Alpha Tower

EIN: 341803445

UEI: YLKGALB5MJY5

Data as of August 21, 2026

Alpha Tower9 audit years11 findings3 repeat
9
Audit Years
11
Total Findings
3
Repeat Findings

FY 2024-12-31

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on September 29, 2025. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by March 29, 2026 (146 days ago).

What is a management decision? →
2024-004
Eligibility
MATERIAL WEAKNESSREPEATQUESTIONED COSTS

Corrected going forward and reviewing discrepancies.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Corrected going forward and reviewing discrepancies.

Corrective Action Plan

Corrected going forward and reviewing discrepancies.

Prior Finding References

2023-002

About Eligibility →
2024-005
Special Tests & Provisions

The additional deposit was made 3/24/25.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

The additional deposit was made 3/24/25.

Corrective Action Plan

The additional deposit was made 3/24/25.

About Special Tests and Provisions →
2024-006
Special Tests & Provisions
MATERIAL WEAKNESS

Corrected going forward.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Corrected going forward.

Corrective Action Plan

Corrected going forward.

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2023-12-31

FAC accepted this audit on September 30, 2024 — management decision was due March 30, 2025.

2023-001
Cost Allowability

Reconciling previous payrolls to actual.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Reconciling previous payrolls to actual.

Corrective Action Plan

Reconciling previous payrolls to actual.

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →
2023-002
Eligibility
QUESTIONED COSTS

Remind staff to follow tenant procedure manual to sure all document’s are included.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Remind staff to follow tenant procedure manual to sure all document’s are included.

Corrective Action Plan

Remind staff to follow tenant procedure manual to sure all document’s are included.

About Eligibility →

FY 2022-12-31

FAC accepted this audit on September 26, 2023 — management decision was due March 26, 2024.

2022-001
Other

The Operating bank account was not reconciled in a timely manner, for the month of December 31, 2022. Criteria: Bank reconciliations should be prepared at the end of each month, for each checking account and agreed to the general ledger. In addition, the cash balance maintained in general ledger, should be monitored, prior to the issuance of checks. Cause: Transfer of cash from the savings account, was not processed prior to December 31, 2022. Effect: The cash balance maintained in the general ledger for the operating account, was overdrawn by $29,628 as of December 31, 2022. Recommendation: I recommend that bank reconciliation should be reconciled to the general ledger on a monthly basis and cash balance maintained in general ledger, should be monitored, prior to the issuance of checks. Performing these procedures will reduce the risk of an overdrawn or overstated bank balance, during the fiscal year. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Has been corrected.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2022-001 U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development 14.195 - Section 8 Housing Assistance Bank Reconciliation Condition: The Operating bank account was not reconciled in a timely manner, for the month of December 31, 2022. Criteria: Bank reconciliations should be prepared at the end of each month, for each checking account and agreed to the general ledger. In addition, the cash balance maintained in general ledger, should be monitored, prior to the issuance of checks. Cause: Transfer of cash from the savings account, was not processed prior to December 31, 2022. Effect: The cash balance maintained in the general ledger for the operating account, was overdrawn by $29,628 as of December 31, 2022. Recommendation: I recommend that bank reconciliation should be reconciled to the general ledger on a monthly basis and cash balance maintained in general ledger, should be monitored, prior to the issuance of checks. Performing these procedures will reduce the risk of an overdrawn or overstated bank balance, during the fiscal year. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Has been corrected.

Corrective Action Plan

1. Current Findings on the Schedule of Finding and Recommendation a. Finding 2022-001. Bank Reconciliation The Operating bank account was not reconciled in a timely manner, for the month of December 31, 2022. The cash balance maintained in the general ledger for the operating account, was overdrawn by $29,628 as of December 31, 2022. (1) Comments on the Finding and Each Recommendation. Management concurs with the finding and the auditor?s recommendation that the that bank reconciliation should be reconciled to the general ledger on a monthly basis and cash balance maintained in general ledger, should be monitored, prior to the issuance of checks. Performing these procedures will reduce the risk of an overdrawn or overstated bank balance, during the fiscal year. (2) Actions Taken on the Finding. Has been corrected.

