Tri-Township Consolidated School Corporation

EIN: 320345284

UEI: YCJ6JNFKAXT9

Data as of August 27, 2026

Tri-Township Consolidated School Corporation1 audit years2 findings
1
Audit Years
2
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings

FY 2023-06-30

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on March 26, 2024. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by September 26, 2024 (700 days ago).

What is a management decision? →
2023-003
Cost Allowability
MATERIAL WEAKNESS

The School Corporation had not established an effective internal control system related to the grant agreement and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirement. The School Corporation failed to comply with the allowable costs/cost principle requirements that employees who work 100 percent of their time on a federal award maintain semiannual certifications as required by the pass-through agency, and that employees who work on a federal award and a non-federal award have Program Activity Reports or equivalent documentation to support the distribution of their salaries or wages. Cause: The School Corporation's management had not developed an effective system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement or the compliance requirement could have resulted in the loss of federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: Six pay periods were selected for testing of payroll charges to the ESF grants during the audit period in which employees were charged 100% to the ESF grant awards. There were no Semi-Annual Certification or other supporting documentation (Personnel Activity Reports or equivalent documentation) maintained to support payroll and benefits for employees who worked 100 percent of the time on the ESF funded initiatives. Identification as a repeat finding: No. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporations' management establish controls to ensure compliance and comply with the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirement including maintaining Personnel Activity Reports, Semi-Annual Certifications, or equivalent documentation to support payroll charges allocated to federal grants. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding 2023-003 Information on the federal program: Subject: Education Stabilization Fund (ESF) – Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listing Number: 84.425D, 84.425U Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425D210013, S425U210013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Finding: Material Weakness Criteria: "Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses (1) Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: (i) Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated; (ii) Be incorporated into the official records of the non-Federal entity; (iii) Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non-Federal entity, not exceeding 100% of compensated activities . . . (vii) Support the distribution of the employee's salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award; a Federal award and non-Federal award; an indirect cost activity and a direct cost activity; two or more indirect activities which are allocated using different allocation bases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect cost activity. . . ." Indiana Department of Education Onsite Fiscal Monitoring Document - Monitoring Topic 1-Compliance with compensation for personnel services requirements, page 2 states: "Show evidence that personnel in 'split-funded' positions maintain Program Activity Reports (PAR)/Time and Effort logs and evidence that personnel paid 100% with federal funds complete accurate and timely 'Semi-Annual Certification' forms." Finding 2023-003 (Continued) Condition: The School Corporation had not established an effective internal control system related to the grant agreement and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirement. The School Corporation failed to comply with the allowable costs/cost principle requirements that employees who work 100 percent of their time on a federal award maintain semiannual certifications as required by the pass-through agency, and that employees who work on a federal award and a non-federal award have Program Activity Reports or equivalent documentation to support the distribution of their salaries or wages. Cause: The School Corporation's management had not developed an effective system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement or the compliance requirement could have resulted in the loss of federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: Six pay periods were selected for testing of payroll charges to the ESF grants during the audit period in which employees were charged 100% to the ESF grant awards. There were no Semi-Annual Certification or other supporting documentation (Personnel Activity Reports or equivalent documentation) maintained to support payroll and benefits for employees who worked 100 percent of the time on the ESF funded initiatives. Identification as a repeat finding: No. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporations' management establish controls to ensure compliance and comply with the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirement including maintaining Personnel Activity Reports, Semi-Annual Certifications, or equivalent documentation to support payroll charges allocated to federal grants. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.

Corrective Action Plan

EINPING 2023-003 Information on the federal program: Subject: Education Stabilization Fund -Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listing Number: 84.4250, 84.425U Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425D210013, S425U210013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Finding: Material Weakness Condjtjon: The School Corporation had not established an effective internal control system related to the grant agreement and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirement. The School Corporation failed to comply with the allowable costs/cost principal requirements that employees who work 100 percent of their time on a federal award maintain semiannual certifications as required by the pass-through agency, and that employees who work on a federal award and a non-federal award have Program Activity Reports or equivalent documentation to support the distribution of their salaries or wages. Context: Six pay periods were selected for testing of payroll charges to the ESF grants during the audit period in which employees were charged 100% to the ESF grant awards. There were no Semi-Annual Certification or other supporting documentation (Personnel Activity Reports or equivalent documentation) maintained to support payroll and benefits for employees who worked 100 percent of the time on the ESF funded initiatives. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and will take the following corrective action: Semi-annual certifications will be required to be completed by any employee who is paid from federal funds 100% of the time. Employees who are paid partially from federal funds will be required to complete a program activity report to support the distribution of their wages. Responsible party and timeline for completion: Dara Lee Guse Immediately

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →
2023-004
Special Tests & Provisions
MATERIAL WEAKNESS

