Paint Valley Local School District

Having sound internal controls in place over the disbursement process is pertinent to a properly functioning control environment. Although the School District ultimately provided certified payrolls from contractors, we noted that the School District was unable to provide documentation that all certified payrolls selected for testing had been received and reviewed prior to making payments to contractors. Without proper controls over wage rate requirements, there is an increased risk that the School District and its contractors and subcontractors are not in compliance with applicable federal regulations. Additionally, noncompliance could result in federal funding being reduced or taken away, or other sanctions imposed by the federal grantor agency. We recommend that the School District implement additional procedures to ensure prevailing wage documentation provided by contractors is reviewed prior to making payments to contractors and that indication of the review of the certified payroll reports are maintained.

2 CFR 200.328 states, in part, (c) the recipient or subrecipient must submit financial reports as required by the Federal award. Reports submitted annually by the recipient or subrecipient must be due no later than 90 calendar days after the reporting period. Reports submitted quarterly or semiannually must be due no later than 30 calendar days after the reporting period. (d) The final financial report submitted by the recipient must be due no later than 120 calendar days after the conclusion of the period of performance. A subrecipient must submit a final financial report to a pass-through entity no later than 90 calendar days after the conclusion of the period of performance. See also § 200.344. The Federal agency or pass-through entity may extend the due date for any financial report with justification from the recipient or subrecipient. Further, 2 CFR 200.502(a) states that the determination of when a Federal award is expended must be based on when the activity related to the Federal award occurs. We noted that the District filed its FY23 final expenditure report by the required deadline. However, the District claimed $476,752 more in expenditures on the final expenditure report than they had identified in eligible expenditures for the program. The District reclassified $476,752 in ESSER expenditures from the general fund into the ESSER fund after the reporting deadline. We noted that this determination was made after the obligation period had ended and without an extension request being made to the pass-through agency, Ohio Department of Education and Workforce (ODEW) to extend the due date. Further, the ESSER expenditures adjusted from the general fund did not align with the object codes budgeted with ODEW through the Comprehensive Continuous Improvement Plan and reported on the final expenditure report. Additionally, system reports originally filed with ODEW along with the final expenditure report did not accurately reflect the expenditures ultimately claimed for the program. We recommend that the District adopt proper procedures to ensure that reported expenditures on the final expenditure report are accurate and obligated by the appropriate deadline. Requests to extend the due date of the reporting requirement should be made when necessary. Further, expenditures should only be made for objects budgeted and approved by ODEW. In instances where reclassifications are made to program expenditures, the District should ensure that revisions to previously submitted reports are made, when necessary.

Noncompliance and Material Weakness 2 CFR ? 3474.1 gives regulatory effect to the Department of Education for 2 CFR ? 200.331, which established requirements over subawards for pass-through entities and states, in part: All pass-through entities must: (b) Evaluate each subrecipient's risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring described in paragraphs (d) and (e); (d) Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved; (e) Depending upon the pass-through entity's assessment of risk posed by the subrecipient (as described in paragraph (b) of this section), the CFR lists monitoring tools that may be useful for the pass-through entity to ensure proper accountability and compliance with program requirements and achievement of performance goals. We noted the District did not perform a subrecipient checklist prior to allocating funds. Additionally, the District did not complete monitoring procedures for subrecipients. The District should implement procedures to verify that all required reviews are documented and any additional required follow ups are accurately documented.

Noncompliance and Significant Deficiency 2 CFR ? 3474.1 gives regulatory effect to the Department of Education for 2 CFR ?200.332(a) requires all pass-through entities must: (a) Ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the following information at the time of the subaward and if any of these data elements change, include the changes in subsequent subaward modification. When some of this information is not available, the passthrough entity must provide the best information available to describe the Federal award and subaward. Required information includes: (1) Federal award identification. (i) Subrecipient name (which must match the name associated with its unique entity identifier); (ii) Subrecipient's unique entity identifier; (iii) Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN); (iv) Federal Award Date (see the definition of Federal award date in ?200.1 of this part) of award to the recipient by the Federal agency; (v) Subaward Period of Performance Start and End Date; (vi) Subaward Budget Period Start and End Date; (vii) Amount of Federal Funds Obligated by this action by the pass-through entity to the subrecipient; (viii) Total Amount of Federal Funds Obligated to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity including the current financial obligation; (ix) Total Amount of the Federal Award committed to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity; (x) Federal award project description, as required to be responsive to the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA); (xi) Name of Federal awarding agency, pass-through entity, and contact information for awarding official of the Pass-through entity; (xii) Assistance Listings number and Title; the pass-through entity must identify the dollar amount made available under each Federal award and the Assistance Listings Number at time of disbursement; (xiii) Identification of whether the award is R&D; and (xiv) Indirect cost rate for the Federal award (including if the de minimis rate is charged) per ?200.414. We noted the District signed a memorandum of understanding with the subrecipient, however; the agreement did not specifically identify the subrecipient as a subrecipient or include all award information as required above. The District should ensure all required information is included in the subrecipient agreement.

GSA_MIGRATION

GSA_MIGRATION