About Other →
2022-002
Eligibility
REPEAT

Move-ins: 1. In one (1) instance out of seven (7) tenant files tested, Form HUD-50059 was not signed by the tenant. 2. In one (1) instance out of seven (7) tenant files tested, Form HUD-50059 was not signed by management. 3. In one (1) instance out of seven (7) tenant files tested, the ?Notice and Consent for the Release of Information? (Form 9887), was not maintained in the tenant?s file. 4. In one (1) instance out of seven (7) tenant files tested, the ?Applicant?s/Tenant?s Consent for the Release of Information (Form 9887-A), was not maintained in the tenant?s file. Recertification: 1. In one (1) instance out of nineteen (19) tenant files tested, the Pension benefit per the Form HUD-50059 was $486 per month; however, the supporting documentation was for $493 per month. 2. In one (1) instance out of nineteen (19) tenant files tested, there was no supporting documentation, to support the Federal wage income of $9,360. 3. In five (5) instances out of nineteen (19) tenant files tested, the Lease Amendment form was not signed by management. 4. In one (1) instance out of nineteen (19) tenant files tested, the ?Initial Notice ? Section 202/8 or Section 202 PACs?, was not signed by the tenant. 5. In one (1) instance out of nineteen (19) tenant files tested, the ?Initial Notice ? Section 202/8 or Section 202 PACs?, did not have a witness signature. Move-out: 1. In one (1) instance out of four (4) tenant files tested, the security deposit was not refunded within the 30 day timeframe. Criteria: HUD 4350.3, REV-1, Change 4, Ch. 5, 5-12.B. Timeframe for Conducting Verifications. Verifications should be conducted at the following three times. 1. Owners must verify income, assets, expenses, and deductions and all eligibility requirements prior to move-in. 2. Owners must verify each family?s income, assets, expenses, and deductions as part of the annual recertification process. 3. Owners must verify changes in income, allowances, or family characteristics reported between annual recertification. 29 HUD Handbook 4350.3, Rev 1, Change 4, Ch. 5, 5-31, F. In all cases, the computer generated HUD-50059 must include the required tenant signatures and owner signatures prior to submitting the data to the Contract Administrator or HUD. The owner must document within the file why the signature(s) was not obtained and, if applicable, when the signature(s) will be obtained. 24 CFR ?891.400(b): The Owner is responsible for all management functions. These functions include selection and admission of tenants, required reexaminations of incomes for households occupying assisted units or residential spaces, collection of tenant payments, termination of tenancy and eviction. HUD Handbook 4350.3, REV-1, Change 4, Ch 6 6-18 C. Within 30 days after the move-out date (or shorter time if required by state and/or local laws), the owner must either: 1. Refund the full security deposit plus accrued interest to a tenant that does not owe any amounts under the lease; or 2. Provide the tenant with an itemized list of any unpaid rent, damages to the unit, and an estimated cost for repair, along with a statement of the tenant?s rights under state and local laws. In addition, prior to the tenant occupying the unit the following procedures should be performed: 1. Obtain the tenant?s signature on the Notice and Consent for the Release of Information (Form 9887) and maintained the document in the tenant?s file. 2. The management agent should sign the Applicant's/Tenant's Consent to the Release of Information (Form 9887-A), in addition to obtaining the tenant signature, and maintain the document in the tenant?s file. 3. The management agent must determine the tenant?s rent based on the proper verification of the tenant?s income. Effect: The tenant files were not always in compliance with the guidelines established by the Department of Housing and Urban Development. Cause: Required documents were not always maintained in the tenant file, in addition to being properly authorized by the tenant and/or owner. Context: Tenant files tested consisted of move-ins, recertifications and move-outs. Population Size Number: 149 Tenants Files. Dollar Amount: $ 1,740,415. Sample Number: 30 Tenants Files. Dollar Amount: $ 350,419. Items Not in Compliance Number: 10 Tenant Files. Dollar Amount: $ 116,806. Questioned Costs There was no questioned costs. Recommendation: In order to be in compliance with guidelines established by the Department of Housing and Urban Development, I recommend that Alpha Tower process applicants and tenants, including recertification of tenants in accordance with guidelines established by the Department of Housing and Urban Development prior to the tenant occupying the unit. In addition, security deposits should be refunded with interest, within 30-day after the effective move-out date. By performing these procedures, the risk of incurring questioned costs will be significantly reduced. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Corrected going forward.