Christian Valley Park Community Service District

EIN: 263844992

UEI: DWTBF8MVRLS9

Data as of August 24, 2026

Christian Valley Park Community Service District1 audit years1 findings
1
Audit Years
1
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings

FY 2022-06-30

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on August 1, 2024. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by February 1, 2025 (569 days ago).

What is a management decision? →
2022-001
Reporting
QUESTIONED COSTS

During a review of progress reports submitted to USDA and actual costs incurred as recorded in the accounting records, it was noted that the total of interest costs reported USDA did not match to the total of interest costs recorded in the accounting records. 3. Criteria: 2 CFR Section 200.329 requires that entities receiving federal funds “relate financial data and accomplishments to performance goals and objectives of the Federal award. Also, in accordance with above mentioned common information collections, and when required by the terms and conditions of the Federal award, recipients must provide cost information to demonstrate cost effective practices (e.g., through unit cost data).” 4. Cause of Condition: A separation between accounting and reporting allowed reports to be submitted for costs that were not actually incurred. 5. Effect of Condition: The District reported $60,038 more interest than what was actually incurred during the year ended June 30, 2022. 6. Recommendation: All reports submitted in relation to federal programs should be reconciled to the accounting records before submission to the applicable federal entity. 7. Client response: While discussing this issue with the USDA over email it was agreed that other expenses that were previously paid by the district and not covered by the USDA loan would be acceptable to use instead of the miscalculated, overage of the interest expense. The district had spent several hundred thousand dollars in funds above the originally budgeted district contribution towards the Water Storage Tank Project previous to acquiring the loan with the USDA.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

The District failed to accurately report program costs. 1. Program Information: Water Storage Tank Project, CFDA Number 10.760. 2. Condition: During a review of progress reports submitted to USDA and actual costs incurred as recorded in the accounting records, it was noted that the total of interest costs reported USDA did not match to the total of interest costs recorded in the accounting records. 3. Criteria: 2 CFR Section 200.329 requires that entities receiving federal funds “relate financial data and accomplishments to performance goals and objectives of the Federal award. Also, in accordance with above mentioned common information collections, and when required by the terms and conditions of the Federal award, recipients must provide cost information to demonstrate cost effective practices (e.g., through unit cost data).” 4. Cause of Condition: A separation between accounting and reporting allowed reports to be submitted for costs that were not actually incurred. 5. Effect of Condition: The District reported $60,038 more interest than what was actually incurred during the year ended June 30, 2022. 6. Recommendation: All reports submitted in relation to federal programs should be reconciled to the accounting records before submission to the applicable federal entity. 7. Client response: While discussing this issue with the USDA over email it was agreed that other expenses that were previously paid by the district and not covered by the USDA loan would be acceptable to use instead of the miscalculated, overage of the interest expense. The district had spent several hundred thousand dollars in funds above the originally budgeted district contribution towards the Water Storage Tank Project previous to acquiring the loan with the USDA.

Corrective Action Plan

While discussing this issue with the USDA over email it was agreed that other expenses that were previously paid by the district and not covered by the USDA loan would be acceptable to use instead of the miscalculated, overage of the interest expense. The district had spent several hundred thousand dollars in funds above the originally budgeted district contribution towards the Water Storage Tank Project previous to acquiring the loan with the USDA.

About Reporting →

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and compliance status.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.