EIN: 272837355
UEI: D9KXK8SRNEL4
Data as of August 23, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on April 13, 2020. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by October 13, 2020 (2140 days ago).
What is a management decision? →We noted one subaward, entered into during Fiscal Year 2012/13, in which certain required award information and applicable requirements were not provided at the time of subaward. The following information was not provided at the time of subaward: ? CFDA title and number ? Award name and number ? If the award is research and development Additionally, we noted that ICTC did not maintain adequate documentation of during-the-subaward monitoring to ascertain if the monitoring procedures performed provided reasonable assurance that subrecipients used Federal awards for authorized purposes, complied with laws and regulations, and the provisions of contracts and grant agreements, and achieved performance goals. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs were identified as a result of our procedures. Context: The conditions noted above were identified during our procedures over ICTC?s subrecipient monitoring procedures. Effect: ICTC did not identify the required elements of the subaward to the subrecipient at the time of subaward, increasing the risk of noncompliance and did not follow their own subrecipient monitoring policies and procedures. Cause: ICTC?s procedures did not ensure that the required award information and applicable requirements were communicated to the subrecipient. Additionally, we noted that ICTC did not implement monitoring procedures as outlined in their Subrecipient Monitoring Policies and Procedures (dated July 2016) for sub-recipients who entered into agreements with ICTC prior to policy creation. Recommendation: ICTC should amend subawards to present award information and applicable requirements. Additionally, ICTC should implement monitoring procedures for all subrecipients as outlined in ICTC?s Subrecipient Monitoring Policies and Procedures. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan: See separate corrective action plan.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Program Name: Federal Transit Cluster CFDA No.: 20.507 Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of Transportation Award Year: FY 2012/13 Compliance Requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Criteria: 2 CFR Part 200.331(a), Requirements for Pass-Through Entities, states that all pass-through entities must ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes certain information at the time of subaward. Condition: We noted one subaward, entered into during Fiscal Year 2012/13, in which certain required award information and applicable requirements were not provided at the time of subaward. The following information was not provided at the time of subaward: ? CFDA title and number ? Award name and number ? If the award is research and development Additionally, we noted that ICTC did not maintain adequate documentation of during-the-subaward monitoring to ascertain if the monitoring procedures performed provided reasonable assurance that subrecipients used Federal awards for authorized purposes, complied with laws and regulations, and the provisions of contracts and grant agreements, and achieved performance goals. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs were identified as a result of our procedures. Context: The conditions noted above were identified during our procedures over ICTC?s subrecipient monitoring procedures. Effect: ICTC did not identify the required elements of the subaward to the subrecipient at the time of subaward, increasing the risk of noncompliance and did not follow their own subrecipient monitoring policies and procedures. Cause: ICTC?s procedures did not ensure that the required award information and applicable requirements were communicated to the subrecipient. Additionally, we noted that ICTC did not implement monitoring procedures as outlined in their Subrecipient Monitoring Policies and Procedures (dated July 2016) for sub-recipients who entered into agreements with ICTC prior to policy creation. Recommendation: ICTC should amend subawards to present award information and applicable requirements. Additionally, ICTC should implement monitoring procedures for all subrecipients as outlined in ICTC?s Subrecipient Monitoring Policies and Procedures. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan: See separate corrective action plan.
Subrecipient Monitoring Management?s Response: We concur. View of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action: ICTC had a FY 12/13 5307 grant that did not have the correct criteria in its subrecipient agreement. ICTC obtained a similar finding its in its FTA Triennial Review that was completed in 2019-2020. ICTC has since updated its subrecipient agreement for future subrecipient opportunities. Name of Responsible Person: David Aguirre, Program Manager Implementation Date: June 2020
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Monitor subrecipient audit findings and compliance status.
Start monitoring →© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.