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2022-002 U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development 14.195 - Section 8 Housing Assistance Condition: Move-ins: 1. In one (1) instance out of seven (7) tenant files tested, Form HUD-50059 was not signed by the tenant. 2. In one (1) instance out of seven (7) tenant files tested, Form HUD-50059 was not signed by management. 3. In one (1) instance out of seven (7) tenant files tested, the ?Notice and Consent for the Release of Information? (Form 9887), was not maintained in the tenant?s file. 4. In one (1) instance out of seven (7) tenant files tested, the ?Applicant?s/Tenant?s Consent for the Release of Information (Form 9887-A), was not maintained in the tenant?s file. Recertification: 1. In one (1) instance out of nineteen (19) tenant files tested, the Pension benefit per the Form HUD-50059 was $486 per month; however, the supporting documentation was for $493 per month. 2. In one (1) instance out of nineteen (19) tenant files tested, there was no supporting documentation, to support the Federal wage income of $9,360. 3. In five (5) instances out of nineteen (19) tenant files tested, the Lease Amendment form was not signed by management. 4. In one (1) instance out of nineteen (19) tenant files tested, the ?Initial Notice ? Section 202/8 or Section 202 PACs?, was not signed by the tenant. 5. In one (1) instance out of nineteen (19) tenant files tested, the ?Initial Notice ? Section 202/8 or Section 202 PACs?, did not have a witness signature. Move-out: 1. In one (1) instance out of four (4) tenant files tested, the security deposit was not refunded within the 30 day timeframe. Criteria: HUD 4350.3, REV-1, Change 4, Ch. 5, 5-12.B. Timeframe for Conducting Verifications. Verifications should be conducted at the following three times. 1. Owners must verify income, assets, expenses, and deductions and all eligibility requirements prior to move-in. 2. Owners must verify each family?s income, assets, expenses, and deductions as part of the annual recertification process. 3. Owners must verify changes in income, allowances, or family characteristics reported between annual recertification. 29 HUD Handbook 4350.3, Rev 1, Change 4, Ch. 5, 5-31, F. In all cases, the computer generated HUD-50059 must include the required tenant signatures and owner signatures prior to submitting the data to the Contract Administrator or HUD. The owner must document within the file why the signature(s) was not obtained and, if applicable, when the signature(s) will be obtained. 24 CFR ?891.400(b): The Owner is responsible for all management functions. These functions include selection and admission of tenants, required reexaminations of incomes for households occupying assisted units or residential spaces, collection of tenant payments, termination of tenancy and eviction. HUD Handbook 4350.3, REV-1, Change 4, Ch 6 6-18 C. Within 30 days after the move-out date (or shorter time if required by state and/or local laws), the owner must either: 1. Refund the full security deposit plus accrued interest to a tenant that does not owe any amounts under the lease; or 2. Provide the tenant with an itemized list of any unpaid rent, damages to the unit, and an estimated cost for repair, along with a statement of the tenant?s rights under state and local laws. In addition, prior to the tenant occupying the unit the following procedures should be performed: 1. Obtain the tenant?s signature on the Notice and Consent for the Release of Information (Form 9887) and maintained the document in the tenant?s file. 2. The management agent should sign the Applicant's/Tenant's Consent to the Release of Information (Form 9887-A), in addition to obtaining the tenant signature, and maintain the document in the tenant?s file. 3. The management agent must determine the tenant?s rent based on the proper verification of the tenant?s income. Effect: The tenant files were not always in compliance with the guidelines established by the Department of Housing and Urban Development. Cause: Required documents were not always maintained in the tenant file, in addition to being properly authorized by the tenant and/or owner. Context: Tenant files tested consisted of move-ins, recertifications and move-outs. Population Size Number: 149 Tenants Files. Dollar Amount: $ 1,740,415. Sample Number: 30 Tenants Files. Dollar Amount: $ 350,419. Items Not in Compliance Number: 10 Tenant Files. Dollar Amount: $ 116,806. Questioned Costs There was no questioned costs. Recommendation: In order to be in compliance with guidelines established by the Department of Housing and Urban Development, I recommend that Alpha Tower process applicants and tenants, including recertification of tenants in accordance with guidelines established by the Department of Housing and Urban Development prior to the tenant occupying the unit. In addition, security deposits should be refunded with interest, within 30-day after the effective move-out date. By performing these procedures, the risk of incurring questioned costs will be significantly reduced. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Corrected going forward.