An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Special Tests and Provisions – Wage Rate Requirements compliance requirements. The School Corporation did not include Davis Bacon wage rate requirements in its contract with vendor which includes labor. The School Corporation did not obtain the weekly payroll reports certifications from a construction company for a building project. Cause: The School Corporation's management had not developed a system of internal controls to ensure compliance with the compliance requirements listed above. Effect: The failure to design and implement an effective internal control system enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Special Tests and Provisions – Wage Rate Requirements compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: The School Corporation expended $324,887 during the audit period on an HVAC project was charged to the ESSER III grant award (84.425U). The construction contract did not include a Davis-Bacon clause prescribing federal wage rate requirements required for construction contracts. The School Corporation did not have an internal control designed to collect the weekly payroll reports certifications from the construction company and its subcontractors, as applicable, for the construction project to verify prevailing wages were being paid during the project period. Therefore, no review was performed by management to ensure that pay rates complied with the federal wage rate requirements. The construction payments represented approximately 52% of the Education Stabilization Fund disbursements reported on the SEFA for the period under audit. Identification as a repeat finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the School Corporation include Davis-Bacon wage requirements in construction contracts which are federally funded and implement a formal process to ensure the required weekly payroll report certifications are collected and reviewed by management to ensure compliance with the federal wage rate requirements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding 2023-004 Information on the federal program: Subject: Education Stabilization Fund – Special Tests and Provisions - Wage Rate Requirements Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listing Number: 84.425U Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425U210013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Special Tests and Provisions - Wage Rate Requirements Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Qualified Opinion Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 29 CFR 5.5 states in part: a. The Agency head shall cause or require the contracting officer to insert in full in any contract in excess of $2,000 which is entered into for the actual construction, alteration and/or repair, including painting and decorating, of a public building or public work, or building or work financed in whole or in part from Federal funds or in accordance with guarantees of a Federal agency or financed from funds obtained by pledge of any contract of a Federal agency to make a loan, grant or annual contribution (except where a different meaning is expressly indicated), and which is subject to the labor standards provisions of any of the acts listed in §5.1, the following clauses… (1) Minimum wages. (i) All laborers and mechanics employed or working upon the site of the work (or under the United States Housing Act of 1937 or under the Housing Act of 1949 in the construction or development of the project), will be paid unconditionally and not less often than once a week, and without subsequent deduction or rebate on any account (except such payroll deductions as are permitted by regulations issued by the Secretary of Labor under the Copeland Act (29 CFR part 3)), the full amount of wages and bona fide fringe benefits (or cash equivalents thereof) due at time of payment computed at rates not less than those contained in the wage determination of the Secretary of Labor which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, regardless of any contractual relationship which may be alleged to exist between the contractor and such laborers and mechanics… (3)(ii)(A) The contractor shall submit weekly for each week in which any contract work is performed a copy of all payrolls to the (write in name of appropriate federal agency) if the agency is a party to the contract, but if the agency is not such a party, the contractor will submit the payrolls to the applicant, sponsor, or owner, as the case may be, for transmission to the (write in name of agency). 2 CFR 200 Appendix II states in part: Finding 2023-004 (Continued) In addition to other provisions required by the Federal agency or non-Federal entity; all contracts made by the non-Federal entity under the Federal award must contain provisions covering the following, as applicable. . . . (D) Davis-Bacon Act, as amended (40 U.S.C. 3141-3148). When required by Federal program legislation, all prime construction contracts in excess of $2,000 awarded by non-Federal entities must include a provision for compliance with the Davis-Bacon Act (40 U.S.C. 3141-3144, and 3146-3148) as supplemented by Department of Labor regulations (29 CFR Part 5, “Labor Standards Provisions Applicable to Contracts Covering Federally Financed and Assisted Construction”). In accordance with the statute, contractors must be required to pay wages to laborers and mechanics at a rate not less than the prevailing wages specified in a wage determination made by the Secretary of Labor. In addition, contractors must be required to pay wages not less than once a week.. . .” Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Special Tests and Provisions – Wage Rate Requirements compliance requirements. The School Corporation did not include Davis Bacon wage rate requirements in its contract with vendor which includes labor. The School Corporation did not obtain the weekly payroll reports certifications from a construction company for a building project. Cause: The School Corporation's management had not developed a system of internal controls to ensure compliance with the compliance requirements listed above. Effect: The failure to design and implement an effective internal control system enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Special Tests and Provisions – Wage Rate Requirements compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: The School Corporation expended $324,887 during the audit period on an HVAC project was charged to the ESSER III grant award (84.425U). The construction contract did not include a Davis-Bacon clause prescribing federal wage rate requirements required for construction contracts. The School Corporation did not have an internal control designed to collect the weekly payroll reports certifications from the construction company and its subcontractors, as applicable, for the construction project to verify prevailing wages were being paid during the project period. Therefore, no review was performed by management to ensure that pay rates complied with the federal wage rate requirements. The construction payments represented approximately 52% of the Education Stabilization Fund disbursements reported on the SEFA for the period under audit. Identification as a repeat finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the School Corporation include Davis-Bacon wage requirements in construction contracts which are federally funded and implement a formal process to ensure the required weekly payroll report certifications are collected and reviewed by management to ensure compliance with the federal wage rate requirements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.

Corrective Action Plan

EINPING 2023-004 Information on the federal program: Subject: Education Stabilization Fund - Special Tests and Provisions - Wage Rate Requirements Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listing Number: 84.425U Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425U210013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Special Tests and Provisions - Wage Rate Requirements Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Qualified Opinion Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Special Tests and Provisions - Wage Rate Requirements compliance requirements. The School Corporation did not include Davis Bacon wage rate requirements in its contract with vendor which includes labor. The School Corporation did not obtain the weekly payroll reports certifications from a construction company for a building project. Context: The School Corporation expended $324,887 during the audit period on an HVAC project was charged to the ESSER Ill grant award (84.425U). The construction contract did not include a Davis-Bacon clause prescribing federal wage rate requirements required for construction contracts. The School Corporation did not have an internal control designed to collect the weekly payroll reports certifications from the construction company and its subcontractors, as applicable, for the construction project to verify prevailing wages were being paid during the project period. Therefore, no review was performed by management to ensure that pay rates complied with the federal wage rate requirements. The construction payments represented approximately 52% of the Education Stabilization Fund disbursements reported on the SEFA for the period under audit. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actjons: Management agrees with the finding and will take the following corrective action: In the future, all contracts with vendors that include labor will be required to include the Davis Bacon wage rate requirement in the contract if federal funds are being used for the project. Responsible party and timeUne for completion: Dr. Gib Crimmins Immediately

About Special Tests and Provisions →

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and compliance status.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.

Tri-Township Consolidated School Corporation - Single Audit | Single Audit Intelligence