to the amount collected from eligible families. Identification of Repeat Finding: This finding is a repeat finding of Finding 2022-001 reported in the audit for the year ended June 30, 2022. Recommendation: We recommend that the Project’s sponsor verify, on a monthly basis, the required security deposit asset and liability account equal. Management’s Response: The Project’s sponsor is aware of the requirement to move eligible family deposits into a segregated account and are working with the accounting staff to ensure that the proper transfers are completed in the future. In July 2023, the security deposits were reconciled and the correct amount was transferred to a segregated account equaling the amount collected from eligible families.

Corrective Action Plan

Wood County Village, Inc. HUD Project No. 042-HD044 Audit Firm: GBQ Partners LLC Audit Period: 07/1/22-06/30/23 CAP Prepared by: Donna Jablonski, CEO A. Current Findings on the Schedule of Findings, Questioned Costs, and Recommendations. 1. Finding 2023-001 U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Supportive Housing for Persons with Disabilities (Section 811) – CFDA 14.181; Grant period – Year ended June 30, 2023 a. Comments on the Finding and Each Recommendation. Statement of Condition: Security deposits were not placed into a segregated account. Criteria: The HUD Handbook 4350.3 Occupancy Requirements of Subsidized Multifamily Housing Programs requires that the owner must place security deposits in a segregated, interest bearing-account, the balance of which must at all times be equal to the total amount collected from the eligible family plus any accrued interest. Cause: The Project’s sponsor and management company experienced turnover in their accounting department during the year which caused a shift in assigned duties and responsibilities. During that shift in assigned duties there was a lapse in assigned responsibility for the transfer of security deposits. Effect of Condition: This condition resulted in required deposits not being transferred to a segregated account causing the balance to be unequal to the amount collected from the eligible family. Recommendation: We recommend that the Project’s sponsor verify, on a monthly basis, the required security deposit asset and liability account equal. b. Action(s) Taken or Planned on the Finding 1. The Project’s sponsor is aware of the requirement to move eligible family deposits into a segregated account and are working with new accounting staff to ensure that the proper transfers are completed in the future. 2. In July 2023, the security deposits were transferred to a segregated account equaling the amount collected from the eligible family.

Prior Finding References

2022-001

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2022-06-30

FAC accepted this audit on January 8, 2023 — management decision was due July 8, 2023.

2022-001
Special Tests & Provisions

Security deposits were not placed into a segregated account. Criteria: The HUD Handbook 4350.3 Occupancy Requirements of Subsidized Multifamily Housing Programs requires that the owner must place security deposits in a segregated, interest bearing-account, the balance of which must at all times be equal to the total amount collected from the eligible family plus any accrued interest. Cause of Condition: The Project?s sponsor and management company experienced turnover in their accounting department during the year which caused a shift in assigned duties and responsibilities. During that shift in assigned duties there was a lapse in assigned responsibility for the transfer of security deposits. Effect of Condition: This condition resulted in required security deposits not being transferred to a segregated account causing the balance to be unequal to the amount collected from the eligible family. Identification of Repeat Finding: This finding is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that the Project?s sponsor verify, on a monthly basis, the required security deposit asset and liability account equal. Management?s Response: The Project?s sponsor is aware of the requirement to move eligible family deposits into a segregated account and are working with the new accounting staff to ensure that the proper transfers are completed in the future. in September 2022, the security deposits were transferred to a segregated account equaling the amount collected from the eligible family.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding 2022-001 U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Supportive Housing for Persons with Disabilities (Section 811) ? Assistance Listing 14.181; Grant period ? Year ended June 30, 2022 Material Noncompliance with Program Requirements Significant Deficiency Over Compliance Statement of Condition: Security deposits were not placed into a segregated account. Criteria: The HUD Handbook 4350.3 Occupancy Requirements of Subsidized Multifamily Housing Programs requires that the owner must place security deposits in a segregated, interest bearing-account, the balance of which must at all times be equal to the total amount collected from the eligible family plus any accrued interest. Cause of Condition: The Project?s sponsor and management company experienced turnover in their accounting department during the year which caused a shift in assigned duties and responsibilities. During that shift in assigned duties there was a lapse in assigned responsibility for the transfer of security deposits. Effect of Condition: This condition resulted in required security deposits not being transferred to a segregated account causing the balance to be unequal to the amount collected from the eligible family. Identification of Repeat Finding: This finding is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that the Project?s sponsor verify, on a monthly basis, the required security deposit asset and liability account equal. Management?s Response: The Project?s sponsor is aware of the requirement to move eligible family deposits into a segregated account and are working with the new accounting staff to ensure that the proper transfers are completed in the future. in September 2022, the security deposits were transferred to a segregated account equaling the amount collected from the eligible family.

Corrective Action Plan

Wood County Village, Inc. HUD Project No. 042-HD044 Audit Firm: GBQ Partners LLC Audit Period: 07/1/21-06/30/22 CAP Prepared by: Ryan Gailbreath 419-725-8608 A. Current Findings on the Schedule of Findings, Questioned Costs, and Recommendations. 1. Finding 2022-001 U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Supportive Housing for Persons with Disabilities (Section 811) ? CFDA 14.181; Grant period ? Year ended June 30, 2022 a. Comments on the Finding and Each Recommendation. Statement of Condition: Security deposits were not placed into a segregated account. Criteria: The HUD Handbook 4350.3 Occupancy Requirements of Subsidized Multifamily Housing Programs requires that the owner must place security deposits in a segregated, interest bearing-account, the balance of which must at all times be equal to the total amount collected from the eligible family plus any accrued interest. Cause: The Project?s sponsor and management company experienced turnover in their accounting department during the year which caused a shift in assigned duties and responsibilities. During that shift in assigned duties there was a lapse in assigned responsibility for the transfer of security deposits. Effect of Condition: This condition resulted in required deposits not being transferred to a segregated account causing the balance to be unequal to the amount collected from the eligible family. Recommendation: We recommend that the Project?s sponsor verify, on a monthly basis, the required security deposit asset and liability account equal. b. Action(s) Taken or Planned on the Finding 1. The Project?s sponsor is aware of the requirement to move eligible family deposits into a segregated account and are working with new accounting staff to ensure that the proper transfers are completed in the future. 2. In September 2022, the security deposits were transferred to a segregated account equaling the amount collected from the eligible family.

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2018-06-30

FAC accepted this audit on November 8, 2018 — management decision was due May 8, 2019.

2018-001
Special Tests & Provisions
MATERIAL WEAKNESS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Special Tests and Provisions →

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and compliance status.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.