Corrective Action Plan

b. Finding 2022-002. Tenant Files Move-ins: 1. In one (1) instance out of seven (7) tenant files tested, Form HUD-50059 was not signed by the tenant. 2. In one (1) instance out of seven (7) tenant files tested, Form HUD-50059 was not signed by management. 3. In one (1) instance out of seven (7) tenant files tested, the ?Notice and Consent for the Release of Information? (Form 9887), was not maintained in the tenant?s file. 4. In one (1) instance out of seven (7) tenant files tested, the ?Applicant?s/Tenant?s Consent for the Release of Information (Form 9887-A), was not maintained in the tenant?s file. Recertification: 1. In one (1) instance out of nineteen (19) tenant files tested, the Pension benefit per the Form HUD-50059 was $486 per month; however, the supporting documentation was for $493 per month. 2. In one (1) instance out of nineteen (19) tenant files tested, there was no supporting documentation, to support the Federal wage income of $9,360. 3. In five (5) instances out of nineteen (19) tenant files tested, the Lease Amendment form was not signed by management. 4. In one (1) instance out of nineteen (19) tenant files tested, the ?Initial Notice ? Section 202/8 or Section 202 PACs?, was not signed by the tenant. 5. In one (1) instance out of nineteen (19) tenant files tested, the ?Initial Notice ? Section 202/8 or Section 202 PACs?, did not have a witness signature. Move-out: 1. In one (1) instance out of four (4) tenant files tested, the security deposit was not refunded within the 30 day timeframe. (1) Comments on the Finding and Each Recommendation. Management concurs with the finding and the auditor?s recommendation that Alpha Tower process applicants and tenants, including recertification of tenants in accordance with guidelines established by the Department of Housing and Urban Development prior to the tenant occupying the unit. In addition, security deposits should be refunded with interest, within 30-day after the effective move-out date. (2) Actions Taken on the Finding. Corrected going forward.

Prior Finding References

2021-001

About Eligibility →

FY 2021-12-31

FAC accepted this audit on October 2, 2022 — management decision was due April 2, 2023.

2021-001
Other
REPEAT

Move-ins: 1. In two (2) instances out of fourteen (14) tenant files tested, the security deposit amount per the lease agreement did not agree to the security deposit agreement. 2. In two (2) instances out of fourteen (14) tenant files tested, the social security card was not maintained in the tenant's file. 3. In eight (8) instances out of fourteen (14) tenant files tested, the tenant application was not stamped dated by the management agent. 4. In four (4) instances out of fourteen (14) tenant files tested, the income used to determine the tenant?s monthly rent was based on the income documentation provided by the tenant. 5. In one (1) instance out of fourteen (14) tenant files tested, the Notice and Consent for the Release of Information (Form 9887) was signed by the tenant. 6. In (1) instance out of fourteen (14) tenant files tested, the Notice and Consent for the Release of Information (Form 9887) was not maintained in the tenant's file. 7. In one (1) instance out of fourteen (14) tenant files tested, the HUD Form-50059 was not signed by the tenant. 8. In two (2) instances out of fourteen (14) tenant files tested, the Applicant's/Tenant's Consent to the Release of Information (Form 9887-A) was not signed by the landlord. 9. In one (1) instance out of fourteen (14) tenant files tested, the Applicant's/Tenant's Consent to the Release of Information (Form 9887-A) was not maintained in the tenant's file. 10. In three (3) instances out of fourteen (14) tenant files tested, the effective date of the HUD Form-50059 did not agree to the commencement date on the lease agreement. 11. In four (4) instances out of fourteen (14) tenant files tested, the Lease Addendum, for Violence Against Women and Justice Department Reauthorization Act of 2005, was not signed by the landlord. Recertification: 1. In two (2) instances out of thirteen (13) tenant files tested, the lease amendment was not signed by the landlord. Move-outs: 1. In three (3) instances out of three (3) tenant files tested, the security deposit was refunded without interest. Criteria: HUD 4350.3, REV-1, Change 4, Ch. 5, 5-12.B. Timeframe for Conducting Verifications. Verifications should be conducted at the following three times. 1. Owners must verify income, assets, expenses, and deductions and all eligibility requirements prior to move-in. 2. Owners must verify each family?s income, assets, expenses, and deductions as part of the annual recertification process. 3. Owners must verify changes in income, allowances, or family characteristics reported between annual recertification. HUD Handbook 4350.3, Rev 1, Change 4, Ch. 5, 5-31, F. In all cases, the computer generated HUD-50059 must include the required tenant signatures and owner signatures prior to submitting the data to the Contract Administrator or HUD. The owner must document within the file why the signature(s) was not obtained and, if applicable, when the signature(s) will be obtained. 24 CFR ?891.400(b): The Owner is responsible for all management functions. These functions include selection and admission of tenants, required reexaminations of incomes for households occupying assisted units or residential spaces, collection of tenant payments, termination of tenancy and eviction. HUD 4350.3 REV-1, Change 4, Ch. 6: 6-29.A. Owners perform unit inspections on at least an annual basis to determine whether the appliances and equipment in the unit are functioning properly and to assess whether a component needs to be repaired or replaced. This is also an opportunity to determine any damage to the unit caused by the tenant's abuse or negligence and, if so, make the necessary repairs and bill the tenant for the cost of the repairs. HUD Handbook 4350.3, REV-1, Change 4, Ch 6 6-18 C. Within 30 days after the move-out date (or shorter time if required by state and/or local laws), the owner must either: 1. Refund the full security deposit plus accrued interest to a tenant that does not owe any amounts under the lease; or 2. Provide the tenant with an itemized list of any unpaid rent, damages to the unit, and an estimated cost for repair, along with a statement of the tenant?s rights under state and local laws. In addition, prior to the tenant occupying the unit the following procedures should be performed: 1. The security deposit amount per the lease agreement should agree to the security deposit agreement. 2. Obtain the tenant?s social security card. 3. Date stamp the tenant application. 4. Obtain the tenant?s signature on the Notice and Consent for the Release of Information (Form 9887) and maintained the document in the tenant?s file. 5. The management agent should sign the Applicant's/Tenant's Consent to the Release of Information (Form 9887-A), in addition to obtaining the tenant signature, and maintain the document in the tenant?s file. 6. The management agent should verify that the effective date of the 50059 agrees with the date on the lease agreement. 7. The management agent should sign the Lease Addendum, for Violence Against Women and Justice Department Reauthorization Act of 2005, in addition to obtaining the tenant signature, and maintain the document in the tenant?s file. 8. The management agent must determine the tenant?s rent based on the proper verification of the tenant?s income. Effect: The tenant files were not always in compliance with the guidelines established by the Department of Housing and Urban Development. Cause: Required documents were not always maintained in the tenant file, in addition to being properly authorized by the tenant and/or owner. Context: Tenant files tested consisted of move-ins, recertifications and move-outs. Population Size Number: 149 Tenants Files. Dollar Amount: $ 2,352,052. Sample Number: 30 Tenants Files. Dollar Amount: $ 439,032. Items Not in Compliance Number: 17 Tenant Files. Dollar Amount: $ 65.60. Questioned Costs There was no questioned costs. Recommendation: In order to be in compliance with guidelines established by the Department of Housing and Urban Development, I recommend that Alpha Tower process applicants and tenants, including recertification of tenants in accordance with guidelines established by the Department of Housing and Urban Development prior to the tenant occupying the unit. In addition, security deposits should be refunded with interest, within 30-day after the effective move-out date. By performing these procedures, the risk of incurring questioned costs will be significantly reduced. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: New manager hired and upgraded review process. All files corrected.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Move-ins: 1. In two (2) instances out of fourteen (14) tenant files tested, the security deposit amount per the lease agreement did not agree to the security deposit agreement. 2. In two (2) instances out of fourteen (14) tenant files tested, the social security card was not maintained in the tenant's file. 3. In eight (8) instances out of fourteen (14) tenant files tested, the tenant application was not stamped dated by the management agent. 4. In four (4) instances out of fourteen (14) tenant files tested, the income used to determine the tenant?s monthly rent was based on the income documentation provided by the tenant. 5. In one (1) instance out of fourteen (14) tenant files tested, the Notice and Consent for the Release of Information (Form 9887) was signed by the tenant. 6. In (1) instance out of fourteen (14) tenant files tested, the Notice and Consent for the Release of Information (Form 9887) was not maintained in the tenant's file. 7. In one (1) instance out of fourteen (14) tenant files tested, the HUD Form-50059 was not signed by the tenant. 8. In two (2) instances out of fourteen (14) tenant files tested, the Applicant's/Tenant's Consent to the Release of Information (Form 9887-A) was not signed by the landlord. 9. In one (1) instance out of fourteen (14) tenant files tested, the Applicant's/Tenant's Consent to the Release of Information (Form 9887-A) was not maintained in the tenant's file. 10. In three (3) instances out of fourteen (14) tenant files tested, the effective date of the HUD Form-50059 did not agree to the commencement date on the lease agreement. 11. In four (4) instances out of fourteen (14) tenant files tested, the Lease Addendum, for Violence Against Women and Justice Department Reauthorization Act of 2005, was not signed by the landlord. Recertification: 1. In two (2) instances out of thirteen (13) tenant files tested, the lease amendment was not signed by the landlord. Move-outs: 1. In three (3) instances out of three (3) tenant files tested, the security deposit was refunded without interest. Criteria: HUD 4350.3, REV-1, Change 4, Ch. 5, 5-12.B. Timeframe for Conducting Verifications. Verifications should be conducted at the following three times. 1. Owners must verify income, assets, expenses, and deductions and all eligibility requirements prior to move-in. 2. Owners must verify each family?s income, assets, expenses, and deductions as part of the annual recertification process. 3. Owners must verify changes in income, allowances, or family characteristics reported between annual recertification. HUD Handbook 4350.3, Rev 1, Change 4, Ch. 5, 5-31, F. In all cases, the computer generated HUD-50059 must include the required tenant signatures and owner signatures prior to submitting the data to the Contract Administrator or HUD. The owner must document within the file why the signature(s) was not obtained and, if applicable, when the signature(s) will be obtained. 24 CFR ?891.400(b): The Owner is responsible for all management functions. These functions include selection and admission of tenants, required reexaminations of incomes for households occupying assisted units or residential spaces, collection of tenant payments, termination of tenancy and eviction. HUD 4350.3 REV-1, Change 4, Ch. 6: 6-29.A. Owners perform unit inspections on at least an annual basis to determine whether the appliances and equipment in the unit are functioning properly and to assess whether a component needs to be repaired or replaced. This is also an opportunity to determine any damage to the unit caused by the tenant's abuse or negligence and, if so, make the necessary repairs and bill the tenant for the cost of the repairs. HUD Handbook 4350.3, REV-1, Change 4, Ch 6 6-18 C. Within 30 days after the move-out date (or shorter time if required by state and/or local laws), the owner must either: 1. Refund the full security deposit plus accrued interest to a tenant that does not owe any amounts under the lease; or 2. Provide the tenant with an itemized list of any unpaid rent, damages to the unit, and an estimated cost for repair, along with a statement of the tenant?s rights under state and local laws. In addition, prior to the tenant occupying the unit the following procedures should be performed: 1. The security deposit amount per the lease agreement should agree to the security deposit agreement. 2. Obtain the tenant?s social security card. 3. Date stamp the tenant application. 4. Obtain the tenant?s signature on the Notice and Consent for the Release of Information (Form 9887) and maintained the document in the tenant?s file. 5. The management agent should sign the Applicant's/Tenant's Consent to the Release of Information (Form 9887-A), in addition to obtaining the tenant signature, and maintain the document in the tenant?s file. 6. The management agent should verify that the effective date of the 50059 agrees with the date on the lease agreement. 7. The management agent should sign the Lease Addendum, for Violence Against Women and Justice Department Reauthorization Act of 2005, in addition to obtaining the tenant signature, and maintain the document in the tenant?s file. 8. The management agent must determine the tenant?s rent based on the proper verification of the tenant?s income. Effect: The tenant files were not always in compliance with the guidelines established by the Department of Housing and Urban Development. Cause: Required documents were not always maintained in the tenant file, in addition to being properly authorized by the tenant and/or owner. Context: Tenant files tested consisted of move-ins, recertifications and move-outs. Population Size Number: 149 Tenants Files. Dollar Amount: $ 2,352,052. Sample Number: 30 Tenants Files. Dollar Amount: $ 439,032. Items Not in Compliance Number: 17 Tenant Files. Dollar Amount: $ 65.60. Questioned Costs There was no questioned costs. Recommendation: In order to be in compliance with guidelines established by the Department of Housing and Urban Development, I recommend that Alpha Tower process applicants and tenants, including recertification of tenants in accordance with guidelines established by the Department of Housing and Urban Development prior to the tenant occupying the unit. In addition, security deposits should be refunded with interest, within 30-day after the effective move-out date. By performing these procedures, the risk of incurring questioned costs will be significantly reduced. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: New manager hired and upgraded review process. All files corrected.

Corrective Action Plan

1. Current Findings on the Schedule of Finding, Questioned Cost and Recommendation a. Finding 2021-001; Section 8 Housing Assistance (CFDA # 14.195) Tenant Files Move-ins: 1. In two (2) instances out of fourteen (14) tenant files tested, the security deposit amount per the lease agreement did not agree to the security deposit agreement. 2. In two (2) instances out of fourteen (14) tenant files tested, the social security card was not maintained in the tenant's file. 3. In eight (8) instances out of fourteen (14) tenant files tested, the tenant application was not stamped dated by the management agent. 4. In four (4) instances out of fourteen (14) tenant files tested, the income used to determine the tenant?s monthly rent was based on the income documentation provided by the tenant. 5. In one (1) instance out of fourteen (14) tenant files tested, the Notice and Consent for the Release of Information (Form 9887) was signed by the tenant. 6. In (1) instance out of fourteen (14) tenant files tested, the Notice and Consent for the Release of Information (Form 9887) was not maintained in the tenant's file. 7. In one (1) instance out of fourteen (14) tenant files tested, the HUD Form-50059 was not signed by the tenant. 8. In two (2) instances out of fourteen (14) tenant files tested, the Applicant's/Tenant's Consent to the Release of Information (Form 9887-A) was not signed by the landlord. 9. In one (1) instance out of fourteen (14) tenant files tested, the Applicant's/Tenant's Consent to the Release of Information (Form 9887-A) was not maintained in the tenant's file. 10. In three (3) instances out of fourteen (14) tenant files tested, the effective date of the HUD Form-50059 did not agree to the commencement date on the lease agreement. 11. In four (4) instances out of fourteen (14) tenant files tested, the Lease Addendum, for Violence Against Women and Justice Department Reauthorization Act of 2005, was not signed by the landlord. Recertification: 1. In two (2) instances out of thirteen (13) tenant files tested, the lease amendment was not signed by the landlord. Move-outs: 1. In three (3) instances out of three (3) tenant files tested, the security deposit was refunded without interest. (1) Comments on the Finding and Each Recommendation. Management concurs with the finding and the auditor?s recommendation that Alpha Tower process applicants and tenants, including recertification of tenants in accordance with guidelines established by the Department of Housing and Urban Development prior to the tenant occupying the unit. In addition, security deposits should be refunded with interest, within 30-day after the effective move-out date. (2) Actions Taken on the Finding. New manager hired and upgraded review process. All files corrected.

Prior Finding References

2020-001

About Other →

FY 2020-12-31

FAC accepted this audit on September 13, 2021 — management decision was due March 13, 2022.

2020-001
Eligibility
QUESTIONED COSTS

There was a total of six tenant move-ins, during the 2020 calendar, I noted the following: 1. There was one instance, whereby the income reported on the HUD-50059, was not properly supported by the documentation maintained in the tenant file. Criteria: Per HUD Handbook 4350.3 REV-1, Section 3: Verification: 5-12 Verification Requirements A. 1. ?Owners must verify all income, assets, expenses, deductions, family characteristics, and circumstances that affect family eligibility or level of assistance.? Effect: Income was not properly verified, resulting in potential questioned costs of $7,055. Cause: Tenant file documents were not obtained in accordance with HUD Handbook 4350.3 REV-1, Section 3: Verification. Context: Tenant files were tested. The testing found one (1) non-compliance discrepancy. Population Size Number: 6 Tenant files. Dollar Amount: $0. Sample Number: 6 Tenant files. Dollar Amount: $0. Items Not in Compliance Number: 3 Tenant files. Dollar Amount: $0. Questioned Costs There was $7,055 in potential questioned costs. Recommendation: I recommend the verification of income in accordance with HUD Handbook 4350.3 REV-1, Section 3: Verification. By performing these procedures, the risk of questioned costs will be significantly reduced. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Signed repayment agreement with tenant.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2020-001 U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Section 8 Housing Assistance Tenant File Condition: There was a total of six tenant move-ins, during the 2020 calendar, I noted the following: 1. There was one instance, whereby the income reported on the HUD-50059, was not properly supported by the documentation maintained in the tenant file. Criteria: Per HUD Handbook 4350.3 REV-1, Section 3: Verification: 5-12 Verification Requirements A. 1. ?Owners must verify all income, assets, expenses, deductions, family characteristics, and circumstances that affect family eligibility or level of assistance.? Effect: Income was not properly verified, resulting in potential questioned costs of $7,055. Cause: Tenant file documents were not obtained in accordance with HUD Handbook 4350.3 REV-1, Section 3: Verification. Context: Tenant files were tested. The testing found one (1) non-compliance discrepancy. Population Size Number: 6 Tenant files. Dollar Amount: $0. Sample Number: 6 Tenant files. Dollar Amount: $0. Items Not in Compliance Number: 3 Tenant files. Dollar Amount: $0. Questioned Costs There was $7,055 in potential questioned costs. Recommendation: I recommend the verification of income in accordance with HUD Handbook 4350.3 REV-1, Section 3: Verification. By performing these procedures, the risk of questioned costs will be significantly reduced. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Signed repayment agreement with tenant.

Corrective Action Plan

U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Alpha Tower respectfully submits the following corrective action plan for the year ended December 31, 2020. Kevin L. Penn, Inc. 11811 Shaker Blvd., Suite 421 Cleveland, Ohio 44120 Audit Period: January 1, 2020 to December 31, 2020. The findings from the December 31, 2020 schedule of findings are discussed below. The findings are numbered consistently with the numbers assigned in the schedule. Findings ? Financial Statement Audit None Findings - Federal Award Programs Audit U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Finding 2020-001: Section 8 Housing Assistance, CFDA 14.195 Tenant File Recommendation: I recommend the verification of income in accordance with HUD Handbook 4350.3 REV-1, Section 3: Verification. By performing these procedures, the risk of questioned costs will be significantly reduced. Action Taken: Signed repayment agreement with tenant. If the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development has questions regarding this plan please call Thomas R. Fuller, Executive Director at (330) 376-8787.

About Eligibility →

FY 2018-12-31

FAC accepted this audit on July 15, 2019 — management decision was due January 15, 2020.

2018-001
Special Tests & Provisions

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Special Tests and Provisions →
2018-002
Special Tests & Provisions

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Special Tests and Provisions →

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and compliance status.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.